Hebron Research
Hebron Research
Science Education
Research
EDITORS
Prof. Dr. İlbilge DÖKME
Doç. Dr. Semra BENZER
© Copyright 2020
Printing, broadcasting and sales rights of this book are reserved to Akademisyen Publishing House Inc.
All or parts of this book may not be reproduced, printed or distributed by any means mechanical, ele-
ctronic, photocopying, magnetic paper and/or other methods without prior written permission of the
publisher. Tables, figures and graphics cannot be used for commercial purposes without permission.
This book is sold with banderol of Republic of Turkey Ministry of Culture.
ISBN
978-625-710-641-2
Book Title
Special Topics In Science Education Research
Editors
Prof. Dr. İlbilge DÖKME
Doç. Dr. Semra BENZER
Publishing Coordinator
Yasin DİLMEN
Bisac Code
EDU037000
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION
Akademisyen Kitabevi A.Ş.
Halk Sokak 5 / A
Yenişehir / Ankara
Tel: 0312 431 16 33
[email protected]
www.akademisyen.com
PREFACE
- vi -
CHAPTER 7
FACTORS AFFECTING THE MOTIVATION
LEVELS OF SECONDARY SCHOOL
STUDENTS FOR SCIENCE LEARNING
Semra BENZER1
Yasemin SARIŞIK2
Hilal KOÇAN3
1. INTRUDUCTION
A vision of science and technology course is regardless of their individual dif-
ferences all students are trained as science and technology literate. Science and
technology literacy will be explained with a general definition; It is a combination
of science-related skills, attitudes, values, understandings and knowledge required
for individuals to develop research-inquiry, critical thinking, problem-solving and
decision-making skills, life time learning and maintain a sense of curiosity about
their environment and the world (TTKB, 2006). Teachers should not only mo-
tivate their students according to their students’ interests, but also help science
literacy (Talib, Luan, Azhar & Abdullah, 2009). Motivation is known as an im-
portant factor that affects students’ creativity, learning styles and academic success
(Kuyper, Van der Werf & Lubbers, 2000). Motivation is a driving force for students
to succeed, work hard and learn (Martin, 2001). Motivation is a force to satisfy a
need, and this force refers to the internal factors that activate the individual and
external factors that encourage the individuals to behave (Walterman, 2005).
It is known that successful teachers motivate their students at certain levels.
However, arousal that causes anxiety, can cause decrease in performance (Öncü,
1
Assoc.Prof.Dr. Gazi University, Education Faculty, Ankara, Türkiye, [email protected]
ORCID: (0000-0002-8548-8994)
2
Teacher, Ministry of Education, Türkiye, [email protected]
ORCID: (0000-0001-9514-2017)
3
Teacher, Ministry of Education, Türkiye, [email protected]
ORCID: (0000-0001-6723-7254)
- 117 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
2002). The enthusiastic, empathetic behavior of the teacher affects students’ moti-
vation (Bacanlı, 2001). Although the effects of motivation on learning and behav-
ior are known, the knowledge about how to use it and what it means is unknown
(Dede, 2003).
Motivation is accepted as an important factor contributing to students’ school
success (Pinttrich, 2003). It is stated that motivation has an important role in
science education and achievement, development of conceptual change, critical
thinking and scientific process skills (Garcia & Pintrich, 1992; Pintrich, Smith,
Garcia, & McKeachie, 1993; Tuan, Chin & Shieh 2005). Students ‘ interests for
subjects, their perceptions of duty and their success in scientific interpretations
are affected by their motivation (Tuan, Chin & Shieh, 2005).
Motivation is one of the most important factors affects learning and success.
Because highly motivated students tend to show more effort and determination
in classroom activities and assignments than low motivated students (Wolters &
Rosenthal, 2000). Motivation can affect the performance of learning new things,
previously learned skills, strategies and behaviors. Motivation affects not only
how and what students learn, but also the frequency and duration of learning
activities (Schunk, 1991).
The students’ learning goal is also important for construction of their science
knowledge, based on learning value and learning strategies (Tuan, Chin & Shieh,
2005). One of the factors that affect students’ achievement is motivation (Guay,
Chanal, Ratelle, Marsh, Laroseve Boivin, 2010). Highly motivated students’ learn-
ing is more efficient (Senemoğlu, 2007). It tends to deal with motivated individu-
als’ learning activities (Zimmerman, 2000). Motivation has a complex nature that
is influenced by student motivation, curriculum, learning - teaching methods,
personal characteristics of teachers and students (Lee & Brophy, 1996).
