Example Claim of Lien and Conditional Acceptance

This is the instruction page.
Modify the rest of the document paying close

attention to the blue highlighted sections. Remove what does not apply to
you and add to the facts of your situation in the appropriate place shown.
FIRST MIDDLE LAST (use ©™ if you have your name copyrighted and trademarked)
Grantor and Trustee
Name of Trust
Claimant and Secured Party
Without Prejudice
c/o 123 Anywhere
City, State Spelled Out [12345]
Instrument-Number
_______________________________________
RF 123 456 789 US
In the State
County County
_______________________________________
This is a Security Claim of Commercial Lien (Title 15 Code of the United States) and Conditional Acceptance. This claim
is tendered for the purpose of remedy and relief for the claimant. This is a Commercial Lien and is not a Lis Pendens-
Lien.
Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance
I, FIRST MIDDLE LAST, depose and say as follows:
This Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance is registered as a matter of public record against Lien-
Debtor(s) in concert with a properly executed private contract under commercial law as a voluntary lien based on
consensual actions by knowledgeable execution of contract (explained herein).
____________________________________________________________
Lien-Creditor
FIRST MIDDLE LAST

Without Prejudice
c/o 123 Anywhere
City, State Spelled Out [12345]
Lien-Debtor(s)
(Go to dnb.com and search for every corporation who has violated your rights. The court in each state goes by the
name Judiciary Courts of the State of State, the Division of Child Support usually falls under the State Department
of Revenue, under the Child Support Clearinghouse. There are subsidiary/parent corporations with branches and
d/b/a’s [doing business as] a few times over to mask the parent corporation. You must find the parent corporation
as well as the lower level corporation on dnb.com and get their D-U-N-N number to lien. Lien every branch of the
County of County, City of City, in the city and county that you live in, who have allowed for your rights to be
violated. The sheriff’s department should fall under the County of County. If any person has violated your rights
you get the corporation they are employed by and all of the principals and lien them all. They are all accountable.
Dnb.com usually shows the key principal. List them. There is a separate search page for Duns numbers. You can
search for the company on this page and copy and paste their names and addresses then go to the home page
search and enter the company name and choose them one by one and get the details for them, such as key principal
1
and address, and their d/b/a’s. Anyone violating your rights, working for these corporations, need to be listed
behind Agent, right underneath All Principals.)
STATE OF STATE
State of State
Key Principal:
All Principals
Agent:
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

STATE OF STATE
D-U-N-S number: 123456789
STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

State Department of Finance and Administration
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Subsidiary

STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Branch

STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

State Department of Public Safety
Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345

Your-State Department of Public Safety
JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF STATE

2
Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Subsidiary (There is a subsidiary court in each State over all of the courts and this is the District Court)

Judiciary Courts of The State of State
JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF STATE

Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Branch

Judiciary Courts of The State of State
COUNTY OF COUNTY
County of County
Doing Business As:
Headquarters
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345

COUNTY OF COUNTY
COUNTY OF COUNTY
County of County
Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Branch

COUNTY OF COUNTY
(The police department is a branch under the City of City that you live in. Be sure to list any police
officers who violated your rights underneath the branch location. Just match up the addresses and you
3
can figure out which branch belongs to the police department, even if it isn’t listed as doing business as:
the police department, you can figure it out by matching up the addresses.)
CITY OF CITY
City of City
Doing Business As:
Headquarters
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345

City of City
CITY OF CITY
City of City
Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Branch

City of City
STATE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Key Principal: Name of Attorney General
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Subsidiary
Your-State Office of Attorney General
STATE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Key Principal: Name of Attorney General
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Branch
Your-State Office of Attorney General
STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE

Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
4
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Subsidiary
STATE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY COMMISSION (or similar for your State)
Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Subsidiary

Your-State Department of Human Services
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Branch
Your-State Department of Human Services
State House of Representatives

Doing Business As:
Key Principal:
All Principals
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
Branch

House of Representatives, State
____________________________________________________________
With Completion of Service and designation of Witnesses To:

5
United States President, Trustee of the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust
The Whitehouse
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500
Registered Mail Number: RF 123 456 789 US/Return Receipt Number: 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 12
Antony-J: Blinken, Trustee of the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, ANTONY J. BLINKEN d/b/a United
States Secretary of State
Office of the Secretary of State

2201 C Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20520
Certified Mail Number: 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234/Return Receipt Number: 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 12
Merrick-B: Garland, Trustee of the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and; MERRICK B. GARLAND
d/b/a United States Attorney General, a taxpayer
United States D.O.J.,

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Janet-Louise: Yellen, Trustee of the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and; JANET LOUISE YELLEN
d/b/a United States Secretary of the Treasury, a taxpayer
Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W..
First Middle Last, Trustee of the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and; FIRST MIDDLE LAST d/b/a
State Attorney General
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
First Middle Last, Trustee of the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and; FIRST MIDDLE LAST d/b/a
State Treasurer of State
123 Anywhere
City, State 12345
I hereby address Trustees in your human capacities as living men and women, and; I hereby claim and exercise my right
to Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent and Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal, and; service upon one is service
upon all.
Notice of “Priority” Claim: Whereby, this serves as notice to you that, I, FIRST MIDDLE LAST, am Grantor and
Trustee of the Trust Name. This trust is conducting international trade in commerce and has superior standing over the
6
FIRST MIDDLE LAST Cestui Que Trust in the operations of commerce and international trade, and all operations of this
FIRST MIDDLE LAST Cestui Que Trust is interfering in a commercial capacity with the operations of the Trust Name.
Dear Name of State Attorney General,
You are in receipt of this presentment, Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance, as Attorney General
for the State of State, and as Trustee of the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, and associated, FIRST MIDDLE LAST Cestui Que
(Vie) Trust (This is for your offspring), and;
To serve as Mail-Acceptor for the above referenced,

Trustees, Principals, and Listed Agents of Lien-Debtor(s)
Please see to it that said Principals and listed agents are apprised of this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional
Acceptance and forward accordingly. In that notice to agent is notice to principal, and notice to principal is notice to
agent, said Principals are deemed to have been served and apprised of this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional
Acceptance through You, Tim Griffin, as Mail-Acceptor.
This Claim of Commercial Lien is a Consensual Lien/Obligation on the part of the Lien-Debtor(s), arising out of a private
contract executed between Lien-Claimant and Lien-Debtor(s) for the served security from the signed and accepted USPS
Registered Mail Number RF 123 456 789 US. Said Lien-Claimant initiated said contract in order to protect Lien-Claimant
from the liabilities assumed by the Lien-Debtor(s).
I, YOUR-NAME, lien, arrest, claim, and seize for damages and fees the following:
1. Any and all bonds including the performance bond, documents, commercial paper, contracts, assets and moneys
thereof.
2. The State Code Annotated and the Uniform Commercial Code, and any and all bonds, documents, commercial
paper, assets and moneys of both.
3. All D-U-N-S® Numbers and any and all documents, commercial paper, contracts, assets and moneys thereof.
All the foregoing is liened, arrested, claimed, and seized for settlement for the following acts against me:
1. Denial of Due Process;
2. Theft of property;
3. Forcing me into contracts against my will;
4. Conspiracy to deny rights under color of law;
5. Deprivation of rights under color of law;
6. Human trafficking;
7. Using something other than gold or silver coins for payment of debt;
8. Racketeering and extortion;
9. Denial of right to travel freely in private;
10. Treason against me, one of “the People”;
11. Failure to Protect
7
This Claim of Lien shall be against all Personal, Real, and Moveable Property of the Lien-Debtor wherever it may be
found.
This Claim of Lien is filed pursuant to the Fundamental Commercial Law that has existed for nearly 4,000 years:
“The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any
judicial determination of probable cause, dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times.” United
States Supreme Court, 1969 Sniadich v. family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349.
I. Pertinent Law(s):
1. Denial of Due Process:
Under both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution1, neither the federal government nor state
governments may deprive any person “of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” The cardinal precept is that
where there is a violation of basic constitutional rights, courts are ousted from their jurisdiction. The violation of a party’s
right to due process raises a serious jurisdictional issue which cannot be glossed over or disregarded at will. Where the
denial of the fundamental right of due process is apparent, a decision rendered in disregard of that right is void for lack of
jurisdiction. (Emphases supplied). The Supreme Court said that the "rights of life and personal liberty are the natural
rights of man. To secure these rights … governments are instituted among men" U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 2 Otto
542, 23 L. Ed. 588
A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction, for a basic issue in any case before a tribunal is its power to
act, and a court must have the authority to decide that question the first instance.” Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of
Los Angeles, 171 P2d 8: 331 US 549, 91 K, ed, 1666m 67 S, Ct, 1409
Trezevant v. City of Tampa: Standard judicial operating procedures (SOP) can never over rule obstruction of justice or
due process; ……………..
28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge
of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
……………..
Executive Order 13818 of December 20, 2017 - Blocking the Property of Persons involved in Serious Human Rights
Abuse or Corruption. By the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Emergency
Economic Act (50 U.S.C. 1710 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1610 et. seq) (NEA), section
212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code.
Justice is required to be BLIND while holding a SET OF SCALES and a TWO-EDGED SWORD. This symbolizes
true justice. The Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 (60 stat 237) would allow the sword to cut in either direction
and give the judge immunity by holding his own court office accountable for honest service fraud, obstruction of
justice, false statements, malicious prosecution and fraud placed upon the court. Any willful intent to uncover the
EYES OF JUSTICE or TILT THE SCALES is a willful intent to deny Due Process, which violates Title 18 USC
§1346, “Scheme or Artifice to Defraud,” by perpetrating a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right
of honest services. This is considered fraud and an overthrow of a constitutional form of government and the person
depriving the honest service can be held accountable and face punishment under Title 18 USC and Title 42 USC and
violates Title 28 USC judicial procedures.
Constitution for the United States of America, Article I, Section. 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters
of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill
of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. (Emphasis added by me.) Though
if the title Esquire is not a form of a “Title of Nobility” I am at a loss as to what would be.
8
Both Title 18 USC, Crime and Criminal Procedure, and Title 42 USC, Public Health and Welfare, allow the claimant
to bring an action against the United States and/or the State agencies, departments, and employees for civil rights
violations while dealing in commerce. Title 10 places all public officials under this Title 10 section 333 while under a
state of emergency. (Declare or undeclared War this fall under TWEA.)
2. Theft of Property:
18 U.S. Code § 3924 - Theft of property lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake……A person who comes into control of
property of another that he knows to have been lost, mislaid, or delivered under a mistake as to the nature or amount of the
property or the identity of the recipient is guilty of theft if, with intent to deprive the owner thereof, he fails to take
reasonable measures to restore the property to a person entitled to have it.
American Jurisprudence 2nd 1964 vol. 16 § 362: Nature of Right guaranteed. The right of property is a fundamental,
natural, inherent, and inalienable right… In fact, it does not owe its origin to the constitutions which protect it, for it
existed before them. It is sometimes characterized judicially as a sacred right, the protection of which is one of the most
important objects of government. Pg. 691
3. Forcing me into contracts against my will:
American Jurisprudence 2nd 1964 vol. 16 § 373: Rights of Contract Liberty of contract involves, as one of its essential
attributes, the right to terminate contracts, Valid contracts are property and as such are protected from being taken without
just compensation. The United States Supreme Court has stated that freedom to contract is the essence of freedom from
undue restraint on the right to contract. Other courts have stated that the liberty to make contracts includes the
corresponding right to refuse to accept a contract or to assume such liability as may be proposed. The right of liberty of
contract is inherent and inalienable. It belongs to everyone by the law of the land; every man has the right freely to deal,
or to refuse to deal, with his fellow men. Pg. 706 – 707
U.S. Code Title 42 Penalties for Government Officers. The authority for fines (damages) caused by crimes by
government officers. Dealing with claims of "immunity." Any claim of " immunity" is a fraud because, if valid, it would
prevent removal from office for crimes against the people, which removal is authorized and or mandated under U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section IV; as well as 18 U.S. CODE 241, 42 U.S. CODE 1983, 1985, 1986, and other state
Constitutions. Precedents of Law established by COURT cases, which are in violation of law, render violations of law
legally unassailable. Such a situation violates several specifically stated intents and purposes of the Constitution set forth
in the Preamble; to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and secure the-blessings of liberty. When federal officials
perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity.” Williamson v.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 815 F.2d. 369, ACLU Foundation v. Barr, 952 F.2d. 457, 293 U.S. App. DC 101, (CA
DC 1991).
18 U.S. Code § 2333 - a) ACTION AND JURISDICTION. - Any national of the United States injured in his or her person,
property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue
therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains
and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees…(e) USE OF BLOCKED ASSETS TO SATISFY JUDGMENTS OF U.S.
NATIONALS. - For purposes of section 201 of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (28 U.S.C. 1610 note), in any
action in which a national of the United States has obtained a judgment against a terrorist party pursuant to this section,
the term “blocked asset” shall include any asset of that terrorist party (including the blocked assets of any agency or
instrumentality of that party) seized or frozen by the United States under section 805(b) of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin
Designation Act (21 U.S.C. 1904(b)). ………………………
42 U.S. Code Title 42, § 1986 - Action for neglect to prevent: Every person who having knowledge that any wrongs
conspired to be done and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to
do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured.
4. Conspiracy to deprive rights under color of law:
9
18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of
any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so
exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to
prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured — They shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or
if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or
both, or may be sentenced to death.
Color of Law: The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue
of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under "color of
law: Atkins v Lannins, D. C. Okl, 415 F Supp, 186,188 .... pretense of Law and includes actions of officers who undertake
to perform their official duties...Acts done under color of any law of a State include not only acts done by State officials
within the bounds of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority;
provided that ,unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his
official duties,...abuse or misuse of power which is possessed by the official only because he is an official exercising his
official powers outside the bounds of lawful authority. (422 USCA 1983). (Blacks Law, 5th Ed, Pg 241)
5. Deprivation of right under color of law:
18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of Rights under color of law: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance,
regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States,
or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or
race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one
year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the
use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual
abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may
be sentenced to death.
6. Human trafficking:
18 U.S. Code § 1581 - Peonage; obstructing enforcement: (a) Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of
peonage, or arrests any person with the intent of placing him in or returning him to a condition of peonage, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If death results from the violation of this section, or if the
violation includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or the attempt to commit aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, the defendant shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or life,
or both. (b) Whoever obstructs, or attempts to obstruct, or in any way interferes with or prevents the enforcement of this
section, shall be liable to the penalties prescribed in subsection (a)……….
18 U.S. Code § 1593A - Benefitting financially from peonage2, slavery, and trafficking in persons: Whoever
knowingly benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture which has engaged in
any act in violation of this chapter, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that the venture has engaged in such
violation, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned in the same manner as a completed violation of such section.
7. Using something other than gold or silver coins for payment of debt:
Constitution for the United States of America, Article I, Section. 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or
Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and
2
“Peonage” - Definition & Citations: The state or condition of a peou as above defined; a condition of enforced servitude, by which
the servitor is restrained of his liberty and compelled to labor in liquidation of some debt or obligation, real or pretended, against his will.
Peonage Cases (D. C.) 123 Fed. 071; In re Lewis (C. C.) 114 Fed. 903 ; U. S. v. McClel- lan (D. C.) 127 Fed. 971; Rev. St. U. S. ~ Blacks Law
Dictionary, 2nd Edition
10
silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the
Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. (Emphasis added by me.) Though if the title Esquire is not a
form of a “Title of Nobility” I am at a loss as to what would be.
Coson v. Roehl :: 1963 :: Washington Supreme Court Decisions- "... In this jurisdiction protection is given to one who is
injured by falsehood or deception; fraud vitiates everything which it touches, and destroys the very thing which it was
devised to support; the law does not temporize with trickery or duplicity. A contract, the making of which was induced by
deceitful methods or crafty device, is nothing more than a scrap of paper, and it makes no difference whether the fraud
goes to the factum, or whether it is preliminary to the execution of the agreement itself...."
8. Racketeering and extortion:
Public official's retaliation against an individual exercising his or her rights protected by the First Amendmen t is a
violation of § 1983 of the Federal Civil Rights Act", and that any retaliation from a public official is in violation of
Section 1983. Duran v. City of Douglas, 904 F.2d 1372, 1378 (9th Cir. 1990)…………….
Title 9-110.000 Organized Crime and Racketeering

