Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Airquality
Airquality
net/publication/335797404
Inferring air pollution from air quality index by different geographical areas:
case study in India
CITATIONS READS
7 509
8 authors, including:
Ishaani Priyadarshini
University of Delaware
36 PUBLICATIONS 135 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ishaani Priyadarshini on 16 September 2019.
Abstract
India is one of the most polluted countries in the world, where several major cities are facing serious environmental consequences
as a result of rapid pollution growth. The objective of this research is to analyze air pollution trends with respect to various
geographical locations, in order to have a global view of the damage caused, so that appropriate actions can be developed in the
future to prevent air pollution. In this regard, the polluted database was established based on the data provided by the Central
Pollution Control Board; Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (India). These data demonstrate the annual
growth of SO2, NOx, and particulate matter (PM) 2.5 from 2015 to 2018 and were recorded at various monitoring stations in three
cities, namely, Delhi, Bengaluru, and Chennai. The results show that SO2, NOx, and PM 2.5 were from different transport modes,
both small or large-scale power generations (from diesel, coal and gas plant), industries, constructions, and domestic cooking.
Overall, there was an increasing trend, day by day, in India. The result categorized the considered areas into the following four
classes: critically polluted (CP), highly polluted (HP), moderately polluted (MP), and low polluted (LP). The results will assist in
the assessment of pollution for the cities investigated in this research.
Keywords Air pollution . Air pollutants . Environmental health . Exceedance factor . Data analysis
6
1
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, SRM Geographic Information Science Research Group, Ton Duc Thang
Institute of Science and Technology, Ghaziabad, India University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, LNCT College, 7
Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang
Bhopal, India
University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
3
VNU Information Technology Institute, Vietnam National
University, Hanoi, Vietnam 8
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, LNCT
4
University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA University, Bhopal, MP, India
Air Qual Atmos Health
still a big problem that needs more efforts in order to have safe (2019) determined the PM 2.5 data between 2000 and 2015
air quality levels. using NASA remote sensing images. Zheng et al. (2018) per-
In India, air pollution is a more severe problem. Today, formed analysis for the forest cover effect on urban PM 2.5 in
India incorporates 640 districts, and out of this, 27% exceeded China. Wang et al. (2019) developed artificial neural networks
the annual standard value of 40 μg/m3 in 1998, and 45% for the online monitoring data of air pollutants in order to
exceeded it in 2010 (Guttikunda et al. 2019). Thus, of the identify the instrument failure. Cardozo and Sánchez (2019)
top 10 most polluted cities in the world list released by the measured the meteorological parameters, vehicle traffic, and
World Health Organization, nine cities are from India, and concentration of particulate matter at different locations.
among them, Delhi remains at sixth position (Yuda 2019). In terms of air pollution, it is well known that SO2 is very
The WHO database further mentioned that Delhi is the most harmful for the human body, and a few of the major health
polluted city for PM 10 (Donkelaar et al. 2016; WHO 2018). effects are lung dysfunction, inflammation of the respiratory
Thus, this situation is a complicated issue, which strongly tract and mucous membranes, and irritation of the eyes. SO2 is
influences human health, and a demanding solution is re- a gas that is soluble and colorless and is formed as a result of
quired in order to maintain the air quality level. the combustion of fuels like petrol, diesel, and coal that con-
Monitoring air quality plays a vital role in controlling the tain sulfur. Thus, this pollutant is also responsible for asthma
levels of pollution (Camastra et al. 2019). Thus, it is very attacks, lung disease, heart aggravation, and respiratory dis-
important to quantify the air quality levels by different loca- ease in children. Thermal power plants are also the major
tions in order to see the effect of air pollution on human health. sources of SO2 (Darryl 2017); however, diesel vehicles are
Schwela (2012) stated that an air pollution map could be very also a main source of SO2. According to Hedley et al.
useful for managing air quality and its effects. However, air (2002), there is an association between mortality and SO2. It
quality management stations (AQM) are not always available is the sad truth that NOx and SO2 pollutants are important
in developing cities because of their set-up costs. factors for sudden death (Dales et al. 2004). The efforts of
Nevertheless, in order to determine air pollution effects accu- the studies resulted in a decreased usage of sulfur in many
rately, the solution is to increase number of the AQM stations, countries. The results show that SO2 levels are reducing year
to allow for wider and more comprehensive coverage. by year in some locations around the world.
