climate

Review
Net Zero Dairy Farming—Advancing Climate Goals with Big
Data and Artificial Intelligence
Suresh Neethirajan

Faculty of Agriculture and Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 1W5, Canada;
[email protected]

Abstract: This paper explores the transformative potential of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI)
in propelling the dairy industry toward net zero emissions, a critical objective in the global fight
against climate change. Employing the Canadian dairy sector as a case study, the study extrapolates
its findings to demonstrate the global applicability of these technologies in enhancing environmental
sustainability across the agricultural spectrum. We begin by delineating the environmental challenges
confronting the dairy industry worldwide, with an emphasis on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions,
including methane from enteric fermentation and nitrous oxide from manure management. The press-
ing need for innovative approaches in light of the accelerating climate crisis forms the crux of our
argument. Our analysis delves into the role of Big Data and AI in revolutionizing emission man-
agement in dairy farming. This includes applications in optimizing feed efficiency, refining manure
management, and improving energy utilization. Technological solutions such as predictive analytics
for feed optimization, AI in herd health management, and sensor networks for real-time monitoring
are thoroughly examined. Crucially, the paper addresses the wider implications of integrating these
technologies in dairy farming. We discuss the development of benchmarking standards for emissions,
the importance of data privacy, and the essential role of policy in promoting sustainable practices.
These aspects are vital in supporting the adoption of technology, ensuring ethical use, and aligning
with international climate commitments. Concluding, our comprehensive study not only suggests a
pathway for the dairy industry towards environmental sustainability but also provides insights into
the role of digital technologies in broader agricultural practices, aligning with global environmental
sustainability efforts.
Citation: Neethirajan, S. Net Zero
Dairy Farming—Advancing Climate
Keywords: climate change; net zero emissions; dairy farming; Big Data; Artificial Intelligence (AI);
Goals with Big Data and Artificial
Intelligence. Climate 2024, 12, 15.
greenhouse gas emissions; sustainable agriculture; technological innovation; policy framework;
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12020015 environmental sustainability

Academic Editors: Cheng Li,

Fei Zhang, Mou Leong Tan and Kwok
Pan Chun
1. Climate Change and the Drive for Net Zero Emissions
Received: 16 November 2023 1.1. Global Climate Crisis and its Impacts
Revised: 22 January 2024
The global climate crisis, driven by anthropogenic activities, has precipitated a series of
Accepted: 22 January 2024
environmental upheavals with dire consequences. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Published: 25 January 2024
Change (IPCC) reports indicate a substantial increase in global temperatures, attributable
to the amplified concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as carbon dioxide (CO2 ),
methane (CH4 ), and nitrous oxide (N2 O) in the atmosphere [1,2]. The primary sources
Copyright: © 2024 by the author.
of these emissions include fossil fuel combustion, deforestation, and industrial processes.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. The resulting global warming is not a distant threat but a present reality, manifesting
This article is an open access article in melting polar ice caps, rising sea levels, and increases in the frequency and severity
distributed under the terms and of extreme weather events. These environmental changes have a cascading effect on
conditions of the Creative Commons ecosystems and biodiversity. The alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// disrupt natural habitats, leading to species migration and extinction [3]. Additionally, the
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ acidification of oceans due to increased CO2 levels poses a significant threat to marine
4.0/). life [4]. For humanity, these changes entail dire consequences, ranging from health risks due

Climate 2024, 12, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12020015 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/climate

Climate 2024, 12, 15 2 of 22

to heatwaves and pollution to economic losses in agriculture, fisheries, and other sectors
crucial for livelihoods.

1.2. The Concept and Importance of Achieving Net Zero Emissions

Net zero emissions represent a state where the amount of GHGs emitted into the
atmosphere is balanced by an equivalent amount removed [5]. Achieving this balance is
crucial for stabilizing global temperatures. The concept hinges on the principle of carbon
neutrality, where every ton of anthropogenic GHG emitted is counterbalanced by a ton
removed or sequestered from the atmosphere [6].
Achieving net zero emissions necessitates a twofold strategy: reducing the existing
emissions and enhancing carbon sinks. The former involves transitioning to renewable en-
ergy sources, boosting energy efficiency, and altering land use practices [7]. Simultaneously,
enhancing natural carbon sinks like forests and oceans, alongside technological solutions
such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), is imperative. CCS, for instance, involves captur-
ing CO2 emissions at their source (like power plants) and sequestering them underground
or using them in various applications [8]. This balance is not just an environmental impera-
tive but also a socio-economic necessity. The transition to a low-carbon economy promises
innovation, job creation, and energy security, fostering sustainable development [9]. How-
ever, achieving net zero is a monumental task that requires concerted global action and
significant investment in technology and infrastructure.

1.3. The Role of International Commitments in Climate Change Mitigation

International commitments are pivotal in the fight against climate change. The Paris
Agreement, a landmark international treaty adopted in 2015, exemplifies global efforts to
combat climate change [10]. The agreement’s central aim is to limit global warming to
well below 2 degrees Celsius, preferably to 1.5 degrees Celsius, compared to pre-industrial
levels [11]. This goal is grounded in scientific evidence suggesting that surpassing this
threshold could lead to catastrophic climate impacts.
Under the Paris Agreement, countries have committed to nationally determined
contributions (NDCs), which are plans to outline each country’s efforts to reduce national
emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. The effectiveness of the Paris
Agreement lies in its structure, which allows for periodic review and enhancement of these
NDCs, fostering a progressive increase in global ambition. However, the challenge extends
beyond mere commitment. The implementation of these NDCs requires a radical overhaul
of national policies and economies. It demands a shift from fossil fuel dependence to
renewable energy sources, a transformation in agricultural and industrial practices, and
significant changes in consumption patterns. Furthermore, international cooperation is
vital in this endeavor. Developed countries are expected to provide financial and technical
support to developing nations, acknowledging the principle of common but differentiated
responsibilities. This support is crucial as developing countries often lack the resources to
implement substantial climate action.
The role of international commitments extends to fostering a global culture of sus-
tainability. By setting clear targets and establishing a framework for collaboration, these
commitments provide a roadmap for nations to collectively address the climate crisis. They
also send a strong signal to businesses and investors, shifting financial flows towards more
sustainable projects and technologies.
The drive for net zero emissions is not just an environmental goal but a comprehensive
strategy for sustainable development. It requires a paradigm shift in how economies operate
and societies function [12]. Achieving net zero emissions is pivotal in mitigating the global
climate crisis, a task that demands unwavering commitment, innovative solutions, and
robust international cooperation. As we stand at the crossroads of a climatic emergency, the
path we choose today will determine the future of our planet and the generations to come.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 3 of 22

2. Environmental Footprint of the Canadian Dairy Industry

The Canadian dairy industry, a significant contributor to the national economy, also
plays a pivotal role in the environmental landscape, particularly concerning greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions. The sector’s environmental footprint is predominantly characterized by
emissions arising from enteric fermentation in dairy cattle and manure management [13,14].
These emissions are critical factors in the broader context of climate change and environmental
sustainability.

2.1. The Economic and Environmental Significance of Dairy Farming in Canada

The dairy sector in Canada is a substantial segment of the nation’s agricultural frame-
work, contributing to both the economy and food security. According to Agriculture and
Agri-Food Canada, the industry provides significant economic benefits, encompassing
over 9000 dairy farms and a considerable contribution to the national GDP [15,16]. This
economic importance, however, is juxtaposed against the sector’s environmental impacts,
chiefly its contribution to GHG emissions.
The environmental footprint of dairy farming extends beyond GHG emissions. It
includes land use for feed production, water consumption, and the impact on biodiver-
sity [17–19]. Nevertheless, the emission of GHGs remains the most pressing environmental
issue associated with dairy farming, directly influencing climate change.

2.2. Main Sources of GHG Emissions in Dairy Farming: Enteric Fermentation and
Manure Management
2.2.1. Enteric Fermentation
Enteric fermentation is a natural digestive process in ruminants, where microbes in the
stomach break down food, producing methane (CH4 ) as a byproduct [20,21]. This methane,
a potent greenhouse gas, is then released into the atmosphere, predominantly through
belching. The global warming potential of methane is approximately 28 times greater than
that of CO2 over a 100-year period, as reported by the IPCC [22–24]. In the context of the
Canadian dairy industry, enteric fermentation represents a significant portion of its GHG
emissions. Strategies to mitigate these emissions include dietary modifications to reduce
fermentable substrates in the rumen and the use of feed additives like lipids or nitrates that
can decrease methanogenesis [25,26].

2.2.2. Manure Management

The management of manure on dairy farms is another major source of GHG emissions,
particularly methane and nitrous oxide (N2 O) [27]. Methane emissions occur during the
storage and handling of manure under anaerobic conditions. Nitrous oxide, with a global
warming potential 265 times that of CO2 , is emitted primarily during the storage and
application of manure to fields [28,29]. N2 O emissions are linked to the nitrification and
denitrification processes in soil, exacerbated by the application of nitrogen-rich manure.
The mitigation of these emissions can be achieved through improved manure management
practices, such as the adoption of aerobic composting techniques, and the utilization of
anaerobic digesters that convert manure into biogas, a renewable energy source [30].

