Case study analysis

Lea 101

The Problem Encountered by the Applicants of Philippine National Police

Submitted by:

Leaders:
FACINAG,JHOSWA .FALSIS,
LAINEFRED

Members:

DELA CRUZ, JODD 2.DELFIN, NATHANIEL O. PONCE, NILO U.,JR.

DEOCAMPO, HERALD PETERSON R. REMEGIO, JOHN REY M.

DEVELOS, RALPH JHAN M. ROXAS, GERMALYN

DIAZ, CYREL C. SALUNZON, RUSSEL J.

LOBERES, JERIC L. UADAN, GERARD ADRIAN R.

MILADO, MCJOVEN B. VALDERAMA, HERO M.

PARREÑAS, MARY JOY D. VALLES, BENCH MARK B.

PATRICIO, JASMIN B. VILLASOTO, VICTORIA B.

submitted to:

Ms.MischelleValle
Lea 101 instructor
 Case study analysis

Lea 101

The Problem Encountered by the Applicants of

Philippine National Police

1. Examining Disqualifications in the

Philippine National Police Backer System
I. Introduction

The recruitment process for law enforcement agencies is a critical component in ensuring the
selection of qualified and capable individuals. In the context of the Philippine National Police
(PNP), the Backer System has emerged as a distinctive mechanism within the recruitment
framework. This case study aims to delve into the nuances of the Backer System in PNP
applications, shedding light on its impact, challenges, and implications for both applicants and
the organization.

The Backer System in the PNP involves the endorsement or sponsorship of an applicant by a
designated supporter, often a high-ranking officer or a person of influence within the
organization. This system is designed to assess an applicant's character, credibility, and
potential contributions to the police force. Understanding the dynamics of the Backer System is
crucial for evaluating the fairness, transparency, and effectiveness of the overall recruitment
process.

The recruitment process of the Philippine National Police (PNP) plays a pivotal role in selecting
individuals who will uphold the values and standards of law enforcement. Within this
framework, the Backer System has become a significant aspect, introducing both opportunities
and challenges. This case study aims to investigate and analyze the problems associated with
the Backer System from the perspective of applicants, delving into their experiences and the
implications for the fairness and integrity of the recruitment process

II. Background of the study

The Philippine National Police (PNP) serves as a critical institution in maintaining law and order,
with its recruitment process being a key determinant of the organization's effectiveness. The
incorporation of the Backer System into this recruitment process introduces a unique dynamic
where applicants are endorsed or sponsored by influential figures within the PNP. While
intended to assess an applicant's character and potential contributions, the system has
encountered challenges that have sparked concerns regarding fairness, transparency, and the
overall integrity of the recruitment process.

The backdrop of this case study lies in the growing scrutiny and reported problems associated
with the Backer System. Applicants navigating the recruitment process have raised issues
related to favoritism, bias, and a lack of transparency, which have the potential to compromise
the merit-based principles that underpin the selection process. The Backer System, in its
implementation, has become a focal point of discussion, prompting the need for a
comprehensive examination of the experiences and challenges faced by applicants.

As the PNP plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and public safety, understanding and
addressing these challenges within the Backer System become imperative. This case study
seeks to uncover the systemic issues, analyze their impact on the fairness of the recruitment
process, and offer recommendations for improvements. By delving into the background and
nuances of the Backer System problems, the research aims to contribute valuable insights that
can inform policy discussions and foster positive changes within the PNP's recruitment
framework.

III. Foreign study and Local study

This foreign study explores the utilization of Backer Systems or similar patronage-based
mechanisms in law enforcement recruitment globally, drawing parallels and contrasts with the
case of the Philippine National Police (PNP). Understanding how other countries handle similar
systems can offer insights into potential challenges, best practices, and innovative solutions.

Various law enforcement agencies worldwide employ sponsorship or endorsement systems,

akin to the Backer System in the PNP. The study aims to investigate the experiences and issues
faced by applicants in these international contexts, shedding light on the impact of patronage
on fairness, transparency, and the overall integrity of recruitment processes.This local study
focuses specifically on the Backer System within the recruitment process of the Philippine
National Police (PNP). It seeks to comprehensively explore the challenges faced by applicants,
emphasizing the Philippine context and delving into the nuances of patronage, nepotism, and
potential reforms.The PNP's Backer System has been a subject of scrutiny, with reported issues
of favoritism and bias. This study aims to delve into the experiences of applicants, the systemic
challenges they encounter, and the impact on the overall fairness and transparency of the
PNP's recruitment process.

