Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reorientation of Health Service Governance Toward The Fulfillment of Social Justice
Reorientation of Health Service Governance Toward The Fulfillment of Social Justice
ABSTRACT: Health insurance is a human right. At the practical level, this health insurance program in
Indonesia is organized by BPJS Kesehatan (Social Security Administering Body for Health). The
implementation of BPJS Kesehatan is still not optimal and effective. Three problems are discussed in this
writing: the dynamics of health insurance governance in Indonesia, the implementation of the fulfillment of the
right to health by BPJS Kesehatan, and the reorientation of BPJS Kesehatan services toward social justice.
These problems are then answered by scientific research methods using a sociological juridical approach.
Complaintsoften occur regarding the regulations, the services provided by the health facility providers, and the
distance between the community and the health facilities. Such complaints affect the public interest in becoming
BPJS Kesehatan participants. The aforementioned conditions must be considered and evaluated for the
government's success in the aspired national health insurance plan.
KEYWORDS -BPJS Kesehatan, Health Insurance, Social Justice
I. INTRODUCTION
Health is one of the community's basic rights that the government must guarantee. As early as 1948, the
World Health Organization (WHO) described health as “a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-
being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”[1]. The obligation of the state to ensure public health
has been mandated in Article 28 H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. In that article, it is stated that
"everyone has the right to live in physical and spiritual prosperity, to have a place to live, and to have a good
and healthy living environment. and have the right to obtain health services. Law No. 36 of 2009 describes that
health is a condition where humans are physically, mentally, spiritually, and socially healthy to be economically
able to live a productive life [2].
The human right to health is a critical legal tool to achieve health justice, and universal health coverage
is included among the Sustainable Development Goals [3]. Therefore, people at all levels of the economy must
enjoy the right to health. As a proportion of the Indonesian people is still on the verge of the poverty line;
therefore, to help the community and reduce the burden on the community in bearing the high health costs, a
system that can use the concept of gotong royong (mutual assistance) is needed to reduce the burden on the
community in bearing the high health costs. Therefore, hopefully,no more people cannot enjoy health facilities
because of financial disadvantages.
The government is legally responsible for creating a good quality health service system. Health
insurance has an important role and function in supporting the life of the nation and state. As part of its
responsibilities, the government has made efforts to design health insurance programs that can meet the
community’s basic needs Health insurance programs that have been run by the government such as Jamkesmas,
Jamkesda, ASKES, and the latest public health program are the government programs called the Social Security
Administering Body (BPJS) [4]. The legal rules regarding BPJS are regulated in Law Number 24 of 2011
concerning BPJS. The government formed BPJS in two social security administration bodies, namely BPJS
Kesehatan and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan (employment). BPJS Kesehatan is a State-Owned Enterprise (BUMN)
specifically tasked with administering health insurance for all Indonesian people [5]. The health insurance
program organized by the government is implemented by PT Askes (Persero) and PT. Jamsostek (Persero). This
program is applied to civil servants, private employees, veterans, and retired recipients. Meanwhile, the general
public can use other insurance programs such as Jamkesmas (Community Health Insurance) and Jamkesda
(Regional Health Insurance), especially for the poor and underprivileged. However, based on the Regulation of
the Minister of Health Number 28 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of National Health
Insurance, the social security program has not run effectively and efficiently, causing the cost and quality of
II. DISCUSSION
1. Dynamics of Health Insurance Governance in Indonesia
Each country defines the conditions for realizing the right to health care to guarantee people’s health.
The state itself assumes the controller's obligations and protects this right [13]. In carrying out the legal
obligations to provide health to the public, the government prepares a health insurance program for the entire
community. The health insurance program for the community in Indonesia has existed since the Dutch colonial
era. During the Dutch government era, health insurance was only given to government employees and family
members of government employees. After Indonesian independence and the end of the Dutch colonial
government, the Indonesian state government fully held the government. Regarding health insurance, it was still
maintained with the issuance of Minister of Health Regulation No. 1 of 1968 by establishing an agency tasked
with administering health for state employees and retirees. The agency is the Health Maintenance Fund
III. CONCLUSION
As a state administrator, the government must provide health insurance to its citizens; therefore, the
Indonesian government regulates health insurance for the community by forming an agency to carry out this
task, BPJS. BPJS consists of two main parts of the program: BPJS Kesehatan and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. BPJS
Kesehatan is tasked with making sure that the poor or underprivileged groups are the target recipients of health
insurance assistance from the government, as well as managing people from non-poor or general groups who
use health insurance services provided by the government. In connection with this goal, of course, it does not
necessarily solve the problems that arise in the community where two main problems arise in the BPJS
Kesehatan, namely: problems regarding the effectiveness of the implementation of BPJS Kesehatan, where
many people still complain about the effectiveness of BPJS Kesehatan services related to the health insurance.
Moreover, there are differences in the services provided by health facilities to patients who use BPJS Kesehatan
with general patients or those who use private commercial insurance. Such problems will influence the
community's interest in becoming BPJS Kesehatan participants. The level of service that does not match
expectations and the obstacles faced by BPJS Kesehatan patients become a benchmark for public interest in
becoming BPJS Kesehatan participants.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to thank the Faculty of Law, Universitas Ngurah Rai, and all parts included in this
research. Sincere gratitude also goes to anonymous reviewers and editors who have provided constructive
feedback to make this manuscript worth reading and citing.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Shafique et al., Right to health and social justice in Bangladesh: Ethical dilemmas and obligations of
state and non-state actors to ensure health for urban poor, BMC Medical Ethics,19(46), 2018, 61-69.
[2] Z. Asyhadie, Aspek hukum kesehatan di Indonesia (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017).
[3] L. Montel et al.,How should implementation of the human right to health be assessed? A scoping review
of the public health literature from 2000 to 2021, International Journal for Equity in Health,21(139),
2022, 1-12.
[4] B.Setiyono, Perlunya revitalisasi kebijakan jaminan kesehatan di Indonesia, Politika: Jurnal Ilmu
Politik,9(2),2018, 38-60.
[5] N. W.Sayekti and Y. Sudarwati, Analisis terhadap badan penyelenggara jaminan sosial (BPJS):
Transformasi pada bumn penyelenggara jaminan sosial,Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik,1(1),2010,
1-24.
[6] D.Rahma et al., Analisis faktor dan tingkat kepuasan peserta pada jaminan kesehatan nasional di
Indonesia,Humantech: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia,1(8), 2022,1038-1045.
[7] A.Abbas and K. T. Lodan, Peran pengawasan ombudsman dalam penyelenggaraan pelayanan
publik,Dialektika Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Negara Universitas Putera Batam,5(1), 2020,17-23.
[8] G.Putro and I. Barida, Manajemen peningkatan kepesertaan dalam jaminan kesehatan nasional pada
kelompok nelayan non penerima bantuan iuran (non pbi), Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan
Kesehatan,27(1),2017, 17-24.