Bradicardia y Fluoracilo Señal
Bradicardia y Fluoracilo Señal
WHO Pharmaceuticals
NEWSLETTER No. 5
Signal
WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 5, 2020
Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO
licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the
work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any
specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must
license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should
add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health
Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall
be the binding and authentic edition”.
Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the
World Intellectual Property Organization. (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules/)
Suggested citation. WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 5, 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence:
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris.
Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for
commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.
Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or
images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the
copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely
with the user.
General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the
expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or
of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent
approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or
recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the
names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the
published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the
interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall WHO be liable for damages arising from its use.
Table of Contents
Regulatory Matters
Alfuzosin ............................................................................................................... 4
Baricitinib .............................................................................................................. 4
Benidipine ............................................................................................................. 4
Canagliflozin ......................................................................................................... 4
Hydroxychloroquine .............................................................................................. 5
Opioid ................................................................................................................... 5
Pentoxifylline ......................................................................................................... 5
Piperacillin, Tazobactam ....................................................................................... 5
Relugolix ............................................................................................................... 5
Tinidazole ............................................................................................................. 6
Ulipristal acetate ................................................................................................... 6
X-ray contrast media ............................................................................................. 6
Safety of medicines
Allopurinol ............................................................................................................. 7
Beta-lactam antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intravenous iron
preparations and rocuronium ................................................................................. 7
Clozapine, other antipsychotics ............................................................................. 7
Cyproterone .......................................................................................................... 8
Denosumab ........................................................................................................... 8
Emollient ............................................................................................................... 8
Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (combination) .................................................................. 8
Isotretinoin ............................................................................................................ 9
Topiramate ............................................................................................................ 9
Information Note
Sodium valproate ................................................................................................ 10
Signal
Everolimus and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) ................................................... 11
Fluorouracil and Bradycardia – national signal from Peru with potential global
relevance ............................................................................................................ 18
to include the risk of severe strong causal relationship No.3, 2020: Licence suspension due to liver
abnormal uterine bleeding in between tinidazole use and injury in UK; No.1, 2020: Risk of hepatic
patients with submucosal skin hyperpigmentation. injury in EU; No.5, 2018: New measures to
minimize risk of liver injury in EU and
fibroid in the careful
Reference: Canada)
administration section.
Based on the communication
Relugolix is indicated for relief from NCC-PvPI, IPC India
of menorrhagia, lower (ipc.gov.in)
abdominal pain, lumbar pain
and anaemia associated with X-ray contrast media
uterine fibroids.
Risk of contrast-induced
A total of 13 cases of severe Ulipristal acetate encephalopathy
abnormal uterine bleeding
were reported in patients using Revocation of marketing Japan. The MHLW and the
relugolix in Japan during the PMDA have announced that the
authorizations
previous three years. For 10 of package inserts for X-ray
the 13 cases, a causal
recommended
contrast media including
relationship between the drug Europe. The European iopamidol (Iopamiron®),
and event was reasonably Medicines Agency (EMA) has iohexol (Omnipaque®) and
possible. No patient mortalities announced that the meglumine iotroxate
have been reported. Pharmacovigilance Risk (Biliscopin®) should be revised
Patients should be carefully Assessment Committee (PRAC) to include contrast-induced
monitored and if any has recommended the encephalopathy as an adverse
abnormalities are observed, revocation of the marketing drug reaction.
appropriate measures should authorizations for ulipristal X-ray contrast media is
be taken. Patients should be acetate preparations (Esmya® indicated for several methods
instructed to immediately and generic medicines) when such as arteriography by digital
contact a medical institution if used to treat symptoms of X-ray method, computer-
they experience heavy bleeding uterine fibroids, due to the risk assisted tomography and
at one time. of liver injury. intravenous urography.
Reference: Ulipristal acetate is indicated A total of 11 cases of contrast-
Revision of Precautions, for the treatment of moderate induced encephalopathy in
MHLW/PMDA, 8 September to severe symptoms of uterine patients exposed to X-ray
2020 (www.pmda.go.jp/english/) fibroids in women who have contrast media have been
not reached the menopause. reported in Japan during the
Ulipristal acetate is also used previous three years, including
as a single-dose medicine for five cases for which a causal
emergency contraception. The relationship between the drug
Tinidazole recommendation does not and event was reasonably
apply for use of ulipristal as a possible.
