Honestie Hodges Family Federal Lawsuit
Honestie Hodges Family Federal Lawsuit
Plaintiff,
v.
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________________/
and through her attorneys, DREW COOPER & ANDING, alleges and states as follows:
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
1. This action is brought against the City of Grand Rapids pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 for
holding her at gunpoint, handcuffing her, and placing her in custody in a police car as she
2. The Grand Rapids Police Department (“GRPD”) allegedly descended on Honesties’ home
3. Honestie Hodges, at 11 years old and African American, did not in any way fit the
4. Honestie was cooperative and responsive to the officers, even though terrified by the
circumstances.
8. Without probable cause or reasonable suspicion that Honestie was committing or had
committed a crime, in the presence of her mother and others, Honestie Hodges was
detained at gunpoint, handcuffed, and placed in a police car --- nervous, afraid, and deathly
fearful for her safety, and also the well-being of her family.
-2-
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 11/22/23 Page 3 of 33
9. Given the history and recent tragic interactions between law enforcement and African
American citizens, Honestie had a legitimate fear that she would be shot and killed.
10. The trauma Honestie endured that night lasted for the remainder of her short lifetime.
11. After that confrontation by officers, Honestie’s life was marred with extreme emotional
and psychological distress significantly diminishing her quality of life and her ability to
12. Honestie prematurely died on November 22, 2020 of complications from COVID-19 at the
age of 14.
13. The City of Grand Rapids, through the Grand Rapids Police Department, has exercised a
pattern, custom, and practice of using excessive force, seizing, detaining and/or arresting
African American children and youth citizens without probable cause or reasonable
a. in March 2017, Grand Rapids Police Department officers held several African
American boys at gunpoint as the boys were walking home after playing basketball;
b. in December 2017, Honestie Hodges was held at gunpoint outside of her home;
and,
c. in August 2018, Grand Rapids Police Department officers similarly stopped two
African American boys (11 years old) and a teenager, detained them, and held them
at gunpoint.
15. None of these children were armed, dangerous, or had committed any semblance of a
crime.
16. In March 2018, the GRPD adopted the “Honestie Policy” which calls for using the least
restrictive option when interacting with minority children and youth citizens.
17. Plaintiff, on behalf of The Estate of Honestie Hodges, seeks a declaration that Honestie’s
rights were violated and damages as compensation for the violation of her rights.
-3-
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 11/22/23 Page 4 of 33
18. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
19. This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 and the Fourth and
20. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1343(a) (1), (2), (3), and (4) and the
aforementioned statutory and constitutional provisions, as this action seeks redress for the
21. Plaintiff’s claim for declaratory relief is authorized by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 57, and the general legal and equitable powers of this Court.
22. Plaintiff further invokes the supplemental jurisdiction of this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1367(a) to hear and decide claims arising under state law that are so related to the claims
within the original jurisdiction of this Court that they form part of the same case or
controversy.
23. Plaintiff’s claims are cognizable under the United States Constitution, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
24. Venue is proper in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (b)(2), in that this is the judicial district in which the events
25. The amount in controversy is within the jurisdiction of this Court as Plaintiff’s claimed
26. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
-4-
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 11/22/23 Page 5 of 33
27. Honestie Hodges is now deceased but was at all relevant times a resident of Grand Rapids,
Michigan.
28. Honestie is represented by Plaintiff Whitney Hodges (Honestie’s mother) who was
“Plaintiff”).
29. Defendant City of Grand Rapids (“Defendant Grand Rapids” or “Grand Rapids”) is a
municipal corporation and is a governmental body organized and existing under the
constitution and laws of the State of Michigan, operating as the City of Grand Rapids in
the County of Kent, State of Michigan, and conducts business within the territorial limits
30. Grand Rapids Police Department (“GRPD”) is Defendant Grand Rapids’ law enforcement
body with a self-stated mission to “Protect life and property, prevent crime, and ensure all
people feel safe and are safe at all times throughout our community.”1
31. Defendant David Rahinsky, former Chief of the GRPD, was at all relevant times an agent
and/or employee of Defendant Grand Rapids and is sued in his official capacity.
