Assignment on

1. How we can study politics?

2. Political parties in Bangladesh: History and present status.

3. Capitalism.

Submitted To:

Mubasshira Chowdhury Nabila

Lecturer

Dept of Development studies

University of Chittagong

Submitted By:

Wapeka Helali Niha

ID:22408015

Session:21-22

Dept of Development studies

University of Chittagong

Date of submission: May 5, 2024

Assignment Title 1: How we can study politics?

Politics is the process by which members of a community come to organized

decisions. Making agreements between individuals to enable them to coexist in
communities, such as tribes, towns, or nations, is the essence of politics. Some
individuals may devote a significant amount of their time to forming such
agreements in huge groupings, like nations. Studying politics includes examining
issues of power, government, laws, and social relations. The purpose of this task is
to familiarize the various facets of political studies, ranging from conceptual
frameworks to real-world applications.

Politics can be defined as the process by which individuals and groups make
decisions and allocate resources within a society. It involves the exercise of power,
negotiation of interests, and the distribution of authority. Politics encompasses a
wide range of activities, including governance, policymaking, elections, lobbying,
and public administration. At its core, politics is concerned with the distribution and
exercise of power to address collective problems and shape societal outcomes.
Political studies is an academic subject that systematically analyzes political
phenomena. It is often referred to as political science or political studies. It aims to
comprehend political conduct, the essence of politics, and the operation of political
institutions at different scales, ranging from regional administrations to global
institutions. In order to investigate issues with power, governance, ideology, public
policy, international relations, and the role of citizens in political processes, political
studies makes use of a variety of theoretical frameworks and methodology. The
origins and evolution of political thought trace back to ancient civilizations and
philosophers who pondered the nature of governance, justice, and the role of the
state. In ancient Greece, Plato emphasized the pursuit of justice and the ideal city-
state in works like "The Republic," envisioning a philosopher-king ruling with wisdom.
Aristotle, in "Politics," explored different forms of government and the concept of the
"polis" (city-state) as the foundation of political life. Moving forward to the
Renaissance, Machiavelli's "The Prince" revolutionized political theory by advocating
for pragmatism over idealism, emphasizing power and the art of statecraft. Jean-
Jacques Rousseau, during the Enlightenment, challenged traditional views of
authority and social contract theory in works such as "The Social Contract,"
emphasizing the sovereignty of the people. These thinkers laid the groundwork for
diverse political ideologies and continue to influence modern political thought.

Political philosophy provides theoretical frameworks and ethical principles for comp
rehending and assessing political systems, which plays a significant role in creating
government and societal structures.
It tackles important issues pertaining to rights, justice, authority, and the function of
government in society.
Political philosophy examines these ideas in order to provide guidance for the creati
on and operation of governing structures, so affecting laws, institutions, and policies
.
In addition, political philosophers question established conventions and ideologies,
encouraging critical thinking and advancing political philosophy.