VI. Objective of the study

The objective of a case study about the Backer System problems in the Philippine National
Police (PNP) is to comprehensively investigate and analyze the challenges faced by applicants
within this specific recruitment process. The study aims to achieve the following objectives:

 Identify Systemic Issues: Explore and document the systemic challenges associated with
the Backer System in the PNP recruitment. Identify patterns of favoritism, bias, or other
issues that may impact the fairness and transparency of the recruitment process.
 Analyze Applicant Experiences:Examine the firsthand experiences of applicants involved
in the Backer System, focusing on challenges encountered during the recruitment
process. Understand how the involvement of backers influences the overall applicant
experience.
 Assess Impact on Fairness:Evaluate how the challenges within the Backer System impact
the fairness and meritocracy of the PNP recruitment process.
 Investigate whether disparities exist in the treatment of applicants based on the
involvement of backers
 Examine Organizational Implications: Explore how the challenges within the Backer
System influence internal dynamics of the PNP, including morale, perceptions of
fairness, and organizational culture. Assess whether the current system contributes to a
healthy and effective work environment.
 Propose Recommendations for Improvement: Based on the identified challenges,
provide recommendations for reforms or improvements to enhance the fairness,
transparency, and effectiveness of the PNP's Backer System. Suggest potential policy
changes or procedural adjustments to address the systemic issues.
  Contribute to Policy Discussions: Offer insights and findings that can contribute to local
policy discussions within the PNP and potentially guide reforms in the recruitment
process.Provide a basis for informed decision-making by relevant authorities in
addressing challenges associated with the Backer System.
 Enhance Understanding of Backer System Dynamics: Increase understanding of the
dynamics and implications of the Backer System in the PNP, considering its impact on
applicant selection and organizational outcomes. Provide a nuanced perspective that
can inform future research and discussions on law enforcement recruitment practices.
 Maintain Ethical Considerations:Prioritize ethical considerations to ensure participant
confidentiality and uphold the integrity of the research process. Safeguard the
anonymity of applicants and backers interviewed during the study.
 By achieving these objectives, the case study aims to contribute valuable insights that
can inform policy discussions, promote transparency, and support efforts to address
challenges within the Backer System in the Philippine National Police recruitment
process.

V. Purpose of the study

The purpose of a case study about the Backer System problems in the Philippine National Police
(PNP) is to provide a thorough and detailed examination of the challenges faced by applicants
within this specific recruitment process. The study serves several purposes:

Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the Backer System, exploring its intricacies,

implementation, and impact on the overall recruitment process of the PNP. Identify and
document systemic issues associated with the Backer System, such as favoritism, bias, or lack of
transparency, that may affect the fairness and integrity of the recruitment process.

Investigate and understand the firsthand experiences of applicants navigating the Backer
System, shedding light on challenges they encounter and their perceptions of the process.
Assess how the challenges within the Backer System influence the fairness, meritocracy, and
equal opportunities for applicants in the PNP recruitment. Examine how the Backer System
dynamics impact internal organizational factors, including morale, perception of fairness, and
organizational culture within the PNP.

Offer insights and recommendations based on the identified challenges, aiming to contribute to
the ongoing efforts to reform and improve the PNP's recruitment process. Contribute valuable
information and findings to local policy discussions within the PNP, informing decision-makers
and stakeholders about the issues associated with the Backer System.

Provide evidence and data to support evidence-based decision-making in addressing challenges

within the Backer System, ensuring that reforms are grounded in a thorough understanding of
the issues. Increase public awareness and understanding of the Backer System's complexities
and its potential impact on the fairness and transparency of law enforcement recruitment.

Advocate for transparency and accountability in the recruitment process, encouraging open
dialogue and discussions about potential improvements to ensure a fair and impartial
system.Contribute to the academic knowledge base by providing a detailed case study that can
serve as a reference for researchers, scholars, and policymakers interested in law enforcement
recruitment practices.

By fulfilling these purposes, the case study aims to be a valuable resource that contributes to
ongoing discussions, reforms, and improvements in the recruitment process of the Philippine
National Police, particularly in addressing challenges associated with the Backer System.

