epiLAWgue

HINDI CINEMA AND THE EVOLUTION OF

THE ANGRY YOUNG MAN

SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT:

FLAMES OF IDENTITY IN ASSAM'S
LEGAL CRUCIBLE

ENIGMATIC DEPARTURE

FROM “INDIA FIRST” TO “INDIA OUT"

EVOLUTION OF INDIA'S FOREIGN

POLICY UNDER NDA

NEURALINK WANTS TO WIRE THE

BRAIN TO THE INTERNET?

DECEMBER 2023
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

HINDI CINEMA AND THE EVOLUTION OF

THE ANGRY YOUNG MAN

Zanjeer was released in 1973, at a time of great economic and political turmoil within
the country, giving us “the angry young man” and Amitabh Bachchan’s
superstardom. 50 years later, the audiences have been given Animal and Ranbir
Kapoor has been given his first 500 crore superhit. Given that this archetype has now
completed half a century in Hindi cinema, it becomes pertinent to ask two questions.

Who is this young man and why is he always so angry? The angry young man
archetype became popular in the 70s through films like Zanjeer, Deewar (1975) and
Muqaddar ka Sikandar (1978) with Amitabh Bachchan playing the lead. Audiences
disillusioned by unmet promises and increasingly less democratic practices flocked to
the theatres to watch a protagonist with a similar angst resisting the system with
violence. The protagonist was equal parts relatable as well as aspirational, with a
strong moral compass driving his actions as he beat up “bad guys” and fixed broken
systems. Respect for the family and protecting women’s dignity always remained sub
themes to establish the protagonist as a righteous man.

These characters have remained some of the most highly celebrated characters in
Hindi cinema, having appealed to the core sentiments of the audience. Similar
characters have been created throughout the past five decades with varying amount of
success. But as Javed Akhtar stated in an interview to The Times of India, “Speaking
of today’s characters, I wonder if they are angry, or just violent.” For today's
audience, the manifestation of the "angry young man" personality becomes apparent
when they consume content from figures like Andrew Tate or watch movies such as
Kabir Singh or Animal. This might have to do with the fact that all inner turmoil is
expressed through violence in these films, something that was not the reality in the
70s. The fact that violence is not only easy to create with today’s technology, it is also
good from an economic perspective makes it more desirable to filmmakers.

Even in this context, Animal stands out as a film (or sticks out like a sore thumb to
many). This movie follows the rough prototype of popular films like "Arjun Reddy"
or "Kabir Singh," featuring a disturbed protagonist with a streak for violence and an

PAGE 1 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

obsessive desire to protect the women around him.The anger transforms into mania
and justifiable violence into bloodlust. The film struggles to effectively establish
cause, blinding the audiences with gore. Female characters, instead of acting as a
catalyst for the plot, are responsible for accepting the misogyny thrown at them
without reaction. Geetanjali, played by Rashmika Mandanna does take a stand
towards the end but it comes off as too little agency too late into the story.

While Vanga has stated that troubled characters make for great drama, the director
often fails to illustrate the origins of these heroes' troubles. This storytelling approach,
where certain toxic and misogynist traits are glorified to the end of the world,
necessitates troubleshooting. This glorification only reinforces societal conditioning
and justification, especially in the Indian setting, of men acting violently when under
emotional turmoil, and women finding such behaviour attractive. Filmmakers often
do not make the effort to coherently depict the psychological insights into the hero's
personality, further strengthening existing societal beliefs.

In a world where parents find it increasingly challenging to connect with their

children, movies like "Animal" are creating a blueprint for teenage boys to follow.
This blueprint provides a foundation for young men to act aggressively and be
territorial towards women as a result of having a disturbed childhood. Further,
Ranvijay claiming that he is an “alpha male” only glorifies toxic traits that young
teenage boys begin to imbibe. When we consider the other films that have made
massive success in India, be it Bahubali, KGF, RRR, Pushpa, Ghajini or Agneepath,
it makes us ponder if the Indian Audience enjoys films that affirm violence as a means
to resolving conflict.

The movies in the 70s incorporated fights as a spectacle in the climax. All the turmoil
before this was purely internal and emotional, represented through the dialogues.
Glamorisation of savagery takes away the destructive nature from such acts and
makes it appear thrilling and heroic.

