Jurnal Mayang
Jurnal Mayang
Kebiri Kimia
ABSTRACT
This issue has been started of a court ruling Number 69 / Pid.sus / 2019 /
PN.Mjk, which provides chemical castration sentence , while PERPPU No. 1 of
2016 which is used as the legal basis for the penalty has no implementing rules or
regulations. That resulted in the occurrence of pros and cons among the experts
and the community of who are the authorized executors of the chemical castration.
The research in this thesis is a normative research, using the Law approach and
conceptual approach. The formulation of the problem in this study are: Who has
the authority to carry out chemical castration sentence imposed by the Judge on
sex offenders against children? The results showed that, normatively in the
criminal justice system in Indonesia, the executor of the criminal decision should
be the Prosecutor, but in the case of the of chemical castration the Prosecutor did
not have the competence to carry out the execution. However, there are several
criminal acts, related to limited competence in the executions, Prosecutor's Office
coordinates with other institutions for example the execution of capital punishment.
Therefore, in related to the chemical castration the Prosecutor's Office is able
cooperate with health institutions / medical personnel or other relevant institutions
as has been done by several countries that implement castration against sexual
offenders.
Undang- Undang