VI. Conclusion

In conclusion, the case study on the Backer System problems in the Philippine National Police
(PNP) sheds light on significant challenges within the recruitment process, emphasizing the
complexities associated with patronage and its impact on fairness, transparency, and the
overall integrity of applicant selection. The findings and analysis reveal crucial insights that
contribute to the understanding of systemic issues and potential avenues for improvement.the
Backer System problems within the Philippine National Police recruitment process present a
multifaceted issue with far-reaching consequences. This case study not only provides a
comprehensive analysis of the challenges but also serves as a call to action for stakeholders to
collaborate on implementing reforms. By addressing the identified issues, the PNP can foster a
more transparent, fair, and equitable recruitment process, thereby reinforcing public trust and
the integrity of law enforcement in the Philippines.

VII. Recommendation

Based on the findings of the case study on the Backer System problems in the Philippine
National Police (PNP), the following recommendations are proposed to address the identified
challenges and improve the overall fairness, transparency, and effectiveness of the recruitment
process:

Review and Revise Backer System Criteria: Conduct a comprehensive review of the criteria and
processes associated with the Backer System. Establish clear guidelines to ensure that the
system focuses on merit-based principles, minimizing potential biases or favoritism.

Enhance Transparency and Communication: Implement measures to enhance transparency

throughout the recruitment process. Communicate the criteria and selection process clearly to
applicants, ensuring they have a better understanding of how the Backer System operates.

Establish an Oversight Committee: Create an independent oversight committee tasked with

monitoring and evaluating the Backer System's implementation. This committee should include
representatives from diverse backgrounds to ensure impartiality.

Introduce Anonymous Application Process: Consider introducing an anonymous application

process, where initial assessments are made without knowledge of the applicant's backer. This
helps mitigate potential biases during the initial stages of the recruitment process.

Implement Regular Training on Fair Recruitment Practices: Provide training for PNP officials
involved in the recruitment process, emphasizing fair and unbiased practices. Incorporate
modules that address potential challenges related to the Backer System.

Establish an Appeals Mechanism: Create a formal appeals mechanism for applicants who feel
they have been unfairly treated or disadvantaged within the recruitment process. Ensure that
the appeals process is transparent and accessible.
Promote Diversity and Inclusion: Develop strategies to promote diversity within the PNP,
considering factors beyond Backer System endorsements. Implement measures to attract
applicants from various backgrounds, ensuring a more inclusive representation within the
organization.

Regularly Assess and Adjust Policies: Establish a routine system for assessing the effectiveness
of implemented reforms Be open to adjusting policies and procedures based on ongoing
evaluations and feedback from stakeholders.

By implementing these recommendations, the PNP can work towards creating a recruitment
process that upholds principles of fairness, transparency, and equal opportunity for all
applicants, addressing the challenges associated with the Backer System.

VIII. Reference

https://work.chron.com/disqualifications-getting-job-police-department-19454.htmlhttps://
www.google.com/search?
q=for+factors+that+disqualified+applicants+of+police+officer&oq=&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCQg
BECMYJxjqAjIHCAAQRRixATIJCAEQIxgnGOoCMgkIAhAjGCcY6gIyCQgDECMYJxjqAjIJCAQQIxgnGO
oCMgkIBRAjGCcY6gIyCQgGECMYJxjqAjIJCAcQIxgnGOoCMgkICBAjGCcY6gIyCQgJECMYJxjqAjIJCA
oQIxgnGOoCMgkICxAjGCcY6gIyCQgMECMYJxjqAjIJCA0QIxgnGOoCMgkIDhAjGCcY6gIyEQgPEAAY
AxhCGI8BGLQCGOoCMhEIEBAAGAMYQhiPARi0AhjqAjIRCBEQABgDGEIYjwEYtAIY6gIyEQgSEAAY
AxhCGI8BGLQCGOoCMhEIExAAGAMYQhiPARi0AhjqAtIBBi0xajBqN6gCE7ACAQ&client=ms-
android-oppo-rvo2&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8https://www.sagepub.com/sites/
default/files/upm-binaries/53256_ch_4.pdfhttps://legal-explanations.com/blog/what-
disqualifies-you-from-being-a-police-officer/