Major theoretical approaches in political studies offer distinct perspectives on

power, governance, and society. Realism emphasizes state-centric power dynamics
and security concerns in international relations, prioritizing national interests and
stability. Liberalism focuses on individual rights, democracy, and market-based
economics, advocating for limited government intervention. Marxism critiques
capitalism, highlighting class struggle and economic determinism, advocating for
collective ownership of means of production. Feminism examines gender
inequalities, challenging patriarchal structures and advocating for gender equality in
politics and society. Post-colonialism critiques colonial legacies, exploring power
imbalance and cultural hegemony, emphasizing decolonization and marginalized
voices in political discourse. These theoretical lenses provide critical insights into
diverse aspects of political life and inform policy debates and social movements.
Realism emphasizes the primacy of state interests and the pursuit of power in
international relations. It views the international system as anarchic and
characterized by competition among states for security and survival. Realists argue
that states prioritize self-preservation and national interests over moral
considerations, leading to strategies such as balance of power and deterrence.
Realism's focus on power dynamics underscores the importance of military
capabilities and strategic alliances in shaping global politics. Liberalism emphasizes
individual rights, democratic governance, and economic freedom. It views
international cooperation, diplomacy, and institutions as essential for maintaining
peace and advancing shared interests. Liberals advocate for free trade,
multilateralism, and human rights as means to promote stability and prosperity. In
societal dynamics, liberalism emphasizes the rule of law, civil liberties, and
pluralistic democracy, aiming to balance individual freedoms with collective welfare
through policy interventions and social programs. Marxism analyzes power relations
through the lens of class struggle and economic determinism. It critiques capitalism
for perpetuating inequality and exploitation, with the bourgeoisie controlling the
means of production and exploiting the proletariat. Marxism views history as a
series of class conflicts and predicts the eventual overthrow of capitalism by the
working class (proletariat) leading to a classless society (communism). In
international relations, Marxism highlights economic imperialism, neocolonialism,
and the role of multinational corporations in shaping global power structures.
Feminism examines power dynamics based on gender inequalities and patriarchal
structures. It critiques traditional political theories for marginalizing women's
experiences and advocates for gender equity in politics, economics, and social
institutions. Feminist perspectives analyze how power operates through gender
norms, discrimination, and violence, influencing domestic and international
policies. Feminism also challenges militarism and explores alternative approaches
to security and conflict resolution based on principles of care, empathy, and
inclusivity. Post-colonialism explores power dynamics in the context of colonial
legacies and cultural hegemony. It critiques Western-centric narratives and exposes
the impact of colonialism on identity, knowledge production, and global
inequalities. Post-colonial perspectives emphasize decolonization, cultural
diversity, and the agency of formerly colonized peoples in reshaping societal norms
and institutions. In international relations, post-colonialism highlights the
persistence of neocolonial structures and calls for solidarity among marginalized
communities to challenge dominant power structures.

These theoretical stances support radical change in political theory and practice
while presenting a variety of viewpoints and providing important insights into the
complexity of power, governance, and society dynamics.

Different forms of governance span a spectrum from democracy, characterized by

popular participation, rule of law, and protection of rights, to authoritarianism,
where power is concentrated in the hands of a single leader or elite group.
Democracies prioritize civil liberties, accountability, and periodic elections to
ensure government responsiveness to citizens. In contrast, authoritarian regimes
restrict political freedoms, suppress dissent, and concentrate power in centralized
institutions or individuals. Variants like hybrid regimes combine democratic
elements with authoritarian controls. The type of governance profoundly impacts
political stability, human rights, and economic development within societies. In
political systems, institutions such as the state, legislature, executive, and judiciary
play essential roles in governance. The state provides the framework for collective
decision-making and upholding sovereignty, encompassing the population, territory,
and government. The legislature (e.g., parliament or congress) enacts laws and
represents citizens' interests, balancing power with the executive. The executive
(e.g., president or prime minister) implements policies and manages state affairs,
accountable to the legislature and electorate. The judiciary interprets laws, resolves
disputes, and upholds constitutional principles, serving as a check on executive and
legislative actions. Together, these institutions define the distribution of power and
shape the functioning of political systems. Parliamentary systems feature a fusion of
executive and legislative branches, with the government formed by the majority
party or coalition in parliament. The head of government is typically the prime
minister. In presidential systems, the executive branch is separate from the
legislature, and the president is elected independently and holds significant powers.

Comparative politics is vital for understanding global governance by providing

insights into diverse political systems, institutions, and policy outcomes across
countries. Through comparative analysis, researchers identify patterns, variations,
and factors influencing governance effectiveness, democratization, and policy
success. This approach helps policymakers and scholars evaluate best practices,
learn from different experiences, and address global challenges collaboratively.
Comparative politics enhances understanding of cultural, historical, and
institutional factors shaping governance, facilitating informed decision-making and
fostering cooperation in international affairs. Comparing political systems across
countries involves analyzing electoral systems, party politics, and policy-making
processes to identify key differences and similarities. Electoral systems vary from
proportional representation to winner-takes-all, influencing party dynamics and
representation. Party politics range from multi-party systems to dominant-party or
two-party systems, impacting governance and policy agendas. Policy-making
processes differ based on executive-legislative relations, bureaucratic structures,
and civil society involvement. Understanding these factors through comparative
analysis sheds light on the strengths and weaknesses of different political systems,
informing discussions on democratic governance, representation, and policy
outcomes globally.

