The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies 1St Edition Ian Brittain Ebook Full Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies 1St Edition Ian Brittain Ebook Full Chapter
Edited by
Ian Brittain and Aaron Beacom
The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies
Ian Brittain • Aaron Beacom
Editors
The Palgrave
Handbook of
Paralympic Studies
Editors
Ian Brittain Aaron Beacom
Centre for Business in Society University of St Mark and St John
Coventry University Plymouth, United Kingdom
Coventry, United Kingdom
v
Contents
1 Introduction 1
Ian Brittain and Aaron Beacom
vii
viii Contents
23 Sochi 2014 507
Evgeny Bukharov
30 Concluding Thoughts 665
Aaron Beacom and Ian Brittain
Index 673
List of Figures
Fig. 6.1 Tree map of attitudes expressed through tweets including the
hashtag #Paralympics on September 13, 2016—visualised
through Netlytic categories 112
Fig. 6.2 Tree map of ‘positive’ attitudes expressed through tweets
including the hashtag #Paralympics on September 13,
2016—visualised through Netlytic categories 113
Fig. 6.3 Social network visualisation of #Paralympics Twitter
conversation114
Fig. 7.1 Participation at the summer Paralympic Games 139
Fig. 9.1 IPC governance chart 174
Fig. 10.1 Organising committee structure 204
Fig. 12.1 The SPLISS model: theoretical model of nine pillars of sports
policy factors influencing international success (De Bosscher
et al. 2006, 2015) 256
Fig. 14.1 Number of athletes attending the National Games for Disabled
Persons by games 309
Fig. 14.2 Main Chinese economic indicators (1986–2014) 310
Fig. 14.3 Mass sports data (by province) 313
Fig. 23.1 Organisation chart of the Paralympic Games Integration and
Coordination Department 513
Plate 1 IPC seminar in South Korea (PyeongChang Winter Olympics
Organising Committee) 563
xi
List of Tables
xiii
xiv List of Tables
Table 11.2 The number and gender of athletes at the Olympic Games
from 1960 to 2016 225
Table 11.3 Sports open to women at the Paralympic Games from
1960 to 2016 226
Table 11.4 Sports, year introduced and disability category 1960–2016 227
Table 11.5 Disability disparity between high- and low-income countries 233
Table 13.1 Overview of the IPC’s/PM involvement and relationship
with the UN with regard to the Sport for Development
Movement since 2000 283
Table 14.1 Results of Statistics on China’s participation in Summer
Paralympics296
Table 14.2 National Games for disabled persons in China 305
Table 14.3 National Special Olympics Games 305
Table 14.4 Per capita disposable income of urban residents
(grouped by regions) 311
Table 14.5 Per capita disposable income of rural residents
(grouped by regions) 311
Table 14.6 Development of sports for people with disabilities (by province) 313
Table 14.7 Organisational structure of disabled sports in China 315
Table 15.1 African nations participating by year (excluding South Africa) 335
Table 16.1 Olympic and Paralympic diplomacy: structure and agency
(adapted from Beacom and Brittain 2016) 351
Table 18.1 A history of important events in Paralympic classification 392
Table 18.2 Descriptions of the physical impairment types eligible to
compete in Paralympic sport 395
Table 18.3 The general structure of the current Paralympic classification
process396
Table 18.4 Descriptions of the research required in each step towards
the development of evidence-based systems of classification 400
Table 18.5 An abridged version of the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based
Medicine—Levels of evidence hierarchy 401
Table 19.1 Comparison of INAS world records and non-impaired
world records 427
Table 22.1 Scale of development of the Paralympic Games (1960–2012) 486
Table 23.1 Main parameters (estimated) of the 2014 Paralympic Games 514
Table 24.1 A comparison of Brazil’s final position in the medal table
at the last eight Olympic and Paralympic Games 535
Table 25.1 IPC excellence programme (Special Olympics Korea n.d.) 565
1
Introduction
Ian Brittain and Aaron Beacom
I. Brittain (*)
Coventry University, Coventry, UK
A. Beacom
University of St Mark and St John, Plymouth, UK
parasport by describing the origins and different purposes of the two main
organisations supporting these athletes, the Special Olympics organisation
and the International Association for Para-athletes with Intellectual Disabilities
(INAS). She also highlights the reasons for the exclusion, and then re-
inclusion, of athletes with intellectual disabilities in the Paralympic Games.
Gregor Wolbring states that one of the most consequential advances in sci-
ence and technology is the increasing generation of human bodily enhance-
ment products in many shapes and forms that enable a culture of, demand
for, and acceptance of improving and modifying the human body. In 2016, a
Cyborg Olympics, a Championship for Athletes with Disabilities, took place
in Zurich, Switzerland. Wolbring interrogates the media coverage of the
Cybathlon and highlights how the narrative around the event poses various
problems for Paralympic values. Mike McNamee and Richard J Parnell con-
clude this section by examining the four stated values of the International
Paralympic Committee, namely courage, determination, equality and inspira-
tion, and challenging them by reference to a number of prominent ethical
issues in Paralympic sport. They conclude by endeavouring to offer a tentative
definition of ‘Paralympism’ based on the discussion and interrelation between
ethics and Paralympic values, something that so far no author has really
attempted, despite fairly regular use of the term by several authors.
Section five adopts a case study approach to analyse the experience of a suc-
cession of recent and impending Paralympic Games. A broadly similar frame-
work is used for each chapter, enabling some degree of comparison of
experiences within the 2012, 2014 and 2016 Games. In the case of the 2018
and 2020 Games, the approach enables consideration of common problems
and issues faced during the preparatory phases. The chapters provide unique
insights provided by senior practitioners and academics, of experiences on the
ground. Collectively, they provide pointers to the trajectory and learning
experience of the Paralympic Games generally and what lessons can be learned
from that process. Based upon his completed PhD studies, Shane Kerr claims
that London 2012 has reached paradigmatic status for the way that it organ-
ised the Paralympic Games and sought to leverage its legacy potential.