2.2.3. Synthetic Fertilizers

The use of synthetic fertilizers in feed crop production for dairy cattle is a notable
source of N2 O emissions. When applied to soil, these fertilizers undergo microbial transfor-
mations, leading to N2 O release. The extent of these emissions is influenced by factors such
as soil type, climate, and application method. Precision agriculture techniques, which opti-
mize fertilizer application based on soil needs and environmental conditions, are effective
in reducing N2 O emissions from synthetic fertilizers.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 4 of 22

2.2.4. Fossil Fuel Use

Dairy farming operations, including machinery for fieldwork, transportation, and
dairy processing, contribute to CO2 emissions through the combustion of fossil fuels [31,32].
The energy-intensive nature of these activities necessitates a shift towards more sustainable
energy sources and the adoption of energy-efficient technologies.

2.3. Environmental Impact of Dairy Farming Emissions

The environmental impact of emissions from dairy farming is multifaceted. Methane
and nitrous oxide, due to their high global warming potentials, significantly contribute
to the greenhouse effect and climate change. These emissions are a concern not only for
their contribution to global warming but also for their role in altering weather patterns,
impacting ecosystems and biodiversity. Furthermore, the emission of N2 O presents an
additional environmental challenge due to its role in ozone layer depletion [33,34]. This
aspect underscores the need for effective strategies to manage N2 O emissions from both
manure and fertilizer applications.
In addressing these emissions, the dairy industry faces several challenges. Technologi-
cal barriers include the development and implementation of effective mitigation strategies
that are economically viable and scalable [35]. Economic constraints, particularly the cost of
adopting new technologies and practices, pose significant hurdles for many dairy farmers.
Additionally, policy and regulatory challenges can impact the pace and extent of emission
reduction efforts.
In the realm of dairy farming, quantifying and understanding emissions is vital for
crafting sustainable practices. This sector, integral to global agriculture, faces the dual chal-
lenge of maintaining productivity while mitigating its environmental footprint [36]. Key
emission sources include enteric fermentation, manure management, synthetic fertilizers,
and fossil fuel use. Each of these sources contributes uniquely to the overall environmental
impact of dairy farming.
The environmental footprint of dairy farming, notably its GHG emissions, poses
significant challenges to sustainability goals. Enteric fermentation and manure management
are the main contributors to these emissions, necessitating targeted mitigation strategies.
The Canadian dairy industry’s approach to addressing its environmental impact involves a
multifaceted strategy, incorporating technological innovations, farm management practices,
and policy interventions.
Technological innovations, such as precision agriculture, can optimize feed efficiency
and manure management, thereby reducing emissions. Precision agriculture utilizes data-
driven insights to tailor feed formulations and application rates of manure, minimizing
excess nutrient application and optimizing digestion processes [37]. In addition to tech-
nological solutions, farm management practices play a crucial role. Strategies such as
altering feed composition to reduce enteric fermentation, improving manure storage and
treatment facilities, and adopting nutrient management plans are integral to reducing the
dairy industry’s environmental footprint.
Policy interventions and incentives are also critical. Regulations and guidelines
that promote sustainable practices, alongside financial incentives for farmers who adopt
emission-reducing technologies, can significantly contribute to mitigating the environmen-
tal impact of dairy farming. The environmental footprint of the Canadian dairy industry,
particularly its contribution to GHG emissions, is a complex issue that requires a holistic
approach. The mitigation of emissions from enteric fermentation and manure management
necessitates a combination of technological innovations, effective farm management prac-
tices, and supportive policy frameworks. As the dairy industry continues to evolve, the
integration of these strategies will be key in ensuring its sustainability and alignment with
broader environmental objectives.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 5 of 22

3. Sustainability Challenges and Industry Efforts in Dairy Farming

The dairy industry, a vital component of global agriculture, faces significant sustain-
ability challenges, particularly in mitigating its environmental impact. Central to these
challenges are the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy farms, primarily methane
emissions from enteric fermentation, the environmental implications of manure manage-
ment, and energy use in dairy processing. These factors significantly contribute to climate
change, necessitating urgent and innovative responses from the industry.

3.1. Addressing Methane Emissions from Enteric Fermentation

The dairy industry has been exploring various strategies to mitigate these emissions.
One approach is dietary manipulation, where the feed composition is adjusted to reduce
fermentable substrates in the rumen that contribute to methane production. This includes
incorporating lipids, nitrates, or certain enzymes that can decrease methanogenesis. An-
other method is the use of feed additives like 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP), which directly
inhibits the enzyme (methyl coenzyme M reductase) responsible for methane production
in the rumen [38,39].

3.2. Innovations in Manure Management

Innovative manure management practices are being developed to mitigate these
emissions. These include the adoption of aerobic composting techniques, which reduce
methane production by promoting aerobic conditions. Anaerobic digesters are another
solution, converting manure into biogas, a renewable energy source, while significantly
reducing methane emissions [40]. Additionally, precision agriculture tools are being utilized
to optimize the application rates of manure, ensuring nutrients are used efficiently and
minimizing excess nitrogen application, which contributes to nitrous oxide emissions.

3.3. Energy Use in Dairy Processing and its Environmental Implications

Dairy processing, encompassing pasteurizing, homogenizing, and packaging milk, is
an energy-intensive process. The reliance on fossil fuels in dairy processing contributes
significantly to GHG emissions [41,42]. Reducing the energy footprint of dairy processing
is crucial for the overall sustainability of the industry.
Efforts to mitigate energy use in dairy processing include transitioning to renewable
energy sources, such as solar or wind power [43]. Energy efficiency measures, such as the
use of energy-efficient equipment and the optimization of processing operations, are also
being implemented. These measures not only reduce GHG emissions but also decrease
operational costs. Another innovative approach is the recovery and utilization of waste
heat generated during processing. Heat recovery systems can repurpose this waste heat
for other processing steps or for heating purposes within the facility, thereby improving
overall energy efficiency.
Continuous research and development, coupled with industry-wide adoption of
these practices, are essential for achieving substantial reductions in GHG emissions. The
integration of these strategies, supported by policy frameworks and incentives, will be key
in ensuring the dairy industry’s progress towards sustainability. As the industry evolves,
the continuous refinement and implementation of these approaches will play a critical
role in mitigating its environmental footprint and contributing to global efforts to combat
climate change.

4. The Transformative Impact of Big Data and AI in Dairy Farming

The advent of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized dairy farming,
introducing enhanced efficiency, improved sustainability, and innovative management
practices. These technologies address key challenges in dairy farming, such as optimizing
resource usage, improving herd health, and benchmarking for sustainability [44].
Big Data in dairy farming involves collecting and analyzing extensive data from
various sources, like sensor networks and animal health monitoring systems. This compre-
Climate 2024, 12, 15 6 of 22

hensive approach enables farmers to make data-driven decisions, optimizing productivity

and sustainability. Big Data analytics play a crucial role in resource management, par-
ticularly in optimizing feed and water usage, and in analyzing a farm’s climate impact,
especially concerning greenhouse gas emissions [45].
AI technologies bring sophistication to herd management and resource optimization.
Predictive analytics in herd health, powered by AI, revolutionize animal care by anticipating
health issues, thereby enhancing preventive care [46]. AI also optimizes feed composition
and energy management, integrating renewable energy sources like solar or biogas into
operations, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

4.1. Benchmarking for Performance and Sustainability

Benchmarking is a critical process in dairy farming, enabling the comparison of farm
performance against industry standards [47]. It identifies areas for improvement in re-
source utilization, animal health management [Figure 1], and environmental sustainability.
Benchmarking also helps in the adoption of best practices, tracking progress over time, and
ensuring compliance with environmental standards [48]. The process of benchmarking
emissions in the dairy industry is comprehensive, involving identification and quantifica-
tion of emissions sources such as enteric fermentation, manure management, and fossil
Climate 2024, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 23
fuel usage. It entails comparing emission levels with industry standards and best practices,
setting reduction targets, and regular monitoring and reporting.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. AI-enhanced
AI-enhanced benchmarking
benchmarkingfor
foremissions
emissionsininCanadian
Canadiandairy
dairyfarming.
farming.

4.2. Leveraging Cross-Industry Insights for Dairy Farming

The dairy industry can learn from methodologies and sustainability practices from
sectors like food processing, biomedicine, and industrial manufacturing. Techniques from
industrial manufacturing for process optimization, energy management systems from
other industries, and waste-to-resource models from food processing can be adapted to
enhance sustainability in dairy farming. The implementation of Big Data, AI, and bench-
marking in dairy farming represents a transformative leap towards sustainability and ef-
ficiency [49]. By leveraging these technologies, the dairy industry can achieve significant
Climate 2024, 12, 15 7 of 22

4.2. Leveraging Cross-Industry Insights for Dairy Farming

The dairy industry can learn from methodologies and sustainability practices from
sectors like food processing, biomedicine, and industrial manufacturing. Techniques from
industrial manufacturing for process optimization, energy management systems from
other industries, and waste-to-resource models from food processing can be adapted
to enhance sustainability in dairy farming. The implementation of Big Data, AI, and
benchmarking in dairy farming represents a transformative leap towards sustainability and
efficiency [49]. By leveraging these technologies, the dairy industry can achieve significant
gains in environmental stewardship, resource optimization, and overall farm management.
The critical role of benchmarking, particularly in emissions reduction, provides a roadmap
(Table 1) for the dairy industry to align with global sustainability goals and environmental
regulations. The integration of these technologies, coupled with lessons learned from
other industries, paves the way for a more sustainable, efficient, and innovative future in
dairy farming.

