Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Readingpracticetest1 v4 561
Readingpracticetest1 v4 561
READING PASSAGE 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
The 16th and 17th centuries saw two great pioneers of modern science: Galileo and Gilbert. The impact of their findings is eminent.
Gilbert was the first modern scientist, also the accredited father of the science of electricity and magnetism, an Englishman of learning
and a physician at the court of Elizabeth. Prior to him, all that was known of electricity and magnetism was what the ancients knew,
nothing more than that the lodestone possessed magnetic properties and that amber and jet, when rubbed, would attract bits of paper or
other substances of small specific gravity. However, he is less well known than he deserves.
Gilbert’s birth pre-dated Galileo. Born in an eminent local family in Colchester County in the UK, on May 24, 1544, he went to grammar
school, and then studied medicine at St John’s College, Cambridge, graduating in 1573. Later he travelled in the continent and eventually
settled down in London.
He was a very successful and eminent doctor. All this culminated in his election to the president of the Royal Science Society. He was
also appointed personal physician to the Queen (Elizabeth I), and later knighted by the Queen. He faithfully served her until her death.
However, he didn’t outlive the Queen for long and died on November 30, 1603, only a few months after his appointment as personal
physician to King James.
Gilbert was first interested in chemistry but later changed his focus due to the large portion of mysticism of alchemy involved (such as the
transmutation of metal). He gradually developed his interest in physics after the great minds of the ancient, particularly about the
knowledge the ancient Greeks had about lodestones, strange minerals with the power to attract iron. In the meantime, Britain became a
major seafaring nation in 1588 when the Spanish Armada was defeated, opening the way to British settlement of America. British ships
depended on the magnetic compass, yet no one understood why it worked. Did the Pole Star attract it, as Columbus once speculated; or
was there a magnetic mountain at the pole, as described in Odyssey, which ships would never approach, because the sailors thought its
Access http://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 3
pull would yank out all their iron nails and fittings? For nearly 20 years, William Gilbert conducted ingenious experiments to understand
magnetism. His works include On the Magnet, Magnetic Bodies, and the Great Magnet of the Earth.
Gilbert’s discovery was so important to modern physics. He investigated the nature of magnetism and electricity. He even coined the
word “electric”. Though the early beliefs of magnetism were also largely entangled with superstitions such as that rubbing garlic on
lodestone can neutralise its magnetism, one example being that sailors even believed the smell of garlic would even interfere with the
action of compass, which is why helmsmen were forbidden to eat it near a ship’s compass. Gilbert also found that metals can be
magnetised by rubbing materials such as fur, plastic or the like on them. He named the ends of a magnet “north pole” and “south pole”.
The magnetic poles can attract or repel, depending on polarity. In addition, however, ordinary iron is always attracted to a magnet.
Though he started to study the relationship between magnetism and electricity, sadly he didn’t complete it. His research of static
electricity using amber and jet only demonstrated that objects with electrical charges can work like magnets attracting small pieces of
paper and stuff. It is a French guy named du Fay that discovered that there are actually two electrical charges, positive and negative.
He also questioned the traditional astronomical beliefs. Though a Copernican, he didn’t express in his quintessential beliefs whether the
earth is at the centre of the universe or in orbit around the sun. However, he believed that stars are not equidistant from the earth but
have their own earth-like planets orbiting around them. The earth itself is like a giant magnet, which is also why compasses always point
north. They spin on an axis that is aligned with the earth’s polarity. He even likened the polarity of the magnet to the polarity of the earth
and built an entire magnetic philosophy on this analogy. In his explanation, magnetism is the soul of the earth. Thus a perfectly spherical
lodestone, when aligned with the earth’s poles, would wobble all by itself in 24 hours. Further, he also believed that the sun and other
stars wobble just like the earth does around a crystal core, and speculated that the moon might also be a magnet caused to orbit by its
magnetic attraction to the earth. This was perhaps the first proposal that a force might cause a heavenly orbit.
His research method was revolutionary in that he used experiments rather than pure logic and reasoning like the ancient Greek
philosophers did. It was a new attitude towards scientific investigation. Until then, scientific experiments were not in fashion. It was
Access http://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 4
because of this scientific attitude, together with his contribution to our knowledge of magnetism, that a unit of magneto motive force, also
known as magnetic potential, was named Gilbert in his honour. His approach of careful observation and experimentation rather than the
authoritative opinion or deductive philosophy of others had laid the very foundation for modern science.
READING PASSAGE 2
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on Reading Passage 2 below.
The three months of June, July and August were the warmest ever recorded in western and central Europe, with record national highs in
Portugal, Germany and Switzerland as well as in Britain. And they were the warmest by a very long way. Over a great rectangular block
of the earth stretching from west of Paris to northern Italy, taking in Switzerland and southern Germany, the average temperature for the
summer months was 3.78°C above the long-term norm, said the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia in
Norwich, which is one of the world's leading institutions for the monitoring and analysis of temperature records.
