CRPC 3
CRPC 3
The criminal justice system can have far-reaching effects on an individual’s life, most significantly
affecting their right to life and freedom. Since courts, like any other man-made organisation, are likely to
make mistakes, it follows that the judgements they make are also subject to this risk of making errors. In
order to prevent a serious miscarriage of justice, there should be procedures in place to carefully review
the rulings of subordinate courts. To account for this, certain measures have been incorporated into the
criminal procedure for appealing a criminal court’s judgement or order. From Section 372 all the way up
to Section 394 of the Criminal Procedure Code are detailed requirements regarding appeals.
However, the opportunity to appeal is not always available. For this reason, even in circumstances where
the right of appeal has been limited by CrPC, the lawmakers integrated the concept of a review procedure
termed “revision” into the legislative process to entirely preclude any miscarriage of justice. The higher
courts’ revision powers and the method for exercising those powers are laid forth in Sections 397 to 405.
These authorities are wide-ranging and ad hoc, which should be taken into account.
While litigants are guaranteed the opportunity to appeal in most circumstances, criminal courts have wide
latitude in deciding whether or not to grant a motion for rehearing, therefore revision is not a guaranteed
legal right. Legally, an accused person has the right to at least one appeal in criminal proceedings but no
such recourse in situations of revision. The distinction between an appeal and a revision has been
revisited numerous times in court. According to the Supreme Court’s decision in Hari Shankar v. Rao
Ghari Chowdhury (1963), “the distinction between an appeal and a revision is a real one. Unless the
statute that grants the right of appeal specifies otherwise, a rehearing on appeal includes a rehearing on
both the law and the facts. In most cases, a higher court has the authority to review a previous ruling to
ensure that the original decision was made in accordance with the law.”
claims that the jury’s judgement should be overturned because it was arbitrary or not supported
by the evidence,
the judge made an error in interpreting the law, or
there was a miscarriage of justice.
If an appeal is filed, the court can do just about anything with it. The court may uphold the conviction,
overturn the conviction, substitute a judgement of acquittal, or order a new trial. Even if the court rules in
the appellant’s favour on a technicality of the law, it may nonetheless decide to throw out the appeal if it
determines that there was no serious miscarriage of justice. The Director of Public Prosecutions may also
file an appeal with the Court of Appeal, requesting that the Court of Appeal quash an acquittal and retry
the case, or file an appeal against an interlocutory judgement.
Subsequent appeals
A person who has been found guilty at trial may, with the approval of the Court of Appeal, make a second
or subsequent appeal. An individual seeking permission to appeal must convince the court that new and
persuasive evidence exists and should be taken into account. If the court believes there was a significant
miscarriage of justice, it may hear a new appeal, overturn the conviction, and either substitute a
judgement of acquittal or order a new trial.
Kinds of appeal
Section 373 CrPC – Appeal in court of session
In the event that a person has been ordered to offer security for the purpose of maintaining the peace or
for good behaviour, an appeal against the order may be filed with the Court of Session in accordance with
Section 117.
Where a person has been wronged by any order refusing to accept or reject a surety, the person may seek
redress under Section 121.
Section 379 CrPC- Appeal against conviction by High Court in certain cases
If a person’s acquittal by the high court is overturned and he is subsequently convicted and sentenced to
death, life in prison, or a term of imprisonment of 10 years or more, the accused may appeal to the
Supreme Court.
Non-appealable cases
Section 375 CrPC- Certain guilty pleas are non-appealable
No appeal shall lie if the defendant enters a plea of guilty before the high court and the court records such
a plea and finds the defendant guilty.
If the defendant enters a guilty plea in a lower court, an appeal of the sentence may be made to the high
court.
There is a right to appeal a sentence based on:
7. The totality of the punishment.
8. The sentencing process was followed per the law.
Section 376 CrPC- No appeal in petty cases
Petty misdemeanours shall not be subject to appeal. The procedures for handling petty matters vary by
jurisdiction. The following are examples of minor offences:
In the instance of the High Court, the possible penalties include either imprisonment for up to 6
months or a fine of up to Rs 1000, or both.
Up to three months in jail time, a Rs. 200 fine, or both if found guilty in court of session.
Up to 3 months in jail, or a fine of Rs. 200, whichever is greater, if prosecuted by a metropolitan
magistrate.
There is a Rs 100 fine if you are caught breaking a law in front of a judicial magistrate.
Up to Rs. 200 in the instance of a Magistrate authorised under Section 260 of the Criminal
Procedure Code.
Important judgements
Dhananjay Rai v. State of Bihar (2022)
The bench consisting of Abhay S. Oka and MM Sundresh, JJ., decided that an appeal against conviction
that was filed by an accused under Sub-Section (2) of Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973, cannot be dismissed on the ground that the accused is absconding. This decision was made in order
to further the cause of criminal justice.
The accused was found guilty by the Sessions Court on September 4, 2009, and the charges against him
were brought under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), as well as Section 27(1) of
the Arms Act of 1959. The accused person took their case to the High Court in Patna, where they filed an
appeal. After some time, it was determined that he had vanished. The appeal against conviction was
thrown out by a division bench of the Patna High Court on August 25, 2015, for the sole reason that the
accused had vanished without a trace, without any consideration being given to the validity of the appeal.
The High Court ruled that even though the right to appeal is substantial, the appellant lost his right to do
so the minute he misused the legal process by evading capture. The appellant’s conduct here constitutes
willful resistance to the criminal justice system.
But the Supreme Court did not agree with the High Court’s method when the High Court acknowledged
that it was departing from the established position of law.
The Court stated that the High Court’s distress about the appellant’s boldness in evading justice by
fleeing the jurisdiction is understandable. Non-prosecution is not a valid reason to ignore the merits of a
previously granted appeal of a conviction.
As a result, the Court reversed the challenged verdict and sent the case back to the High Court to be heard
again on its merits.
As the appeal is from 2009 and challenges a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, the
Court has stated that it should be given the utmost attention in being resolved. The Court ruled that “if the
appeal could not be heard within a reasonable time, in that situation, the appellant will have to be
allowed the liberty to seek suspension of sentence” and asked the High Court to consider the appeal as
soon as practicable, ideally within six months.
Appellate court
The jurisdiction of an appellate court is laid out in detail under Section 386 of the Criminal Procedure
Code. Although the appellate court has the jurisdiction to dismiss an appeal summarily, it will only do so
if the appeal has not been dismissed under Section 384. In accordance with Section 386 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, the Appellate Court may dismiss the appeal if it finds that there is insufficient cause for
interfering with the order under appeal.
If the appellate court hasn’t already ruled out the appeal for the reasons stated, it might:
9. Reverse the lower court’s acquittal decision and remand the matter for further investigation, a
new trial, or commitment, as appropriate; or find the defendant guilty and impose the appropriate
punishment;
10. Reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused, or order him to be retried
by a Court of competent jurisdiction subordinate to such Appellate Court, or commit him for trial,
or alter the finding, maintaining the sentence, or with or without altering the finding, alter the
nature or the extent, or the nature and extent of the sentence, but not so as to enhance the same in
an appeal from a conviction;
11. Reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused or order him to be retried by
a Court competent to try the offence; Alter the finding maintaining the sentence; Alter the nature,
the extent, or both, of the sentence, so as to enhance or reduce the same; With or without altering
the finding, alter the nature, the extent, or both;
12. Modification or reversal of any prior order pending appeal;
13. Make any adjustment or order that is necessary or appropriate to the punishment; Provided,
however, that the sentence shall not be increased unless the accused has been given a chance to
show cause against such increase.
