Educ 205 Reviewer Finals
Educ 205 Reviewer Finals
CATEGORIES OF CURRICULUM CHANGE b. Teachers with less than two (2) years teaching
Mc Neii in 1990 categorized curriculum change as experience shall be required to prepare DLPs which shall
follows:There are five categories of curriculum change. include the following:
The five categories of curriculum change are the • Objectives;
following: • Subject Matter;
1. Substitution • Procedure;
2. Alteration • Assessment; and
3. Restructuring • Assignment.
4. Perturbations c. Teachers may make modification of/or deviation from
5. Value orientation the TGs/TMs whenever necessary to suit the learners’
ability provided that the learning standards and
competencies are met. They are encouraged to enhance
the TGs to provide activities that will develop higher
thinking skills.
d. DLPs/DLLs shall be written in the language of the REMEMBER
TGs/TMs. Grade 1 teachers need not translate them to the • recognizing (identifying)
Mother Tongue (MT). However, the use of MT as medium • recalling (retrieving)
of instruction must be strictly followed. UNDERSTAND
• interpreting (clarifying, paraphrasing,
STARTING THE CLASS RIGHT: LAYING DOWN representing, translating)
THE CURRICULUM PLAN • exemplifying (illustrating, instantiating)
First, it’s best to view your lesson objectives as goals for • classifying (categorizing, subsuming)
your class and students. One of the most popular goal- • summarizing (abstracting, generalizing)
setting strategies is the ―SMART‖ criteria, which ensures
• inferring (concluding, extrapolating,
goals are focused. In the context of lesson planning, you interpolating, predicting)
can use the SMART criteria to determine your lesson
• comparing (contrasting, mapping, matching)
objectives.
• explaining (constructing models)
• Is the objective specific?
APPLY
• Is the objective measurable?
• executing (carrying out)
• Is the objective attainable by all students?
• implementing (using)
• Is the objective relevant to your class and ANALYZE
students?
• differentiating (discriminating, distinguishing,
• Is the objective time-based to align with your focusing, selecting)
syllabus?
• organizing (finding, coherence, integrating,
outlining, parsing, structuring)
THE MAIN PARTS OF A LESSON PLAN
• attributing (deconstructing)
1. Intended Learning Objectives
EVALUATE
2. Subject Matter
3. Procedure or Strategies of Teaching • checking (coordinating, detecting, monitoring,
4. Assessment of Learning Outcomes testing)
5. Assignment or Agreement • critiquing (judging)
CREATE
1. Learning outcomes can be defined as the particular • generating (hypothesizing)
knowledge, skills, and abilities that an instructor intends • planning (designing)
for students to learn or develop. Outcomes are more • producing (construct)
specific than learning goals, which take a 10,000-foot
view of what an instructor desires for students to gain In writing objectives or intended learning outcomes, it is
from a course. Bloom’s Taxonomy has revisited by his always recommended that more of the higher order
own student Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl. thinking skills (HOTS) should be developed and less of
the low level thinking skills (LOTS) for learners. The low
level categories will develop LOTS and thinking skills
progress as the categories move higher.