Risk of skin contraception.
hyperpigmentation The MHLW and PMDA have
The PRAC considered all the concluded that a revision of the
available evidence including package inserts was necessary.
India. The NCC-PvPI has made
cases of serious liver injury.
a recommendation to the
Because it was not possible to Reference:
CDSCO to request that the PIL
identify which patients were Revision of Precautions,
for tinidazole is revised to
most at risk or measures that MHLW/PMDA, 20 July 2020
incorporate skin
could reduce the risk, the PRAC (www.pmda.go.jp/english/)
hyperpigmentation as a
concluded that the risks of the
clinically significant adverse
medicines outweighed the
drug reaction.
benefits and that they should
Tinidazole is used for the not be marketed in the EU.
treatment of amoebiasis and
The PRAC recommendation will
giardiasis in adult patients only
now be forwarded to EMA’s
and in the treatment of
Committee for Medicinal
anaerobic infections.
Products for Human Use
Between July 2011 and (CHMP), which will adopt the
November 2019, the NCC-PvPI EMA’s opinion.
received a total of 13 ICSRs of
Reference:
tinidazole associated skin
EMA, 4 September 2020
hyperpigmentation. The cases
(www.ema.europa.eu)
were evaluated by the SRP,
PvPI, and IPC who found a (See also WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter
liver function associated with dysfunction during treatment Topiramate is indicated to treat
DAA treatment, which and persistence of these epilepsy and to prevent
sometimes led to liver failure adverse effects for some time migraines.
and death. after discontinuation.
The CARM received a report of
The Medicines Adverse Depression, anxiety and patient who experienced pre-
Reactions Committee (MARC) psychotic symptoms, including seizure symptoms after
reviewed the risk of serious suicidal thoughts/attempts and changing brands of topiramate.
liver injury in patients taking suicide, have been reported in The Medsafe recommends
the drug to determine the patients treated with prescribers follow the MHRA’s
impact for New Zealand isotretinoin. All patients taking advice on switching brands of
prescribers and patients. isotretinoin should be antiepileptic medicines. Brand
monitored for signs of switches for topiramate must
Before starting treatment, the
depression by the prescriber be carefully considered, taking
patient’s liver function should
and referred for appropriate into consideration factors such
be assessed. The drug can be
treatment if necessary. Also, it as seizure frequency and
used in patients with mild liver
is important to remember that treatment history.
impairment, but is not
psychiatric symptoms may not
recommended in patients with Reference:
be fully alleviated after
moderate liver impairment and Prescriber Update, Medsafe,
discontinuation.
is contraindicated in patients September 2020
with severe liver impairment. Isotretinoin has also been (www.medsafe.govt.nz/)
associated with reports of
The CARM has not received any
sexual dysfunction,
reports of liver-related adverse
predominantly involving
reactions in association with
erectile dysfunction, decreased
Maviret®.
libido and vaginal dryness,
Reference: although they are currently
Prescriber Update, Medsafe, thought to be rare.
September 2020
Additionally, isotretinoin is a
(www.medsafe.govt.nz/)
powerful teratogen associated
(See also WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter with a high frequency of severe
No.2, 2019: Risk of hepatic impairment and and life-threatening birth
jaundice in Japan) defects if there is exposure in
utero. It is contraindicated in
women of childbearing
potential unless all the
conditions of the Pregnancy
Isotretinoin Prevention Programme are
met.
Risk of psychiatric reactions
and sexual dysfunction Reference:
Drug Safety Update, MHRA,
United Kingdom. The 26 August 2020
MHRA has reminded health- (www.gov.uk/mhra)
care professionals that (See also WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter
isotretinoin (Roaccutane®, No.5, 2018: Risk of obsessive compulsive
Reticutan® and Rizuderm®) disorder (OCD) in New Zealand; No.5, 2016:
should only be used to treat Potential risk of psychiatric adverse events
severe forms of acne that is in Australia; No.1, 2015: Possible risk of
resistant to adequate courses psychiatric disorders in UK)
of standard therapy due to the
risk of teratogenic effects,
potential psychiatric reactions
and sexual dysfunction.
Topiramate
Isotretinoin is indicated for
severe acne that is resistant to Brand change should be
adequate courses of standard avoided
antibacterial or topical therapy.