Beginning with an analysis of London 2012’s bid, the chapter examines the
position and role of key stakeholders including the organising committee, the
UK government, corporate sponsors and Channel 4, the television broad-
caster in the perceived success of the London 2012 Paralympic Games. From
his perspective as the Paralympic Games Integration & Coordination Director
for the Sochi 2014 winter Paralympic Games, Evgeny Bukharov describes
the preparation and staging of the first ever Paralympic Winter Games in
Russia, which he claims has brought positive changes in the social perception
8 I. Brittain and A. Beacom
Pappous and Chris Brown introduce the concept of legacy in relation to the
Paralympic Games through a critical review of the legacy themes from the
2004 to 2016 Summer Paralympic Games.
References
Active Policy Solutions. n.d. Know Your Rights: Disability in Sports. www.activepoli-
cysolutions.com/know-your-rights-in-disability-sports/. Accessed 16 March
2017.
Adair, Daryl. 2013. Sport Race, Ethnicity and Identity: Building a Global Understanding.
London: Routledge.
Allison, L., ed. 1993. The Changing Politics of Sport. Manchester: Manchester
University Press.
Bailey, S. 2008. Athlete First: A History of the Paralympic Movement. Chichester: John
Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Beacom, Aaron. 2012. International Diplomacy and the Olympic Movement: The New
Mediators. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brittain, I. 2004. Perceptions of Disability and Their Impact upon Involvement in
Sport for People with Disabilities at All Levels. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 28
(4): 429–452.
———. 2014. From Stoke Mandeville to Sochi: A History of the Summer and Winter
Paralympic Games. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.
———. 2016. The Paralympic Games Explained (Second Edition). London: Routledge.
Bundon and Clark. 2014. Honey or Vinegar? Athletes with Disabilities Discuss
Strategies for Advocacy Within the Paralympic Movement. Journal of Sport and
Social Issues 30 (5): 351–370.
Burkett, B. 2010. Technology in Paralympic Sport: Performance Enhancement or
Essential for Performance? British Journal of Sports Medicine 44: 215–220.
Cashmore, Ellis. 2000. Making Sense of Sport. London: Routledge.
DePauw, K.P., and S.J. Gavron. 1995. Disability and Sport. 1st ed. Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics.
Espy, Richard. 1979. The Politics of the Olympic Games. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press.
Girginov, Vassil, ed. 2013. Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic
Games, Volume One: Making the Games. London: Routledge.
Guttmann, Alan. 1978. From Ritual to Record. New York, NY: Columbia University
Press.
———. 1992. The Olympics: A History of the Modern Games. Champaign, IL:
University of Illinois Press.
Hazan, Baruch. 1982. Olympic Sports and the Propaganda Games. New Brunswick:
Transaction Publishers.
10 I. Brittain and A. Beacom
Hill, Christopher. 1996. Olympic Politics: Athens to Atlanta. 2nd ed. Manchester:
Manchester University Press.
Hoberman, John. 1986. The Olympic Crisis: Sport, Politics and the Moral Order.
New York, NY: A. D. Caratzas.
Holt, Richard. 1989. Sport and the British: A Modern History. Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
Howe, David. 2008. The Cultural Politics of the Paralympic Movement: Through an
Anthropological Lense. London: Routledge.
IOC. 2015. Academic Olympic Papers. Available Online. Olympic Studies Centre.
https://stillmed.olympic.oorg/AssetsDocs/OSC%20Section/pdf/Annex%20
5%20-%202011%Academic%20papers%20available%20online.pdf. Accessed
16 March 2017.
IPC Website. 2017. Rio 2016 Paralympic Games. https://www.paralympic.org/rio-
2016. Accessed 16 March 2017.
Jarvie, G. 2012. Sport, Culture and Society: An Introduction. second ed. London:
Routledge.
Jefferson Lenskji, Helen, and Stephen Wagg, eds. 2012. The Palgrave Handbook of
Olympic Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kanin, David. 1981. A Political History of the Olympic Games. Boulder, CO: Westview
Press.
Kaplanidou, Kiki, and Kostas Karadakis. 2010. Understanding the Legacies of a Host
Olympic City: The Case of the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Games. Sport Marketing
Quarterly 19 (2): 110–117.
Kidd, B. 2008. A New Social Movement: Sport for Development and Peace. Sport in
Society 11 (4): 370–380.
Laureus. n.d. Development of Sports and Rights for People with Disabilities. https://
www.laureus.com/projects/africa/development-sports-and-rights-people-
disabilities. Accessed 16 March 2017.
LaVaque-Manty, M. 2005. Equal Opportunity to Meaningful Competitions:
Disability Rights and Justice in Sports. Disability Studies Quarterly 25 (3). http://
www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/573/750.
Legg, D., and K. Gilbert. 2011. Paralympic Legacies. Champaign, IL: Common
Ground Publishing.
MacAloon, J. 2007. This Great Symbol: Pierre de Coubertin and the Origins of the
Modern Olympic Games. London: Routledge.
Maguire, J. 1999. Global Sport: Identities, Societies, Civilizations. Oxford: Polity.
Malcolm, Dominic. 2012. Sport and Sociology. London: Routledge.
Mandell, Richard. 1984. Sport: A Cultural History. New York, NY: Columbia
University Press.
Müller, N., ed. 2000. Pierre de Coubertin (1867–1937): Olympism (Selected Writings).
Lausanne: IOC.
Pfister, Gertrud, and Mari Sisjord. 2013. Gender and Sport: Changes and Challenges.
Münster: Waxmann Verlag GmbH.
Introduction 11
Schantz, O.J., and K. Gilbert. 2012. Heroes or Zeroes? The Media’s Perceptions of
Paralympic Sport. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.
Spaaij, R. 2012. Olympic Rings of Peace? The Olympic Movement, Peacemaking
and Intercultural Understanding. Sport in Society 15 (6): 761–774.
