bd7626f1 1907 Convention For The Pacific Settlement of International Disputes
bd7626f1 1907 Convention For The Pacific Settlement of International Disputes
17
CONVENTION
for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes*
His Majesty the German Emperor, King of Prussia; the President of the United States
of America; the President of the Argentine Republic; His Majesty the Emperor of
Austria, King of Bohemia, etc., and Apostolic King of Hungary; His Majesty the King
of the Belgians; the President of the Republic of Bolivia; the President of the Republic
of the United States of Brazil; His Royal Highness the Prince of Bulgaria; the President
of the Republic of Chile; His Majesty the Emperor of China; the President of the
Republic of Colombia; the Provisional Governor of the Republic of Cuba; His Majesty
the King of Denmark; the President of the Dominican Republic; the President of the
Republic of Ecuador; His Majesty the King of Spain; the President of the French
Republic; His Majesty the King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
of the British Dominions beyond the Seas, Emperor of India; His Majesty the King of
the Hellenes; the President of the Republic of Guatemala; the President of the Republic
of Haiti; His Majesty the King of Italy; His Majesty the Emperor of Japan; His Royal
Highness the Grand Duke of Luxembourg, Duke of Nassau; the President of the United
States of Mexico; His Royal Highness the Prince of Montenegro; the President of the
Republic of Nicaragua; His Majesty the King of Norway; the President of the Republic
of Panama; the President of the Republic of Paraguay; Her Majesty the Queen of the
Netherlands; the President of the Republic of Peru; His Imperial Majesty the Shah of
Persia; His Majesty the King of Roumania; His Majesty the Emperor of All the Russias;
the President of the Republic of Salvador; His Majesty the King of Servia; His Majesty
the King of Siam; His Majesty the King of Sweden; the Swiss Federal Council; His
Majesty the Emperor of the Ottomans; the President of the Oriental Republic of
Uruguay; the President of the United States of Venezuela;
Animated by the sincere desire to work for the maintenance of general peace;
Resolved to promote by all the efforts in their power the friendly settlement of
international disputes;
Recognizing the solidarity uniting the members of the society of civilized nations;
Desirous of extending the empire of law and of strengthening the appreciation of
international justice;
Convinced that the permanent institution of a Tribunal of Arbitration accessible to all,
in the midst of independent Powers, will contribute effectively to this result;
Having regard to the advantages attending the general and regular organization of the
procedure of arbitration;
Sharing the opinion of the august initiator of the International Peace Conference that
it is expedient to record in an International Agreement the principles of equity and right
on which are based the security of States and the welfare of peoples;
* The text of the Convention reproduced here is a translation of the French text adopted at the 1907
Peace Conference. The French-language version is authoritative.
19
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
Being desirous, with this object, of insuring the better working in practice of
Commissions of Inquiry and Tribunals of Arbitration, and of facilitating recourse to
arbitration in cases which allow of a summary procedure;
Have deemed it necessary to revise in certain particulars and to complete the work of
the First Peace Conference for the pacific settlement of international disputes;
The High Contracting Parties have resolved to conclude a new Convention for this
purpose, and have appointed the following as their Plenipotentiaries:
Who, after having deposited their full powers, found in good and due form, have
agreed upon the following:
Article 1
With a view to obviating as far as possible recourse to force in the relations between
States, the Contracting Powers agree to use their best efforts to ensure the pacific settle-
ment of international differences.
Article 2
Article 3
20
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
Article 4
The part of the mediator consists in reconciling the opposing claims and appeasing
the feelings of resentment which may have arisen between the States at variance.
Article 5
The functions of the mediator are at an end when once it is declared, either by one of
the parties to the dispute or by the mediator himself, that the means of reconciliation
proposed by him are not accepted.
Article 6
Good offices and mediation undertaken either at the request of the parties in dispute
or on the initiative of Powers strangers to the dispute have exclusively the character of
advice, and never have binding force.
Article 7
Article 8
The Contracting Powers are agreed in recommending the application, when circum-
stances allow, of special mediation in the following form:
In case of a serious difference endangering peace, the States at variance choose
respectively a Power, to which they intrust the mission of entering into direct commu-
nication with the Power chosen on the other side, with the object of preventing the
rupture of pacific relations.