9-110.800 Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Activity (18 U.S.C. § 1959) Section 1959 makes it a crime to commit
any of a list of violent crimes in return for pecuniary compensation from an enterprise engaged in racketeering activity, or
for the purpose of joining, remaining with, or advancing in such an enterprise. The listed violent crimes are murder,
kidnapping, maiming, assault with a dangerous weapon, assault resulting in serious bodily injury, and threatening to
commit a “crime of violence”, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 16. The listed crimes may be violations of State or Federal law.
In addition, attempts and conspiracies to commit the listed crimes are covered. The maximum penalty varies with the
particular violent crime involved, ranging from a fin and/or three years imprisonment up to a fine and/or life
imprisonment, except for any murder occurring on or after September 13, 1994, which are subject to the death penalty.
9. Denial of right to travel freely in private:
Title 42 USC, Sec. §12202, “State immunity”
A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States from an action in
Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of this chapter. In any action against a State for a
violation of the requirements of this chapter, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for
such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in an action against any public or
private entity other than a State. The "most sacred of liberties" of which Justice Tolman spoke was personal liberty.
The definition of personal liberty is: "Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the
fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions,
which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not
depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to
private property ... and is regarded as inalienable." 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987: “Personal liberty
largely consists of the Right of locomotion -- to go where and when one pleases -- only so far restrained as the Rights
of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the
public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere
privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common Right which he has under his Right to life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions,
travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and
decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but
in his safe conduct." II Am.Jur. (1st) Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135: “Personal liberty -- consists of the
power of locomotion, of changing situations, of removing one's person to whatever place one's inclination may direct,
without imprisonment or restraint unless by due process of law."Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914 ed., Black's Law
Dictionary, 5th ed.; Black's Commentary 134; Hare, Constitution__Pg. 777 Justice Tolman was concerned about
the State prohibiting the Citizen from the "most sacred of his liberties," the Right of movement, the Right of moving
one's self from place to place without threat of imprisonment, the Right to use the public roads in the ordinary course
of life. When the State allows the formation of a corporation it may control its creation by establishing
guidelines (statutes) for its operation (charters). Corporations who use the roads in the course of business do not use
11
the roads in the ordinary course of life. There is a difference between a corporation and an individual. The
United States Supreme Court has stated: "...We are of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this particular
between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for
examination on the suit of the State. The individual may stand upon his Constitutional Rights as a Citizen. He is
entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the
State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to investigation, so far as it may tend to
incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of
his life, liberty, and property. His Rights are such as the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state,
and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his Rights are
the refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under
warrant of law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights. "Upon the other hand,
the corporation is a creature of the state. It is presumed to be incorporated for the benefit of the public. It receives
certain special privileges and franchises, and holds them subject to the laws of the state and the limitations of its
charter. Its rights to act as a corporation are only preserved to it so long as it obeys the laws of its creation. There is a
reserved right in the legislature to investigate its contracts and find out whether it has exceeded its powers. It would be
a strange anomaly to hold that the State, having chartered a corporation to make use of certain franchises, could not in
exercise of its sovereignty inquire how those franchises had been employed, and whether they had been abused, and
demand the production of corporate books and papers for that purpose." Hale vs. Hinkel, 201 US 43, 74-75
Corporations engaged in mercantile equity fall under the purview of the State's admiralty jurisdiction, and the public at
large must be protected from their activities, as they (the corporations) are engaged in business for profit. "...Based
upon the fundamental ground that the sovereign state has the plenary control of the streets and highways in the
exercise of its police power (see police power, infra.), may absolutely prohibit the use of the streets as a place for the
prosecution of a private business for gain. They all recognize the fundamental distinction between the ordinary Right
of the Citizen to use the streets in the usual way and the use of the streets as a place of business or a main
instrumentality of business for private gain. The former is a common Right, the latter is an extraordinary use. As to the
former, the legislative power is confined to regulation, as to the latter, it is plenary and extends even to absolute
prohibition. Since the use of the streets by a common carrier in the prosecution of its business as such is not a right but
a mere license of privilege." Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516. It will be necessary to review early cases and legal
authority in order to reach a lawfully correct theory dealing with this Right or "privilege." We will attempt to reach a
sound conclusion as to what is a "Right to use the road" and what is a "privilege to use the road". Once reaching this
determination, we shall then apply those positions to modern case decision. "Where rights secured by the Constitution
are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. "Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US
436, 491: "The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller vs. U.S., 230 F.
486, 489: "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional Rights."
Snerer vs. Cullen, 481 F. 946: streets and highways are established and maintained for the purpose of travel and
transportation by the public. Such travel may be for business or pleasure. "The use of the highways for the purpose of
travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the
individual cannot be rightfully deprived. "Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28
NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163: “The Right of the Citizen to travel
upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not
a mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579: So we can see that a Citizen has a Right to
travel upon the public highways by automobile and the Citizen cannot be rightfully deprived of his Liberty. So where
does the misconception that the use of the public road is always and only a privilege come from? "... For while a
Citizen has the Right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that Right does not
extend to the use of the highways, either in whole or in part, as a place for private gain. For the latter purpose, no
person has a vested right to use the highways of the state, but is a privilege or a license which the legislature may grant
or withhold at its discretion." State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs.
Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516. There should be considerable authority on a subject as
important a this deprivation of the liberty of the individual "using the roads in the ordinary course of life
and business." However, it should be noted that extensive research has not turned up one case or authority
acknowledging the state's power to convert the individual's right to travel upon the public roads into a "privilege.
"Therefore, it is concluded that the Citizen does have a "Right" to travel and transport his property upon the
public highways and roads and the exercise of this Right is not a "privilege."
12
Travel Definitions:
In order to understand the correct application of the statute in question, we must first define the terms used in connection
with this point of law. As will be shown, many terms used today do not, in their legal context, mean what we assume they
mean, thus resulting in the misapplication of statutes in the instant case.
Difference between automobile and vehicle:
There is a clear distinction between an automobile and a motor vehicle. An automobile has been defined as:
"The word `automobile' connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways." American
Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200
While the distinction is made clear between the two as the courts have stated:
"A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of
persons for which remuneration is received." International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120
The term `motor vehicle' is different and broader than the word `automobile.'" City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d
647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232
The distinction is made very clear in Title 18 USC 31:
"Motor vehicle" means every description or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for
commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, or passengers and property.
"Used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other
considerations, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
Clearly, an automobile is private property in use for private purposes, while a motor vehicle is a machine which may be
used upon the highways for trade, commerce, or hire.
Definition of travel:
The term "travel" is a significant term and is defined as:
"The term `travel' and `traveler' are usually construed in their broad and general sense ... so as to include all those who
rightfully use the highways viatically (when being reimbursed for expenses) and who have occasion to pass over them for
the purpose of business, convenience, or pleasure." 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways, Sect.427, Pg. 717
"Traveler -- One who passes from place to place, whether for pleasure, instruction, business, or health." Locket vs.
State, 47 Ala. 45; Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914 ed., Pg. 3309
"Travel -- To journey or to pass through or over; as a country district, road, etc. To go from one place to another,
whether on foot, or horseback, or in any conveyance as a train, an automobile, carriage, ship, or aircraft; Make
a journey." Century Dictionary, Pg. 2034
Therefore, the term "travel" or "traveler" refers to one who uses a conveyance to go from one place to another, and
included all those who use the highways as a matter of Right.
Notice that in all these definitions, the phrase "for hire" never occurs. This term "travel" or "traveler" implies,
by definition, one who uses the road as a means to move from one place to another.
13
Therefore, one who uses the road in the ordinary course of life and business for the purpose of travel and transportation is
a traveler.
Definition of driver:
The term "driver" in contradistinction to "traveler," is defined as:
"Driver -- One employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle ..." Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914
ed., Pg. 940
Notice that this definition includes one who is "employed" in conducting a vehicle. It should be self-evident that this
individual could not be "travelling" on a journey, but is using the road as a place.
10. Treason against me, one of “the People”
Whereas, it is my understanding that Capital Felony Treason is committed by any actor of a foreign state, acting as a
public servant, pretending to be government, who denies or deprives one of we the people of any right given by God listed
or written in any International Treaty or any Constitution of the United States of America or of any one of the States of the
Republic.
11. Failure to Protect
Pursuant to USC Title 42, § 1986: Action for neglect to prevent – Every person who having knowledge that any
wrongs conspired to be done and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or
refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured. Pursuant to the Universal
Declaration Human Rights 16(3), The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and entitled to
protection by society and the State.
International Commercial Maxims:
 “Things do not change their ownership when captured by pirates and robbers”, “Gross negligence is equivalent to
fraud”.
 All men and women know that the foundation of law and commerce exists in the telling of the truth, and nothing but
the truth.
 Truth, as a valid statement of reality, is sovereign in commerce.
 An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
 An unrebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgment in commerce.
 Guaranteed- All men shall have a remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy does not exist, or if the remedy has
been subverted, then one may create a remedy for themselves - and endow it with credibility by expressing it in their
affidavit.
 An official who impairs, debauches, voids or abridges an obligation of contract, or the effect of a commercial lien
without proper cause, becomes a lien debtor – and his/her property becomes forfeited as the pledge to secure the lien.
Pound breach (breach of im-poundment) and rescue is a felony.
 It is against the law for a Judge to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminis a Commercial Lien. Only the Lien
Claimant or a Jury can dissolve a Commercial Lien.
 What is otherwise good and just, if sought by force or fraud, becomes bad and unjust.
 When the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved.
Timeless and Universal Maxims of Law which include, but are not limited to:
 “An act done by me against my will is not my act.” Brac. 101b

14
 “No man can serve two masters.” (Matthew 6:24)
 “Consent makes the law. (A contract is law between the parties agreeing to be bound by it.)” Branch, Princ., 8
Mont.32
 “One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory cannot be obeyed with impunity.” 10 Co. 77; c Dig. 2.1.20;
Story, Confl. Laws 539; Broom, Max 100, 101.
 “Good faith must be observed.” 1 Metc. Mass. 551; 23 id.; 521
 “And you will know the truth and that very truth will make you free.” (John 8:31-32)
 “In favor of life, liberty and innocence, all things are to be presumed.” Lofft. 125.
 “The contract makes law.” 22 Wend. 215, 233.
 “Freedom does not admit of valuation.” Bracton 14.
 “The form of agreement and the convention of the parties overrule the law.” 1 Pick. 471; Broom, Max, 689 et seq/;2
co 73;22 N.Y. 252
 “To lie is to go against the mind.” 3 Bulstr. 260.
 “He who stands on his own rights injures no one.” 41 La. Ann. 194; 48 id. 1389
 “No man can forfeit another’s right.” Fleta 1.1, c,28 11.
 "Whatever is against the rule of right is wrong." 3 Bulstr. 313
 "What is mine cannot be taken away without my consent." Jenk. Cent.251.
 “'Rights never die."
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Part 1, Article 1 - (1) All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their
political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. (2) All peoples may, for their own ends,
freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international
economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be
deprived of its own means of subsistence. (3) The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having
responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the
right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United
Nations.
United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Article 1 - All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and
should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Article 2 - Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as
race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or
territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of
sovereignty.
Article 3 - Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 4 - No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Article 9 - No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