32. At all relevant times, the GRPD operated under the direction of Defendant Rahinsky, who
was the chief law enforcement officer for the City of Grand Rapids and the final
33. The GRPD is an entity created by and responsible to Defendant City of Grand Rapids, and
Defendant Rahinsky exercised his authority on behalf of and for the benefit of the City of
Grand Rapids.
34. Defendant Rahinsky was responsible for the enforcement of all applicable laws and for the
1
https://public.powerdms.com/GRANDRAPIDS/documents/88410
-5-
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 11/22/23 Page 6 of 33
arrest of all persons who were alleged to have violated the law within the jurisdiction of
35. Further, Defendant Rahinsky was responsible for ensuring that GRPD law enforcement
36. Defendant Spencer Sellner, an officer for the GRPD, was at all relevant times an agent
37. Defendant Anthony Barberino, an officer for the GRPD, was at all relevant times an agent
38. Defendant Jeffrey Dionne, an officer for the GRPD, was at all relevant times an agent
39. Thomas Bush, a sergeant for the GRPD, was at all relevant times an agent and/or employee
40. Jake Bloom, an officer for the GRPD, was at all relevant times an agent and/or employee
41. Patrick Martin, an officer for the GRPD, was at all relevant times an agent and/or employee
42. At all relevant times, Defendants were acting under color of law, under color of statutes,
ordinances, regulations, policies, customs, and usages of the State of Michigan, Defendant
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
43. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
44. This is an action for damages and equitable and injunctive relief against Defendant City of
Grand Rapids, former Chief David Rahinsky, and Officers Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne,
-6-
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 11/22/23 Page 7 of 33
individually, for violating Honestie Hodges’ constitutional rights and other rights accorded
46. In 2017, Honestie was living in the City of Grand Rapids, Kent County, Michigan.
47. On December 6, 2017, Honestie was walking out of her back door with an adult family
49. Honestie’s mother, Whitney Hodges, watched Honestie leave out of the back door.
50. As Honestie was leaving her home, GRPD officers abruptly and unexpectedly advanced
51. Defendant Sellner approached Honestie, who was standing on a step of the porch of her
53. Other officers on the scene also had their guns drawn, including Officer Martin.
54. As Whitney witnessed the aforementioned actions by the GRPD she incredulously repeated
c. “She’s a child”
55. Aisha Rose also repeatedly told officers that Honestie was a child.
-7-
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 11/22/23 Page 8 of 33
56. Nevertheless, Defendant Sellner yelled commands at Honestie to approach him by walking
58. Defendant Barbarino then commanded Honestie to put her right hand behind her back.
60. Defendant Barbarino pulled out his handcuffs and handcuffed Honestie’s hands behind her
back.
61. As Honestie was being handcuffed by Defendant Barbarino she immediately began crying,
62. The sound of Honestie’s cries and screams were obvious cries of a child experiencing
63. Defendant Barbarino told Honestie to “stop yelling” as he was handcuffing her and walking
64. Honestie did not respond to the police in the manner that an adult would respond to law
65. At or around the same time, Officer Bloom handcuffed Ms. Rosa, though Ms. Rosa
informed the officers that she, nor anyone at the Hodges residence, had done anything
wrong.
66. At or around the same time, Officer Sellner handcuffed Whitney Hodges.
67. Neither Honestie, Ms. Rosa, nor Whitney Hodges made any movements to signal that they
were fleeing the police, attempting to evade the officers on the scene, or were an immediate
threat to anyone.
68. Whitney Hodges continued to tell officers that Honestie was an 11-year-old child and
-8-
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 11/22/23 Page 9 of 33
69. To the best of Plaintiff’s knowledge, there were at least three to four squad cars present
70. Honestie, while still handcuffed, was put in the custody of Defendant Jeffrey Dionne.
71. Defendant Dionne walked Honestie to a nearby police car and searched her for weapons.
72. Honestie can be heard crying and saying, “Okay,” and complying with Defendant Dionne’s
commands.
