Full Chapter The Physical Processes and Observing Techniques of Radio Astronomy An Introduction Thomas G Pannuti PDF
Full Chapter The Physical Processes and Observing Techniques of Radio Astronomy An Introduction Thomas G Pannuti PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-introduction-to-radio-
astronomy-4th-edition-bernard-f-burke/
https://textbookfull.com/product/visual-astronomy-under-dark-
skies-a-new-approach-to-observing-deep-space-the-patrick-moore-
practical-astronomy-series-2005th-edition-cooke-antony/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-caucasus-an-introduction-
thomas-de-waal/
https://textbookfull.com/product/gravitational-wave-physics-and-
astronomy-an-introduction-to-theory-experiment-and-data-
analysis-1st-edition-anderson-warren-g-creighton-jolien-d-e/
Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy 3rd
Edition A. Richard Thompson
https://textbookfull.com/product/interferometry-and-synthesis-in-
radio-astronomy-3rd-edition-a-richard-thompson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/making-stars-physical-the-
astronomy-of-sir-john-herschel-stephen-case/
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-introduction-to-the-
technique-of-formative-processes-in-set-theory-domenico-cantone/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-dictionary-of-physical-
geography-fourth-edition-thomas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/political-science-an-
introduction-michael-g-roskin/
Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics
Thomas G. Pannuti
The Physical
Processes and
Observing Techniques
of Radio Astronomy
An Introduction
Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics
Series Editors
Neil Ashby, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
William Brantley, Department of Physics, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA
Matthew Deady, Physics Program, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, USA
Michael Fowler, Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville,
VA, USA
Morten Hjorth-Jensen, Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Michael Inglis, Department of Physical Sciences, SUNY Suffolk County
Community College, Selden, NY, USA
Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics (ULNP) publishes authoritative texts
covering topics throughout pure and applied physics. Each title in the series is
suitable as a basis for undergraduate instruction, typically containing practice
problems, worked examples, chapter summaries, and suggestions for further
reading.
The purpose of ULNP is to provide intriguing, absorbing books that will continue
to be the reader’s preferred reference throughout their academic career.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer International Publishing
Switzerland
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
For Angie and Michael—my wife and my son,
my loves and my world.
For my mother Mary, who nurtured and
encouraged my scientific curiosity since my
earliest years. This book is dedicated to her
loving memory.
For all of my family members and their
boundless love and support over the years.
“You can observe a lot by just
watching.”—Yogi Berra
Preface
The content of this book was first gathered as the substance for a course on radio
astronomy that is taught once an academic year at Morehead State University.
The students who typically enroll in this course are physics majors pursuing
a concentration in astrophysics as well as space systems engineering majors.
Nominally, both types of students enrolled in this class are juniors and seniors and
the class itself is a graduation requirement for each type of student. The structure
of the course includes lectures as well as the remote observation of prominent radio
sources with the 21 Meter Space Tracking Antenna that is adjacent to campus and
operated by the Space Science Center of the Department of Physics, Earth Sciences
and Space Systems Engineering of Morehead State University.
I have personally taught this course since the Fall 2010 semester and guided
its development: as I taught the class, I found myself unable to find a textbook
with sufficiently detailed descriptions of natural phenomena and their accompanying
physical processes along with examples and problems that illustrate these concepts
as well as facilitate understanding by students of these phenomena. To help fill this
void, I prepared my own lectures, exams, and homework assignments for the course:
these prepared materials form the basis of this text.
Radio astronomy is an extremely vast subject spanning many fields of physics,
engineering, and computer science: thus, no single textbook—especially a textbook
intended for a single-semester undergraduate-level course—could do the entire field
as a whole justice. In recognition of this reality coupled with the need to reconcile
the scope of the textbook with a semester-long course, I have first provided a
background review of some pertinent basic concepts that is relevant to the text that
follows, such as angles and angular measurement (which segues into a discussion
about sky coordinate systems), gravity, orbits, and orbital motion (with a discussion
and review of Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion), light (with treatment of
both wave- and particle-like properties, the polarization of light—which is essential
knowledge to master in radio astronomy—along with the Doppler Effect), and
finally the Bohr model of the atom and relativity. The instructor of the course and
the students may proceed with this chapter as a whole or in part—or omit it in
whole or in part—based on the level of preparation of the students and the scope
vii
viii Preface
of the course. After the review of background physics concepts, I have chosen to
concentrate on the most commonly encountered physical processes encountered in
radio astronomy (namely, synchrotron radiation, thermal bremsstrahlung emission,
and molecular transitions), thus laying the foundation when astronomical sources
that emit copious amounts of radiation through these processes are encountered later
in the text.