Swartz, L., and B. Watermeyer. 2008. Cyborg Anxiety: Oscar Pistorius and the
Boundaries of What It Means to Be Human. Disability and Society 23 (2):
187–190.
Thomas, N., and A. Smith. 2008. Disability, Sport and Society: An Introduction.
London: Routledge.
United Nations. 2006. UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-
persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.
html. Accessed 16 March 2017.
Wavlin, T. 1984. Sport, Social History and the Historian. The International Journal of
the History of Sport 1 (1): 5–13.
Zettler, P.J. 2009. Is It Cheating to Use Cheetahs? The Implications of Technologically
Innovative Prostheses for Sports Values and Rules. Boston University International
Law Journal 27: 367–409.
Ian Brittain, PhD, is a Research Fellow in the Centre for Business in Society,
Coventry University, UK. He is an internationally recognised expert in the study of
disability and Paralympic sport. He is also the Heritage Advisor to the International
Wheelchair and Amputee Sports Federation, who, in a former guise, founded the
Paralympic Games, and he has attended every summer Paralympic Games since
Sydney 2000.
The purpose of this chapter is to critically examine how we might explain and
understand disability. Having a grasp on how disability can be explained and
understood is vital for anyone working with disabled people in sport. This is
because there are numerous ways to explain and understand disability and
each way can, in turn, have profoundly different implications for sport, the
lives of disabled people, and society at large. For example, how someone
understands disability will, either implicitly or explicitly, inform what is pri-
oritised to enhance athletic performance, what is left out in the pursuit of
Paralympic medals, how athletes are supported over their life course, how
research is carried out, how impaired bodies are represented in sporting organ-
isations, the media, policy, and research, who and what is targeted in efforts
to improve health, equity and equality, and how the damage often done to
disabled people is undone.
Having an informed grasp on how disability can be understood is not,
however, easy or straightforward. In part, this is because there are an increas-
ing variety of ways to understand disability and no consensus on a way for-
ward. Given this, we concentrate efforts by first outlining four models of
disability. These are the medical model, the UK social model, the social rela-
tional model, and the human rights model of disability. The medical model
B. Smith (*)
University of Birmingham, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences,
Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
A. Bundon
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
and the social model are selected because, as Fitzgerald (2012) noted in her
sport research, “contemporary understandings of disability have come to be
understood through two key models of disability, the medical and social mod-
els” (p. 244). The social relational model and the human rights model are
focused on as together they begin to map some of the more emerging ways
that disability might be productively understood within the context of sport
and physical activity. After attending to each of the four models in turn, the
chapter offers additional future directions for understanding disability, sport,
and physical activity.
How societies divide ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ bodies is central to the production
and sustenance of what it means to be human in society. It defines access to
nations and communities. It determines choice and participation in civic life. It
determines what constitutes ‘rational’ men and women and who should have
the right to be part of society and who should not. (p. 65)
iscrimination acts around the world, including in the UK, France, and
d
America. Although certainly not perfect or always followed, these acts mean
that disabled people in numerous countries should now legally have equal
access to gyms, sport clubs, sporting stadiums, employment, and so on. When
disabled people encounter the social model, the effect can also be revelatory
and liberatory. Rather than seeing themselves as the ‘problem’ and the ‘solu-
tion’ traced to their own individual body, disabled people have been empow-
ered by the social model to recognise that society is often the problem and
that the removal of social barriers to their inclusion and participation in social
life is what is needed.
Within the context of sport, physical activity and leisure studies, the social
model has been drawn on to explain and understand disability. For example,
Tregaskis (2004) provided some practical examples of how the social model
can and has been used by disabled people to engage mainstream organisations
and practitioners that were operating within individualised (medicalised)
models of disability. She suggested that, because the social model focuses on
external barriers to access and inclusion, it can depersonalise access issues and
thus create an environment where the disabled and the non-disabled can work
collaboratively to design more inclusive programmes without resorting to fin-
ger pointing, blaming or an ‘us’ versus ‘them’ mentality. In their research,
Huang and Brittain (2006) likewise highlighted that many of the athletes
they interviewed drew on social model understandings of disability and com-
mented on various externally imposed barriers, be they environmental restric-
tions or those brought about by prejudice, that served to shape their sport
experiences. More recently, in a review of disability sport literature, Smith and
Sparkes (2012) noted that the ideas supporting the social model had been
evoked to explain limited participation rates in disabled sport at community
and recreational levels.
The social model also appears in the literature pertaining to the Paralympic
Games and the Paralympic Movement. For example, Howe (2008) explained,
that at least in the early years of the event, the Paralympic Games were often
portrayed as regressive in the context of the disability rights movements that
helped to create and advance the social model. The criticism was that sport,
with its unapologetic emphasis on bodily perfection, reproduced rather than
challenged the medicalised view of disability that the disabled people’s organ-
isations had fought so hard to reject. The result is what Purdue and Howe
(2012) have termed the “Paralympic paradox” (p. 194). This refers to the
tenuous position occupied by impaired athletes as they are pressured to show-
case their athleticism (distancing themselves from devalued, disabled identi-
ties) to able-bodied audiences and to simultaneously perform as athletes with
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The officer now drew near the individual he was ordered to remove;
but he did so as if a little afraid of his man—who stood up face to
face with the judge, and planted his foot as if he knew of no power
on earth able to move him, declaring he would’nt budge a peg, now
they’d come to that; for the house they were in had been paid for out
of the people’s money, and he’d as much right there as they had; but
havin’ said what he had to say on the subject, and bein’ pooty
considr’ble easy on that score now, if they’d mind their business he’d
mind his; and if they’d behave, he would.
Very well, said the chief judge, who knew the man to be a soldier of
tried bravery. Very well! you may stay where you are; I thought we
should bring you to your senses, neighbour Joe.