New Zealand. The Medsafe
The MHRA regularly reviews
has reminded health-care
the safety of isotretinoin, with
professionals that changing
the aim of examining the
brands of topiramate should be
available evidence for the
avoided.
possible risks of psychiatric
adverse reactions and sexual
WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 5, 2020 • 9
Information Note
Sodium valproate
The WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 5, 2019, provided some information on sodium valproate. Additional
information is provided below, outlining actions proposed by WHO.
Medicines containing valproate (e.g. sodium valproate, valproic acid, divalproex) should be avoided in
pregnant women or in females of child-bearing potential, unless alternative treatments are ineffective or not
tolerated, because of the high risk of birth defects (such as spina bifida, facial, skull, limb and heart
malformations) and developmental disorders in infants who are exposed to valproate in the womb. When
alternative treatments are not available or appropriate, female patients prescribed valproate medicines
should be made aware of the risk and use effective contraception methods.
Valproic acid (sodium valproate) is included on the WHO Model Lists of Essential Medicines for the treatment
of epilepsy in adults and children, and of bipolar disorder in adults.
In 2021, the listings for valproic acid on the Model Lists will be revised to include a cautionary note to better
highlight the safety risks associated with use in pregnant women and females of child-bearing potential.
WHO will be updating its current guidelines on epilepsy management in 2021. As part of this process, the
evidence review on question on “Management of epilepsy in women of child bearing age”, will be updated to
inform the revised recommendation on the role of pharmacological interventions, including valproate and
other antiseizure medicines.
A signal is defined by WHO as reported information on a possible causal relationship between an adverse event and a drug, the
relationship being unknown or incompletely documented previously. Usually more than a single report is required to generate a signal,
depending upon the seriousness of the event and the quality of the information. A signal is a hypothesis together with data and arguments
and it is important to note that a signal is not only uncertain but also preliminary in nature.
The signals in this Newsletter are based on information derived from reports of suspected adverse drug reactions available in the WHO
global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), VigiBase. The database contains over 23 million reports of suspected adverse
drug reactions, submitted by National Pharmacovigilance Centres participating in the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring.
VigiBase is, on behalf of the WHO, maintained by the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) and periodic analysis of VigiBase data is
performed in accordance with UMC’s current routine signal detection process. International pharmaceutical companies, when identified as
uniquely responsible for the drug concerned, are invited to comment on the signal text. Signals are thereafter communicated to National
Pharmacovigilance Centres, before being published in this Newsletter. Signal texts from UMC might be edited to some extent by WHO and
may differ from the original version. More information regarding the ICSRs, their limitations and proper use, is provided in the UMC Caveat
document available at the end of Signal (page 24). For information on the UMC Measures of Disproportionate reporting please refer to
WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter Issue No. 1, 2012.
UMC, a WHO Collaborating Centre, is an independent foundation and a centre for international service and scientific research within the
field of pharmacovigilance. For more information, on the UMC Measures of Disproportionate Reporting etc., visit www.who-umc.org. To
leave a comment regarding the signals in this Newsletter, please contact: the Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Box 1051, SE-751 40 Uppsala,
Sweden. E-mail: [email protected].
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is characterised as exemestane (54 cases), zoledronic acid (54),
oral lesions of exposed necrotic bone that persist for denosumab (38), capecitabine (11) and fulvestrant
at least eight weeks, with no previous history of (11). Zoledronic acid and denosumab are both
radiation or metastasis to the area. This oral known to cause ONJ. Exemestane is a potent
condition is rare but potentially serious and very oestrogen lowering agent, and a reduction in bone
painful. A number of drugs are known to cause ONJ mineral density and an increased fracture rate has
but it can also occur spontaneously.3 The condition been observed. Fulvestrant is an oestrogen receptor
was first described in 2003, in a case report antagonist and may also cause osteoporosis, but
including 36 patients who had been treated with there is no long-term data on the effects on bone.
two different bisphosphonates,4 and was later Most co-reported reactions were malignant
determined to be a drug class effect. In the neoplasm progression (13 cases), stomatitis (12),
following years, other drugs were also associated fatigue (11), pain (10) and metastasis to bone (9).
with the development of ONJ, such as the Stomatitis and metastasis to the bone (if located in
monoclonal antibodies denosumab and the jaw) may have contributed to the ONJ.