For the period of this mandate, the term of which, unless otherwise stipulated, cannot
exceed thirty days, the States in dispute cease from all direct communication on the
subject of the dispute, which is regarded as referred exclusively to the mediating Powers,
which must use their best efforts to settle it.
In case of a definite rupture of pacific relations, these Powers are charged with the
joint task of taking advantage of any opportunity to restore peace.
21
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
Article 9
In disputes of an international nature involving neither honour nor vital interests, and
arising from a difference of opinion on points of facts, the Contracting Powers deem it
expedient and desirable that the parties who have not been able to come to an agreement
by means of diplomacy, should, as far as circumstances allow, institute an International
Commission of Inquiry, to facilitate a solution of these disputes by elucidating the facts
by means of an impartial and conscientious investigation.
Article 10
Article 11
If the Inquiry Convention has not determined where the Commission is to sit, it will
sit at The Hague.
The place of meeting, once fixed, cannot be altered by the Commission except with
the assent of the parties.
If the Inquiry Convention has not determined what languages are to be employed, the
question shall be decided by the Commission.
Article 12
Article 13
Should one of the Commissioners or one of the Assessors, should there be any, either
die, or resign, or be unable for any reason whatever to discharge his functions, the same
procedure is followed for filling the vacancy as was followed for appointing him.
22
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
Article 14
The parties are entitled to appoint special agents to attend the Commission of Inquiry,
whose duty it is to represent them and to act as intermediaries between them and the
Commission.
They are further authorized to engage counsel or advocates, appointed by themselves,
to state their case and uphold their interests before the Commission.
Article 15
The International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration acts as registry for the
Commissions which sit at The Hague, and shall place its offices and staff at the disposal
of the Contracting Powers for the use of the Commission of Inquiry.
Article 16
Article 17
Article 18
The Commission shall settle the details of the procedure not covered by the special
Inquiry Convention or the present Convention, and shall arrange all the formalities
required for dealing with the evidence.
Article 19
23
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
Article 20
The Commission is entitled, with the assent of the Powers, to move temporarily to any
place where it considers it may be useful to have recourse to this means of inquiry or to
send one or more of its members. Permission must be obtained from the State on whose
territory it is proposed to hold the inquiry.
Article 21
Article 22
The Commission is entitled to ask from either party for such explanations and
information as it considers necessary.
Article 23
The parties undertake to supply the Commission of Inquiry, as fully as they may think
possible, with all means and facilities necessary to enable it to become completely
acquainted with, and to accurately understand, the facts in question.
They undertake to make use of the means at their disposal, under their municipal law,
to insure the appearance of the witnesses or experts who are in their territory and have
been summoned before the Commission.
If the witnesses or experts are unable to appear before the Commission, the parties
will arrange for their evidence to be taken before the qualified officials of their own
country.
Article 24
For all notices to be served by the Commission in the territory of a third Contracting
Power, the Commission shall apply direct to the Government of the said Power. The
same rule applies in the case of steps being taken on the spot to procure evidence.
The requests for this purpose are to be executed so far as the means at the disposal of
the Power applied to under its municipal law allow. They cannot be rejected unless the
Power in question considers they are calculated to impair its sovereign rights or its
safety.
The Commission will equally be always entitled to act through the Power on whose
territory it sits.
24
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
Article 25
The witnesses and experts are summoned on the request of the parties or by the
Commission of its own motion, and, in every case, through the Government of the State
in whose territory they are.
The witnesses are heard in succession and separately in the presence of the agents and
counsel, and in the order fixed by the Commission.
Article 26
Article 27
The witness must give his evidence without being allowed to read any written draft.
He may, however, be permitted by the President to consult notes or documents if the
nature of the facts referred to necessitates their employment.
Article 28
A Minute of the evidence of the witness is drawn up forthwith and read to the witness.
The latter may make such alterations and additions as he thinks necessary, which will
be recorded at the end of his statement.
When the whole of his statement has been read to the witness, he is asked to sign it.
Article 29
The agents are authorized, in the course of or at the close of the inquiry, to present in
writing to the Commission and to the other party such statements, requisitions, or
summaries of the facts as they consider useful for ascertaining the truth.
Article 30
The Commission considers its decisions in private and the proceedings are secret.
All questions are decided by a majority of the members of the Commission.
If a member declines to vote, the fact must be recorded in the Minutes.
25
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
Article 31
The sittings of the Commission are not public, nor the Minutes and documents
connected with the inquiry published except in virtue of a decision of the Commission
taken with the consent of the parties.
Article 32
After the parties have presented all the explanations and evidence, and the witnesses
have all been heard, the President declares the inquiry terminated, and the Commission
adjourns to deliberate and to draw up its Report.
Article 33
Article 34
The Report of the Commission is read at a public sitting, the agents and counsel of the
parties being present or duly summoned.
A copy of the Report is given to each party.
Article 35
The Report of the Commission is limited to a statement of facts, and has in no way
the character of an Award. It leaves to the parties entire freedom as to the effect to be
given to the statement.
Article 36
Each party pays its own expenses and an equal share of the expenses incurred by the
Commission.
Article 37
International arbitration has for its object the settlement of disputes between States by
Judges of their own choice and on the basis of respect for law.
Recourse to arbitration implies an engagement to submit in good faith to the Award.
26
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
Article 38
Article 39
Article 40
Article 41
Article 42
The Permanent Court is competent for all arbitration cases, unless the parties agree
to institute a special Tribunal.
27
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
Article 43
Article 44
Each Contracting Power selects four persons at the most, of known competency in
questions of international law, of the highest moral reputation, and disposed to accept
the duties of Arbitrator.
The persons thus elected are inscribed, as Members of the Court, in a list which shall
be notified to all the Contracting Powers by the Bureau.
Any alteration in the list of Arbitrators is brought by the Bureau to the knowledge of
the Contracting Powers.
Two or more Powers may agree on the selection in common of one or more Members.
The same person can be selected by different Powers. The Members of the Court are
appointed for a term of six years. These appointments are renewable.
Should a Member of the Court die or resign, the same procedure is followed for filling
the vacancy as was followed for appointing him. In this case the appointment is made
for a fresh period of six years.
Article 45
When the Contracting Powers wish to have recourse to the Permanent Court for the
settlement of a difference which has arisen between them, the Arbitrators called upon
to form the Tribunal with jurisdiction to decide this difference must be chosen from the
general list of Members of the Court.
Failing the direct agreement of the parties on the composition of the Arbitration
Tribunal, the following course shall be pursued:
Each party appoints two Arbitrators, of whom one only can be its national or chosen
from among the persons selected by it as Members of the Permanent Court. These
Arbitrators together choose an Umpire.
If the votes are equally divided, the choice of the Umpire is intrusted to a third Power,
selected by the parties by common accord.
If an agreement is not arrived at on this subject each party selects a different Power,
and the choice of the Umpire is made in concert by the Powers thus selected.
If, within two months’ time, these two Powers cannot come to an agreement, each of
them presents two candidates taken from the list of Members of the Permanent Court,
28
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
exclusive of the members selected by the parties and not being nationals of either of
them. Drawing lots determines which of the candidates thus presented shall be Umpire.
Article 46
The Tribunal being thus composed, the parties notify to the Bureau their determi-
nation to have recourse to the Court, the text of their ‘Compromis’, and the names of the
Arbitrators.
The Bureau communicates without delay to each Arbitrator the ‘Compromis’, and the
names of the other members of the Tribunal.
The Tribunal assembles at the date fixed by the parties. The Bureau makes the
necessary arrangements for the meeting.
The members of the Tribunal, in the exercise of their duties and out of their own
country, enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities.
Article 47
The Bureau is authorized to place its offices and staff at the disposal of the
Contracting Powers for the use of any special Board of Arbitration.
The jurisdiction of the Permanent Court may, within the conditions laid down in the
regulations, be extended to disputes between non-Contracting Powers or between
Contracting Powers and non-Contracting Powers, if the parties are agreed on recourse
to this Tribunal.
Article 48
The Contracting Powers consider it their duty, if a serious dispute threatens to break
out between two or more of them, to remind these latter that the Permanent Court is open
to them.
Consequently, they declare that the fact of reminding the parties at variance of the
provisions of the present Convention, and the advice given to them, in the highest
interests of peace, to have recourse to the Permanent Court, can only be regarded as
friendly actions.
In case of dispute between two Powers, one of them can always address to the
International Bureau a note containing a declaration that it would be ready to submit the
dispute to arbitration.
The Bureau must at once inform the other Power of the declaration.
Article 49
29
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
It decides all questions of administration which may arise with regard to the
operations of the Court.
It has entire control over the appointment, suspension, or dismissal of the officials and
employees of the Bureau.
It fixes the payments and salaries, and controls the general expenditure.
At meetings duly summoned the presence of nine members is sufficient to render
valid the discussions of the Council. The decisions are taken by a majority of votes.
The Council communicates to the Contracting Powers without delay the regulations
adopted by it. It furnishes them with an annual Report on the labours of the Court, the
working of the administration, and the expenditure. The Report likewise contains a
résumé of what is important in the documents communicated to the Bureau by the
Powers in virtue of Article 43, paragraphs 3 and 4.
Article 50
The expenses of the Bureau shall be borne by the Contracting Powers in the
proportion fixed for the International Bureau of the Universal Postal Union.
The expenses to be charged to the adhering Powers shall be reckoned from the date
on which their adhesion comes into force.
Article 51
Article 52
The Powers which have recourse to arbitration sign a ‘Compromis’, in which the
subject of the dispute is clearly defined, the time allowed for appointing Arbitrators, the
form, order, and time in which the communication referred to in Article 63 must be
made, and the amount of the sum which each party must deposit in advance to defray the
expenses.
The ‘Compromis’ likewise defines, if there is occasion, the manner of appointing
Arbitrators, any special powers which may eventually belong to the Tribunal, where it
shall meet, the language it shall use, and the languages the employment of which shall
be authorized before it, and, generally speaking, all the conditions on which the parties
are agreed.
Article 53
The Permanent Court is competent to settle the ‘Compromis’, if the parties are agreed
to have recourse to it for the purpose.
30
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
It is similarly competent, even if the request is only made by one of the parties, when
all attempts to reach an understanding through the diplomatic channel have failed, in the
case of:
1. A dispute covered by a general Treaty of Arbitration concluded or renewed after
the present Convention has come into force, and providing for a ‘Compromis’ in all
disputes and not either explicitly or implicitly excluding the settlement of the ‘Com-
promis’ from the competence of the Court. Recourse cannot, however, be had to the
Court if the other party declares that in its opinion the dispute does not belong to the
category of disputes which can be submitted to compulsory arbitration, unless the Treaty
of Arbitration confers upon the Arbitration Tribunal the power of deciding this
preliminary question.
2. A dispute arising from contract debts claimed from one Power by another Power
as due to its nationals, and for the settlement of which the offer of arbitration has been
accepted. This arrangement is not applicable if acceptance is subject to the condition that
the ‘Compromis’ should be settled in some other way.
Article 54
In the cases contemplated in the preceding Article, the ‘Compromis’ shall be settled
by a Commission consisting of five members selected in the manner arranged for in
Article 45, paragraphs 3 to 6.
The fifth member is President of the Commission ex officio.
Article 55
Article 56
Article 57
31
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
Article 58
Article 59
Should one of the Arbitrators either die, retire, or be unable for any reason whatever
to discharge his functions, the same procedure is followed for filling the vacancy as was
followed for appointing him.
Article 60
The Tribunal sits at The Hague, unless some other place is selected by the parties.
The Tribunal can only sit in the territory of a third Power with the latter’s consent.
The place of meeting once fixed cannot be altered by the Tribunal, except with the
consent of the parties.
Article 61
If the question as to what languages are to be used has not been settled by the
‘Compromis’, it shall be decided by the Tribunal.
Article 62
The parties are entitled to appoint special agents to attend the Tribunal to act as
intermediaries between themselves and the Tribunal.
They are further authorized to retain for the defence of their rights and interests before
the Tribunal counsel or advocates appointed by themselves for this purpose.
The Members of the Permanent Court may not act as agents, counsel, or advocates
except on behalf of the Power which appointed them Members of the Court.
Article 63
As a general rule, arbitration procedure comprises two distinct phases: pleadings and
oral discussions.
The pleadings consist in the communication by the respective agents to the members
of the Tribunal and the opposite party of cases, counter-cases, and, if necessary, of
replies; the parties annex thereto all papers and documents called for in the case. This
communication shall be made either directly or through the intermediary of the Inter-
national Bureau, in the order and within the time fixed by the ‘Compromis’.
The time fixed by the ‘Compromis’ may be extended by mutual agreement by the
parties, or by the Tribunal when the latter considers it necessary for the purpose of
reaching a just decision.
32
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
The discussions consist in the oral development before the Tribunal of the arguments
of the parties.
Article 64
Article 65
Unless special circumstances arise, the Tribunal does not meet until the pleadings are
closed.
Article 66
The discussions are under the control of the President. They are only public if it be
so decided by the Tribunal, with the assent of the parties.
They are recorded in minutes drawn up by the Secretaries appointed by the President.
These minutes are signed by the President and by one of the Secretaries and alone have
an authentic character.
Article 67
After the close of the pleadings, the Tribunal is entitled to refuse discussion of all new
papers or documents which one of the parties may wish to submit to it without the
consent of the other party.
Article 68
The Tribunal is free to take into consideration new papers or documents to which its
attention may be drawn by the agents or counsel of the parties.
In this case, the Tribunal has the right to require the production of these papers or
documents, but is obliged to make them known to the opposite party.
Article 69
The Tribunal can, besides, require from the agents of the parties the production of all
papers, and can demand all necessary explanations. In case of refusal the Tribunal takes
note of it.
Article 70
The agents and the counsel of the parties are authorized to present orally to the
Tribunal all the arguments they may consider expedient in defence of their case.
33
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
Article 71
They are entitled to raise objections and points. The decisions of the Tribunal on these
points are final and cannot form the subject of any subsequent discussion.
Article 72
The members of the Tribunal are entitled to put questions to the agents and counsel
of the parties, and to ask them for explanations on doubtful points.
Neither the questions put, nor the remarks made by members of the Tribunal in the
course of the discussions, can be regarded as an expression of opinion by the Tribunal
in general or by its members in particular.
Article 73
Article 74
The Tribunal is entitled to issue rules of procedure for the conduct of the case, to
decide the forms, order, and time in which each party must conclude its arguments, and
to arrange all the formalities required for dealing with the evidence.
Article 75
The parties undertake to supply the Tribunal, as fully as they consider possible, with
all the information required for deciding the case.
Article 76
For all notices which the Tribunal has to serve in the territory of a third Contracting
Power, the Tribunal shall apply direct to the Government of that Power. The same rule
applies in the case of steps being taken to procure evidence on the spot.
The requests for this purpose are to be executed as far as the means at the disposal of
the Power applied to under its municipal law allow. They cannot be rejected unless the
Power in question considers them calculated to impair its own sovereign rights or its
safety.
The Court will equally be always entitled to act through the Power on whose territory
it sits.
34
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
Article 77
When the agents and counsel of the parties have submitted all the explanations and
evidence in support of their case the President shall declare the discussion closed.
Article 78
The Tribunal considers its decisions in private and the proceedings remain secret.
All questions are decided by a majority of the members of the Tribunal.
Article 79
The Award must give the reasons on which it is based. It contains the names of the
Arbitrators; it is signed by the President and Registrar or by the Secretary acting as
Registrar.
Article 80
The Award is read out in public sitting, the agents and counsel of the parties being
present or duly summoned to attend.
Article 81
The Award, duly pronounced and notified to the agents of the parties, settles the
dispute definitively and without appeal.
