Steroid Use After Cardiac Arrest Is Associated With Favourable Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Steroid Use After Cardiac Arrest Is Associated With Favourable Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Steroid Use After Cardiac Arrest Is Associated With Favourable Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: The effect of steroid use on outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest (CA)
remains controversial. We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate whether steroid
use after CA increased the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and survival to dis-
charge in patients with CA.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were
searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on the effect of
steroid use on outcomes in adults with CA. The outcomes were ROSC and survival to discharge.
Results: Seven studies (four RCTs and three observational studies) were included. Pooled
analysis suggested that steroid use was associated with increased ROSC in patients with CA.
Steroid use was significantly associated with survival to discharge, which was a consistent finding
in RCTs and observational studies. Subgroup analysis based on the time of drug administration
(during cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] vs. after CA) showed that steroid use during CPR
and after CA were significantly associated with an increased rate of ROSC and survival to
discharge.
Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that steroid use after CA could increase ROSC and
survival to discharge in patients with CA. However, high-quality and adequately powered RCTs
are warranted.
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits
non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed
as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
2 Journal of International Medical Research
Keywords
Steroids, cardiac arrest, meta-analysis, return of spontaneous circulation, survival, cardiopulmo-
nary resuscitation
Date received: 18 October 2019; accepted: 1 April 2020
they did not report predefined outcomes or used steroids in combination with atropine
meet our inclusion criteria. Finally, seven and epinephrine. Overall, there were 9414
studies were included in our analysis. patients included in the meta-analysis
(3647 patients in the steroid group and
Study characteristics and quality 5767 patients in the non-steroid group).
Tsai et al. 2019 Taiwan Retrospective Nontraumatic Steroid 67.66 y; Steroid 59.19%; Survival to dis- Steroid 5.685.27; Steroid 0.35%; 2004–2011 Steroid use was associated
observational OHCA, IHCA Non-steroid Non-steroid charge, 1-year Non-steroid Non-steroid with better survival to
single centre 67.51 y 59.5% survival 5.725.23 0.4% hospital discharge
Zhang et al. 2015 China mainland RCT Single centre Nontraumatic 65.719.6 y 35% ROSC, Survival to Steroid 9.03; Non- – 2011–2014 Glucocorticoid use during
OHCA, IHCA discharge steroid 9.05 CPR was associated
with ROSC
Niimura et al. 2017 Japan Retrospective OHCA Steroid 51.43 Steroid 62%; Survival to dis- – Steroid 8%; Non- January 2005 and The results demonstrate a
observational 14.17 y; Non- Non-steroid charge, ROSC steroid 1% May 2014 correlation between
single centre steroid 73% hydrocortisone admin-
51.3013.19 y istration and the high
rate of survival to
discharge.
Mentzelopoulos 2013 Greece RCT single centre OHCA, IHCA Steroid 63.2 y; Steroid 63.8%; Survival to dis- – – September 1, Combined vasopressin–
et al. Non-steroid Non-steroid charge, ROSC 2008, to epinephrine and meth-
62.8 y 73.1% October 1, ylprednisolone during
2010 CPR resulted in
improved survival to
hospital discharge
Yang et al. 2002 China mainland RCT, single centre OHCA 26–76 y Steroid 57%; ROSC – – – Combined vasopressin–
IHCA Non-steroid epinephrine and meth-
52% ylprednisolone during
resuscitation improved
ROSC
Mu et al. 2014 China mainland Retrospective Nontraumatic – – ROSC – – October 2004 to Administration of hydro-
observational OHCA July 2005 cortisone during resus-
Single centre citation, particularly
within 6 minutes after
ED arrival, may be
associated with
improved ROSC rate in
OHCA patients
Wei et al. 2001 China mainland RCT, single centre Nontraumatic – – – – Combined vasopressin–
OHCA, IHCA epinephrine and meth-
ylprednisolone during
CPR improved ROSC
RCT, randomized controlled trial; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; OHCA, out of hospital cardiac arrest; IHCA, in hospital cardiac arrest.
6 Journal of International Medical Research
the cohort studies, two studies were rated as an increased rate of ROSC (RR 1.42; 95%
having a total score of >5, indicating a low CI 1.13–1.77, P < 0.0001). One study [12]
risk of bias. Two studies7,16 achieved low reported drug administration during CPR
risk, two studies13,15 achieved medium and five studies7,13–16 reported drug admin-
risk, and one study14 achieve high risk. istration after CPR for the ROSC. Two
studies7,12 reported drug administration
Primary outcome: ROSC during CPR and two studies8,13 reported
drug administration after CPR for the
Six studies7,12–16 examined the association
result of survival to discharge.