15
Article 12 - No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks
upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 17 - (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. (2) No one shall be
arbitrarily deprived of his property.
II. Definitions:
Ad recte docendum oportet primum inquirere nomina quia rerum cognitio a nominibus rerum dependet) - In order
rightly to comprehend a thing, it is necessary first to inquire into the names, for a right knowledge of things depends
on their names.
Beneficiary - One for whose benefit a trust is created. One receiving benefit or advantage, or one who is in receipt of
benefits, profits, or advantage.
Bond - Blacks Law 4th: A creditor whose debt is secured by a bond.” (i am the Creditor) In finance, a bond is an
instrument of indebtedness of the bond issuer to the holders;
Cestui que Trust - He who has a right to a beneficial interest in and out of an estate the legal title to which is vested in
another. 2 Waslib. Real Prop. 163. The person who possesses the equitable right to property and receives the rents,
issues, and profits thereof, the legal estate of which is vested in a trustee. It has been proposed to substitute for this
uncouth term the English word “beneficiary,” and the latter, though still far from universally adopted, has come to be
quite frequently used. It is equal in precision to the antiquated and unwieldy Norman phrase, and far better adapted to the
genius of our language.
Color of Law / Color of Authority - In United States law, the term color of law denotes the "mere semblance of legal
right," the "pretense or appearance of" right; hence, an action done under color of law adjusts (colors) the law to the
circumstance, yet said apparently legal action contravenes the law.[1][2] Under color of authority is a legal phrase used
in North America [3] indicating that a person is claiming or implying the acts they are committing are related to and
legitimized by his or her role as an agent of governmental power. Color of law refers to an appearance of legal power to
act that may operate in violation of law, - Wikipedia
Constructive Fraud - Fraud is typically defined at law as an intentional misrepresentation of material existing fact made
by one person to another with knowledge of its falsity and for the purpose of inducing the other person to act, and upon
which the other person relies with resulting injury or damage. Fraud may also be made by an omission or purposeful
failure to state material facts, which nondisclosure makes other statements misleading. Fraud allows a cause of action
against the perpetrator that will make the victim whole. Constructive fraud occurs: If there is an act, an omission or a
concealment of facts. If the act, omission, or concealment of facts is in violation of some type of obligation, such as a
fiduciary duty, a legal duty, an equitable duty, or any other relationship of trust.
Black's law dictionary defines constructive fraud as "all acts, omissions, and concealments involving breach of equitable
or legal duty, trust or confidence, and resulting in damage to another, 38 Cal Rptr. 148, 157; i.e. no scienter (intent to
defraud) is required. Thus the party who makes
the misrepresentation need not know that it is false.”
Conspiracy - Conspiracy is a consultation or agreement between two or more persons, either falsely to accuse another of
a crime punishable by law; or wrongfully to injure or prejudice a third person, or any body of men, in any manner; or to
commit any offense punishable by law; or to do any act with intent to prevent the course of justice; or to effect a legal
purpose with a corrupt intent, or by improper means. Hawk. P. C. c. 72.
Coupon - Blacks Law 4th: Coupons are written contracts for the payment of a definite sum of money on a given day, and
being drawn and executed in a form and mode for the purpose, that they may be separated from the bonds and other
instruments to which they are usually attached.
Emolument/s - Any advantage, profit, or gain received as a result of one’s employment or holding of office.
16
Fiduciary Duty - A fiduciary duty is a legal duty to act solely in another party's interests.
in propria persona sui juris - Sui juris means “(o)f his own right; possessing full social and civil rights; not under any
legal disability, or the power of another, or guardianship.” Black's Law Dictionary 1434 (6th Ed. 1990). Sui juris means a
person who is in esse and not a minor or otherwise legally incapacitated. Sui juris means, loosely, the capacity to
manage one's own affairs, as opposed to 'alieni juris,' which indicates the person is under the control of another, such as a
legal guardian. ' In propria persona' means in his or her own person. '
Instrument - Andersons Law: A written document; a formal or legal document in writing, such as a contract, deed, will,
BOND, or lease;
Liberty - The word "liberty" includes and comprehends all personal rights and their enjoyment. Rosenblum v
Rosenblum, 181 Misc. 78, 42 N.Y. S.2d 626, 630. It embraces freedom from duress; freedom from governmental
interference in exercise of intellect, in formation of opinions, in the expression of them, and in action or inaction
dictated by judgment, Zavilla v Masse, 112 Colo. 183, 147 P.2d 823, 827; freedom from servitude, imprisonment or
restraint, Committee for Industrial Organization v Hague, D.C. N.J., 25 F. Supp. 127, 131, 141; People v Wood, 151
Misc. 66, 272 N.Y. S.258; freedom in enjoyment and use of all of one's powers, faculties and property, freedom of
conscience, Gobitis v Minersville School Dist., D.C. Pa., 21 F. Supp. 58 1, 584, 587; freedom of contract, State ex re I.
Hamby v Cummings, 166 Tenn. 460, 63 S. W. 2d 515; State v Henry, 37 N. M. 536, 25 P.2d 204; freedom of locomotion
or movement, Committee for Industrial Organization v Hague, D.C. N.J., 25 F. Supp. 127, 131, 141; freedom of
occupation, Koos v Saunders, 349 Ill. 442, 182 N. E. 415, 418; freedom of press, Commonwealth v Nichols, 301 Mass.
584, 18 N. E. 2d 166, 167; Near v State of State ex re I. Olson, 283 U.S. 697, 51 S. Ct. 625, 628, 75 L. Ed. 1357; freedom
of religion, Gabrielli v Knickerbocker, 12 Cal. 2d 85, 82 P.2d 391, 393; Hamilton v City of Montrose, 109 Colo. 228, 124
P.2d 757, 759; Cantwell v State of Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 60 S. Ct. 900, 903, 84 L. Ed. 12 13; freedom of speech,
Ghadiali v Delaware State Medical Soc., D.C. Del., 28 F. Supp. 841, 844; Carpenters and Joiners Union of America,
Local No. 213, v Ritter's Cafe, 315 U.S. 722, 62 S. Ct. 807, 86 L. Ed. 1143. It also embraces right of self-defense against
unlawful violence; right to acquire and enjoy property; right to acquire useful knowledge; right to carry on
business, Mlle. Reif, Inc., v Randau, 166 Misc. 247, 1 N.Y. S.2d 515, 518; right to earn livelihood in any lawful
calling; right to emigrate, and if a citizen, to return, Committee for Industrial Organization v Hague, D.C. N.J., 25 F.
Supp. 127, 141; right to engage in a lawful business, to determine the price of one's labor, and to fix the hours when
one's place of business shall be kept open, State Board of Barber Examiners v Cloud, 220 Ind. 552, 44 N. E. 2d 972,
980; right to enjoy to the fullest extent the privileges and immunities given or assured by law to people living within
the country, McGrew v Industrial Commission, 96 Utah 203, 85 P.2d 608, 611; right to forswear allegiance and
expatriate oneself, Committee for Industrial Organization v Hague, D.C. N.J. , 25 F. Supp. 127, 141; right to freely buy
and sell as others may; right to live and work where one will, People v Wood, 151 Misc. 66, 272 N.Y. S.258; right to
marry and have a family, Committee for Industrial Organization v Hague, D.C. N.J., 25 F. Supp. 127, 141; Rosenblum v
Rosenblum, 181 Misc. 78, 42 N.Y. S.2d 626, 630; right to use property according to owner's will. Black’s Law
Dictionary, Fifth Edition. Yet We the People are forced to attend government operated and controlled schools where
throughout our educational years we are brainwashed into believing that we are required to be licensed for these rights and
freedoms and the corporation government, no longer the Constitutional government, fines and/or imprisons us if we are
not licensed. This is an act of Treason and Conspiracy to Commit Treason against every American in this country.
Libel - A published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
Malfeasance - The wrongful or unjust doing of some act which the doer has no right to perform, or which he has
stipulated by contract not to do. It differs from “mis- feasance” and A misdeed or trespass. The doing what a party ought
to do improperly. 1 Tidd, Pr. 4. The improper performance of some act which a man may lawfully do. 3 Steph. Comm.
Null and Void - Having no force, binding power, or validity. Merriam-Websters Dictionary
Peonage - Peonage, also called debt slavery or debt servitude, is a system where an employer compels a worker to pay
off a debt with work. Legally, peonage was outlawed by Congress in 1867.
Statute - Anderson on the U.C.C., Texts, Cases and Commentaries, §1-103:6 “A statute should be construed in harmony
with the common law unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the common law.” And further, “The Code
cannot be read to preclude a common law action.” Hence, statutes are anti-law and merely corporation policies; and, the
right to travel is a common law-right, wherein “The Code cannot be read to preclude a common law action.”
17
Trust - A legal entity created by a grantor for the benefit of designated beneficiaries under the laws of the state and the
valid trust instrument. The trustee holds a fiduciary responsibility to manage the trust's corpus assets and income
for the economic benefit of all of the beneficiaries. A confidence reposed in one person, who is termed trustee, for the
benefit of another, who is called the cestui que trust, respecting property which is held by the trustee for the benefit of the
cestui que trust. State ex rel. Wirt v. Superior Court for Spokane County, 10 Wash.2d 362, 116 P.2d 752, 755.
Trustor - A person who creates a trust, also called a Settlor.

Trustee - Person who holds title to the res and administers it for the others’ benefit.
Trust ex maleficio - Trust ex maleficio. A species of constructive trust arising out of some fraud, misconduct, or breach
of faith on the part of the person to be charged as trustee, which renders it an equitable necessity that a trust should be
implied. See Rogers v. Richards, 67 Kan. 706, 74 Pac.
Slavery and enslavement - Definition & Citations: The condition of a slave; that civil relation in which one man has
absolute power over the life, fortune, and liberty of another. ~ Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed Enslaved and slavery are
both the state and the condition of being a slave,(1)(2) who is someone forbidden to quit their service for an enslaver, and
who is treated by the enslaver as their property.(3) Slavery typically involves the enslaved person being made to perform
some form of work while also having their location or residence dictated by the enslaver. ~ Wikipedia
Unlawful Conversion - Conversion is the deprivation of another’s right to use or possess personal property. Conversion
is often defined as other interference of a person’s right to property without the owner’s consent and without lawful
justification. Stevenson v. Economy Bank of Ambridge, 413 Pa. 442 (Pa. 1964). A conversion occurs when a person
without authority or permission intentionally takes the personal property of another or deprives another of possession of
personal property. It is a tort which allows the injured party to seek legal relief.
III. Notice of Status, Understanding and Claim
It is a fact that I am an American state national, or state citizen, and I am not making a general appearance and this
document is evidence that I make an appearance of “special appearance”. I understand that Special Appearance has been
abolished under 12(b) federal rules and procedures, but I am a state citizen and not domiciled in the State of the UNITED
STATES, but as a state citizen, and I retain all rights and privileges under article lV Section 2 of the constitution for the
united States of America.
“The same person may be at the same time a citizen of the United States and a citizen of a State, but his rights of
citizenship under one of the governments will be different from those he has under the other.” United States v. Cruikshank
(1876).
I am unconditionally free. On my certificate of Live Birth, it doesn’t say anywhere on it that it is a certificate of a
“person” being born, it is the birth of a living breathing man/woman. Any and all contract upon birth and the issuance of a
birth certificate between me and the State of State, STATE OF STATE, is null and void as it is an unconscionable contract
due to fraud and the inability to meet in the mind, as a corporation or person cannot meet in mind with a baby, as well as
due to a lack of full and honest disclosure between the “State” and my mother and father upon my birth. Meeting of the
minds and full and honest disclosure are the basis for all valid contracts.
All conscionable contracts are subject to rescission under the common law for failure to make the proper disclosures in
order to constitute an acceptance, where there is no meeting of the minds there is no contract as set forth in re Maxwell v.
Fairbanks Capital Corporation, 281 B.R. 101, (2002); Bankr.Lexis 759.
42 U.S.C. § 1301 – Definitions

