Roy 1988 An Explication of The Philosophical Assumptions of The Roy Adaptation Model
Roy 1988 An Explication of The Philosophical Assumptions of The Roy Adaptation Model
Roy 1988 An Explication of The Philosophical Assumptions of The Roy Adaptation Model
An
Assumptions of the Roy Adaptation Model
SISTER CALLISTA ROY, RN, PHD*
Nursing as a practice disipline has a strong ing, (b) the author’s perspective of the disci-
philosophical heritage that is relevant to both pline and the clinical science of nursing, and
the social mandate and the scholarly develop- (c) specific assumptions about the adapting
ment of the discipline. Given today’s crucial person in society that are derived from these
ethical issues and the rapid development of perspectives and the theorist’s value orienta-
nursing theory and research, nurse theorists tions.
are compelled to explicate the basic assump-
tions of their work. The assumptions of any
given conceptual model are both philosophic Philosophical Heritage of Nursing
and scientific. The articulation of these as-
The essence of nursing through the ages has
sumptions can contribute greatly to both the been rooted in the relationship between nurse
focus and development of the scheme of sub-
stantive knowledge inherent in the model. The and patient. This was true for Florence Night-
scientific assumptions of the Roy adaptation ingale, who was revered in the popular image
model of nursing have received more attention of the lady with the lamp. Nightingale is rec-
in the literature (Andrews & Roy, 1986; Gort- ognized as one of the greatest humanitarians
ner et al., 1984; McKay et al., 1978; Riehl &
of the 19th century. She founded modern
Roy, 1974, 1980; Roy, 1970, 1976, 1983a, nursing on military and religious principles.
1983b, 1984a, 1984b, 1985, 1987a, 1987b, However, as Palmer notes ( 1983), in Nightin-
1988, in press; Roy & Anway, in press; Roy & gale’s letters to the probationers at St.
Andrews, 1986; Roy & Obloy, 1978; and Roy Thomas’ Hospital, she identified a crucial dif-
& Roberts, 1981) than have the philosophical ference between nursing and other occupa-
tions : &dquo;The main, the tremendous difference is
assumptions (Riehl & Roy, 1974, Roy, 1981, that nurses have to do with these living bodies
1983b). The purpose of this paper is to begin and no less living minds: for the life is
to close this gap at a particularly timely point ...
in social and professional developments. The human life-with living, that is conscious
philosophical basis for the author’s theorizing forces, not electric or gravitation forces, but
and research will be specified by examining human forces&dquo; (p. 14).
In the middle of the next century, the nurs-
(a) the common philosophical heritage of nurs-
ing literature in North America provided fur-
Key Words: Roy Adaptation Model, Veritivity, Philosoph- ther insights about the nurse-patient relation-
ical Assumptions, Humanism
ship. In 1952, Peplau defined nursing as &dquo;a
Received October 12, 1987 significant, therapeutic, interpersonal proc-
Accepted October 23, 1987 ess&dquo; (p. 16). In this view, nursing functions
*School of Nursing, Boston College, Boston, MA. cooperatively with other human processes that
make health possible for individuals in com-
munities. In this same era, Orlando ( 1961 )
described nursing care as looking at patient
26
behavior, identifying the patient’s need for report notes that altruism involves courage,
help, and responding to this need. Travelbee integrity, morality, and objectivity. These
(1966) added the dimension that suffering is a value themes are seen in current writings by
common life experience and that human rela- such authors as Leininger ( 1981 ) and Watson
tionships are what help people cope with suf- ( 1979, 1985).
fering. Basically, nursing is a relationship of Thus one notes, in the early development of
human being to human being. modern nursing and in its expanding years in
the United States, a commitment to persons
as individuals in a social context. Current writ-
assumptions of any given
The ings and deliberations in the field reflect the
conceptual model are both philosophic challenge of living out this commitment in a
and scientific. rapidly changing world. It is within this heri-
tage that contemporary nurse theorists de-
velop their concepts of nursing.