Political studies employ a range of research methodologies, including qualitative

and quantitative methods. Qualitative approaches involve in-depth exploration of
attitudes, behaviors, and processes through methods like interviews, case studies,
and ethnography, providing rich contextual understanding. Quantitative methods
use statistical tools to analyze numerical data from surveys, experiments, and large
datasets, enabling systematic comparison and generalizable findings. Mixed-
methods approaches combine qualitative and quantitative techniques to
complement each other's strengths, offering comprehensive insights into political
phenomena. Researchers choose methodologies based on research questions,
data availability, and desired depth or breadth of analysis, ensuring rigorous and
robust investigations in political studies. Empirical evidence is essential in political
research as it provides a basis for analyzing and understanding political phenomena
objectively. By employing rigorous methods such as surveys, experiments, and
statistical analyses, researchers can generate reliable data to support or challenge
hypotheses and theories. This empirical approach enhances the credibility and
validity of research findings, enabling policymakers and stakeholders to make
informed decisions based on evidence rather than speculation.
Ethical considerations in political research are paramount to protect the rights and
well-being of participants and ensure the integrity of the research process.
Researchers must uphold principles of confidentiality, informed consent, and
respect for diversity and cultural sensitivity. Ethical conduct also involves
transparency in reporting methods and findings, avoiding biases or conflicts of
interest, and adhering to professional standards of conduct. Upholding ethical
principles in political research fosters trust, accountability, and ethical practice in
the field.

Contemporary political issues like climate change policy, migration, human rights,
and terrorism profoundly shape domestic and international politics. Climate change
policy drives debates over environmental regulations, energy transitions, and
international cooperation to mitigate global warming. Migration policies influence
national identities, labor markets, and social cohesion, sparking debates on border
controls, refugee resettlement, and human trafficking. Human rights violations
prompt international condemnation, sanctions, and humanitarian interventions,
affecting diplomatic relations and global governance. Terrorism poses security
threats, leading to counterterrorism measures, intelligence-sharing agreements,
and military interventions, reshaping foreign policies and alliances. These issues
highlight interconnected challenges requiring multilateral responses, impacting
domestic politics through public opinion, electoral outcomes, and policy priorities.
Addressing these complex issues demands nuanced political strategies balancing
national interests with global responsibilities and human rights considerations.
Contemporary political issues like climate change policy, migration, human rights,
and terrorism have significant impacts on both domestic and international politics.
Climate change policies drive national and international agendas, influencing
energy transitions, environmental regulations, and global cooperation. Migration
sparks debates over border security, immigration policies, and refugee resettlement,
shaping domestic demographics and international relations. Human rights
violations lead to diplomatic tensions, sanctions, and humanitarian interventions,
affecting global governance and foreign policies. Terrorism poses security threats,
prompting counterterrorism measures, intelligence-sharing agreements, and
military interventions, reshaping international alliances and security strategies.
These issues highlight the interconnectedness of global politics and the complex
challenges facing policymakers worldwide.
Political studies are crucial for comprehending power dynamics, governance
structures, and societal transformations. They provide insights into how governments
function, policies are formulated, and decisions are made, illuminating the
complexities of political processes. By studying politics, individuals develop critical
thinking skills, analytical abilities, and a deeper understanding of political ideologies
and systems. This knowledge empowers citizens to engage actively in democratic
processes, advocate for change, and contribute to informed decision-making. Political
studies foster informed and engaged citizenship, enabling individuals to navigate
complex political landscapes, address societal challenges, and promote inclusive
governance and social justice.
Assignment Title 2: Political parties in Bangladesh: History and present
status

Bangladesh is a South Asian nation with a populous and dynamic political scene that i
s of great geopolitical significance.Bangladesh, which gained independence in 1971 af
ter a liberation war, has had a multiparty system and a dynamic political environment.
Major political parties like the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and the Awami Leag
ue dominate the political landscape of the nation and have a significant impact on pol
icy and governance.Bangladesh has a significant regional impact on economic, securi
ty dynamics, and diplomatic ties within South Asia due to its advantageous location b
etween India and Myanmar. In democratic system, political parties are essential for
representing the many interests and points of view held by the general public. By
providing citizens with a way to participate in elections and policy advocacy, they
enable political involvement. In democracies, political parties also promote stability
and accountability by offering a disciplined framework for contrasting discourse.
Parties also support the establishment of administrations, the formulation of public
policy, and the maintenance of checks and balances within the political system. Their
importance in maintaining democratic governance is highlighting by their roles in
enerzing the populace, outlining policy platforms, and holding elected officials
responsible.