Meteorologists have hitherto contented themselves with the formula that recent high temperatures are “consistent with predictions” of
climate change. For the great block of the map - that stretching between 35-50N and 0-20E - the CRU has reliable temperature records
dating back to 1781. Using as a baseline the average summer temperature recorded between 1961 and 1990, departures from the
temperature norm, or “anomalies”, over the area as a whole can easily be plotted. As the graph shows, such is the variability of our
climate that over the past 200 years, there have been at least half a dozen anomalies, in terms of excess temperature - the peaks on the
graph denoting very hot years - approaching, or even exceeding, 2°C. But there has been nothing remotely like 2003, when the anomaly
is nearly four degrees.
“This is quite remarkable,’ Professor Jones told The Independent. “It’s very unusual in a statistical sense. If this series had a normal
statistical distribution, you wouldn’t get this number. The return period [how often it could be expected to recur] would be something like
one in a thousand years. If we look at an excess above the average of nearly four degrees, then perhaps nearly three degrees of that is
natural variability, because we’ve seen that in past summers. But the final degree of it is likely to be due to global warming, caused by
human actions.”
The summer of 2003 has, in a sense, been one that climate scientists have long been expecting. Until now, the warming has been
manifesting itself mainly in winters that have been less cold than in summers that have been much hotter. Last week, the United Nations
predicted that winters were warming so quickly that winter sports would die out in Europe’s lower-level ski resorts. But sooner or later, the
unprecedented hot summer was bound to come, and this year it did.
One of the most dramatic features of the summer was the hot nights, especially in the first half of August. In Paris, the temperature never
The 15,000 excess deaths in France during August, compared with previous years, have been related to the high night-time
temperatures. The number gradually increased during the first 12 days of the month, peaking at about 2,000 per day on the night of 12-
13 August, then fell off dramatically after 14 August when the minimum temperatures fell by about 5°C. The elderly were most affected,
with a 70 per cent increase in mortality rate in those aged 75-94.
For Britain, the year as a whole is likely to be the warmest ever recorded, but despite the high temperature record on 10 August, the
summer itself - defined as the June, July and August period - still comes behind 1976 and 1995, when there were longer periods of
intense heat. “At the moment, the year is on course to be the third hottest ever in the global temperature record, which goes back to
1856, behind 1998 and 2002, but when all the records for October, November and December are collated, it might move into second
place/' Professor Jones said. The ten hottest years in the record have all now occurred since 1990. Professor Jones is in no doubt about
the astonishing nature of European summer of 2003. “The temperatures recorded were out of all proportion to the previous record," he
said.
“It was the warmest summer in the past 500 years and probably way beyond that. It was enormously exceptional."
His colleagues at the University of East Anglia's Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research are now planning a special study of it. “It
was a summer that has not been experienced before, either in terms of the temperature extremes that were reached, or the range and
diversity of the impacts of the extreme heat," said the centre's executive director, Professor Mike Hulme.
“It will certainly have left its mark on a number of countries, as to how they think and plan for climate change in the future, much as the
2000 floods have revolutionised the way the Government is thinking about flooding in the UK. The 2003 heatwave will have similar
repercussions across Europe."
A Tim Sparks slides a small leather-bound notebook out of an envelope. The book's yellowing pages contain bee-keeping notes made
between 1941 and 1969 by the late Walter Coates of Kilworth, Leicestershire. He adds it to his growing pile of local journals,
birdwatchers' lists and gardening diaries. "We're uncovering about one major new record each month," he says, "I still get surprised."
Around two centuries before Coates, Robert Marsham, a landowner from Norfolk in the east of England, began recording the life cycles
of plants and animals on his estate - when the first wood anemones flowered, the dates on which the oaks burst into leaf and the rooks
began nesting. Successive Marshams continued compiling these notes for 211 years.
B Today, such records are being put to uses that their authors could not possibly have expected. These data sets, and others like them,
are proving invaluable to ecologists interested in the timing of biological events, or phenology. By combining the records with climate
data, researchers can reveal how, for example, changes in temperature affect the arrival of spring, allowing ecologists to make improved
predictions about the impact of climate change. A small band of researchers is combing through hundreds of years of records taken by
thousands of amateur naturalists. And more systematic projects have also started up, producing an overwhelming response. "The
amount of interest is almost frightening," says Sparks, a climate researcher at the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in Monks Wood,
Cambridgeshire.
C Sparks first became aware of the army of "closet phenologists”, as he describes them, when a retiring colleague gave him the
Marsham records. He now spends much of his time following leads from one historical data set to another. As news of his quest
spreads, people tip him off to other historical records, and more amateur phenologists come out of their closets. The British devotion to
recording and collecting makes his job easier - one man from Kent sent him 30 years' worth of kitchen calendars, on which he had noted
the date that his neighbour's magnolia tree flowered.
D Other researchers have unearthed data from equally odd sources. Rafe Sagarin, an ecologist at Stanford University in California,
recently studied records of a betting contest in which participants attempt to guess the exact time at which a specially erected wooden
tripod will fall through the surface of a thawing river. The competition has taken place annually on the Tenana River in Alaska since 1917,
Access http://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 10
and analysis of the results showed that the thaw now arrives five days earlier than it did when the contest began.
E Overall, such records have helped to show that, compared with 20 years ago, a raft of natural events now occur earlier across much of
the northern hemisphere, from the opening of leaves to the return of birds from migration and the emergence of butterflies from
hibernation. The data can also hint at how nature will change in the future. Together with models of climate change, amateurs' records
could help guide conservation. Terry Root, an ecologist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, has collected birdwatchers' counts of
wildfowl taken between 1955 and 1996 on seasonal ponds in the American Midwest and combined them with climate data and models of
future warming. Her analysis shows that the increased droughts that the models predict could halve the breeding populations at the
ponds. "The number of waterfowl in North America will most probably drop significantly with global warming," she says.
F But not all professionals are happy to use amateur data. "A lot of scientists won't touch them, they say they're too full of problems,"
says Root. Because different observers can have different ideas of what constitutes, for example, an open snowdrop. "The biggest
concern with ad hoc observations is how carefully and systematically they were taken," says Mark Schwartz of the University of
Wisconsin, Milwaukee, who studies the interactions between plants and climate. "We need to know pretty precisely what a person's been
observing - if they just say 'I noted when the leaves came out', it might not be that useful." Measuring the onset of autumn can be
particularly problematic because deciding when leaves change colour is a more subjective process than noting when they appear.
G Overall, most phenologists are positive about the contribution that amateurs can make. "They get at the raw power of science: careful
observation of the natural world," says Sagarin. But the professionals also acknowledge the need for careful quality control. Root, for
example, tries to gauge the quality of an amateur archive by interviewing its collector. "You always have to worry - things as trivial as
vacations can affect measurement. I disregard a lot of records because they're not rigorous enough," she says. Others suggest that the
right statistics can iron out some of the problems with amateur data. Together with colleagues at Wageningen University in the
Netherlands, environmental scientist Arnold van Vliet is developing statistical techniques to account for the uncertainty in amateur
phenological data. With the enthusiasm of amateur phenologists evident from past records, professional researchers are now trying to
create standardised recording schemes for future efforts. They hope that well-designed studies will generate a volume of observations
large enough to drown out the idiosyncrasies of individual recorders. The data are cheap to collect, and can provide breadth in space,
time and range of species. "It's very difficult to collect data on a large geographical scale without enlisting an army of observers," says
Root.
Choose the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below.
Write the correct number i-x in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.
List of headings
1 Paragraph A
2 Paragraph B
4 Paragraph D
5 Paragraph E
6 Paragraph F
7 Paragraph G
Questions 8-10
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage
1?
Questions 11-13
Access http://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 14
Choose THREE letters A-F.
Write your answers in boxes 11-13 on your answer sheet.
Which THREE of the following are parts of Gilbert’s discovery?
Questions 14-19
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?
In boxes 14-19 on your answer sheet write
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Questions 20-21
Answer the questions below using NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the
passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 20-21 on your answer sheet.
What are the other two hottest years in Britain besides 2003?
20
What will also influence government policies in the future like the hot summer in
2003?
21
Questions 22-25
Complete the summary below using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the
passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 22-25 on your answer sheet.
Question 26
Choose the correct letter A, B, C or D.
Write your answer in box 26 on your answer sheet.
Which one of the following can be best used as the title of this
passage?
26
A Global Warming
Answer: D
Questions 27-33
Reading Passage 3 has eight paragraphs A-H.
Write the correct letter A-H in boxes 27-33 on your answer sheet.
Questions 34-36
Complete the sentences below with NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the
passage for each answer.
Answer: C
Mark Schwartz used the example of leaves to illustrate
38 that
Answer: A
How do the scientists suggest amateur data should be
39 used?
A
Access Using improved methodsfor more practices
http://ieltsonlinetests.com page 19
A Using improved methods
B Being more careful in observation
Answer: D
What’s the implication of phenology for ordinary
40 people?
Answer: D
1 v 2 i
3 vi 4 x
5 ix 6 iv
7 ii 8 TRUE
9 TRUE 10 NOT GIVEN
11
13
C,D,E 14 YES
15 YES 16 NO
17 NOT GIVEN 18 YES
19 NOT GIVEN 20 1976, 1995
21 2000 floods/flooding 22 1998 and 2002/1998, 2002
23 1990 24 1856
25 France 26 D
27 B 28 C
29 H 30 G
31 E 32 D
33 A 34 bee-keeping
35 life cycles 36 drought(s)
37 C 38 A
39 D 40 D