Petition For Writ of Mandamus Florida District Court of Appeal
Petition For Writ of Mandamus Florida District Court of Appeal
RICHARD ENGLAND,
Petitioner,
vs.
petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the Circuit Court of the
Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Volusia County Florida to strike unauthorized
REQUIRED STATEMENT
made for this petition to comply with the requirement of the Supreme Court of
Florida's ruling in Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472, 478 (Fla. 2003); and Johnson v.
State, 974 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2008). In RE the exception to the nullity rule:
I, the Petitioner, Richard England, hereby request to discharge CCRC due to'
their failure to file a motion to strike unauthorized pro se motion for trial in the
Circuit Court on my behalf while having lmowledge of the facts, and for
prosecuting a frivolous appeal.
Florida Rules of
. Appellate Procedure. Mandamus is the proper remedy since '
,
duty is mandated by appellate courts and the nullity rule. See Logan, and
Johnson, supra; also Whiting v. State, 929 So.2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006);
Sheppard v. State, 391 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1980); and Christiansen v.
The matter before the Court is about an unauthorized motion for trial and the
,',
Trial Court's ministerial duty to strike the motion for trial because the motion is a
nullity.
On November 6th , 2003, the Petitioner was indicted for first-degree murder
and robbery. On December 2nd , 2003, the Trial Court appointed attorney Gerard
Keating to represent the Petitioner. On March 16t i1, 2004, Attorney Keating and the
2
Petitioner appeared in open court at the pre-trial hearing and made a motion to
continue and waived. speedy trial. The court granted the motion and set the next
. "'."
On April 16t\ 2004, at the status conference hearing and against Attorney
Keating's intentions the trial court allowed the Petitioner to make a motion for
trial. The motion for trial consisted of the Petitioner arguing why he was not ready
to continue trial and waive speedy trial. The Petitioner introduced and objected to
Petitioner agreed to sign the motion to continue trial, Attorney Keating signed the
motion, and the court, for a second time, granted the motion and entered an order
Subsequently thereafter, the Petitioner had another change of mind and made
This ore tenus motion for trial was insufficient to trigger a Nelson /
Hardwich hearing and therefore the motion for trial was a nullity. The trial court
mistakenly acted on this nullity and set the case for trial May 10tt, 2004, held trial,
3
On November 15 th , 2010, the Petitioner filed a pro se Motion to Strike
Unauthorized Pro Se Motion for Trial. On November 1ih, 2010 the State in
Strike Unauthorized Pro Se Pleading. Also on November 30t \ 2010, but without
first taking into consideration the Petitioner's Reply to State's Motion, or its
ministerial duty, the trial court entered an Order striking Defendant's pro se
Motion to Strike Unauthorized Pro Se Motion and Order Granting State's Motion
North Alabama Avenue, Deland, Florida, 32724 to strike the April 16th , 2004
unauthorized pro se motion for trial because it's a nullity and reverse all actions
taken by the trial court therefrom that are also null and void. (App. D).
IV. ARGUMENT
that day the Petitioner made an unauthorized pro se ore tenus motion for trial. The
Petitioner's motion for trial does not dispute that he is represented by counsel. Nor
4
did Attorney Gerard Keating adopt the motion. In fact, Attorney Keating objected
In order to avoid the operation of the general rule that pro se motions are a
nullity and should be stricken, a defendant must make specific allegations that he
wishes to discharge his court appointed attorney, and have new counsel appointed,
or to represent himself. However, the Petitioner's April 16th , pro se motion for trial
is not sufficient to warrant a hearing pursuant to Nelson v. State, 247 So.2d 256
(Fla 4th DCA 1973) or Hardwich v. State, 527 So.2d 1071, 1074-75 (Fla. 1988).
NelsonlHardwich inquiry, it is a nullity and the Petitioner moves that the Motion
for Trial, along with all action taken by the trial court in response thereto be
stricken.