Further, the Appellate Court shall not impose on the defendant a greater penalty than that imposed by the
court that issued the order or sentence that is the subject of the appeal. Regarding an appeal that has arisen
from an order of conviction, Section 386(b) provides the Appellate Court with extensive powers, and the
Appellate Court has the authority to even acquit a person who has been found guilty of an offence by the
trial court.
According to Section 386 of the Criminal Procedure Code, a person who has been convicted has the right
to appeal their case, and the Appellate Court has the authority to, while the appeal is pending, order that
the execution of the sentence or order that is being appealed against be suspended, and also, if the person
is in confinement, that they be released on bail or on their own bond.
Conclusion
An appeal does not result in a new trial. In order to evaluate whether there are sufficient grounds to grant
the appeal, the appellate court instead reviews the record of the lower court’s proceedings. A complete
transcript of the trial as well as all pre and post-trial motions are included in the record. Appellate courts
don’t just look at the evidence presented in the trial; they also read the briefs the parties submit. Appellate
briefs provide context for the arguments made in an appeal and lay out the relevant legal issues at stake.
Since it was created by legislation, the appellate court’s authority and jurisdiction must be defined within
the confines of the law. At the same time, an appeals court is a “court of error,” the purpose of which is to
revise the lower court’s ruling if it was incorrect, and its jurisdiction should be identical to that of the
lower court. It should not and cannot perform an action that the lower court lacked jurisdiction to execute.
Similarly, in circumstances where the trial for conviction was not held in the High Court, the State
Government has the authority to direct the Public Prosecutor to file an appeal against the sentence on the
grounds of inadequacy with either the session’s court or the High Court. Neither the victims nor the
complainants nor anybody else has been afforded the opportunity to file an appeal challenging their
sentences on the grounds that they are inadequate. In addition, the court must provide the defendant with
a fair opportunity to present arguments against any proposed sentence enhancement. The defendant has
the right to show cause in order to be exonerated or have his sentence reduced.
INTRODUCTION
The process of criminal justice has some serious consequences on an individual’s life, primarily on the
right to life and personal liberty. Each and every institution built by humans is prone to fallibility,
therefore, this applies to the decisions rendered by courts as well. Resultantly, there should be specific
provisions in place so as to scrutinise the decisions of lower courts in order to obviate the scope of
miscarriage of justice. Realizing this aspect, there are certain provisions which have been included in the
criminal procedure on appeal against a judgment or order of criminal courts. CrPC contains elaborate
provisions on appeals starting from Section 372 to Section 394.
Howbeit, there are certain cases in which there is no right to appeal. The legislators bore this in mind and
incorporated the concept of review procedure called revision in the legislature so as to completely avoid
any miscarriage of justice for even those cases where the right of appeal has been barred by CrPC.
Section 397 to Section 405 include the powers of revision granted to the higher courts, and the procedure
to exercise these powers. It must be noted that these powers are extensive as well as discretionary by their
very nature.
In a general sense, appeal is a legal right conferred upon parties, however, revision completely depends
on the discretion of a criminal court, which means that it is not a right as such. In criminal cases, at least
one appeal is granted to an accused by the legislature, whereas there is no such right in instances of
revision. In fact, the courts have many times discussed the difference between an appeal and a revision. In
the case of Hari Shankar vs Rao Ghari Chowdhury[1], the Supreme Court held that “the distinction
between an appeal and a revision is a real one. A right of appeal carries with it a right of rehearing on law
as well as fact, unless the statute conferring the right of appeal limits the rehearing in some way as. The
power to hear a revision is generally given to a superior Court so that it may satisfy itself that a particular
case has been decided according to law.”
APPEAL
The word “appeal” has not been defined in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter CrPC),
however, it can be described as the judicial examination of a decision, given by a lower court, by a higher
court. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines appeal as “a legal proceeding by which a case is brought
before a higher court for review of the decision of a lower court”.[2]
It needs to be pointed out that except for the statutory provisions laid down by CrPC or any other law
which is in force, an appeal cannot lie from any judgment or an order of a criminal court.[3] Thus, there is
no vested right to appeal as such as even the first appeal will be subjected to statutory limitations. The
justification behind this principle is that the courts which try a case are competent enough with the
presumption that the trial has been conducted fairly. However, as per the proviso[4], the victim[5] has a
right to appeal against any order passed by the Court under special circumstances comprising of a
judgment of acquittal, conviction for lesser offence or inadequate compensation.
In the case of Satya Pal Sigh vs State of Madhya Pradesh[6], the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the
father of the deceased has a locus standi to present an appeal to the High Court under the proviso of
Section 372, as he falls within the definition of “victim”, to question the correctness of judgment and
order of an acquittal of accused.
Generally, same sets of rules and procedures are employed to govern the appeals in the Sessions
Courts[7] and High Courts (highest court of appeal in a state and enjoys more powers in matters where
appeal is permissible). The highest court of appeal in the country is the Supreme Court and hence, it
enjoys the most extensive discretionary and plenary powers in the cases of appeals. Its powers are largely
governed by the provisions laid down in CrPC, Indian Constitution, and the Supreme Court (Enlargement
of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction), 1970.
The law provides a person who has been convicted of a crime to appeal to the Supreme Court or the High
Court or the Sessions Court as per the circumstances.[8] In the case of Arun Kumar vs. State of Uttar
Pradesh[9], the Honourable Supreme Court held that if the High Court found that the view taken by the
Sessions Judge to acquit the appellants was manifestly wrong, moreover, it even led to miscarriage of
justice, therefore, the High Court was correct in setting aside this acquittal and convicting them.
The State Government has been empowered to direct the Public Prosecutor to appeal against the sentence
on the grounds of inadequacy to either the sessions court or the High Court, however in only those cases
where the trial for conviction has not been held by the High Court.[10] This shows that this right to
appeal against sentences on the grounds of inadequacy has not been granted to the victims or the
complainants or any other person. Moreover, it is mandatory for the Court to give the accused a
reasonable opportunity to show cause against any enhancement of the sentence in the interest of justice.
The accused has the right to plead for his acquittal or a reduction in the sentence while showing cause.
Similarly, the District Magistrate, and the State Government have the powers to direct the Public
Prosecutor to present an appeal in case of an acquittal to Court of Sessions, and the High Court,
respectively, subject to certain conditions.[11] A two-Judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court held in
the case of Satya Pal Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh[12] that the victim cannot file an appeal against
an order of acquittal without obtaining the leave of the High Court.
The accused has been given the right to appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment of the High
Court if the High Court has reversed an order of his acquittal on appeal by convicting him, thereby,
sentencing him to imprisonment for life or for ten years or more, or to death.[13] Understanding the
relevance of a criminal appeal being made to the Supreme Court, the same law has also been laid down in
Article 134(1) of the Indian Constitution under the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The
Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970, has also been passed by the
legislature in consonance with Article 134(2) of the Indian Constitution to confer additional powers on
the Supreme Court to entertain and hear appeals from the High Court under certain conditions.
A similar right to appeal has been granted to one or all accused persons if more than one persons have
been convicted in a trial and such order has been passed by the court.[14]
However, there are certain circumstances under which no appeal shall lie. These provisions have been
laid down under Section 265G[15], Section 375[16] and Section 376[17] of the CrPC.
As to the finality of the judgments and orders passed on appeal, CrPC makes them final except in some
cases.[18] This shows how paramount importance is given to appeals.
REVISION
The word “revision” has not been defined in CrPC, however, as per Section 397 of CrPC, the High Court
or any Sessions Judge have been empowered to call for and examine the records of any proceeding satisfy
oneself:
14. as to the correctness, legality, or propriety of any finding, sentence or order, whether recorded or
passed, and
15. as to the regularity of any proceedings of an inferior court.