73. While Officer Dionne was walking Honestie to the police car he told Honestie, “Calm
down, you’re not going to jail, okay, we might be at the wrong house.”
74. Defendant Dionne asks Honestie questions, and in between cries, Honestie answers each
question.
75. Defendant Dionne was then instructed by Sergeant Bush to remove the handcuffs from
Honestie.
76. Defendant Dionne removed the handcuffs, sat Honestie in the police car, and closed the
door.
77. While Honestie was detained in the car alone, she continued to cry.
78. It was determined that GRPD was looking for an adult Caucasian woman who had
79. The suspect, an adult Caucasian woman, was described as wearing her hair in a ponytail
80. Honestie is African American and was an 11-year-old child at the time of the incident.
-9-
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.10 Filed 11/22/23 Page 10 of 33
83. At some point during the incident, Defendant Barbarino stated, “We took a child in custody
84. The officer eventually cleared the house and the scene. The suspect they were looking for
85. After the traumatic incident with the officers, Honestie’s suffered extreme emotional and
psychological distress significantly diminishing her quality of life and her ability to cope
86. Honestie had increasing difficulty interacting with authority figures such as parents,
87. As a result of the incident, Honestie experienced panic/anxiety attacks, and required
counseling and medication to address residual symptoms from the trauma caused by
Defendants.
88. Honestie's responses to the trauma caused by Defendants negatively affected her
89. Honestie's responses to the trauma caused by Defendants also interfered with her schooling
90. Honestie’s grandmother, Alisa Niemeyer, filed a complaint with Defendant Grand Rapids
91. Defendant Grand Rapids allegedly investigated the incident and interviewed officers who
2
Barbarino Body Cam Video beginning at T00:36:59Z.
- 10 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.11 Filed 11/22/23 Page 11 of 33
94. Instead, Defendant Grand Rapids reviewed statements given in a news media interview by
95. Defendant Grand Rapids has the ultimate responsibility and authority to investigate the
violation of constitutional rights of any individuals by its officers, and as a matter of acts,
96. Defendant Grand Rapids, failed to adequately and properly investigate the incident
involving Honestie Hodges, including but not limited to failing to perform a thorough
investigation into all of the events relating to the handcuffing and detention of Honestie
Hodges and/or failing to thoroughly review and investigate all policies, practices,
procedures and training materials related to the circumstances surrounding the incident
97. Prior to the incident with Honestie, Defendants Sellner, Barbarino, and Dionne did not
98. Honestie Hodges’ rights were violated because Defendant Grand Rapids, and Defendant
Rahinsky in his capacity as the former chief and final decision maker, tolerated, authorized
99. Defendant Grand Rapids’ failure to adequately train and/or failure to follow proper policy,
- 11 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.12 Filed 11/22/23 Page 12 of 33
100. Defendant Grand Rapids, tolerated, authorized or permitted a custom, policy, practice or
procedure of improper conduct and insufficient supervision, in that they trained their
officers in a method that is designed or is known to cause harm, injury, and trauma to
children/youth citizens.
101. Defendant Grand Rapids, tolerated, authorized or permitted a custom, policy, practice or
adequately screen, counsel, or discipline such individuals as described above, with the
result that said officers were allowed to violate the rights of children/youth citizens such as
Honestie Hodges.
102. Following the incident, then Police Chief David Rahinsky gave a statement to the media
b. The officers’ actions were, “a discredit to the way the community’s being served;”
3
See articles available at https://www.wilx.com/content/news/Grand-Rapids-chief-Handcuffing-
of-girl-11-was-disturbing-463734373.html, and https://www.mlive.com/news/grand-
rapids/2017/12/police_handcuffing_girl_11_dis.html;
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/15/8s/grand-rapids-police-girl-arrested.html.
