CV Quality Discussion: R. Bozzi, M. Battistin A. Andersen D. Leliukh A. Mejica Z. Yettou
CV Quality Discussion: R. Bozzi, M. Battistin A. Andersen D. Leliukh A. Mejica Z. Yettou
Present:
R. Bozzi,
M. Battistin
A. Andersen
D. Leliukh
A. Mejica
Z. Yettou
Meeting Agenda
1 EDMS structure
2 Naming convention
3 List of documents required from the supplier
4 EDMS & records location
5 EDMS structure
Critical topic:
EDMS structure
List of documents required from the supplier which need to be uploaded to EDMS
EDMS structure
Topic Question/concern Response Status Who By when
Naming convention
Action ref Actions progress Status Who By when
GEM Proposal Will the naming convention Open Quality, GEM &
be followed by the PL
contractors?
EDMS document Who shall upload the Open Quality, GEM &
Owner documents to EDMS? PL
Cern or supplier?
As Built Part 2 Which documents need to Open Quality, GEM &
be printed PL
APPENDIX
Project
Tendring
P&ID CMMS data
documents
Manufacturers
Safety_File maintenance Acceptance
prescriptions
Equipment and
Cost Planning control parameters Drawings
settings
Project phase
GEM Questions and Quality responses
ZY Suggestion: We can keep them for the moment. Input needed from other sections
ZY: To be discussed
Project phase :
Contract execution Document
As Bulit Part 1
As Built Part 2
ZY: I think we need to focus on the high priority topics as described above and then try to
find a compromise for the small project
12. Should each LHC point have a separated context or the division PS/SPS/LHC is
enough?
13. Owner of the EDMS document to be changed in case created by contractor. Massive
upload from our side is possible in case an excel file with a documentation list is provided.