Full Chapter Regionalism in Africa and External Partners Uneven Relationships and Unintended Effects 1St Edition Johannes Muntschick PDF
Full Chapter Regionalism in Africa and External Partners Uneven Relationships and Unintended Effects 1St Edition Johannes Muntschick PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-southern-african-
development-community-sadc-and-the-european-union-eu-regionalism-
and-external-influence-1st-edition-johannes-muntschick-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/transforming-education-outcomes-
in-africa-learning-from-togo-johannes-hoogeveen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/exchange-rate-second-round-
effects-and-inflation-processes-evidence-from-south-africa-
eliphas-ndou/
https://textbookfull.com/product/zen-and-psychotherapy-partners-
in-liberation-2nd-edition-joseph-bobrow/
China’s Uneven and Combined Development Steven Rolf
https://textbookfull.com/product/chinas-uneven-and-combined-
development-steven-rolf/
https://textbookfull.com/product/hemispheric-regionalism-romance-
and-the-geography-of-genre-1st-edition-woertendyke/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-theoretical-and-practical-
dimensions-of-regionalism-in-east-asia-1st-edition-karolina-
klecha-tylec-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nordic-states-and-european-
integration-awkward-partners-in-the-north-1st-edition-malin-
stegmann-mccallion/
https://textbookfull.com/product/coulson-and-richardsons-
chemical-engineering-fourth-edition-volume-3a-chemical-and-
biochemical-reactors-and-reaction-engineering-r-ravi/
Regionalism in
Africa and
External Partners
Uneven Relationships
and (Un)Intended Effects
Edited by
Johannes Muntschick
Regionalism in Africa and External Partners
Johannes Muntschick
Editor
Regionalism in Africa
and External Partners
Uneven Relationships and (Un)Intended Effects
Editor
Johannes Muntschick
Institute of Political Science
Johannes Gutenberg University
of Mainz
Bamberg, Germany
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such
names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for
general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa-
tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither
the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with
respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been
made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
v
vi PREFACE
Part I Introduction
1 Introduction and Theorising: Regionalism and External
Actors 3
Johannes Muntschick
ix
x CONTENTS
Part IV Conclusions
9 Conclusion 221
Johannes Muntschick
Index 239
Notes on Contributors
xi
xii NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS
xv
xvi ABBREVIATIONS
xix
List of Tables
xxi
PART I
Introduction
CHAPTER 1
Johannes Muntschick
Over the past few decades, there has been a wave of new regionalism with
new or renewed regional organisations being born across the globe. At
the same time, the relations and interactions between world regions grew
stronger and the modes of institutionalised cooperation between regional
organisations (ROs) intensified significantly. There is little doubt that the
end of the Cold War paved the ‘road to regionalism’ (Börzel et al., 2012)
and that globalisation and growing patterns of regional and inter-regional
interdependence had a catalytic effect on new regional integration initia-
tives. Above all other world regions, the Global South and notably Africa
experienced a mushrooming of regionalism in the 1990s. This reflects not
only in the sheer number of regional institutions and cooperation projects
in a wide array of policy areas but also in the phenomenon of overlapping
regionalism that we observe today (Panke & Stapel, 2018).
J. Muntschick (B)
Institute of Political Science, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz,
Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
Many countries and ROs in the Global South, however, show distinct
patterns of asymmetric extra-regional interdependence with external
actors—mainly in the northern hemisphere—in various policy areas
(Muntschick, 2013, 2018). This is most evident in the area of the
economy and reflects inter alia in the patterns of trade, foreign direct
investment flows or donor funding (see Brosig, Chapter 2; Söderbaum &
Stapel, Chapter 3). Whether this pattern of asymmetric extra-regional
interdependence is a lasting legacy of colonialism is not entirely clear.
It is most evident, however, between African countries or African ROs
and their counterparts in Europe (Axline, 1977; Krapohl & Fink, 2013;
Stapel & Söderbaum, 2020).
Against this background, there is good reason to believe that such
a ‘shadow-structure’ of asymmetric extra-regional interdependence has
an impact on the emergence, dynamics, institutional design, and perfor-
mance of regionalism in Africa, the Global South or anywhere else where
such patterns exist. Surprisingly, mainstream integration theories have
neglected this important external dimension so far. The aim of this
volume is to address this research gap and provide theoretical models,
theory-informed case studies, empirical insights and explanations on the
phenomenon of African regionalism and external actors/partners.
While the African continent somehow became a laboratory of region-
alism, North-South relations between Europe and Africa also gained
momentum increasingly, broadened in scope, and deepened in substance
in the recent past. Based on experience and its own success story, the
European Union (EU) showed a very keen interest in regionalisms
outside Europe (Farell, 2007). This not only led to growing interde-
pendence and interaction but also materialised in various forums and
institutionalised cooperation initiatives, trade and partnership agreements,
training missions and development support programmes in cooperation
with regional partner organisations in Africa. For the latter, Brussels
became not only a mentor and strategic cooperation partner but also a
key donor and supporter over the recent years. This reflects inter alia in
the Joint Africa-EU Strategy, adopted in 2007, and various EU-Africa
partnership and cooperation programmes such as the 2014 Pan-African
programme, the 2004 African Peace Facility (APF), or the 2015 European
Union Emergency Trust Fund.1
levels in many areas in recent years, notably in the economy and increas-
ingly in the field of security. Yet, academic research on this subject is
still in its infancy compared to the study of (comparative) regionalism
and interregionalism, which is reflected in a growing body of academic
literature.
The scientific debate on regionalism has been strongly influenced by
academic research on Europe and the EU for decades. Accordingly, main-
stream regional integration theories have been developed and designed on
the unique European case (Haas, 1958; Moravcsik, 1998). With the rise
of the so-called new regionalism in the 1990s (Hettne & Söderbaum,
1998; Robson, 1993), political science and international relations studies
paid increasing attention to this new phenomenon, which showed most
dynamics in economically less developed regions in the Global South.
Besides the growing scholarly attention and research over the past years,
there exist still few theory-driven studies that explicitly aim at analysing
and explaining regional integration beyond Europe, which should include
attempts to overcome the specific scope conditions and inherent Euro-
centrism of mainstream integration theories (Hettne & Söderbaum,
1998). The following paragraphs sketch out the advancement of political
science research on regionalism over the past years.
Systematic research on regionalism outside Europe probably began
with the so-called ‘new regionalism approach’ (Hettne & Söderbaum,
1998; Robson, 1993). This school of thought focussed on the global
South—mainly sub-Saharan Africa—and attempted to analyse and explain
regional cooperation and institution-building through a multifaceted
approach that also referred to non-state actors, transnational networks,
micro-level cooperation and informal institutions. One approach among
other innovations was certainly that it recognised the conditions of limited
statehood in many parts of the southern hemisphere. Consequently, the
focus was not only on the state as a central actor but also on non-state
actors and less formalised modes of regional cooperation (Bach, 2003;
Grant & Söderbaum, 2003). However, the new regionalism approach
did not explicitly consider patterns of extra-regional dependency nor the
potential role and influence of external actors.
International political economy approaches to the study of regionalism
are not inherently Euro-centric and claim universal validity. In general,
they assume that an adequate combination of demand and supply factors
is crucial for successful regionalism. Driven by an economically moti-
vated demand for regional (economic) integration, regionalism shows
8 J. MUNTSCHICK
involved (Grimmel & Rüland, 2015: 42; Mattheis, 2020; Mattheis &
Litsegård, 2018).
So far, comparably little theoretical or empirical research has considered
explicitly and systematically the importance of extra-regional relations and
the role and potential impact of external actors and external influence on
regionalism. This is surprising given the fact of structural imbalances and
asymmetric patterns of interdependence between countries and regional
actors across the world, not to forget that power and political influence
are key factors in international relations theory and research (Keohane &
Nye, 2001; Waltz, 1979). Axline (1977) and Zimmerling (1991) are
among the few who noted several decades ago that exogenous factors
deserve analytic attention because they are relevant for regional integra-
tion processes, particularly in economically dependent and less developed
countries and regions. However, only a few scholars explicitly referred
to external actors and impact in their research on regionalism, often in
an African context (e.g. Brosig, 2011; Haastrup, 2013; Klingebiel, 2005;
Lenz & Burilkov, 2017). In terms of theory, Muntschick (2013, 2018)
developed a modified situation-structural approach to theorise and explain
regionalism and external influence, and applied it to the analysis of region-
alism in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) across
various policy areas. Other works followed, including an edited volume
with comparative case studies and a focus on the economy (Krapohl,
2017). More recently, detailed studies on external donor funding and
the finances of regional organisations in the Global South have been
published (Engel & Mattheis, 2020; Söderbaum, 2017).
In light of the gaps and research state outlined above, there is a
strong need for theory-guided and systematic research on regionalism
which takes into account the specific nature of extra-regional relation-
ships and the role and impact of external actors. With respect to theory,
this implies going beyond mainstream integration theories and inherent
Euro-centrism. It also means developing and applying theoretical models
that have good explanatory power regardless of geography and the level
of socio-economic development.
In addition to research gaps in political science theory regarding
regionalism and external actors in general, there exists yet comparably
little knowledge and academic literature about security cooperation in
African ROs. This is surprising, given the fact that the number of conflicts
in Africa rose significantly in the past two decades (Palik et al., 2020).
At the same time, empirical observation indicates that African ROs have
10 J. MUNTSCHICK
Regionalism
In political science and IR studies, regions are often conceptualised as
macro-regions, which are intergovernmental or supranational subsystems
within the international system. Their constituents are states that share
some degree of interdependence in one contiguous region (Hettne, 2005:
544; Nye, 1968: VII). A good working definition of regionalism should
therefore include geographic proximity as a key criterion. Without such
a geographic delimitation “the term ‘regionalism’ becomes diffuse and
unmanageable” (Hurrell, 1995: 333). It could not be differentiated from
any other international group of countries or governance institution.
Against this background, regionalism shall be understood as a planned,
multilateral and state-led organisation of interdependence within a
confined regional space that manifests in various, multidimensional or
specific regional projects and accompanying formal institutions (Bach,
2003: 22; Breslin & Higgot, 2000: 344; Stein, 1993: 316). The EU is
a good example of this understanding because one can perceive it as a
state-driven multi-layered system of nested cooperation projects and issue-
specific institutions—sometimes on a variable geometry basis—under the
umbrella of a common organisational superstructure and regional gover-
nance institutions (Gehring, 1994: 216; Moravcsik, 1998: 15). This
state-centric concept of regionalism might be limited in a way, as it does
not account for socially constructed and informal regional governance
institutions. It acknowledges, however, the fact that states are (still) the
12 J. MUNTSCHICK
Length to end of tail 3 7 1/2/12 inches; bill along the ridge 8 3/4/12; wing
from flexure 1 10/12; tail 1 1 1/2/12.
Cleome heptaphylla.
Strix Tengmalmi, Gmel. Syst. Nat. vol. i. p. 291.—Lath. Ind. Ornith. vol. i. p.
65.
Strix Tengmalmi, Tengmalm’s Owl, Swains. and Richards. Fauna Bor.-
Amer. vol. ii. p. 94.
Anas hyperborea, Gmel. Syst. Nat. vol. i. p. 504.—Lath. Ind. Orn. vol. ii. p.
837.
Snow Goose, Anas hyperborea, Wils. Amer. Ornith. vol. viii. p. 76, pl. 68,
fig. 3, Male, and p. 89, pl. 69, fig. 5, Young.
Anser hyperboreus, Ch. Bonaparte, Synopsis of Birds of United States, p.
376.
Anser hyperboreus, Snow Goose, Richards. and Swains. Fauna Bor.-
Amer. vol. ii. p. 467.
Snow Goose, Nuttall, Manual, vol. ii. p. 344.
Tetrao Phasianellus, Linn. Syst. Nat. vol. i. p. 273.—Lath. Ind. Ornith. vol.
ii. p. 635.—Ch. Bonaparte, Synopsis of Birds of United States, p. 127.
Tetrao Phasianellus, Sharp-tailed Grous, Ch. Bonaparte, Amer. Ornith.
vol. iii. p. 37, pl. 19.
Tetrao (centrocercus) Phasianellus, Swains. Sharp-tailed Grous,
Richards. and Swains. Fauna Bor.-Amer. vol. ii. p. 361.
Sharp-tailed Grous, Nuttall, Manual, vol. i. p. 669.
This Owl is much more abundant in our Middle and Eastern Atlantic
Districts than in the Southern or Western parts. My friend Dr
Bachman has never observed it in South Carolina; nor have I met
with it in Louisiana, or any where on the Mississippi below the
junction of the Ohio. It is not very rare in the upper parts of Indiana,
Illinois, Ohio, and Kentucky, wherever the country is well wooded. In
the Barrens of Kentucky its predilection for woods is rendered
apparent by its not being found elsewhere than in the “Groves;” and
it would seem that it very rarely extends its search for food beyond
the skirts of those delightful retreats. In Pennsylvania, and elsewhere
to the eastward, I have found it most numerous on or near the banks
of our numerous clear mountain streams, where, during the day, it is
not uncommon to see it perched on the top of a low bush or fir. At
such times it stands with the body erect, but the tarsi bent and
resting on a branch, as is the manner of almost all our Owls. The
head then seems the largest part, the body being much more
slender than it is usually represented. Now and then it raises itself
and stands with its legs and neck extended, as if the better to mark
the approach of an intruder. Its eyes, which were closed when it was
first observed, are opened on the least noise, and it seems to squint
at you in a most grotesque manner, although it is not difficult to