- 12 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.13 Filed 11/22/23 Page 13 of 33
e. He saw the incident with Honestie, “as a breakdown in the way we police these
situations.”
103. Prior to the incident with Honestie, Defendant Grand Rapids did not provide its employees
104. Prior to the incident with Honestie, Defendant Grand Rapids had no policy for its officers
105. After the incident Chief Rahinsky indicated that GRPD was reviewing its policies,
106. In March 2018, the GRPD adopted the “Honestie Policy” which calls for using the least
107. Defendants’ actions and inactions were in violation of Honestie Hodges’ federal
constitutional rights and other rights accorded to her by common and statutory laws.
108. Defendants’ actions and inactions were also in violation of Michigan common and/or
statutory laws.
109. In whole or in part, as a result of some or all of the above actions and inactions of the
Defendants, Honestie Hodges’ rights were infringed upon as a result of being handcuffed
COUNT I
42 U.S.C. §1983 UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE
U.S. CONST. AMEND. IV
DEFENDANTS SELLNER, BARBERINO, DIONNE
110. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
111. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable
- 13 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.14 Filed 11/22/23 Page 14 of 33
112. Accordingly, the Fourth Amendment prohibits police from subjecting citizens to arrest in the
engaged in wrongdoing.
113. The City of Grand Rapids, through the GRPD, including Defendants Sellner, Barberino,
and Dionne, had a policy, practice, pattern, or custom of seizing, detaining, and/or arresting
114. As described in detail above, Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne seized and
detained Honestie at gunpoint (which by its very nature is a seizure and use of excessive
force), with the use of handcuffs, and by placing her in a police car, in the absence of
probable cause or reasonable suspicion that she had committed any crime.
115. Defendants, by seizing and detaining Honestie in the absence of probable cause or
reasonable suspicion that she had committed a crime, violated Honestie’s clearly
116. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from the illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT II
42 U.S.C. § 1983
FALSE ARREST/FALSE IMPRISONMENT
DEFENDANTS BARBERINO & DIONNE
117. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
- 14 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.15 Filed 11/22/23 Page 15 of 33
118. Honestie Hodges had a clearly established right under the Fourth and Fourteenth
Amendments to the U.S. Constitution to be free from unreasonable seizures of her person.
121. Honestie did not try to flee the presence of the GRPD when she encountered them.
122. Honestie was not armed, believed to be armed, nor did she pose any immediate threat or
danger to anyone.
123. Honestie did not make any movements that caused a threat to any of the GRPD officers on
scene.
124. Defendants Barberino and Dionne’s unreasonable seizure of Honestie escalated events
which led to Honestie being handcuffed and wrongfully imprisoned in a police car.
125. Defendants Barberino and Dionne detained Honestie without probable cause or reasonable
126. Defendants Barberino and Dionne’s acts were objectively and subjectively unreasonable
127. Defendants Barberino and Dionne acted in a deliberate, grossly negligent, and/or reckless
128. In subjecting Honestie to the seizure and detention, Defendants Barberino and Dionne
129. Defendants Barberino and Dionne acted maliciously, with callous or reckless disregard,
actions.
- 15 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.16 Filed 11/22/23 Page 16 of 33
130. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT III
42 U.S.C. § 1983 - EXCESSIVE FORCE
U.S. CONST. AMEND. IV
DEFENDANTS SELLNER AND BARBERINO
131. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
132. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees citizens to be free from
133. The aforementioned acts by Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne were committed
134. As law enforcement officers acting under color of law, Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and
Dionne were required to obey all laws of the United States of America.