The assignment will explore the history and current status of political parties in
Bangladesh. It will cover the origins and evolution of major parties ,their ideologies,
leadership, challenges, and controversies. Additionally, it will analyze the present
political scenario, including party influence, electoral performance, and recent
developments.

The historical context of political parties in Bangladesh is deeply rooted in the

country's struggle for independence and subsequent nation-building efforts. Before
independence, during British colonial rule and the partition of India in 1947, political
movements in the region, notably the All India Muslim League, played a crucial role in
advocating for Muslim interests and ultimately led to the creation of Pakistan in 1947.
Following Pakistan's independence, East Pakistan (present-day Bangladesh)
experienced significant political discontent due to economic disparities and cultural
differences with West Pakistan. This discontent culminated in the Bangladesh
Liberation War of 1971, resulting in the emergence of an independent Bangladesh.
Post-independence, political parties in Bangladesh evolved rapidly, with the Awami
League emerging as a dominant force under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur
Rahman, who played a pivotal role in Bangladesh's independence. The Bangladesh
Nationalist Party (BNP) founded by Ziaur Rahman also emerged as a major political
entity. Over the years, political parties in Bangladesh have grappled with issues of
governance, corruption, and electoral competition. The historical context of pre-
independence movements and the subsequent struggle for nation-building have
profoundly shaped the ideologies, leadership, and trajectories of political parties in
Bangladesh, making them instrumental in the country's political development and
democratic processes.

The formation and evolution of major political parties like the Awami League and the
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) in Bangladesh have been influenced by key
political figures, significant events, and distinct ideologies. The Awami League,
founded by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, played a pivotal role in the independence
movement and subsequent nation-building efforts. Mujibur Rahman's leadership and
advocacy for Bengali nationalism were central to the party's ideology, emphasizing
secularism and social justice. The party's support base stemmed from its
commitment to linguistic and cultural rights for Bengalis.

Conversely, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), founded by Ziaur Rahman,

emerged as a major political force with a focus on nationalism and economic self-
reliance. Ziaur Rahman's tenure as president and his policies shaped the party's
ideology, which emphasized a mix of nationalism, populism, and Islamism. The BNP's
support base often included segments of society seeking an alternative to the Awami
League's governance.

Other political figures and events, such as the assassination of Sheikh Mujibur
Rahman in 1975 and subsequent military coups, further influenced the trajectories of
these parties. The evolution of these political entities reflects broader societal and
political changes in Bangladesh, including shifts in governance, electoral dynamics,
and socio-economic priorities. Overall, the ideologies and leadership of key political
figures have been instrumental in shaping the formation, growth, and evolution of
major political parties in Bangladesh's dynamic political landscape.

The prominent political parties in Bangladesh, notably the Awami League and the
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), exhibit distinct ideologies, leadership styles, and
organizational structures. The Awami League, led by Sheikh Hasina, espouses a
platform of secularism, democracy, and social welfare. Under Hasina's leadership, the
party has emphasized economic development, social justice, and inclusive governance.
The Awami League maintains a strong grassroots presence and a hierarchical
organizational structure, with well-defined party structures from local to national levels.

Conversely, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), led by Khaleda Zia and later her son
Tarique Rahman, adopts a nationalist and populist ideology with a blend of Islamism.
The party advocates for economic self-reliance, traditional values, and national
sovereignty. The BNP has a decentralized organizational structure, relying heavily on
charismatic leadership and regional alliances.

Both parties have played critical roles in shaping Bangladesh's political landscape, with
periodic shifts in power between them. The leadership styles of Sheikh Hasina and
Khaleda Zia have influenced their respective parties' ideologies and approaches to
governance. Additionally, the organizational structures of these parties reflect their
strategies for mobilizing support and maintaining political relevance. Despite
ideological differences, both parties have faced challenges such as corruption
allegations and factionalism, impacting their organizational coherence and electoral
strategies. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the role of political
parties in Bangladesh's democratic processes and governance. Below is a comparison
table highlighting the key policies and approaches of the Awami League (AL) and the
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) in addressing socio-economic issues, governance,
and foreign relations:
Aspect Awami League(AL) BNP
Socio-economic policies Emphasis on poverty alleviation, Focus on economic self-reliance,
healthcare, education reform investment, pro-business policies
Governance approach Emphasis on decentralization, Promotes a strong executive,
digital governance emphasizes law and order
Foreign relation strategy Maintains close ties with India, Emphasizes balanced foreign
seeks regional cooperation policy, strengthening regional ties

This table provides a concise overview of the contrasting policies and approaches of the
Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party across key governance areas. Each
party's stance on socio-economic issues, governance, and foreign relations reflects
their ideological orientations and strategic priorities within Bangladesh's political
landscape.

Political parties in Bangladesh encounter numerous challenges that affect their

credibility and governance processes:

Corruption: Rampant corruption within parties undermines public trust and

governance integrity, leading to misuse of power and resources.

Factionalism: Internal divisions and power struggles weaken party cohesion and
decision-making, hindering effective governance and policy implementation.
Electoral Irregularities: Issues like vote rigging, intimidation, and lack of transparency
in electoral processes undermine democratic principles and legitimacy of election
outcomes.

Violence and Instability: Political violence, often stemming from rivalries between
parties, disrupts public order and undermines democratic stability.

Lack of Accountability: Weak accountability mechanisms within parties allow for

impunity, reducing incentives for ethical behavior and good governance.

Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive reforms, including strengthening

institutions, promoting transparency, and fostering a culture of accountability within
political parties. Efforts to combat corruption, mitigate factionalism, ensure fair
elections, and promote rule of law are essential for improving the overall political
environment in Bangladesh.

Notable controversies and conflicts involving political parties in Bangladesh include:

Assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman: The killing of Bangladesh's founding leader

in 1975 led to political instability and subsequent military coups.

2007-2008 Political Crisis: Widespread violence and unrest erupted over election
disputes, leading to a state of emergency and military intervention.

Corruption Allegations: Various parties have faced allegations of corruption and

misuse of power, tarnishing their reputations and eroding public trust.

Electoral Violence: Periodic instances of electoral violence and rigging have marred
the democratic process, raising concerns over fairness and transparency.

These controversies and conflicts underscore the complex dynamics and challenges
within Bangladesh's political landscape, impacting governance, stability, and
democratic norms.

The present status of political parties in Bangladesh reflects a dynamic and competitive
landscape shaped by diverse factors including leadership, governance performance,
and socio-economic conditions. The two major parties, the Awami League (AL) and the
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), continue to dominate the political scene, but their
influence and popularity have fluctuated over time.

The Awami League, under the leadership of Sheikh Hasina, has maintained a strong grip
on power since 2008. The party's policies focusing on economic development, social
welfare programs, and infrastructure projects have contributed to its popularity among
certain segments of the population. The AL's success in recent elections, including
securing a landslide victory in the 2018 polls, underscores its electoral strength and
organizational capacity.

Conversely, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has faced challenges in recent
years, including leadership disputes, legal battles, and internal divisions. Despite these
setbacks, the BNP remains a significant political force with a loyal support base,
particularly in rural areas and among certain demographic groups. The party's
performance in elections has been mixed, with occasional electoral successes but also
periods of decline in popularity.

Overall, other smaller parties and alliances also play a role in Bangladesh's political
landscape, contributing to the diversity of opinions and electoral dynamics. However,
the dominance of the Awami League and the challenges faced by the BNP highlight the
evolving nature of political competition and governance in Bangladesh. Moving forward,
key factors such as economic performance, governance effectiveness, and
demographic shifts will continue to influence the standing and electoral performance of
political parties in Bangladesh.

Recent political developments in Bangladesh have been characterized by shifts in

alliances, emerging trends, and notable events. The Awami League-led government,
under Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, has continued to consolidate power and
implement development initiatives. Recent trends include:

Alliances and Coalitions: The Awami League has strengthened alliances with smaller
parties to bolster its electoral prospects and governance stability.

Youth Engagement: Increased involvement of young voters and leaders in shaping

political discourse, driven by social media and grassroots activism.

Regional Diplomacy: Bangladesh has pursued closer ties with neighboring countries
like India and China, focusing on economic cooperation and infrastructure
development.

Challenges to Democracy: Ongoing debates and challenges surrounding democratic

norms, including concerns over media freedom and human rights.

These developments reflect a complex political landscape influenced by internal and

external dynamics. As Bangladesh navigates these trends, the evolving nature of
political alliances, youth engagement, and diplomatic strategies will continue to shape
the country's political future and governance priorities.

The history and contemporary state of political parties in Bangladesh reveal a dynamic
landscape shaped by significant historical events, ideologies, and leadership. Major
parties like the Awami League and Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) have evolved
through phases of struggle for independence, governance challenges, and electoral
competition. Presently, the Awami League maintains dominance with its focus on
development and social welfare, while the BNP faces internal divisions and electoral
setbacks. Smaller parties and alliances contribute to the diverse political discourse.
Challenges such as corruption, factionalism, and electoral irregularities persist,
underscoring the complexities of Bangladesh's political environment.

Political parties play a pivotal role in shaping Bangladesh's governance and future
trajectory by articulating policy agendas, mobilizing public support, and influencing
decision-making processes. The dominance of major parties like the Awami League and
BNP has a profound impact on governance outcomes and policy priorities. The
effectiveness of political parties in addressing socio-economic challenges, promoting
democratic values, and fostering stability determines the country's developmental
trajectory. However, internal challenges within parties, such as corruption and
factionalism, pose obstacles to effective governance and hinder long-term
development goals. Ultimately, the role of political parties in Bangladesh is
instrumental in determining the country's path towards prosperity, democratic
consolidation, and socio-political stability.

Assignment Title 3: Capitalism

Capitalism is an economic system characterized by private ownership of the means of

production, where individuals and businesses own and control resources, goods, and
services. Karl Marx's "Das Kapital": Karl Marx, in his seminal work "Das Kapital," defines
capitalism as a mode of production characterized by private ownership of the means of
production (such as factories and machinery) and wage labor. Adam Smith's "The
Wealth of Nations": Adam Smith, considered the father of modern economics,
describes capitalism as an economic system based on self-interest and competition.
Key features include:
Private Ownership: Individuals and corporations have the right to own property and
resources, including factories, land, and machinery.

Free Markets: Prices and production are determined by competition and supply and
demand rather than government control.

Profit Motive: The driving force behind economic activities is the pursuit of profit and
self-interest.

The purpose of this assignment is to critically analyze the evolution and impact of
capitalism. By examining its historical development, key features, societal implications,
and political dimensions, we aim to gain a deeper understanding of capitalism's role in
shaping modern economies and societies.

According to Wikipedia, Capitalism is an economic and political system in which a

country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit. It refers to an
economic system in which a society's means of production are held by private
individuals or organizations, not the government, and where products, prices, and the
distribution of goods are determined mainly by competition in a free market.

Capitalism has undergone significant transformations since its emergence in the late
Middle Ages and the early modern period. Its evolution has been influenced by
historical events, intellectual developments, and changes in societal structures. This
assignment will explore these aspects to provide a comprehensive analysis of
capitalism and its effects on various facets of human life.

Understanding the evolution of capitalism is crucial for assessing its contemporary

impact and addressing ongoing debates surrounding economic inequality,
environmental sustainability, and social justice. Through this critical analysis, we will
evaluate both the strengths and shortcomings of capitalism as an economic system.

Modern capitalist theory is traditionally traced to the 18th-century treatise An Inquiry

into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations by Scottish political economist
Adam Smith, and the origins of capitalism as an economic system can be placed in the
16th century. Most of the existing capitalist economies are mixed economies that
combine elements of free markets with state intervention and in some cases economic
planning. Capitalism in its modern form emerged from agrarianism in England, as well
as mercantilist practices by European countries between the 16 th and 18th
centuries.There are six types of capitalism: oligarchic capitalism, state-guided
capitalism, corporate capitalism, entrepreneurial capitalism, laissez-faire capitalism,
and welfare capitalism.
1. Oligarchic Capitalism: Under oligarchic capitalism, a small group of elite capitalists (the
oligarchs) have taken over not only the economic system but also the political system.
2. State-Guided Capitalism: Unlike oligarchic capitalism where the economy is controlled
by a few private individuals for their private benefit, under state-guided capitalism the
economy is mostly controlled by the state (the government).
3. Corporate Capitalism: Corporate capitalism refers to an economic system where big
companies (corporations) have a controlling position on the market. It is usually achieved
through neoliberal policies.
4. Entrepreneurial Capitalism: Entrepreneurial capitalism is based on the work of free
market entrepreneurs. These will typically be small-scale businesses, perhaps composed of
just one owner and a few employees.
5. Laissez-Faire Capitalism: Laissez-faire (French for “let do”) capitalism is based on
letting people do as much as they want, with minimal interference from the state. It is the
complete absence of state intervention in the market.
6. Welfare State Capitalism: The government plays a major role in welfare state capitalism.
Unlike in state-guided capitalism, welfare state capitalism is based on using the state to
redistribute some of the resources of the economy.

Advantage of capitalism is more attractive and also disadvantage of capitalism is so

dangerous. Now focus on those discuss, Capitalism, as an economic system, offers several
advantages that have contributed to its widespread adoption and success in many parts of the
world. Some of the key advantages of capitalism include:
Efficient Allocation of Resources: In a capitalist system, resources are allocated based on
market forces of supply and demand. This allocation tends to be efficient because prices serve
as signals for producers and consumers, guiding them towards where resources are most
needed or valued.
Incentive for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Capitalism encourages innovation and
entrepreneurship by rewarding individuals and businesses that develop new ideas, products,
or services. The potential for profit motivates investment in research, development, and risky
ventures, driving technological progress and economic growth.
Economic Freedom and Individual Choice: Capitalism prioritizes economic freedom,
allowing individuals to make choices regarding employment, consumption, and investment
based on their preferences and circumstances. This freedom fosters individual autonomy and
personal responsibility.
Competitive Markets: Capitalism promotes competition among businesses, which can lead
to lower prices, higher quality goods and services, and greater efficiency. Competition
incentivizes firms to continuously improve and adapt to consumer preferences.
Higher Standard of Living: Over time, capitalism has been associated with rising standards of
living for many people. Economic growth driven by capitalism has led to increased
productivity, higher wages, and improved access to goods and services, contributing to
overall prosperity.
Diverse Range of Products and Services: Capitalism encourages diversity in the
marketplace, allowing for a wide range of products and services to meet varying consumer
needs and preferences. This diversity promotes innovation and supports niche markets.
Adaptability and Resilience: Capitalist economies are often more adaptable and resilient to
change compared to centrally planned economies. The decentralized nature of decision-
making and the flexibility of market mechanisms enable economies to adjust to external
shocks and evolving conditions.
Encourages Savings and Investment: Capitalism encourages savings and investment by
providing opportunities for individuals to accumulate wealth through property ownership,
investment in financial markets, or entrepreneurship. This accumulation of capital facilitates
economic growth and development.
The impact of capitalism on society encompasses a range of complex and interrelated social
dynamics, influencing everything from income distribution to cultural norms and individual
aspirations.
Income Inequality: Capitalism has been associated with widening income inequality. While
capitalism can generate wealth and economic growth, it often concentrates wealth in the
hands of a few individuals or corporations. This disparity can lead to social stratification and
unequal access to resources and opportunities.
Social Mobility: Capitalism's impact on social mobility is a subject of debate. While
proponents argue that capitalism promotes meritocracy and allows individuals to rise based
on talent and effort, critics point to persistent barriers to mobility, such as unequal access to
education and economic resources.
Consumerism: Capitalism is closely linked with consumer culture, where economic success
is often equated with consumption and material wealth. This emphasis on consumption can
shape societal values, encouraging a focus on material possessions and instant gratification.
Cultural Values: Capitalism influences cultural values by promoting individualism,
entrepreneurship, and competition. The pursuit of economic success can prioritize self-
interest over collective well-being, potentially impacting community ties and social cohesion.
Individual Aspirations: Capitalism shapes individual aspirations by emphasizing economic
achievement and personal success. The desire for financial stability and upward mobility
drives individuals to pursue education, career advancement, and entrepreneurial endeavors.
Societal Norms: Capitalism can reshape societal norms by commodifying social
relationships and cultural practices. It promotes market-oriented behaviors and values,
impacting traditional social structures and fostering new forms of social interaction.
Capitalism's impact on society is profound and multifaceted. While it has spurred innovation,
economic growth, and individual opportunity, it has also raised concerns about inequality,
consumerism, and cultural homogenization. Understanding these social implications is
essential for critically assessing the role of capitalism in shaping contemporary societies and
informing discussions about economic policy and social welfare.

The relationship between capitalism and politics is complex and multifaceted, involving
debates over the appropriate role of government in economic affairs and the regulation of
markets.
Government Regulation: In capitalist economies, governments play a crucial role in
regulating markets to ensure fair competition, protect consumers, and prevent monopolistic
practices. Regulations may also address externalities such as pollution or promote social
welfare through policies like minimum wages or social safety nets.
Promotion of Competition: Capitalism relies on competition to drive innovation and
efficiency. Governments often intervene to promote competition by enforcing antitrust laws,
breaking up monopolies, and implementing policies that encourage market entry and
diversity.
Addressing Market Failures: Capitalist economies are susceptible to market failures such as
asymmetric information, public goods provision, and externalities. Governments intervene to
correct these failures through policies like taxation, subsidies, and public provision of goods
and services.
Ideological Debates: Ideological debates surrounding capitalism include neoliberalism,
which advocates for minimal government intervention and free markets, and state capitalism,
where governments play a significant role in economic planning and investment. These
debates reflect differing views on the balance between market freedoms and government
oversight in capitalist societies.
Overall, the relationship between capitalism and politics underscores the importance of
governance in shaping economic outcomes and addressing societal challenges within
capitalist frameworks. The nature and extent of government intervention vary across
countries and are often influenced by ideological perspectives and pragmatic considerations.
Capitalism has faced extensive critique from various perspectives, highlighting both its
strengths and significant shortcomings.
Marxist Critique: Marxist critiques of capitalism emphasize exploitation of labor and
inherent contradictions leading to economic crises. Marxists argue that capitalism perpetuates
class inequality and concentrates wealth and power in the hands of a few capitalists, leading
to alienation and social unrest.
Feminist Critique: Feminist critiques of capitalism focus on how it reinforces gender
inequalities, such as the undervaluation of women's labor, unequal access to economic
opportunities, and the commodification of care work. Capitalism is seen as perpetuating
patriarchal norms and contributing to gender-based discrimination.
Ecological Critique: Environmental critiques of capitalism highlight its role in promoting
unsustainable resource exploitation and environmental degradation. Capitalism's emphasis on
growth and profit often leads to overconsumption, pollution, and ecological destruction,
undermining long-term environmental sustainability.
Wealth Concentration: Capitalism has been criticized for exacerbating income and wealth
inequality, with a significant portion of wealth accruing to a small elite. This concentration of
wealth can lead to social instability, reduced social mobility, and increased political influence
of the wealthy.
As we delve into the complexities of capitalism, it becomes apparent that this economic
system embodies both remarkable virtues and troubling dilemmas. On one hand, capitalism
fuels innovation, fosters competition, and propels economic growth at unprecedented rates.
Yet, on the other hand, it perpetuates disparities in wealth, raises ethical questions about
exploitation, and grapples with sustainability in a resource-constrained world. The allure of
capitalism lies in its promise of opportunity and prosperity, yet we cannot overlook the
widening gap between the haves and the have-nots, nor the environmental toll of unchecked
growth. How do we reconcile the pursuit of profit with the imperative of social equity and
ecological balance? As we confront the ambiguities of capitalism, let us challenge ourselves
to envision a future where economic progress harmonizes with human dignity and
environmental stewardship. Perhaps the true essence of this debate lies not in advocating for
one extreme over another, but in reimagining a capitalism that is equitable, inclusive, and
sustainable for generations to come. Let us depart today not with definitive answers, but with
the questions that propel us towards a more just and conscientious economic order. This
conclusion aims to prompt introspection and discussion by acknowledging the complexities
of capitalism while encouraging to contemplate its broader implications and potential for
transformation.
Reference:
1. Almond, G. A., & Powell Jr., G. B. (1984). Comparative politics: A developmental
approach. Little, Brown.
2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative,
and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
3. Disalvo, Daniel (1 April 2013). "The Politics of Studying Politics: Political Science
Since the 1960s". Society. 50 (2): 132–139. doi:10.1007/s12115-013-9631-
7. ISSN 1936-4725. S2CID 255514132
4. Ahmed, Helal Uddin. Bangladesh: Past and Present. University Press Limited, 2004.
5. Riaz, Ali. Bangladesh: A Political History Since Independence. I.B. Tauris, 2010.
6. Khan, M. A. Muqtedar. "Political Parties and Democratization in Bangladesh."
Journal of Asian and African Studies, vol. 33, no. 4, 1998, pp. 407-421.
7. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers.
8. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Literature,
52(2), 518-523.
9. Daniel, B.(1972).The culture contradiction of capitalism.(Book).University of
ILLINOIS press.