Table 1. Benchmarking of emissions in dairy industry.

Aspect of Enteric Manure

Energy Use Feed Efficiency Water Usage
Benchmarking Fermentation Management
Methane and Water
Methane from CO2 from fossil Methane from
Emission Source nitrous oxide from management
digestion fuel use digestion
storage related energy use
CH4 Energy audits, Water usage
Quantification Gas capture and
measurements, carbon Feed analysis, LCA metering, energy
Method analysis, LCA
LCA footprinting audits
X kg Y kg N2 O/ton Z kWh/liter of
Industry Average A kg CH4/ ton feed B liters/milk liter
CH4 /cow/year manure milk
Aerobic
Best Practice Renewable energy High-efficiency Water recycling
Low-methane feed composting,
Standard use feed systems
digesters
Manure treatment, Irrigation
Improvement Feed additives, Solar, biogas
efficient Precision feeding management, leak
Strategy diet optimization energy
application repairs
Monitoring
Bi-annually Annually Quarterly Annually Bi-annually
Frequency
Sustainable Water
Compliance Voluntary industry Environmental Energy
farming management
Requirement standards regulations conservation laws
certifications regulations
Rumen sensors, Emission Smart energy AI-driven feeding Automated
Technology Used
data analytics capturing systems meters systems irrigation
Manure handling, Energy Nutritional Water conservation
Training Required Feed management
system operation management management techniques
Moderate High investment Moderate Moderate
Cost Implication High investment
investment for renewables investment investment
Potential Emission Significant CH4 CH4 and N2 O Significant CO2 Energy-related
CH4 reduction
Reduction reduction reduction reduction emission reduction

In our comprehensive benchmarking analysis of emissions in the dairy industry, as

detailed in Table 1, we systematically evaluate various aspects such as enteric fermentation,
manure management, and energy use. This includes a thorough examination of emission
sources, ranging from methane from digestion to CO2 from fossil fuel use, and strategies for
their quantification, like CH4 measurements and energy audits. The industry averages for
these emissions provide a baseline for setting best practice standards, which include low-
methane feed and renewable energy use. Our study also outlines improvement strategies,
such as diet optimization and efficient manure application, and underscores the importance
of regular monitoring, compliance with environmental regulations, and the use of advanced
technologies like AI-driven feeding systems for effective emission reduction.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 8 of 22

5. The Economic and Structural Landscape of Canadian Dairy Industry

The Canadian dairy industry, integral to the country’s agriculture, epitomizes a com-
plex interplay of economic impact, diverse farm structures, and a stringent regulatory
framework, all of which align to create a unique economic and structural landscape.

5.1. Industry Size and Economic Impact

As of recent data, Canada’s dairy sector is a substantial component of the agricultural
economy. It is not only a significant contributor to the national GDP but also a pivotal player
in the rural economy. The industry is characterized by its extensive production capacity,
involving thousands of dairy farms and processing facilities across the country. These
farms collectively contribute billions to the national economy, underscoring the sector’s
economic significance. The dairy industry’s impact extends beyond direct production. It
encompasses a wide range of associated industries, including feed production, veterinary
services, equipment supply, and transportation. This extensive value chain [50,51] amplifies
the sector’s economic influence, providing employment and stimulating local economies in
rural and urban areas alike.

5.2. Global Market Presence

Despite its robust domestic market, the Canadian dairy industry has a relatively
modest footprint in the global dairy trade. This is primarily due to the country’s supply
management system, which focuses on balancing domestic supply with demand, thus
limiting export volumes [52,53]. However, the industry still contributes significantly to the
global dairy market through specialized products and niche markets. Its reputation for qual-
ity and safety standards positions Canadian dairy products favorably in the international
arena, where they command a premium.

5.3. Diversity in Farm Structures and Operations

Canadian dairy farms exhibit a diverse range of structures and operational scales.
This diversity is reflective of the country’s vast geographical and climatic variations. From
small family-owned farms to large corporate-run facilities, the industry encompasses a
wide spectrum of farming models. This structural diversity is underpinned by a common
commitment to high-quality milk production, animal welfare, and sustainable farming
practices. Technological integration varies across these farms, with some employing cutting-
edge technologies for milking, feeding, and herd management, while others adhere to more
traditional farming methods. This variation is indicative of the sector’s adaptability and its
ability to cater to different market needs and preferences.

5.4. Regulatory Framework Governing Canadian Dairy Farming

The Canadian dairy sector operates under a unique regulatory framework known as
supply management [54]. This system, characterized by production quotas, price setting,
and import controls, ensures stable income for producers and processors. It balances supply
with domestic demand, protecting the industry from market volatilities and ensuring
consistent quality of dairy products. Additionally, the industry adheres to strict standards
regarding animal welfare and environmental sustainability. These regulations, coupled with
initiatives like the ProAction program, underscore the sector’s commitment to responsible
farming practices. The ProAction program, in particular, sets benchmarks [55,56] in areas
such as milk quality, animal health, and environmental stewardship.

5.5. Economic and Policy Challenges

Despite its strengths, the Canadian dairy industry faces several economic and policy
challenges. These include adapting to changing market demands, both domestically and
globally, and responding to pressures from international trade agreements. The sector
also grapples with the need for continuous innovation and sustainability improvements,
particularly in the face of global environmental concerns. Emerging trends, such as the
Climate 2024, 12, 15 9 of 22

growing demand for plant-based alternatives and the increasing importance of sustainable
practices, are set to shape the industry’s future. Adapting to these trends while maintaining
its core values and economic viability will be crucial for the sector’s continued success.

6. Strategies for GHG Emission Reduction in Dairy Farming

In the pursuit of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in dairy farming, a
combination of innovative practices, technological advancements, and supportive policy
initiatives plays a pivotal role. Addressing the emissions from this sector is crucial for
mitigating climate change impacts given the significant contribution of dairy farming to
global GHG emissions, particularly methane (CH4 ) and nitrous oxide (N2 O).

6.1. Innovative Farming Practices for Emission Reduction

6.1.1. Optimized Feed Efficiency
One of the primary strategies in emission reduction is optimizing feed efficiency.
Research has shown that improved feed quality and dietary adjustments can significantly
reduce methane emissions from enteric fermentation. Feed additives, such as lipids, tannins,
and certain enzymes, have been studied for their potential to reduce methane production
during digestion [57–59]. Furthermore, precision feeding techniques, ensuring each animal
receives a diet tailored to its specific needs, not only improve the feed conversion efficiency
but also reduce the overall carbon footprint of the dairy operation.

6.1.2. Advanced Manure Management

Manure management represents a substantial opportunity for emission reduction.
Traditional manure storage and treatment methods often lead to significant methane and
nitrous oxide emissions. Implementing advanced techniques, such as anaerobic digestion,
can convert manure into biogas, a renewable energy source, while significantly reducing
emissions [60,61]. Moreover, innovative practices like composting and improved storage
and application methods can minimize emissions from manure handling.

6.1.3. Pasture-Based Farming

Transitioning to pasture-based systems can also contribute to lowering GHG emis-
sions. Grazing systems promote better manure distribution and can enhance soil carbon
sequestration, reducing the overall carbon footprint compared to conventional confinement
systems [62,63].

6.1.4. Precision Agriculture

The application of precision agriculture technologies is a game-changer in reducing
emissions. Using tools such as GPS, sensors, and data analytics, dairy farmers can optimize
resource use, thereby reducing emissions [64,65]. For instance, sensor-based technologies
can monitor soil health and moisture levels, enabling more efficient use of fertilizers and
irrigation, thereby reducing nitrous oxide emissions from synthetic fertilizers.

6.1.5. Biogas Systems

The adoption of biogas systems for energy production from dairy waste not only
provides a sustainable energy source but also plays a critical role in methane emission
reduction. These systems capture methane from manure and convert it into bioenergy,
effectively reducing the methane emissions associated with manure management practices.
The biogas produced can be used for heating, electricity generation, or even as a vehicle
fuel, contributing to the overall energy sustainability of the dairy farm.

6.1.6. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technologies

Emerging CCS technologies offer potential in mitigating the climatic impact of dairy
operations [66]. While still in development, these technologies aim to capture carbon
emissions directly from various sources within dairy farms, including manure management
Climate 2024, 12, 15 10 of 22

systems and energy consumption processes. Implementing CCS could play a significant
role in reducing the carbon footprint of dairy farming.