135. Based on the totality of the circumstances, Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne’s
136. Defendant Sellner lacked any lawful basis to draw his weapon and point it toward Honestie.
137. The drawing and pointing of the weapon directly towards an unarmed child under the
139. Defendant Dionne lacked any lawful basis to detain Honestie in the back of a police cruiser.
- 16 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.17 Filed 11/22/23 Page 17 of 33
140. When Honestie was handcuffed and detained in the back of a police cruiser, Defendants
141. Honestie was not armed and posed no threat to Defendants Sellner, Barberino, Dionne, or
142. When Honestie was handcuffed and detained in the back of a police cruiser, Defendants
143. When Honestie was handcuffed and detained in the back of a police cruiser, Defendants
144. Upon seeing GRPD officers on scene, some guns drawn, Honestie reacted as a reasonable
145. No reasonable officer would have interpreted Honestie’s cries and screams as a reasonable
146. Defendants Sellner and Barberino’s actions of drawing their weapon and handcuffing
147. The acts were committed by Defendants with callous and/or reckless disregard and/or with
deliberate indifference, and deprived Honestie Hodges of the following clearly established
and well-settled rights, privileges and immunities under the laws and Constitution of the
United States:
a. Freedom from the use of excessive, unreasonable, and deadly force in violation of
Honestie Hodges’ Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights;
- 17 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.18 Filed 11/22/23 Page 18 of 33
b. Freedom from seeking and enjoying equal rights, privileges and immunities of citizens
of the United States and the State of Michigan, including such rights as free speech,
assembly, association and movement, and due process; and,
148. Defendants Sellner and Barberino subjected Honestie to these deprivations of rights
maliciously and/or by acting with callous and/or reckless disregard, and with deliberate
149. Defendants Sellner and Barberino are not afforded the protections of qualified immunity
as their actions with respect to excessive force violate clearly established laws that a
150. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions, Honestie Hodges was deprived of
rights, privileges, and immunities under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United
States Constitution and the laws and Constitution of the State of Michigan.
151. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT IV
42 U.S.C. § 1983 – MUNICIPAL LIABILITY
DEFENDANT CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS
152. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
153. Defendant Grand Rapids has the ultimate responsibility and authority to train and supervise
- 18 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.19 Filed 11/22/23 Page 19 of 33
154. Defendant Grand Rapids had a custom, pattern, practice, and policy of failing to adequately
train and supervise officers of the GRPD in the proper use of force toward children, which
led to a violation of Honestie Hodges’ rights which deprived her of her Constitutional rights
under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution at all times material to this
complaint.
155. Defendant Grand Rapids’ failure to adequately train and supervise officers of the GRPD
regarding multiple and varied proper policies, practices, and procedures ultimately resulted
in harm to Honestie Hodges and includes but is not limited to the following:
a. Failure to adequately train and/or failure to follow proper policy, practice and/or
procedure for using force toward children/youth citizens;
b. Failure to adequately train and/or failure to follow proper policy, practice and/or
procedure with respect to engaging a child/youth citizen;
c. Failure to adequately train and/or failure to follow proper policy, practice and/or
procedure for using essential skills in identifying child/youth citizen who is not a
suspect on a particular call; and,
d. Otherwise failing to adequately train and/or failing to follow proper policy, practice
and/or procedure resulting in the infringement of Honestie Hodges’ constitutional
and federal rights.
156. Defendant Grand Rapids has the ultimate responsibility to establish, promulgate, and enact
157. At the time of Honestie Hodges’ death, Defendant Grand Rapids had no policy, or
inadequate policies, providing for the safe and appropriate policing and interaction with
children citizens.