Johnson (1974) emphasized the social re-
sponsibility of the profession as well as its Perspective of the
Discipline
interpersonal dimension. In the era of devel- The author’s perspective of the discipline of
opment of specific models to guide nursing
practice and curriculum, she proposed three nursing can be traced to the influence of John-
criteria for evaluating models. Evaluating the son (1968), who spoke of nursing knowledge
social congruence, social significance, and so- of order, disorder, and control. These notions
cial utility of a given model can be helpful as were used in the depiction of the relationship
criteria extrinsic to the content of the model.
Johnson was committed to the purposeful and
goal-directed development of the theoretical The basic science of nursing focuses on
knowledge of the emerging profession within human life processes.
the context of society.
Nursing’s concern with both individual
needs and the social responsibility of a profes-
sion has given rise to much discussion of the
between conceptual models and theory devel-
ethical problems in the nurse-patient relation-
opment (Roy, 1983a, p 458). The conceptual
ship (Davis & Aroskar, 1983; Murphy & model provides a view of the person that is
Hunter, 1983; Yarling & McElmurry, 1986). .
edge and the results of using the approach. containing the projects of the human mind, a
Science requires the use of controlled, rigor- world of myths, of fairy tales and scientific
ous, and precise methods within a particular theories, of poetry, art, and music. Popper la-
area. The process includes research as well as bels the two levels of this world as (5) human
critical and logical thought. Science is also a language, including theories of self and of
body of knowledge, that is, facts and theories death, and (6) works of art and science, includ-
generated by the scientific processes. To know ing technology. This conceptualization is used
one’s world and to work toward the full reali- to provide a place for materialism and empiri-
zation of created nature, one uses the methods cism within a much larger scheme.
of science to build scientific knowledge. How- Popper (Popper & Eccles, 1981) proceeds to
ever, the philosophical premises reflect a be- present a revised form of the refutation of
lief beyond the empirical world and the value materialism. This argument, which reaches to
of transcending materialism. antiquity, states, &dquo;If materialism is true, it
Early life experiences of wonder that already seems that we cannot know that it is true. If
reflected this value are recounted by the au- my opinions are the result of the chemical
thor. For example, she recalls pondering as a processes going on in my brain, they are deter-
child what forever means and realizing that mined by the laws of chemistry, not of logic.&dquo;
there is a reality beyond the leaves that fall (p. 11). Popper suggests that materialism does
today and the grass that dies tomorrow. Simi- not destroy itself, but that it is self-defeating;
larly, she felt the same sense of awe when, as it cannot seriously claim to be supported by
a beginning nursing student, she had her first rational argument.
301
The author maintains that transcending ativity, there is evidence that people can dis-
materialism is an important value for science cern the good, agree upon it, and seek it. Edu-
because it provides for both integration and cators do not doubt that some types of learning
perspective. It allows one to see one’s work in are better for students than others, even to the
relation to the whole scheme of things and not point of establishing required courses. Educa-
to take any one piece of reality too seriously. tional and health care institutions and the
The scholar is encouraged toward a respect for corporate world have developed mission state-
one’s topic, yet an awe of the larger picture ments and management by objectives to
that allows for a healthy skepticism of one’s achieve their goals. All of this presupposes
own data. If one uses data simply to prove a that one can discern values.
thesis and is blind to all that the data might The consequences of a largely relativistic
be saying about reality, then one misses both view of the world are, according to Price
the opportunity and the joy of scientific dis- (1984), the possibility of developing indiffer-
covery. Beyond what the scholars’ own data ence, neutrality, and triviality. All values be-
can tell them, they know there is a whole of come equally justified; there is no question of
which these data are only a part. better or worse. Expressions of value are seen
In a discussion of Kant’s theory of knowl- as merely a matter of taste, and tastes change
edge, Boas (1957) makes the point that the or do not really matter. Finally, Price speaks
whole man is not the rational man. For ex- to the debasement that comes from a lack of
ample, poetic insight is the archetype of value consciousness. Minds are dulled to the
knowledge for the simple reason that in poetry perception of worth. Admittedly, these effects
logical analysis is destructive not only of the of relativism are stated in the extreme. How-
unity of its object but also of its meaning. From ever, they can stimulate an exploration of a
differing world view, one that is rooted in an
absolute truth.