bevacizumab and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor
The vast majority of the patients were administered
sunitinib. More recently the mTOR inhibitor
everolimus due to breast cancer (73 cases) or renal
everolimus has also been implicated as a risk factor
cancer (28 cases), and the dose varied between 5
for ONJ.5 Hence the term ‘Medication Related
and 20 mg per day, with 10 mg being the most
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw’ (MRONJ) was established
common daily dose. Most cases had a reasonable
in 2009 by the American Association of Oral and
time to onset, with a median of 31 weeks, which is
Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS).3 In addition to the
shorter than the median time to onset for
use of antiresorptive and antiangiogenic agents,
bisphosphonate-related ONJ (108 weeks) but longer
several other risk factors for ONJ have been
than the median time to onset for non-
identified. These include dental surgery (e.g. tooth
antiresorptive medications (20 weeks).11, 12 In 15
extraction), poor oral health, diabetes, smoking,
cases the reaction abated when the drug was
and concomitant use of steroids.6, 7
withdrawn.
The combination of antiangiogenics and
Since several other drugs are known to cause ONJ,
antiresorptives is known to increase the risk of ONJ
all cases with drugs that have ONJ labelled were
development,8, 9 but little is known about the risk of
excluded from the case series. This resulted in 27
developing ONJ with antiangiogenics alone.
remaining cases, but some of them could also be
excluded since the narratives revealed that the
patients had taken other ONJ-causing drugs. Some
Reports in VigiBase
cases had a medical history that may have
During a UMC signal detection sprint held in contributed to the development of ONJ, e.g.
December 2018, the MedDRA preferred term stomatitis, dental issues or bone metastasis.
‘osteonecrosis of jaw’ was highlighted for the drug
A selection of reports is presented in Table 1. Case
everolimus in VigiBase, the WHO global database of
1 concerns a female patient with metastatic breast
individual case safety reports (ICSRs).
cancer who developed ONJ five weeks after
As of 3 February 2020, there were 117 reports for initiating everolimus (and exemestane) treatment.
this drug–adverse drug reaction (ADR) combination Both drugs were withdrawn and the patient was
in VigiBase. Based on the overall reporting of recovering when the report was sent. According to a
adverse reactions for everolimus, and of the later publication of this case, the patient had no
adverse reaction ONJ in VigiBase, the expected relevant past dental history and metastasis was
value for the number of reports on the combination ruled out. The patient was treated with
was 35, and the association was highlighted as cephalosporin for two weeks and after two months
disproportionally reported, by IC analysis10. her condition had improved.13
The reports came from 15 countries across four In case 2, a female patient received everolimus for
continents: Europe (76 reports), the Americas (16), advanced breast cancer and after nine days
Asia (23), and Australia (1). More female than male experienced a range of adverse reactions including
patients were affected (75% women), since the aphthae, throat pain and difficulty swallowing. She
most common indication for everolimus in the case was also diagnosed with ONJ and had no relevant
series was breast cancer, and the age range was medical history or concomitant medication.
29-82 years, with a median of 64 years. Physicians Everolimus treatment was continued and most of
and other health professionals accounted for 95% the adverse reactions persisted, except for the
of the reports and the rest were submitted by aphthae which resolved after laser therapy. The
pharmacists and consumers/non-health time to onset was very short in this case, but not
professionals. More than 90% of the cases were implausible.12 The reporter assessed the events as
serious, including six fatalities (5%), but all were suspected to be related to the drug.
not caused by the ONJ.
Case 3 describes a female patient with metastatic
In 18 cases, everolimus was the only reported drug, breast cancer who received everolimus for 19 days
and in 26 cases it was the only suspected drug. The and then stopped the drug for one month due to a
most frequently co-reported drugs were tooth extraction. The treatment was then resumed
but again stopped after only two days due to ONJ recovering after the drug had been withdrawn. The
onset. The reporter suspected the drug to have patient had no related medical history nor past drug
caused the adverse reaction since the patient had therapy.
recovered substantially two weeks after drug
Case 5 presents a female patient of unknown age
withdrawal. However, tooth extraction is also a
who developed ONJ during treatment with
trigger event for ONJ.
everolimus for advanced breast cancer. The time to
Case 4 concerns a female patient with recurrent onset is unknown, but the drug was withdrawn and
breast cancer, treated with everolimus and a few the stomatitis resolved; the outcome of the ONJ
other drugs (see Table 1) who developed ONJ. The was unknown.