Literature reviews show that many methods have been con- In a few cities in Canada, NOx and SO2 are high-impact
sidered for air pollution research, ranging from statistical anal- risk factors for sudden death. NOx is a combination of NO2
yses to sophisticated models. Biswas et al. (2011) analyzed and NO pollutant concentrations. The major sources of NOx
24-h, 8-h, and 1-h averaged criteria pollutants (PM 2.5, SO2, are vehicle exhausts like diesel, petrol, liquid petroleum gas
NO2, PM 10, and CO) at three different sites in India, that is, (LPG), and compressed natural gas (CNG). PM (airborne par-
Sirifort, Delhi College of Engineering, and the Income Tax ticulate matter) is a combination of chemical compositions,
Office in Delhi. Kumar and Goyal (2011a) developed a fore- solids, and various sizes of liquid particles. The main sources
casting model for predicting the daily air quality indices (AQI) of PM primary particles are direct emissions like diesel soot.
in Delhi, which can be used as a basis for decision-making Sources of the PM secondary particles are gases with a phys-
processes. Kumar and Goyal (2011b) estimated the AQI with icochemical transformation, like sulfate and nitrate (Limaye
SO2, NO2, respirable suspended particulate matter (RSPM), and Salvi 2010). Basically, PM has been categorized into the
and suspended particulate matter (SPM) pollutants using the following three groups (Kim et al. 2015): PM 2.5 (diameter <
principal components regression (PCR) technique, in Delhi. 2.5 μm), PM 2.5–10 (coarse particles), and PM 10 (diameter
Ayala et al. (2011) discussed the sources and pollutants < 10 μm). The primary particles of PM consist of the carbon
associated with the effects on health as well as the risk emitted from trucks, cars, stone crushing, and burning waste.
posed to health by different sources of air pollution. Hoque PM particles are from natural sources, which include volca-
et al. (2014) determined the noise level at some specific loca- noes, oceans, and ground (Limaye and Salvi 2010). WHO
tions of Tangail, India. Kumar and Goyal (2012) forecasted explained that PM particles can penetrate into the respiratory
the daily AQI through a neural network based on principal tract with a high penetrability. They can easily enter into the
component analysis (PCA). Chinnaswamy et al. (2016) in- lungs and can affect the functioning. In general, PM is the
ferred potential health implication through a trend analysis. cause of many major diseases, and is more dangerous to hu-
Heinrich (2018) discussed the outdoor air pollutants (PM 2.5 man health and life than other pollutants. The studies conduct-
and NO2) accompanied with precaution needs to be taken for ed in the past are bound to a limited number of places and are
reducing the effect of these pollutants. Ramasamy (2018) not up-to-date.
discussed the Comprehensive Environmental Pollution In this research, we analyzed air pollution trends in the case
Index (CEPI) for evaluating the quality of environment. study of three cities in India, namely, Delhi, Bengaluru, and
Khazaei et al. (2018) predicted the concentration of indoor Chennai, over the period of 2015–2018. SO2, NOx, and PM
air carbon dioxide by temperature and humidity. Wang et al. 2.5 are the three air quality indices (AQI) demonstrated in the
Air Qual Atmos Health
analysis. The data have been collected through the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) monitors the complete air qual-
Pollution Control Board; Ministry of Environment, Forest, ity monitoring networks and sets the standard that needs to be
and Climate Change; India. The obtained results display followed by every pollution control unit. It is noted that there are
how pollution is increasing day by day in these major cities. 703 air quality stations across 307 cities in India. This program is
The map result was categorized into the following four differ- completely managed by the Central Pollution Control Board, in
ent classes: critically polluted (CP), highly polluted (HP), collaboration with the state pollution control board (Pant et al.
moderately polluted (MP), and low polluted (LP). The results 2018). Most of the air quality stations are deployed in urban areas
will assist in the assessment of pollution for the cities con- (Balakrishnan et al. 2014).
cerned in this research.
Exceedance factor
The annual average levels of SO2, PM 2.5, and NOx are col-
Methodology lected for seven different locations for the years 2015–2018.
According to the standards and area classes described by the
Materials CPCB, the concentration of pollutants’ range can be calculat-
ed using an exceedance factor (EF), as stated below (CPCB
This study considered seven critically polluted locations in 2016):
India, as shown in Table 1. The pollution trends were derived
based on data from 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. The param- pollutant annual mean concentration
EF ¼ ð1Þ
eters considered for this research were SO2, NOx, and PM 2.5. Annual standard for pollutant
For the concerned locations, we collected the geography and
some of the related characteristics, incorporating three mega By using this expression, pollution for the years 2014–
cities of India, namely Delhi, Bengaluru, and Chennai. The 2018 in terms of four pollutants can be measured. The air
populations of Bengaluru and Chennai are both more than 10 pollution can be analyzed using following criterion: low pol-
million, whereas Delhi has an estimated population of 18.6 lution (L)—EF < 0.5; moderate pollution (M)—EF 0.5–1.0;
million. It is noted that Chennai is one of the most popular high pollution (H)—EF 1.0–1.5; and critical pollution (C)—
metropolitan cities in India. In this city, the SO2 concentration EF > 1.5.