The Petitioner made an express, distinct, demand for the trial court to strike
as a nullity, the April 16th , 2004 unauthorized pro se motion for trial on November
15 th , 2010.
Instead of the trial court recognizing its duty to strike the April 16th , 2004
unauthorized pro se motion, the trial court instead struck as a legal nullity the
Petitioner's November 15 th , 2010 motion based on the State's November 17t\ 2010
5
The State's motion is frivolous for two reasons; 1. The November 5t \ 2010
Motion to Strike Unauthorized Pro Se Motion for Trial, and , 2. The Petitioner's
also sufficiently litigated for the trial court to recognize its duty to strike April 16th ,
The Petitioner is left with no other remedy but to seek the assistance of the
Supreme Court of Florida to compel the trial court to strike, as a nullity, the
unauthorized pro se motion of April 16th , 2004. And, since this case involves a
death sentence, and appeal from that is technically null and void as result of the
unauthorized motion.
motion where the defendant is represented by counsel, and motion does not include
a clear request to discharge counsel, this Court should issue a writ of mandamus.
The trial court should be directed to strike the Petitioner's April 16th , 2004
Respectfully Submitted
"C> --.Q~.Q)
Richard England#ll574
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that a true and correct copy of this petition was
furnished by U.S. Mail, first-class, to: The Honorable James R. Clayton, Circuit
Court Judge, Volusia County Courthouse, 101 N. Alabama Ave., Deland, Florida
Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, 3801 Coporex Park Drive, Suite 210, Tampa,
General, 444 Seabreeze Blvd., Suite 500, Daytona Beach, Florida 32118, this q-\h-
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
~~~Q
Richard England # 11 74
Petitioner, pro se
7
APPENDIX
INDEX
D. Order of Assignment
APPENDIX A
2
1
•
1
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF
2 FLORIDA, IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
3 CASE NO.: 03-3S769-CFAES
4
5
STATE OF FLORIDA,
6
Plaintiff,
7
-vs-
8
RICHARD ENGLAND,
9
Defendant.
10
--------------------------/
11
12
101 North Alabama Avenue
13 DeLand, Florida
March 16, 2004
14 8:30 a.m.
15
16
17 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
18
23
24
25
• APPEARANCES:
1
2
ED DAVIS, ESQUIRE
3 ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY
101 North Alabama Ave~ue
4 DeLand, Florida 32724
5 On behalf of the Plaintiff
6
11
12
•
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
• 1
3
THEREUPON,
THE COURT:
9 few months.
10 THE COURT: How many months? We can roll it as
24 it to the Court.
25
3 STATE OF FLORIDA
4 COUNTY OF ORANGE
5
11 recordings thereof.
12
'. 13
14
15
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my
16
17
18
19
20 Kara E. Reynols
21 SCLAFANI WILLIAMS COURT REPORTERS, INC.
22
23
24
• 25
3
"
vs.
RICHARD ENGLAND
Defendant.
----------------~/
MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
COMES NO'V the Defendant, RlCHARD ENGLAND, by and through the undersigned
counsel, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court enter its Order continuing the trial
scheduled for April 5, 2004, this cause. And as grounds therefore would show:
1. On March 16, 2004, the attorney for the defendant and the defendant appeared in
open court at the pre trial on this case. The defendant and his attorney requested. a continuance
4. The Assistant State Attorney, Ed Davis has no objection to this motion. P" .....,
5. The defendant requests that the Court set the next pre trial in August sin~J ,the ~:i:~
:n:"
nl'-
........ .-:;'" .'l')
undersigned attorney will be in a month long trial in July in State vs. Roy McDu:t:q~~~ ;.1:1 .. ,
r.i_: . ,"", :
• '-"'Z''''',. ..,..,
WHEREFORE, Defendant, RICHARD ENGLAND, moves this Honora_imd:~~~> .- .. '.!