158. Defendant Grand Rapids has the ultimate responsibility and authority to investigate citizen
complaints that allege harm to a child citizen at the hands of its officers and as a matter of
acts, custom, policy and practice, Defendants Grand Rapids and Rahinsky failed to adequately
- 19 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.20 Filed 11/22/23 Page 20 of 33
and properly investigate complaints related to the incident involving Honestie Hodges,
including but not limited to, failing to perform a thorough investigation into all of the events
relating to the use of force, seizure, and unlawful detainment of Honestie Hodges and failing
to thoroughly review and investigate all policies, practices, procedures, and training materials
159. By these actions and inactions, Defendant Grand Rapids, as a matter of acts, custom, policy
and practice, deprived Honestie Hodges of rights secured by the Fourth and Fourteenth
160. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT V
42 U.S.C. § 1983 – FAILURE TO TRAIN AND SUPERVISE
DEFENDANTS GRAND RAPIDS AND RAHINSKY
161. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
162. Defendants Grand Rapids and Rahinsky had the ultimate responsibility and authority to train
and supervise officers of the GRPD in the appropriate use of force toward children/youth
citizens, de-escalation techniques and methods for interactions with children/youth citizens,
and as a matter of acts, custom, policy, and practice failed to do so with deliberate indifference.
163. Defendants Grand Rapids and Rahinsky had a custom, practice, or policy and failed to
adequately train and/or supervise officers of the GRPD in the proper use of force toward
- 20 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.21 Filed 11/22/23 Page 21 of 33
children, and de-escalation techniques and methods for interactions with children, which led
to a violation of Honestie Hodges’ rights, which deprived her of her Constitutional rights
under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution at all times material to this
complaint.
164. Defendants Grand Rapids and Rahinsky implicitly authorized, approved, or knowingly
failing to adequately train and/or supervise officers of the GRPD regarding proper policy,
a. Failure to adequately train and/or failure to follow proper policy, practice, and/or
procedure for using force toward children/youth citizens;
b. Failure to adequately train and/or failure to follow proper policy, practice, and/or
procedure with respect to engaging a child/youth citizen;
c. Failure to adequately train and/or failure to follow proper policy, practice, and/or
procedure for using essential skills in identifying a child/youth citizen who is not a
suspect on a particular call; and,
165. Defendants Grand Rapids and Rahinsky in their supervisory capacity, had the responsibility
and authority to investigate the infringement of constitutional and federal rights of its youth
citizens and as a matter of acts, custom, policy and/or practice, Defendants failed to
adequately and properly investigate the incident involving Honestie Hodges, including but
not limited to, failing to perform a thorough investigation into all of the events relating to
the death of Honestie Hodges and/or failing to thoroughly review and investigate all
- 21 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.22 Filed 11/22/23 Page 22 of 33
166. By these actions and inactions, Defendants as a matter of acts, custom, policy and practice,
deprived Honestie Hodges of rights secured by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the
167. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT VI
42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS
ALL DEFENDANTS
168. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
169. In practice, Defendant City of Grand Rapids has used its officers to bully, harass, traumatize,
and deprive African American children and youth citizens of their civil liberties.
170. Defendant City of Grand Rapids used Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne to interfere
with Honestie’s property and liberty interests which entitle Honestie the right to bodily
integrity.
171. Defendants’ conduct, either in their individual or collective acts to this abusive
environment, caused Honestie to be detained unlawfully under the color of law grossly
172. Defendants have ignored procedural and substantive Due Process requirements in an
- 22 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.23 Filed 11/22/23 Page 23 of 33
especially African American children who are not suspected of serious criminal activities
or violations.
173. The municipal Defendants have trained their officers and have implemented a policy of
transforming non-serious and simple law enforcement interactions with youth citizens,
especially African American youth citizens into invasive searches and seizures, flouting
174. Defendants’ actions intentionally and willfully deprived Honestie of her property and
liberty interests without due process of law and without recourse for the arbitrary, abusive,
subsequently alleged.
176. Defendants acted willfully, knowingly, and/or purposefully, and with deliberate
177. Due to the nature of Defendants’ conduct, Honestie is entitled to recover punitive damages
178. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions, Honestie was deprived of rights,
privileges, and immunities under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
179. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
- 23 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.24 Filed 11/22/23 Page 24 of 33
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT VII
MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I, § 11
FALSE ARREST
DEFENDANTS SELLNER, BARBERINO, AND DIONNE
180. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
181. Honestie Hodges had a clearly established right under the Michigan Constitution to be free
183. Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne seized and detained Honestie without probable
cause or a reasonable suspicion that Honestie was committing or had committed a crime.
184. Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne’s acts were objectively unreasonable.
185. On December 6, 2017, Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne acted in a deliberate,
grossly negligent, and/or reckless manner when they pointed their firearm at Honestie
(Defendant Sellner), handcuffed Honestie (Defendant Barberino), and seized and detained
186. Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne, in subjecting Honestie to the unlawful seizure,
deprived Honestie of her constitutional and federal rights maliciously, acted with callous or
187. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ actions, Honestie was deprived of rights,
privileges, and immunities under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
- 24 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.25 Filed 11/22/23 Page 25 of 33
188. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT VII
MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I, § 17
DUE PROCESS
ALL DEFENDANTS
189. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
190. In practice, Defendant City of Grand Rapids used its officers to bully, harass, traumatize, and
deprive African American youth citizens and youth citizens of their civil liberties.
191. Defendants City of Grand Rapids used Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne to interfere
with Honestie’s property and liberty interests, which entitles Honestie to the right to bodily
integrity.
192. Defendants’ conduct, either in their individual or collective acts to this abusive
environment, caused Honestie to be detained unlawfully under the color of law grossly
193. Defendants have ignored procedural and substantive Due Process requirements in an
unlawful campaign to harass, punish, and bully youth citizens, especially African
American youth citizens who are not suspected of serious criminal activities or violations.
194. The municipal Defendants have trained their officers and have implemented a policy of
transforming non-serious and simple law enforcement interactions with youth citizens,
- 25 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.26 Filed 11/22/23 Page 26 of 33
especially African American youth citizens into invasive searches and seizures, flouting
195. Defendants’ actions intentionally and willfully deprived Honestie of her property and
liberty interests without due process of law and without recourse for the arbitrary, abusive,
subsequently alleged.
197. Defendants acted willfully, knowingly and/or purposefully, and with deliberate
198. Due to the nature of Defendants’ conduct, Honestie is entitled to recover punitive damages
199. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions, Honestie was deprived of rights,
privileges, and immunities under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
200. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT VIII
GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY - NEGLIGENCE
DEFENDANTS SELLNER, BARBERINO, DIONNE
201. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
- 26 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.27 Filed 11/22/23 Page 27 of 33
202. At all relevant times, Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne were acting in the course of
their employment.
203. Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne owed a general duty to use due care while
204. Duties owed to Honestie Hodges include but are not limited to:
a. The duty to use verbal means such as advice, warning, or persuasion intended to
deescalate the situation before resorting to force;
b. The duty to refrain from using force in where force was not necessary;
d. The duty to use only such force as was necessary and reasonable under the
circumstances;
f. The duty to use no force or the least restrictive amounts of force available as well as
de-escalation techniques and methods toward children/youth citizens; and,
a. Handcuffing Honestie Hodges though she did not fit the description of the criminal
suspect, was not armed, was not fleeing the scene, and was not otherwise resisting the
officers in any manner;
f. Failing to use skills to deescalate the emotional trauma inflicted upon a youth
citizen who is not a suspect on a particular call; and,
- 27 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.28 Filed 11/22/23 Page 28 of 33
206. Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne committed acts of gross negligence including but
not limited to, pointed their firearm at Honestie (Defendant Sellner), handcuffed Honestie
(Defendant Barberino), and seized and detained Honestie (Defendants Barberino and
Dionne).
207. The aforementioned acts, carried out in the absence of probable cause or reasonable
suspicion that a crime was being or had been committed, were so reckless as to demonstrate
208. Defendants breached the duties owed to Honestie Hodges and were grossly negligent as that
term is used and defined in M.C.L. 691.1407(2) (c) (the Governmental Tort Liability Act or
“GTLA”), when they conducted themselves by actions and inactions described above, said
acts and omissions having been committed with reckless and willful disregard for Honestie’s
health, safety, Constitutional and/or statutory rights, and with a substantial lack of concern as
209. Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne are not afforded the protections of
governmental immunity under MCL 691.1407 et seq. as their actions and inactions as
210. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
- 28 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.29 Filed 11/22/23 Page 29 of 33
211. Defendants are liable for the aforementioned injuries under MCL 691.1407(2) and
Michigan law.
