Title: Understanding the Challenges of Writing a Literature Review

In the academic world, literature reviews are a crucial component of scholarly research. They serve
to provide a comprehensive overview and analysis of existing literature related to a specific topic or
research question. However, the process of crafting a literature review can be daunting and
challenging for many students and researchers.

One of the primary difficulties in writing a literature review is the extensive amount of research
required. Conducting a thorough review of existing literature involves searching through numerous
scholarly articles, books, journals, and other sources to identify relevant studies and findings. This
process can be time-consuming and requires strong research skills to sift through the vast amount of
information available.

Furthermore, synthesizing the information gathered from various sources into a coherent and
structured narrative is another challenge. A literature review should not merely summarize existing
literature but should also analyze, critique, and evaluate the findings to identify gaps in knowledge
and areas for further research. This requires critical thinking and analytical skills to synthesize
complex information and present it in a clear and organized manner.

Additionally, ensuring that the literature review is up-to-date and includes the most recent research
findings adds another layer of complexity. With the constant evolution of research and new studies
being published regularly, keeping abreast of the latest developments in the field can be challenging.

For those struggling with the complexities of writing a literature review, seeking assistance from
professional writing services can be beneficial. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert assistance in
crafting high-quality literature reviews that meet the rigorous standards of academic research. Their
team of experienced writers can help streamline the process, saving time and ensuring that the
literature review is thorough, well-organized, and meets the requirements of your academic
institution.

In conclusion, while writing a literature review can be challenging, it is an essential skill for any
student or researcher engaged in academic inquiry. By understanding the complexities involved and
seeking assistance when needed, you can effectively navigate the process and produce a literature
review that contributes to the advancement of knowledge in your field.
It might aim to: Exemplify a theory by showing how it explains the case under investigation Expand
on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that need to be incorporated Challenge a theory
by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with established assumptions To ensure that your analysis
of the case has a solid academic grounding, you should conduct a literature review of sources related
to the topic and develop a theoretical framework. The natural history of hereditary multiple
exostoses. The upper limb (6 cases) and the spine (6 cases mainly involving cervical vertebrae (C3,
C4, C5 and C7)) represented about 6% of cases, followed by scapula (5 patients). This is an example
of secondary research because it compiles and analyzes data from multiple existing studies and meta-
analyses rather than collecting new, original data. Among 105 patients, 32 (26 males and 6 females)
were under 30 years (30%); in 18 of them the pelvis region or the proximal femur were involved and
16 developed grade 2 chondrosarcomas. Thematic description (in prose) organized around and
related directly to the issue rationale and relevance in an evaluation framework a survey of a specific
question or policy issue. Note that more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from
chronological order. However, we are mostly focusing on meta-analyses that use randomized studies.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Data Analysis The aim of a meta-analysis
is to derive a conclusion with increased power and accuracy than what could not be able to achieve
in individual studies. This can negatively impact on number of milder cases (characterized by less
health complaint and no need of surgical intervention), leading to a series not completely
representative of whole MO population. A random-effect model assumes heterogeneity between the
studies being combined, and these models are used when the studies are assumed different, even if a
heterogeneity test does not show a significant result. Team members independently evaluate the
studies being considered for inclusion in the review and compare results, adjudicating any
differences of opinion. Sometimes when people talk about a “systematic literature review”, they are
using the phrase interchangeably with “systematic review”. The exclusion criteria were review
articles, irrelevant or duplicate papers, and papers without full text available. There is no one way to
conduct a literature review, but many scholars proceed in. The conclusions suggest a need for further
research to develop and implement more effective interventions addressing specific stressors and
using randomized controlled trials. Produced by Jan Glover, David Izzo, Karen Odato and Lei
Wang. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations. Yen-Hong Kuo Jersey Shore Medical Center Meridian Health System
Neptune, New Jersey U.S.A. Outline. Introduction Planning Research. Mutations in the EXT1 and
EXT2 genes in hereditary multiple exostoses. If you want to know more about statistics,
methodology, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations
and examples. Identify extent and quality of work already carried out in the subject area Identify
key contacts Avoid duplication. Tertiary literature sources also called as “search tools” are. You can
either browse this journal or use the Search within this publication feature. Reports include market
research reports, government reports etc. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and
definitions of key concepts. Only 6 patients were older than 50 years had a grade 2 or 3 lesion. In
such a situation, it is better to announce “there was no strong evidence for an effect,” and to present
the P value and confidence intervals. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014;4:33. Jiang S, Yang Y, Wu R, Yang Q,
Zhang C, Tang Y, Mo C.