.' ~t.-
;
its order continuing the trial in 1h~ above styled case. "-.:
....c. , '.''.
~
...,r-
~ "
.O~ 83
t
~~~.DE.9fJ
RlCHARD ENGLAND .
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy hereof has been furnished by HAND
delivery to: ED DAVIS, Assistant State Attorney, 251 N. Ridgewood Avenue, Daytona Beach,
~y of~2004.
.. tr;fIA G
FL 32114 this
By:_ _ _~-b4''--------
Gerar . Keating, Esquire
Flori Bar No.: 328571
318 Silver Beach Avenue
Daytona Beach~ Florida 32118
(386) 2522501
Attorney for Defendant
.~. 84
( ('
vs.
RlCHARD ENGLAND,
Defendant.
. /
THIS CAUSE came before this Court on Tuesday, March 16,2004, at the pre trial up'on
the Defendant's Motion to Continue Trial and the Court having heard argument and·1:?eip.g duly
2. The Clerk is hereby directed to set the nex"! pre triai in August 2004.
CIRCUITCOU
S. JAMES FO
I 85
cc: Gerard F. Keating, Esquire /
Ed Davis, Esquire
FU.:f'D IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
VOLlJSIf\ GI'lIINTY. F1.O~JO"
APR 19 2004
CLER»(
*, Dipl\t)I o.1IIt
-
___d .
• ..,_
V".
APPENDIXC
4
11\i THE Cll~CU1T COURT, SEVENTH
JUDICiAL CIRCUli} iN AND FOR
VOLUSIA COU\\ITY'j FLORIDA
vs.
Defendant.
----------------~/
MOTIONTO STRlKE UNAUTHORIZED PROSE MOTION
COlVIES NOW) +he De.fe.ndcn+ RICHARD E.NGLA"ID, C1r.d here.b y moves +his Honorable.
Cour'~ +0 s+ri ke. }he. De.,fendcmt-'s ?ro s;'ivlo+ion for Tric{' Qnd in support would show +he 'follow'rI19~
1. On Apr'll \G:,) Zo04 during +he.s-f-a-tlls c.onfe,e.nce. he.o.rifl<j the. DetendC:d_-\- ·wo.S
motions;
I). \.vny De.-re.ndo.n+ WQS n',l- re~y +0 en+e.ro. de.c'l sian +0. cOl'l'hllue. und waive. speedy
+ricL(Sp01.dy+rlc,! IN(IS e{,te.drw.ly waived on Horch ib. 2004. See a++achd hearin9)
oJ, M 0+1 on +0 ReJease
2), O:~ner I-eason why Def~ndD.nt hnd 00+ si9ned '~he. meA-ionic con-l-;nue. nnd 'wa.v'e,
£'pe.ed y tr'lo.l.
b). 1"'10+1 on to Rec.usl:' (DAR V4-,P~Sl-0(0)
THE DEFENDANT: You. Honor" I cho.n.!je m'\j mind. I'm ~oin9'\-c <jck\-r\c.\\.
I'm re.a.ciy tor the. ,hi 0.\ . Trn flO'\- go\ns+o wni,ranyrnore.lrn sen-y,
o.s '~c\\cvv'<;;:
o rde.red eQ.Se se:\- for +\10.\ on \V\Q.y 'to, 2004,. held +\"'10-.\ und ob+'Dined u. Ccnv'\choll
4. 1n orde:r +0 o.vo\d ·t-he. oper o '\- ion at the. '3 e.ne\-a\ ,ul~ +ha.+ pro se moTions cir.~·o..