time to onset is unknown but the patient was
There are also case reports where the other mTOR extractions. There are a few case reports of ONJ in
inhibitor temsirolimus has been combined with patients who neither taken other suspected drugs
denosumab or bevacizumab, resulting in ONJ, and nor had any known risk factors. Based on current
the authors describe a potential synergistic effect.21, data, the risk of ONJ due to everolimus treatment
22 alone, seems very low. However, combined with
other drugs with the potential to cause ONJ and risk
Furthermore, US FDA reviewed all ONJ cases in
factors such as diabetes or dental surgery,
FAERS on the drugs suspected to cause ONJ. This
everolimus may act as a trigger. Although it is
study was the first to show that the mTOR inhibitors
impossible to conclude what role everolimus played
everolimus and temsirolimus were also associated
in each reported case, VigiBase data and published
with the risk for ONJ, with 84 and 28 cases
case reports still point to a potential causal
respectively. However, compared to other drugs,
association where the drug may at least have
the risk of mTOR induced ONJ was low (<5%).23
contributed to the development of ONJ. Further
The exact pathophysiology of ONJ has still not been studies in this area are required considering the
fully understood but several theories have been increasing population of patients at risk of ONJ, the
proposed and the mechanism is likely to be multi- seriousness of this condition, and the adverse
factorial. Factors that may cause ONJ are: bone impact on the quality of life for those affected.
remodelling (osteoclast) inhibition, bone Close collaboration between medical doctors and
infection/inflammation, angiogenesis inhibition, soft dentists, as well as information to patients at risk,
tissue toxicity, and immunity dysfunction.24 In are important aspects for the prevention, prompt
relation to everolimus, pre-clinical studies have recognition and treatment of ONJ.27
shown that inhibition of mTOR decreases the
maturation of osteoclasts and increases their
apoptosis, which may explain how osteonecrosis References
may occur.1 Furthermore, when VEGF activity is
1. Indo Y, Takeshita S, Ishii KA, Hoshii T, Aburatani
inhibited, the healing of bone is impaired6. The
H, Hirao A, et al. Metabolic Regulation of
immunosuppression caused by everolimus explains
Osteoclast Differentiation and Function. J Bone
the impaired wound healing and the infection
Miner Res. 2013;28(11):2392-9.
susceptibility of treated patients. However, although
infection and inflammation are often present when 2. Cobbold SP. The mTOR Pathway and Integrating
ONJ is diagnosed, it has not been established Immune Regulation. Immunology.
whether infection precedes or follows necrosis.25 2013;140(4):391-8.
The wide range of time to onset of ONJ can be 3. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R,
explained by several factors, for example the Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, et al. American
potency, route of administration, and cumulative Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
dose of the drug used.26 One study showed that Position Paper on Medication-Related
ONJ caused by non-antiresorptive medications had Osteonecrosis of the jaw-2014 Update. J Oral
an earlier time to onset, a higher proportion of Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(10):1938-56.
cases lacking a trigger event, and greater likelihood
of healing and shorter healing time, compared to 4. Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and Zoledronate
ONJ caused by bone targeting agents, and the (Zometa) Induced Avascular Necrosis of the
diagnosis of ONJ is often delayed.12 There is a risk Jaws: A Growing Epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac
of underdiagnosis of ONJ due to lack of awareness, Surg. 2003;61(9):1115-7.
strict diagnostic criteria, and the fact that early 5. Gnant M, Baselga J, Rugo HS, Noguchi S, Burris
signs and symptoms of the condition are similar to HA, Piccart M, et al. Effect of Everolimus on
the clinical presentation of stomatitis, which is a Bone Marker Levels and Progressive Disease in
very common side effect of everolimus and most Bone in BOLERO-2. J Natl Cancer Inst.
other drugs that may also cause ONJ.6 This means 2013;105(9):654-63.
that there is probably under-reporting of ONJ; one
study concluded that the occurrence of ONJ in renal 6. Fusco V, Santini D, Armento G, Tonini G, Campisi
cancer patients receiving bisphosphonates and G. Osteonecrosis of jaw Beyond Antiresorptive
targeted agents might be underestimated.8 (Bone-Targeted) Agents: New Horizons in
Oncology. Expert Opin Drug Saf.
2016;15(7):925-35.
Discussion and conclusion 7. Chiu CT, Chiang WF, Chuang CY, Chang SW.