Here the stranger broke away from the crowd and leaped upon the
platform, and setting his teeth and smiting the floor with a heavy iron-
shod staff, he asked the judges why they did not enforce the order?
why with courage to take away life, they had no courage to defend
their authority. How dare ye forgive this man! said he; how dare you
bandy words with such a fellow! What if you have been to the war
with him? Have ye not become the judges of the land? With
hardihood enough to undertake the awful representation of majesty,
have ye not enough to secure that majesty from outrage?
We know our own duty sir.
No such thing sir! you do not—if you do, it shall be the worse for you.
You are afraid of that man—
Afraid sir!—Who are you!
Yes—you are afraid of that man. If you are not, why allow him to
disturb the gravity of such an hour as this? Know your own power—
Bid the High-sheriff take him into custody.
A laugh here from the sturdy yeoman, who having paid his quota for
building the house, and fought his share of the fight with the Indians,
felt as free as the best of them.
Speak but the word, Sirs, and I will do what I see your officer hath
not valor enough to do. Speak but the word, Sirs! and I that know
your power, will obey it, (uplifting the staff as he spoke, while the fire
flashed from his eyes, and the crowd gave way on every side as if it
were the tomahawk or the bow of a savage)—speak but the word I
say! and I will strike him to the earth!
George Burroughs—I pray thee! said a female, who sat in a dark
part of the house with her head so muffled up that nobody could see
her face—I pray thee, George! do not strike thy brother in wrath.
Speak but the word I say, and lo! I will stretch him at your feet, if he
refuse to obey me, whatever may be the peril to me or mine.
I should like to see you do it, said the man. I care as little for you, my
boy,—throwing off his outer-garb as he spoke, and preparing for a
trial of strength on the spot—as little for you, George Burroughs, if
that is your name, as I do for your master.
Will you not speak! You see how afraid of him they all are, judges;
you know how long he has braved your authority—being a soldier
forsooth. Speak, if ye are wise; for if ye do not—
George! George!... No, no, George! said somebody at his elbow,
with a timid voice, that appeared to belong to a child.
The uplifted staff dropped from his hand.
CHAPTER VI.
Here the venerable Increase Mather stood up, and after a short
speech to the people and a few words to the court, he begged to
know if the individual he saw before him was indeed the George
Burroughs who had formerly been a servant of God.
Formerly, sir! I am so now, I hope.
The other sat down, with a look of inquietude.
You appear to be much perplexed about me. You appear even to
doubt the truth of what I say. Surely ... surely ... there are some here
that know me. I know you, Doctor Mather, and you, Sir William
Phips, and you ... and you ... and you; addressing himself to many
that stood near—it is but the other day that we were associated
together; and some of us in the church, and others in the ministry; it
is but the other day that—
Here the Judges began to whisper together.
—That you knew me as well as I knew you. Can I be so changed in
a few short years? They have been years of sorrow to be sure, of
uninterrupted sorrow, of trial and suffering, warfare and wo; but I did
not suppose they had so changed me, as to make it over-hard for my
very brothers in the church to know me—
It is Burroughs, I do believe, said another of the judges.—But who is
that boy with you, and by what authority are you abroad again, or
alive, I might say, if you are the George Burroughs that we knew?
By what authority, Judges of Israel! By authority of the Strong Man
who broke loose when the spirit of the Lord was upon him! By
authority of one that hath plucked me up out of the sea, by the hair of
my head, breathed into my nostrils the breath of new life, and
endowed me with great power—
The people drew back.
You have betrayed me; I will be a hostage for you no longer.
Betrayed you!
Yes! and ye would have betrayed me to death, if I had not been
prepared for your treachery—
The man is mad, brother Sewall.
You have broken the treaty I stood pledged for; you have not been at
peace for a day. You do not keep your faith. We do keep ours. You
are churchmen ... we are savages; we I say, for you made me
ashamed years and years ago of my relationship to the white man;
years and years ago! and you are now in a fair way to make me the
mortal and perpetual foe of the white man. The brave Iroquois are
now ready for battle with you. War they find to be better than peace
with such as you—
Who is that boy?
Ask him. Behold his beauty. Set him face to face, if you dare, with
the girl that spoke to the knife just now.
And wherefore? said one of the jury.
Wherefore, Jacob Elliot—wherefore! Stay you in that box, and watch
the boy, and hear what he has to say, and you shall be satisfied of
the wherefore.
Be quick Sir. We have no time to lose—
No time to lose—How dare ye! Is there indeed such power with you;
such mighty power ... and you not afraid in the exercise of it! No time
to lose! Hereafter, when you are upon your death-bed, when every
moment of your life is numbered as every moment of her life is now
... the poor creature that stands there, what will you say if the words
of that very speech ring in your ears? Believe me—there is no such
hurry. It will be time enough to-morrow, judges, a week hence or a
whole year to shed the blood of a miserable woman for witchcraft.
For witchcraft! alas for the credulity of man! alas for the very nature
of man!
Master Burroughs! murmured a compassionate-looking old man,
reaching over to lay his hand on his arm, as if to stop him, and
shaking his head as he spoke.
Oh but I do pity you; sages though you are—continued Burroughs,
without regarding the interposition.—For witchcraft! I wonder how
you are able to keep your countenances! Do you not perceive that
mother Good, as they call her, cannot be a witch?
How so? asked the judge.
Would she abide your search, your trial, your judgment, if she had
power to escape?
Assuredly not brother, answered a man, who rose up as he spoke as
if ready to dispute before the people, if permitted by the judges ...
assuredly not, brother, if she had power to escape. We agree with
you there. But we know that a period must arrive when the power
that is paid for with the soul, the power of witchcraft and sorcery shall
be withdrawn. We read of this and we believe it; and I might say that
we see the proof now before us—
Brother, I marvel at you—
—If the woman be unexpectedly deserted by the Father of lies, and if
we pursue our advantage now, we may be able both to succeed with
her and overthrow him, and thereby (lowering his voice and stooping
toward Burroughs) and thereby deter a multitude more from entering
into the league of death.
Speak low ... lower—much lower, deacon Darby, or we shall be no
match for the Father of lies: If he should happen to overhear you, the
game is up, said another.