null i+y o.nd s\,ouid be s+ricken,/ a de.fendCln+ muS+ n,o..ke. spe.cific a.\\ego..+ions -/-hat he wishest-6
discho.rtje. his cal.ll'·\- a.ppo·ln+ed o.:r+orney Ge.ro.\-d l<ec.:l-in9 and hove !"lew counse.\ a:ppc\''Y'rec\ or·to
'1epre.sen-\- himse.\f, Howe.v~, .. the. Dete.ndantS "Ivlc'hen Fer T ric.1 ,. is nd" suffi ci e.n+ +c wa.l"rQ.nt
0. heo..ri f\<;j pursUQ.n+ -\-0 N 12.1 Son v. Stc+e J 247 So. 2d 251o(F-\o...4·jh DCA.ICJ(3) 0\ Horch'lJlc:.h v. S·hire..j
S27 So.2d 1071) !074 ..75(F1a., Iq'CS)· 'be.cci,u'se. -the Defenc\a.nH Mc·l-ion Fer Tried is ·t-o.c'Ia.\\y
insuf·tic:'ren+ '1'0 tri9:l~\ 0. Nel £'on/Ha.rclwlch :lnquiry, i·t- is 0. nuH \·ry .of\cl the De.·fe.nclc,n+
move';) t-hc..'~ +he jv\ohon forT,lo\ C'.I.\on~ wlt-h cd\ C\<:+ian ta.ken by th.e. Cour-\- in re.sponse..
REQUIRED STATEMENT
Ine. Dde.nc\un·~ is c.urre.n+ Iy \~e..pre.se.(\ red by +h.e. OUlr:e o·~ +h.e Ca..p; 1-0.\ C'G \ lo..l;"€'I"'l\ \
Re.C;I,onol Cc:unse\ IVliddle Re~ion(CCRC). The.re·fore, '\he+o\\cw~n9 s+o.-t-e.men+ jr; rnc.ck .for
+his motion +0 compl)' 'V\;'I l-h \-he re.qYICoerne.nt o·~ the. SiJpre.lne CCV'I't ot- Fio,,'\c\q'S I-uli,,'j in
lCCJa..nv StCl:re) 84~ So.2.d 472.(FIc... 2003); o.nd JohnsoTlV. Src..·'re.) q74 So.2d 3b3LFIa..20o~).
or, I-he D.e.tenc\o.rrt, Ric:hard Enq)a.nd h<2,e.by \-eq:.ue..o:>t- +0 d',s e.\.o.rlje.. CeRe:. due.
t-Cl S~vere. cOII~iic+ o·~ ;nte.re.~·\- unci eleCtr cnd c:anv'ln<:'liI<j in<:oTT\'P<2:ter.c.~.
ihe Severe con~\ict- ot- I"'\-eres+ i:; rho,\- CeRe "va.", pr'u"v';c\e, i"FcT''f''I\c'1-,c:m o..bCGt
+he uncu·)-hc,j·z..e.d pro Se. mel-ion/lege.\ nul \ I l-y +ho.+ d ernons.rro.tes 0.\\ .\-he. do.:I1"Y'\s rQ'\sQJ
S'ltuoA-ion is c\ecLI Cind convIncing incompetence. An clppel jq:re o..-H-o,ney hos 0.0 ·e+hica.\
ddy n01- +0 prose.cute 0. bC\.se\ess Ot- hivatc;vs o.ppeo.\ - We.s-\-'s F.S_ A_ Bet. Rule 4-3. \.
to S'I-r'l l<e the. De.fe.ndant's pro Sg" fvlo+lcn .for Tr'iCiI" o.nd ClI'\ actions loken 1n re.spon.5e. by' +he.
Respe.dtuH y su6rni-H-e.d)
~~-S)~~
Rlcho.rd EnglctI")d =# 11'5574
U,,'ion Correction.o.\ Institu'hon
781Cf NW2.2Sl-hStree-l-
R.aj-Ford, Florido. 32.02~-44-2.0
CERTIFlCATE OF SERVICE
1 HEREBY CERT1F'( thC\'\- CL 'h"ve ond c.oned eopl' he.reof hC\'ii be.-<Il furn:lshed by
~~-\:j,~~~
. }; a:::::::::::,
RiC\")C\\-dEng\c\ild fl 115574
Union Corre.diolla\ i nST,1-u'hon
78 \q N W 2..28 th S+ree:r
Ro.'fon:l, Floridc:t 32.02b-Li420
M
•
1
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF
2 FLORIDA, IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
3 CASE NO.: 03-3S769-CFAES
4
5
STATE OF FLORIDA,
6
Plaintiff,
7
-vs-
8
RICHARD ENGLAND,
9
Defendant.