Three values that come from balancing rel-
Transcending materialism is an ativism with veritivity are conviction, commit-
important value. ment, and caring. If truth is a unity and hu-
mans share in a common, purposeful exist-
ence, then there is great meaning to human
the religious perspective, the person is made interdependence. In both the ancient and mod-
in the image of God and is intregrated into the ern worlds one notes the heights and depths
natural world as a reflection of the creator. to which these values can be developed. It is
God sees creation as a whole; human beings said of Socrates that his courage was a symbol
see it in parts. The poet shares in the vision of of his confidence in his own integrity. As
the unity of creation. A recent comparison of Nietzche was to write, &dquo;What is good? Bravery
robot movement to human movement (Public is good.&dquo; One only risks one’s life for some-
Broadcasting Stations, 1985) clearly demon- thing that one believes and knows to be better
strated the same notion of respect for the hu- than life itself. Jesus, the founder of Christi-
man as not just the material but as a master- anity, said, &dquo;There is no greater love than this:
piece of integration and holism. to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.&dquo; Mother
In dealing with the world view of relativism, Teresa of Calcutta sends sisters and brothers
the author appreciates the scientific advances wherever there is need, to India, Australia, the
of this perspective while recognizing the dan- Middle East, and San Francisco, California.
gers of adhering solely to this point of view. They work with the poor, the destitute, the
Price (1984) describes the pervasiveness of dying and the mentally handicapped as well
relativism in nursing education and lists a as with alcoholics, drug addicts, abandoned
number of reasons for this in contemporary babies, and AIDS patients. The needs of
society. Rejection of the past and, with it, re- humankind are responded to with conviction,
ligious conviction that has long been the chan- commitment, and caring.
nel of exploring and maintaining human val- Given convictions about the goodness and
ues, is common. The past is viewed in contrast value of persons, one comes naturally to the
with progress, and progress is placed above special commitment called caring. This com-
everything else. The new, the up-to-date, and mitment is what motivates one to select nurs-
the contemporary are attractive. This rejection ing as a career. Caring has long been part of
of the past is supported by science and tech- the heritage of nursing. Whereas other authors
nology. There is a tendency to think that only (e.g., Leininger, 1981, Watson 1979, 1985) ex-
in recent times has humankind accomplished plicate the dimensions of this special heritage
anything of worth in the realm of knowledge. of nursing, the author intends to highlight a
For example, people find it difficult to accept particular philosophical basis for this value.
failure of medical treatment because they have Whereas there is physical relativity to the
come to believe that science can answer all world, it is proposed that this can be balanced
unknowns and solve all problems. by a belief in a metaphysical veritivity. The
In spite of the societal pervasiveness of rel- indifference and triviality that can stem from
31
a totally relativistic stance can then be tran- the individual. In addition to the scientific as-
scended. sumption of holism from systems theory, the
Maintaining caring as a value for science as personal unity and integrity of each person
well as for the art of nursing, the author notes should be emphasized. From this assumption
the demands of the rigors of science. Any ap- stems the next, that each individual strives to
proach the scholar takes to learn about and maintain that individual integrity. However,
use knowledge about people and their inter- since people are not complete in themselves,
actions with the environment presupposes a they also reach beyond themselves. Finally, a
great deal of care about the subject. The common source and destiny give each person
scholar believes that the study is worthwhile a deeper realization of the need for relation-
and accepts the commitment of this convic- ships.