The most obvious and serious repercussion of such allure with violent spectacles is the
desensitisation of aggression it creates, especially in the younger demographic of the
society. It also leads to the inability to understand the real world consequences of it.
While creative liberty is an important part of cinema, mainstream filmmakers cannot
shirk away the responsibility of its impact on their audience.

PAGE 2 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

Mainstream cinema has an immense impact and every time a controversy ridden film
crosses a certain level of success, it becomes pertinent to understand which emotions
of the audiences are being affirmed by it. When movies depicting such highly
problematic beliefs are confronted by applause and hooting in theatres, it forces one
to introspect as a society regarding the opinions we hold as a collective. Artists must
learn to strike a balance between the themes they choose to explore and also consider
the serious repercussions such spectacles can have on society. Considering the large
audiences that watch these films in theatres or on ott platforms, mainstream
filmmakers must accept that they have the power to influence social narratives and use
it in a way that contributes positively to society.

PAGE 3 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

Section 6A of the Citizenship Act:

Flames of Identity in Assam's Legal Crucible
Beneath the emerald glow of Assam's tea gardens and the Brahmaputra's swirling
embrace, a legal and social tinderbox crackles with renewed fervour. Section 6A of the
Citizenship Act, 1955, a contentious legacy born from the ashes of ethnic strife, hangs
heavy over the state's fragile identity and uncertain future. Its roots, planted deep in
the turbulent 1980s, witnessed violent clashes between indigenous Assamese
communities and Bengali-speaking migrants from Bangladesh. Fueled by political
anxieties over demographic shifts and perceived threats to Assamese culture, this
animosity culminated in the 1985 Assam Accord, where Section 6A emerged as a
precarious truce. It offered a pathway to Indian citizenship for specific migrant
groups who arrived between 1966 and 1971, aiming to quell the immediate flames
while laying the groundwork for future stability. But the embers refused to die.

In 2012, Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha, a voice for the state's diverse communities,
challenged Section 6A's very soul. They argued it reeked of discrimination, favouring
Bangladeshi migrants over others within India and creating a distinct category of
citizenship marked by the arbitrary timeline of entry. The spectre of cultural dilution
loomed large, with fears of Assamese language, traditions, and political
representation being eclipsed by a potential influx of new citizens. Concerns regarding
the opaqueness of verification processes and potential national security vulnerabilities
further amplified their plea for abrogation.

The legal battle reached a critical juncture in 2014, with a two-judge bench
acknowledging the complexities at stake by referring the case to a larger
Constitutional Bench. In 2017, the five-judge bench, comprising Justices Madan B.
Lokur, R.K. Agrawal, Prafulla Chandra Pant, D.Y. Chandrachud, and Ashok
Bhushan, began hearing arguments. The petitioners, their voices echoing with
concern, argued that Section 6A violated the Constitution's guarantees of equality
(Article 14) and the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21).

Fast forward to December 5, 2023. The legal dispute ignited anew, with a five-judge
bench comprising Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Surya Kant, M.M. Sundresh, J.B.
Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra taking centre stage.

PAGE 4 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

Indigenous Assamese Groups shared their concerns about facing discrimination,

losing their culture, and feeling politically marginalised. They contended that Section
6A unfairly privileged Bangladeshi migrants over other migrants within India,
creating a discriminatory two-tier citizenship system based on entry date. The
anxieties over preserving Assamese identity were palpable, with petitioners voicing
fears of their language, traditions, and political representation being swept aside by a
demographic tide. Concerns about the lack of transparency in verification processes
and potential national security vulnerabilities further amplified their plea for repeal.

The current government stood firm in their stance and continued to fiercely defend
Section 6A as a historical necessity born from Assam's unique circumstances. They
argued that it acknowledged the undeniable reality of mass migration during a
specific period and offered a humane solution for those caught in its crossfire.
Striking it down, they warned, would leave thousands stateless, potentially
destabilising the region. Moreover, they dismissed concerns about cultural dilution
and security threats as unfounded, insisting that proper implementation and robust
safeguards could address them.

Now, tensions rise as those presenting their case intensify their arguments. They have
highlighted case studies, historical data, and sociological analyses to demonstrate the
discriminatory nature of Section 6A, arguing that it disproportionately impacts non-
Bangladeshi migrants and creates an unsustainable burden on Assam's resources.
They have also questioned the effectiveness of verification processes and raised
concerns about potential national security implications.

Yet, the government stands firm in its defence. They have emphasised the historical
context of the Assam Accord and the need for a humane solution for those who
entered during a specific period. They have also presented data and analyses to
counter the petitioners' claims and reiterated their faith in the effectiveness of
safeguards to address concerns about cultural dilution and security threats.

In Assam, a crucial decision is pending on a citizenship law that selectively applies to

migrants. Indigenous groups fear for their culture, while the government is concerned
about potential statelessness. The judges are now weighing both sides and have
reserved their judgement. The verdict will significantly impact Assam's future and the
ongoing debate about identity and citizenship.

PAGE 5 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

ENIGMATIC DEPARTURE
The public dispute that occurred on 17th November which led to one of the biggest
corporate farce in recent history was Sam Altman’s removal from Open AI. It caused
four days of disruption within the startup and resulted in four senior employees
resigning. Over the past few years, OpenAI has grown tremendously making Sam the
most vocal influencer of AI. However, something big happened that sent shockwaves
across the globe, Sam Altman was ousted by the OpenAI board and was replaced by
CTO Mira Murati, the new Interim CEO of the AI powerhouse. This has made us all
ponder as to what were the possible reasons for his removal? They tell us that Sam
Altman was not transparent to the board, however, we get assertions, but no concrete
evidence to back it, and the departure is too enigmatic to not dwell into the intricacies
of it.

Sam Altman, an accomplished American Entrepreneur, co-founder of OpenAI, who

collaborated with other big tech faces of world like Elon musk, Ilya Sutskever, Jessica
Livingston, Peter Theil and Reid Hoffman to bring this revolutionary AI technologies
to the forefront. Awarded as the CEO of the Year by The Times Magazine, he serves
as one of the 100 most influential people in the world and plays a pivotal role in
positioning OpenAI at the forefront of the artificial intelligence revolution. The
poster boy of the AI revolution advocates for the need to regulate the AI, as he states
“ As it gets more powerful, we will need some guardrails on it” but not at the expense
of limiting its usage.

On 17th November, the board came out with a unanimous decision to dispel Sam
Altman from the position of CEO, followed by a review process by the board, which
came out as a surprise both to the inside and outside of the company, since it’s been
reported how things were going systematically. On being asked about the reason as to
why he was dispelled, the board stated how Altman’s communications weren’t
transparent enough and were becoming a hindrance in the smooth functioning of the
company's affairs. This has created a shift in the relationship of the Ex-CEO and
company, signaling towards the breakdown of trust.

The story changed again when Sam Altman received a letter in early December from
the company to come back at the position of CEO. Altman, who without delay

PAGE 6 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

returned to the position of CEO after his ouster, has maintained silence about the
incident, and Microsoft, a significant OpenAI backer, holds a 49% stake in the
company, has offered no insights. Even former board members, who resigned in the
aftermath of Altman’s departure, have refrained from public disclosure. OpenAI and
Altman have proceeded with operations, with Microsoft integrating the startup’s
tools into its virtual assistant named Copilot. However, Altman’s image may have
undergone long lasting damage, requiring time for the repercussions to fully unfold
and clarity to emerge from the unresolved situation.

Speculations thrive, with various theories emerging to explain Altman’s sudden exit.
OpenAI said it had ousted CEO Sam Altman after an assessment found he was “not
consistently forthright in his conveyance" with the board of directors. “The board no
longer has confidence in his capacity to continue leading OpenAI," Reports have
appeared, contending manipulative and deceiving demeanor by Altman.

The Open AI episode shows how insubstantial the AI ecosystem is currently,

including addressing AI risks. There is a lot that remains unknown about Altman’s
initial ousting and then retaining him. OpenAI and Altman are such leading players in
AI space, this enigmatic departure may raise trust concerns around a burgeoning
technology that the general public still have questions about.

The chronology of events of the last few days have not only jeopardized OpenAI’s
attempt to introduce more ethical governance in the management of their highly
valued corporate startup, but it also shows that corporate governance alone, even
when well-intended, can easily end up dismantled by other corporate dynamics and
interests. Rules and banisters, designed with companies and enforced by regulators
rigorously, are crucial if we are to benefit from AI.

Multiple experts have commented that this conundrum highlights how it should be
governments and not big tech AI giants that should be in the saddle on AI regulation,
particularly for fast-evolving technologies like Generative Artificial Intelligence.