increased by 30% during 2011 and 2012. In 2015, the SO2
concentration was at its peak. After 2015, because of the use Air quality index
of low sulfur fuel, the SO2 concentrations have been under
compliance in Chennai. Some industries are now operating on The air quality index (AQI) is used for the effective assess-
gas and electricity (Guttikunda et al. 2019). Bengaluru—the ment of air quality. This process transforms the data of various
capital of Karnataka—is an unplanned city, where the popu- pollutants into a single number or value. AQI is categorized
lation increases year by year. into the following six different categories: good, satisfactory,
Three pollutants, namely SO2, NOx, and PM 2.5, are collected moderately polluted, poor, very poor, and severe. The AQ
from various nodes deployed by the Central Pollution Control sub-index was developed for tracking eight pollutants (PM
Board; Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change; 2.5, PM 10, SO2, NO2, CO, NH3, O3, and Pb). The calculation
India. The monitoring of pollutants is carried out on a yearly of the AQ sub-index is based on the ambient concentration of
basis, with a twice a week frequency. In India, the Central air pollutants, which is a linear function of the concentration
96.85% to 4.95 μg/m3. In 2015, the SO2 level in Velachery, units, are taking advantage of its proximity to a port.
Chennai Res. Area, was very high at 155.3 μg/m3. In 2015, Chennai handles 30% of the auto industry in India. The
the pollution level in Chennai was higher than that of presence of large commercial ports is the major reason for
Delhi. Finally, the SO2 level in Velachery remained well the highest freight movements in and out on the Chennai
under the standard 40 μg/m3. The SO2 level for Punjabi streets in the country. It also leads in terms of the emis-
Bagh, Delhi, was 18.74 μg/m3 in 2015, and after three sions of pollutants from unregistered vehicles in Chennai.
years, it rapidly increased by 10.9% to 20.79 μg/m 3. Every day, more than 700 new vehicles go to the Chennai
The SO2 level for Punjabi Bagh rapidly increased over streets, which is the biggest contributor to increasing sul-
the years. Despite the variation in levels from 2015 to fur dioxide levels in Chennai. Because of these issues, the
2018, the SO2 level remained well under the standard SO2 level in Chennai is very high.
40 μg/m3 for Punjabi Bagh, Delhi. In Shadipur, Delhi, Table 5 demonstrates the EF and pollution level for SO2
the SO2 level in 2015 was 7.84 μg/m3, and it gradually over the period of 2015 to 2018. In Fig. 2, we can analyze
increased by 55.1% to 12.16 μg/m3. In 2016, it increased whether an area is critically polluted or not. It was suggested
rapidly to 17.25 μg/m 3, but gradually came down to to reduce the sulfur content in fuels (Hedley et al. 2002). Our
6.89 μg/m3 in 2017. Despite the variations in the levels results confirmed this observation.
from 2015 to 2018, the SO2 level remained well under the
standard 40 μg/m3 for Shadipur, Delhi. Analysis with respect to NOX
Chennai is the capital of Tamil Nadu, and it is one of
the metropolitan cities in India. Because of its proximity According to Fig. 3 and Table 6, it can be seen that the NOx
to the bay of Bangal, access to East Asia markets is very level tends to decrease in some of the determined areas, but it
easy from Chennai. As a result of this connectivity with also has the trend of increasing in the remaining areas.