(a) When used in this chapter,
(1) The term “State”, except where otherwise provided, includes the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and when used in subchapters lV, V, Vll, Xl, XlX, and XXl includes the Virgin Islands and Guam.
I am not within the territory of the District of Columbia. Therefore, I am not subject to the jurisdiction of this court or
tribunal nor any independent contracting agent such as the child support office. I never consented to contract with the
18
court or child support office, and do not currently consent to contract. The judge of this court is acting as an independent
contractor and not a judge and is personally liable.
Hundreds of court cases prove that “federal jurisdiction” is limited to the few federal territory areas above indicated. For
example, in two Supreme Court cases, it was decided: “The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend
into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the
exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.” Caha v. United States, 152 U.S., at 215: “We think a proper
examination of this subject will show that the United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of
soil in and to the territory, of which Alabama or any of the new States were formed.” 44 U.S., at 221: The UNITED
STATES corporation and all agencies/corporations acting on its behalf lacks personal jurisdiction over me because I live
outside the “State” District of Columbia federal jurisdiction as an American state national of State. American state
national, living on the land and soil of State. There are two “States”, one being a federal state within the District of
Columbia and the other being a state of the united States of America unincorporated.
All corporations/agencies branching from the UNITED STATES corporation lacks jurisdiction to issue support order 42
U.S.C § 653(p). The courts and child support agency lacks jurisdiction to issue support obligation under 42 U.S.C Section
666(a)(1)(B). The court and child support agency lacks jurisdiction to issue income withholding orders under 42 U.S.C
Section 666(a)(b)(8). Magistrates are independently contracted with Title lV-D and acting in an independent capacity.
This means all child support orders issued by a state judge is without legal force because the state judge is acting in
independent capacity as a contractor for the child support lV-D contract and forfeits his/her capacity as a state judge. This
is a violation of oath of office to serve the People. All lV-D Contract activities shall be performed in compliance with
Title lV-D of the Social Security Act, CRF Parts 302, 303, and 304, and the rules in Division 5101:12 of the
Administrative Code. 42 U.S.C. Sec 651-669b Social Security Act only applied in federal territory defined under 42
U.S.C. Section 1301(a) which does not include the 50 states.
Child support proceedings coram non-judice before surrogate judges are absolutely void. It is a fact a surrogate judge is a
person and not a judge and thereby the child support proceedings are coram non-judice and thereby void for lacking
personal jurisdiction and violation of due process clause of the 14th Amendment.
One cannot legally be held in contempt for any nonpayment of child support as a surrogate judge does not have the
authority to do hold anyone in contempt. 42 U.S.C. Section 659 is proof that child support enforcement requires consent:
42 U.S.C. Section 659(a) Consent to support enforcement; Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including section
407 of this title and section 5301 of title 38), effective January 1, 1975, moneys (the entitlement to which is based upon
remuneration (Renumeration is money paid for service) for employment) due from, or payable by, the United States of the
District of Columbia (including (Limited to) any agency, subdivision, or instrumentality thereof) to any individual,
including (Limited to) members of the Armed Forces of the United States, shall be subject, in like manner and to the same
extent as if the United States or the District of Columbia were a private person, to withholding in accordance with State
law enacted pursuant to subsections (a)(1) and (b) of section 666 of this title and regulations of the Secretary under such
subsections, and to any other legal process brought, by a State agency administering a program under a State plan
approved under this part or by an individual oblige, to enforce the legal obligation of the individual to provide child
support or alimony.
The definition of private person under 42 U.S.C. Section 659(i)(4) is evidence that proves state sovereignty is an
affirmative defense and consent is required to be subjected to child support enforcement.
Private Person 42 U.S.C. § 659(i)(4) The term “private person” means a person who does not have sovereign or other
special immunity or privilege (The Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article lV, Section 2 of the Constitution states
that “the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.”) which
causes the person not to be subject to legal process.
“Because, the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty, or eminent
domain, within the limits of a State or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted.” 44 U.S., at 223
“Alabama is therefore entitled to the sovereignty and jurisdiction over all the territory within her limits, subject to the
common law.” 44 U.S>, at 228, 229; Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 221, 223, 228, 229
19
The definition of state in the uniform interstate family support act or UIFSA is not the same as the 50 states. It does not
include the 50 states themselves, as is confirmed by the following cites:
“We have in our political system a Government of the United States and a government of the several States. Each one of
these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights,
within its jurisdiction, it must protect. The same person may be at the same time a citizen of the United States and a
Citizen of a State, but his rights of citizenship under one of these governments will be different from those he has under
the other.” Slaughter House Cases United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
“The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. Section
1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct.1973, 41 L.Ed.287"...[H]owever late this objection [to jurisdiction] has
been made, or may be made in any cause, in an inferior or appellate court of the United States, it must be considered and
decided, BEFORE any court can move ONE FURTHER STEP IN THE CAUSE; as any movement is necessarily the
exercise of jurisdiction." RHODE ISLAND MASSACHUSETTS, 37 U.S. 657, 718, 9 L.Ed. 1233 (1838).
"It is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary subscription to
license. All jurisdictional facts supporting claim that supposed jurisdiction exists must appear on the record of the court."
Pipe Line v Marathon. 102 S. Ct. 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22
“if the record does not show upon its face the facts necessary to give jurisdiction, they will be presumed not to have
existed.” Norman v. Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03
"Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time," and "Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided."
Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 395 F 2d 906, 910
"Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist." Stuck v. Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751.
211 P2d 289
"Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted." Lantana v. Hopper,102 F. 2d
188; Chicago v. New York 37 FSupp. 150
"There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction." Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215
"Where jurisdiction is contested, the burden of establishing it rests upon the plaintiff." Loos v American Energy Savers,
Inc., 168 Ill.App.3d 558, 522 N.E.2d 841 (1988)
"the burden of proving jurisdiction rests upon the party asserting it." Bindell v City of Harvey, 212 Ill.App.3d 1042, 571
N.E.2d 1017(1st Dist. 1991)
"Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted." Lantana v. Hopper,102 F. 2d
188; Chicago v. New York 37 F Supp. 150
“The government of the United States . . . is one of limited powers. It can exercise authority over no subjects, except those
which have been delegated to it. Congress cannot, by legislation, enlarge the federal jurisdiction, nor can it be enlarged
under the treaty-making power” Mayor of New Orleans v. United States, 10 Pet. 662, 736
"A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction, for a basic issue in any case before a tribunal is its power to
act, and a court must have the authority to decide that question the first instance.“ Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los
Angeles, 171 P2d 8: 331 US 549, 91 K, ed, 1666m 67 S, Ct, 1409
"The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction." Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F 2d 416
“if the record does not show upon its face the facts necessary to give jurisdiction, they will be presumed not to have
existed.” Norman v. Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03
Common law states there must be a victim or injured party. Any court or tribunal cannot be the injured party.
The “State” cannot be the injured party. No agency can be the injured party. No “person” can be the injured
party. No corporation can be the injured party. The victim/injured party must be a living breathing man or
woman. All courts are required to bring forth an injured man or woman and show with evidence that he/she has
caused injury or harm, which is defined as:
20
“To satisfy Article lll’s standing requirements, a plaintiff must show (1) it has suffered an ‘injury in fact’ that is (a)
concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) the injury is fairly
traceable to the challenged action of the defendant; and (3) it is likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the
injury will be redressed by a favorable….”Jujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555 (1992)
ArtIII.S2.C1.6.4.2 Concrete Injury
“First, to have an injury-in-fact, a litigant must establish that he has suffered or is imminently threatened with a
“concrete” injury-that is, an injury that is “real” and not “abstract”. Particularized means it affects the injured
party individually.
“Over the years, our cases have established that the irreducible constitutional minimum of standing contains three
elements. First, the plaintiff must have suffered an “injury in fact”, an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a)
concrete and particularized, see id., at 756; Warth v. Seldin, 422 U. S. 490, 508 (1975); Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S.
727, 740-741, n. 16 (1972); [1] and (b) “actual or imminent, not ‘conjectural’, or ‘hypothetical’,” Whitmore, supra, at 155
(quoting Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 102 (1983). Second, there must be a causal connection between injury and
the conduct complained of-the injury has to be “fairly…trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not…
th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party not before the court,” Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights
Organization, 426 U.S. 26, 41-42 (1976). Third, it must be “likely” as opposed to merely “speculative”, that the injury
will be “redressed by a favorable decision”.
“The Court has also held that a litigant may have standing when it alleges injury from the federal government’s disregard
of the basic structure of government established in the Constitution.” Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 755 (1984)
I am one of the People of the several states.
The Supreme Court adjudicated the People of the several states are unconditionally sovereign.
“We the Sovereign People are not under the management or control of government agencies, to the contrary,
“governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
Declaration of Independence:
“It will be admitted on all hands that with the exception of the powers granted to the states and the federal government
through the Constitutions, the people of the several states are unconditionally sovereign, within their respective states.”
Ohio Life Ins. & Trust Co. v. Debolt, 57 US 416 (1854)
“A state does not owe its origin to the Government of the United States, in the highest or in any of its branches. It was in
existence before it. It derives its authority from the same pure and sacred source as itself: The voluntary and deliberate
choice of the people... A state is altogether exempt from the jurisdiction of the Courts of the United States, or from any
other exterior authority, unless in the special instances where the general Government has power derived from the
Constitution itself... p. 448 “The question to be determined is, whether this State, so respectable, and whose claim soars so
high, is amenable to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States? This question, important in itself, will
depend on others, more important still; and may perhaps, be ultimately resolved into one, no less radical than this- “do the
people of the United States form a NATION? “By that law the several States and Governments spread over our globe, are
considered as forming a society, not a NATION.” [caps in the original.] Chisholm. Ex’r v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 419, 1 L.Ed.
440 (1794)
I declare my political status to be an American state national born within the physical borders of: Your-State. As a living
breathing man/woman with blood flowing through my body, I have returned to my lawful birthright political status as an
state national of State, and I claim my exemptions as stated in Federal Code 8 U.S.C. 1101 (a) 21: “The term "national"
means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.”
American state nationals are not bound by statutes, codes, and ordinances in the absence of a true crime.
The Bill of Rights were ratified on December 15, 1791 and the true laws of the land cite the 1791 USA Constitution and
Bill of Rights. In 1871 the UNITED STATES became a corporation and enacted a new constitution and therefore I do not
21
stand under the corporate constitution. This corporate constitution only applies to persons. The 14 th Amendment which
was never ratified made slaves/subjects of all persons.
I abide by the State Constitution and my God given rights alone. I am not subject to the United States Constitution, which
is not the same as the Constitution of the united States of America unicorporated, as this and the State Constitution
overrules it. Everything other than common law is contract law, therefore by declaring that I am a living breathing
man/woman I rebut that I am not a person and the living man/woman, me, is physical evidence to prove I am not a person.
“If the state converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.” Shuttlesworth v.
Birmingham, 373 USs 262
“Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be
maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument” Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan.
Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)
"The people or sovereign are not bound by general word in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless
expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the
King, the former sovereign,....." People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)
“All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s laws.
All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…” [Rodrigues v. Ray Donavan (U.S.
Department of Labor) 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985).1]
“The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the code, rules, regulations, policy, and statutes are “not
the law”, [Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261] “A ‘Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La.
1067, 3 Sold 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law, A concurrent or
‘joint resolution of legislature is not “Law,” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Old.
368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd. v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).
"A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and
practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the Right depends."
Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349, 353, 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907)
"The State cannot diminish rights of the people." Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516
"The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent contract." see, Dred Scott vs.
Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is independent of all laws,
except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.”
CRUDEN vs. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70
“When acting to enforce a statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date, the judge of the municipal court is
acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity; courts administrating or enforcing statutes do not act
judicially, but merely ministerially….but merely act as an extension as an agent for the involved agency -- but only in a
“ministerial” and not a “discretionary capacity...” Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 583; Keller v. P.E., 261 US 428;
F.R.C. v. G.E., 281, U.S. 464
“The Fourteenth Amendment is an extension of national military powers presently used in a municipal character and
enforced by municipal laws, stretched far beyond their original limitations and enforced in Article I Tribunals.” Dyett v
Turner 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403 [1968] The Non-Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment by Judge A.H. Ellett,
Utah Supreme Court
“There are no common law offenses against the United States. Only those acts which Congress has forbidden, with
penalties for disobedience of its command, are crimes.” United States v. Hudson & Goodwin, 11 U.S. (7th Cr.) 32 (1812);
United States v. Coolidge, 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 415 (1816); United States v. Britton, 108 U.S. 199, 206 (1883); United
States v. Eaton, 144 U.S. 677, 687 (1892).
“It is noted as significant that the act constituting the court dispenses with trial by jury, a provision which was distinctly
upheld in spite of the Seventh Amendment in McElrath v. United States, 102 U. S. 426. With respect to the status of the
court, the opinion concludes (pp. 279 U. S. 454-455): "While what has been said of the creation and special function of
22
the court definitely reflects its status as a legislative court, there is propriety in mentioning the fact that Congress always
has treated it as having that status. From the outset, Congress has required it to give merely advisory decisions…. Under
the act creating it, all of its decisions were to be of that nature…. This is true at the present time. A duty to give decisions
which are advisory only, and so without force as judicial judgments, may be laid on a legislative court, but not on a
constitutional court established under Art. III."” Williams v United States 289 U.S. 553 (1933)
The Supreme Court refers to American state nationals as “state citizens”.
"State citizens are the only ones living under free government, whose rights are incapable of impairment by legislation or
judicial decision." Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 97, 1908
"State Citizenship is a vested substantial property right, and the State has no power to divest or impair these rights." Favot
v. Kingsbury, (1929) 98 Cal. App. 284, 276 P. 1083
“a (private) citizen does not waive a right, unless HE DOES SO KNOWLINGLY AND WITH FULL APPRECIATION
OF ALL CIRCUMSTANCES THEREOF”. (Brady v. U.S, 397 U.S. 742.748)
"It will be admitted on all hands that with the exception of the powers granted to the states and the federal government,
through the Constitutions, the people of the several states are unconditionally sovereign within their respective states."
Ohio L. Ins. & T. Co. v. Debolt, 16 How. 416, 14 L.Ed. 997
"A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and
practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the Right depends."
Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349, 353, 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907)
“Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be
maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument” Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan.
Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)
"Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; … while sovereign powers are
delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all
government exists and acts." Yick Wo v Hopkins, 118 US 356, at pg 370
"The governments are but trustees acting under derived authority and have no power to delegate what is not delegated to
them. But the people, as the original fountain might take away what they have delegated and entrust to whom they
please. ... The sovereignty in every state resides in the people of the state and they may alter and change their form of
government at their own pleasure." Luther v. Borden, 48 US 1, 12 Led 581.
"and because it brings into action, and enforces this great and glorious principle, that the People are the sovereign of this
country, and consequently that fellow Citizens and joint sovereigns cannot be degraded by appearing with each other in
their own courts to have their controversies determined. “Chisolm v Georgia 2 Dall. 440 U.S. Code § 1301 – Definitions
(3) The term “person” means an individual, a trust or estate, a partnership, or a corporation. The definition of a person as
defined by 28 U.S.C Section 3002 (10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual), a corporation, a
partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, or an estate, or any other public or private entity, including a State of
local government or an Indian tribe. 28 U.S.C Section 3002 (15) states “United States” means (A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United
States. According to this, this court is defined as a corporate person. I am not a natural person defined under 42 U.S.C.
Section 1301(A)(3). 42
I do not live within the “State” as defined under 42 Section 1301(a)(1) as being the District of Columbia, the
commonwealth or Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands and Guam and thereby the court lacks personal jurisdiction. I do not live
within federal jurisdiction define under 42 U.S.C. Section 1301(a)(1). Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1301(a)(1) “State” is
defined as being the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands and Guam. I live outside the
“State” and all statutes, to include child support statutes 42 U.S.C. Sec 651-669b do not apply because I am out of federal
jurisdiction.
There is a difference between “state” and “State”, with both have different jurisdictions.
23
State and state have two separate legal meanings:
“A small “s” state consists of land, people, and government. A capital “S” State occupies the land, people, and
government.” Texas v. White, 74 US 227 (1869)
“A state, in the ordinary sense of the Constitution, is a political community of free citizens, occupying a territory of
defined boundaries, and organized under a government sanctioned and limited by a written constitution, and established
by the consent of the governed. It is the union of such states, under a common constitution, which forms the governed. It
is the union of such states, under a common constitution, which forms the distinct and greater political unit, which that
Constitution designates as the United States, and makes of the people and states which compose it one people and one
country.” Texas v. White, 74 US 227 (1869) 42 U.S.C. § 1301
Definitions when used in this chapter:
The term State, except where otherwise provided, includes the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, and when used in subchapters lV, V, Vll, Xl, XlX, and XXl includes the Virgin Islands and Guam.
I live in a “state” that we the People created. I do not live in a “State”. I am subject to all the laws we the People
created for the “state”. I am not subject to the “State” laws, such as statutes.
I am not a private person.