PAGE 7 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

FROM “INDIA FIRST” TO “INDIA OUT"

They say geopolitics is a strong boy’s club, exclusive for the big old sovereigns.
Sometimes this perception is shattered by minuscule states that jolt the roots of well-
established nations, one such recent underdog is the Maldives. In 2008, the first
democratic elections took place in Maldives, two major parties emerged out of this,
one party was “pro-India" and the other “pro- China”, fortunately for India though
the former won the confidence of the majority. The party in power was very vocal
about their “India-first” policy.

However, of late six lakh Maldivians elected their new President, Mohamed Muizzu,
alarming the Indian polity. Now the question may arise why this newly elected leader
from a small archipelago nation would blaze sirens in India.

The Indian Ocean is one of the important regions in the world geopolitically.
Maldives is strategically located to the south of the Indian peninsula, enjoying warm
ties with India. The Indian government has not only spent significantly on the
Maldivian economy, be it infrastructural or economic support but also ensured their
political stability. The Maldivian political coup of 1988, organised by a fringe group
was thwarted by Indian assistance when troops were sent into the island nation,
restoring democracy. Because of these historical and cultural ties, India’s influence in
Maldives couldn’t be ignored. The increasing perception of an over-reliance on the
northern partner gradually instilled discomfort in the minds of citizens, ultimately
reshaping the political landscape in the region.

The former opposition leader capitalised and tapped into the popular feeling and
made it the forefront agenda of his presidential campaign, coining the “India out’’
movement. India has a military command in the nation manned by a handful of men,
who assist the nation in providing emergency services and medical evacuations. What
does India benefit from all of this? An open gateway to the Indian Ocean, to ensure
the influence it holds over the region doesn’t fade. The people of Maldives however
saw this as a threat to their national security and felt that perhaps their sovereignty
was being compromised in the hopes of pleasing an emerging power.

PAGE 8 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

China and its over-ambitious plans:

The Indian Ocean comprises middle-power countries such as Indonesia and Thailand
which don’t pose any danger to the ‘Giant rising power’, smaller countries
surprisingly do. The ocean houses many tiny nations scattered over a huge area and
these island nations, often in need of financial aid, approach a strong investor who
boasts of having a golden chest with seemingly unlimited withdrawal. That’s an
illusion that China paints.

Belt and Road Initiative (also known as BRI) is a project that the Chinese
government has been pushing on to other countries. On paper it aims to create a
seamless logistical module that would connect smaller nations to China fostering
trade relations, benefitting all the parties involved, they say a win-win for all.
Nonetheless, the reality says otherwise. Credit with quick disbursement and tax
regulation is preferred by these island nations and could even overshadow the element
of punitive interest rate, that’s how China bursts into the scene. When the nations fail
to repay the loans, the transport module, whether it be an airport or a seaport, the
Chinese government takes full-fledged control over it. This Chinese ownership
inherently means that the country in question loses some degree of its sovereignty. Sri
Lanka too, got entangled in the debt trap and a port slipped out of their hands,
India’s concern for the same, is that it could be used as a military base by the Chinese
authorities. This time his government would not only lean towards China but also see
it as India's replacement.

A general perception exists that a small hostile nation can’t threaten a superpower,
this myth was shattered when Cuba housed Russian warheads giving clear access to
the Russian authorities which could’ve led to a potential nuclear strike. Had the Cold
War taken an ugly turn, a small island nation would’ve been the facilitator of a
nuclear war. As we progress towards an Asia- dominated world, a new Cold War is
clouding between the new rising superpower, India and China. And are we ready to
deal with another Cuba in our south?

PAGE 9 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

EVOLUTION OF INDIA'S FOREIGN POLICY

UNDER NDA
As the second term of the NDA Government nears its end, it presses for the need to
evaluate the changes in India's foreign policy. Over the last 76 years, India's foreign
policy has undergone vast changes . From Jawaharlal Nehru to Narendra Modi,
every Prime Minister has paved their own path however, a broad consensus on the
basic objectives can be noticed in the foreign policy followed by them. In this article,
we aim to elucidate the NDA government's role in the evolution of India's foreign
policy.

Since assuming office in 2014, the Prime Minister has turned India into a strategic
player with a highly effective foreign policy. Not only did the ministers attend a series
of high profile summits and establish a strong rapport with India's counterparts but
also revamped a key initiative ‘Act East.’ The ‘Act East’ initiative aimed to build
better ties and promised to play a major role in providing security, improving
infrastructure and revamping defense with India's neighbors particularly the Middle
East and the South East Asia that is the Indian Ocean region. Nine years down the
line, the Indo China tensions have worsened , generating a major strategic flaw in
Modi's desire to play a key role in the global scenario at the expense of disregarding
India's immediate neighbors.

Another diplomatic shift that has taken place under theNDA Government has been
its ignorance of the Non Alignment Movement. For India, the concept of Non
Alignment was officially established by the then Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru's
participation at the 1961 Belgrade Conference. However, in terms of realpolitik, it
seems that India, in spite of being a founding member of the Non Alignment
Movement has already non aligned itself from the same. For a few years now, Non
Alignment has not been on the top of our policymakers foreign policy agenda.

India’s External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar, said in an interview that non-

alignment was a concept of relevance in a specific era and a particular context, though
the independence of action enshrined in it remains a factor of continuity in India’s
foreign policy. This indirect assertion coupled with the fact that Narendra Modi has
skipped two successive NAM Summits in Venezuela (2016) and in Azerbaijan (2019)
speaks volumes.

PAGE 10 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

Having said that, India is currently pursuing NAM 2.0 by having abstained from all
the resolutions moved against Russia in the UN since the Ukraine War. The neutral
stance taken by New Delhi may very well work in its favor as it continues to receive
oil from Russia while maintaining a relationship with the West or might prove to have
given short term tactical benefits in the future.

With China's growing influence and it’s focus on increasing its hold over Asia with the
Belt and Road Initiative, it became imperative for India to strengthen its position in
the Indo Pacific. This led to the evolution of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue,
commonly known as “the Quad” from a senior-level security dialogue involving the
U.S., Japan, India, and Australia, to leader-level summit since 2017, displays the
rapidly changing strategic landscape in the Indo-Pacific.

One cannot forget the cultural impact India has internationally and the global
community recognises India’s significant contribution in the exercise of its soft power,
the concept of ‘Vasudhaiva kutumbakam - one earth, one family and one family.
Vasudhaiva kutumbakam in a Sanskrit phrase that means the world is one family,
was the theme for the G20 when India took over the presidency. India’s soft power
has been uncovered through its ancient culture, cuisine, language and lifestyle.

This holistic foreign policy not only focused on strong diplomatic relations with the
international community through summits, economic commerce and trade but also
perpetual escalation of its soft power across the globe. As India combats the slow
economic growth and the fast-changing patterns of trade and investment, one of the
key external constraints that Indian foreign policy failed to conquer is, of course,
China. The diplomatic relations between India and China have not improved however
this has prompted New Delhi to strengthen to deepen ties with Australia, Japan and
other Asian countries.

To conclude, this robust shift under the leadership of Narendra Modi has established
India as a confident player in the new global order. While leaders after the
independence chose a rather conservative route, the current policymakers are not
afraid to take an assertive stance. However, we must take essential steps in
establishing a balance, maintaining sovereignty and increasing influence within the
global community.

PAGE 11 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

NEURALINK WANTS TO WIRE THE

BRAIN TO THE INTERNET?
In the evolution of technology, Elon Musk's Neuralink has become a promising
method to repair the relationship between the human brain and machinery.
Created with the vision of improving human cognition and solving neurological
diseases, Neuralink represents a revolution at the intersection of neuroscience and
technology. Neuralink's main reason for funding is because of the excitement and
anticipation surrounding it. This article outlines the goals, challenges, and
implications of Elon Musk's Neuralink and highlights its profound impact on the
future of human-computer computing.

Neuralink Corporation, founded by Elon Musk in 2016, is preparing to develop

and pioneer brain-machine interface (BMI) technology to bridge the gap between
the human brain and computers. Musk envisions a future where Neuralink devices
will integrate with the human brain and allow direct communication between the
brain and external devices. The overall goal is to improve intelligence,
communication speed and solve neurological problems such as stroke, different
disabilities and various brain diseases. Many applications of Neuralink technology
include treating neurological disorders, improving cognitive functions, and
facilitating communication between humans and machines.

Neuralink's innovative technology is the development of neural implants,

commonly known as brain implants. This device consists of ultra-thin flexible
electrodes that are placed in the brain and facilitate two-way communication.
Electrodes capture nerve signals, converting thoughts into commands for external
devices and vice versa. Musk envisages a small-scale facility that uses advanced
robots to ensure precision and safety. In May, Neuralink announced it had
received approval from the FDA for human clinical trials, following a significant
$280 million in funding led by San Francisco's well-known venture capital firm
Founders Fund.

Neuralink has a great future in medicine. The benefits of Neuralink and similar
BMI technologies are diverse and impact every aspect of human life. This
technology could provide new treatments for nervous system diseases, including
stroke, epilepsy, and ome mental disorders. Neuralink's ability to continue

PAGE 12 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

improving cognitive skills such as memory, learning, and problem-solving could be

especially beneficial for people with cognitive disabilities or those looking to enhance
their brain. The technology has the potential to change communication by enabling a
direct connection with the brain and facilitating the control of external devices such as
prosthetics or robotic systems, thus improving the quality of life of the weak or
debilitated.

Despite its promise and potential benefits, Neuralink faces its own challenges and
ethical concerns. The effects of brain implants have raised concerns about their long-
term effects on brain health that may be irreversible. Placing materials into the human
brain causes problems in ensuring biocompatibility and preventing harm, making the
body immune to foreign objects. The implant needs to be long-term and reliable, while
accurate interpretation of nerve signals needs to reduce noise and increase accuracy.
The nature of the data collected from the brain interfaces is highly personal and
maintaining its privacy and security is crucial to preventing unauthorised access or
misuse. It also raises questions about the fairness of access to such technologies, as
their initial use will be limited to those who can afford it. Ensuring that Neuralink's
innovation benefits society as a whole without existing inequities will be critical to its
successful integration into healthcare.

After receiving approval from an independent review panel in September 2023,

Neuralink plans to offer nerve implants to paralyzed patients as part of the PRIME
study. PRIME, short for Precision Robotic Implantation Brain-Computer Interface,
aims to evaluate the safety and functionality of implants. Experimental patients will
undergo a surgical procedure in which a machine is inserted into the part of the brain
that controls movement. The chip will record brain signals and send them to
applications to allow people to control a computer cursor or keyboard using only
their thoughts. Musk has been working on Neuralink's mission to connect the human
brain to computers for five years, and the company has previously tested it on
animals, but no clinical studies have been conducted. Especially after the monkey died
while testing a project in 2022.

Controversially, the US lawmakers have been urging the US Securities and Exchange
Commission to investigate Musk for making allegedly false statements about the
animal testing. A dozen neuralink employees have also apparently confessed about the
rushed and botched surgeries being performed on animals in an effort to progress

PAGE 13 | epiLAWgue
 GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE

more quickly into human testing. In response to the animal welfare concerns, Musk
also tweeted that no monkeys had died as a result of these implants and that they had
only chosen monkeys that were already close to death as their subjects.

Elon Musk's Neuralink is thus, at the forefront of innovation pushing the boundaries
of what is possible in the integration of the human brain and technology. Although
the process of achieving a brain-computer interface is fraught with problems and
ethical issues, its benefits are equally propitious.As Neuralink continues to develop its
technology, people, including their representatives electorally and elected
governments and scientific fora, need to engage in thoughtful and robust discussions
about the ethical, social, and economic implications of the project.

PAGE 14 | epiLAWgue
CONTRIBUTORS Hindi Cinema and The Evolution Page 01
of The Angry Young Man
~ Riya Kulkarni and Vaishnavi Srivastav

Section 6A of The Citizenship Act Page 04

~Rushil Motwani and Harshal Dorkhande

Enigmatic Departure Page 06

~ Ridhi Chalana and Harsh Jadaun

From “India First” to “India Out” Page 08

~Siddhesh Kuchibhotla and Isha Kulkarni

Evolution of India’s Foreign Page 10

Policy Under NDA
~Khyati Somani and Aditi Somani

Neuralink Wants To Wire The Brain To Page 12

The Internet?
~Nirja Pore and Kanishka Pankaj

Creatives- Aaryaa Shinge and Riya Kulkarni

ANOUSHKA LOKHANDE
Chief Student Editor

SARTHAK DAS
Deputy Student Editor

SANSKRUTI DHURI
Design