Students ‘ interest in the subjects and their grades in the classroom, students’
perceptions of duty, their success and failure in acquiring scientific knowledge,
the general goals and orientations and achievements of meaning the science are
some of the factors that affect their motivation base on scientific researches (Tuan,
Chin & Sheh, 2005).
A lot of research has been done to determine the motivation levels of prima-
ry school students for learning science (Bozanoğlu, 2004; Dalgety, Coll & Jones,
2003; Tuan, Chin & Shieh, 2005; Yenice, Saydam, & Telli, 2012). When the local
literature is searched; levels of elementary school students from science lesson
according to demographic characteristics (Aydın, 2007), developing the motiva-
tion scale for learning science (Dede & Yaman, 2008; Yılmaz & Çavaş, 2007), the
effect of grade level and gender on primary school students’ motivation for sci-
- 118 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
ence learning (Güvercin, 2008), the effects of variables such as gender, classroom
and parental education on the motivation levels of primary school students for
learning science (Uzun & Keleş, 2010), relationship between 6th and 7th grade stu-
dents’ attitudes and motivations towards science (Azizoğlu & Çetin, 2008) and the
relationship between teaching profession and motivation resources (Yazıcı, 2009)
can be found.
In this study, it is aimed to determine the motivation levels of middle school
students towards learning science. Does the motivation of primary school students
(5, 6, 7, 8th grade) for learning science differ according to the following parameters?
a) Gender
b) Class levels
c) Father’s educational status
d) Father’s profession status
e) Mother ‘s profession status
f) Mother’s education status
2.METHOD
- 119 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
- 120 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
- 121 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
In this study; at the grade level of 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade students, it was
determined that the motivation points were close to each other, and the lowest
motivation point average was the 6th grade students when the average of motiva-
tion points for learning science was examined (Table 5). It was determined that
the motivation levels of the 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade students in this study did not
differ significantly between the grade levels (Table 6).
It was determined that the students’ highest motivation levels for learning sci-
ence were the workers with the highest father profession and the lowest average
score was self-employed when the data obtained in the study were examined (Ta-
ble 7). In the study, it was not determined that the science motivation scores of
the students did not differ according to the father’s professional status (Table 8).
- 122 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
In the study, it was determined that the students’ highest level of science mo-
tivation for learning science was in individuals with high school graduate father
education status (Table 9). It was found that the science motivation levels of the
students did not differ according to the education level of the father when the data
obtained in the study were examined (Table 10).
- 123 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
In the research, it was determined that the mother profession group of the
students who had the lowest level of science motivation for learning science was
the housewife (Table 11). It was found that the science motivation levels of the
students did not differ statistically according to the status of the mother when the
data obtained in the study were examined (Table 12).
In the research, it was determined that the highest level of science motivation
for learning science was among individuals whose mother education level was
high school graduates (Table 13). It was determined that the science motivation
levels of the students did not differ statistically according to the education level of
the mother when the data obtained in the study were examined (Table 14).
- 124 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
In the research, it was determined that the highest level of science motivation
for learning science was among the individuals with the highest income group
(Table 15). It was found that there was no statistically significant difference be-
tween the students’ science motivation levels towards learning science when the
data obtained in the study were examined (Table 16).
- 125 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
level and family income status (Table 3-16). According to the data obtained in
the research; It was stated that the motivation levels of students for learning sci-
ence were high (Table 3). In many studies, it has been stated that students have
high level of motivation for learning science (Glynn, Taasoobshirazi & Brickman,
2009; Yenice, Saydam, & Telli, 2012).
In this study, it is seen that there is no significant difference between the moti-
vation levels of male and female students. Different studies also show that gender
is independent of students’ level of science motivation (Çetin & Kırbulut 2006; Ya-
man & Dede, 2007; Güvercin, 2008; Zeyer & Wolf, 2009 Yenice, Saydam, & Telli,
2012). In 7th grade students, there was a significant difference in motivation levels
for learning science in favor of women (Demir, Kılınç, & Doğan, 2012).