For shame, Elder Smith—
For shame! cried Burroughs. Why rebuke his levity, when if we are to
put faith in what you say, ye are preparing to over-reach the Evil One
himself? You must play a sure game, (for it is a game) if you hope to
convict him of treachery in a case, where according to what you
believe, his character is at stake.
Brother Burroughs!
Brother Willard!
Forbear, I beseech you.
I shall not forbear. If the woman is a witch, how do you hope to
surprise her? ... to entrap her? ... to convict her? And if she is not a
witch, how can she hope to go free? None but a witch could escape
your toils.
Ah Sir.... Sir! O, Mr. Burroughs! cried the poor woman. There you
have spoken the truth sir; there you have said just what I wanted to
say. I knew it.... I felt it.... I knew that if I was guilty it would be better
for me, than to be what you know me to be, and what your dead wife
knew me to be, and both of your dead wives, for I knew them both—
a broken-hearted poor old woman. God forever bless you Sir!
whatever may become of me—however this may end, God forever
bless you, Sir!
Be of good faith Sarah. He whom you serve will be nigh to you and
deliver you.
Oh Sir—Sir—Do not talk so. They misunderstand you—they are
whispering together—it will be the death of me; and hereafter, it may
perhaps be a trouble to you. Speak out, I beseech you! Say to them
whom it is that you mean, whom it is that I serve, and who it is that
will be nigh to me and deliver me.
Who it is, poor heart! why whom should it be but our Father above!
our Lord and our God, Sarah? Have thou courage, and be of good
cheer, and put all thy trust in him, for he hath power to deliver thee.
I have—I do—I am no longer afraid of death sir. If they put me to
death now—I do not wish to live—I am tired and sick of life, and I
have been so ever since dear boy and his poor father—I told them
how it would be if they went away when the moon was at the full—
they were shipwrecked on the shore just underneath the window of
my chamber—if they put me to death now, I shall die satisfied, for I
shall not go to my grave now, as I thought I should before you came,
without a word or a look of pity, nor any thing to make me
comfortable.
Judges—may the boy speak?
Speak? speak? to be sure he may, muttered old Mr. Wait Winthrop,
addressing himself to a preacher who sat near with a large Bible
outspread upon his knees. What say you? what say you Brother
Willard, what says the Book?—no harm there, I hope; what can he
have to say though, (wiping his eyes) what can such a lad have to
say? What say you major Gidney; what say you—(half sobbing)
dreadful affair this, dreadful affair; what can he possibly have to say?
Not much, I am afraid, replied Burroughs, not very much; but enough
I hope and believe, to shake your trust in the chief accuser. Robert
Eveleth—here—this way—shall the boy be sworn, Sir?
Sworn—sworn?—to be sure—why not? very odd though—very—
very—swear the boy—very odd, I confess—never saw a likelier boy
of his age—how old is he?
Thirteen Sir—
Very—very—of his height, I should say—what can he know of the
matter though? what can such a boy know of—of—however—we
shall see—is the boy sworn?—there, there—
The boy stepped forth as the kind-hearted old man—too kind-
hearted for a judge—concluded his perplexing soliloquy, one part of
which was given out with a very decided air, while another was
uttered with a look of pitiable indecision—stepped forth and lifted up
his right hand according to the law of that people, with his large grey
eyes lighted up and his fine yellow hair blowing about his head like a
glory, and swore by the Everlasting God, the Searcher of Hearts, to
speak the truth.
Every eye was riveted upon him, for he stood high upon a sort of
stage, in full view of everybody, and face to face to all who had
sworn to the spectre-knife, and his beauty was terrible.
Stand back, stand back ... what does that child do there? said
another of the judges, pointing to a poor little creature with a pale
anxious face and very black hair, who had crept close up to the side
of Robert Eveleth, and sat there with her eyes lifted to his, and her
sweet lips apart, as if she were holding her breath.
Why, what are you afeard of now, Bridgee Pope? said another voice.
Get away from the boy’s feet, will you ... why don’t you move? ... do
you hear me?
No ... I do not, she replied.
You do not! what did you answer me for, if you didn’t hear me?
Why ... why ... don’t you see the poor little thing’s bewitched?
whispered a bystander.
Very true ... very true ... let her be, therefore, let her stay where she
is.
Poor babe! she don’t hear a word you say.
O, but she dooze, though, said the boy, stooping down and
smoothing her thick hair with both hands; I know her of old, I know
her better than you do; she hears every word you say ... don’t you be
afeard, Bridgee Pope; I’m not a goin’ to be afeard of the Old Boy
himself....
Why Robert Eveleth! was the reply.
Well, Robert Eveleth, what have you to say? asked the chief-judge.
The boy stood up in reply, and threw back his head with a brave air,
and set his foot, and fixed his eye on the judge, and related what he
knew of the knife. He had broken it a few days before, he said, while
he and the witness were playing together; he threw away a part of
the blade, which he saw her pick up, and when he asked her what
she wanted of it, she wouldn’t say ... but he knew her well, and being
jest outside o’ the door when he heard her screech, and saw her pull
a piece of the broken blade out of her flesh and hold it up to the jury,
and say how the shape of old mother Good, who was over tother
side o’ the house at the time, had stabbed her with it, he guessed
how the judge would like to see the tother part o’ the knife, and hear
what he had to say for himself, but he couldn’t get near enough to
speak to nobody, and so he thought he’d run off to the school-house,
where he had left the handle o’ the knife, an’ try to get a mouthful o’
fresh air; and so ... and so ... arter he’d got the handle, sure enough,
who should he see but that are man there (pointing to Burroughs)
stavin’ away on a great black horse with a club—that very club he
had now.—“Whereupon,” added the boy, “here’s tother part o’ the
knife, judge—I say ... you ... Mr. judge ... here’s tother part o’ the
knife ... an’ so he stopped me an’ axed me where the plague I was
runnin to; an’ so I up an’ tells him all I know about the knife, an’ so,
an’ so, an’ so, that air feller, what dooze he do, but he jounces me up
on that air plaguy crupper and fetches me back here full split, you
see, and rides over everything, and makes everybody get out o’ the
way, an’ will make me tell the story whether or no ... and as for the
knife now, if you put them are two pieces together, you’ll see how
they match.... O, you needn’t be makin’ mouths at me, Anne
Putnam! nor you nyther, Marey Lewis! you are no great shakes,
nyther on you, and I ain’t afeard o’ nyther on you, though the grown
people be; you wont make me out a witch in a hurry, I guess.