10
--------------------------/
11
12
101 North Alabama Avenue
13 DeLand, Florida
t 14
March 16, 2004
8:30 a.m.
15
16
17 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
18
23
24
25
•
1 THEREUPON,
9 few months.
10 THE COURT: How many months? We can roll it as
11 long as as you want.
25
4
STATE OF FLORIDA
5
FILED IN THE OFFICE OFTHE
vs. CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
6 VOl USIA COUNTY FLORIDA '
RICHARD ALLEN ENGLAND,
7 AUG 102004
Defendant.
8 CLERK
By , . Dopu!y Clork
9
10
. V:l
n
r ..... -1
<=
......
11 -< f"1
::0
.::::>-
,s::: -'-
12
i
\
.
A t::I
I"T1
a
3::~
(f) C)
>-
. '.,
\
. c::
-0 .1 ..
{j')r"'
:~()1 :;::::J cr-
13 \ r" PPl
~ -".. ~
101 North Alabama Avenu~ m tl ..----
"].';':1
( 14 DeLand, Florida 'J. ("?
'
,......
0
April 16, 2004 'I
,~
c:
~.
'r
j
;u ......,f:'
15 8:40 a.m. j ~q1 -~
16
17
18
19 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
24
'.:'~'"
.:::jl\;·~~r~,:
WHEREUPON the following proceedings were had:
25
';~!i~~£~/
\"
Sclafani Williams Court Reporters, Inc.
(866) SET-DEPO (738-3376) 843
27
1 THE COURT: You make the decision. I
)
Sclafani Williams Court Reporters, Inc. GG8
(866) SET-DEPO (738-3376)
28
1 ·separately and we'll have that hearing. I'll
5 sir?
8 and
14 sorry.
8 do it.
10 go.
13 waiving.
) 14 THE DEFENDANT: Thank you.
)
Sclafani Williams Court Reporters, Inc.
(866) SET-DEPO (738-3376) G71
( r"
:~
"
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN A.},1J) FOR
VOLUSLJ\ COUNTY, FLORIDA.
STATE OF FLORIDA
vs.
RICHARD ENGLAND,
Defendant.
--------------------./
. NOTICE OF FJLING
The Court files its Notice of Filing Defendant's Motion to Continue Trial dated .
Apri116, 2004, and the Court's Order thereto Granting the Motion to Continue, which are
attached hereto. In Open Court, and subsequent to the Order Granting the Motion to
Continue having been signed by the Court, Defendant announced he did not wish to
continue the trial. The Court rescinded the order Granting the Motion to Continue Trial
and set the instant case for trial on May 10, 2004.
. DONE AND ORDERED in Open Court this 16th day of April, 2004, at DeLand,
Volusia County, Florida.
, CIRCUIT JUDGE
COPIES TO:
Ed Davis, Assistant State Attorney
Gerard F. Keating, Attorney for Defendant
:,.;,-,
'-.:
.
,,- 1
,
.,
, c..
8,2-"':'
t;';
-~ :"',
. ~ i"
[},,, ...
:," ;-;:-~~
C) ::', . ~.·,.~·._.7
r).~; - -
~'.''''