6.2. Role of Policy Initiatives and Incentives in Emission Reduction

6.2.1. Federal and Provincial Incentives
Government incentives are crucial in supporting emission reduction efforts in the
dairy sector [67]. These incentives can take various forms, such as funding for adopting
sustainable practices, tax breaks for implementing green technologies, or technical support
for transitioning to low-emission practices. For example, programs like the Sustainable
Canadian Agricultural Partnership (CAP) offer financial assistance for projects aimed at
improving environmental sustainability [68].

6.2.2. Carbon Pricing and Trading Systems

Implementing carbon pricing mechanisms, like carbon taxes or cap-and-trade sys-
tems, encourages emission reductions by attributing a cost to carbon emissions [69,70].
Such mechanisms can incentivize dairy farmers to adopt sustainable practices by making
emission-intensive operations more costly. This economic approach can drive significant
changes in the industry towards more sustainable and low-emission practices.

6.2.3. Research and Development Support

Governmental support for research and development is essential in advancing new
technologies and practices for emission reduction. This includes funding for research
into low-emission animal diets, manure management technologies, and precision farming
tools. Partnerships between the government, academia, and the dairy industry are vital for
fostering innovation and developing practical, scalable solutions for emission reduction.

6.2.4. Extension Services and Education

Providing extension services and education about sustainable practices and technolo-
gies is critical for enabling dairy farmers to effectively implement emission reduction
strategies. These services can offer technical advice, training, and support, helping farm-
ers to understand the benefits of sustainable practices and how to integrate them into
their operations.
Reducing GHG emissions in dairy farming requires a multifaceted approach that
incorporates innovative farming practices, technological advancements, and supportive
policy frameworks [71,72]. The adoption of these strategies not only contributes to climate
change mitigation but also enhances the overall sustainability and resilience of the dairy
sector. Collaboration between farmers, industry stakeholders, researchers, and policymak-
ers is essential in driving these changes and achieving substantial emission reductions in
dairy farming.

7. The Future of Dairy Farming with Big Data

The integration of Big Data into dairy farming is not merely an incremental change
but represents a fundamental shift in agricultural practices. By harnessing the power of
vast datasets, dairy farmers can optimize various aspects of their operations, from herd
management to resource utilization, ushering in a new era of efficiency and sustainability.

7.1. Emerging Technologies in Big Data for Dairy Farming

Big Data in dairy farming involves the collection, analysis, and utilization of large
and complex datasets from various sources, including sensor networks, farm equipment,
and environmental data inputs. These extensive data encompass information ranging
from milk yield and quality metrics to animal feeding patterns, health indicators, and
environmental conditions.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 11 of 22

7.1.1. Advanced Sensors and Monitoring Systems

The deployment of advanced sensor technologies in dairy farming is reshaping the
management of herd health and environmental monitoring. Sensors that track animal
health indicators, such as body temperature and activity levels, along with environmental
sensors measuring factors like air quality and humidity, are generating vast amounts of data.
These sensors provide critical insights into the well-being of the herd and the optimization
of the farm environment.

7.1.2. Data Analytics for Enhanced Decision Making

The analysis of collected data enables farmers to gain comprehensive insights into
their operations. This involves using sophisticated algorithms and machine learning
techniques to process and interpret complex datasets, leading to informed decision making.
For instance, data-driven insights can guide feed composition adjustments, resulting in
improved feed efficiency and reduced waste.

7.1.3. Predictive Modeling for Proactive Management

Utilizing predictive analytics, farmers can forecast future scenarios based on historical
data trends. This proactive approach allows for early intervention in potential issues such
as health problems in the herd or environmental stressors, minimizing risks and enhancing
productivity.

7.2. Integration with Other Technologies: IoT and Robotics

The convergence of Big Data with the Internet of Things (IoT) and robotics is driving
significant advancements in dairy farming. IoT in Dairy Farming: Integrating Big Data
with IoT devices facilitates a more connected and automated farm environment [73,74].
Connected devices such as milking robots, feed dispensers, and climate control systems
can generate real-time data, enhancing precision in farming operations. The integration of
these devices through IoT platforms allows for seamless data flow and analytics, leading to
more efficient and sustainable farm management.

Robotics and Automation

The incorporation of robotics in dairy farming, coupled with Big Data, is revolutioniz-
ing traditional practices. Automated systems for milking, feeding, and cleaning not only
improve efficiency but also reduce the physical labor required. The data generated by
these robotic systems contribute to a deeper understanding of farm operations, enabling
continuous improvement and innovation.

7.3. Policy and Industry Implications of Technological Advancements

The advancements in Big Data and its integration with other technologies have signifi-
cant implications for both policy and the dairy industry. Sustainability and Environmental
Impact—Big Data technologies contribute to the environmental sustainability of dairy
farms by optimizing resource use and reducing waste. This aligns with global efforts
to minimize agriculture’s environmental footprint, particularly concerning greenhouse
gas emissions. Policies encouraging the adoption of such technologies can support the
industry’s transition towards more sustainable practices.

7.3.1. Regulatory Frameworks for Data Use and Privacy

The use of Big Data raises important considerations regarding data privacy and
security. Regulatory frameworks need to be established to protect sensitive farm data,
ensure their ethical use, and clarify issues around data ownership and control [75,76].
Policymakers must balance the need for data protection with the potential benefits of data
sharing and utilization in the industry.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 12 of 22

7.3.2. Industry Adaptation and Skill Development

As dairy farming becomes increasingly data-driven, there is a growing need for skills
development in this area. Training and educational programs focusing on data analytics,
IoT, and robotics are essential for preparing the current and future workforce. The industry
must adapt to these technological changes by fostering a culture of continuous learning
and innovation.

7.3.3. Economic Considerations and Market Adaptation

The economic implications of adopting Big Data technologies in dairy farming cannot
be overlooked. While the initial investment may be substantial, the long-term benefits
in terms of efficiency, productivity, and sustainability can offer a significant return on
investment. The market readiness to accept and integrate these technologies is also a crucial
factor, influencing their widespread adoption and economic viability.

7.4. Digital Technology’s Role in Enhancing Dairy Farm Emission Efficiency

In their 2023 study, Liu et al. [77] provide a comprehensive analysis of how digital
technology applications enhance carbon emission efficiency in dairy farms. Utilizing a
robust methodology involving the Undesirable Outputs-SBM model, Tobit model, propen-
sity score matching, quantile regression model, and an instrumental variable approach,
the study examines 136 Chinese dairy farms. The focus is on the impact of digital technol-
ogy, particularly precision feeding, on carbon emission efficiency, and how environmental
regulations modulate this relationship.
The key findings reveal that digital technology significantly improves carbon emission
efficiency, with the most substantial impact observed in farms with lower initial efficiency
levels. Precision feeding technology emerges as the most effective, followed by manure
treatment, environmental monitoring, and cow monitoring technologies. The study also
highlights the critical role of environmental regulations in enhancing this effect; more strin-
gent regulations amplify the positive impact of digital technology on emission efficiency.
Further, the study underscores the influence of factors such as farmers’ educational
background and technical training in adopting digital technologies. It notes that implemen-
tation of digital technology could potentially increase carbon emission efficiency by 11.61%
in dairy farms. This finding emphasizes the need for enhanced educational and policy
initiatives to promote digital technology use in dairy farming, aligning with low-carbon
and efficient production goals.
The research by Liu et al., (2023) [77] provides empirical evidence on the pivotal role
of digital technologies in reducing carbon emissions in the dairy industry, highlighting
the need for supportive educational and regulatory environments to maximize these
technologies’ benefits.

8. Artificial Intelligence in Emission Management and Energy Efficiency in

Dairy Farming
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a pivotal tool in the agricultural sector,
particularly in dairy farming, where it offers substantial potential for improving emis-
sion management and enhancing energy efficiency. The deployment of AI in this context
addresses two critical areas: predictive analytics for optimizing feed and manure manage-
ment, and monitoring of and reduction in energy use. AI’s role in emission management
and energy efficiency in dairy farming is multidimensional and highly impactful. As AI
technology advances, its integration into dairy farming practices promises to drive signifi-
cant improvements in environmental sustainability, operational efficiency, and economic
viability. The key to realizing these benefits lies in overcoming the current challenges and
continuing innovation and development in AI applications specific to the dairy industry.
This evolution of AI in dairy farming not only contributes to reducing the environmental
footprint of the sector but also aligns with the broader goals of sustainable agriculture and
climate change mitigation.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 13 of 22

The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in feed optimization for dairy farming
involves the development and implementation of algorithms capable of analyzing extensive
datasets. These algorithms are designed to predict the most efficient feed compositions
and schedules, taking into account individual animal health, milk production, and varying
environmental conditions [78,79]. This data analysis is critical in understanding how
different feeds impact milk yield, quality, and the overall health of the herd.
A significant focus of feed optimization using AI is the reduction in methane emis-
sions produced during enteric fermentation. AI models are equipped to suggest dietary
adjustments that minimize methane production, considering breed-specific responses and
the diverse nutritional needs of the herd. Optimizing feed through AI not only contributes
to reducing methane emissions but also enhances feed efficiency. This leads to lower
production costs and a reduced environmental impact while simultaneously improving
animal health and productivity.
In the realm of manure management, another critical area for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions in dairy farming, AI systems offer significant benefits. They can predict optimal
times and methods for manure application, storage, and processing, taking into account
external factors such as weather patterns and soil conditions. This guidance helps farmers
make decisions that not only reduce emissions but also enhance soil quality.
AI’s role extends to optimizing anaerobic digestion processes, where it can improve
the conversion of manure into biogas, thereby reducing methane emissions. By determin-
ing the optimal mix of manure and other organic wastes, AI models ensure maximum
biogas production with minimum greenhouse gas emissions. This optimization is a tes-
tament to AI’s growing significance in enhancing environmental sustainability in dairy
farming practices.

