The Genesis of The Self: Mediastudies - Press - Social Media & The Self: An Open Reader

mediastudies.
press • Social Media & the Self: An Open Reader
The Genesis of the Self

George Herbert Mead
Published on: Apr 01, 1925

Updated on: Aug 11, 2020
License: Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication (CC-0 4.0)
mediastudies.press • Social Media & the Self: An Open Reader The Genesis of the Self
THE SELF THAT is central to all so-called mental experience has appeared only in the social conduct of
human vertebrates. It is just because the individual finds himself taking the attitudes of the others
who are involved in his conduct that he becomes an object for himself. It is only by taking the rôles of
others that we have been able to come back to ourselves. […]
It is interesting to note that in the development of the individual child, there are two stages which
present the two essential steps in attaining self-consciousness. The first stage is that of play, and the
second that of the game, where these two are distinguished from each other. In play in this sense, the
child is continually acting as a parent, a teacher, a preacher, a grocery man, a policeman, a pirate, or an
Indian. It is the period of childish existence which Wordsworth has described as that of “endless
imitation.” It is the period of Froebel’s kindergarten plays. In it, as Froebel recognized, the child is
acquiring the rôles of those who belong to his society. This takes place because the child is continually
exciting in himself the responses to his own social acts. In his infant dependence upon the responses
of others to his own social stimuli, he is peculiarly sensitive to this relation. Having in his own nature
the beginning of the parental response, he calls it out by his own appeals. The doll is the universal type
of this, but before he plays with a doll, he responds in tone of voice and in attitude as his parents
respond to his own cries and chortles. [...] That is, one calls or tends to call out in himself the same
response that he calls out in the other.
The play antedates the game. For in a game there is a regulated procedure, and rules. The child must
not only take the rôle of the other, as he does in the play, but he must assume the various rôles of all
the participants in the game, and govern his action accordingly. If he plays first base, it is as the one to
whom the ball will be thrown from the field or from the catcher. Their organized reactions to him he
has imbedded in his own playing of the different positions, and this organized reaction becomes what I
have called the “generalized other” that accompanies and controls his conduct. And it is this
generalized other in his experience which provides him with a self.
We are in possession of selves just in so far as we can and do take the attitudes of others toward
ourselves and respond to those attitudes. We approve of ourselves and condemn ourselves. We pat
ourselves upon the back and in blind fury attack ourselves. We assume the generalized attitude of the
group, in the censor that stands at the door of our imagery and inner conversations, and in the
affirmation of the laws and axioms of the universe of discourse. Quod semper, quod ubique. Our
thinking is an inner conversation in which we may be taking the roles of specific acquaintances over
against ourselves, but usually it is with what I have termed the “generalized other” that we converse,
and so attain to the levels of abstract thinking, and that impersonality, that so-called objectivity that
we cherish.
2
mediastudies.press • Social Media & the Self: An Open Reader The Genesis of the Self
One assumes, as I have said, the attitudes of generalized others. But even with this advantage of the
universal over the multiplicity of its numberless instances, the number of different responses that
enter into our social conduct seems to defy any capacity of any individual to assume the rôles which
would be essential to define our social objects. And yet, though modern life has become indefinitely
more complex than it was in earlier periods of human history, it is far easier for the modern man than
for his predecessor to put himself in the place of those who contribute to his necessities, who share
with him the functions of government, or join with him in determining prices. It is not the number of
participants, or even the number of different functions, that is of primary importance. The important
question is whether these various forms of activities belong so naturally to the member of a human
society that, in taking the role of another, his activities are found to belong to one’s own nature. As long
as the complexities of human society do not exceed those of the central nervous system, the problem
of an adequate social object, which is identical with that of an adequate self-consciousness, is not that
of becoming acquainted with the indefinite number of acts that are involved in social behavior, but
that of so overcoming the distances in space and time, and the barriers of language and convention and
social status, that we can converse with ourselves in the rôles of those who are involved with us in the
common undertaking of life. A journalism that is insatiably curious about the human attitudes of all of
us is the sign of the times. The other curiosities as to the conditions under which other people live, and
work, and fight each other, and love each other, follow from the fundamental curiosity which is the
passion of self-consciousness. We must be others if we are to be ourselves.
EXCERPT
“The Genesis of the Self and Social Control” (George Herbert Mead, International Journal of Ethics 35,
no. 3 (1925): 268, 269, 272, 275–76)
PUBLIC DOMAIN

The Genesis of The Self: Mediastudies - Press - Social Media & The Self: An Open Reader

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Genesis of The Self: Mediastudies - Press - Social Media & The Self: An Open Reader

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

mediastudies.

press • Social Media & the Self: An Open Reader

The Genesis of the Self

Published on: Apr 01, 1925

You might also like