Two of them underwent intraoperative ultrasound localization, which successfully guided the
laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS-
APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. Secondary Sources Primary, Secondary and Tertiary
Literature in the Sciences Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources in the Humanities. Where are the
gaps in the knowledge of the subject. Make sense of the evidence in the case(s) to answer the
research question Gather data from a predefined group of respondents by asking relevant questions
Can be conducted in person or online Why you chose this method (questionnaires, focus group,
experimental procedure, etc) How you carried out the survey. Trends in Information Increasing
importance of digital information. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. JGCT is rare,
and has characteristic clinical manifestations. Come up with alternatives and propose specific actions
based on the alternatives Describe the result or improvement it would achieve Explain how it will be
implemented Recommendations should have an innovative approach and should be feasible. Validity
-- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing. Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for
Enhancing Research, International FDP on. Thus, differences in variation among studies are thought
to be due to not only random error but also between-study variability in results. Use one or more of
these resources to locate journal articles on our topic. Their bibliographies, however, can be used to
identify primary sources. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research
Imagination. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or
mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews
as well as for any other genre. If you need help with your research, do not hesitate on contacting me,
I am here to help you. A literature review should have the following features (Caulley, 1992). In
simple terms, a literature is a review of the literature in the related subject area. For example, what
might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East. This needs to be
planned in the predetermined protocol before starting the meta-analysis. A good strategy is to begin
by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of
contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. Note: You can also find systematic reviews and
other filtered resources in these unfiltered databases. That might help spark an intriguing hypothesis
for a research project of master’s thesis. Learning Goals. To understand the magnitude of health
information available today To be able to classify questions as background or foreground To
understand the differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary resources. There is no linear or
straightforward way of finding a suitable research topic. “You will find yourself drafting a summary
before you have gathered all your data; you will start formulating an argument before you have all
your evidence; and when you think you have an argument worth making, you may discover you have
to return to the library for more evidence. When combining data from continuous variables, the mean
difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) are used ( Table 2 ). Here, the definition
of the word “similar” is not made clear, but when selecting a topic for the meta-analysis, it is essential
to ensure that the different studies present data that can be combined. Literature review - find out
from literature, what is the background to the questions that you are looking into Site visit - use the
literature review to read up and prepare good questions before hand. Systematic Approaches to a
Successful Literature Review.
Here are some examples: Chronological: The simplest approach is to trace the development of the
topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are
introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). The diamond shape indicates the
pooled estimate and uncertainty for the combined effect. One tumor located in the cortex with the
size of 1.2 cm, showed slightly high density on non-contrast enhanced CT and mild enhancement
during parenchymal phase on contrast enhanced CT. Cite this Article in your Essay (APA Style)
Drew, C. (April 6, 2023). 15 Secondary Research Examples. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on
ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. Three common methods are used
for weighted estimation in a fixed-effect model: 1) inverse variance-weighted estimation 3), 2)
Mantel-Haenszel estimation 4), and 3) Peto estimation 5). In addressing these points, you argue for
your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple
reporting of other sources. They also allow for collaboration, and some provide the ability to store
and annotate PDFs within the system. The ASCII text is searchable by keyword and Boolean
operators, and records are linked to the corresponding full-text page images. This research did not
receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.
Case studies are often a good choice in a thesis or dissertation. Therefore, various guidelines have
been suggested for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses to help standardize them and
improve their quality. The effects persisted throughout the participants’ lives, suggesting that
education is an effective way to raise intelligence. Across the studies, there were a total of 906
participants. A lit review is a type of research paper that answers these sorts of questions: What is
known and unknown about this issue. Fourth, if the results use dichotomous data, the NNT values
can be reported, as described above. Washington DC: American Pharmacists Association; 2005. p.
191-228. West, PM. Literature evaluation. However, they identify several factors affecting the
success of social media in the classroom, including: school culture, attitudes towards social media,
and learning goals. Data, including age, gender, site, histological grade, cartilage cap thickness,
surgical treatments, surgical margins, genotype mutational status as well as treatment details were
captured from the hospital electronic health records and from Registry of Multiple
Osteochondromas. Calculation of the Number Needed to Treat in the Dichotomous table Fixed-effect
models and random-effect models In order to analyze effect size, two types of models can be used: a
fixed-effect model or a random-effect model. The rib was the site of malignant transformation in 3
cases (3%). MGa and AR revised the stained sections, contributed to clinical diagnosis, and
participated to the draft of the paper. Surgery and follow-up All 15 patients underwent partial
nephrectomy. Background of topic and your goal Literature review Methodology Research question
and hypothesis (if applicable) Research methods Sources to be used Significance of your research
Difficulties that you predict you will encounter Research training required. EB contributed to clinical
diagnosis, data collection and manuscript drafting. The collection consists of 265 periodicals and
4471 monographs from continental Europe, the U.S., the United Kingdom, Canada, and New
Zealand. Describe the importance of drug information centers in the evolution of pharmacy practice.
Literature Review. A literature review is a comprehensive examination of available information that is
related to your research topic. A discussion section will attempt to place the work in a larger
theoretical context and may suggest further research to follow and extend the conclusions. Mutation
screening of EXT1 and EXT2 by direct sequence analysis and MLPA in patients with multiple
osteochondromas: splice site mutations and exonic deletions account for more than half of the
mutations.
Thereafter, the data are reviewed qualitatively and quantitatively. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address
on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. We conducted a retrospective
cohort study on patients diagnosed and followed up from 1960 to 2019 to describe the clinical and
pathological features of individuals affected by peripheral chondrosarcoma in multiple
osteochondromas, to evaluate follow up information and individual outcome and to compare the
results with literature. One tumor located in the cortex with the size of 1.2 cm, showed slightly high
density on non-contrast enhanced CT and mild enhancement during parenchymal phase on contrast
enhanced CT. In recent years, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been actively performed in
various fields including anesthesiology. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. As
you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of
document ). By documenting each step explicitly, the review is not only reproducible, but can be
updated as more evidence on the question is generated. In addition, 32 cases were younger than 30
years and almost the 7% of the cases were younger than 20 years. A case study is an appropriate
research design when you want to gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific
real-world subject. Their need stems from the ever-increasing output of scientific publications.For
example, compared to 1991, in 2008 three, eight, and forty times more papers were indexed in Web
of Science on malaria, obesity, and biodiversity, respectively.Given such mountains of papers,
scientists cannot be expected to examine in detail every. Consequently, it remains challenging to
determine how individuals manage their shift work schedules. A meta-regression analysis is similar to
a normal regression analysis, except that the heterogeneity between studies is modeled. What makes
it so difficult to distinguish between the two. The most common surgical treatment was the complete
resection, followed by debulking, amputation and partial resection. Genotype-phenotype correlation
in hereditary multiple exostoses. Unfiltered resources: typically original research and first-person
accounts. In the natural and social sciences, primary sources are often empirical studies—research
where an experiment was performed or a direct observation was made. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 253, 119911. Source. In 47 cases (34 males and 13 females), a pathogenic variant was
identified, in particular 31 patients (66%, 21 males and 10 females) carry a disease-causing variant on
EXT1 gene, while an EXT2 causative variant was found in 16 patients (34%, 16 males and 3
females). Physical constants Melting point, boiling point, flash point, density, solubility data, toxicity
data, refractive index. Requires individual registration to use.. American Chemical Society -- Journal
archives This link opens in a new window Full text archive of all journals published by the American
Chemical Society with a simple, easy to use search engine. Users will be personally liable for any
infringement of Copyright and Licensing laws. By Carol Hollier on 07-Jan-2020 12:42:03 For those
not immersed in systematic reviews, understanding the difference between a systematic review and a
systematic literature review can be confusing. Anticoagulants are prescribed to patients who are at an
increased risk for developing blood clots. Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of
existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and
standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and
analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. The following table provides a detailed
explanation as well as the differences between systematic and literature reviews. Study Planning It is
easy to confuse systematic reviews and meta-analyses. To see how to use the limit and find full text,
please see our Joanna Briggs Institute Search Help page. Secondary Sources Primary, Secondary and
Tertiary Literature in the Sciences Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources in the Humanities.
Outcome in disease-free survival highlights that a worse course of the disease was associated with
histological grade 2 or 3, and partial resection surgery. He has trained kindergarten teachers in 8
countries and helped businessmen and women open baby centers and kindergartens in 3 countries.
Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject? II.
MB performed data collection, cleaning, and interpretation. Consequently, it remains challenging to
determine how individuals manage their shift work schedules. You can also review the indexes of
books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. The age at
diagnosis of SPC ranges from 13 to 63, with median age at diagnosis of 34 years. Reviewers ensure
all content reflects expert academic consensus and is backed up with reference to academic studies.
If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give
you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you
discuss the literature itself. Primarily to find journal articles Other useful sources. Start intro by
describing problem area (5.1; 5.2; 5.3; 5.4) Lit review is a persuasive review of literature (5.6; 5.15)
Use direct quotations sparingly (5.14). Documentaries, feature films, and TV news broadcasts can
provide insights into the fantasies, biases, political attitudes, and material culture of the times in
which they were created. Sitemap case study creative writing presentation problem solving rewiew
prompts websites tips. However, we are mostly focusing on meta-analyses that use randomized
studies. Enables you to examine the data within a specific context. Disease-free survival from
histological report. 1A: Graphical Disease-Free Survival for the entire follow up period. 1B: Detailed
data at 5 and 10 years of follow up from histological reports At the latest follow-up (December
2020), 97 patients were alive (66 males and all 31 females), while 8 patients died, 3 of them due to
the disease. Prepared as a Component of the Community Strengths and Needs Assessment in Carroll
County, Maryland By the Center for Health Program Development and Management at University
of Maryland, Baltimore County. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other
scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on
a topic. EP performed all molecular analyses, assessed the interpretation of the resulting variants, and
participated to all the steps of drafting process. Literature search and study selection In order to
secure proper basis for evidence-based research, it is essential to perform a broad search that includes
as many studies as possible that meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Use Caution When
Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's
information or opinions accurately and in your own words. However, people can also use the phrase
systematic literature review to refer to a literature review that is done in a fairly systematic way, but
without the full rigor of a systematic review. The introduction lays the foundation for understanding
the research problem and should be written in a way that leads the reader from the general subject
area of the topic to the particular topic of research. This can negatively impact on number of milder
cases (characterized by less health complaint and no need of surgical intervention), leading to a
series not completely representative of whole MO population. No tumor relapse was found in any of
the 15 patients during the follow-up of 6 months to 15 years. Data Analysis The aim of a meta-
analysis is to derive a conclusion with increased power and accuracy than what could not be able to
achieve in individual studies. The available studies in medical literature often did not provide detailed
information about malignant transformation in MO or suffered by some bias; in particular, some
studies are based on anonymous web-based survey, with self-reported information by the patient,
without follow-up details. Objectivity -- is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial.
Mellon Foundation, the digital archive makes available long-inaccessible but valuable public and
private programming featuring the world’s foremost writers, intellectuals, and artists in candid and
often heated discourse about the most relevant cultural and political issues of our times. By
reviewing 239 articles from top journals, the study identifies key factors that influence electric
vehicle adoption.
Corresponding authors Correspondence to He Liu or Qingli Zhu. Write the case description, the
context and the process involved. Niranjan Chavan skeletal system details with joints and its types
skeletal system details with joints and its types Minaxi patil. On the Ovid platform using the multi-
field search option, the search would look like this: reviews.sh. AND cassava.af. In 2011 FSTA
introduced the descriptor META-ANALYSIS, making it easy to search specifically for systematic
reviews that include a meta-analysis published from that year onwards. The main purpose of this
type of research is to identify, review, and summarize the best available research on a specific
research question. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics
could focus on the development of online political satire. In a subgroup analysis, the data are divided
into subgroups that are expected to be homogeneous, and these subgroups are analyzed. However,
what if you have never written or even read a literature review. There are many different research
methods you can use to collect data on your subject. Tertiary sources include almanacs,
chronologies, dictionaries and encyclopedias, directories, guidebooks, indexes, abstracts, manuals,
and textbooks. They keep your project focused and manageable when you don’t have the time or
resources to do large-scale research. Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most
convincing or least convincing. This way the case study is not just an isolated description, but is
integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. They include point-of-care resources, textbooks,
conference proceedings, etc. Journal title abbreviations ACS style uses abbreviated journal titles.
When the MD is used, the combined units must be shown. Contains the clinical portions of
Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. Background of topic and your goal Literature review
Methodology Research question and hypothesis (if applicable) Research methods Sources to be used
Significance of your research Difficulties that you predict you will encounter Research training
required. You can also find systematic reviews in this unfiltered database: To learn more about
finding systematic reviews, please see our guide: Filtered Resources: Systematic Reviews Critically-
appraised topics Authors of critically-appraised topics evaluate and synthesize multiple research
studies. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. The
Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this
article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Includes news, editorials, and policy
analysis as well as the latest research. In: Pharmacotherapy self-assessment program: science and
practice of pharmacotherapy I, II, III. Taken together, contrast enhanced CT should be considered in
all cases of JGCT. The main types of filtered resources in evidence-based practice are: Scroll down
the page to the Systematic reviews, Critically-appraised topics, and Critically-appraised individual
articles sections for links to resources where you can find each of these types of filtered information.
All 15 JGCTs were solitary tumors, including seven in the right kidney and eight in the left kidney.
What makes it so difficult to distinguish between the two. In other words, it gathers evidence from
other research and presents it to students. These are the research papers contains details of research
done in a particular. A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key
sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ).