Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BCJ Two-Pager On FAINSFA
BCJ Two-Pager On FAINSFA
The bill would close the data broker loophole by prohibiting government purchases
of Americans’ sensitive data.
The Problem
Privacy laws in this country are badly outdated, creating gaps that data brokers and government
agencies can exploit. For instance, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act prohibits phone and
internet companies from selling sensitive customer data to government agencies. But the law doesn’t
address digital data brokers because they barely existed in 1986, when the law was passed. Companies
that are barred from selling data to the government can thus sell to data brokers instead, and the brokers
can sell the same data to the government—for a handsome profit. The data is effectively laundered
through a middleman.
The government is even buying its way around the Fourth Amendment. In 2018, the Supreme Court held
that the government needs a warrant to obtain cell phone location records because they can reveal highly
sensitive information about our private lives. But government lawyers interpret this ruling to apply only
when the government compels disclosure of the records—not when it merely incentives disclosure by
writing a big check. Federal agencies are thus buying up massive databases of Americans’ cell phone
location information without any legal process whatsoever, let alone a warrant.
The facts are sobering:
• The list of federal agencies that reportedly have bought access to Fourth Amendment-protected data
includes the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, multiple components of the Department of
Homeland Security (including Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, and the Secret Service), and the Department of Defense. Even the Internal Revenue
Service “attempted to identify and track potential criminal suspects by purchasing access to a
commercial database that records the locations of millions of American cellphones.”
• Data brokers collect and sell information about activities protected by the U.S. and/or state
constitutions. For instance, brokers have sold location information of people visiting abortion
providers and could easily do the same for people visiting gun stores.
• The Department of Defense purchased “granular location data” harvested from a popular Muslim
prayer app used by 98 million people around the world, including Americans, as well as similar data
generated by a Muslim dating app.
• The NSA has confirmed that it purchases information about Americans’ internet activity from data
brokers. This includes “netflow data,” i.e., communications metadata, including for wholly domestic
communications. Communications metadata can reveal a person’s associations, habits, and even
beliefs.
• A DHS Inspector General report revealed that CBP, ICE, and the Secret Service purchased
communications information without complying with DHS privacy policies or performing statutorily
required Privacy Impact Assessments.
• A working group commissioned by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued the
ominous warning that no one in the intelligence community knows precisely what information has
been purchased or how it is used.
The Solution
The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act would prohibit law enforcement and intelligence agencies
from purchasing certain sensitive information from third-party sellers, including geolocation information,
communications-related information that is protected under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act,
and information obtained through illegitimate scraping practices. Law enforcement and intelligence
agencies would still be able to obtain the information using a warrant, court order, or subpoena, as
provided by law.
This solution has broad bipartisan and popular support. The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act was
reported out of the House Judiciary Committee by a unanimous vote (with just one member voting
“present”). Recent polling shows that 80% of Americans support requiring the government to obtain a
warrant before purchasing location information, internet records, and other sensitive data about
Americans.
For questions about the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act, contact Liza Goitein at
[email protected] or Emile Ayoub at [email protected].