AI in Monitoring and Reducing Energy Use

Energy management is a critical aspect where AI can make a significant impact. The
application of AI in energy use within dairy farms entails:
AI-driven smart energy systems are increasingly pivotal in managing and optimizing
energy consumption on dairy farms. These sophisticated systems utilize AI algorithms to
forecast energy needs and effectively integrate renewable energy sources. For example, AI
can optimize the use of solar panels or biogas, a renewable energy source generated from
manure, enhancing the energy efficiency of dairy farming operations.
In the realm of energy consumption, AI algorithms excel in monitoring and analyzing
patterns across various dairy farm operations, including milking, cooling, and process-
ing [80]. This monitoring is instrumental in identifying areas where energy consumption
can be reduced and more efficient practices can be implemented. By pinpointing these areas,
dairy farms can significantly cut down on energy usage, contributing to both economic and
environmental sustainability.
Another crucial aspect of AI in dairy farming is predictive maintenance. AI can
accurately predict when machinery or equipment requires maintenance, thereby avoiding
energy wastage due to inefficient operation. This predictive maintenance ensures that farm
equipment operates at optimal energy efficiency, leading to a reduction in unnecessary
energy consumption and associated costs.
The integration of AI with renewable energy sources on dairy farms offers a promising
pathway toward reducing dependence on fossil fuels. AI can skillfully balance the use
of renewable energy sources with traditional energy sources. This balance is essential
for maintaining a consistent energy supply and minimizing the carbon footprint of dairy
farming operations. Additionally, AI systems are adept at forecasting weather conditions
and energy requirements. This capability aids in planning and optimizing the use of
renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind energy, on dairy farms. This integration
not only enhances energy efficiency but also supports the broader goal of sustainable and
environmentally responsible dairy farming.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 14 of 22

9. Future Pathways—Implementing AI and Big Data in Dairy Farming for Climate

Change Mitigation and Emissions Reduction
In envisioning a roadmap for future research and application of AI and Big Data
in dairy farming (Figure 2), particularly in addressing climate change challenges and
emissions reduction, a strategic and methodical approach is required. This roadmap should
Climate 2024, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 23
encompass both immediate and long-term strategies, integrating the latest advancements
in technology with practical on-the-ground farming practices.

Figure 2. Harnessing Big Data and AI for sustainable dairy farming—a visual guide to emission
Figure 2. Harnessing Big Data and AI for sustainable dairy farming—a visual guide to emission
reduction and benchmarking.
reduction and benchmarking.
9.1.Immediate
9.1. Immediate Strategies
Strategies
9.1.1.Enhanced
9.1.1. Enhanced Data
Data Collection
Collection and Analysis
•• Investin
Invest insensor
sensortechnologies
technologiesand
andIoT
IoTdevices
devicestotocollect
collectcomprehensive
comprehensivedatadata
onon vari-
various
ous aspects
aspects of dairy
of dairy farming,
farming, including
including feed intake,
feed intake, animalanimal
health,health, and manure
and manure man-
management.
• agement.
Utilize advanced data analytics and machine learning algorithms to process these
• data, identifying
Utilize advancedpatterns and correlations
data analytics and machinethat learning
can inform more sustainable
algorithms farming
to process these
practices.
data, identifying patterns and correlations that can inform more sustainable farming
practices.
9.1.2. Predictive Analytics for Resource Optimization
•9.1.2.Develop AI Analytics
Predictive models that
for can predict
Resource optimal feeding strategies, reducing waste and
Optimization
• improving
Develop AIthe efficiency
models that of
canresource
predict use.
optimal feeding strategies, reducing waste and
• Implement systems that can forecast
improving the efficiency of resource use. environmental impacts and provide recommen-
dations for minimizing carbon footprints.
• Implement systems that can forecast environmental impacts and provide recommen-
dations for minimizing carbon footprints.
9.2. Long-Term Strategies
9.2.1. Integration of Climate Models with Farm Management Systems
• Collaborate with climate scientists to integrate global and regional climate models
into AI-driven farm management systems.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 15 of 22

9.2. Long-Term Strategies

9.2.1. Integration of Climate Models with Farm Management Systems
• Collaborate with climate scientists to integrate global and regional climate models into
AI-driven farm management systems.
• Use these integrated models to anticipate and mitigate the impacts of climate variabil-
ity on dairy farming operations.

9.2.2. Development of AI-Driven Sustainable Practices

• Focus on AI innovations that promote sustainable practices, such as precision agricul-
ture techniques to optimize the use of water, fertilizers, and energy.
• Explore AI-based solutions for managing waste and manure in environmentally
friendly ways, such as converting waste into renewable energy sources.

9.3. Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing

Fostering Industry–Academia Partnerships
• Encourage partnerships between dairy farmers, technology companies, and academic
institutions to drive innovation and research in AI and Big Data applications.
• Facilitate knowledge sharing and technology transfer through workshops, conferences,
and joint research projects.

9.4. Policy Advocacy and Support for Technological Adoption

• Engage with policymakers to advocate for support and funding for the adoption of AI
and Big Data technologies in dairy farming.
• Work towards the development of regulatory frameworks that encourage innovation
while ensuring ethical and sustainable use of technology.

9.5. Adaptive and Evolving Methodologies

Continuous Improvement and Adaptation
• Establish a culture of continuous improvement, where technologies and methodologies
are regularly reviewed and updated based on new research and changing climate
conditions.
• Embrace adaptive management approaches that allow for flexibility and responsive-
ness to new challenges and opportunities.

9.6. Monitoring and Evaluation

• Implement robust monitoring and evaluation systems to assess the effectiveness of AI
and Big Data applications in reducing emissions and addressing climate change.
• Use these assessments to refine and improve strategies over time, ensuring that the
dairy farming industry can effectively contribute to global climate change mitiga-
tion efforts.
By following this roadmap, the dairy farming industry can not only significantly
reduce its environmental impact but also enhance productivity and resilience in the face
of climate change. This comprehensive approach, blending cutting-edge technology with
practical farming practices and policy support, paves the way for a more sustainable and
environmentally responsible future in dairy farming.

10. Challenges and Future Directions

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in dairy farming, while holding immense
potential, faces several challenges that need to be addressed for wider adoption and
effective utilization. One of the primary challenges is the complexity of integrating AI with
existing farming systems. This integration is not just a matter of software compatibility; it
requires the systems to effectively process and analyze diverse data types, which is essential
for the AI to function optimally.
Climate 2024, 12, 15 16 of 22

Another critical issue involves the quality and availability of data, which are foun-
dational for the effectiveness of AI. The performance of AI systems can be significantly
hindered by inconsistent data recording practices and the limited availability of compre-
hensive data. This challenge underscores the need for standardized, high-quality data
collection practices in the dairy farming sector.
Moreover, the successful implementation of AI in dairy farming hinges on the training
and adaptation of farmers. It is imperative for farmers to receive adequate training to
understand and manage AI systems effectively. This aspect involves overcoming potential
resistance to new technologies and facilitating a smooth transition from traditional farming
practices to more technologically advanced methods.
Looking towards future advancements, several key developments are anticipated
to enhance the role of AI in dairy farming. One such advancement is the continuous
improvement in the accuracy of AI algorithms, which will lead to more efficient and
effective farm management practices. Additionally, the integration of AI with Internet of
Things (IoT) devices is expected to play a significant role. This integration will provide
more detailed and granular data, further optimizing farm operations and energy usage.
Furthermore, the development of customized AI solutions tailored to the specific needs
of different farming operations will greatly enhance the applicability and effectiveness of
AI in the dairy industry. These customized solutions will address the unique challenges
and requirements of various farming setups, thereby maximizing the benefits of AI in
dairy farming.
While the integration of AI in dairy farming presents challenges, the future holds
promising advancements that will likely overcome these hurdles. Continuous improve-
ments in AI technology, coupled with better integration and customization, are poised to
transform dairy farming into a more efficient, sustainable, and economically viable sector.