tion. The techniques of investigation are rig- The principle of veritivity as discussed here
orous and they are designed to find a piece of stresses assumptions that unite individual hu-
truth while they focus on the value of each man existence with that of all others who
person touched by the study. This care is taken share this condition. The author believes that
in addition to the hope of the ultimate good the individual in society is viewed in the con-
that the work can effect. Care needs to extend text of the purposefulness of all human exist-
beyond the subjects of the study to one’s col- ence. It is not by chance, but by creative de-
leagues. The world of science is fascinating sign, that intelligent life appeared and that
but demanding. Scholars need and deserve the people relate in such socially developed ways
care that colleagues who share the same strug- ~ as through language and humor. As noted in
gle can provide. the conceptualization presented here, each
person has a creative source and destiny. Fur-
Specific assumptions thermore, the purposefulness of the human
life plan is shared and therefore has unity.
The meaning of the philosophical principles Individual activity and creativity, in this con-
of humanism and veritivity is expanded when text, aim beyond self for the common good.
one views the perception of the values inher- Recent studies by Gilligan (1982) identify a
ent in these principles as compared with purr sequence of moral development that involves
rationalism and relativity. The specific as- increasing complexity in the understanding of
sumptions of the Roy adaptation model can be the relationship between self and other. She
identified within the context of these princi- notes particularly the centrality of the con-
ples and the related values. cepts of responsibility and care in women’s
Eight specific assumptons are outlined. In construction of the moral domain.
humanism, it is believed that the individual (a) Finally, a specific philosophical assumption
shares in creative power, (b) behaves purpose- is that life has value and meaning. This key
fully, not in a sequence of cause and effect, (c) value has been implied throughout this discus-
possesses intrinsic holism, and (d) strives to sion. Furthermore, it is a cherished heritage
maintain integrity and to realize the need for of the profession. Travelbee (1966) chose to
relationships. In veritivity, it is believed that put forth the goal of nursing as helping people
the individual in society is viewed in the con- find meaning in suffering. This goal presup-
text of the (a) purposefulness of human exist- poses the value and meaning of life itself for
ence, (b) unity of purpose of humankind, (c) the individual and for human existence in gen-
activity and creativity for the common good, eral. Noted here is the author’s specific view
and (d) value and meaning of life. of the meaning of life.
From an interpretation of the broader prin-
ciple of humanism, the individual is seen not
as the center of the universe but as a partici-
Summary
pant with all of humankind in discovering and
being united with truth. It is believed first that The values and assumptions that have
the individual shares in creative power. This guided the author’s exploration of an adapta-
belief is followed by an explicit statement of tion model of nursing have not changed. How-
the purposefulness of human action. Critics of ever, in this presentation they have been ex-
the author’s early work noted that it sounded plicated specifically. The assumptions enu-
mechanistic because it spoke of stimuli and merated arebased on the common heritage of
behavior. However, the complexities and sub- nursing and the author’s perspective of an
tleties of the process whereby the person takes integrated metaparadigm for nursing and
in and responds to the environment preclude value orientation. This articulation of philo-
such a behavioristic interpretation of the use sophical assumptions can enhance the contin-
of these terms. Furthermore, the examination ued theory development and research based
of any concept of the model in relation to the on the Roy adaptation model of nursing. In
philosophical assumptions articulated here this way substantive knowledge can be devel-
further clarifies this distinction. The third spe- oped for both the basic and clinical sciences
cific assumption notes the intrinsic holism of of nursing.
32
References nursing as the promotion of patient adaptation, clinic
presentation listed in. Communication Nursing Re-
American Academy of Nursing. (1985). Setting the search, 5,207.
agenda for the year 2000: Knowledge development in Roy, C. (1973). Adaptation: Implication for curriculum
nursing. Annual Meeting and Scientific Session of the change. Nursing Outlook, 19, 254-257.
American Academy of Nursing, San Diego, CA. Roy, C. (1974). National health insurance legislation
American Nurses’ Association. (1980). Nursing: A social education packet. Los Angeles: Social Justice Secretar-
policy statement. Kansas City, MO: Author. iat, Sisters of Saint Joseph of Carondelet.
Andrews, H., & Roy, C. (1986). Essentials of the Roy Roy, C. (1975). Psycho-social adaptation and the coping
adaptation model. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century- mechanisms. Unpublished paper for Sociology class,
Crofts. University of California, Los Angeles.
Boas, G. (1957). Dominant themes of modern philosophy. Roy, C. (1976). Introduction to nursing: An adaptation
New York: Ronald Press. model. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chinn, P. L., & Jacobs, M. K. (1983). Theory and nursing: Roy, C. (1977). Decision-making by the physically ill, and
A systematic approach. St. Louis: Mosby. adaptation during illness. Unpublished doctoral disser-
Davis, A. J., & Aroskar, M. A. (1983). Ethical dilemmas tation, University of California, Los Angeles.
in nursing practice (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton- Roy, C. (1978). Health-illness powerlessness question-
Century-Crofts. naire and hospitalized patient decision-making. In M. J.
deChardin, P. T. (1956). Man’s place in nature. New York: Ward & C. A. Lindeman (Eds.), Instruments for meas-
Harper & Row. uring nursing practice and other health care vari-
Donaldson, S. K., & Crowley, D. M. (1978). The discipline ables. (Publication No. HRA 78-53, pp. 147-153).
of nursing. Nursing Outlook, 9, 113-120. Hyattsville, MD: United States Department of Health,
Ewing, A. C. (1951). The fundamental questions of phi- Education and Welfare, Division of Nursing.
losophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Roy, C. (1981). A systems model of nursing care and its
Fawcett, J. (1983). Hallmarks of success in nursing theory effect on the quality of human life. Proceedings of the
development. In P. L. Chinn (Ed.), Advances in nursing International Congress on Applied Systems Research
theory development (pp. 3-17). Rockville, MD: Aspen. and Cybernetics (Vol. 4, pp. 1705-1714). London: Per-
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological gamon.
theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Roy, C. (1983a). Theory development in nursing: A pro-
Harvard University Press. posal for direction. In N. Chaska (Ed.), The nursing
Gordon, M. (1987). Nursing diagnosis: Process and ap- profession: A time to speak (pp. 453-467). New York:
plication. New York: McGraw-Hill. McGraw-Hill.
Gortner, S., Ellis, R., Roy, C., Williams, C., Benner, P., & Roy, C. (1983b). Roy adaptation model and application to
Mercer, R. (1984). Explanation in nursing science [Ab- the expectant family and the family in primary care. In
stract] Communicating Nursing Research, 17, 101- I. Clements & F. Roberts (Eds.), Family health: A theo-
103. retical approach to nursing care (pp. 255-278, 298-
Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation level theory. New York: 303, and 375-378). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Harper & Row. Roy, C. (1984a). Introduction to nursing: An adaptation
Johnson, D. E. (1968). Theory in nursing: Borrowed and model. (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
unique. Nursing Research, 17, 206-209. Roy, C. (1984b). The Roy adaptation model: Applications
Johnson, D. E. (1974). Development of theory: A requisite in community health nursing. Proceedings of the
for nursing as a primary health profession. Nursing Eighth Annual Community Health Nursing Confer-
Research, 23,
372-377. ence, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina
Kim M. J., McFarland, G. K., & McLane A. (1984) Classi- Press.
fication of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the Fifth Roy, C. (1984c). Values for science: A clinical nurse schol-
National Conference. St. Louis: Mosby. ar’s perspective. Inaugural Address of the Geraldine
Leininger, M. M. (1981). Caring: An essential human Crawford Distinguished Nursing Lecture Series, Uni-
need. Thorofare, NJ: Slack. versity of San Francisco, School of Nursing.