Moreover, they have the powers to direct the execution of any sentence or an order to be suspended. Not
just this, but to even direct to release the accused on bail or on his own bond if the accused is in
confinement. They may even order an inquiry subject to certain limitations.[19] It is clearly evident that
the appellant courts have been granted such powers so as to obviate any failure of justice.
The Honourable Supreme Court of India, in the context of this provision, held in the case of Amit Kapoor
vs Ramesh Chander & Anr[20] that “the revisional jurisdiction can be invoked where the decisions under
challenge are grossly erroneous, there is no compliance with the provisions of law, the finding recorded is
based on no evidence, material evidence is ignored or judicial discretion is exercised arbitrarily or
perversely.” The same Court, further explaining this provision, held in the case of State Of Rajasthan vs
Fatehkaran Mehdu[21] that “the object of this provision is to set right a patent defect or an error of
jurisdiction or law or the perversity which has crept in the proceeding.”
The High Court has the power to take up a revision petition on its own motion i.e. suo moto or on the
petition by an aggrieved party or any other party. The Allahabad High Court held in the case of Faruk @
Gaffar vs State Of U.P.[22] that “whenever the matter is brought to the notice of the Court and the Court
is satisfied that in the facts and circumstances of the case, a case is made out for exercising the revisional
powers suo motu, it can always do so in the interest of justice.”
There are certain statutory limitations that have been imposed on the High Court for exercising its
revisional powers as per Section 401 of CrPC, however the only statutory requirement to exercise this
power is that the records of the proceedings are presented before it, after which it is solely the discretion
of the Court:
16. An accused is to be given due opportunity to hear him and on order cannot be passed unless this
is followed.
17. In instances where a person has forwarded a revisional application assuming that an appeal did
not lie in such a case, the High Court has to treat such application as an appeal in the interests of
justice.
18. An application of revision cannot be proceeded with if it has been filed by a party where the party
could have appealed but did not go for it.
The High Court, as well as the Sessions Court, may call for record of any proceeding of any inferior
criminal Court situated within its jurisdiction for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness,
legality of propriety of any finding, sentence, etc. Thus, the Sessions Judge could examine the question in
relation to the inadequacy of sentence in view of the powers conferred on him by Section 397(1) of CrPC.
[23]
The difference between the powers of the High Court and the Sessions Court being that the Sessions
Judge can only exercise revisional powers which he has called for by himself, whereas the High Court has
the power to take up a revisional matter by itself or when it is brought to its knowledge. The powers of a
Sessions Court are the same as that of the High Court while dealing with revisional cases. The Madras
High Court in the case S. Balasubramaninan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu[24] held that “a Sessions Judge
can entertain an application in revision against sentence and enhance the sentence in revision in certain
cases.” It has also been previously held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case Alamgir vs State of
Bihar[25] that “in respect of enhancement of sentence in revision the enhancement can be made only if
the Court is satisfied the sentence imposed by the trial Court is unduly lenient, or that in passing the order
of sentence, the trial court has manifestly failed to consider the relevant facts”
CONCLUSION
It can thus be clearly seen that through the process of appeals, a person gets an opportunity to get any
legal, or factual error in an order or judgment corrected. Nevertheless, appeals against any judgment, or
order, or sentence of a criminal court can only be preferred when it has been specifically provided in the
statutes. Thus, the right to appeal can only be exercised within the limits laid down by CrPC or any other
law which is in force and hence, this is a constricted right. As far as the decision to appeal is considered,
it is discretionary except in cases when an accused person has been sentenced to death by Sessions Court.
Not only this, there are certain cases as well in which appeal is not allowed at all, in fact the judgment, or
order, or sentence delivered by the criminal court will attain finality.
Moreover, there is no doubt that the revisional jurisdiction of the High Court is quiet extensive. In fact, it
can be said that no form of any judicial injustice can permeate through this power. It has been held in
various decisions that the High Court is allowed to exercise it inherent powers when dealing with cases of
revision. These inherent powers apply to both substantive as well as procedural matters. However, it
cannot re-examine any evidence.
Introduction
“Hate the crime and not the criminal”. You might have heard this a zillion times. This means that we need
to eliminate crime and for this the elimination of criminals is not required. The Criminal Law in India is
more into reforming offenders rather than punishing them. It is true that punishment gives a sense of
satisfaction to the society as well as to the victim, but this does not reform the criminals. Especially in the
cases of imprisonment, once the person is out of prison, he is back to his old ways of infringement of
rights. This is common in the cases of youth criminals. Their minds are not mature and get diverted when
engaged with several criminals in jail.
Thus, instead of keeping the accused with hardened criminals in jail, the court may order personal
freedom on the basis of good behaviour. The court can also grant a supervision period for the accused.
The main aim behind the Probation of Offender Act, 1958 is to give an opportunity to offenders to reform
themselves rather than turning into hardened criminals. Section 562 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure,1898 (after amendment it stands as Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973)
provides that any person not below twenty-one years of age who may have not been convicted for an
offence for imprisonment up to seven years or not convicted to death or imprisonment of life can be
released on the basis of probation for good conduct.
The Act is based on a reformative approach which has come over the years from the Doctrine of
Deterrence. It has been observed that the offender’s readjustment in society decreases after the release.
They might also face problems while working with professional delinquents. This creates an undesired
impact on the convicted and his/her life afterwards. The Probation of Offender Act, 1958 saves minor
offenders from becoming regular criminals. This is done by providing them with a chance to reform
themselves rather than getting into prison. The probation officer amicably reaches to the needs and
difficulties of the accused and tries to solve the problem. This is done for the person convicted of minor
crimes.
The Probation Officer is the key human being in the process of Probation management. He contacts the
Probationer directly. He is responsible for upholding the provisions of the court’s probation order. He
carries out two primary functions which consist of the Probation offender presentence investigation and
supervision of the offender. The Probation of Offender Act, 1958 aims at providing the release of the
accused if he has been found not guilty of an offence not punishable with death or life imprisonment after
due admonition. It has been enacted to provide the offenders with an opportunity to prove that they can
improve their behaviour and can live in a society without harming them.
It is also to be kept in mind that reformation doesn’t always work. Sometimes the crimes are so heinous
and abhorrent and the criminals are so unrepentant that punishment of such crimes is important. For some
cases, reformation is not useful and punishment is best to safeguard the society by locking them for life.
Admonition
Section 3 of the Probation of the Offenders Act,1958 deals with the power of court to release the offender
after admonition. An Admonition, in literal terms, means a firm warning or reprimand. Section 3 says
how the offender is benefited on the basis of admonition after satisfying the following conditions:
When any person is found guilty of committing an offence under Section 379 or Section 380 or
Section 381 or Section 404 or Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 or any offence
punishable with imprisonment for not more than two years, or with fine, or with both, under the
Indian Penal Code, or any other law
An offender should not previously be convicted for the same offence.
The Court considers the nature of the offence and the character of the offender.
The Court may release the offender on probation of good conduct applying Section 4 of the Act,
instead of sentencing him.and,
The Court may release the offender after due admonition, instead of sentencing him.
Case laws
22. Keshav Sitaram Sali v. The State of Maharashtra, AIR 1983 SC 291 – In this case, the appellant
was an employee of the Railways at the Paldhi Railway Station. He abetted the execution of a
charcoal theft crime committed by Bhikan Murad in the case before the Special Judicial
Magistrate First Class (Railways), Bhusawal, on the charges of charcoal stealing. The learned
Magistrate acquitted the appellant of that crime, and the State Government filed an appeal before
the Bombay High Court against the acquittal judgment passed by the learned Magistrate. He was
charged with a fine of Rs. 500 and in default of payment, rigorous imprisonment for two months.
The subject matter of theft was a quantity of coal valued at Rs. 8. The Supreme Court held that in
case of minor thefts, the High Court should extend the benefit of Section 3 or Section 4 of the
Probation of Offenders Act,1958 or Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 rather
than imposing fines.
23. Basikesan v. The State of Orissa, AIR 1967 Ori 4 – In this case, a 20-year-old was found guilty of
an offence under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code,1860. It was held that the youth had
committed the offence not deliberately and so the case must be applied for Section 3 of the
Probation Act and be released after admonition.
24. Ahmed v. The State of Rajasthan, AIR 1967 Raj 190 – In this case, the court said that the benefit
of the Probation of the Offenders Act does not extend to anyone who has indulged in any activity
that resulted in an explosive situation leading to communal tension.
Probation on good conduct
Section 4 of the Probation of the Offenders Act,1958 talks about the release of the offender on the basis
of good conduct. It is a very important Section of the Act. The important points that must be remembered
for the application of this Section are:
Section 4 of the Act is not applicable if the offender is found guilty of an offence with death or
imprisonment for life.
The Court has to consider the circumstances of the case including the nature of the offence and
the character of the offender.
The court may pass a supervision order to release the offender on probation of good conduct. The
supervisory period is not to be shorter than one year. The probation officer must supervise the
individual for such a span in such a situation. In the supervisory order, the name of the probation
officer should be listed.
The Court can direct the offender to execute a bond, with or without sureties, to appear and
receive sentence when called upon during such period which should not exceed a period of three
years. The court may release the offender on good behaviour.
The Court may put appropriate conditions in the supervision order and the court making a
supervision order explain to the offender the terms and conditions of the order. Such supervision
order should forthwith be furnished to the offender.
Probation officer’s report is not compulsory to enforce this rule, but if the information is required
on record, the Court shall take into account the probation officer’s information before granting a
probation order for good behaviour.
Case laws
25. Smt. Devki v. The State of Haryana, AIR 1979 SC 1948 – In this case, it was observed that
Section 4 would not be extended to the abominable culprit who was found guilty of abducting a
teenage girl and forcing her to sexual submission with a commercial motive.
26. Dalbir Singh v. The State of Haryana, AIR 2000 SC 1677 – In this case, the court took the
opinion that it is appropriate for the defendant to be placed on probation for his good conduct,
given that the facts of the situation are needed to be taken into account. One of the circumstances
informing the aforementioned opinion which cannot be omitted is “the essence of the offence.”
Thus, Section 4 can be redressed where the court recognizes the circumstances of the situation, in
particular the “character of the crime,” when the court decides whether it is reasonable and
necessary for the execution of a defined reason that the defendant should be released on the
grounds of good conduct.
27. Phul Singh v. the State of Haryana, AIR 1980 SC 249 – In this case, the court held that the
provision of Section 4 should not be mistaken and applied easily in undeserving cases where a
person in early twenties commits rape. The court, thus, refused the application of probation on
such heinous nature of crime and convicted the person.
Cost and compensation
Section 5 of the Probation of the Offenders Act, 1958 says that if any person is released under Section 3
or Section 4 of this Act, even then the court might order:
The offender to pay compensation to the victim for the loss or the injury occurred to him. Or
Cost of the proceeding as the court may think reasonable.
Case laws
28. Rajeshwari Prasad v. Ram Babu Gupta, AIR 1961 Pat 19 – The amount of compensation is
purely on the discretion of the court to grant if it thinks it is reasonable in the case. Thus, deciding
the amount of compensation, it is solely the court’s discretion to require payment and costs where
it finds.
In cases where the accused is below 21 years of age, the Court shall call for the report of the
Probation Officer. If the court’s opinion is not desirable with offender either on the ground of
admonition (Section 3) or on the ground of release on probation of good conduct (Section 4), the
Court can pass sentence of imprisonment on the offender who is under 21 of years ago but the
Court cannot sentence him without recording reasons for doing so. The Court has an obligation to
see whether Section 3 or 4 of the Act applies or not. For this purpose, the Court must call for the
report of the Probation Officer. Therefore, the report of the Probation Officer is mandatory when
the offender is under 21 years of age.
The court considers the nature of the offence and the character, physical and mental condition of
the offender before making any decision.
It is difficult for the court to come to a conclusion whether Section 3 or Section 4 applies or not
unless the Court considers the report of the Probation Officer, therefore, the report of the
Probation Officer is mandatory under Section 6 of the Act.
On receiving a report, the Court peruses it and decides whether the offender can be released on
admonition or probation of good conduct or not.
After receiving the report, if the court orders that the offender shall not be released, applying
Section 3 or Section 4 of the Act, the Court can pass sentence to the offender recording the
reasons for doing so.
Case laws
29. Daulat Ram v. The State of Haryana 1972 SC 2434 – In this case, it was held that the aim of this
Section was to protect the youth. The juvenile offenders would not be sent to jail if their crime
was not as serious as to punish them with life imprisonment or death. Therefore, the provision
should be liberally construed keeping in view the spirit embodied therein.
30. Ramji Nissar v. The State of Bihar; AIR 1963 SC 1088 – In this case, the Supreme Court observed
that the object of the Act, 1958 is to prevent the turning of youthful offenders into criminals by
their association with hardened criminals of mature age within the walls of a prison. The method
adopted is to attempt their possible reformation instead of inflicting on them the normal
punishment for their crimes. The person’s age problem is important not for the purpose of
assessing his or her guilt, but rather for the purpose of punishing the crime for which he or she is
found guilty. Consequently, if a court determines that the defendant was not under the age of 21
on the day the court found him guilty, Section 6 does not apply.
Report of probation officers
Section 7 of the Probation of the Offenders Act,1958 deals with the clause that the report of the probating
officer is kept confidential. No Probation Officer’s report is necessary to apply Section 4 of the Probation
of Offenders Act but such report is must under Section 6 of Probation of Offenders Act if the offender is
under 21 years of age. However, if such a report is available on the record, under Section 4 of the Act, the
Court shall not ignore it and that the Court shall take the report into consideration.
Section 409, 467 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code – these Sections deal with breach of trust by
public servants, forgery of valuable security and will and documents used as a genuine forgery. In
Rev vs By Adv. Sri P.K.Ravisankar and State Of Gujarat vs V.A. Chauhan, on 3 February 1983,
the court did not grant release of the offenders on the basis of Section 3 and Section 4 of the
Probation of the Offenders Act,1958.
Probation of the Offenders Act,1958 does not grant the release on the grounds of kidnap or
abduction. In the case of Smt. Devki v. State of Haryana, AIR 1979 SC 1948 it was observed that
Section 4 would not be extended to the abominable culprit who was found guilty of abducting a
teenage girl and forcing her to sexual submission with a commercial motive.
The Act refrains from providing release of habitual offenders. In the case of Kamroonissa v. the
State of Maharashtra, AIR 1974 SC 2117, the appellant was charged with the theft of gold. She
was punished by rigorous imprisonment. She was under 21 years of age. The probation officer
thus requested the court to grant her the release under Sections 3 and 4 of the probation of the
offender’s Act. The court refused the claim by addressing that the appellant had been engaging in
various crimes before and was arrested in 1971.
Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code – This Section speaks about the violence that causes
grievous hurt. Thus, the Probation of the Offender Act does not provide a release on this basis.
State of Sikkim v. Dorjee Sherpa And Ors– In some cases, the Court does not take technical views
and should take into account certain considerations, such as the risk of work losses, to invoke the
provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act even in serious offences. This was also argued that
the Court would also take into account that convicts belonging to middle-class families with no
criminal record frequently become victims of situations due to the unwelcome business and other
negative forces available to these young generations.
Introduction
The Probation of Offenders Act of 1958 builds on the premise that juvenile offenders should be stopped
by counselling and rehabilitation rather than thrown into jail by being regular offenders. The probation
officer focuses on the offender’s concern or desire, and tries to solve his concern and aims to make the
offender a productive member of the community. Within the criminal justice system, the probation officer
plays a critical or important role. He is at the forefront of the rehabilitation of the prisoners, he helps
confess and rehabilitates the prisoners as a decent citizen in society.
The testing person must comply with the requirements of the court. In the event that the
probationer violates terms, the check agent must report the probation order to the court. The trial
officer must maintain the balance between the offender’s recovery and the safety of society. In
this sense, he has double work. If the probationer makes no improvement in his actions, he would
then have to act as a guardian for society.
Second, the trial officer must accept the probationer as he is, that is, with all his faults. He has to
distinguish between cases which require very little support and attention, those which respond to
guidance and advice and those which require close attention, but which do not respond to his
therapy.
The probation officer must establish a relationship with the offender and create faith in him in the mind of
the offender during the probationary period. He must also construct and give him the confidence in the
offender in deciding his own course. The probation officer must stand by him in order to provide him
with appropriate guidance and suggestions and information, which will enable him in cooperating with
the probation officer to carry out rehabilitation programs.
Probation is an alternative sentence, which the offenders selected under the supervision of probation
officers are allowed to serve a criminal sentence within the community. A probation sentence can require
a criminal to pay fines or restitution or seek advice on substance abuse or for problems with his or her
health or family.
Probation control is one of the ways for courts to punish people who are accused of criminal activity.
Infractors undertake to the court to behave properly, to prevent more crimes and to comply with the terms
of the warrant. Normal supervisory requirements include:
50. Being of good conduct;
51. To comply with the orders of the supervisor;
52. Information about any change of address to the supervising officer.
Based on the circumstances of the case, additional conditions can be imposed by the Court. Examples can
contain:
53. Participation in a course of training;
54. Hostel residence; and
55. Participation in a clinic or program.
For at least six months to three years, the Court is entitled to issue a probation order.
The preparation of a pre-sentence report for guidance by a Court, to grant or not the benefit of
probation, is one of the major tasks of a PO entrusted to under Section 14 (a) of the Act. For
Section 14(a) of the Act, the PO shall submit relevant facts, the information in the report as
requested by the Court, following inquiries into the character of a criminal, his social
circumstances, financial and other circumstances of his family.
The case shall be outlined with a statement of facts. PO’s case review helps the court decide the
right way to deal with the defendant after it’s identified guilty.
The report shall, if submitted to the Court one day before its judgment, be treated like
‘confidential’ and delivered to the Court on the date specified therein; it shall be included in a
sealed cover.
̈ If the PO determines that the probationer has matured enough that further supervision is no
longer required, he will make a request for release of the bond in consultation with the district
probation officer.
Decision making
Whilst deciding on the probationer under his responsibility, the probation officer should remember that
his decisions are of great importance not only for the offender but also for the safety of the community.
Conclusion
The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 is very helpful especially in the present context of prison reform, of
a prison sentence that no longer recognizes the jail sentence as the only course of care to ensure the safety
of society, is of considerable significance to the judiciary and probation services. The alternative
punishment measure, i.e. probation and the theory of reform penalty, can be achieved only by the
cooperation of the judiciary and the administration. This will benefit a country like India, with prisons
that are always overcrowded, with regular abuses of human rights that harden a person’s internality.
Probation is a validation of the human being inside every being, and priority should be granted. In the
sense of current social structures, the rehabilitation and recovery process must be structured to accomplish
the ultimate objective of returning these offenders to an orderly community. For all suitable cases, where
the concept of restorative justice has to be enforced, it is crucial that the various criminal justice systems
organizations work together to make probation an effective method of noncustodial care.
An apparent set of principles focused on reformation and rehabilitation has dominated academic and
political discourse concerning the drafting of laws related to juvenile justice and children in conflict with
the law. The Juvenile Justice Act of 1986 and its subsequent amendments can be considered in many
ways a landmark in signifying changes in the thought process of lawmakers. At the turn of the 21st
century, a need was felt to update the laws bearing in mind prescribed standards set by the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989. The UN Standard Minimum Rules for Administration of
Juvenile Justice, 1985, as well as the UN Rules for Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty,
1990. The legislative exercise subsequently culminated into the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
Children) Act, 2000, along with the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Model Rules of
2000, are replaced by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Model Rules of 2007. In the
wake of the 2012 Delhi gangrape and murder case, one of the accused, who was a juvenile, was sentenced
to three years in a reformation home as per the provisions of the juvenile justice Act, 2000. In light of the
Supreme Court judgement upholding the constitutional validity of the Act, in December 2015, the Delhi
High Court held itself to be bound by the provisions and refused to extend the sentence of the accused.
This led to a widespread feeling of a failure of justice, with the masses protesting in unity with the
victim’s family. Drawing much flak from various sections to correct the supposed gap in the previous act,
the government delivered the juvenile justice (Care and Protection of Children) Bill, 2014, which was
surpassed by the Parliament in its present shape on 22nd December 2015. It acquired the President’s
assent on 31st December 2015, and came into impact on 15th January 2016, as the juvenile justice (Care
and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
In order to achieve the objectives of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child as ratified
by India on 11 December 1992, the Juvenile Justice Act has been promulgated. The procedural guarantees
applicable to children in conflict with the law are specified in this law. The current law addresses the
problems of the existing law, such as delays in adoption processes, the high number of pending cases, the
accountability of institutions, and so on.
The law also addresses the growing number of crimes committed by children aged 16 to 18 in recent
years and by children in conflict with the law. Since January 15, 2016, the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, 2015 has come into force. It repeals the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection
of Children) Act, 2000.
If a child is found guilty of committing a crime, then the Juvenile justice board takes several measures
regarding the minor’s reformation and they are as follows:
Allow the child to return home after proper advice and caution regarding the crime that the child
has committed and what is the punishment of that crime as per the provisions of law.
Juvenile justice boards sometimes also instruct the children to engage in social work and social
welfare so that this engagement can help in imparting good social values in the accused child.
It also makes children busy in group counselling and group activities as much as possible so that
the child can learn the value of working together and can learn how to cooperate with each other
in a society.
If the child has committed a grave crime then, in that case, the child can be sent to the reform
house for a minimum of 3 years or it can be exceeded if required.
Sometimes the Juvenile justice board releases the convicted child on trial if the child is seen to
exhibit good conduct towards the society or an individual.
To know more about introduction and overview of the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act,
2015, please watch the video below:
The juvenile justice system in the US is a flexible, effective and most active system among all
the countries. In India children who commit crime are put under trial and put in
rehabilitation to reform the child and change his behaviour and teach the value of
togetherness and other social values. But, in the US the juvenile is also treated as an adult if
the age of juvenile is nearer to be adult or in the circumstances where the juvenile is a
repeated offender.
The juvenile justice system in the UK came in the year of 1908 in England and juvenile
courts were set up in order to protect the rights of the children and care of the children. In
the UK the Juvenile court also focuses on the negative element which is present in the
society which affects the children to inhabit negative elements and commit crime towards
the society as well as an individual. And to make this Juvenile justice more effective in the
UK they came up with two acts i.e. Children and Young Offenders Act,1993 and Criminal
Justice Act, 1948.
The Children and Young Offenders Act, 1993 act provides immense powers to the juvenile court in the
UK. Any child who commits offence will be put into trial in Juvenile court and not in any other court.
Whereas, the Criminal Justice Act, 1948 deals with the rights of the minor offenders or juvenile
offenders. The main motive of this act was to provide security to the juveniles and also protect the rights
of juveniles.