between steroid use and ROSC. Among
these six studies, four studies were RCTs
and two were cohort studies. The overall
Secondary outcomes: Survival to
effect size (RR 1.44; 95%CI 1.17–1.76; discharge
P ¼ 0.02) demonstrated a significant associ- Four studies7,8,12,13 reported the association
ation between steroid use and ROSC. between steroid use and the outcome sur-
A subgroup analysis (RCTs vs. cohort stud- vival to discharge. When the four groups
ies) was also conducted. RCTs and cohort were pooled together (Figure 3), the effect
studies both revealed a significant associa- size analysis (RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.16–2.40,
tion between steroid use and ROSC (RCT: P < 0.005) indicated that steroid use was
RR 1.43; 95%CI: 1.10–1.86, P ¼ 0.008; significantly associated with an increased
cohort studies: RR 1.54; 95%CI 1.12– rate of survival to discharge. A subgroup
2.12, P ¼ 0.009). There was no significantly analysis suggested that steroid use was asso-
statistical heterogeneity between the sub- ciated with a significantly increased rate of
groups based on a test of interaction survival to discharge in both the RCTs
(I2 ¼ 0; Figure 2). (RR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.39–6.03, P ¼ 0.005)
A subgroup analysis based on the time of and the observational studies (RR, 1.36;
steroid administration (during CPR vs. 95% CI, 1.21–1.52, P < 0.0001).
after CA) showed that steroid use during Subgroup analysis based on the time of
CPR was significantly associated with an drug administration (during CPR vs after
increased rate of ROSC (RR 1.64; 95% CA) showed that use of steroid during
CI 1.05–2.58, P < 0.005). Steroid use after CPR was significantly associated with
CA was also significantly associated with increased rate of survival to discharge
Liu et al. 7
Figure 2. Forest plot of the pooled effects of steroid use on ROSC in cardiac arrest patients.
df, degrees of freedom; M-H, Mantel–Haenszel; Experimental, steroid group; control, non-steroid group.
Figure 3. Forest plot of the pooled effects of steroid use on survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients.
df, degrees of freedom; M-H, Mantel–Haenszel; Experimental, steroid group; control, non-steroid group.
(RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.33–3.49, P < 0.05), use significant publication bias based on inspec-
of steroid after CA was significantly associ- tion of the funnel plot (Figure 4).
ated with increased rate of survival to dis-
charge (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.23–1.48,
P < 0.05). GRADEpro summary of findings
The quality of evidence was assessed for
Publication bias ROSC and survival to discharge and there
For the meta-analysis of the effect of ste- was no difference in the risk of bias for
roid use on ROSC, there was no evidence of these parameters.
8 Journal of International Medical Research
Figure 4. a: Funnel plot of the effects of steroid use on ROSC in cardiac arrest patients. b: Funnel plot of
the effects of steroid on survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients.
and thus ameliorate post-resuscitation myo- additional subgroup analyses were not pos-
cardial dysfunction.32 CA also leads to cere- sible. Fourth, the largest study included in
bral injury,33 and studies have shown that the present analysis was Tsai et al.,8 which
steroids could reduce cerebral injury.34 enrolled more patients than the all remain-
Steroids modulate the immune system, ing studies combined. However, the prima-
and they could theoretically affect the ry outcome of the present analysis did not
post-CA inflammatory response. include that study. This may have led to
In this study on the effects of steroid use bias in the primary outcome.
on ROSC in CA patients, the overall het-
erogeneity was low, but the subgroup het-
Conclusion
erogeneity (RCTs vs. cohort studies) was
high. The effect of steroid use on survival Current evidence indicates that steroid use
to discharge was investigated in this meta- increases the rate of ROSC and survival to
analysis, and the total heterogeneity was discharge in patients with CA. Steroid use
high, but the subgroup heterogeneity may remain an acceptable option for
(RCTs vs. cohort studies) was low. The dif- patients with CA; however, high-quality
ference between RCTs and cohort studies and adequately powered RCTs are
may explain the heterogeneity. Thus, it is warranted.
critical to improve the methodological qual-
ity of observational studies in future Declaration of conflicting interest
research. Among the included studies, the The authors declare that there is no conflict of
combination of steroids with different interest.
drugs and the drug dose may lead to sub-
stantial clinical heterogeneity. Additionally, Funding
further studies are required to uncover
This research received no specific grant from any
potential mechanisms of steroids in CA.
funding agency in the public, commercial, or
However, more well-designed, randomized,
not-for-profit sectors.
double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are
required.
ORCID iD
Chunsheng Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-
Limitations 3161-4457
First, our analysis did not show an associ-
ation between the steroid dose and clinical References
outcomes. A high degree of clinical hetero- 1. Soar J, Maconochie I, Wyckoff MH, et al.
geneity may weaken the stability of the con- 2019 International Consensus on
clusions. Harmful effects of steroid use were Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
not considered in our study, which may Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science
influence the clinical outcomes. Second, With Treatment Recommendations:
we included RCTs and observational stud- Summary From the Basic Life Support;
Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life
ies. Observational studies have a high risk
Support; Neonatal Life Support;
of selection bias and confounding by indi-
Education, Implementation, and Teams;
cation. Third, there are many types of ste- and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation
roids that are administered at various 2019; 140: e826–e880.
dosages. These may lead to the heterogene- 2. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, et al.
ity in a meta-analysis, but the included Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital
studies did not report these data, and cardiac arrest: A systematic review and
10 Journal of International Medical Research