Private person 42 USC § 659(i)(4) The term “private person” means a person who does not have sovereign or other
special immunity or privilege which causes the person not to be subject to legal process.
I am not a citizen or national of the United States. I AM NOT A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN.
A citizen of the United States according to Federal Code 8 U.S.C. 1101 (a) 22: “The term "national of the United States"
means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent
allegiance to the United States.” I am neither a national of the United States nor a citizen of the United States, nor do I
owe permanent allegiance to the United States.
I am protected under my privately registered indemnity bond. I have a privately registered indemnity bond with the
Treasury Department. All variations of my vessels have been placed under the protection of this indemnity bond. No state
government, court, or agency can claim jurisdiction over my tradename, or use it in any penal security instrument. I have
claimed my minor estate. I am not an infant or a ward of any court.
“Clients are also called “wards of the court”…” 7 Corpus Juris Secundum § 4 Attorneys
“Wards of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind. Davis' Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d 189, 190.
Their rights must be guarded jealously. Montgomery v. Erie R. Co., C.C.A.N.J., 97 F.2d 289, 292.” Blacks Law
Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 1755
“Wards of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind. Davis' Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d 189, 190.
Their rights must be guarded jealously. Montgomery v. Erie R. Co., C.C.A.N.J., 97 F.2d 289, 292.” Blacks Law
Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 1755
"An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness". Trinsey v.
Pagliaro D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647
"Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in the disposition of [a] case." U. S. v. Lovasco
(06/09/77) 431 U.S. 783, 97 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752
"Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not sufficient for motion to dismiss or for summary judgment," Trinsey
v.. Pagliaro, D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647
"No instruction was asked, but, as we have said, the judge told the jury that they were to regard only the evidence
admitted by him, not statements of counsel", Holt v. United States, (10/31/10) 218 U.S. 245, 54 L. Ed. 1021, 31 S. Ct. 2
Trinsey v Pagliaro D.C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647. "Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not facts before the
court and are therefore insufficient for a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment."
24
A judge is simply a clerk operating in a private capacity without immunity to law suit. All government employees
(Judges, police officers etc) can be in their private capacity, or public capacity. If judges are enforcing statutes they are
operating in their private capacity as a clerk, and have no immunity.
“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const. Co. v.
Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94
"Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts in attempting to
exercise such powers are necessarily nullities" Burns v. Sup., Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1
"...judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (civil or criminal in nature and otherwise), act as mere
"clerks" of the involved agency..." K.C. Davis, ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West's 1965 Ed.)
"Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts in attempting to
exercise such powers are necessarily nullities" Burns v. Sup., Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1
“When acting to enforce a statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date, the judge of the municipal court is
acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity; courts administrating or enforcing statutes do not act
judicially, but merely ministerially….but merely act as an extension as an agent for the involved agency -- but only in a
“ministerial” and not a “discretionary capacity...” Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 583; Keller v. P.E., 261 US 428;
F.R.C. v. G.E., 281, U.S. 464
"It is the accepted rule, not only in state courts, but, of the federal courts as well, that when a judge is enforcing
administrative law they are described as mere 'extensions of the administrative agency for superior reviewing purposes' as
a ministerial clerk for an agency..." 30 Cal 596; 167 Cal 762
EVERYONE WORKING IN COURT IS A CONTRACTOR UNDER 42 USC SECTION 654(7) COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENTS 45 CFR 303.107 AND 45 CFR 302.34
I exclusively own and operate FIRST MIDDLE LAST© ™.
In 1862 the definition of person was changed to mean a corporation. This is the reason for all capital spelling of names. I
am not this legal fiction, I act on behalf of this legal fiction. I am operating from a private capacity in international trade,
which is highly protected, and I do not operate in a public capacity. I am doing business as FIRST MIDDLE LAST© ™,
which is my trade name (vessel in trade) permanently domiciled on the land and soil of Your-State, the state I was born in.
Refer to the three Acts of Expatriation I have provided in the attachments to show that I am not a person, or a corporation.
My certificate of assumed name establishes the permanent domicile of my tradename on the land and soil of Your-State,
and also claims the Name in Maritime and Admiralty jurisdictions. In those jurisdictions the Name (Admiralty) and the
NAME (Maritime) represent corporate and incorporated entities. No person or corporation has my consent to use my
tradename in any territorial jurisdiction. I have copyrighted and trademarked FIRST MIDDLE LAST ©™ and hold all
rights to the use of my name and any and all variations of it in correlation with the Cestui Que Trust.
“A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and cobeneficiary of the PCT (Public
Charitable Trust), the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the
USA and US Inc.” Congressional Record, June 13 1967, pp. 15641-15646.
I am not the co-trustee or co-beneficiary. I am the Grantee and Sole Beneficiary, and I do not give any agency permission
to operate the FIRST MIDDLE LAST Cuesti Que Trust without my knowledge or consent.
1. I, a living soul, so called by my father and mother since born, Alesha Lynn of the Henson family, and I was born
the 1st day of March, 1989, in the free State State.
2. I am a man/woman, and one of the people of these United States for America, being a creation of God and
domiciled in one of the several States.
3. I am, a living, breathing, sentient being on the land, a Free Principal, a natural creation of God and therefore am
not and cannot be any ARTIFICIAL PERSON or LEGAL PERSON and, therefore, am exempt from any corporate
25
process, law, code, or statute, mandate, or any color thereof.
4. In these United States for America, the authority of any and all governments resides in the people of the land, for
government is a fiction of the mind and can only be created by the people, affected by the people, overseen by the people,
for the benefit of the people, and to secure the individual God-given rights of the people; and;
5. I reserve, claim all, and waive none of my God-given, secured and guaranteed rights, pursuant to the original
Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, the Constitution for the United States of America, and International
Treaty(ies), including but not limited to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, and;
6. Pursuant to the Constitution for the United States of America with the Articles of the Amendments, Article VI
paragraph 2, “This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all
Treaties made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every
State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding”.
7. As a matter of their lawful compliance to the referenced constitution, any of the people, while functioning in any
public capacity, in return for the trust of the people, are granted limited delegated authority by the people with specific
duties delineated in accordance thereof, shall only do so pursuant to a lawfully designated, sworn and subscribed Oath of
Office and any and all bonds required thereof.
8. The only court authorized by the referenced constitution to hear matters of the people is a court that conforms to
and functions in accordance with Article III Section 2 of the referenced constitution in which all officers of the court abide
by their sworn and subscribed oaths of office and support and defend the rights of the people, and are heard only in “trial
by jury”, in accordance with all aspects of due process of law.
9. Pursuant to the Supreme Law of the Land and the God-given rights secured and guaranteed therein, this
constitution is established to ensure the dominion granted by God to all people on this land, shall endure, and ensure
forever that the people on this land be free from any and all slavery, indenturement, tyranny, and oppression under the
color of any law, statute, code, policy, procedure, rule, regulation or of any other type.
10. Pursuant to this constitution, I cannot be compelled, manipulated, extorted, tricked, threatened, placed under
duress, or coerced or so affected under the color of law and/or color of authority by any Natural Person, who individually,
or in any capacity as, or under, any artificial person, agency, entity, officer or party, into waiving of any of my God-given
rights or to act in contradiction thereof, or to act in opposite of the moral conscience and dominion granted to me by God,
nor can I be deprived of any of these rights, privileges, and immunities except by lawful process in accordance with the
Law, without that natural and/or artificial person, in whatever capacity.
11. I am not a citizen, resident, subject, taxpayer et al of the municipal corporations and private corporations doing
business as United States, State of State, County of County et al nor of any other municipal corporation; nor does my
physical location or the physical location of my private property, create duties and obligations upon me to the foregoing
municipal corporations, which are fictions of law that cannot make claims against a wo/man and her/his private property.
12. I am the sole responsible party and holder in due course for any private property where I provided my sweat labor
and equity in the maintenance thereof, in particular, the land and buildings known as your property address hereinafter
known as home-property and I (we) am (are) entitled to possess it, and enjoy all rights of property.
26
13. The municipal corporations or private corporations doing business as the State of State, County of County et al or
of any other municipal corporation, nor any man-made entity possess no interest in my private property, possess no
authority to make claims against my private property and possess no authority or rights, whatsoever, over myself, or my
private property.
14. I, am a FREE Sovereign Principal, True Beneficiary of and Claimant to the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que
(Vie) Trust (minor account), Social Security Taxpayer Number XXX-XX-1234, and Secured-Party Creditor.
15. I have NEVER knowingly nor voluntarily agreed to be surety for the FIRST MIDDLE LAST Cestui Que
(Vie)Trust.
16. I, FIRST MIDDLE LAST, claim I am a FREE Sovereign Principal, born with certain “un-a-lien-able” natural
rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away. Among these fundamental natural
rights, are the right to “self-determination”, and the right to "life, liberty, and property", therefore, there shall not be
any presumption of my status, as it is my gift from my Creator and my un-a-lien-able right of self-determination, and;
17. I, a man/woman, claim my “un-a-lien-able” God-given rights are my property, and;
18. I, a man/woman, claim my sweat labor and equity is my property and that I have a right to claim my property
through commercial or common law lien, and no man, man/woman, entity, trust business entity, nor trustee has the
authority to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminish my claim(s). Only I have the authority to remove my
claim(s), and;
19. I, a man/woman, claim I am NOT property of another man, woman, or corporation as Freedom is an unalienable,
God-given divine right, and a universal aspect of wo/man's true nature, essential for fullness of life in him/her. Freedom
is the natural environment for the essence of divine creation, “God” to be glorified through wo/man fully alive with the
liberty to express that fullness, and No wo/man or institution is the source of creation of life of another or has any a
priority claim on said life. For anyone, operating on his/her own or through constructed institutions, to presume to have
title or right to dominate the life of anyone who does not contract voluntarily, willingly, and knowingly to become a party
or subject to the claim is criminal usurpation of wo/man's free will which even our Creator does not exercise. The
convictions, beliefs, lifestyles, creeds, and religious practices are entirely the concern of each man and remain inviolate
unless said convictions and practices injure or defraud another against his will.
20. I, a man/woman, claim my body, information and my genetic material are my PROPERTY, and I do not consent
to any man or woman, individual, entity or corporate body politic trespassing upon my property, and;
PROPERTY: “That which belongs exclusively to one”. “The right and interest which a wo/man has in lands and
chattels to the exclusion of others”.
21. I, a man/woman, claim my God-given ”un-a-lien-able” right to PROPERTY and the enjoyment thereof, and my
right to protect and defend my property is God-given and un-a-lien-able, and;
22. I, a man/woman, claim I cannot be arbitrarily deprived of my property without constitutionally compliant due
process of law, and;
23. I, a man/woman claim all of my inherent God-given “un-a-lien-able” rights without prejudice, at all times waiving
none ever, and;
24. I AM NOT ACTING NOR HAVE I EVER KNOWLINGLY NOR WILLINGLY ACTED IN THE ROLE OF AN
ARTIFICIAL PERSON, and;
25. I, FIRST MIDDLE LAST, have full power to contract, establish commerce as found being guaranteed by
International Common Law, and;
27
26. Whereas, it is my understanding that public servants (officials) have a broad fiduciary duty to carry out their
responsibilities in a manner that is faithful to the public trust that reposed in them, and it is also my understanding that
honest public service means being conscientious, loyal, faithful, disinterested and unbiased. Honest public service is
performed free of deceit, undue influence, conflict of interest, self-enrichment, self-dealing, concealment, bribery, fraud
and corruption, and;
27. Whereas it is my understanding that a fiduciary duty is a legal duty to act solely in another party's interests, and a
fiduciary duty is the strictest duty of care recognized by the U.S. legal system, and I accept all public servants/judicial
participants oaths of office and bind them to it, and;
28. Whereas, it is my understanding that Capital Felony Treason is committed by any actor of a foreign state, acting
as a public servant, pretending to be government, who denies or deprives one of we the people of any right given by God
listed or written in any International Treaty or any Constitution of the United States of America or of any one of the States
of the Republic, and;
29. That, the privately owned and operated “Federal Reserve” banking system operating an agency calling itself the
State Department of Health approached my mother under the pretense of recording my birth and registered it instead. The
effect of these “voluntary contracts” were never fully disclosed nor discussed; The very existence of any contract
impacting our estates, nationality, or controlling interests, was concealed from my mother and her ignorance guaranteed
mine as well. I couldn’t object to a contract, if I didn’t know it existed. The State Department of Health perpetrated the
same scheme upon me with the birth of my own daughters and son, and;
30. Thus, a privately owned agency of a privately owned corporation---both deceptively named to mislead us into
thinking we were part of the legitimate government---secured an undisclosed claim against us and our earthly estates. The
Federal Reserve banks then used our collateral as the basis to issue “bonds” --- Birth Certificate Bonds, and claimed that
our earthly estates were chattel standing as “surety” backing the debts of the Federal Reserve and the United States of
America, incorporated, bankrupt governmental services corporations undergoing Chapter 11 reorganization. All this was
done without disclosure, without notice, and without our consent, and;
31. Constructive Fraud3 and Unlawful Conversion4 (Equating to Human Rights Abuses) has been perpetrated upon me
and my family by men and women acting as Public Servants d/b/a Officers, Directors, Administrators, Agents, Employees
aka Politicians, Attorneys, Judges, Clerks, Sheriffs, Deputies, Police, Process Servers, Realtors and Contractors et al of
the United States et al, State of Your-State, and; That by presumptive tacit agreement, I (we) was (were) un-knowingly
misdescribed and unlawfully converted from a Child(ren) of God, Living soul(s), National(s), Inhabitant(s) on the land,
into (a) Citizen(s), (a) Person(s), (a) Resident(s) which by historical définitions of a “city employee(s)”, (a) “dead legal
entity(ies) or vessel(s) or office(s) of person(s)”, and “as someone there temporarily to do business”, thereby changing my
(our) status, standing and jurisdiction, and;
32. I emphatically deny that I have ever with any degree of complete understanding and honest disclosure, abandoned
my daughters to the State of State et al and/or Federal United States Government through the birth registration process,
wherein the states acting under false and fraudulent doctrines of Parens Patriae, and In Loco Parentis, claimed it was the
parent of myself, and my daughters. Claiming the State is the Parent is an odious presumption and arrogantly false and as
far as I am concerned an act of “war crimes and capital felony treason”, and;
33. I emphatically deny I have ever given my power of attorney away to anyone or entity for the purpose of
instituting any administrative commercial action in my name with any degree whatsoever of complete understanding, full
and honest disclosure or without great duress. Nor granting that my labor and or my property of whatever kind, or
wherever situated, be held as collateral in any bankruptcy proceeding of the state or federal governments. Nor any
3
Black's law dictionary defines constructive fraud as "all acts, omissions, and concealments involving breach of equitable or legal duty, trust or
confidence, and resulting in damage to another, 38 Cal Rptr. 148, 157; i.e. no scienter (intent to defraud) is required.
4
Conversion - Definition & Citations: This term applies to taking another person’s property without any cause or permission. It is an unlawful
action.
28
scheme, using my labor and property as collateral, to support or fund a fiat money scheme of the Federal Reserve Bank,
Inc., the State of Your-State, and/or Federal United States Government, et al.
34. My employees (government corporations), public servants enslaved me (us), then stole from the fruits of my (our)
labor, and;
35. These same public servants tried to make me, the man/woman, converted to (a) signatory officer into (a)
“PERSON” or Vessel aka the FIRST MIDDLE LAST aka FIRST MIDDLE LAST Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and
fraudulently held as surety(ies) and debtor(s) when I (we) am (are) are truly the holder(s) in due course and actual
creditor(s), and;
36. I, the living man/woman, am True Beneficiary of the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and am
very much alive as Bearer, Claimant, Beneficiary and Secured-Party Creditor, and it is I who enjoys any financial benefit
to this Cestui que (Vie) Trust Estate.
37. That I, being alive and well, not lost at sea and having claimed the FIRST MIDDLE LAST Ceste Que (Vie) Trust
(minor account), whereby, said Claim aka Affidavit of Truth and Assertory Oath, Repudiation and Revocation of
Citizenship has been properly served.
38. That, I also now understand that my social security number or CUSIP was used, via fraud while under the extreme
duress of child birth, using my mother as an informant to give me up to the STATE OF STATE without full and honest
disclosure was bonded and insured since my birth and those funds have and/or are currently being used by multiple
Corporations including multiple Life insurance policies, and;
39. Demand has been made that those bonds and policies be redeemed for real monies and if any debts are
proved against me, those debts withheld as payment in full that I may be made whole and the balance paid to me in real
money. US Postal Money Orders, Gold or Silver shall suffice.
40. It is my understanding that, these private secret trusts are set up under Canonum De Ius Positivum Canons of
Positive Law. Canon 2057 - Any administrator or executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust,
upon a person establishing their status and competency, is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties
requiring their immediate removal and punishment, and;
41. Additionally, I have found even real property, in particular my (our) home-property, the land and buildings known
as, your property address, has been stolen from me (us) through fraud by trustees, officers, agents, employees, contractors
et al of United States, State of State, County of County et al. This should have been Allodial to me under land patent and
described in metes and bounds. Not in lot block tax no. and;
42. I am entitled to my sweat-labor (life force energy) equity and interest in my home-property, and have publicly
published my claim. I and my family have been deprived of the enjoyment and use of said property, and my (our) equity
and interest has been stolen by men and women acting as our Public Servants d/b/a Officers, Directors, Administrators,
Agents, Employees aka Politicians, Attorneys, Judges, Clerks, Sheriffs, Deputies, Police, Process Servers, Realtors aka
Employees of United States, State of State, County of County et al.
43. The Lien-Debtors are co-conspirers who have stolen my biological property, First Middle Last©™ and First
Middle Last and held them for ransom, in exchange for money and extortion through practices and operations of the State
agencies. The STATE OF STATE, and all agencies acting within the power of the State, receives funding for peonage of
people and creating causes of actions for gain and profit.
44. I am executor of and Claimant to the YOUR-NAME, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust named as Defendant in JUDICIARY
COURTS OF THE STATE OF STATE d/b/a Name d/b/a Name (If there is a second d/b/a according to dunn and brad,
dnb.com;remember to erase this :) - Case No. 123456, Court name - Case No. 123456 (if you have multiple cases,
otherwise delete this second case no.), is NULL & VOID for Constructive Fraud, and;
29
45. I am the Secured Party and Claimant to the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust named as Plaintiff in
JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF STATE d/b/a Name d/b/a Name - Case No. 123456, Court name - Case No.
123456 (if you have multiple cases, otherwise delete this second case no.), is NULL & VOID for Constructive Fraud,
and;
46. All United States and State Agents & Officers of all Instrumentalities and Political Subdivisions, Contractors, etc
under the jurisdiction of the Roman Curia and International Law is/are VOID of PARENS PATRIAE for Constructive
Fraud in ALL MATTERS concerning this Living Soul, First Middle, and my Divinely-Begotten Property (Offspring),
First Middle Last©™ and First Middle Last ©™.
46. In violation of Canonum De Ius Positivum Canons of Positive Law, having failed to immediately dissolve the Cestui
Que (Vie) Trust and return to me what is mine upon my establishing my status and competency, Trustee, (Judge name of
court case(s)) and is in fundamental breach of fiduciary duties.
47. All Statutory Judg(e)ments aka “alleged debts” aka Security(ies) (Bonds) Instruments aka Court/Bank Cusip
Attaching No.(s) aka Cause/Case I.d. Nos. involving this Living Soul, and my Divinely-Begotten Property (Offspring),
Ava Ruth Showl©™ and Marilla Rose Linley©™ are absolutely and unequivocally NULL & VOID including but not
limited to: (1) Sixteenth Judicial Circuit of (Your County) County d/b/a (Your County) County Chancery Court - Case
No. 69DR-21-18,; (2) Sixteenth Judicial Circuit of (Your County) County d/b/a (Your County) County Chancery Court -
Case No. 69DR-21-84.
Attaching No.(s) aka Cause/Case I.d. Nos. involving this Living Soul, and my Divinely-Begotten Property (Offspring),
First Middle Last©™ and First Middle Last ©™ are absolutely and unequivocally NULL & VOID including but not
limited to: (1) County District Court d/b/a County Circuit Court- Case No. 123456, and any case number. associated with
State Uniform Law Enforcement Citation No. Ticket Number (if you have a ticket to address).
Attaching No.(s) aka Cause/Case I.d. Nos. involving this Living Soul and ANY and All courts in the State of State,
STATE OF STATE, are absolutely and unequivocally NULL & VOID.
50. Accordingly any “alleged” property sale, “alleged” transfer and/or “alleged” conveyance of my (our) home-
property based thereon i.e. Warranty Deed with recording number A123456789 filed in COUNTY CO, STATE
ABBREVIATION (Example: AZ) and any other similar claim(s) based thereon, are likewise NULL & VOID.
51. Likewise, any registered complaints filed with any police department or court in the State of Your-State by any
party involved in the creation of and/or “alleged enforcement” of the above referenced Sixteenth Judicial Circuit of (Your
County) County, (Your County) County District Court, and any and all courts in the State of Your-State Case No.’s
involving the YOUR-FIRST MIDDLE LAST, YOUR OFFSPRING-FIRST MIDDLE LAST Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts
and/or me and/or any member of my Family are based on fraud and are slanderous to our good name(s) and the public
record must be corrected to reflect this fact.
52. Likewise, any property belonging to me and/or any member of my Family that was seized by any man or woman,
Trustee, Participating and/or Interested Party “alleging” authority under the above-referenced, Case No.(s) is stolen
property and must be returned, and other provisions set forth therein.
Maxim: “Things do not change their ownership when captured by pirates and robbers”, “Gross negligence is equivalent
to fraud”. and; 18 U.S. Code § 3924: Theft of property lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake……
53. In the Court Name d/b/a Name Court Case: 12345, jurisdiction was successfully challenged.
54. When Attorney’s and Judges proceed without establishing jurisdiction, they are in violation of their own United
States Supreme Court Rulings res judicata. In both cases, Attorneys and Judges proceeded without having established
jurisdiction, rendering said cases VOID and any orders rendered therefrom VOID under their own Supreme Court
Rulings.
30
55. The Supreme Law, the Constitution for the United States of America, was brought forward retaining and
reserving all my (our) God-given rights and through the supremacy clause of the Constitution. Once this Supreme Law is
brought into the light public servants must obey them or face serious consequences. If they refuse or fail to obey them,
they are trespassing and depriving me (us) of life, liberty, property and my (our) right to be left alone. They committed
multiple felony crimes in violation of U.S. Code Title 18 241, 242, 2381-2385, U.S. Code Title 42 and § 1983 of the
Federal Civil Rights Act and Breach of Authority, Slavery and Enticement to Slavery.
56. By proceeding without constitutionally compliant due process of law, the judges and attorneys in the herein
referenced matters, as state officers, engaged in the practice of law and acting as trespassers of the law, restricted my (our)
liberties, thereby making war against the constitution, U.S. Code Title 18 § 241, § 242, § 2381-2385, thereby losing
subject-matter jurisdiction rendering the cases null and void and orders rendered therefrom not voidable, but VOID
and of no legal force or effect. Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974).
57. Judges and attorneys as a state officers while engaged in the practice of law and acting as trespassers of the law,
restricted my (our) liberties and without proper warrant and due process of law issued orders that my (our) property be
seized and taken from me (us) without just compensation thereby depriving me (us) of my (our) rights secured and
protected by the ICCP, Article 1; the Nuremberg Code; the UDHR, Articles 3 and 4 ; the Fourth, Fifth and Ninth
amendments to the Constitution for the United States of America, and in violation of USC Title 18 § 241 and § 242, USC
Title 42 , and § 1983 of the Federal Civil Rights Act.
58. In violation of U.S. Code Title 42 and the United States Supreme Court Ruling res judicata - “Silence can only
be equated with fraud when there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or when an inquiry left unanswered would be
intentionally misleading. . . . We cannot condone this shocking conduct. . . . If this is the case we hope our message is
clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately.” U.S. v. Tweel,
550 F2d 297, 299-300. - my (our) inquiries to Trustees have gone unanswered. By their silence, where they had a legal
and moral duty to speak and failed and/or refused to do so, I (we) have been deceptively deprived of my (our) liberties,
rights and property.
59. By restraining my (our) liberties and compelling I (we) the Beneficiaries to labor in liquidation of some “alleged”
debt or obligation, real or pretended, against my (our) will, Attorneys and Trustee-Officers, Agents, Contractors of Lien-
Debtors benefitted financially from holding us in a state and condition of peou (peonage) “a condition of en-forced
servitude” in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1581 - Peonage; obstructing enforcement, and 18 U.S. Code § 1593A -
Benefitting financially from peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons.
60. Trustees, in violation of their oaths of office to the federal and state constitutions, denied my (our) rights to
constitutional provisions: right to evidence, right to truth in evidence, right to reasonable defense arguments and I (we)
were forced to comply with contracts not held, a form of slavery in violation of international treaty(ies) in particular the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 4, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 1 and
the Nuremberg Code and in violation of USC Title 42 and USC Title 18 § 242 and § 242 and are subject to penalties
under USC Title 18 § 3571.
61. Furthermore, it is my inner and over standing that slavery has been abolished worldwide and that a claim of
authority based on slavery and/or enticement to slavery is absolutely and equivocally something I simply would not
willingly nor knowingly agree to. Therefore, your claim of power and authority over me or any member of my family in