these Asian markets, Chennai is an important port city. The decrease and increase in percentage for the seven deter-
Chennai is like a hub station for chemical, automobile, mined areas over the period of 2015 to 2018 are as follows: R K
trade and shipping, and petrochemical industries. Many Puram (Delhi) 6.1% increase; Anand Vihar (Delhi) 48.1% de-
big manufactures, like Hyundai, Ford, Ashok Leyland, crease; Peenya (Bengaluru) 6.1% decrease; IHBAS, Dilshad
Mitsubishi, and other manufacturing and engineering Garden (Delhi) 30.3% increase; Velachery Res. Area
Table 5 Exceedance factor (EF) and the pollution level for SO2 pollutant in 2015–2018. L—low pollution; M—moderate pollution; C—critical
pollution
(Chennai) 85.32% decrease; Punjabi Bagh (Delhi) 7.6% in- rapidly to 109.16 μg/m3. Anand Vihar, Delhi, is the top
crease; and Shadipur (Delhi) 14.3% increase. most polluted area in Delhi. The NOx level for Anand
In R K Puram, Delhi, the NO x level in 2015 was Vihar, Delhi, is also very high and is more than the stan-
71.36 μg/m3, and after three years, it gradually decreased dard value of 40 μg/m3. In Peenya, Bengaluru industrial
by 6.1% to 67.01 μg/m3. R K Puram, Delhi, is the most area, the NOx level in 2015 was 14.69 μg/m 3, and it
polluted area in Delhi (CPCB 2016). In 2016, it increased decreased by 6.1% to 13.8 μg/m3. In 2017, it increased
rapidly to 72.38 μg/m 3, but gradually came down to rapidly to 30.07 μg/m 3, but gradually came down to
42.91 μg/m3 in 2017. The NOx level for R K Puram, 13.8 μg/m3 in 2018. Finally, the NOx level in Peenya
Delhi, is very high and is more than the standard value remained well under the standard of 40 μg/m3. The NOx
of 40 μg/m3. The NOx level for Anand Vihar, Delhi, was level for IHBAS, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, was 35.5 μg/m3
76.94 μg/m3 in 2015, and after three years, it rapidly in 2015, and it rapidly increased by 30.3% to 46.28 μg/
increased by 48.1% to 114.32 μg/m3. In 2017, it increased m3. The NOx level for IHBAS rapidly increased over the
years. The NOx level for IHBAS, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, Analysis with respect to PM 2.5
is also very high and is more than the standard value of
40 μg/m3. According to Fig. 5 and Table 8, it can be seen that the PM 2.5
In the Velachery Res. Area, Chennai, the NOx level in 2015 level decreases in some of the determined areas, and also
was 125.08 μg/m3, and it decreased by 85.32% to 18.35 μg/ increases in the remaining areas.
m3. In 2015, the NOx level in Velachery, Chennai Res. Area, The decreasing and increasing percentages for the sev-
was found to be very high, with 125.08 μg/m3. In 2015, the en determined areas between 2015 and 2018 are as fol-
pollution level in Chennai was higher than in Delhi. Finally, lows: RKPuram (Delhi) 7.8% increase; Anand Vihar
the NOx level in Velachery remained well under the stan- (Delhi) 4.5% decrease; Peenya (Bengaluru) 23.6% de-
dard 40 μg/m3. The NOx level for Punjabi Bagh, Delhi, was crease; IHBAS, Dilshad Garden (Delhi) 13.8% increase;
73.49 μg/m3 in 2015. The NOx level for Punjabi Bagh rap- Velachery Res. Area (Chennai) 61.32% decrease; Punjabi
idly increased and is more than the standard value of 40 μg/ Bagh (Delhi) 6.9% increase; Shadipur (Delhi) 3.5%
m3. In Shadipur, Delhi, the NOx level in 2015 was 64.41 μg/ increase.
m3, and after three years, it gradually decreased by 14.3% to In R K Puram, Delhi, the PM 2.5 level in 2015 was
55.14 μg/m3. The NOx level for Shadipur, Delhi, is very 114.35 μg/m3, and after three years, it increased by 7.8% to
high, and is more than the standard value of 40 μg/m3. As 123.44 μg/m3. R K Puram, Delhi, is the most polluted area in
vehicle exhaust emissions are the major sources of NOx, one Delhi, according to the report of Central Pollution Control
way of decreasing this pollutant level is to stop launching Board (CPCB). In 2016, it increased rapidly to 132.18 μg/
new vehicles in the determined areas, as registered vehicles m3 but reduced to 90.45 μg/m3 in 2017. The PM 2.5 level
in India are rapidly increasing year after year. The same for R K Puram, Delhi, is very high, and is more than the
solution can be applied to SO2 pollutants. Table 7 demon- standard value (30 μg/m3). The PM 2.5 level for Anand
strates the EF and pollution level for NOx in 2015–2018. We Vihar, Delhi, was 156.25 μg/m3 in 2015, and it increased by
can easily analyze whether the area is critically polluted or 4.5% to 163.25 μg/m3. In 2017, it increased rapidly to
not (Fig. 4). 190.82 μg/m3. Anand Vihar, Delhi, is the top most polluted
Table 7 Exceedance factor (EF) and pollution level for NOx in 2015–2018
area in Delhi. The PM 2.5 level for Anand Vihar, Delhi, is also Dilshad Garden, Delhi, is also very high, and is more than
very high, and is more than the standard value (30 μg/m3). the standard value (30 μg/m3). In the Velachery Res. Area,
The Peenya industrial area of Bengaluru witnessed a PM Chennai, the PM 2.5 level in 2015 was 103.71 μg/m3, and it
2.5 level of 37.05 μg/m3 in 2015, and after three years, it rapidly decreased by 61.32% to 40.11 μg/m3. In 2015, the PM
decreased by 23.6% to 28.3 μg/m3. In 2017, it increased rap- 2.5 level in Velachery, Chennai Res. Area was very high at
idly to 44.96 μg/m3, but gradually came down to 28.3 μg/m3 103.71 μg/m3. In 2015, the pollution level in Chennai was
in 2018. Finally, the PM 2.5 level in Peenya remained very higher than in Delhi. After adopting preventive measures, it
high, and was more than the standard value (30 μg/m3). The decreased rapidly to 40.11 μg/m3, but was still more than the
PM 2.5 level for IHBAS, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, was standard value of 30 μg/m3.
121.8 μg/m3 in 2015, and after three years, it decreased by The PM 2.5 level for Punjabi Bagh, Delhi, was 122.23 μg/
13.8% to 104.94 μg/m3. The PM 2.5 level for IHBAS, m3 in 2015, and it increased by 6.9% to 130.68 μg/m3. The
PM 2.5 level for Punjabi Bagh rapidly increased over the increased by 30.3%. The NOx level for IHBAS, Dilshad
years, and it is the most polluted area in Delhi. The PM 2.5 Garden, Delhi, is also very high, and is more than the
level for Punjabi Bagh, Delhi, is very high, and is more than standard value (40 μg/m3). Anand Vihar is the top most
the standard value (30 μg/m3). In Shadipur, Delhi, the PM 2.5 polluted area in Delhi. The NOx level for Anand Vihar,
level in 2015 was 119.94 μg/m3, and after three years, it de- Delhi is also very high, and is more than the standard
creased by 3.5% to 115.65 μg/m3. The PM 2.5 level for value (40 μg/m3).
Shadipur, Delhi, is very high, and is more than the standard The analysis in this study also investigated the areas
value (30 μg/m3). Figure 6 and Table 9 demonstrate the EF with high PM 2.5 levels. Because vehicle exhaust emis-
and pollution level for SO2 for the years 2015 to 2018. From sions are a major source of these three pollution elements,
the results obtained, we can easily analyze if the area is criti- namely SO2, NOx, and PM 2.5, the fundamental solution
cally polluted or not. to decrease pollutant levels might be achieved by
preventing the further launch of new vehicles in these
areas. Another suggestion is to use the spatial interpola-
Discussion and conclusion tion techniques to overcome the limitation of fixed the air
quality monitoring system. Spatial interpolation tech-
The important issue is that pollution increases day by day niques will help to predict the pollutant concentration in
because of the high number of industries and development the unmonitored regions. Geographic information system
activities. In India, the major sources of SO2, NOx, and (GIS) is also a very popular tool for creating an analysis
PM 2.5 are mainly related to the diesel exhaust, fossil fuel of the environment.
burning, petrol, LPG, and CNG. When the SO2 levels in The analysis of the study is estimated based on the
IHBAS, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, and Shadipur were com- exceedance factor, using SO 2 , NO x , and PM 2.5 in
pared, it was observed that Delhi has a very high SO2 Delhi, Bengaluru, and Chennai. It has been demonstrated
level, which is above the standard pollution level. This that the annual growth of SO2, NOx, and PM 2.5 in Delhi,
high pollutant level might be the reason for many health Bengaluru, and Chennai, as well as the considered areas,
issues and multiple deaths for specific areas. The NOx has also been categorized into four different classes,
level for IHBAS, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, rapidly namely C (critically polluted), H (highly polluted), M
(moderately polluted), and L (low polluted). As our sur- possible reduction in the sources of the pollutants con-
vey report suggests, Delhi, Chennai, and Bengaluru be- cerned, and to help with the decision-making process for
long to the most polluted cities in India, on the basis of actions to take regarding human health in the coming
their emission and energy consumption. Therefore, the years of 2019–2020.
concluded forecasting of pollutants for the concerned cit- For further studies, we are planning to work on the above
ies from 2015 to 2018 will be helpful for providing this methods to monitor the unmonitored locations by using mea-
information to the public, in order to take the necessary sured locations. This will provide researchers with enough
measures and to protect their health. The analysis can also data to determine the hotspots for air pollutant concentrations,
be used by the government and authorities to create a as well as the health characteristics for the given area.
Table 9 Exceedance factor (EF) and pollution level for PM 2.5 in 2015–2018