Business Law Legal Environment Online Commerce Business Ethics and International Issues 9th Edition Cheeseman Solutions Manual
Business Law Legal Environment Online Commerce Business Ethics and International Issues 9th Edition Cheeseman Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/download/business-law-legal-environment-online-commerce-
business-ethics-and-international-issues-9th-edition-cheeseman-solutions-manual/
2 COURTS
AND JURISDICTION
“I was never ruined but twice: once when I lost a lawsuit, and once when I won one.”
Voltaire
Twenty-first century technological advances have provided our students with all kinds of
instant access to information. These devices have provided the students with a variety of
preconceptions.
Among these is the average undergraduate’s notion of how trials are conducted and the role
of attorneys in that process. Invariably these perceptions center on popular television series such
as “Law and Order” and “Court TV.” This is not all bad. Current media focus on numerous law-
related issues has generated a whole new wave of public interest in the workings of our legal
system. The downside is that the media has created many myths on the folklore of law and
lawyers. In the world of pop culture, no one knows until the end who really did it until a surprise
witness shows up to identify the bad guy. In more modern versions, the attorney first has a
business relationship with the client and then proceeds to get him or her acquitted. Regardless of
the outcome, the process is always full of glamour and intrigue.
The problem is that a trial rarely resembles the goings on found in the entertainment media.
Trials are long, tedious, emotionally, and financially draining processes for all parties concerned.
In many ways, a trial represents a failure by the parties to reach some sort of satisfactory solution
of the issue beforehand. Rarely do the parties actually want to go through a labyrinth of
pleadings, motions, and the like, feeling all the while totally dependent on the sometimes
questionable competence of their attorneys. Unlike the make-believe world of entertainment, the
job of an attorney is to keep his or her client out of court. (This often needs some reinforcement
with the student.) The attorney’s professional advice should anticipate and resolve potential legal
problems before, rather than after, the fact if at all possible.
It is against this backdrop that we should try to present a more realistic picture of how our
system works. We can basically start by discussing how few controversies actually get to the trial
stage and how even fewer of those are actually reported in the National Reporter System.
Additionally, a fair amount of time should be spent reviewing the growing trend toward
alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms. Personal experience examples might be helpful
in illustrating the growing trends toward ADR. To complete the cycle, we can then proceed to
itemize the key steps used in a court trial in this chapter and in those that follow.
9
Copyright ©2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
If the dispute or controversy needs to be resolved in a court of law, which court has
jurisdiction?
Once jurisdiction is established, was the proper sequence of pretrial steps taken?
Was the trial sequence properly followed?
After the trial is completed, are any appeals from the decision applicable?
One objective of this chapter is to familiarize students with the role of the major players in those
events.
The federal court system and the court systems of the 50 states and the District of Columbia are
the two major court systems in the U.S. Litigation is the process of bringing, maintaining, and
defending a lawsuit. In addition, there are a number of alternative dispute resolutions that can be
used.
Limited-Jurisdiction Trial Court – Inferior trials like traffic courts, juvenile courts, justice-of-
the peace courts, probate courts, and family law courts hear specialized matters. Another example
of these is the small claim courts that hear limited dollar amount civil cases.
General-Jurisdiction Trial Court – Courts of Record keep a record of the testimony and
evidence presented at trial for future reference. These courts hear felony cases, civil cases over a
certain dollar amount, and other items.
Intermediate Appellate Court – Courts of Appeal hear appeals from trial courts, reviewing
records of trials for errors without hearing any new evidence.
Highest State Court – State supreme courts hear appeals from intermediate state courts and
some trial courts, without hearing new evidence.
10
Copyright ©2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
Courts and Jurisdiction
U.S. District Courts – These are the federal court system’s 94 trial courts of general jurisdiction.
U.S. Courts of Appeal – These are the federal court system’s 13 intermediate appellate courts.
Jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court – The Supreme Court hears appeals from the federal
district courts and from the highest state courts. Legal briefs are filed, oral arguments are made,
lower court records are reviewed, but neither new evidence nor testimony is heard. The Supreme
Court decision is final.
Decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court – Congress has established the rules for the mandatory
appellate review by the Supreme Court, which may also elect to hear cases at its discretion.
Petitioners file a petition for certiorari asking for the Supreme Court to review their case. If the
court decides to sit on the matter, it issues a writ of certiorari. The court hears about 100 cases per
year.
Unanimous Decisions – All the justices voting agree as to both the outcome and the
reasoning. These decisions become precedent.
Majority Decision – Decisions by the Supreme Court are considered majority decisions
if a majority of the justices agree on the outcome and reasoning. These decisions become
precedent.
Plurality Decision – A plurality decision is when the majority of the justices agree on the
outcome, but not the reasoning. This settles the case, but does not serve as precedent.
Tie Decision – In this case, the winner in the lower court prevails. This does not serve as
precedent.
Concurring Opinion – When a justice agrees with the outcome of the majority, but not
the reasoning, they will issue a concurring opinion explaining their stand.
11
Copyright ©2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
in the history both of the Republicans and the republic—the name of
that noble soldier and favorite child of victory, Philip H. Sheridan.
In the spirit of these great leaders and of our own devotion to
human liberty, and with that hostility to all forms of despotism and
oppression which is the fundamental idea of the Republican party,
we add fraternal congratulation to our fellow-Americans of Brazil
upon their great set of emancipation, which completed the abolition
of slavery throughout the two American continents. We earnestly
hope that we may soon congratulate our fellow-citizens of Irish birth
upon the peaceful recovery of Home Rule for Ireland.
We reaffirm our unswerving devotion to the National Constitution
and to the indissoluble union of the States; to the autonomy reserved
to the States under the Constitution; to the personal rights and
liberties of citizens in all the States and Territories in the Union, and
especially to the supreme and sovereign right of every lawful citizen,
rich or poor, native or foreign born, white or black, to cast one free
ballot in public elections, and to have that duly counted. We hold the
free and honest popular ballot and the just and equal representation
of all the people to be the foundation of our Republican government,
and demand effective legislation to secure the integrity and purity of
elections, which are the fountains of all public authority. We charge
that the present administration and the Democratic majority in
Congress owe their existence to the suppression of the ballot by a
criminal nullification of the Constitution and laws of the United
States.
We are uncompromisingly in favor of the American system of
protection. We protest against its destruction as proposed by the
President and his party. They serve the interests of Europe; we will
support the interests of America. We accept the issue and confidently
appeal to the people for their judgment. The protective system must
be maintained. Its abandonment has always been followed by
general disaster to all interests except those of the usurer and the
sheriff. We denounce the Mills bill as destructive to the general
business, the labor and the farming interests of the country, and we
heartily endorse the consistent and patriotic action of the Republican
Representatives in Congress in opposing its passage.
We condemn the proposition of the Democratic party to place wool
on the free list, and we insist that the duties thereon shall be adjusted
and maintained so as to furnish full and adequate protection to that
industry.
The Republican party would effect all needed reduction of the
national revenue by repealing the taxes upon tobacco, which are an
annoyance and burden to agriculture, and the tax upon spirits used
in the arts and for mechanical purposes, and by such revision of the
tariff laws as will tend to check imports of such articles as are
produced by our people, the production of which gives employment
to our labor, and release from import duties those articles of foreign
production (except luxuries) the like of which cannot be produced at
home. If there shall still remain a larger revenue than is requisite for
the wants of the Government, we favor the entire repeal of internal
taxes rather than the surrender of any part of our protective system
at the joint behest of the whisky trusts and the agents of foreign
manufacturers.
We declare our hostility to the introduction into this country of
foreign contract labor, and of Chinese labor, alien to our civilization
and our Constitution, and we demand the rigid enforcement of the
existing laws against it, and favor such immediate legislation as will
exclude such labor from our shores.
We declare our opposition to all combinations of capital organized
in trusts or otherwise to control arbitrarily the condition of trade
among our citizens, and we recommend to Congress and to the State
Legislatures in their respective jurisdictions such legislation as will
prevent the execution of all the schemes to oppress the people by
undue charges on their supplies, or by the unjust rates for the
transportation of their products to market. We approve the
legislation by Congress to prevent alike unjust burdens and unfair
discriminations between the States.
We reaffirm the policy of appropriating the public lands of the
United States to be homesteads for American citizens and settlers,
not aliens, which the Republican party established in 1862, against
the persistent opposition of the Democrats in Congress, and which
has brought our great western domain into such magnificent
development. The restoration of unearned railroad land grants to the
public domain, for the use of the actual settlers, which was begun
under the administration of President Arthur, should be continued.
We deny that the Democratic party has ever revoked one acre to the
people, but declare that, by the joint action of Republicans and
Democrats, about fifty millions of acres of unearned lands originally
granted for the construction of railroads have been restored to the
public domain, in pursuance of the conditions inserted by the
Republican party in the original grants. We charge the Democratic
administration with failure to execute the laws securing to settlers
titles to their homesteads, and with using appropriations made for
that purpose to harass innocent settlers with spies and prosecutions
under the false pretence of exposing frauds and vindicating the law.
The Government by Congress of the Territories is based upon
necessity only, to the end that they may become States in the Union;
therefore, whenever the conditions of population, material resources,
public intelligence and morality are such as to insure a stable
Government therein, the people of such territories should be
permitted, as a right inherent in them, the right to form for
themselves constitutions and State Governments and be admitted
into the Union. Pending the preparation for statehood, all officers
thereof should be selected from the bona fide residents and citizens
of the territory wherein they are to serve. South Dakota should of
right be immediately admitted as a State in the Union under the
Constitution framed and adopted by her people, and we heartily
endorse the action of the Republican Senate in twice passing bills for
admission. The refusal of the Democratic House of Representatives,
for partisan purposes, to favorably consider these bills, is a willful
violation of the sacred American principle of local self government
and merits the condemnation of all just men. The pending bills in the
Senate for acts to enable the people of Washington, North Dakota
and Montana territories to form Constitutions and establish State
Governments, should be passed without unnecessary delay. The
Republican party pledges itself to do all in its power to facilitate the
admission of the Territories of New Mexico, Wyoming, Idaho and
Arizona to the enjoyment of self-government as States, such of them
as are not qualified as soon as they may become so.
The political power of the Mormon church in the Territories, as
exercised in the past, is a menace to free institutions, a danger no
longer to be suffered;
Therefore, we pledge the Republican party to appropriate
legislation asserting the sovereignty of the Nation in all Territories
where the same is questioned, and in furtherance of that end to place
upon the statute books legislation stringent enough to divorce the
political from the ecclesiastical power, and thus stamp out the
attendant wickedness of polygamy.
The Republican party is in favor of the use of both gold and silver
as money, and condemns the policy of the Democratic
Administration in its efforts to demonetize silver.
We demand the reduction of letter postage to one cent per ounce.
In a Republic like ours, where the citizen is the sovereign and the
official the servant; where no power is exercised except by the will of
the people, it is important that the sovereign—the people—should
possess intelligence. The free school is the promoter of that
intelligence which is to preserve us as a free nation; the State or
nation, or both combined, should support free institutions of
learning sufficient to afford to every child growing up in the land the
opportunity of a good common-school education.
We earnestly recommend that prompt action be taken by Congress
in the enactment of such legislation as will best secure the
rehabilitation of the American merchant marine, and we protest
against the passage by Congress of a free ship bill, as calculated to
work injustice to labor by lessening the wages of those engaged in
preparing materials as well as those directly employed in our ship
yards. We demand appropriations for the early rebuilding of our
navy; for the construction of coast fortifications and modern
ordnance and other approved modern means of defence for the
protection of our defenceless harbors and cities; for the payment of
just pensions to our soldiers; for necessary works of national
importance in the improvement of harbors and the channels of
internal, coastwise and foreign commerce; for the encouragement of
the shipping interests of the Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific States, as well
as for the payment of the maturing public debt. This policy will give
employment to our labor, activity to our various industries, increase
the security of our country, promote trade, open new and direct
markets for our produce, and cheapen the cost of transportation. We
affirm this to be far better for our country than the Democratic policy
of loaning the Government’s money without interest to “pet banks.”
The conduct of foreign affairs by the present administration has
been distinguished by its inefficiency and its cowardice. Having
withdrawn from the Senate all pending treaties affected by
Republican administrations for the removal of foreign burdens and
restrictions upon our commerce and for its extension into better
markets, it has neither effected nor proposed any others in their
stead. Professing adherence to the Monroe doctrine, it has seen with
idle complacency the extension of foreign influence in Central
America and of foreign trade everywhere among our neighbors. It
has refused to charter, sanction or encourage any American
organization for constructing the Nicaragua canal, a work of vital
importance to the maintenance of the Monroe doctrine and of our
national influence in Central and South America, and necessary for
the development of trade with our Pacific territory, with South
America and with the islands and further coasts of the Pacific Ocean.
We arraign the present Democratic administration for its weak
and unpatriotic treatment of the fisheries question, and its
pusillanimous surrender of the essential privileges to which our
fishing vessels are entitled in Canadian ports under the treaty of
1818, the reciprocal maritime legislation of 1830, and the comity of
nations, and which Canadian fishing vessels receive in ports of the
United States.
We condemn the policy of the present administration and the
Democratic majority in Congress towards our fisheries as unfriendly
and conspicuously unpatriotic, and as tending to destroy a valuable
national industry and an indispensable resource of defense against a
foreign enemy.
The name of American applies alike to all citizens of the Republic,
and imposes upon all alike the same obligation to obedience to the
laws. At the same time that citizenship is and must be the panoply
and safeguard of him who wears it, and protect him, whether high or
low, rich or poor, in all his civil rights, it should and must afford him
protection at home and follow and protect him abroad in whatever
land he may be on a lawful errand.
The men who abandoned the Republican party in 1884 and
continue to adhere to the Democratic party have deserted not only
the cause of honest government, of sound finance, of freedom and
purity of the ballot, but especially have deserted the cause of reform
in the civil service. We will not fail to keep our pledges because they
have broken theirs or because their candidate has broken his. We
therefore repeat our declaration of 1884, to wit: “The reform of the
Civil Service, auspiciously begun under the Republican
administration should be completed by the further extension of the
reform system already established by law to all grades of the service
to which it is applicable. The spirit and purpose of the reform should
be observed in all executive appointments, and all laws at variance
with the object of existing reform legislation should be repealed, to
the end that the dangers to free institutions which lurk in the power
of official patronage may be wisely and effectively avoided.”
The gratitude of the nation to the defenders of the Union cannot be
measured by laws. The legislation of Congress should conform to the
pledge made by a loyal people, and be so enlarged and extended as to
provide against the possibility that any man who honorably wore the
Federal uniform shall become an inmate of an almshouse, or
dependent upon private charity. In the presence of an overflowing
treasury it would be a public scandal to do less for those whose
valorous service preserved the Government. We denounce the hostile
spirit shown by President Cleveland in his numerous vetoes of
measures for pension relief, and the action of the Democratic House
of Representatives in refusing even a consideration of general
pension legislation.
In support of the principles herewith enunciated we invite the co-
operation of patriotic men of all parties, and especially of all
workingmen, whose prosperity is seriously threatened by the free
trade policy of the present administration.
On motion of Hon. Chas. A. Boutelle of Maine, the following was
also adopted:
“The first concern of all good government is the virtue and sobriety
of the people and the purity of the home. The Republican party
cordially sympathizes with all wise and well-directed efforts for the
promotion of temperance and morality.”
COMPARISON OF PLATFORM PLANKS ON
GREAT POLITICAL QUESTIONS.
DEMOCRATIC. REPUBLICAN.
DEMOCRATIC. REPUBLICAN.
DEMOCRATIC. REPUBLICAN.
DEMOCRATIC. REPUBLICAN.
1876—The false issue with which 1876—The public school system of the
they [the Republicans] would several States is the bulwark of the
enkindle sectarian strife in respect to American Republic, and with a view to
the public schools, of which the its security and permanence we
establishment and support belong recommend an Amendment to the
exclusively to the several States, and Constitution of the United States,
which the Democratic party has forbidding the application of any public
cherished from their foundation, and funds or property for the benefit of any
is resolved to maintain without schools or institutions under sectarian
prejudice or preference for any class, control.
sect, or creed, and without largesses [Plank 4.
from the Treasury to any.
1880—* * * Common Schools 1880—The work of popular education
fostered and protected. is one left to the care of the several
[Plank 2. States, but it is the duty of the National
Government to aid that work to the
extent of its constitutional ability. The
intelligence of the nation is but the
aggregate of the intelligence in the
several States, and the destiny of the
Nation must be guided, not by the
genius of any one State, but by the
average genius of all.
[Plank 3.
Duty to Union Soldiers and Sailors.
DEMOCRATIC. REPUBLICAN.