Process
No juvenile may be housed in a police jail or in prison for any reason. Under Section 32, the Committee,
any police officer or special juvenile police unit or designated police officer shall conduct an investigation
in the manner prescribed upon receipt of a report and order send the child to the children’s home so that a
quick inquiry can be conducted. the worker or child protection officer may be approved by the
Committee, alone or on the report of a person or body referred to in subsection 32(1).
The investigation must be completed within four months of receipt of the order or within the shorter time
limit set by the Committee under Section 32(1), and the deadline for the submission of the report of
investigation may be extended. that the Committee may, depending on the circumstances and for reasons
stated in writing, determine. If, after completion of the investigation, the Committee is of the opinion that
the child has no apparent family or support, he or she may allow the child to remain in the children’s
home until his/ her rehabilitation is found or until he reaches the age of 18.
Children’s home
The state government, alone or in association with one or more voluntary organizations, may establish
and maintain homes in each district or group of districts, as the case may be, to accommodate children in
need of care and protection. during free time. any investigation and thereafter for their care, treatment,
education, training, development and rehabilitation.
The state government may provide for the management of children’s homes, including the standards and
the nature of the services they must provide, as well as the circumstances under which and the manner in
which the certification of a children’s home or the recognition of a voluntary organization may be granted
or withdrawn under rules made under this Act.
Inspection
Inspection committees may be appointed by the state government for the state, district and city children’s
homes, as the case may be, for the period and for the prescribed purposes. It is prescribed that the
inspection committee of a state, district or city must be composed of the number of representatives of the
state government, the local authority, the committee, an organization volunteer and other medical experts
and social experts. The operation of children’s homes can be monitored and evaluated by central and state
governments during the period and through the persons and institutions designated by that government.
Definition of ‘child in need of care and protection’ expanded– Under the new law, the
definition now also includes a child caught working in violation of labour law, with imminent
risk of marriage before reaching the legal age for the same resides with a person who has
threatened or threatened to hurt, exploit, abuse or neglect the child or to violate any other law, or
whose parents or guardians are unable to care from him.
Child Welfare Committee is no longer the final authority in cases of children in need of care
and protection– Anyone related to the child may apply to the district judge, who will review and
make appropriate orders as a district judge. the authority of the Child Protection Committee.
Procedure for inquiry– Unlike children for whom production reports have been received, the
Child Protection Committee must now investigate any child produced before it. Orphaned and
delivered children are also included in the procedure.
An extensive definition of ‘adoption’ provided– The rights of the child have been recognized
and a detailed definition of adoption has now been provided.
Similarities Contrasts
A child born
after birth
referred to as a
teen.
1 Child younger than 18 years. A child may be
in Conflict in
Law in needs
of care and
security.
A juvenile has
a lower age
limit as per
section 82 of
Indian Penal
Code, he must
be over 7 years
2 Juvenile younger than 18 years.
of age.
A child who
faces legitimate
procedures in
the claim of an
offence or
wrongdoing.
A child who
faces legal
Child in conflict with
3 younger than 18 years. proceedings in
the law.
the allegation
for an offence.
Important Definitions
Section 2(13) of the juvenile justice act 2015 signifies a child who is in conflict with the law and asserted
or found to have convicted an offence and not finished the 18 years of age on the date of the delegation of
such an offence.
Section 2(35) characterizes the significance of a juvenile as “juveniles” and a child underneath the age of
18 years.
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2016 are the primary rules. The constitution of
India and UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of juvenile justice, 1985 also known as the
Beijing Rules are guiding fountains. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 known
as UNCRC is the source of all protection issues for children.
Observation Homes
Section 8 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000 provides that the state government may establish and operate
observation houses in each district or group of districts. A minor is temporarily received in these homes.
For the duration of any investigation into them under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
Children) Act 2000, minors are detained in observation houses. Minors are kept for a few weeks in the
observation houses for the social study of minors.
The minor’s story is prepared by the probation officer during his brief stay at the observer’s home. The
competent authority then decides, depending on the case, to keep them in the institution or to entrust them
to their parents. During the stay in the establishment, medical and psychiatric services were also provided,
as well as basic equipment such as food, clothing and accommodation for minors. To keep the mind and
body healthy, young people should water the plants, help in the kitchen and clean the premises of the
shelter.
Special Homes
Section 9 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000, states the state government may establish and maintain
special homes in each district or group of districts. When the offence committed by a minor is proven and
condemned by the competent authority, it is placed in the special home established by the state
governments. In the special home, minors are treated for a long time or until their age ceases.
The ultimate goal of the rehabilitation of juveniles in the homes under the Juvenile Justice (Protection
and Protection of Children) Act of 2000 has therefore been implemented to ensure that all necessary
efforts are made to change the of juveniles. minors of evil to good. Special shelters for minors pay more
attention to the education and vocational training of minors. Minors receive food, clothing, shelter,
medical and psychiatric services, and counselling.
Children’s Home
Section 34 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000 states “The state government may establish and maintain
children’s homes in each district or group of districts.” The children’s home is a home where children in
need of care and protection are placed on the order of a competent authority.
In accordance with the Juvenile Justice (Protection and Protection of Children) Act of 2000 of the
Children’s Home, children are provided with all the services necessary for overall development up to a
fairly high age, that is, until ‘at 18 years old. Services include the provision of food, clothing, shelter,
medical and psychiatric treatment, including counselling and referral. Education and vocational training
are also provided to children.
Shelter Homes
According to Section 37 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000, Shelters Homes as for children in need of
urgent support. Shelter homes provide children with space where they can play and engage in creative
activities. Children are engaged in music, dance, theatre, yoga and meditation, computers, indoor and
outdoor games, etc, to spend their time productively. These creative activities are designed to encourage
meaningful participation and interaction among peer groups.
These activities will ensure the overall growth and development of children. The main purpose of these
shelters is to keep them away from socially deviant behaviours, in addition to meeting their basic needs
for food, nutrition and health. Children can safely keep their property and income in the conditions
provided for in these shelters.
Foster Care
Foster care is one of the non-institutional measures used for the temporary placement of children in
accordance with Section 42 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000. Homeless, abandoned, neglected and
deprived children benefit from a foster family. He replaces parents with others to provide care outside
their own home. The child is placed in foster care when natural parents are faced with problems such as
sentencing, life-threatening illnesses and being abroad. The actual parents pay the corresponding price.
Foster parents are generally interested in childcare. In the foster home, the child receives parental care
and parenting education. Being placed in a foster home helps to avoid the stigma of being in an institution
and adapting to other children. It is considered satisfactory in every way possible. Although foster
families lead to drastic changes in the child’s life and are enough to change their behaviour, the foster
family is solely responsible for the overall development of the children.
Adoption
Restoring family care for children deprived of their real family life Adoption is another non-institutional
measure. Section 2(2) of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2015 defines adoption as the process by which the
adopted child is permanently separated from his biological parents and becomes the legal child of his
adoptive parents with all rights, privileges and responsibilities that are attached to a biological child.
Adoption is done with the mutual consent of the family, who hands over the child and who receives the
child. By adoption, the child receives a new name, a legal status and a permanent family. It also meets the
needs of a childless couple. Adoption gives hope to many orphaned, neglected, abandoned and abused
children by their parents to start a new family. The main purpose of adoption placement is rather a family
for the child than a child for a family.
For the orphan child who is legally free to adopt, it is the most ideal and permanent rehabilitation.
Adoption and foster care are intended to give family life to the child, but the main difference is that foster
care is a temporary placement, even perhaps in the long term, but that adoption ensures permanent care
without involving payment. Foster care can even be adopted.
Sponsorship
Another type of non-institutional measure called the Sponsorship Program provides additional assistance
to families, children’s homes and special homes to meet the medical, nutritional, educational and other
needs of children. Sponsorship is given to improve their quality of life. There are many types of
sponsorship programs for children, such as individual-to-individual sponsorship, group sponsorship or
community sponsorship.
After-care Organisations
The juveniles are taken care of in the organization of the aftercare, which is a transition home, after
leaving the special homes and the children’s home. Minors in conflict with the law and children in need
of care and protection, both categories are placed in aftercare organizations. Monitoring organizations
allow minors to lead an honest and industrious life. Follow-up agencies are committed to the primary goal
of enabling children and youth to adapt to society. In child care agencies, children and adolescents are
motivated to stay in the wider society of their lives in institutional homes.
Monitoring organizations are nothing more than a temporary home set up for a group of young people. In
monitoring organizations, young people are encouraged to learn a trade and also contribute to the
management of the monitoring centre. Any volunteer agency or organization designated as a custodial
organization strives to prepare children, as well as adolescents, to become self-reliant and to acquire the
social and fundamental skills necessary for their full integration into the community.
In the monitoring program, children and adolescents also have access to social, legal and medical
services, as well as appropriate financial support. Continuing education services are regularly offered to
children and youth in the follow-up organization to help them become financially independent and
generate their own income.
The monitoring organization should ensure regular follow-up and support after the reintegration of the
child or minor into the community or society. Members of various government agencies also work
together to reintegrate children or minors into society by enabling them to live psychologically and
economically, as well as by providing ongoing assistance after their integration into society. Institutional
and non-institutional measures have been used not only for the proper care and development of children
but also to address children’s issues adequately as a last resort for the well-being of children and minors.
to be used.
Limitations
It has been speculated that the institutional set-up required under the Juvenile Justice Act has not been
built up completely and district-level institutions generally lack the infrastructure and staff to adequately
execute it. This hampers the work of the rehabilitative and reformative programs leads to disappointment
in accomplishing goals of restoration and reintegration work. There has been practically nil spotlight in
organizing rehabilitative plans. Also, the role of the staff is not under satisfaction. There is a lack of
coordination between staff and children. This leads to fewer opportunities for children to showcase their
talent and skill and health issues of workers to implement certain roles and duties.
Procedure to be followed
Not send a child to a police officer lock-up and not delay the child being transferred to the Child
Welfare Police Officer from the nearest police station. The police officer may under sub-section
(2) of section 12 of the Act send the person apprehended to an observation home only for such
period till he is produced before the Board i.e. within twenty-four hours of his being apprehended
and appropriate orders are obtained as per rule 9 of these rule.
Do not handcuff, neither put a chain or fetter around the ankles of a child and do not exert any
coercion or force.
Inform the child promptly and directly of the charges levelled against him through his parent or
guardian and if a First Information Report (FIR) is registered, copy of the same shall be made
available to the child or copy of the police report shall be given to the parent or guardian.
Provide appropriate medical assistance, assistance from an interpreter or a special educator, or
any other assistance which the child may require.
Not compel the child to confess his guilt and he shall be interviewed only at the Special juvenile
Police Unit or at child-friendly premises or at a child-friendly corner in the police station, which
does not give the feel of a police station or of being under custodial interrogation. The parent or
guardian may be present during the interview of the child by the police.
Not ask the child to sign any statement.
Inform the District Legal Services Authority for providing free legal aid to the children.
Principle of Right to maintain privacy and Confidentiality- Is applied when a crime is committed
and child under trial in police custody inside the juvenile court
Further, Section 24(2) of the act mentions that the board shall order and direct the Police, or through
children’s court that the relevant records of such conviction shall be destroyed after the expiry of the
period of appeal from the registry or, as the case may be, a reasonable period as may be prescribed.
Provided that in case of a heinous offence where the child is found to be in conflict with law under clause
(i) of section 19, the relevant records of conviction of such child shall be retained by the Children Court.
Next, Section 74, of the act mentions:
109. No report in any newspaper, magazine, news-sheet or audio-visual media or other forms
of communication regarding any inquiry or investigation or judicial procedure, shall disclose the
name, address or school or any other particular, which may lead to the identification of a child in
conflict with law or a child in need of care and protection or a child victim or witness of a crime,
involved in such matter, under any other law for the time being in force, nor shall the picture of
any such child be published. Provided that for reasons to be recorded in writing, the Board or
Committee holding the inquiry may permit such disclosure, if in its opinion such disclosure is in
the best interest of the child.
110. The Police shall not disclose any record of the child for the purpose of character
certificate or otherwise in cases where the case has been closed or disposed of.
111. Any person contravening the provisions of sub-section (1) shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or fine which may extend to two lakh
rupees or both.
Section 99, of the act, proclaims:
112. All reports related to the child and considered by the Committee or Board shall be treated
as confidential: Provided that the committee or the board, as the case may be, may, if it so thinks
fit, communicate the substance thereof to another Committee or Board or to the child or to the
child’s parent or guardian, and may give such committee or the board or the child or parent or
guardian, an opportunity or producing evidence as may be relevant to the matter stated in the
report. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the victim shall not be denied access
to their record, orders and relevant papers.
Section 24(5) POCSO, 2012 stresses for the police to make sure officers that the identity of the child is
covered from the public media unless otherwise directed through the Special Court within the benefit of
the child.
Power of Committee
Section 29 deals with the Power of Committee:
(1) The Committee will have the position to discard cases for the consideration, security, treatment,
improvement, and recovery of youngsters needing care and insurance, just as to accommodate their
essential needs and assurance.
(2) Where a Committee has been comprised for any zone, such Committee will, despite anything
contained in some other law until further notice in power, however spare as in any case explicitly given
right now, the ability to manage all procedures under this Act associated with children needing care and
security.
Procedure
A child needing care and security is to be present before the Child Welfare Committee inside 24 hours.
To accommodate youngsters isolated from his/her family. By announcing it has been treated as a culpable
offense. The Child Welfare Committee is to send the kid needing care and security to the suitable Child
Care Institution and direct a Social Worker, Case Worker or the Child Welfare Officer to lead the social
examination within 15 days. The Child Welfare Committees will meet at least 20 days in a month and the
District Magistrate will direct a quarterly survey of the working of the Child Welfare Committee.
A youngster needing care and security will be set in a Children’s Home for care, treatment, guidance,
preparing, advancement, and restoration. The Act accommodates Open Shelters for Children needing
network support on the momentary reason for shielding them from misuse or getting them far from an
actual existence in the city. The Child Welfare Committee could perceive an office to be a fit facility to
incidentally assume the liability of a youngster. The Specialized Adoption Agency is to deal with the
recovery of vagrants, deserted or gave up kids.
Right to be Reformed
The juveniles who are alleged and found committed an offence shall be reformed by restorative justice,
deserving rehabilitation and social reintegration than punitive and retributive punishments. Awarding
punitive and retributive punishments to the children prevents society from moving on. Children are
presumed innocent and immature to understand the consequences of crimes. Therefore, they must not
take responsibility for criminalization. The traditional objective of criminal justice, retribution and
repression must be given away.
Section 27 CrPC clearly mentions that the law is executed for the “treatment, training and rehabilitation
of youthful offenders” who are juveniles. Whereas juveniles justice Rules 2016 is providing rules that
allow the juveniles may get away from treatment, training, and rehabilitation, etc. These are contradictory
concepts.
Case Law: The reformatory approach to punishment should be the object of criminal law, in order to
promote rehabilitation without offending communal conscience and to secure social justice.
Narotam Singh v. The State of Punjab, AIR 1978 SC 1542; Section 27 CrPC
The jurisdiction in the case of juveniles- Any offence not punishable with death or imprisonment for a life
committed by any person who at the date when appears or is brought before the Court is under the age of
sixteen years, maybe tried by the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate, or by any court specially
empowered under the Children Act, 1960(60 of 1960), or any other law for the time being in force
providing for the treatment, training, and rehabilitation of youthful offenders.