Boy ... boy ... how came you by that knife?
How came I by that knife? Ax Bridgy Pope; she knows the knife well
enough, too—I guess—don’t you, Bridgy?
I guess I do, Robert Eveleth, whispered the child, the tears running
down her cheeks, and every breath a sob.
You’ve seen it afore, may be?
That I have, Robert Eveleth; but I never expected to see ... to see ...
to see it again ... alive ... nor you neither.
And why not, pray? said one of the judges.
Why not, Mr. Major! why, ye see ’tis a bit of a keep-sake she gin me,
jest afore we started off on that are vyage arter the goold.
The voyage when they were all cast away, sir ... after they’d fished
up the gold, sir....
Ah, but the goold was safe then, Bridgy—
But I knew how ’twould be Sir, said the poor girl turning to the judge
with a convulsive sob, and pushing away the hair from her face and
trying to get up, I never expected to see Robert Eveleth again Sir—I
said so too—nor the knife either—I said so before they went away
——.
So she did Mr. Judge, that’s a fact; she told me so down by the
beach there, just by that big tree that grows over the top o’ the new
school-house there—You know the one I mean—that one what
hangs over the edge o’ the hill just as if ’twas a-goin’ to fall into the
water—she heard poor mother Good say as much when her Billy
would go to sea whether or no, at the full o’ the moon——.
Ah!
That she did, long afore we got the ship off.
Possible!
Ay, to be sure an’ why not?—She had a bit of a dream ye see—such
a dream too! such a beautiful dream you never heard—about the
lumps of goold, and the joes, and the jewels, and the women o’ the
sea, and about a—I say, Mr. Judge, what, if you ax her to tell it over
now—I dare say she would; wouldn’t you Bridgy? You know it all
now, don’t you Bridgy?
No, no Robert—no, no; it’s all gone out o’ my head now.
No matter for the dream, boy, said a judge who was comparing the
parts of the blade together—no matter for the dream—these are
undoubtedly—look here brother, look—look—most undoubtedly
parts of the same blade.
Of a truth?
Of a truth, say you?
Yea verily, of a truth; pass the knife there—pass the knife. Be of
good cheer woman of sorrow——.
Brother! brother!——.
Well brother, what’s to pay now?
Perhaps it may be well brother—perhaps I say, to have the judgment
of the whole court before we bid the prisoner be of good cheer.
How wonderful are thy ways, O Lord! whispered Elder Smith, as they
took the parts of the blade for him to look at.
Very true brother—very true—but who knows how the affair may turn
out after all?
Pooh—pooh!—if you talk in that way the affair is all up; for whatever
should happen, you would believe it a trick of the father of lies—I
dare say now—.
The knife speaks for itself, said a judge.
Very true brother—very true. But he who had power to strive with
Aaron the High Priest, and power to raise the dead before Saul, and
power to work prodigies of old, may not lack power to do this—and
more, much more than this—for the help of them that serve him in
our day, and for the overthrow of the righteous——.
Pooh, pooh Nathan, pooh, pooh—there’s no escape for any body
now; your devil-at-a-pinch were enough to hang the best of us.
Thirteen pence for you, said the little man at the desk.
Here a consultation was held by the judges and the elders which
continued for half the day—the incredible issue may be told in few
words. The boy, Robert Eveleth, was treated with favor; the witness
being a large girl was rebuked for the lie instead of being whipped;
the preacher Burroughs from that day forth was regarded with
unspeakable terror, and the poor old woman—she was put to death
in due course of law.
CHAPTER VII.
Meanwhile other charges grew up, and there was a dread
everywhere throughout the whole country, a deep fear in the hearts
and a heavy mysterious fear in the blood of men. The judges were in
array against the people, and the people against each other; and the
number of the afflicted increased every day and every hour, and they
were sent for from all parts of the Colony. Fasting and prayer
preceded their steps, and whithersoever they went, witches and
wizards were sure to be discovered. A native theologian, a very
pious and very learned writer of that day, was employed by the
authorities of New England to draw up a detailed account of what he
himself was an eye witness of; and he says of the unhappy creatures
who appeared to be bewitched, all of whom he knew, and most of
whom he saw every day of his life, that when the fit was on, they
were distorted and convulsed in every limb, that they were pinched
black and blue by invisible fingers, that pins were stuck into their
flesh by invisible hands, that they were scalded in their sleep as with
boiling water and blistered as with fire, that one of the afflicted was
beset by a spectre with a spindle that nobody else could see, till in
her agony she snatched it away from the shape, when it became
instantly visible to everybody in the room with a quick flash, that
another was haunted by a shape clothed in a white sheet which
none but the afflicted herself was able to see till she tore a piece of it
away, whereupon it grew visible to others about her, (it was of this
particular story that Sarah Good spoke just before she was turned
off) that they were pursued night and day by withered hands—little
outstretched groping hands with no bodies nor arms to them, that
cups of blue fire and white smoke of a grateful smell, were offered
them to drink while they were in bed, of which, if they tasted ever so
little, as they would sometimes in their fright and hurry, their bodies
would swell up and their flesh would grow livid, much as if they had
been bit by a rattle snake, that burning rags were forced into their
mouths or under their armpits, leaving sores that no medicine would
cure, that some were branded as with a hot iron, so that very deep
marks were left upon their foreheads for life, that the spectres
generally personated such as were known to the afflicted, and that
whenever they did so, if the shape or spectre was hurt by the
afflicted, the person represented by the shape was sure to be hurt in
the same way, that, for example, one of the afflicted having charged
a woman of Beverly, Dorcas Hoare, with tormenting her, and
immediately afterwards, pointing to a far part of the room, cried out,
there!—there! there she goes now! a man who stood near, drew his
rapier and struck at the wall, whereupon the accuser told the court
he had given the shape a scratch over the right eye; and that Dorcas
Hoare being apprehended a few days thereafter, it was found that
she had a mark over the right eye, which after a while she confessed
had been given her by the rapier; that if the accused threw a look at
the witnesses, the latter, though their eyes were turned another way,
would know it, and fall into a trance, out of which they would recover
only at the touch of the accused, that oftentimes the flesh of the
afflicted was bitten with a peculiar set of teeth corresponding
precisely with the teeth of the accused, whether few or many, large
or small, broken or regular, and that after a while, the afflicted were
often able to see the shapes that tormented them, and among the
rest a swarthy devil of a diminutive stature, with fierce bright eyes,
who carried a book in which he kept urging them to write, whereby
they would have submitted themselves to the power and authority of
another Black Shape, with which, if they were to be believed on their
oaths, two or three of their number had slept.
In reply to these reputed facts however, which appear in the grave
elaborate chronicles of the church, and are fortified by other facts
which were testified to about the same time, in the mother country,
we have the word of George Burroughs, a minister of God, who met
the accusers at the time, and stood up to them face to face, and
denied the truth of their charges, and braved the whole power of
them that others were so afraid of.
Man! man! away with her to the place of death! cried he to the chief
judge, on hearing a beautiful woman with a babe at her breast, a
wife and a mother acknowledge that she had lain with Beelzebub.
Away with her! why do you let her live! why permit her to profane the
House of the Lord, where the righteous are now gathered together,
as ye believe? why do ye spare the few that confess—would ye
bribe them to live? Would ye teach them to swear away the lives and
characters of all whom they are afraid of? and thus to preserve their
own? Look there!—that is her child—her only child—the babe that
you see there in the lap of that aged woman—she has no other hope
in this world, nothing to love, nothing to care for but that babe, the
man-child of her beauty. Ye are fathers!—look at her streaming eyes,
at her locked hands, at her pale quivering mouth, at her dishevelled
hair—can you wonder now at anything she says to save her boy—for
if she dies, he dies? A wife and a mother! a broken-hearted wife and
a young mother accused of what, if she did not speak as you have
now made her speak, would separate her and her baby forever and
ever!
Would you have us put her to death? asked one of the judges. You
appear to argue in a strange way. What is your motive?—What your
hope?—What would you have us do? suffer them to escape who will
not confess, and put all to death who do?
Even so.
Why—if you were in league with the Evil One yourself brother
George, I do not well see how you could hit upon a method more
advantageous for him.
Hear me—I would rather die myself, unfitted as I am for death, die by
the rope, while striving to stay the mischief-makers in their headlong
career, than be the cause of death to such a woman as that,
pleading before you though she be, with perjury; because of a truth
she is pleading, not so much against life as for life, not so much
against the poor old creature whom she accuses of leading her
astray, as for the babe that you see there; for that boy and for its
mother who is quite sure that if she die, the boy will die—I say that
which is true, fathers! and yet I swear to you by the—
Thirteen-pence to you, brother B. for that!
—By the God of Abraham, that if her life—
Thirteen-pence more—faith!
The same to you—said the outlandishman. Sharp work, hey?
Fool—fool—if it depended upon me I say, her life and that of her boy,
I would order them both to the scaffold! Ye are amazed at what you
hear; ye look at each other in dismay; ye wonder how it is that a
mortal man hath courage to speak as I speak. And yet—hear me!
Fathers of New-England, hear me! beautiful as the boy is, and
beautiful as the mother is, I would put the mark of death upon her
forehead, even though his death were certain to follow, because if I
did so, I should be sure that a stop would be put forever to such
horrible stories.
I thought so, said major Gidney—I thought so, by my troth, leaning
over the seat and speaking in a whisper to judge Saltanstall, who
shook his head with a mysterious air, and said—nothing.
Ye would save by her death, O, ye know not how much of human
life!
Brother Burroughs!
Brother Willard!—what is there to shock you in what I say? These
poor people who are driven by you to perjury, made to confess by
your absurd law, will they stop with confession? Their lives are at
stake—will they not be driven to accuse? Will they not endeavor to
make all sure?—to fortify their stories by charging the innocent, or
those of whom they are afraid? Will they stop where you would have
them stop? Will they not rather come to believe that which they hear,
and that of which they are afraid?—to believe each other, even while
they know that what they themselves do swear is untrue?—May they
not strive to anticipate each other, to show their zeal or the sincerity
of their faith?—And may they not, by and by—I pray you to consider
this—may they not hereafter charge the living and the mighty as they
have hitherto charged the dead, and the poor, and the weak?
Well—
Well!
Yes—well!—what more have you to say?
What more! why, if need be, much more! You drive people to
confession, I say—you drive them to it, step by step, as with a
scourge of iron. Their lives are at stake, I will say—yet more—I mean
to say much more now; now that you will provoke me to it. I say now
that you—you—ye judges of the land!—you are the cause of all that
we suffer! The accused are obliged to accuse. They have no other
hope. They lie—and you know it, or should know it—and you know,
as well as I do, that they have no other hope, no other chance of
escape. All that have hitherto confessed are alive now. All that have
denied your charges, all that have withstood your mighty temptation
—they are all in the grave—all—all—
Brother—we have read in the Scriptures of Truth, or at least I have,
that of old, a woman had power to raise the dead. If she was upon
her trial now, would you not receive her confession? I wait your reply.
Receive it, governor Phips! no—no—not without proof that she had
such power.
Proof—how?
How! Ye should command her to raise the dead for proof—to raise
the dead in your presence. You are consulting together; I see that
you pity me. Nevertheless, I say again, that if these people are what
they say they are, they should be made to prove it by such awful and
irresistible proof—ah!—what are ye afraid of, judges?
We are not afraid.
Ye are afraid—ye are—and of that wretched old woman there!
What if we call for the proof now—will you endure it?
Endure it! Yes—whatever it may be. Speak to her. Bid her do her
worst—I have no fear—you are quaking with fear. I defy the Power of
Darkness; you would appear to tremble before it. And here I set my
foot—and here I call for the proof! Are they indeed witches?—what
can be easier than to overthrow such an adversary as I am? Why do
ye look at me as if I were mad—you are prepared to see me drop
down perhaps, or to cry out, or to give up the ghost? Why do ye
shake your heads at me? What have I to fear? And why is it I
beseech you, that you are not moved by the evil-eye of that poor
woman? Why is it, I pray you, fathers and judges, that they alone
who bear witness against her are troubled by her look?
Brother Sewall, said one of the judges who had been brought up to
the law; Master Burroughs, I take it, is not of counsel for the prisoner
at the bar?
Assuredly not, brother.
Nor is he himself under the charge?
The remark is proper, said Burroughs. I am aware of all you would
say. I have no right perhaps to open my mouth—
No right, perhaps?—no right brother B., said Winthrop—no right, we
believe?—but—if the prosecutors will suffer it?—why, why—we have
no objection, I suppose—I am sure—have we brother G.?
None at all. What say you Mr. Attorney-general?
Say Sir! What do I say Sir! why Sir, I say Sir, that such a thing was
never heard of before! and I say Sir, that it is against all rule Sir! If
the accused require counsel, the court have power to assign her
suitable counsel—such counsel to be of the law, Sir!—and being of
the law Sir, he would have no right Sir, you understand Sir,—no right
Sir—to address the jury, Sir—as you did the other day Sir—in Rex
versus Good, Sir,—none at all Sir!
Indeed—what may such counsel do then?
Do Sir! do!—why Sir, he may cross-examine the witnesses.
Really!
To be sure he may Sir! and what is more, he may argue points of law
to the court if need be.
Indeed!
Yes—but only points of law.
The court have power to grant such leave, hey?
Yes, that we have, said a judge. You may speak us a speech now, if
you will; but I would have you confine yourself to the charge.—
Here the prosecutor stood up, and saying he had made out his case,
prayed the direction of the court—
No, no, excuse me, said Burroughs; no, no, you have taught me how
to proceed Sir, and I shall undertake for the wretched woman,
whatever may be thought or said by the man of the law.
Proceed Mr. Burroughs—you are at liberty to proceed.
Well Martha, said Burroughs—I am to be your counsel now. What
have you to say for yourself?
The lawyers interchanged a sneer with each other.
Me—nothin’ at all, Sir.
Have you nobody here to speak for you?
For me!—Lord bless you, no! Nobody cares for poor Martha.
No witnesses?
Witnesses!—no indeed, but if you want witnesses, there’s a power of
witnesses.
Where?—
There—there by the box there—
Poor Martha! You do not understand me; the witnesses you see
there belong to the other side.
Well, what if they do?
Have you no witnesses of your own, pray?
Of my own! Lord you—there now—don’t be cross with me. How
should poor Martha know—they never told me;—what are they good
for?
But is there nobody here acquainted with you?
And if there was, what would that prove? said a man of the law.
My stars, no! them that know’d me know’d enough to keep away,
when they lugged me off to jail.
And so there’s nobody here to say a kind word for you, if your life
depended on it?
No Sir—nobody at all—nobody cares for Martha. Gracious God—
what unspeakable simplicity!
O, I forgot Sir, I forgot! cried Martha, leaning over the bar and
clapping her hands with a cry of childish joy. I did see neighbor Joe
Trip, t’other day, and I told him he ought to stick by me—
Well where is he—what did he say?
Why he said he’d rather not, if ’twas all the same to me.
He’d rather not—where does he live?
And I spoke to three more, said a bystander, but they wouldn’t come
so fur, some was afeared, and some wouldn’t take the trouble.
Ah! is that you, Jeremiah?—how d’ye do, how d’ye do?—all well I
hope at your house?—an’ so they wouldn’t come, would they?—I
wish they would though, for I’m tired o’ stayin’ here; I’d do as much
for them—
Hear you that judges! They would not come to testify in a matter of
life and death. What are their names?—where do they live?—they
shall be made to come.
You’ll excuse me, said the prosecutor. You are the day after the fair;
it’s too late now.
Too late! I appeal to the judges—too late!—would you persuade me
Sir, that it is ever too late for mercy, while there is yet room for
mercy? I speak to the judges—I pray them to make use of their
power, and to have these people who keep away at such a time
brought hither by force.
The court have no such power, said the Attorney-General.
How Sir! have they not power to compel a witness to attend?
To be sure they have—on the part of the crown.
On the part of the crown!
Yes.
And not on the part of a prisoner?
No.
No! can this be the law?
Even so, said a judge.
Well, well—poor Martha!
What’s the matter now?—what ails you, Mr. Burroughs?
Martha—
Sir!
There’s no hope Martha.
Hope?
No Martha, no; there’s no hope for you. They will have you die.
Die!—me!—
Yes, poor Martha—you.
Me!—what for?—what have I done?
O that your accusers were not rock, Martha!
Rock!
O that your judges could feel! or any that anybody who knows you
would appear and speak to your piety and your simplicity!
Law Sir—how you talk!
Why as for that now, said Jeremiah Smith, who stood by her, wiping
his eyes and breathing very hard; here am I, Sir, an’ ready to say a
good word for the poor soul, if I die for it; fact is, you see, Mr. Judge
Sewall I’ve know’d poor Martha Cory—hai’nt I Martha?—
So you have Jerry Smith.
—Ever since our Jeptha warn’t more’n so high,—
Stop Sir, if you please, you are not sworn yet, said one of the judges.