In the case of father education, it was determined that the motivation of stu-
dents towards learning science had a significant difference only in motivation for
performance (Demir, Kılınç, & Doğan, 2012). In terms of the mother education
status variable, it was determined that there was no significant difference between
students’ motivation to learn science (Demir, Kılınç, & Doğan, 2012).
In the case of monthly income, it is stated that there is a significant difference
in motivation for science learning, motivation for collaborative work and motiva-
tion for participation (Demir, Kılınç, & Doğan, 2012).
In the study, it was determined that the motivation levels of students for learn-
ing science did not differ significantly from the grade level (Table 6). Yenice, Say-
dam, & Telli (2012) report that motivation levels for learning science differ in
terms of grade levels. In the literature, it was determined that the level of stu-
dent motivation decreased as the grade level increased (Aydın, 2007; Güvercin,
2008). Tseng, Tuan & Chin (2009) states that high motivation students have high
achievements. It is reported that as the grade level increases, their success increas-
es with motivation (Tseng, Tuan & Chin, 2009).
It was determined that the motivation levels for learning science did not dif-
fer significantly according to the status of the mother’s profession and education,
father’s education and education, and family income (Table 8,10,12,14 and 15).
Miquelon (2007) determined that the motivation levels of secondary school stu-
dents for learning science did not differ significantly according to parental educa-
tion, parental profession and family income.
Demir, Kılınç, & Doğan, (2012), in the case of father education, it was deter-
mined that students’ motivation for learning science had a significant difference
only in motivation for performance. In terms of the mother education status vari-
able, it was determined that there was no significant difference between students’
- 126 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
motivation to learn science (Demir, Kılınç, & Doğan, 2012). In the case of month-
ly income, it is stated that there is a significant difference in motivation for sci-
ence learning, motivation for collaborative work and motivation for participation
(Demir, Kılınç, & Doğan, 2012).
Lavigne, Vallerand & Miquelon (2007) stated that the support of science teach-
ers positively affects students’ self-management and self-efficacy perceptions; It
stipulates that there is a direct relationship between the perception of competence
and intention to pursue science education, and that the high level of competence
is to maintain the high level of intentions. Talib, Luan, Azhar, & Abdullah (2009)
stated that the choice of strategies suitable for science learning, having certain
skills, and the interaction between teachers and peers positively affect the moti-
vation to learn, as a result of the research in which students define the underlying
conditions of their motivation for learning science.
The students participating in the research stated that they wanted more de-
tailed information while explaining the subject. In addition, the students stated
that they were undecided in lending their books and lecture notes about science
to their classmates and in group studies, and in items that reveal their status of
caring about their friends’ opinions. The students stated that they wanted to get
the highest grade in science lesson exams, and they had close positive results in
their class discussions to reveal the best ideas and choose their friends to work
while doing group activities. Success, recognition and praise from their teacher
are among the motivating factors. Yajima, Sato & Arai (1996) revealed that there is
a causal relationship between academic achievement and motivation for learning
science as a result of the study in which they examined the relationship between
motivation for learning science and factors affecting academic success.
Motivation self-efficacy, focus on task, effort and control (Garcia, 1995); It was
determined as a result of the researches that it was related with variables such as
gender age, own library, parental education level, and socio-economic level of the
family (Katrancı, 2015; Smith, 1996; Yıldız & Kaman, 2016).
REFERENCES
Aydın, B. (2007). Priority of internel and external motivation at science lesson. Unpublished Master
Thesis, Yeditepe University. Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul.
Azizoğlu, N., & Çetin, G. (2008). Six and Seventh Grade Students’ Learning Styles, Attitudes Towar-
ds Science and Motivations. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1), 171-182.
Bacanlı, H. (2001). Gelişim ve öğrenme. Ankara: Nobel yayınları.
Bozanoğlu, İ. (2004). Academic Motivation Scale: Development, Reliability, Validity. Ankara Uni-
versity, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences. 37 (2), 83-98.
Çetin, A., & Kırbulut, Z. D. (2006). Kimyaya yönelik bir motivasyon ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve lise
öğrencilerinin kimyaya yönelik motivasyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. VII. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve
- 127 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
- 128 -
Special Topics in Science Education Research
- 129 -