Article 82
Any dispute arising between the parties as to the interpretation and execution of the
Award shall, in the absence of an Agreement to the contrary, be submitted to the
Tribunal which pronounced it.
Article 83
The parties can reserve in the ‘Compromis’ the right to demand the revision of the
Award.
In this case and unless there be an Agreement to the contrary, the demand must be
addressed to the Tribunal which pronounced the Award. It can only be made on the
ground of the discovery of some new fact calculated to exercise a decisive influence
upon the Award and which was unknown to the Tribunal and to the party which
demanded the revision at the time the discussion was closed.
Proceedings for revision can only be instituted by a decision of the Tribunal expressly
recording the existence of the new fact, recognizing in it the character described in the
preceding paragraph, and declaring the demand admissible on this ground.
35
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
The ‘Compromis’ fixes the period within which the demand for revision must be
made.
Article 84
Article 85
Each party pays its own expenses and an equal share of the expenses of the Tribunal.
Article 86
Article 87
Each of the parties in dispute appoints an Arbitrator. The two Arbitrators thus selected
choose an Umpire. If they do not agree on this point, each of them proposes two
candidates taken from the general list of the Members of the Permanent Court exclusive
of the members appointed by either of the parties and not being nationals of either of
them; which of the candidates thus proposed shall be the Umpire is determined by lot.
The Umpire presides over the Tribunal, which gives its decisions by a majority of
votes.
Article 88
In the absence of any previous agreement the Tribunal, as soon as it is formed, settles
the time within which the two parties must submit their respective cases to it.
Article 89
Each party is represented before the Tribunal by an agent, who serves as intermediary
between the Tribunal and the Government who appointed him.
36
1907 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
Article 90
The proceedings are conducted exclusively in writing. Each party, however, is entitled
to ask that witnesses and experts should be called. The Tribunal has, for its part, the right
to demand oral explanations from the agents of the two parties, as well as from the
experts and witnesses whose appearance in Court it may consider useful.
Article 91
The present Convention, duly ratified, shall replace, as between the Contracting
Powers, the Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes of the 29th
July, 1899.
Article 92
Article 93
Non-Signatory Powers which have been invited to the Second Peace Conference may
adhere to the present Convention.
The Power which desires to adhere notifies its intention in writing to the Netherlands
Government, forwarding to it the act of adhesion, which shall be deposited in the
archives of the said Government.
This Government shall immediately forward to all the other Powers invited to the
Second Peace Conference a duly certified copy of the notification as well as of the act
of adhesion, mentioning the date on which it received the notification.
37
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION – BASIC DOCUMENTS
Article 94
The conditions on which the Powers which have not been invited to the Second Peace
Conference may adhere to the present Convention shall form the subject of a subsequent
Agreement between the Contracting Powers.
Article 95
The present Convention shall take effect, in the case of the Powers which were not
a party to the first deposit of ratifications, sixty days after the date of the procès-verbal
of this deposit, and, in the case of the Powers which ratify subsequently or which adhere,
sixty days after the notification of their ratification or of their adhesion has been received
by the Netherlands Government.
Article 96
In the event of one of the Contracting Parties wishing to denounce the present
Convention, the denunciation shall be notified in writing to the Netherlands Government,
which shall immediately communicate a duly certified copy of the notification to all the
other Powers informing them of the date on which it was received.
The denunciation shall only have effect in regard to the notifying Power, and one year
after the notification has reached the Netherlands Government.
Article 97
A register kept by the Netherlands Minister for Foreign Affairs shall give the date of
the deposit of ratifications effected in virtue of Article 92, paragraphs 3 and 4, as well
as the date on which the notifications of adhesion (Article 93, paragraph 2) or of
denunciation (Article 96, paragraph 1) have been received.
Each Contracting Power is entitled to have access to this register and to be supplied
with duly certified extracts from it.
In faith whereof the Plenipotentiaries have appended their signatures to the present
Convention.
Done at The Hague, the 18th October, 1907, in a single copy, which shall remain
deposited in the archives of the Netherlands Government, and duly certified copies of
which shall be sent, through the diplomatic channel, to the Contracting Powers.
38