Struggling with your thesis writing? You're not alone.

Crafting a thesis can be one of the most

challenging tasks for any student. From extensive research to meticulous analysis, the process
demands time, effort, and a deep understanding of the subject matter. And let's not forget the
pressure of presenting original insights and coherent arguments that contribute meaningfully to the
academic discourse.

One particularly daunting aspect of thesis writing is the discussion of results. This section requires
not only the ability to interpret data accurately but also the skill to contextualize findings within
existing literature and theoretical frameworks. It's a delicate balance between presenting empirical
evidence and drawing insightful conclusions that advance knowledge in the field.

Navigating through this intricate process can feel overwhelming, especially when faced with looming
deadlines and high academic expectations. That's where professional assistance can make a world of
difference.

At ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔, we understand the complexities of thesis writing, particularly in the

discussion of results. Our team of experienced writers comprises subject matter experts who are
adept at conducting in-depth analyses and crafting compelling discussions that resonate with
academic standards. Whether you're grappling with qualitative or quantitative data, our writers have
the expertise to guide you through every step of the process.

By entrusting your thesis to ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and uncertainty
associated with discussing results. Our tailored approach ensures that your thesis not only meets but
exceeds your expectations, delivering a well-crafted discussion section that showcases your academic
prowess.

Don't let the challenges of thesis writing hold you back. Order from ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔ today
and embark on the path to academic success with confidence.
The information on Figure 1 came from the leaf extract on the paper chromatography that we used;
with the help of acetone, we saw the spectrum and the differences of the different pigments. The
standard for chlorophyll a peaked at 430 and 662, chlorophyll b peaks at 453 and 642, xanthophyll a
range from 450 to 550 and for the beta-carotene peaks at a range from 450 to 550. The heading at
the top of this page is the full title of the manuscript, with each important word capitalized as on the
title page. Outline for gay rights research paperOutline for gay rights research paper real-world
problem solving project-based solutions creative writing prompts for grade 1 define briefly how to
read a research paper. In reporting and publishing research in the biomedical sciences (pp.
Immediately after this is the subheading “Participants,” left justified and in italics. If two sources
have the same first author, they are listed alphabetically by the last name of the second author. Here
are some titles from recent issues of professional journals published by the American Psychological
Association. The second approach works well when you are discussing a general idea and especially
when you want to include multiple citations for the same idea. It was later expanded and published
as a book by the association and is now in its sixth edition. Our results were roughly around the
same as you can see from Table 1. Typically it begins with certain preliminary issues. Quantitative
And Qualitative Research Sample from image.slidesharecdn.com The results and discussion sections
are one of the challenging sections to write. The first is that the number of slides should be no more
than about one per minute of the talk. In reported study, majority respondents assigned 3.5 to health
and wellbeing applications meaning that they have slightly lost in popularity. This works well when
there are complicated materials to describe. It includes material which does not belong to the results
section such as interpretation and discussion; In this subsection, the findings of this study are
compared and contrasted with the literature to descriptions of sampling practices within five
approaches to qualitative research in education and. A good discussion guide is arguably the most
important part of your testing plan. You can organize your discussion around key themes, hypotheses
or research questions, following the same structure as your results section. The action you just
performed triggered the security solution. Alternatively, the researcher can ask ethnographic research
questions via online surveys and questionnaires created with formplus. Concluding the discussion do
finish the discussion with insightful concluding thoughts. Both include only the last names of the
authors and the year of publication. The field experts constitute the target audience of a writer, and
they possess the background information about the chosen problem. It is not synonymous with “good
writing” in general. Herein your findings rather than those of the other researchers are discussed. In
the first, the participants section is followed by a design and procedure subsection, which describes
the rest of the method. Sometimes it is necessary to provide a preliminary discussion in your for
example, if you randomly assigned subjects into groups, are these two groups comparable. Part of
being a good writer in general is adopting a style that is appropriate to the writing task at hand, and
for writing about psychological research, this is APA style. It should introduce the topic and provide
context for the research being conducted.
It is acceptable to argue that the balance of the research supports the existence of a phenomenon or is
consistent with a theory (and that is usually the best that researchers in psychology can hope for), but
it is not acceptable to ignore contradictory evidence. The conclusion is the final section of the
research paper and summarizes the main findings and conclusions of the study. It includes material
which does not belong to the results section such as interpretation and discussion; In this subsection,
the findings of this study are compared and contrasted with the literature to descriptions of sampling
practices within five approaches to qualitative research in education and. It is very much important
for you to demonstrate how your research findings relate to the literature review and also research
questions. Although researchers attending a professional conference are likely to discuss their work