COUNT IX
ASSAULT & BATTERY
DEFENDANTS SELLNER, BARBERINO, AND DIONNE
212. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
213. Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne committed, or acted in concert to commit, acts
which caused Honestie Hodges to be apprehensive that Defendants would subject her to an
imminent battery and intentional invasions of her rights to be free from offensive and
harmful contact.
214. Said conduct by Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne demonstrated that the
offensive and harmful touching. Honestie Hodges did not consent to such conduct, which
215. Defendants Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne for the very purpose of causing harm, and in
217. The acts described above constitute assault and battery, actionable under the laws of the
State of Michigan.
218. Defendants committed, or acted in concert to commit, acts that resulted in harmful or
219. Honestie Hodges did not consent to the contact, which caused injury, damage, loss, and/or
harm.
- 29 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.30 Filed 11/22/23 Page 30 of 33
220. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
COUNT X
FALSE IMPRISONMENT
DEFENDANTS SELLNER, BARBERINO, AND DIONNE
221. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
222. Defendant Sellner engaged in the unlawful restraint of Honestie Hodges’ liberty and
223. Defendant Barberino engaged in the unlawful restraint of Honestie Hodges’ liberty and
224. Defendant Dionne engaged in the unlawful restraint of Honestie Hodges’ liberty and
225. The aforementioned Defendants thereby engaged in these restraints with both express and
226. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and/or inactions, Honestie Hodges
psychological and emotional distress, and physical pain and suffering, and it is believed that
her diminished emotional and physical condition as a result of the trauma she endured and its
lasting effects led to the weakening of her body and made her more susceptible to
complications from illness that contributed to and ultimately caused her death.
- 30 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.31 Filed 11/22/23 Page 31 of 33
227. The paragraphs above are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
228. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants Grand Rapids, Rahinsky, Sellner, Barberino,
and Dionne’s actions and/or inactions stated above, Honestie Hodges suffered serious
mental anguish, anxiety, emotional distress, a sense of outrage, loss of social pleasure and
229. The conduct, actions and/or inactions of Defendants as alleged in the above-stated counts
and causes of action constitute violations of the common and/or statutory laws of the State
of Michigan, and the United States District Court has supplemental jurisdiction to hear and
230. Plaintiff, on behalf of the estate and all individuals entitled to damages under the wrongful
death act, request all damages that are fair and just under the circumstances, including, without
b. Reasonable compensation for pain and suffering Honestie experienced while she was
unlawfully detained and thereafter; and,
c. Losses suffered by Plaintiff and Honestie’s next of kin as a result of Honestie’s death,
including but not limited to the following:
Honestie Hodges, requests this Court and the finder of fact to enter a Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor
and against Defendants Grand Rapids, Rahinsky, Sellner, Barberino, and Dionne on all counts as
indicated above in an amount consistent with the proofs of trial, and seeks against Defendants all
appropriate damages arising out of law, equity and fact for each or all of the above counts where
- 31 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.32 Filed 11/22/23 Page 32 of 33
applicable and requests that the trier of fact, be it judge or jury, award Plaintiff all applicable
damages, including but not limited to compensatory, special, exemplary and/or punitive, in
whatever amount the Plaintiff is entitled, and all other relief arising out of law, equity and fact,
Respectfully submitted,
- 32 -
Case 1:23-cv-01230 ECF No. 1, PageID.33 Filed 11/22/23 Page 33 of 33
JURY DEMAND
and through her attorneys, DREW COOPER & ANDING, hereby demands a trial by jury on all
Respectfully submitted,
- 33 -