(-Jr.:
G::-:'~.·
-.,
1"''' -.... J
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT; SEVENTII
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA
COMES NOW the State of Florida, by and through its UIidersigned counsel; arid hereby files
this motion to strike the Defendant's November 15, 2010 pro se motion to strike his prior ore
tenus motion for trial on April 16, as unauthorized pleadings filed by a litigant wp.o is
represented by counsel. In support the State would show:
That England is a death-sentenced inmate who is currently represented by the Office of the
Capital Collateral Regional Counsel- Middle Region (CCRC). This Court conducted a lengthy
Nelson hearing and a Faretta inquiry attended by Mr. England on November 5, 20 1O~ which
resuited .ip, the determination by this Court that Mr. England's Collateral counsel is providing
effective representation, that there is no conflict between Mr. England and
.
his collateral counsel,
.
and that 1l~ is n(}t entitled to represent himself in the pending Rule 3.851 litigation before this
. . ,'.
~ ':" . ' ,
:'~!. .. -:.. . . . - .
Co~ MI. England has rePeatedly acknowi~ged that he 'is not.perIIlitiM to file pro. se plead~gs .
w-hile represented by counsei and that the Court acted properly in s.triking his unauthorized pro
se pleadings:
WHEREFORE, the State of Florida moves that the Defendant's pro se "Motion for
Rehearing" be stricken, for 1:he reason set forth above.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy hereofhas been furnished by
faxlmail/hand delivery to the Honorable James R Clayton, Circuit Court Judge, Volusia County
Courthouse, 101 North Alabama Avenue, DeLand, Florida 32724; to Barbara C. Davis, Assistant
• • • ." •• •• ~" • M __ ", • .., •• • ' . • _ .,'. • • _, _ • • . ' _ ." • • ••
th
Attorney General, 444 Seabreeze Boulevard, 5 Floor, Daytona Beach"F1orida 32118; and to
Richard Kiley, Ali Shako or, and James Viggiano, Assistant CCRC, Office of CCRe-Middle
Region, 3801 Corporex Park Drive, Suite 210, Tamp~, Florida 33619, this 11-1tiy of
November,201O.
'M='-~~'; /. -', •
....
..~ " ''',
RICHARD E:NGLAND,
De:fe.ndOon+
_________________1
COlvlES NOVY! +h~ D efe.nda[)+; RICHARD EI',,J GLAI'I! D J Qnd hl:!.re.b y ·files +his Reply +0 S+a+e's
l\lovem6er 17) 20"/0 /Vic'hon To S+r'Ii{e Una.\)·~hCl,-·rz.e.cl Pro Se PI-€.ac\'!ng, Ctnd ;n suppDd }h e
The Ddenc:\Gf\+ rece'\vecl c,copy G'P ·~he. Sh\"\e"s Novembe.r 17) 2.010 1'16:hon Te S-tnKe U[)C\ul-hcr;-z.;ad
?ro Se PI ead l"~ OJ, N Dve.mbe., 24,2010. Due -1-0 +he ThQ1"IKss'lv\n9 hCllidClY; ·~he. D",f~du.n:\- fi les +hi ~
rep\')' ·\-oc\C.'I' Wi·th due respect '\-0 ·\-he. Stute, the. S+a+e's November 17, '2.010 IV! o+icn To S'hlke +h~
Defe.n.c\an+'S ~ovelY\be.r '5 . '2010 !vlol'lon To S+ri ke. UnCtulhori'Z..e:d Pro Se. MDf-ion Fer TriQI is frivolous.
"The. D€.fe.ndan+s l''1otior. To S'h-'Ike Unau+hcr·\'z.ed Pre Se. Me'hon Fo,-Trial;s In comp"\c<nce 'VVTth +he.
1-e9:.",\,e.n'1en+ o·~ ·\-he Supre..N'le. Coud o·r 1=1 ori do.'s ,-u\; ":lIn: LO<j0..n v, S+a:+ej 84Gb S't,. 2:c{'47'Z'
(Flo- :2.003); and John son v· S ta t-e , q74 So.2.d 3<03 (r-Io. .200s).1 n re the. excep\-~on h the. nu II i+y
ru le.