McKay, R., Brockway, B., Muhlenkamp, A., Nakagawa, H., Roy, C. (1985). Practice in action: Clinical research. Fac-
guayhagen, M., Roy, C., & Stembler, M. (1978). Stress: ulty Practice in Action, Second Annual Nursing Faculty
Conceptualization and measurement for nursing. Com- Practice Symposium, American Academy of Nursing.
municating Nursing Research, 11, 67-76. Roy, C. (1986). Testing nursing interventions for cogni-
Murphy, C. P., & Hunter, H. (1983). Ethical problems in tive recovery. Presented at the First Annual Nursing
the nurse-patient relationship. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Research Conference, San Francisco.
Orlando, I. J. (1961). Dynamic nurse-patient relation- Roy, C. (1987a). Roy’s adaptation model. In R. Parse (Ed.),
ship. New York: G. P. Putnam. Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories, and cri-
Palmer, I. S. (1983). From whence we came. In N. L. tiques (pp. 35-45) Philadelphia: Saunders.
Chaska (Ed.), The nursing profession: A time to speak Roy, C. (1987b). Response to: Needs of spouses of surgical
(pp. 3-28). New York: McGraw-Hill. patients: A conceptualization with the Roy adaptation
Peplau, H. E. (1952). Interpersonal relations in nursing. model. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 1, 45-
New York: Putnam’s. 50.
Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1981). The self and its Roy, C. (1987c). Nursing knowledge for clinical practice:
brain. New York: Springer. Focus and process for development. Plenary Session
Price, J. E. (1984). Philosophical proem for the person of Address at International Research Congress. Spon-
the nurse educator: The question of values. Unpub- sored by Sigma Theta Tau, University of Edinburgh, and
lished, University of Portland, Portland, OR. Royal College of Nursing Research Society. Edinburgh.
Public Broadcasting Stations (1984). The brain [Series for Roy, C. (1987d). Acoustic neuroma: 500 patients describe
television]. New York: WNET. life after surgery. Research presentation
for American
Riehl, J., & Roy, C. (1974). Conceptual models for nursing Association of Neuroscience Nurses Annual Meeting,
practice. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Dallas.
Riehl, J., & Roy, C. (1980). Conceptual models for nursing Roy, C. (1988). Human information processing and nurs-
practice (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century- ing research. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 6.
Crofts. Roy, C. (in press). Altered cognition: An information proc-
Roy, C. (1967). Roles cues and mothers of hospitalized essing approach. In P. Mitchell, M. Hodges, M. Mus-
children. Nursing Research, 16, 178-182. waswes, & C. Walleck (Eds.), AANN’s Neuroscience
Roy, C. (1970). Adaptation: A conceptual framework for Nursing: Phenomenon and Practice. Norwalk, CT: Ap-
nursing. Nursing Outlook, 18, 43-45. pleton-Lange.
Roy, C. (1972). Pilot study to develop test of one aspect of Roy, C., & Anway, J. (in press). Theories and hypotheses
33
for nursing administration. In B. Henry, M. DiVincenti. Travelbee, J. (1966). Interpersonal aspects of nursing.
C. Arndt, & A. Marriner (Eds.), Dimensions and nursing Philadelphia: Davis.
administration. Boston: Blackwell. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New
Roy, C., & Obloy, M. (1978). Practitioner movement: To- York: Braziller.
ward the science of nursing. American Journal of Nurs- Watson, J. (1979). Nursing: The philosophy and science
ing, 78,
1698-1702. of caring. Boston: Little, Brown.
Roy, C., & Roberts, S. (1981). Theory construction in Watson, J. (1985). Nursing: Human science and human
nursing: An adaptation model. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: care. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Prentice-Hall. Yarling, R. R., & McElmurry, B. J. (1986). The moral
Rush, J. E. (1981). Towards a general theory of healing. foundation of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science,
Washington, DC: University Press of America , 63-73.
8
34