with each other informally, there are two more formal types of presentation: oral presentations
(“talks”) and posters. Source: For example, if you have completed a qualitative research project, you
might have identified some key themes within the in terms of presentation, both the findings and
discussion chapters will benefit from a clear and logical introduction and chapter summary. Source:
s3.studylib.net Discussion (what does it mean?): Source: Results and discussion are essential sections
of your original research article. There are several actions that could trigger this block including
submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. Whereas, tables are ideal
to present large quantities of data and exact values. Safelink is used by legal, professional and
financial services to protect sensitive information, accelerate business processes and increase
productivity. Here are some of the events we've hosted to show you how much we appreciate our
customers and show you some of the fun new products coming out on the market. The second is a
brief overview of the method and some comment on its appropriateness. Thus formal writing avoids
slang, contractions, pop culture references, humor, and other elements that would be acceptable in
talking with a friend or in writing informally. The approach is founded on objective knowledge,
where a good methods section of research proposal example would for instance use questions that
seek yes or no answers. Before sending the manuscript to internal, and external referees, we should
contact with them, and ask them if they have time to review our manuscript. Some of them include
that the individuals in different groups did not have the same control as the others. For example the
discussion section therefore needs to review your findings in the context of the literature and the
existing knowledge about the subject. The results and discussion section of your research paper
should include the following 5. It is better to write “a replication of Milgram’s (1963) study” than “a
replication of Milgram (1963).” Second, when there are two authors the names are not separated by
commas, but when there are three or more authors they are. The results and discussion are (relatively)
cut and dried. There is a significant positive relationship between the number of hours spent by
students in answering mathematics questions and their. Recall that the standard sections of an
empirical research report provide a kind of outline. There is a slide with the title and authors, a few
slides to help provide the background, a few more to help describe the method, a few for the results,
and a few for the conclusions. The Writing Process Step 1: Preparation Step 1 Continued: Planning
with Purpose Step 1 Continued: Planning based on your Audience Step 1 Continued: Planning based
on Context Step 1 Continued: Planning with a Project Calendar Step 2: Research Step 2 Research
Continued: Evaluating Your Research Step 3: Organizing with Outlines Step 4: Drafting and
Designing Step 5: Revising (or Editing) Step 6: Proofreading 1. Concluding the discussion do finish
the discussion with insightful concluding thoughts. Then identify five specific differences between
how that description is written and how it would be written in APA style. In this subsection, the
findings of this study are compared and contrasted with the literature to descriptions of sampling
practices within five approaches to qualitative research in education and. Of course, you should
consult the Publication Manual or Online APA Style Resources for details on how to format them.
The results section of a scientific research paper represents the core findings of a study derived from
the methods applied to gather and analyze information. If you are currently in this stage of your
publishing journey, subscribe. Source: image.slidesharecdn.com Discussion essays consider both sides
of an argument.
When facilitating discussion you need to provide a complete and correct picture of things that can be
concluded from research. The opening introduces the research question and explains why it is
interesting, the literature review discusses relevant previous research, and the closing restates the
research question and comments on the method used to answer it. They might also be interested to
know what you think the future of your field is. The dining room was described as similar to a fine
restaurant except that tipping was not required. Discussion sections interpret the most significant
results as they help shed light on the study's research questions. After discussing the main points of
your argument, you can present the significance of these points. Have you shown that current
methods are inadequate for answering the big question. The published journal article looks quite
different from the copy manuscript. Our titan security framework ensures your data is secure and you
even have the option to choose your own data location from Channel Islands, London (UK), Dublin
(EU), Australia. In reported study, majority respondents assigned 3.5 to health and wellbeing
applications meaning that they have slightly lost in popularity. The conclusion is the final section of
the research paper and summarizes the main findings and conclusions of the study. Indicate what
next steps can be taken to further pursue any unresolved questions. I would highly recommend this
service to every student seeking assistance. Discussion (what does it mean?): It follows the
presentation of the methods and materials and is presented before the discussion section—although
the results and discussion. Their final sentence is, “If people understand the situational forces that
can make them hesitate to intervene, they may better overcome them” (p. 383). However, this kind
of ending can be difficult to pull off. For example, the title and author information, the abstract, and
the beginning of the introduction generally appear on the same page rather than on separate pages.
There are several techniques that you can utilize for writing research paper discussions. Regardless of
what journal you are submitting to, the discussion section always serves the same purpose:
concluding what your study results actually mean. Out of all the parts of a research paper, here you
will be expected to analyze the data you have obtained in the course of your research. The second is
a brief overview of the method and some comment on its appropriateness. International journal of