'vV'i--IEREFORE) lhe Defe.ndary.j. Rlchaccl En'3lonc\ n"\ove.s +hls \-lonoro.bl", Cc>u'+'~o sl-nk~
+he Defendo.,,-t s Uno.u·H,cr·\ z.€d F're Se Mohon FOI- Tria.l .for- -I1-te reo.son sed -Fadh in +he. D·efendanl-S
Nov·embe.r i5, 2010 l'1dlDn To S+n Ke. Unauthori·z..ed Pre Se tvI,,-\-IO\"'l.
REOU1RED STATEMENT
1 the De tendon+) Ri chcu-d E 119 \C\nd hf::!..l-eb/ I-e~u~s+ +0 d I se:hol'::)€' CC RC -For '~he',r
j
-ro.i Iur€: +0 ,L Ie the tvl<d-l on To S+,'l ke Unou+horl zed (VI 0+1 on Fo c TI-j'nl on -the De. ~e."c\o.f'\+s
b<'!'hC;>..\-F· c.nd '~Ol- prosee:.Ld-inS 0- {',..';volous appeal,
I HEREBY CERTf FY th",+ (L hue and corred- copy hereof hQ,s be"-n 'fun,"shed by 'Fi 1-5+
cia sc.; n.cu I +0 -t-he Honorc,ble Jo.n1e.s R. C I nylon) Ci I-cu',-f Cou.-+ Judge. Vol uS iG.. County COLwthouSeJ
io\ Nor+h Ala.bama AvenuQ) Oe lo.nd, Ffor'ldct 32724; +0 B a.cbo.rc:. C, Do.v; s, A £,"'1 s+o.r\'~A++on'\ey
Co,lhoun ,A.ssi s-l-on+ S+Ct+e..A~+o'-ne.y') 251 N, R id:Jewoocl AVe.nue,) Oay+01)a. Beac:J."lj nor-Ide.. 3 2 \ \4;
RECEIVED
UNION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
NOV 3 0 2010
BY__~~~~~____
FOR MAILING
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH
nmICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
v.
RICHARD ENGLAND,
Defendant.
------------------~/
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT'S PRO SE MOTION TO STRIKE
UNA UTHORlZED PRO SE MOTION
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the Court upon the Defendant's pro se
"Motion to Strike Unauthorized Pro Se Motion." The Court having reviewed the motion, and
being otherwise fully advised of the premises, fmds as follows:
Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, 444 Seabreeze Blvd., Suite 500,
Daytona Beach, Florida.
Richard B. Kiley, Ali A. Shako or, and James B. Viggiano Jr., Assistant CCRCs,
Office ofCCRC-Middle, 3801 Corporex Park Drive, Suite 210, Tampa, Florida 33619
Richard England, DC# 115574, Union Correctional Institution, 7819 N.W. 228th
Street, Raiford, Florida 32026-4000
2
.t.
.1
v.
RICHARD ENGLAND,
Defendant.
------------------~/
ORDER GRANTING STATE'S MOTION TO STRIKE
UNAUTHORIZED PRO SE PLEADING
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the Court upon the State's "Motion to
Strike Unauthorized Pro Se Pleading." The Court having reviewed the motion, and being
otherwise fully advised of the premises, hereby:
Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, 444 Seabreeze Blvd., Suite 500,
Daytona Beach, Florida.
Richard B. Kiley, Ali A. Shakoor, and James B. Viggiano Jr., Assistant CCRCs,
Office ofCCRC-Middle, 3801 Corporex Park Drive, Suite 210, Tampa, Florida 33619
Richard England, DC# 115574, Union Correctional Institution, 7819 N.W. 228th
Street, Raiford, Florida 32026-4000
APPENDIXD
5
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA
vs.
RIcHARD ENGLAND
Defendant.
----------------------~/
ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT
LIAM A. PARSONS
CHIEF JUDGE
r
,
Copy to: