Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rashad Trice Plea Agreement Document
Rashad Trice Plea Agreement Document
This constitutes the plea agreement between Rashad Trice and the United
States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Michigan. The terms of the
of violating Title 18, United States Code, Section 1201(a), the following must be
true:
the victim;
described above.
sentence that the Court can impose for a violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Imprisonment: Life
Fine: $250,000
Supervised Release: Not more than 5 years
Special Assessment: $100
sentence that the Court must impose for a violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Financial Cooperation.
2
Case 1:23-cr-00095-RJJ ECF No. 55, PageID.413 Filed 03/21/24 Page 3 of 10
agreement;
away any asset worth $5,000 or more, without first notifying the U.S.
presently on probation in another case, the conviction in this case may result in
3
Case 1:23-cr-00095-RJJ ECF No. 55, PageID.414 Filed 03/21/24 Page 4 of 10
prison for all or part of the term of supervised release, which could result in the
8. Factual Basis of Guilt. Defendant and the U.S. Attorney’s Office agree
and stipulate to the following statement of facts which need not be proven at the
Defendant took the victim and drove in a Chevrolet Impala, via I-496,
I-96, and I-696, to the Detroit area. Throughout the night, Defendant
repeatedly played a YouTube video on the internet in an attempt to pacify the
victim. Defendant took the victim to an alley between Olympia Street and
Edgewood Avenue in Detroit, where he strangled the victim to death with a
pink cell phone cord.
4
Case 1:23-cr-00095-RJJ ECF No. 55, PageID.415 Filed 03/21/24 Page 5 of 10
to move to dismiss the remaining count of the Indictment against Defendant at the
time of sentencing.
oppose Defendant’s request for a two-level reduction of his offense level for
However, the U.S. Attorney’s Office reserves the right to object to Defendant’s
the criteria set forth in the Commentary to Section 3E1.1. Should the Court grant
a two-level reduction as provided herein, the Government will move the Court to
grant an additional one-level reduction if the adjusted offense level is 16 or gre ater
United States Sentencing Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) are not mandatory, the
Court must consult the Guidelines and take them into account when sentenci ng
Defendant. Defendant understands that the Court, with the aid of the presentence
report, will determine the facts and calculations relevant to sentencing. Defendant
understands that Defendant and Defendant’s attorney will have the opportunity to
sentence to be imposed. Defendant further understands that the Court shall make
the final determination of the Guideline range that applies in this case, and may
5
Case 1:23-cr-00095-RJJ ECF No. 55, PageID.416 Filed 03/21/24 Page 6 of 10
impose a sentence within, above, or below the Guideline range, subject to the
range or sentence shall not constitute a basis for withdrawal of the plea.
Defendant and the U.S. Attorney’s Office have no agreement as to the applicable
reserve the right to seek any sentence within the statutory maximum, and to argue
for any criminal history category and score, offense level, specific offense
up the right to persist in a plea of not guilty and the right to a speed y and public
trial by jury or by the Court. As a result of Defendant’s guilty plea, there will be no
trial. At any trial, whether by jury or by the Court, Defendant would have had the
following rights:
could not afford an attorney, the right to have the Court appoint an attorney
to represent Defendant.
reasonable doubt.
6
Case 1:23-cr-00095-RJJ ECF No. 55, PageID.417 Filed 03/21/24 Page 7 of 10
Defendant.
behalf and present evidence in opposition to the charges, including the right
not to testify or present evidence, to have that choice not be used against
Defendant.
14. FOIA Requests. Defendant hereby waives all rights, whether asserted
this case, including without limitation any records that may be sought under the
Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. §
552a.
that the Court is not a party to this agreement and is under no obligation to accept
any recommendation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office or the parties regarding the
7
Case 1:23-cr-00095-RJJ ECF No. 55, PageID.418 Filed 03/21/24 Page 8 of 10
established by statute, Defendant cannot, for that reason, withdraw his guilty plea,
and he will remain bound to fulfill all of his obligations under this agreement.
Defendant will receive, except that it will be within the statutory minimum and
maximum.
the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Michigan, and cannot bind any
does not apply to or preclude any past, present, or future forfeiture or civil actions.
agreement, whether before or after sentencing, the United States shall have the
right to terminate this agreement, or deny any or all benefits to which Defendant
would otherwise be entitled under the terms of this agreement. In the event that
the United States elects to terminate this agreement, the agreement shall be
considered null and void, and the parties shall return to the same position they
existed. In such an event, Defendant shall remain liable for prosecution on all
original charges, and the United States shall be free to bring such additional
charges as the law and facts warrant. Defendant further agrees to waive and
8
Case 1:23-cr-00095-RJJ ECF No. 55, PageID.419 Filed 03/21/24 Page 9 of 10
forever give up his right to raise any claim that such a prosecution is time-barred if
the prosecution is brought within one (1) year of the breach that gives rise to the
18. This is the Complete Agreement. This agreement has been entered
into by both sides freely, knowingly, and voluntarily, and it incorporates the
complete understanding between the parties. No other promises have been made,
MARK A. TOTTEN
United
nited State
States Attorney
9
Case 1:23-cr-00095-RJJ ECF No. 55, PageID.420 Filed 03/21/24 Page 10 of 10