endocrinology and metabolism, 17(3). Now is the time to discuss these issues and how they might
have affected the results. Some journals now make the raw data available online. Source:
image.slidesharecdn.com Example of discussion in lab report. Another fact that has been discovered
is that when writing a research paper discussion section also consists of limitations of the study. Use
Safelink to collaborate securely with clients, colleagues and external parties. Based on information in
this chapter, what are the main strengths and main weaknesses of each poster. From this perspective,
many features of APA style that at first seem arbitrary actually make good sense. This section
includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary
research and different types of research you can do. If applicable, begin this part of the section by
repeating what you consider to be your most significant or unanticipated finding first, then
systematically review each finding.
Strong Discussions immediately carve out a place for themselves in the large universe of papers by
saying what makes this one interesting or special. Discussion essays consider both sides of an
argument. Their function is to present new research to interested researchers and facilitate further
interaction among researchers. It introduces the research question and explains why it is interesting.,
which is usually a paragraph or two in length, introduces the research question and explains why it is
interesting. In fact, the basic results should be clear even to a reader who skips over the numbers. In
reported study, majority respondents assigned 3.5 to health and wellbeing applications meaning that
they have slightly lost in popularity. Figures can also be used to illustrate theories (e.g., in the form
of a flowchart), display stimuli, outline procedures, and present many other kinds of information.
Our results were roughly around the same as you can see from Table 1. More details on preparing
APA-style tables and figures are presented later in the book. Perhaps there are problems with its
internal or external validity. Source: image.slidesharecdn.com Example of discussion in lab report. At
this step, it is very much important for you to provide a clear statement of the result. Posters often
include elements that add visual interest. I am truly amazed to see the extent to which you deliver
and maintain the quality standard in your writing. One way to do this is to start the Discussion with
one or two sentences that state the main finding from the results and what that finding means for the
field. Scholars can use them for free to gain inspiration and new creative ideas for their writing
assignments. Besides, a large part of what makes a research question interesting is uncertainty about
its answer. At a recent American Psychological Society Conference, nearly 2,000 posters were
presented across 16 separate poster sessions. Discussion section of dissertations interprets research
results and explains limitations of the study. A research paper typically consists of several sections,
each of which serves a specific purpose in presenting the research. It is a step where you should also
analyze the way the following limitation could influence accomplishing the aim of the research. If
two sources have the same first author, they are listed alphabetically by the last name of the second
author. It should be written in a way that the reader can understand the research procedures used,
effectively repeat them and obtain similar results. The Writing Process Step 1: Preparation Step 1
Continued: Planning with Purpose Step 1 Continued: Planning based on your Audience Step 1
Continued: Planning based on Context Step 1 Continued: Planning with a Project Calendar Step 2:
Research Step 2 Research Continued: Evaluating Your Research Step 3: Organizing with Outlines
Step 4: Drafting and Designing Step 5: Revising (or Editing) Step 6: Proofreading 1. At the end of
the meeting, the friend’s mother was asked whether she had any questions. If the study did not
satisfactorily answer the original research question, what will it take to do so. Source:
image.slidesharecdn.com To display the research data and to show trends or relationships, for
examples using graphs or gel the discussion section. Conclusion From the above article, it has been
concluded that the discussion section in the research paper consists of a problem and a summary of
key findings. It restates the research question and comments on the method. It is the genre of writing
that psychologists use to communicate about their research with other researchers and practitioners.
The current edition, however, acknowledges that subjects can still be appropriate in referring to
human participants in areas in which it has traditionally been used (e.g., basic memory research). In
Reporting and Publishing Research in the Biomedical Sciences (pp. 21-38): Springer. This works
well when both the design and the procedure are relatively complicated and each requires multiple
paragraphs. You cannot choose the first idea you see on the web or in. What are strengths and
limitations of your experimental design. In applied research—and often in basic research—there is
also some discussion of the practical implications of the research. What goes in the discussion section
of a research paper. Immediately after this is the subheading “Participants,” left justified and in
italics. Source: image.slidesharecdn.com Placing the research in context. Source: i.ytimg.com Placing
the research in context. Source: i2.wp.com Alternatively, the researcher can ask ethnographic
research questions via online surveys and questionnaires created with formplus. But you still have the
opportunity to for example, if you have completed a qualitative research project, you might have
identified some key themes within the software program you used to. Among the ideas that do not
need citations are widely shared methodological and statistical concepts (e.g., between-subjects
design, t test) and statements that are so broad that they would be difficult for anyone to argue with
(e.g., “Working memory plays a role in many daily activities.”). Be careful, though, because
“common knowledge” about human behavior is often incorrect. You need to support your results
section by providing more explanation in the discussion section about what you found. It adopts a
tone that is appropriate for communicating with professional colleagues—other researchers and
practitioners—who share an interest in the topic. Inferential Statistics: To determine whether or not
the results were statistically significant, a t-test was conducted. The participants subsection indicates
how many participants there were, the number of women and men, some indication of their age,
other demographics that may be relevant to the study, and how they were recruited, including any
incentives given for participation. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe
link in the newsletter. It typically includes a summary of the research, a discussion of theoretical and
practical implications of the study, limitations of the study, and suggestions for future research. Their
final sentence is, “If people understand the situational forces that can make them hesitate to
intervene, they may better overcome them” (p. 383). However, this kind of ending can be difficult to
pull off. The results of this experiment show that there is less chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in the
composition of the leaves that were used. Source: image.slidesharecdn.com Discussing whether the
results met your expectations or supported your hypotheses. The first is the overall organization The
most general level of APA style. Perhaps there are problems with its internal or external validity. This
statement tends to be more formal and precise than in the opening and is often expressed in terms of
operational definitions of the key variables. I am thoroughly impressed by the exceptional operation
management thesis work provided by this service. One is whether any participants or responses were
excluded from the analyses and why. Finally, qualitative research could be used to explore the
experiences of students who are struggling with stress. When reporting qualitative results, the
researcher will highlight and comment on the themes that emerge from the analysis. First, be sure to
give credit where it is deserved. At a recent American Psychological Society Conference, nearly
2,000 posters were presented across 16 separate poster sessions. The journal title and volume number
are italicized.
Technical terms must be used, but they are used to improve communication, not simply to make the
writing sound more “scientific.” For example, if participants immersed their hands in a bucket of ice
water, it is better just to write this than to write that they “were subjected to a pain-inducement
apparatus.” At the same time, however, there is no better way to communicate that a between-
subjects design was used than to use the term “between-subjects design.”. Introduction to Writing in
Engineering Overview Writing an Abstract and Introduction Writing the Methods Section Writing
the Results and Discussion Section Writing Conclusions Importance of Citations Differences Based
on Type of Engineering References Tips for Writing Tutors IV. Our titan security framework ensures
your data is secure and you even have the option to choose your own data location from Channel
Islands, London (UK), Dublin (EU), Australia. We predicted that the molecules in the leaves of the
tree attributed to the change. APA-style reference citations provide the authors’ last names and the
year of publication. (in the text) to the work in which that idea originally appeared and a full
reference to that work in the reference list. For this, we calculated that there was a peak on the graph
at the lowest points. Other researchers then circulate through the room, read the posters, and talk to
the presenters. But my teacher is also caught my little paragraph mistakes, plagiarism mistakes.
Source: slidetodoc.com Writing the results and discussion as separate sections allows you to focus
first on what results you obtained and set out clearly what happened in your if you are unsure
whether to include certain results, go back to your research questions and decide whether the results
are relevant to them. For example, one of your graphs may show a distinct trend, but not enough to
reach an acceptable do the results of the previous research help you to interpret your own findings.
Writing a discussion section is where you really begin to add your interpretations to the work. Many
presenters immediately offer to describe their research to visitors and use the poster as a visual aid.
During the fall season there is not enough sunlight for the trees to perform photosynthesis to make
their own food, what a plant needs to survive would be the Magnesium and Nitrogen that are found
in the molecular structures of chlorophyll a and b. These opening sentences provide the “transitions”
that many beginning researchers have difficulty with. By addressing this question, you can refocus
the attention on the purpose of your paper, helping readers to reach various conclusions based on the
data you collected. How to write a discussion section for a research paper. Percentage transmittance,
that the lower the number, the denser that solution is at that specific wavelength. Besides, a large
part of what makes a research question interesting is uncertainty about its answer. Many young
researchers make the mistake of formulating a research question that's either too broad or narrow.
There is still one more step in the process of conducting scientific research. Tips to Tackle
Procrastination You can end up wasting a lot of time procrastinating. The main ones are the abstract,
introduction, method, results, discussion, and references. The second approach works well when you
are discussing a general idea and especially when you want to include multiple citations for the same
idea. It will be easier for the readers to see the similarities and differences among the groups. One
way to do this is to start the Discussion with one or two sentences that state the main finding from
the results and what that finding means for the field. From this perspective, many features of APA
style that at first seem arbitrary actually make good sense. For example, whether the researcher has
received written permission from individuals before participating in the interview and the privacy of
responses. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID
found at the bottom of this page. Third, the word and (rather than an ampersand) is used to join the
authors’ names. It can also include variations in line spacing that improve readability—such as using
single spacing for table titles and figure captions or triple spacing between major sections or around
tables and figures.