Addressing Challenges and Enhancing Policies for Sustainable Transformation

Addressing the multifaceted challenges and enhancing policies for a sustainable
transformation in dairy farming involves navigating through technological, economic, and
policy barriers. These barriers need to be methodically addressed to facilitate the transition
to more sustainable practices. Simultaneously, it is crucial to ensure that technological
advancements are harmonized with ethical farming practices.
Table 2 presents a comprehensive policy framework essential for sustainable transfor-
mation in the dairy farming industry. It details various policy focuses, from establishing
benchmarking standards to promoting Big Data utilization and integrating AI technologies,
which collectively aim to enhance farm efficiency and achieve significant reductions in
greenhouse gas emissions. The table also highlights the key components of each policy, the
stakeholders involved, the challenges faced, and the potential outcomes. This framework
serves as a roadmap for stakeholders at various levels, including farmers, industry regula-
tors, tech companies, and government bodies, guiding the industry towards a sustainable
and environmentally responsible future while balancing economic viability.

Table 2. Policy framework for sustainable transformation in dairy farming.

Key Stakeholders Potential

Policy Focus Objective Challenges
Components Involved Outcomes
Establish
Comparative
industry-wide Farmers, Industry Consistent quality
analysis, Best Standardization
Benchmarking benchmarking regulators, and sustainability
practices, across diverse farm
Standards standards for Environmental metrics across the
Performance operations
emissions and agencies industry
metrics
efficiency
Climate 2024, 12, 15 17 of 22

Table 2. Cont.

Key Stakeholders Potential

Policy Focus Objective Challenges
Components Involved Outcomes
Managing large
Promote the use of Data collection, Optimized farm
Farmers, Tech datasets,
Big Data Big Data for farm Analysis tools, operations,
companies, Data Interpreting
Utilization management Real-time Enhanced decision
analysts complex
optimization monitoring making
information.
Balancing
Set clear and Methane and N2 O Government, Significant
economic viability
Emission achievable reduction, Carbon Environmental reduction in
with
Reduction Targets emission reduction footprint groups, Dairy greenhouse gas
environmental
targets assessment producers emissions
goals.
Predictive
Facilitate the Adapting to new
analytics, Herd Tech developers, Increased farm
AI Integration in integration of AI technologies,
management, Farmers, AI efficiency and
Farming technologies in Overcoming
Resource experts reduced labor costs
dairy farming resistance
optimization
Ensure the security Data encryption, Farmers, Data Risk of data
Protected farmer
Data Privacy and and privacy of User consent, protection breaches,
data, Ethical
Security farm data collected Ethical use agencies, Legal Maintaining
technology usage
via digital means. guidelines experts farmer trust
Encourage the use Energy companies,
Subsidies, Tax Initial investment Reduced carbon
Renewable Energy of renewable Farmers,
breaks, Green costs, Long-term footprint, Energy
Incentives energy sources Government
energy solutions sustainability self-sufficiency
through incentives. bodies
Enhance farmer Educational Varied Improved
Workshops, Online
Education and knowledge and institutions, Dairy technological adoption of
courses, Technical
Training skills in advanced farmers, Industry proficiency among advanced farming
assistance
technologies experts farmers technologies
Foster
Joint funding, Synergy in
collaboration Government,
Knowledge Aligning goals and innovation,
Public-Private between Corporates,
exchange, resources of Accelerated
Partnerships government, Research
Innovation different entities technology
industry, and institutions
incubators transfer
academia
Implement Compliance Enhanced
Ensuring
stringent standards, Regulatory bodies, environmental
Environmental regulations are
environmental Monitoring, Dairy farmers, protection,
Regulation effective yet
regulations to Penalties for Environmentalists Sustainable dairy
feasible
control emissions. non-compliance practices.
Support research Innovative feed
Scientists, Dairy Translating
and development solutions, Waste Breakthroughs in
Innovation and industry, research into
in sustainable management, sustainable
R&D Support Government practical, scalable
dairy farming Energy-efficient farming techniques
funders solutions
technologies. practices

11. Overcoming Technological, Economic, and Policy Barriers

Technological barriers in dairy farming often stem from the complexity of integrating
new technologies with existing systems. This includes ensuring compatibility with current
hardware and software and effectively processing diverse data types. To overcome these
challenges, there is a need for technologies that are adaptable, user-friendly, and can
seamlessly integrate with various farming operations. Additionally, addressing data quality
and availability is crucial. Inconsistent data recording practices and limited data availability
can impede AI systems’ performance. Establishing standardized data collection methods
and ensuring the availability of high-quality, comprehensive datasets are imperative.
Economic barriers, primarily the high costs associated with adopting new technologies,
pose a significant hurdle. This is particularly challenging for small- and medium-sized
Climate 2024, 12, 15 18 of 22

farms. Addressing these barriers requires the implementation of financial incentives such
as subsidies, grants, or tax breaks to make investments more feasible for farmers. Moreover,
demonstrating the long-term economic benefits of these technologies through case studies
and pilot projects can encourage broader adoption.
Policy barriers often involve existing regulations that are not adapted to new tech-
nologies, hindering their implementation. To address this, regulatory frameworks need
regular review and reform to keep pace with technological advancements. This includes
relaxing certain regulatory barriers and developing standards that encourage innovation
while ensuring safety and sustainability.

11.1. Enhancing Policies for Emission Reduction and Sustainable Practices

Enhancing policies to support emission reduction and sustainable practices in dairy
farming is essential. This can be achieved by developing and implementing policies that
support the transition to sustainable dairy farming, providing a regulatory environment
that encourages the adoption of sustainable practices. Governments can play a pivotal role
by offering financial incentives and investing in research and development of sustainable
dairy farming technologies.
Creating sustainability guidelines is also critical. Policymakers should establish guide-
lines that promote sustainability and environmental responsibility in dairy farming, ensur-
ing that the industry’s growth aligns with environmental conservation goals. This could
involve setting clear, measurable emission reduction targets specific to the dairy sector,
aligning with broader sustainability goals.

11.2. Balancing Technological Advancement with Ethical Farming Practices

The integration of technology in dairy farming should complement, not replace, tradi-
tional farming practices. It should respect the cultural heritage of farming communities and
adapt to fit within their existing cultural framework. This includes developing technolo-
gies that enhance rather than overhaul existing practices and ensuring that technological
development involves farmers in the design process.
Ensuring equity and inclusivity in technological advancement is crucial. Technologies
must be accessible to all farmers, including smallholders and family-owned farms, and
training and support must be provided to ensure that farmers have the knowledge and
skills to effectively utilize these tools.
Regulatory and policy frameworks should establish clear guidelines for the ethical use
of technology in dairy farming. These guidelines could cover aspects such as data privacy,
animal welfare, and labor rights. Effective regulatory frameworks should also include
mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of technology and enforcing compliance
with ethical standards.
Addressing challenges and enhancing policies for sustainable transformation in dairy
farming requires a multifaceted approach. By overcoming technological, economic, and
policy barriers, enhancing policies for emission reduction and sustainable practices, and
ensuring that technological advancements are balanced with ethical farming practices, the
dairy industry can move towards a more sustainable and environmentally responsible
future. This transition not only aligns with environmental imperatives but also ensures the
economic viability and cultural sustainability of the dairy farming sector.

12. Summary and Conclusions

Dairy processing, an energy-intensive process, significantly contributes to GHG emis-
sions. Mitigating these emissions involves transitioning to renewable energy sources and
implementing energy efficiency measures. Innovations like waste heat recovery and the
use of energy-efficient equipment can reduce the energy footprint of dairy processing,
decreasing operational costs and GHG emissions.
The advent of Big Data and AI has revolutionized dairy farming, offering enhanced
efficiency, improved sustainability, and innovative management practices. These tech-
Climate 2024, 12, 15 19 of 22

nologies address challenges in resource optimization and herd health management. Big
Data analytics, involving collecting and analyzing extensive data, enables farmers to make
informed decisions for productivity and sustainability. AI brings sophistication to herd
management and resource optimization, with applications in predictive analytics for feed
optimization and manure management. Benchmarking for performance and sustainability,
involving comparing farm performance against industry standards, helps in identifying
improvement areas and ensuring compliance with environmental standards.
The implementation of Big Data and AI in dairy farming marks a transformative leap
towards sustainability and efficiency. By leveraging these technologies, the dairy industry
can make significant gains in environmental stewardship, resource optimization, and
overall farm management. However, this transformation also brings challenges, including
integrating AI with existing farming systems, ensuring data quality, and farmer training.
Addressing these challenges involves developing adaptable, user-friendly technologies,
standardized data collection methods, and comprehensive farmer training programs.
Policies play a crucial role in supporting this transformation. Governments can offer
financial incentives, invest in research and development, and implement sustainability
guidelines. Creating a regulatory environment that encourages the adoption of sustainable
practices and aligns industry growth with environmental conservation goals is essential.
The study concludes that a multifaceted approach is needed to address technological,
economic, and policy barriers and enhance policies for emission reduction and sustainable
practices. The integration of technology in dairy farming should complement traditional
practices and respect the cultural heritage of farming communities. Ensuring equity and
inclusivity in technological advancement is crucial, as is establishing guidelines for the
ethical use of technology in dairy farming.
By overcoming these challenges and enhancing policies for sustainable transformation,
the dairy industry can progress towards a more sustainable and environmentally responsi-
ble future. This transition not only aligns with environmental imperatives but also ensures
the economic viability and cultural sustainability of the dairy farming sector. The integra-
tion of Big Data and AI emerges as a crucial factor in this journey towards sustainability,
offering innovative solutions to reduce GHG emissions and optimize resource use, thereby
contributing significantly to global efforts in environmental sustainability.

Funding: This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References
1. Easterling, D.R.; Kunkel, K.E. Climate Change in the Earth System. In Climate Change and Estuaries; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL,
USA, 2023; pp. 23–42.
2. Sudo, K. Atmospheric Mixing Ratios of Ozone and Radiative Forcing. In Handbook of Air Quality and Climate Change; Springer
Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023; pp. 997–1029.
3. Pouresmaeily, M. Ecological Responses to Climate Change. In Climate Change: The Social and Scientific Construct; Springer
International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 133–149.
4. Falkenberg, L.J.; Bellerby, R.G.; Connell, S.D.; Fleming, L.E.; Maycock, B.; Russell, B.D.; Sullivan, F.J.; Dupont, S. Ocean
acidification and human health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4563. [CrossRef]
5. Rogelj, J.; Geden, O.; Cowie, A.; Reisinger, A. Three ways to improve net-zero emissions targets. Nature 2021, 591, 365–368.
[CrossRef]
6. McLaren, D.P.; Tyfield, D.P.; Willis, R.; Szerszynski, B.; Markusson, N.O. Beyond “net-zero”: A case for separate targets for
emissions reduction and negative emissions. Front. Clim. 2019, 1, 4. [CrossRef]
7. Huang, M.T.; Zhai, P.M. Achieving Paris Agreement temperature goals requires carbon neutrality by middle century with
far-reaching transitions in the whole society. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 2021, 12, 281–286. [CrossRef]
8. Wilberforce, T.; Olabi, A.G.; Sayed, E.T.; Elsaid, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Progress in carbon capture technologies. Sci. Total Environ.
2021, 761, 143203. [CrossRef]
9. Mentes, M. Sustainable development economy and the development of green economy in the European Union. Energy Sustain.
Soc. 2023, 13, 32. [CrossRef]
10. Petri, F.; Biedenkopf, K. “United we stand, divided we fall”: The effects of US contestation on EU foreign climate policy ambition.
Glob. Aff. 2020, 6, 381–397. [CrossRef]
Climate 2024, 12, 15 20 of 22

11. Hughes, L. Warming of 1.5 ◦ C What we do now matters more than ever. ReNew Technol. Sustain. Future 2019, 146, 24–27.
12. Stern, N.; Valero, A. Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions. Res. Policy 2021, 50, 104293. [CrossRef]
13. Wattiaux, M.A.; Uddin, M.E.; Letelier, P.; Jackson, R.D.; Larson, R.A. Invited Review: Emission and mitigation of greenhouse
gases from dairy farms: The cow, the manure, and the field. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 35, 238–254. [CrossRef]
14. Gavrilova, O.; Leip, A.; Dong, H.; MacDonald, J.D.; Gomez Bravo, C.A.; Amon, B.; Barahona Rosales, R.; Prado, A.D.; de Lima,
M.A.; Oyhantcabal, W.; et al. Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
15. Windfeld, E.; Lhermie, G. The value of Canadian agriculture: Direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts. Front. Sustain. Food
Syst. 2022, 6, 940968. [CrossRef]
16. Biden, S.; Ker, A.P.; Duff, S. Impacts of trade liberalization in Canada’s supply managed dairy industry. Agric. Econ. 2020, 51,
535–552. [CrossRef]
17. Berton, M.; Bovolenta, S.; Corazzin, M.; Gallo, L.; Pinterits, S.; Ramanzin, M.; Ressi, W.; Spigarelli, C.; Zuliani, A.; Sturaro, E.
Environmental impacts of milk production and processing in the Eastern Alps: A “cradle-to-dairy gate” LCA approach. J. Clean.
Prod. 2021, 303, 127056. [CrossRef]
18. Clay, N.; Garnett, T.; Lorimer, J. Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives. Ambio 2020, 49, 35–48. [CrossRef]
19. Biagetti, E.; Gislon, G.; Martella, A.; Zucali, M.; Bava, L.; Franco, S.; Sandrucci, A. Comparison of the use of life cycle assessment
and ecological footprint methods for evaluating environmental performances in dairy production. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905,
166845. [CrossRef]
20. Cholewińska, P.; Czyż, K.; Nowakowski, P.; Wyrostek, A. The microbiome of the digestive system of ruminants—A review. Anim.
Health Res. Rev. 2020, 21, 3–14. [CrossRef]
21. Ungerfeld, E.M.; Cancino-Padilla, N.; Vera-Aguilera, N. Fermentation in the rumen. In Microbial Fermentations in Nature and as
Designed Processes; Hurst, C.J., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 133–165.
22. Liu, S.; Proudman, J.; Mitloehner, F.M. Rethinking methane from animal agriculture. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2021, 2, 1–13. [CrossRef]
23. Dobson, S.; Goodday, V.; Winter, J. If it matters, measure it: A review of methane sources and mitigation policy in Canada. Int.
Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2023, 16, 309–429. [CrossRef]
24. Parker, K. “Cow-nting down”: Regulatory measures to reduce New Zealand’s biogenic methane emissions. N. Z. J. Environ. Law
2021, 25, 191–215.
25. Beauchemin, K.A.; Ungerfeld, E.M.; Eckard, R.J.; Wang, M. Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: Lessons learned
and future challenges for mitigation. Animal 2020, 14, s2–s16. [CrossRef]
26. Honan, M.; Feng, X.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E. Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in
cattle: Modes of action, effectiveness and safety. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2022, 62, 1303–1317. [CrossRef]
27. Rivera, J.E.; Chará, J. CH4 and N2O emissions from cattle excreta: A review of main drivers and mitigation strategies in grazing
systems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 657936. [CrossRef]
28. Costa, C.; Wironen, M.; Racette, K.; Wollenberg, E.K. Global Warming Potential*(GWP*): Understanding the Implications for Mitigating
Methane Emissions in Agriculture; CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS):
Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2021.
29. Rotz, A.; Stout, R.; Leytem, A.; Feyereisen, G.; Waldrip, H.; Thoma, G.; Holly, M.; Bjorneberg, D.; Baker, J.; Vadas, P.; et al.
Environmental assessment of United States dairy farms. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 315, 128153. [CrossRef]
30. Khoshnevisan, B.; Duan, N.; Tsapekos, P.; Awasthi, M.K.; Liu, Z.; Mohammadi, A.; Angelidaki, I.; Tsang, D.C.; Zhang, Z.; Pan, J.;
et al. A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives. Renew.
Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110033. [CrossRef]
31. O’Brien, P.L.; Hatfield, J.L. Dairy Manure and Synthetic Fertilizer: A Meta-Analysis of Crop Production and Environmental
Quality. Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ. 2019, 2, 1–12. [CrossRef]
32. Woolery, S.; Osei, E.; Yu, M.; Guney, S.; Lovell, A.; Jafri, H. The Carbon Footprint of a 5000-Milking-Head Dairy Operation in
Central Texas. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2109. [CrossRef]
33. Arvidsson Segerkvist, K.; Hansson, H.; Sonesson, U.; Gunnarsson, S. Research on environmental, economic, and social sustain-
ability in dairy farming: A systematic mapping of current literature. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5502. [CrossRef]
34. Ravishankara, A.R.; Daniel, J.S.; Portmann, R.W. Nitrous oxide (N2 O): The dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the
21st century. Science 2009, 326, 123–125. [CrossRef]
35. Neethirajan, S. Artificial Intelligence and Sensor Technologies in Dairy Livestock Export: Charting a Digital Transformation.
Sensors 2023, 23, 7045. [CrossRef]
36. Neethirajan, S. The role of sensors, big data and machine learning in modern animal farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2020, 29, 100367.
[CrossRef]
37. Neethirajan, S. AI-Driven Climate Neutrality in Dairy Farming: Benchmarking Emissions for Sustainable Transformation. 2023.
Available online: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/4znq5 (accessed on 15 December 2023).
38. Pitta, D.W.; Indugu, N.; Melgar, A.; Hristov, A.; Challa, K.; Vecchiarelli, B.; Hennessy, M.; Narayan, K.; Duval, S.; Kindermann, M.;
et al. The effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol, a potent methane inhibitor, on ruminal microbial gene expression profiles in dairy cows.
Microbiome 2022, 10, 1–21. [CrossRef]
39. Fouts, J.Q.; Honan, M.C.; Roque, B.M.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E. Enteric methane mitigation interventions. Transl. Anim. Sci.
2022, 6, txac041. [CrossRef]
Climate 2024, 12, 15 21 of 22