Following the discussions about the background physical processes, I next
discuss the principles and techniques of radio astronomy, namely the observing
strategies of single dish radio telescopes and interferometers. As part of this dis-
cussion, I emphasize presenting some commonly encountered equations that will be
useful for computing such crucial properties as the sensitivity of the radio telescope
or interferometer. In this context, I also provide a description of Fourier transforms:
my motivation for providing treatment of Fourier transforms here is twofold. Firstly,
Fourier transforms are clearly relevant in the creation of astronomical sources at
all wavelengths and not solely at the radio. Secondly, because Fourier transforms
will be encountered by both types of students whom have typically enrolled in my
radio astronomy class (specifically, in higher-level physics and mathematics courses
for the physics majors and higher-level engineering courses for the space science
majors), I feel that an exposure to Fourier transforms in this context is timely and
helpful to the students. For similar reasons, I have presented a discussion in this
chapter about Bessel functions as well. In this chapter (and, for that matter, in this
textbook), I do not provide a very rigorous treatment about the hardware involved
in radio astronomy: I have taken this approach for two reasons. Firstly, the available
literature on hardware for radio astronomy is already quite plentiful. Secondly, to
keep the scope of the material that may be covered by this book within the time
frame of a semester, I have elected not to provide much discussion on this topic.
In the remaining chapters, discussions are presented in turn about radio observa-
tions of sources in the Solar System, the Galaxy, external galaxies, and cosmology
itself. It is clearly beyond the scope of any text to provide very detailed descriptions
of radio observations (and the insights revealed by these observations) of all types
of astronomical sources, so these chapters are best viewed as an attempt to cover in
a broad manner the types of astronomical sources that are currently the subjects of
extensive study and coverage in the modern research literature on radio astronomy.
I hope this textbook proves useful for both instructors and students who are
exploring radio astronomy as part of a broader study of astrophysics or space
science. I welcome feedback and comments from all readers to help improve the
quality of this work.
Significant efforts like the creation of a textbook over such an expansive topic as
radio astronomy are never created in a vacuum, and the present work is no exception.
I would like to express my most heartfelt thanks to the following people, without
whom the dream of this textbook would never have been realized.
Thanks to everyone at Springer Publishing for shepherding this effort to com-
pletion. I would like to thank Hannah Kaufman, Silembarasan Panneerselvam,
Mario Gabriele and Jeffrey Taub for guiding me through the process of writing
this book, making all of the necessary arrangements, fielding all of my questions,
and providing boundless encouragement along the way. Thanks also to Nora Rawn
from Springer Publishing for also assisting in the development of the manuscript as
well.
Thanks to Morehead State University for granting me a sabbatical during the
2014–2015 academic year to concentrate on the writing of this textbook. Thanks
to the Director of the Space Science Center and my former department chair—
Dr. Benjamin Malphrus—for encouraging the development of astronomy courses
and a research program in astrophysics centered on undergraduate students within
the Space Science Center at the Department of Physics, Earth Sciences, and Space
Systems Engineering (formerly the Department of Earth and Space Sciences) at
Morehead State University. Thanks to Space Science Center staff engineers Mike
Combs, Bob Kroll, and Jeff Kruth for keeping the 21 Meter Space Tracking
Antenna at the Space Science Center in working order and capable of making
sensitive astronomical observations. Thanks also to Jeff Kruth for his willingness
to give guest lectures in my courses on the hardware of radio astronomy. Special
thanks to my colleagues in the Department of Physics, Earth Sciences, and Space
Systems Engineering at Morehead State University: to Professor Eric Jerde for
his encouragement of this work as department chairperson and Professor Dirk
Grupe for helping to “field test” lectures, homework assignments, and examinations
that I had prepared for the course during the Fall 2014 semester while I was on
sabbatical. Thanks as well to Dr. Chuck Conner for useful discussions about Fourier
Transforms.
ix
x Acknowledgements
Thanks also to all of the Morehead State University students who have taken this
course over the years and provided useful feedback on all of the course content that
formed the basis of this book. Among the many students who provided feedback,
I’d like to specifically thank Kristen Ammons, Megan Conley, Ethan Palmer and
Katerina Winters. Special thanks to Mikey Awbrey, Matthew Hezelstine, and Marina
Vitatoe—all graduates of Morehead State University—for preparing many of the
figures seen in the book. Thanks also to Evan van Daniker of the Craft Academy for
also providing comments and feedback on the text.
Thanks to Dr. Elias Brinks who taught me the fundamentals of radio astronomy
in a graduate and advanced undergraduate level course on the subject when I was a
bright-eyed first-year graduate student at the Department of Physics and Astronomy
at the University of New Mexico. The content presented by Dr. Brinks in that
course helped form many of my ideas for teaching radio astronomy, and those
ideas are fleshed out in the present textbook. Thanks also to my dissertation advisor
Dr. Nebojsa Duric who taught me so much about radio astronomy as I worked to
complete my dissertation topic.
I am very grateful to the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) who
provided financial support and wonderful hospitality for my sabbatical visit to
the Science Operations Center (SOC) at Socorro during the Fall 2014 semester.
Thanks to SOC Director Dr. Dale Frail for arranging the funding for my sabbatical
visit, providing a welcoming atmosphere, offering feedback on an earlier version
of this text, and hosting wine tasting parties at his home in Socorro. Thanks to
SOC Assistant Director Dr. Claire Chandler for serving as my host for my visit,
making arrangements for my stay at the SOC, and for providing comments on the
manuscript.
There were many very kind people at Socorro who did so much to make sure
my visit was very pleasant and productive. The SOC is a vibrant and welcoming
facility and there were so many staff members, staff engineers, postdocs, and
staff astronomers who were always welcoming, friendly, and encouraging, whether
assisting me with the writing of this manuscript, inviting me out to weekly social
dinners, or inviting me to join the SOC’s soccer team. Thanks to Skip Lagoyda,
Allen Lewis, Lori Appel, Terry Lopez, and Bernadette Lucero for helping me to
become settled in Socorro and in the SOC and for answering all of my questions,
including ones about the copy machine. The engineers, postdocs, and astronomers
were all very helpful and encouraging in my efforts: many thanks to Brent Avery,
Hichem Ben Frej, Dr. Barry Clark, Dr. Mark Claussen, Dr. Paul Demorest, Dr.
Vivek Dhawan, Steve Durand, Dave Finley, Brian and Marie Glendenning, Dr.
Miller Goss, Dr. Eric Griesen, Dr. Chris Hales, Dr. Hubertus Intema, Preshanth
Jagannathan, Minnie Mao, Drew and Heidi Medlin, Dr. Betsy Mills, Dr. Amy
Mioduszewski, Dr. Steve Meyers, Dr. Juergen Ott, Dr. Frazer Owen, Peggy and
Dr. Rick Perley, Dr. Lorant Sjouwerman, Meri Stanley, Stephan Witz, and Dr. Joan
Wrobel for all that they did during my visit.
Thanks to Judy Stanley and Yvonne Magener—also in the SOC—for kindly
inviting me to participate in public outreach events at the Very Large Array during
Acknowledgements xi
my sabbatical visit to Socorro and encouraging me to help describe the Very Large
Array to members of the general public.
Thanks also to faculty and students at New Mexico Institute of Mining and
Technology at Socorro—namely, Crystal Anderson, Dr. Jean Eilek, and Dr. Dave
Westpfahl—who also provided feedback and suggestions on the manuscript.
Thanks also to all of the astronomers at other institutions who provided input
and suggestions on the content of the book. To Dr. Tracey DeLaney (West Virginia
Wesleyan College), Dr. Mark Morris (University of California at Los Angeles),
Dr. Ylva Pihlstrom (University of New Mexico), Dr. Thomas Troland (University
of Kentucky), and Dr. Rosa Murphy Williams (Columbus State University), many
thanks for taking the time to review and provide commentary on the text.
Thanks to John Stoke for providing me with many images on behalf of NRAO
for inclusion in this book and for providing feedback on the images as well. Thanks
to Marsha Bishop (Observatory Librarian, NRAO) and Lance Utley (Database
Administrator, NRAO) for helping me obtain resources needed for writing this
book. Thanks as well to Dr. Yuri Kovalev and Dr. Kardashev Nikolay for furnishing
permission to reproduce the figure of the RadioASTRON satellite that appears
in this book. Thanks to Dr. Christina Lacey and Dr. Fabian Walter for granting
permission for figures from their papers to be included in this book.
Thanks to my family for all of their boundless love and support with all of my
efforts over the years. All of my successes in my life would not be possible without
them. My mother Mary always encouraged my interest in science and in particular
loved visiting the Very Large Array—this book is dedicated in part to her loving
memory. To my father Carl, my brothers Paul and Carl Jr., and my sister Joan—
thanks for all of the encouragement that you provided to your brother as he moved
across the country multiple times during his professional career as a scientist.
Last but certainly not least, thanks to Angela Brown Pannuti who one night
accepted my marriage proposal under a canopy of stars and brings light to all of
my days. And to our son Michael Pannuti, who always views the world and the sky
in wonder and fascination: he always inspires us and fills our world with love.
The research for this book has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System.
Contents
xiii
xiv Contents
Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
Solutions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389
Acronyms
xvii
xviii Acronyms
1.1 Introduction
Fig. 1.1 Karl Guthe Jansky with the antenna he constructed in Holmdel, New Jersey, with which
the discovery of the extraterrestrial radio emission (namely, emission from the center of the Milky
Way Galaxy) was made. Image Credit: NRAO/AUI/NSF
artificial sources, such as cellular phone towers and wireless Internet devices, which
have rapidly proliferated. These devices transmit extensive stray radiation at radio
frequencies, thus threatening the environments of radio observatories that were
formerly quite pristine.
The history of radio astronomy may best be described as a story of serendipity.
The birth of radio astronomy is typically attributed to Karl Guthe Jansky (1905–
1950). Jansky earned a bachelor’s degree in physics from the University of
Wisconsin and joined the staff of the Bell Telephone Laboratories in Holmdel,
New Jersey, in 1928. Jansky was tasked with identifying sources of radio static
that affected trans-Atlantic radio communications: to conduct his analysis, he
constructed an antenna with a diameter of approximately 30 m and a height
of approximately 6 m. The antenna was designed to detect radio waves with a
wavelength of 14.6 m (corresponding to a frequency of 20.5 MHz) and rotated
on a turntable so that it could point in any direction (see Fig. 1.1). Rotating the
antenna also allowed Jansky to pinpoint the origin of sources of radio emission. As
expected prior to the start of his observations, Jansky detected radio emission from
several terrestrial sources (namely thunderstorms) but also detected an additional
source of emission from an uncertain origin. Noticing that the intensity of this
4 1 Introduction
peculiar source increased and decreased over the course of a day, Jansky initially
believed that the source of this emission may be the Sun. However, more careful
analysis of this emission revealed that the periodicity of the emission was 23 h
and 56 min, which corresponds to the sidereal day (the period of time required
for the Earth to complete one rotation relative to the reference frame of distant
stars) rather than a solar day (which lasts 24 h and corresponds to the amount of
time required for the Sun to complete one whole path across the sky).3 Comparing
optical maps of the sky with his observations, Jansky realized that the source of
the radio emission corresponded to the Milky Way Galaxy—the home galaxy
to which the Sun belongs—and that this form of emission was strongest in the
direction of the constellation of Sagittarius. Modern astronomers now know that
the supermassive black hole that is located at the center of our Galaxy is coincident
with this peak of strongest emission identified by Jansky: this radio source is now
known as Sagittarius A∗ (pronounced “Sagittarius A-star”).4
The discovery of this unexpected source of radio emission and its remarkable
origin intrigued Jansky: his work represented the first detection of radio emission
from an extraterrestrial source. In 1933, he published his discovery in an engineer-
ing journal as a paper with the somewhat prosaic title “Electrical Disturbances
Apparently of Extraterrestrial Origin” [6]. The title was prosaic in the sense
that it belied the remarkable discovery of radio emission from far beyond the
Earth! Jansky would go on to propose to Bell Laboratories the construction of
a dish antenna with a diameter of 30 m with the purpose of conducting formal
astronomical observations. However, Bell Labs rejected this proposal: with the
origin of the source of noise determined and because this noise did not dramatically
affect commercial communications, the company had no further interest in this
phenomenon and funding its investigation. Furthermore, the United States was
still in the midst of the Great Depression and funding for ambitious new research
apparatus such as the one Jansky proposed was extremely scarce. The onset of World
War II further delayed the development of radio astronomy on an international
scale: in the meantime, Jansky was re-assigned to another research project for Bell
Laboratories and he never conducted any further work on radio astronomy.
Jansky’s crucial discovery attracted little attention from the community of
professional astronomers (or from many scientists or engineers at all), but it did
pique the interest of Grote Reber (1911–2002) (see Fig. 1.2). Reber had earned a
degree in electrical engineering and was an amateur radio operator: he read about
Jansky’s work in 1933 and decided that he wanted to pursue professionally the study
of radio emission from astronomical sources. Reber actually applied for a job at
the Bell Laboratories (the same company that employed Jansky), but unfortunately
the United States was still in the midst of the Great Depression and jobs were not
plentiful at that time. Undeterred, Reber built a radio telescope in a side yard of
his mother’s home in Wheaton, Illinois (see Fig. 1.3). This telescope consisted of a
parabolic metal mirror called a “dish” with a diameter of 9 m that focused incident
radio waves to a receiver located 8 m above the dish. In this respect, Reber’s radio
telescope resembled optical telescopes with reflecting mirrors that feature surfaces
with parabolic shapes, which bring light to a focus at a position in front of the
mirror—this position is known as the prime focus. With its parabolic shape, Reber’s
radio telescope—often considered to be the first radio telescope in the history of
astronomy—strongly resembled modern radio telescopes that also employ dishes
to collect light as well as smaller dishes used to receive and transmit commercial
broadcasts. Reber completed his telescope in 1937: his first receiver operated at a
frequency of 3300 MHz but failed to detect any emission from astronomical sources.
Observations conducted with a second receiver operating at a frequency of 900 MHz
also failed to detect such emission but finally—with a third receiver operating at a
frequency of 160 MHz—Reber at last detected emission from astronomical sources
and thus confirmed Jansky’s discovery. He published his work in the Astrophysical
Journal—a leading international research journal in astronomy and astrophysics—
in 1940 [7]. Besides confirming Jansky’s result with the detection of radio emission
from the Milky Way Galaxy, Reber’s paper also described the detection of radio
emission from the nearby Andromeda Galaxy (also known as M31) and the attempt
to detect radio emission from several bright stars, the Sun, the Mars, and the Orion
Nebula (no emission was detected from any of these three objects). In 1944 Reber
published a second paper in the Astrophysical Journal [8] where he presented a radio
map of the northern sky (that is, the portion of the sky visible to his telescope in
Illinois) made at a frequency of 160 MHz. This map was the first detailed radio map
made of at least a portion of the sky. Not only did his map confirm the presence of
6 1 Introduction
the powerful radio source detected toward the constellation of Sagittarius by Jansky,
but it also contained the first detections of other luminous radio sources seen in the
sky known to modern radio astronomers, such as the supernova remnant Cassiopeia
A and the luminous radio galaxy Cygnus A.
One of the major results of Reber’s research was the first (albeit crude) revela-
tions about the emission processes associated with astronomical sources detected by
radio telescopes. By comparing the amount of light or flux emitted by an object at
different frequencies, a basic understanding of the emission process associated with
the astronomical source (and thus insights into the true nature of the source) may
be gleaned. When radio observations were first conducted, astronomers expected
that the detected emission would be thermal in nature (as modeled as a phenomenon
known as blackbody radiation), in that the amount of detected flux would decrease
with decreasing frequency. Instead, Reber found that while the fluxes from some
astronomical sources did indeed decline as expected, for other sources the amount of
detected flux would in fact increase with decreasing frequency. This result puzzled
astronomers and sources that exhibited such spectral behavior were classified as
“non-thermal.” It was not until the 1950s that astronomers realized that the true
emission process associated with these latter sources was synchrotron radiation,
1.1 Introduction 7
5 Blackbody radiation and synchrotron radiation will be discussed in elaborate detail when emission
and the 500-m Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) are both actually contoured out of natural
valleys. Regarding the RATAN-600 telescope, this telescope is comprised of a large number of
individual reflector units arranged in a circle that direct incoming radiation from astronomical
sources to a central receiver. This telescope thus achieves the angular resolution of a telescope
8 1 Introduction
telescope by a wide margin. To address this shortcoming (in a manner that is cost
effective), astronomers construct multiple radio telescopes and combine signals
from each individual telescope to emulate the angular resolution capabilities of
a single radio telescope with a greater diameter. In fact, the angular resolution
attained by the array of individual radio telescopes is equivalent to that achieved
by a single radio telescope with a diameter corresponding to the distance between
the most widely separate individual radio telescopes. This principle of combining
(“interfering”) signals from multiple radio telescopes to attain superior angular
resolution is known as interferometry, and arrays of radio telescopes that conduct
observations through this principle are known as interferometers.7 The best-known
with a diameter of 600 m. Note, however, that neither RATAN-600 nor FAST nor Arecibo are fully
steerable telescopes and therefore can only observe limited portions of the sky.
7 Interferometry and interferometers will be discussed in more detail when telescopes and observing
Fig. 1.4 The Parkes 64-m radio telescope. Image Credit: Stewart Duff
radio observatory that operates as an interferometer is the Karl G. Jansky Very Large
Array (JVLA) located in New Mexico, United States of America (see Fig. 1.5). The
JVLA conducts observations typically at wavelengths ranging from 0.7 to 400 cm:
it is comprised of 27 individual radio telescopes each with a diameter of 25 m.
The individual telescopes may be moved along railroad tracks to placement in one
of four different main configurations (as driven by different scientific objectives).
The maximum separation between individual telescopes is approximately 36 km
and thus—in that particular configuration—the JVLA may attain the same angular
resolution as a single radio telescope with that diameter. The JVLA is situated on
the Plains of San Agustin that was leveled by an ancient lake: the flat expanse
over which the antennas are situated makes the array of individual antennas to
be roughly co-planar, which simplifies the interference of signals from individual
antennas. Other examples of interferometers currently in operation include the Giant
Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) near Pune, India; the Australia Telescope
Compact Array (ATCA) near Narrabri, Australia; the Westerbork Synthesis Radio
Telescope (WSRT) near Westerbork, the Netherlands, and finally the Dominion
Radio Astrophysical Observatory (DRAO) Synthesis Telescope near Okanagan
Falls, British Columbia, Canada. A listing of well-known radio interferometers is
given in Table 1.2. In modern astronomy, perhaps the most remarkable interfer-
ometer that has recently commenced operations is the Atacama Large Millimeter
Array (ALMA) [9, 10]. Commissioned in 2013 and located in the Atacama desert in
northern Chile, ALMA makes observations at millimeter wavelengths and operates
10 1 Introduction
Fig. 1.5 An image of the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (JVLA). The array is comprised of 27
antennas, each with a diameter of 25 m. Image Credit: W. Grammer, NRAO/AUI/NSF
at an altitude of 5100 m (see Fig. 1.6). The high altitude combined with the
very dry climate of the observatory site serves to minimize the effects of water
vapor, which may dramatically hamper astronomical observations made within this
wavelength range. The placement of an observatory that operates at millimeter
wavelengths at an extremely high altitude helps to illustrate the phenomenon of
atmospheric windows: the atmosphere of the Earth is not equally transparent
to light at all wavelengths but instead is more opaque at some wavelengths than
others.8 For example, the atmosphere is opaque to electromagnetic radiation at
very short wavelengths (namely gamma-ray, X-ray, and ultraviolet radiation): for
this reason, astronomical observations performed at these wavelengths must be
conducted from orbiting observatories placed above the Earth’s atmosphere. In
contrast, electromagnetic radiation at optical wavelengths may be conducted from
sea level because the Earth’s atmosphere is effectively transparent to this radiation.
The transmission characteristics of the Earth’s atmosphere in the radio domain of the
spectrum are complex: the ionosphere of the Earth reflects radiation at the longest
wavelengths (approximately 1 m and greater) into space, making observations of
astronomical sources at these wavelengths impossible. The atmosphere of the Earth
is essentially transparent to electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths on the
order of a centimeter, so observations may be conducted at these wavelengths at
8 The concept of atmospheric windows will be discussed more extensively in Sect. 4.3.
1.1 Introduction 11
Fig. 1.6 The ALMA Array. Notice that the array is composed of a mixture of antennas, some with
diameters of 7-m and some with 12-m. Image Credit: N. Gugliucci, CosmoQuest
Fig. 1.7 The VLBA Antenna in Owens Valley, CA, USA. This antenna is one of the ten that
comprise the VLBA: each one has a diameter of 25 m. Image Credit: NRAO/AUI/NSF
CONNECTICUT.
14 June
2380 Anderson A 64
K 23
16 July
3461 Batchelder Benj
C 17
16 July
3664 Baty John
C 19
14 Aug
7306 Brunkissell H
D 30
14 July
2833 Brennon M
B 3
7 July
3224 Burns Jno
I 12
10414 Blumly E 8 Oct
D 6
Apr
545 Bigelow Wm 7B
14
Nov
11965 Ball H A 3B
11
8 Nov
12089 Brookmeyer T W
H 18
16 Nov
12152 Burke H
D 24
Dec
12209 Bone A 1E
1
14 Oct
10682 Burnham F, Cor
I 11
16 Oct
10690 Barlow O L
E 11
18 Oct
10876 Bennett N
H 13
1 Aug
5806 Brown C H
H 15
Aug
5919 Boyce Wm 7B
17
Aug
6083 Bishop B H Cav 1 I
18
14 Aug
6184 Bushnell Wm
D 19
16 Sept
1763 Bailey F
E 4
21 June
2054 Brewer G E
A 16
6 Aug
5596 Burns B
G 14
5632 Balcomb 11 Aug 64
B 14
16 Aug
5754 Beers James C
A 15
16 Oct
11636 Birdsell D
D 28
July
4296 Blakeslee H Cav 1L
30
18 July
3900 Bishop A
A 24
14 June
1493 Besannon Peter
B 2
30 July
2720 Babcock R
A 1
July
2818 Baldwin Thos Cav 1L
3
16 June
2256 Bosworth A M
D 21
11 Aug
5132 Bougin John
C 8
Brooks Wm D, 16 Aug
5152
Cor F 9
16 Aug
5308 Bower John
E 11
6 Aug
5452 Bently F
H 12
Aug
5464 Bently James Cav 1 I
12
2 Aug
4830 Blackman A, Cor Art
C 6
16 Sept
7742 Banning J F
E 3
Ballentine 16 Sept
8018
Robert A 6
12408 Bassett J B 11 Jan 65
B 6
Jan
12540 Bohine C 2E
27
Feb
12620 Bennis Charles 7K
8
16 July
3707 Chapin J L 64
A 21
7 July
3949 Cottrell P
C 25
11 July
3941 Clarkson
H 25
July
4367 Culler M 7E
31
18 Aug
4449 Connor D
F 1
16 Aug
4848 Carrier D B
D 6
1 Aug
6060 Cook W H Cav
G 18
16 Aug
6153 Clark H H
F 15
Aug
6846 Clark W 6A
25
10 Aug
5799 Champlain H
F 15
9 Apr
336 Cane John
H 2
Apr
620 Christian A M 1A
19
14 Apr
775 Crawford James
A 28
7316 Chapman M 16 Aug
E 30
Aug
7348 Cleary P Cav 1B
31
Aug
7395 Campbell Robert 7E
31
16 Aug
7418 Culler M
K 31
16 Sept
7685 Carver John G
B 3
14 Sept
7780 Cain Thomas
G 4
8 Sept
9984 Crossley B
G 29
16 Oct
10272 Coltier W
B 3
11 Oct
11175 Callahan J
I 19
Oct
11361 Candee D M Art 2A 64
23
Mar
25 Dowd F 7 I
8
Aug
7325 Davis W Cav 1L
30
10 July
2813 Davis W
E 3
July
3614 Damery John 6A
20
11 Sept
7597 Diebenthal H
C 2
Sept
8568 Donoway J Cav 1A
12
16 Sept
8769 Dutton W H
K 14
5446 Dugan Charles 16 Aug
K 12
16 Oct
11339 Dean R
H 23
16 Oct
11481 Demmings G A
I 24
18 Nov
11889 Downer S
C 7
16 Nov
11991 Demming B J
G 13
16 July
3482 Emmonds A
K 17
14 July
4437 Easterly Thomas
G 31
Aug
4558 Earnest H C 6 I
2
16 Aug
7346 Ensworth John
C 31
Edwards O J, 8 Sept
7603
Cor G 2
16 Sept
8368 Evans N L
I 10
16 Oct
11608 Emmett W
K 28
Jan
12442 Eaton W 6F 65
12
14 Mar
186 Fluit C W 64
G 27
6 May
1277 Francell Otto
C 22
7 June
2612 Fry S
D 28
4444 Fibbles H 16 Aug
G 1
Aug
4465 Fisher H 1E
1
Florence J J, 16 Aug
5123
Cor C 8
24 Aug
5382 Fuller H S
H 11
1 Aug
5913 Frisbie Levi Cav
G 17
Aug
5556 Fogg C S’t 7K
13
Sept
8028 Feely M 7 I
6
14 Sept
9089 Filby A
C 18
Oct
10255 Frederick John 7A
3
11 Nov
12188 Fagan P D
A 28
14 July
3028 Gordon John
G 7
9 July
4096 Gray Pat
H 27
July
4974 Grammon Jas Cav 1K
7
Gulterman J, July
4005 1E
Mus 26
16 Aug
5173 Gilmore J
C 9
16 Aug
7057 Gallagher P
D 28
18 Aug
7337 Gott G, Mus
- 30
7592 Goodrich J W 16 Sept
C 2
16 Sept
7646 Graigg W
B 3
11 Sept
9423 Guina H M
G 21
11 Oct
10300 Grady M
B 4
Oct
10397 Gladstone Wm 6K
6
Mar
49 Holt Thomas Cav 1A
15
14 June
2336 Hughes Ed
D 22
16 July
3195 Hitchcock Wm A
C 12
July
3448 Hall Wm G 1K
17
14 July
3559 Holcomb D
D 18
14 May
1350 Hilenthal Jas
C 25
16 July
3033 Haskins Jas
D 8
Aug
5029 Hollister A Cav 1L
8
16 Aug
5162 Hally Thomas
F 9
15 Aug
5352 Hanson F A
I 11
1 Aug
6695 Hodges Geo Cav
H 24
4937 Harwood G 15 Aug
A 7
17 Aug
6964 Hoyt E S
B 27
16 Aug
7012 Hull M
E 27
16 Aug
7380 Holcomb A A
E 31
16 Sept
7642 Haley W
D 3
16 Sept
7757 Hubbard H D
D 4
18 Sept
8043 Haywood
E 11
16 Sept
8613 Heath I, S’t
K 13
16 Sept
9129 Hall B
G 18
11 Sept
9369 Heart W
F 20
16 Sept
9981 Hurley R A 64
I 29
18 Nov
12086 Hibbard A
D 18
14 Nov
12117 Hancock W
G 22
11 Nov
12163 Hudson Chas
C 26
16 Nov
8148 Hubbard B
A 8
11 Sept
9340 Islay H
- 4
Jamieson 7 April
737
Charles D 26
5221 Johnson John 16 Aug
E 10
11 Aug
7083 Johnson G W
G 28
Jamison J S, Q 1 Aug
7365 Cav
MS - 31
16 Sept
7570 Jones Jno J
B 2
6 Sept
7961 Jones James R
G 6
1 Sept
8502 Johnson F
D 12
16 Nov
11970 Johnson C S
E 12
16 Dec
12340 Johnson W
E 26
14 June
1590 Kingsbury C
K 3
11 Aug
5186 Klineland L
C 9
8 Aug
6374 Kempton B F
G 21
6 Aug
6705 Kershoff B
H 25
14 Aug
6748 Kelley F
I 25
Sept
7749 Kaltry J Cav 1L
3
7 Sept
8065 Kimball H H
H 7
7 Sept
8866 Kohlenburg C
D 15
10233 Kearn T 16 Oct
A 2
16 July
3401 Lenden H
D 16
10 Aug
5893 Lastry J
I 16
Aug
5499 Lewis J 8E
12
14 Aug
6124 Leonard W
H 19
Lavanaugh W O, 16 Sept
7912
S’t C 5
8 Sept
7956 Linker C
G 6
7 Sept
9219 Lewis G H
G 19
Oct
10228 Lee, farrier Cav 1F
2
6 Mar
74 Mills W J
D 20
14 Mar
119 McCaulley Jas
D 20
14 June
2295 Miller Charles
I 21
16 July
3516 McCord P
G 18
14 July
3644 Miller A
D 19
11 July
3410 Mould James
E 16
15 Aug
3933 McGinnis J W
E 17
July
4079 Miller D Cav 1E
27
4417 Messenger A 16 July
G 31
11 Aug
4492 McLean Wm
F 1
8 Aug
4595 Marshalls B
H 3
16 Aug
5238 Mickallis F
F 10
16 Sept
7852 Miller F D
B
10 Sept
8150 Modger A
I 8
11 Aug
6902 Mape George
B 25
8 July
6240 Marshal L
H 20
1 Sept
7547 Moore A P, S’t Cav
H 2
16 Sept
8446 Mathews S J
K 11
1 Sept
8501 Myers L Cav
- 12
11 Sept
9170 Mertis C
C 18
14 Sept
9321 Milor W, S’t
F 20
16 Aug
5328 Miller H
A 11
16 Aug
6342 Malone John
B 22
Aug
6426 Messey M 7E
22
6451 McGee Thomas 11 Aug
D 22
Aug
6570 McDavid James 1K
23
11 Aug
6800 Meal John
D 25
14 Oct
10595 McCreieth A
H 10
7 Oct
10914 McKeon J
H 14
16 Oct
11487 Murphy W
C 26
11 Oct
11538 McDowell J
D 27
5 Nov
12134 Montjoy T
C 23
16 Aug
5044 Nichols C
G 8
7 Aug
6222 Northrop John
D 20
1 Aug
7331 North S S, S’t Cav
D 30
Oct
10895 Nichols M 7 I 64
14
Aug
4565 Orton H C 6 I
9
Sept
7511 Olena R Cav 1E
1
14 Sept
8276 Orr A
H 14
14 July
2960 Pendalton W
C 6
14 July
3808 Pompey C
B 24
4356 Parker S B 10 July
B 31
1 July
3803 Phelps S G
H 22
16 Aug
4934 Pimble A
I 7
11 Aug
5002 Plum James
G 8
Aug
5386 Patchey J Cav 1 I
12
16 Sept
7487 Post C, S’t
K 1
7 Sept
7688 Potache A
G 3
Sept
9248 Phillips J I 8B
19
Padfrey 8 Sept
9444
Sylvanus H 21
7 Sept
9533 Painter N P
C 22
Oct
10676 Puritan O Cav 1L
11
7 Oct
11616 Peir A
D 28
July
2804 Ruther J, S’t Cav 1E
3
2 July
2871 Reed H H Art
H 4
10 July
3674 Risley E, S’t
B 20
11 Aug
4636 Reins Wm
I 3
5902 Ross D 10 Aug