The juvenile who is addicted to alcohol or drugs which lead to behavioral change in a person shall be
referred to an Integrated Rehabilitation Centre for Addicts or Similar centers maintained by the State
Government for mentally ill persons for the period required for in-patient treatment of such juveniles.
Section 34 and 35 of Juvenile Justice Rules 2016 defines the manner of health and medical facilities to be
provided.
Efforts shall be made to provide juveniles, at all stages of the proceedings, with necessary assistance such
as lodging, education or vocational training, employment or any other assistance, helpful and practical, in
order to facilitate the rehabilitative process.
Orders
Proposed adopters are permitted to take the child with them and in the application mentioned the details
of the child taken for adoption- The Proposed adopters are proclaimed as the new parents of the said
minor child having rights of parent’s privileges, benefits, and obligations.
Adoptive guardians should take the child out of the ward of the court where all legal proceedings are
going on and take the child to their new home. The Municipal Corporation issued birth certificates to the
minor child referencing the proposed adopters as guardians of the child.
Table 2
The age in which Juvenile can be tried as an
Country
adult
United States of America From the age of 13 years
17 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland,
United Kingdom
16 years in Scotland
The juvenile can be treated as an adult from the
South Africa
age of sixteen years
France The age of being an adult is sixteen
The age of the juvenile who will be treated as an
Canada
adult is fourteen years
Germany At the age of fourteen years.
From the age of sixteen in the case of heinous
India (Juvenile Justice Act 2015)
crimes
Table 3
Type of offences for which the minor can be
Country
tried
aggravated sexual abuse, murder, assault, robbery,
United States of America
firearms offences, and drug
Murder, rape, causing any explosion likely to
United Kingdom
endanger life or property
South Africa robbery, murder, rape
France Armed robbery, murder, rape and drug offences
Serious bodily harm to any person, murder, and
Canada
aggravated sexual assault
Abuse of persons who are incapable of resistance,
Germany
or sexual abuse, or child abuse leading to death
“Serious offence (punishment 3-7 years e.g.
cheating, counterfeiting) or heinous offence,
India (Juvenile Justice Act 2015)
(punishment more than seven years e.g. murder,
rape, robbery)”
Conclusion
According to a 2015–16 economic analysis, it is found that there is a sharp decrease in government school
enrolments in provincial regions from 2007 to 2014. It stressed the need to build these numbers
significantly to accomplish the Universalization of Education. However, considering such proposals,
funds assigned to the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan was raised by a minimum percent. There exists just a single
welfare scheme identified with child labour scheme for the welfare of working children in needing care
and security and that too saw a certain decline in funding.
It is appropriate to take note of those children needing care and security just as children in conflict with
the law scarcely discover whether there any place in the budget allocation. An expansion in wrongdoings
against juveniles and juveniles makes them much progressively powerless, henceforth the absence of
consideration regarding child security is perturbing. Deficient financing for essential plans will
undoubtedly negatively affect the reformative and rehabilitative methodology received by the acts of
2000 and 2015.
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act 2015 was passed in light of the failure of Child protection. Yet
at the same time there exists a similar circumstance due to the absence of duty and commitment,
coordination between different partners in Child Protection and due to the absence of experienced and
logical social work experts in the usage of ICPS at state to grass-root level. Child protection should go
under a single organization following with a positive, adequate and proficient hierarchical structure which
should root till the village level.
Introduction
The fundamental object of the Juvenile Justice Act is to ensure that the child is protected from violence,
abuse, and exploitation. This will ensure that if a child commits an offense he is not tried in the same way
as adults. The term “Children in Conflict with the Law” means a person who is below 18 years of age
comes in contact with the justice system as a result of being suspected or accused of commission of an
offense. A child can come in conflict with the law when he commits petty offenses such as vagrancy,
begging, or alcohol use or serious/heinous kinds of offenses such as rape or murder.
Therefore, this article discusses the relevant procedures pertaining to the Children in conflict with the
Law under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.
Relevant Definitions
Board: The Juvenile Justice Board was constituted under Section 4 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. It is a
competent authority which deals with the matters pertaining to children in conflict with the law and takes
appropriate steps for rehabilitation.
Child Welfare Police Officer: Such an officer is designated in every police station, who is not below the
rank of assistant sub-inspector. He deals exclusively with cases pertaining to juveniles in coordination
with the police authorities and NGOs.
Children’s Court: The courts are established under the Commission of Protection of Child Rights Act
2005 or under the Protection of Children from Sexual offenses Act, 2012. If at all the court is not existing,
the sessions court will have jurisdiction to deal with the matter.
Probation Officer: Such an officer is appointed by the state government as a probation officer under the
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
Special Juvenile Police Unit: They are present in each district in order to deal with the victims or
perpetrators of the crime. They are designated as Child welfare Police officers in every Police Station.
Procedure in relation to Children in Conflict with Law
Chapter IV of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 talks about the Procedure in Relation to Children in Conflict
in Law.
The designated Child Welfare Police officer shall take the child to the hospital for medical
examination.
It must be ensured that the child is comfortable during the medical examination.
When there is a female child, the medical examination shall be conducted by a female doctor
only.
The procedure of medical examination must be clear to the child to ensure there is no anxiety or
discomfort to the child.
During the process of medical examination, the child cannot be asked questions regarding the
case of the child in conflict with the law.
The child cannot be asked any personal question.
Procedure on the production of the child accused who is in conflict with the law (Section 14 and
Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice Act 2015)
138. The child who has been alleged to be in conflict with the law has to be produced before
the Board within the 24 hours of his apprehension.
139. The board shall conduct an inquiry in compliance with the provisions of the act and it
may pass such orders in relation to such a child as it deems fit in accordance with Section 17 and
Section 18 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.
140. In case there is a case of heinous offense, then a preliminary assessment under Section
15 must be disposed of by the Board within a period of 3 months from the date when the child
was produced before the board for the first time.
Role of persons in whose charge the child has been placed
Section 11 of the Juvenile Justice (Child Protection and Care) Act talks about the role of persons in whose
charge the child has been placed.
The provision states that when a person is in charge of the child, he will have the responsibility of the
child as if the said person is the child’s who is responsible for the child’s maintenance.
The necessary condition provided here is that the person will be in charge of the child for the period
stated by the board and notwithstanding the child is claimed by his parents or any other person; except the
board is of the opinion that the parent or any other person is fit to exercise charge over such child.
Bail to a person who is apparently child alleged to be in conflict with the law
Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Child Protection and Care) Act talks about the bail to a person who is
apparently a child alleged to be in conflict with the law.
The provision states that the juvenile who has committed a bailable or non-bailable offense can be
released on bail with or without surety. However, the juvenile cannot be released if there are reasonable
grounds that would bring the child in association with any of the known criminals or expose him to any
moral, physical or psychological danger or his release would defeat the ends of justice.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the Judgement of Om Prakash v. State of Rajasthan observed that
the Juvenile Justice act was incorporated with the laudable object of holding separate trials for children/
juvenile as they are pushed by the force of circumstance and not by choice. However, if the juvenile is
involved in the commission of “heinous nature” like the rape or murder, providing bail to the juvenile
would defeat the purpose of ends of justice as mentioned under Section 12 of the act.
Conclusion
The procedure for children in conflict with the law is established in order to ensure that the justice system
does not focus more on the punishment, but follows an approach to rehabilitate and reintegrate the child
into the society in order to prosper their future endeavors. The provisions of the impugned procedures
under the act ensures that the children are prosecuted in a children-friendly manner and not treated as
adults. However, if a child commits an offense of heinous nature then he can undergo the same trial as an
adult in order to achieve ends of justice.