this regard is absolutely and undeniably a trespass against my (our) God-given right to freedom in all its forms, a denial of
my (our) rights protected and secured by the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments to the Constitution for the
united states of America and is at the very minimum a violation of my (our) God-given rights secured and protected under
the Nuremberg Code, the UDHR, Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 & 9; ICCP, Article 1; USC Title 18 § 242 and since there are two
or more of you, USC Title 18 § 241, and more.
62. Be it known, I DO NOT now NOR HAVE I ever knowingly NOR willingly consented to granting Lien-Debtors-
Trustees NOR their Principals-the power and/or authority to deny me (us) my (our) God-given rights to property, due
process and just compensation, as it is a trespass against my (our) rights, an administration of my (our) property without
31
right, a denial of my (our) rights protected and secured by the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments to the
Constitution for the United States of America, a violation of my (our) God-given Rights secured and protected under the
Nuremberg Code; UDHR, Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 & 9; ICCP, Article 1; and a violation of USC Title 18 § 241 and § 242.
63. In the Court Name d/b/a Name Court Case: 12345, the court created and sold Bonds and/or Securities bearing the
assumed names of YOUR-FIRST MIDDLE LAST, YOUR OFFSPRING-FIRST MIDDLE LAST Cestui Que (Vie)
Trusts without my (our) knowledge and consent which is securities fraud, as well as breach of executive and fiduciary
duties as evidenced by trustee’s course of conduct.
64. In that the Court sold securities (bonds) in the name(s) of the above-referenced Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts and
Trustees received financial gain along with their principals, inasmuch as Trustees-attorneys wrote three (3) bonds each
against the Defendant-Trusts and fraudulently placed I (we), Living Beings and True Beneficiaries as surety(ies) and/or
Pseudo-Trustee(s) in order to collect the funds from these bonds, without my (our) consent. I (we) never consented to be
Pseudo-Trustee, nor enter into fraudulent and secret contracts that deprived me (us) of our God-given rights.
65. I (We) the Beneficiaries, have NO fiduciary responsibility(ies) for any security instrument(s) created in the name
of said Trusts by the Court or any Trustee wherein the Trustees aka Officers, Directors, Administrators, Agents, Employees
aka Politicians, Attorneys, Judges, Clerks, Sheriffs, Deputies, Police, Process Servers, Realtors et al, attempted through
conspiracy to remove the lawful beneficiary(ies) and make us, Your First Name, Your Offspring’s First name, the True
Human Beneficiary(ies) accountable for security(ies) created by the Court and Trustees without my (our) consent to my
(our) detriment, which is securities fraud, as well as breach of fiduciary duties.
66. FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Grantee, Claimant, Principal, Beneficiary, and Secured-Party Creditor claim all bonds,
property, funds, proceeds, dividends, interest, reversionary interests in herein referenced security instruments aka
court/bank cusip attaching no.(s)/case no.(s) as joined to the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, (minor
account); These are my property.
67. It is an axiom of law and American Justice that a human is innocent until proven guilty. In a Court-of-Law, we
would not have to prove that we were not exceeding our natural and unalienable rights; the burden of proof would be upon
the Plaintiff. Moreover, in a Court-of-Law, the complainant and his/her/its cohorts would be liable for their criminal actions
if frivolous and fraudulent.
68. The officers and agents of the federal and state-tribunals called “Court” make it next to impossible for the American
Citizens to subpoena the grand jurors and subpoena duces tecum the testimony, whether written, oral or visual, presented to
the jurors in order that one could exercise his/her Right to challenge the jurors, the hearing or the witnesses. This action is
patently treasonous against the American People, the Law of the Land, the Constitution in general and the American form of
government.
69. When an overzealous corporation and its officers arbitrarily decide to deny all the Substantive Rights fought and
died for in Our great Republic, such tyranny must be disciplined. This supports that by statutory construction and
complacency, a conditioned reflexology has manifested the observation of Our fellow human beings as corporate chattel and
not free-living human beings. Thus, the corporate government finds itself consumed in a web that demands the property and
Rights of the people as a tribute for its so-called leadership. History recognizes that, with noble conviction, the law
community assumed a role to champion the Rights of the people, but in the process, Unalienable Rights were lost to
contractual (civil/statute) rights granted by man. Hence, instead of profound Rights from the Heavenly Mother/Father,
secured by Amendments 1-10 of the Constitution for the United States of America, we now have arbitrary rights from
Trustees of fictional entities. Instead of a Constitutional "Republic5," protecting the Rights of each human being, we now
have a creditor (Federal Reserve) democracy promulgating "the good of our (international bankers) majority out-weighs the
good of humanity.”
70. Since the BAR Association took over our government and their avalanche of anti-law-statutes swept over our liberty
and right-ruling, burying it under the well over sixty-million (60,000,000 ++) statutes, the once great patriotic and noble
collective sovereignty known as “We the People” has now become a nation of slaves. You, the men and women acting as
5
Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States, "The United States shall guarantee to Every State in the Union a
Republican Form of government."
32
CEO’s, CFO’s, Officers, Directors, Administrators, Agents, Employees aka Politicians, Attorneys, Judges, Clerks,
Sheriffs, Deputies, Police, Process Servers, Realtors Et Al have proven to be self-indicting by your own admission(s) and
failure to follow your own rules of professional conduct, and your own statutes, laws, regulations and codes.
71. In a gross violation of my (our) God-given Rights protected and secured by State and Federal Constitutions, the
Bill of Rights, and International Treaties, you, Trustees, the living men and women acting as Public Servants, deprived us
of my (our) home and stole my (our) property under the pretense and color of law and color of authority under threat
of bodily harm in violation of your own USC Title 18 § 241 and § 242, and; In an act of trust malfeasance, the failure of
Senior Officers aka Officers, Directors, Administrators etc to take action to render aid and/or prevent the wrongs being
committed against us by their Junior Agents aka Public Servants aka Politicians, Attorneys, Judges, Clerks, Sheriffs,
Deputies, Police, Process Servers, Realtors and their co-horts and accomplices, were given permission and carte blanche
to do as they pleased to us with no accountability and as such is the case, we and the good people of Hawaii were not safe
in my (our) own home(s).
72. My family and I have suffered egregious human rights abuses by Lien-Debtors and all agents and principals
thereof, in violation of International Treaty(ies), in particular provisions set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and; You have been unjustly enriched at my (our)
expense in violation of the Laws of Equity, the Uniform Commercial Code and International Maxims. You have
participated in efforts to tax, extort, detain, search, arrest, prosecute, jail, collect from, disclose on and/or evict me and
members of the Henson Family, intended to raid my (our) beneficiary account(s). You have deprived me (us) of my (our)
God-given rights and liberties, and made theft of my (our) property under the pretense and color of law, and color of
authority, and; I (we) have suffered emotional, psychological, and physical harm, as well as financial and economic
deprivation, by your economic abuse, actions and/or actions for neglect to prevent, both collectively and individually.
73. All Lien-Debtor(s) operate through the creation of causes of actions to include: citations written by the police
departments, trained at the discretion of the State Attorney General, who unconstitutionally takes the rights of the people
and turns them into privileges to be fined at their leisure, and who blatantly disregard any Uniform Commercial Code, as
well as the constitution and common law, as long as the result is the taking of property from a man or woman, and police
officers lie more than not in order to achieve this.
74. Causes of actions include: parenting plans created by the State Department of Human Services, and funding to
support the taking and withholding of biological property, with the main goal being to do anything but return the property
to the mother or father, as this brings no profit whatsoever, while falsely giving the appearance as if the agency truly cares
about this effort and that they care about family integrity. They are required to file affidavits showing they made all
reasonable efforts to keep boys and girls with their mother/father/family; instead they are created out of fraud and lack of
due process and sincere efforts; and more times than not no effort is made and lies are the bases of most cases; division of
children and family services agents receive compensation when taking biological property.
75. Causes of actions include: case numbers created by courts which creates security bonds and profits greater with
each motion filed, and who intentionally creates a division between mother and father in order to promote discord,
therefore the filing of more motions, as harmony would result in less filed motions and no need for the courts to be
involved, and less profit gained by the courts. Disharmony results from the administrative clerk pretending to be a judge
who cares about right and wrong, and the influence of the BAR members who, (more often than not), encourage their
clients to avoid speaking, which creates circumstances conducive to working together for the benefit of the living boy or
girl they created together. These boys and girls who are truly suffering as the result of this harmful conduct of the courts
and attorneys who force people to abide by the courts, and who owe an obligation to the court above all. Attorney’s
Duties: “His first duty is to the courts and to the public, not to the client, and whenever his duties to his client conflict with
those as an officer of the court, in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter.” 7 Corpus Juris
Secundum § 4 Attorneys.
76. Marriage licenses grants the court power over all married men and women, with a total lack of full and honest
disclosure, resulting in the inability of men and women to divorce without the state’s involvement in the matter, after one
has entered into this contract absent rescission of signatures, power of attorney, and contract, and even then the courts
deny people their inherent right to refuse contract and conspire to arrest them and punish them when they assert this God
given rights and rights ensured by our government under the supreme law of the land. People are not given the knowledge
33
that marriage can simply be done by having a ceremony and having two witnesses who were present sign a statement, and
recording it on the land.
78. Causes of actions include: child support cases created by the State Division of Child Support, a private collection
agency and branch of the State Department of Finance and Administration, which has no power to invoke any harmful
action upon any man or woman, but is allowed by the State of Your-State, to solely invoke more fear into the hard
working mother or father or who been treated wrongly as the result of the manner in which the courts operates, and far
less likely as the result of any personal interactions between both mother and father absent of the courts tyrannical and
harmful control, deprived of his/her rights, and forced into more suffering and peonage. Holding them in contempt of
court and throwing them in jail, as if this added struggle is going to actually be beneficial to their son(s) and/or
daughter(s) whom they need to support. It is an obvious contradiction that proves the Lien-Debtor(s), and all principals
and agents participating in the efforts of the agencies it controls, does not care about any living man or woman, boy or
girl, but simply money, and money alone.
79. I delivered via USPS Registered Mail an Affidavit of Truth and Assertory Oath, Repudiation and Revocation of
Citizenship to: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES (RF123456789US); SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES
Antony J. Blinken (RF123456789US); ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES Merrick B. Garland
(RF123456789US); SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF STATE Name of State Secretary of State
(RF123456789US); LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF STATE Name of State Attorney General
(RF123456789US). See this affidavit and proof in attachments.
80. From this point on, state all other facts point by point of your situation, showing how your rights were violated
and who did what to you, and reference to evidence provided in attachments. Include as much as you need to.
“Law and court procedures that are “fair on their faces” but administered “with an evil eye or a heavy hand” was
discriminatory and violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356
(1886)
“Loss of First Amendment Freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.
Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden
of proving which rests on their government.” Elrod v. Burns, 96 S Ct 2673; 427 US 347, (1976)
“Even when blood relationships are strained, parents retain vital interest in preventing irretrievable destruction of their
family life; if anything, persons faced with forced dissolution of their parental rights have more critical need for
procedural protections than do those resisting state intervention into ongoing family affairs” Santosky v. Kramer, 102 S Ct
1388; 455 US 745 (1982)
"Not every action by any judge is in exercise of his judicial function. It is not a judicial function for a Judge to commit an
intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the Courthouse, when a judge acts as a Trespasser of the Law, when a judge
does not follow the law, the judge loses subject matter jurisdiction and The Judge's orders are void, of no legal force or
effect"! Yates Vs. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962)
"Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or
fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is where the court or a member is corrupted, or influenced, or
influence is attempted, or where the judge has not performed his judicial function --- i.e., where the impartial functions of
the court have been directly corrupted.“ Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985)
“It is a fundamental right of a party to have a neutral and detached judge preside over the judicial proceedings.” Ward v
Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62, 93 S.Ct 80, 83, 34 L.Ed. 2d 267 (1972); Tumey v Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 5209,
47 S. Ct. 437, 440, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927)
"Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or
fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is where the court or a member is corrupted, or influenced, or
34
influence is attempted, or where the judge has not performed his judicial function --- i.e., where the impartial functions of
the court have been directly corrupted.“ Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985)
“brutum fulmen”: “An empty noise; an empty threat. A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment
at all, and by which no rights are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone.
Dollert v. Pratt Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex. Civ. Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum,
“Judgments” §§ 499, 512 546, 549. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition
“In arriving at our decision in this matter we do not depart in any way from our holding in Huendling v. Jensen that the
doctrine of judicial immunity extends to courts of limited jurisdiction. But, when a minor magistrate acts wholly without
jurisdiction, civil liability attaches for his malicious and corrupt abuse of process and his willful and malicious oppression
of any person under the pretense of acting in his official capacity. See Huendling v. Jensen, 168 N.W.2d at 749 and
authorities cited.”188 N.W.2d 294; 1971 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 863; 64 A.L.R.3d 1242
"A departure by a court from those recognized and established requirements of law however close apparent adherence to
mere form in methods of procedure which has the effect of depriving one of a constitutional right, is an excess of
jurisdiction.” Wuest v. Wuest, 127 P2d 934, 937.
"Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is deprived of juris." Merritt
v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739
"Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private
citizen...where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned. ... For
purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government.” Clearfield
Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943)
“…cannot assume facts not in evidence, even if judge believes facts to be accurate.” Government of the Virgin Islands v.
Gereau, 523 F.2d 140 (1975)
112. No police officer, court, or agent of any corporation are allowed to fraudulently create a ‘state of emergency’ for
revenue! This creates unrighteous behavior in the form of lies and abuse, and so many gaps, which gives leeway for these
agents to lie and manipulate the system for gain and profit! There must be a true state of emergency based upon very strict
guidelines, which is ‘injury in fact’, which has already been previously defined, yet it is stated once more for the purpose
of reiterating this, as it is very CRUCIAL and IMPORTANT!
Common law states there must be a victim or injured party. Any court or tribunal cannot be the injured party.
The “State” cannot be the injured party. No agency can be the injured party. No “person” can be the injured
party. No corporation can be the injured party. The victim/injured party must be a living breathing man or
woman. All courts are required to bring forth an injured man or woman and show with evidence that he/she has
caused injury or harm, which is defined as:
“To satisfy Article lll’s standing requirements, a plaintiff must show (1) it has suffered an ‘injury in fact’ that is (a)
concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) the injury is fairly
traceable to the challenged action of the defendant; and (3) it is likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the
injury will be redressed by a favorable….” Jujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555 (1992)
ArtIII.S2.C1.6.4.2 Concrete Injury
“First, to have an injury-in-fact, a litigant must establish that he has suffered or is imminently threatened with a
“concrete” injury-that is, an injury that is “real” and not “abstract”. Particularized means it affects the injured
party individually.
“Over the years, our cases have established that the irreducible constitutional minimum of standing contains three
elements. First, the plaintiff must have suffered an “injury in fact”, an invasion of a legally protected interest
which is (a) concrete and particularized, see id., at 756; Warth v. Seldin, 422 U. S. 490, 508 (1975); Sierra Club v.
Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 740-741, n. 16 (1972); [1] and (b) “actual or imminent, not ‘conjectural’, or ‘hypothetical’,”
Whitmore, supra, at 155 (quoting Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 102 (1983). Second, there must be a causal
35
connection between injury and the conduct complained of-the injury has to be “fairly…trace[able] to the
challenged action of the defendant, and not…th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party not before
the court,” Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U.S. 26, 41-42 (1976). Third, it must be “likely”
as opposed to merely “speculative”, that the injury will be “redressed by a favorable decision”.
“The Court has also held that a litigant may have standing when it alleges injury from the federal government’s
disregard of the basic structure of government established in the Constitution.” Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 755
(1984)
The United States Code was put into place to keep employees of the UNITED STATES corporation and any and all
corporations branching from it in check; it was not put in place to keep the ‘free People’ in check.
113. Be It Known: This Claim of Commercial Lien is also a Conditional Acceptance and is governed under the
Postal Rule to wit, which establishes a Common Law-contract6 between Us.
“The postal rule (also known as the mailbox rule or “deposited acceptance rule”) is a term of common law-
contracts which determines the timing of acceptance of an offer when mail is contemplated as the medium of
acceptance. The general principle is that a contract is formed when acceptance is actually communicated to the
offeror. The mailbox rule is an exception to the general principle. The mailbox rule provides that the contract is
formed when a properly addressed letter of acceptance is posted. One rationale given for the rule is that the offeror
nominates the Post Office as implied agent and thus receipt of the acceptance by the post office is regarded as that
of the offeree. The main effect of the mailbox rule is that risk of acceptance being delivered late or lost in the post
is place upon the offeror. If the offeror is reluctant to accept this risk, he can always require receipt before being
legally bound.”
Be it also known: That I am also not bound by any unwanted contract should I use any term used by common people that
would otherwise, and unbeknownst to them, bind them into contract.
VII: Conditions:
I conditionally accept the role and actions in the wrongs committed against me and my family in the herein-referenced
matters, provided the following conditions are met:
1. If Lien-Debtor(s) and all agents and principals aforementioned, given notice by means of this document, have
information that would controvert and overcome the facts and claims herein, you must respond point by point, enumerated
and articulated within ten [10] days from receipt hereof, granting two (2) days for service, stating all requisite actual
evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law and not merely the ultimate facts or conclusions of law, that the facts and
claims herein are substantially and materially false sufficiently to change materially my status and factual declarations.
2. Failure to object timely means you waive the objection. Valid Responses must be given in written Affidavit Form,
under oath and full commercial liability and notarized. Invalid non-responsive responses, or failure to answer, will result in
default, permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence should any conflict arise at any time in the future for any
reason.
3. If (you) Lien-Debtors and all agents and principals thereof, do not respond to the facts and claims herein point by
point, enumerated and articulated with facts and law supporting any denial and/or objection within ten (10) days, granting
two (2) days for service, all facts and claims not addressed are thereby acquiesced to by Trustees and your principals. Your
silence stands as consent to and tacit approval, acknowledgment, and acceptance of, the factual declarations herein being
established as fact as a matter of law.
4. It is possible that I may have other conditions based on the satisfaction of the conditions listed herein, so I reserve
the right to amend this Conditional Acceptance if your responses are opaque or ambiguous so that we may be precise in
36
our contractual language. Moreover, if you do not understand any of the facts and claims herein, notify me in writing so
that I can clarify what is intended.
5. If, on the other hand, (you) Lien-Debtors and all agents and principals thereof, cannot satisfy these conditions in
the time allotted, allowing for a reasonable extension if requested in writing stating specific time needed and since your
documentation witnesses, amongst other facts addressed in this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional
Acceptance, you agree that you willfully, knowingly and maliciously were seeking to commit fraud both against me and
the CSM, Cestui Que (Vie) Social Trust(s), and deprive me of my rights and property, and you hereby contract to the
following :
Demand is Hereby Made For:
IMMEDIATE RETURN OF STOLEN BIOLOGICAL PROPERTY: Demand is hereby made for the immediate
return of my biological property, First Middle Last©™ (if your offspring were kidnapped).
CORRECTION OF THE RECORD: Demand is hereby made that any and all “negative claims, opinions or
comments” associated with the herein referenced “alleged debts” aka Court Case No.(s) that were filed and/or registered
with any municipality, entity, department, franchise or sub-franchise et al of STATE OF STATE and/or COUNTY OF
COUNTY (or any other county in the State) aka County County, and/or COUNTY OF COUNTY aka County County,
that have been entered into the public record by Lien-Debtors and all principals and agents and/or interested parties
involving me and/or members of the Last Name Family that are slanderous to me and the Last Name Family’s good
name(s), be corrected to reflect this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance, Common Law Contract.
In the event that Trustees fail to correct the record within sixty (60) days postmark of this presentment, it is agreed that
Trustees and their principals have no recourse preventing me from correcting the public record to reflect this Common
Law-contract, in whatever form or manner I deem necessary.
DEPRIVATION, AND LOSS OF USE AND ENJOYMENT OF HOME AND PROPERTY: Demand is hereby made
for just compensation in the amount of Five-hundred-million ($500,000,000.00) and no 100/cents each Principal, and
One-hundred-million ($100,000,000.00) Dollars and no/100 Cents each each agent of Lien-Debtor mentioned for
deprivation and loss of enjoyment and use, and my (our) Equity and Interest (life force energy-sweat labor) if my
biological property is not returned to me and all cases and the above referenced citations are not vacated and
expunged; (state the demand that is fitting to your situation)
KIDNAPPING, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, SLAVERY, ENTICEMENT TO SLAVERY, PEONAGE,
IDENTITY THEFT, TRUST MALFEASANCE: Demand is hereby made for compensation in the amount of Five-
hundred-million ($500,000,000.00) Dollars and no/100 Cents each Principal and One-hundred-million ($100,000,000.00)
Dollars and no 100/Cents each agent of Lien-Debtor mentioned if my biological property is not returned to me and all
cases and the above referenced citations are not vacated and expunged; (state the demand that is fitting to your
situation)
FOR BARRATRY, SLANDER, AND LIBEL: Demand is hereby made for Five-hundred-million ($500,000,000.00)
and no 100/cents each Principal and One-hundred-million ($100,000,000.00) Dollars and no/100 Cents each agent of
Lien-Debtor mentioned, to be assessed on an annual basis until such time as the record is corrected as above-demanded if
my biological property is not returned to me and all cases and the above referenced citations are not vacated and
expunged; (state the demand that is fitting to your situation)
ACTIONS FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT, AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY: Demand is hereby made for
Five-hundred-million ($500,000,000.00) and no 100/cents each Principal and One-hundred-million ($100,000,000.00)
Dollars and no/100 Cents each agent of Lien-Debtor mentioned if my biological property is not returned to me and all
situation)
MALFEASANCE AND LOSS OF RECOUPMENT: I am entitled to recoupment of all Securities (bonds) created in
the name of the CSM Trust regarding the herein referenced Court/Bank Case I.d. (Cusip) No.(s) and all associated
37
Court/Bank Case I.d. (Cusip) No.(s). Demand is hereby made for compensation in the amount of Five-hundred-million
($500,000,000.00) and no 100/cents each Principal of THE STATE OF STATE if my biological property is not
returned to me and all cases and the above referenced citations are not vacated and expunged; (state the demand
that is fitting to your situation)
NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS: Demand is hereby made for compensation in the amount
of Five-hundred-million ($500,000,000.00) and no 100/cents each Principal, and One-hundred-million ($100,000,000.00)
Dollars and no 100/cents each agent of Lien-Debtor mentioned if my biological property is not returned to me and all
situation)
METHOD AND USE OF PAYMENT: All demands for payment herein shall be payable in the form of real money.
Gold or Silver or US Postal Money Order, shall suffice. If you are unable to provide me with Gold or Silver or US Postal
Money Order, then in lieu thereof, I accept money of account of the United States of America, Constitution for the United
States of America, Article I, Section 10 and if the money of account is not available I would “receive without prejudice”
payment in lieu of the money of account, a Treasury Direct Deposit, or Bank-Draft of the United-States Dollars or
whatever currency is prescribed as lawful currency in satisfaction of all debts, whether Public or Private in the County in
which this claim is filed, and; In any case shall be in a form that shall be readily available and accessible for distribution
to the Beneficiary/Claimant (me) upon demand and readily accessible by me as duly authorized signatory via line of
credit, negotiable instrument, treasury direct deposit and/or other form deemed necessary and/or applicable to and in such
form that is freely transmissible and inheritable by beneficiary’s (my) heirs, and/or assigns to be used to compensate and
uplift me and my family who have suffered egregious human rights violations and who have been down-trodden and
oppressed whether intentionally or through gross neglect, knowingly or unknowingly by the men and women herein
acting as Trustees, Public Servants, and/or Participating and Interested Parties et al.
Given that my (our) time and soul’s life force energy is priceless, and; given the length of time Trustees and Principals
have been unjustly enriched at the expense my (our) rights, life and liberties, and have profited from my (our) life force
energy, the above demands are reasonable, just, equitable and fair.
YOUR RESPONSIBILTY: I understand it may take up to sixty (60) days for you to correct the record, facilitate
recoupment and meet the above referenced demands, but I require a good-faith letter from you, within ten (10) days of
the postmark on this communication, acknowledging receipt of this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional
Acceptance, Indenture Agreement - Indemnity Bond and your good-faith intention to meet the herein-referenced
demands, return my property, compensate me for damages, and correct the record.
ACTIONS FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT/EVASION OF RESPONSIBILITY: I (we) am (are) entitled to

restitution, compensation, recoupment, correction of the record, and the return of my (our) property. Therefore, this Claim
of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance - Private Settlement - Indemnity and Security - Agreement is not
subject any evasive action (i.e. bankruptcy etc) by any wo/man, acting as Trustee, Public Servant, Officer, Director,
Agent, Employee, Contractor, Participant, Interested Party(ies) et al, and/or others similarly situated and is binding upon
all Former, Current, and/or Successor Trustees and their Principals.
If it is discovered that any wo/man acting as Trustee, Public Servant, Officer, Director, Agent, Employee, Contractor,
Participant, Interested Party(ies) et al, and/or others similarly situated, fails, refuses, and/or attempts to evade
responsibility by whatever means (bankruptcy etc) and/or in any way interferes with the fulfillment and/or enforcement of
this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance - Private Settlement - Indemnity and Security-
Agreement, and the conditions and demands set forth herein, they agree Beneficiary/Claimant (me) is entitled to and
authorized to file and enforce a claim for triple the amount of the above-referenced demands against each Principal,
Trustee, Public Servant, Officer, Director, Agent, Employee, Contractor, and/or Participating and Interested Parties et al
or others similarly situated to be assessed on an annual basis without further notice to until all demands are met and all
monies are recovered in full and issued to Beneficiary/Claimant (me) per the terms and conditions herein.
DEFAULT: If after ten (10) days, I have received no good faith letter from you, you agree your non-response is
evidence of your failure and/or refusal to perform and dishonor and in that you have no good faith intention to meet the
above-referenced demands, return my property, compensate me for damages, and correct the record having been given the
opportunity and you thereby consent to all necessary collection procedures.
38
Failure to respond pursuant to the said terms of response or specifically perform under this Claim of Commercial Lien
and Conditional Acceptance - Private Settlement - Indemnity and Security-Agreement, will comprise a default on
your part. As an Operation of Law, a default will comprise your agreement, consent and confession to all of the terms,
statements and facts herein and herewith and all inclusions and (en)ndorsements, front and back, annexed hereto.
Your default will comprise your confession to holding all liability in the aforesaid cases, and associated matters and
your stipulation that I have exhausted my administrative remedy(ies) and your consent to all necessary collection
procedures. As well, your default will comprise your confession to your role in committing Kidnapping, Enslavement,
Enticement to Slavery, Identity Theft, Constructive Fraud, Unlawful Conversion, Peonage, Benefitting Financially from
Peonage7, Slavery, and Trafficking in Persons, Extortion, Conspiracy Against Rights, Deprivation of Rights Under Color
of Law, Racketeering, Theft, Theft of Property Lost, Mislaid, or Delivered by Mistake, Terroristic Threatening, Coercion,
Trespass, Barratry, Slander, Libel, Trust Malfeasance, Trust Fraud and/or at the very minimum, Actions for Neglect to
Prevent, Reckless Disregard, and Gross Negligence against Me and Members of the Henson Family, the True
Beneficiaries, as well as multiple violations of Constitutional Provisions, United States Code, International Treaties and
Maxims and your own Corporate Statutes, Laws, Rules, Regulations and Codes.
Your default will comprise your agreement to the arrest of your bonds and to the filing of criminal complaints and/or a
tort and/or a claim of lien / lien on the real and movable property, D-U-N-S Number, malpractice bond(s) and non-
performance bond(s) of each and every Trustee, Public Servant, Officer, Director, Agent, Employee, Contractor,
Participant, Interested Party(ies) et al, and/or others similarly situated.
At the expiration of ten (10) days of the date of this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance - Private
Settlement, Indemnity and Security-Agreement, upon your failure to provide the above referenced demands will
constitute a breach of contract with a summary judgment and claim of lien / lien on the real and movable property,
malpractice bond(s) and non-performance bond(s) of each and every Trustee and all others similarly situated et al, to be
offered to the international community for execution and/or a claim of lien / lien to be filed for assignment and collection
with the United States Treasury, United Department of the Treasury et al and/or other action I deem appropriate and/or
necessary.
SELF EXECUTING POWER OF ATTORNEY/AUTHORITY: To facilitate your strict compliance with all of the
terms of Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance, Private Settlement - Indemnity and Security-
Agreement, Common Law-contract, if you fail to correct the default within ten (10) days, you give, by remaining
silent, unlimited power of attorney to me to sign and execute for you regarding enforcement of your obligations under this
Contract. In that event, you instruct and authorize me to execute Trustees signature(s) in representative capacity on a Self-
executing
Power of attorney document. In order to facilitate my rights under this contract, you agree that I have your Power of
Authority/Attorney to file anything to bring about the “payment” of this debt and protect me, my property and my rights
and that you have no right for action or recourse in any action at law, action in equity or Admiralty or any other law herein
written or implied against me or my filings.
Additionally, you agree that you grant your Power of Attorney and Authority to me so that I am able to collect the
damages through liens8, UCC-1 Financing Statement, UCC 3 Assignment, Treasury Forms 1040V and 1040, 1099-OID or
any other form deemed necessary and you agree that every year an additional set of liens can be filed with the Department
of the Treasury and/or other Trustee, or Principal if such injury to me persists on a yearly basis and until such time as the
record is corrected, my property is returned to me and I am justly compensated. It is understood that even though a
Treasury Form 1040 is for a Tax Class 2 and the 1099-A and 1099-OID are a Tax Class 5, I do not know any other way of
filing this debt for collection other than to use these forms, so I use them or similar forms “without prejudice.”
7
“Peonage” - Definition & Citations: The state or condition of a peou as above defined; a condition of enforced servitude, by which
the servitor is restrained of his liberty and compelled to labor in liquidation of some debt or obligation, real or pretended, against his will.
Peonage Cases (D. C.) 123 Fed. 071; In re Lewis (C. C.) 114 Fed. 903 ; U. S. v. McClel- lan (D. C.) 127 Fed. 971; Rev. St. U. S. ~ Blacks Law
Dictionary, 2nd Edition
8
“The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of
probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times.” United States Supreme Court, (1968, Sniadach v. family Finance
Corp., 395 U.S. 357, 349
39
Be it understood: This contract grants me authority to file additional liens in regards to violations of my God-given rights
and rights granted by the constitution of the united States of America unincorporated, in the amount of One-hundred-
million ($100,000,000.00) Dollars and no/100 Cents for agent(s) of any corporation conspiring and depriving me of
my FREE RIGHTS and in the amount of Five-hundred-million for principal(s) of any corporation conspiring and
depriving me of my FREE RIGHTS, and; in regards to my property that I exclusively own, which the STATE OF
STATE are claiming is owned by the corporation-created Trust, FIRST MIDDLE LAST, such as automobiles, real
property/estate, monies, and all other private property not mentioned here. The Trust was not involved in the sweat and
labor required to acquire this private property, but was acquired by me as a living human being, and not in relation to the
Trust YOUR-NAME by and through its Trustees. All of my property is private and belongs to the FIRST MIDDLE
LAST©™ TRUST/Your Trust Name, of which I am Grantor and Trustee for. This trust takes precedence over any
and all other trusts due to the inherent nature of FREEDOM, which is our natural right given by GOD, and is the
FOUNDATION OF AMERICA and what America stands for.
Be it understood: This contract grants me authority to file additional liens in regards to hinderance of my God-
given and usa constitutional rights by any agency or agent acting on behalf of the STATE and UNITED STATES
corporation.
Be it also understood: This contract does not preclude me nor any member of my family from seeking and receiving any
other remedy that may be available to me (us) involving the herein referenced matters.
AUTHORIZATION TO ACT: I know of no other way to facilitate this contract other than to authorize you to do
whatever is necessary to facilitate the foregoing demands. You are hereby authorized to take all steps necessary to
facilitate the foregoing demands. It is my intent by authorizing you to take all necessary steps to facilitate the foregoing
demands to provide remedy for wrongs committed.
If in the event, I have overlooked anything, you are hereby authorized to take all steps necessary to meet the terms and
conditions of this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance / Private Settlement - Indemnity and
Security-Agreement.
HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNITY AGREEMENT: Trustee's while acting in your official capacities agree to hold the
Grantor/Beneficiary, First-Middle: Last, man/woman harmless from any liability or loss by indemnification and bond
from any and all possible taxable terminations, transfers, distributions, direct skips originating from the Legal Estate of
the Decedent, FIRST MIDDLE LAST political commercial account No, XXXXX1234 (ss#;delete this) involving Court
Name d/b/a Name No. Case Number (2) Court Name d/b/a Name No. Case Number (3) All other courts in the State of
State associated with the FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Cestui Que (Vie) Trust and/or this Living Soul, First-Middle: Last,
and/or this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance / Private Settlement - Indemnity and Security-
Agreement and matters herein.
CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT: Furthermore, witnessed through this “Agreement” you willfully and knowingly
injured me, so I have authority to create a lien against you each and file a financing statement against you each supporting
my lien as I deem necessary to protect me, my property and my rights if needed at any time.
ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE: Your Default will comprise your agreement that all issues pertaining to this
Common Law-contract are deemed settled and closed res judicata, stare decisis and collateral estoppel and as a result,
judgment by estoppel.
IT IS DECLARED: There now exists this Common Law-contract between us and what I expect of you, Lien-Debtor(s),
to remain on your side of the Declaration of Rights that precedes and attaches to the State of State Constitution and that
you remain in the state constitution and out of my domain which is the Declaration of the Bill of Rights.
WAIVER OF RIGHTS. CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT: Your Default will comprise your consent, agreement and
confession to waive any and all rights to raise a controversy, appeal, object to, or controvert administratively or
judicially any of the terms and provisions in this Contract or the Estoppel, as well as your consent to serving as a
successor surety for all obligations, commercial and corporeal, attributed to the account.
40
Upon Default, you and your agents may not argue, controvert, or protest the finality of the administrative findings to
which you have agreed unless such Waiver of Rights which follows is declined in writing. Any such argument or
controversy will comprise your confession to perjury, barratry, enticement to slavery and various crimes against
humanity. The respondent’s confession of judgment in the said amount is res judicata and stare decisis.
DENIAL OF WAIVER OF RIGHTS - I/We, Trustees:

________________________, ________________________, ________________________,
________________________,
hereby acknowledge that I/We have received, read and fully understand this administrative remedy presentment with
attachments, endorsements and schedules and do hereby reserve the right to raise a justiciable controversy by exhibiting
verified proof of claim and loss no later than __________ must be within ten (10) days of date of signing below unless
written permission for a longer period of time is obtained in writing from Claimant.
Trustees signature(s):
___________________ Date: ____________ ___________________ Date: ____________
___________________ Date: ____________ ___________________ Date: ____________
NON-RESPONSE - NON-PERFORMANCE: Your Non-Response/Non-Performance is evidence that I, FIRST

MIDDLE LAST©™, have exhausted my administrative remedies and that you, Lien-Debtor(s), have elected to waive all
rights to raise a controversy or claim immunity from collection proceedings, having declined the opportunity to plead,
and; Your Documented Non-Response/Non-Performance shall serve as Summary Judgment/Default Judgment, and your
agreement to all Terms and Conditions of this Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance – Private
Settlement, Indemnity and Security-Agreement.
This Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance is filed against all Lien-Debtor(s) and their principals and
agents aforementioned, in order to prevent evasion of financial liability, to prevent attachment for the satisfaction of suits
and liens, to prevent threatened financial harm, and to protect from physical and emotional harm likely to occur should
this claim of commercial lien and conditional acceptance not be in place.
FIRST MIDDLE LAST©™: I am the claimant above named; I have read the foregoing claim and know the
contents thereof, and believe same to be just.
Claimant:
Date_______________________ By: ________________________________

FIRST MIDDLE LAST©™,
Grantor and Trustee
Trust Name
41
State State }
} av.
County County }
Subscribed and sworn to before me this _____ day of _________________, 2023: Current Era.
___________________________________
Notary Public Written signature
My commission expires: ____________________
42

Example Claim of Lien and Conditional Acceptance

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Example Claim of Lien and Conditional Acceptance

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

This is the instruction page.

Modify the rest of the document paying close

Claim of Commercial Lien and Conditional Acceptance

I, FIRST MIDDLE LAST, depose and say as follows:

FIRST MIDDLE LAST

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF STATE

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF STATE

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

STATE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

STATE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

State House of Representatives

The following is the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for

With Completion of Service and designation of Witnesses To:

Office of the Secretary of State

United States D.O.J.,

Department of the Treasury

Dear Name of State Attorney General,

To serve as Mail-Acceptor for the above referenced,

3. Forcing me into contracts against my will:

4. Conspiracy to deprive rights under color of law:

Title 9-110.000 Organized Crime and Racketeering

Difference between automobile and vehicle:

The distinction is made very clear in Title 18 USC 31:

The term "travel" is a significant term and is defined as:

The term "driver" in contradistinction to "traveler," is defined as:

10. Treason against me, one of “the People”

11. Failure to Protect

International Commercial Maxims:

 “An act done by me against my will is not my act.” Brac. 101b

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Article 9 - No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Trustor - A person who creates a trust, also called a Settlor.

III. Notice of Status, Understanding and Claim

42 U.S.C. § 1301 – Definitions

ArtIII.S2.C1.6.4.2 Concrete Injury

I am not a private person.

17. I, a man/woman, claim my “un-a-lien-able” God-given rights are my property, and;

ArtIII.S2.C1.6.4.2 Concrete Injury

Demand is Hereby Made For:

ACTIONS FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT/EVASION OF RESPONSIBILITY: I (we) am (are) entitled to

DENIAL OF WAIVER OF RIGHTS - I/We, Trustees:

___________________ Date: ____________ ___________________ Date: ____________

___________________ Date: ____________ ___________________ Date: ____________

NON-RESPONSE - NON-PERFORMANCE: Your Non-Response/Non-Performance is evidence that I, FIRST

Date_______________________ By: ________________________________

My commission expires: ____________________

You might also like

_________ Date: _ Date: ____

_________ Date: _ Date: ____

Date_ By: __________