40. Obileke, K.; Nwokolo, N.; Makaka, G.; Mukumba, P.; Onyeaka, H. Anaerobic digestion: Technology for biogas production as a
source of renewable energy—A review. Energy Environ. 2021, 32, 191–225. [CrossRef]
41. Malliaroudaki, M.I.; Watson, N.J.; Ferrari, R.; Nchari, L.N.; Gomes, R.L. Energy management for a net zero dairy supply chain
under climate change. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 126, 153–167.
42. Malliaroudaki, M.I.; Watson, N.J.; Glover, Z.J.; Nchari, L.N.; Gomes, R.L. Net zero roadmap modelling for sustainable dairy
manufacturing and distribution. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 475, 145734. [CrossRef]
43. Paris, B.; Vandorou, F.; Tyris, D.; Balafoutis, A.T.; Vaiopoulos, K.; Kyriakarakos, G.; Manolakos, D.; Papadakis, G. Energy use in
the EU livestock sector: A review recommending energy efficiency measures and renewable energy sources adoption. Appl. Sci.
2022, 12, 2142. [CrossRef]
44. Bertoglio, R.; Corbo, C.; Renga, F.M.; Matteucci, M. The digital agricultural revolution: A bibliometric analysis literature review.
IEEE Access 2021, 9, 134762–134782. [CrossRef]
45. Neethirajan, S.; Kemp, B. Digital livestock farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2021, 32, 100408. [CrossRef]
46. Neethirajan, S. SOLARIA-SensOr-driven resiLient and adaptive monitoRIng of farm Animals. Agriculture 2023, 13, 436. [CrossRef]
47. Kofler, J.; Suntinger, M.; Mayerhofer, M.; Linke, K.; Maurer, L.; Hund, A.; Fiedler, A.; Duda, J.; Egger-Danner, C. Benchmarking
based on regularly recorded claw health data of Austrian dairy cattle for implementation in the Cattle Data Network (RDV).
Animals 2022, 12, 808. [CrossRef]
48. Poulopoulou, I.; Zanon, T.; Alrhmoun, M.; Katzenberger, K.; Holighaus, L.; Gauly, M. Development of a benchmarking tool to
assess the welfare of dairy cattle on small-scale farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 6464–6475. [CrossRef]
49. Kakani, V.; Nguyen, V.H.; Kumar, B.P.; Kim, H.; Pasupuleti, V.R. A critical review on computer vision and artificial intelligence in
food industry. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020, 2, 100033. [CrossRef]
50. Grandsir, C.; Falagán, N.; Alamar, M.C. Application of novel technologies to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in the fresh
pasteurised milk supply chain: A review. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2023, 76, 38–50. [CrossRef]
51. Snorek, J.; Cummings, W.; Hryniewicz, E.; Stevens, K.; Iannuzzi, R. Diversification strategies for the resilience of small New
England dairies. J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev. 2023, 12, 1–21. [CrossRef]
52. Mazzetto, A.M.; Falconer, S.; Ledgard, S. Mapping the carbon footprint of milk production from cattle: A systematic review. J.
Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 9713–9725. [CrossRef]
53. Auclair, O.; Burgos, S.A. Carbon footprint of Canadian self-selected diets: Comparing intake of foods, nutrients, and diet quality
between low-and high-greenhouse gas emission diets. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 316, 128245. [CrossRef]
54. Peta, C. Canada’s Supply Management System and the Dairy Industry in the Era of Trade Liberalization: A Cultural Commodity?
Am. Rev. Can. Stud. 2019, 49, 547–562. [CrossRef]
55. Ritter, C.; Mills, K.E.; Weary, D.M.; von Keyserlingk, M.A. Perspectives of western Canadian dairy farmers on the future of
farming. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 10273–10282. [CrossRef]
56. Denis-Robichaud, J.; Kelton, D.F.; Bauman, C.A.; Barkema, H.W.; Keefe, G.P.; Dubuc, J. Biosecurity and herd health management
practices on Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 9536–9547. [CrossRef]
57. Beauchemin, K.A.; Ungerfeld, E.M.; Abdalla, A.L.; Alvarez, C.; Arndt, C.; Becquet, P.; Benchaar, C.; Berndt, A.; Mauricio, R.M.;
McAllister, T.A.; et al. Invited review: Current enteric methane mitigation options. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 9297–9326. [CrossRef]
58. Arndt, C.; Hristov, A.N.; Price, W.J.; McClelland, S.C.; Pelaez, A.M.; Cueva, S.F.; Oh, J.; Bannink, A.; Bayat, A.R.; Crompton, L.A.;
et al. Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions by ruminants-a way to approach the 2.0 ◦ C target. AgriRxiv 2021, AgriRxiv:
20210085288. [CrossRef]
59. Min, B.R.; Solaiman, S.; Waldrip, H.M.; Parker, D.; Todd, R.W.; Brauer, D. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from
ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 6, 231–246. [CrossRef]
60. Bhatnagar, N.; Ryan, D.; Murphy, R.; Enright, A.M. A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal
manure and chicken litter feedstock potential–Global and Irish perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111884.
[CrossRef]
61. Yao, Y.; Huang, G.; An, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, P.; Xin, X.; Shen, J.; Agnew, J. Anaerobic digestion of livestock manure in cold regions:
Technological advancements and global impacts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 119, 109494. [CrossRef]
62. Franzluebbers, A.J. Cattle Grazing Effects on the Environment: Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Footprint. In Management
Strategies for Sustainable Cattle Production in Southern Pastures; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 11–34.
63. Lal, R. Reducing carbon footprints of agriculture and food systems. Carbon Footpr. 2022, 1, 3. [CrossRef]
64. Niloofar, P.; Francis, D.P.; Lazarova-Molnar, S.; Vulpe, A.; Vochin, M.C.; Suciu, G.; Balanescu, M.; Anestis, V.; Bartzanas, T.
Data-driven decision support in livestock farming for improved animal health, welfare and greenhouse gas emissions: Overview
and challenges. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 190, 106406. [CrossRef]
65. Lovarelli, D.; Bacenetti, J.; Guarino, M. A review on dairy cattle farming: Is precision livestock farming the compromise for an
environmental, economic and social sustainable production? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121409. [CrossRef]
66. Vitillo, J.G.; Eisaman, M.D.; Aradóttir, E.S.; Passarini, F.; Wang, T.; Sheehan, S.W. The role of carbon capture, utilization, and
storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5 ◦ C. iScience 2022, 25, 5. [CrossRef]
67. Winsten, J.R.; Gorman, E.; Gravitz, A. Coordinating a “basket of incentives” to facilitate resilience in the dairy sector. J. Soil Water
Conserv. 2020, 75, 144A–149A. [CrossRef]
Climate 2024, 12, 15 22 of 22

68. Cameron, G.; Rosado, F.R.P.; Mederos, D.D.D. Agricultural co-operatives in Canada and Cuba: Trends, prospects and ways
forward. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 22, 643–660. [CrossRef]
69. Stavins, R.N. Carbon Taxes vs. Cap and Trade: Theory and Practice; Harvard Project on Climate Agreements: Cambridge, MA,
USA, 2019.
70. Green, J.F. Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 043004. [CrossRef]
71. Henchion, M.M.; Regan, Á.; Beecher, M.; MackenWalsh, Á. Developing ‘Smart’ Dairy Farming Responsive to Farmers and
Consumer-Citizens: A Review. Animals 2022, 12, 360. [CrossRef]
72. Steenwerth, K.L.; Hodson, A.K.; Bloom, A.J.; Carter, M.R.; Cattaneo, A.; Chartres, C.J.; Hatfield, J.L.; Henry, K.; Hopmans, J.W.;
Horwath, W.R.; et al. Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: Scientific basis for action. Agric. Food Secur. 2014, 3, 1–39.
[CrossRef]
73. van Hilten, M.; Wolfert, S. 5G in agri-food-A review on current status, opportunities and challenges. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022,
201, 107291. [CrossRef]
74. Tian, F.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Wang, R.; Song, Z.; Yan, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, Z.; Yu, Z. Research on Navigation Path Extraction and Obstacle
Avoidance Strategy for Pusher Robot in Dairy Farm. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1008. [CrossRef]
75. Duzha, A.; Alexakis, E.; Kyriazis, D.; Sahi, L.F.; Kandi, M.A. From Data Governance by design to Data Governance as a Service: A
transformative human-centric data governance framework. In Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Cloud
and Big Data Computing, Manchester, UK, 17–19 August 2023; pp. 10–20.
76. Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. A novel model for data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future: A strategic roadmap to transformational
change in the era of big data. Future Cities Environ. 2021, 7, 3. [CrossRef]
77. Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Bai, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, C. Does Digital Technology Application Promote Carbon Emission Efficiency in Dairy
Farms? Evidence from China. Agriculture 2023, 13, 904. [CrossRef]
78. Ji, B.; Banhazi, T.; Phillips, C.J.; Wang, C.; Li, B. A machine learning framework to predict the next month’s daily milk yield, milk
composition and milking frequency for cows in a robotic dairy farm. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 216, 186–197. [CrossRef]
79. Cockburn, M. Application and prospective discussion of machine learning for the management of dairy farms. Animals 2020,
10, 1690. [CrossRef]
80. Krupitzer, C.; Stein, A. Unleashing the Potential of Digitalization in the Agri-Food Chain for Integrated Food Systems. Annu. Rev.
Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 15, 1–22. [CrossRef]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.