Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AFP Intelligence Community's Strategic Risk Management Process in Response To External Aggression
AFP Intelligence Community's Strategic Risk Management Process in Response To External Aggression
RODEN R. ORBON
[email protected]
Philippine Christian University
Manila, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/060599
ABSTRACT
In the ever-changing global security landscape, characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and
ambiguity (VUCA), this study serves as a capstone project to provide valuable insights to the AFP
Intelligence Community (AFPIC). Its primary focus is to effectively tackle the exceptional non-military
security threats a foreign adversary poses. China's rapid and significant ascent as an Asian hegemon and
a global superpower has driven its pursuit of resources and influence worldwide. These hegemonic actions
have elicited resentment from smaller and weaker nations adversely affected by them and drawn the ire
of the United States and its allies. The Philippines, strategically located in the South China Sea and the
Pacific region, has become a prime target of China's unconventional warfare strategy, where they seek to
subdue their adversaries without resorting to kinetic force. China's United Front Works (UFW) strategy is
a crucial element of its hybrid warfare approach, providing a platform for intelligence, influence, and
interference operations designed to systematically undermine its enemies. This study aims to describe the
current state of the AFPIC's risk management capabilities in terms of doctrines, organization, and training
concerning the security threats posed by China's UFW. It also seeks to identify the challenges in these
areas and propose appropriate solutions to address them. Overall, the objective of this study is to
contribute to the long-term endeavor of enhancing the AFPIC's doctrines, organization, and training to
address the threats posed by China's UFW and other hybrid security threats effectively. The qualitative
data gathered through document analysis, key informant interviews, and focused group discussions
involving multiple participants from various units and offices within the AFPIC and the AFP Triad, as well
as education and doctrine development circles, underwent an iterative and hybrid process of thematic and
content analysis. Tools such as SWOT, TOWS, and the causal-impact analytical tool were utilized during
this analytical process. The results of this analysis provided valuable insights into the current state of
AFPIC's risk management capability in terms of doctrine, organization, and training, highlighting both the
advantages and disadvantages within these areas. Further exploration revealed the primary challenges
present in these three domains, which encompassed internal and external dynamics that hindered the
optimal implementation of related initiatives. Subsequently, numerous recommendations were formulated
to enhance the AFPIC's doctrine, organization, and training capabilities in response to the exceptional
security threats posed by China's united front works. Central to the research findings were three crucial
factors that influenced the success or failure of the doctrinal, organizational, and training endeavors: the
support of advocates and champions, the role of knowledge management, and the significance of engaging
foreign stakeholders.
Keywords: China’s United Front Works; influence and interference operations; intelligence operations; AFP
Intelligence Community; hybrid security threats
1) Avoiding 4) Transferring
a. Diplomatic engagements: Engage in a. International cooperation: Foster
diplomatic talks and negotiations to avoid potential cooperation with other countries, regional
conflicts and reduce tensions related to territorial organizations, and international institutions to
disputes or other security concerns. collectively address security risks posed by China
through information sharing, joint exercises, and
b. Diversifying dependencies: Reduce
collaborative initiatives.
reliance on China by diversifying economic, trade,