Among the cases in VigiBase, the vast majority Resolution of Oral Bisphosphonate and Steroid-
concerned patients with concurrent or past therapy Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw-A Serial Case
with drugs known (or suspected) to cause ONJ, Analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
which makes it difficult to identify the offending 2010;68(5):1055-63.
drug. Furthermore, exemestane and fulvestrant 8. Fusco V, Porta C, Saia G, Paglino C, Bettini G,
(often co-administered with everolimus), may also Scoletta M, et al. Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in
play a part in the development of ONJ considering Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer
their mechanism of action. Some patients also had Treated With Bisphosphonates and Targeted
potential risk factors such as diabetes and tooth
WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 5, 2020 • 14
Signal
Case Reporter Age /sex Suspected drugs Dose Action taken PT TTO
(days)
1 non-HCP/SR 65/M Everolimus UKN UKN Osteonecrosis of NR
Mycophenolate jaw
Mofetil,
Prednisolone
2 HCP/SR 67/F Afinitor UKN Treatment Osteonecrosis of 44
Discontinued jaw
3 HCP/PMS 35/F Everolimus, UKN Treatment Osteonecrosis of 394
Zoledronic Acid Discontinued jaw
4 HCP/Lit 67/F Paclitaxel, 2.5 mg UKN Osteonecrosis of NR
Carboplatin, jaw
Zoledronic Acid
Everolimus
5 HCP/PMS 52/M Everolimus 5 mg NR Necrosis NR
Lenvatinib
6 HCP/PMS 64/M Pazopanib 10mg , Treatment Osteonecrosis of 1669
Nivolumab 5 mg Discontinued jaw
Lenvatinib
Zoledronic Acid
Everolimus
7 HCP/Lit 46/F Zoledronic Acid UKN NR Osteonecrosis of 455
Everolimus, jaw
Exemestane
8 non-HCP/SR 60/F Everolimus 5mg NR Osteonecrosis of NR
Lenvatinib jaw
HCP= Health Care Professional; Lit= Literature, SR=Spontaneous Report, PMS= Post marketing surveillance, PT=Preferred
Term, NR=Not reported, UNK= unknown; TTO=Time to onset
Of the eight cases, two were non-HCP and one was not be established. The review of the new cases is
necrosis of unknown location. Four cases were consistent with the conclusion presented in previous
confounded by use of bisphosphonates. Anti- PSURs. Novartis will continue to monitor ONJ cases
angiogenic agent lenvatinib was a co-suspected in subsequent PSURs.
medication in three cases. Furthermore the cases
lacked sufficient information for a meaningful
medical assessment. None of the eight cases met 2.1.1.2 Empirica Signal
noteworthy criteria and hence a causal role could
The EB05 (lower bound of the 90% confidence everolimus, Empirica Signal and Novartis Global
interval for the EBGM (Empiric Bayes Geometric Safety Database search for ONJ was performed,
Mean) score was less than one. with a cut-off date of 31 Mar 2020, in transplant
patients treated with everolimus by using the
2.2 Everolimus indicated for prophylaxis of
MedDRA version 22.1 with the PT Osteonecrosis of
rejection of transplanted organs
jaw.
2.2.1 Methodology
2.2.1.1 Empirica Signal
In order to assess the association between ONJ and
2.2.1.2 Novartis Global Safety Database clinical trial or spontaneous reporting cases were
retrieved.
The search retrieved three LT cases for ONJ. No
In above indicated cases, there is limited a causal association of everolimus to the event of
information regarding TTO, as well as alternative ONJ could not be established.
explanations such as concomitant suspected drugs
and/or risk factors (prednisolone in all three cases,
rituximab in the first case (1), teeth extractions 3 References (available on request)
history in the second case (2), and history of teeth
extractions and parathyroidectomy in the third case 1. Keribin P. Guerrot D, Jardin F. Osteonecrosis of
(3)), therefore, a causal association could not be the Jaw in a Patient Presenting With Post-
established. Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder
Treated With Rituximab: A Case Report.
Up to date, there is no confirmed clinical evidence American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial
of an effect of ONJ with everolimus (indicated for Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg -:1-7, 2017
prophylaxis of rejection of transplanted organs)
alone. 2. Akkach S, et al. Everolimus-induced
osteonecrosis of the jaw in the absence of
Discussion and Conclusion bisphosphonates: a case report. Br J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2019
Everolimus has been marketed for more than 10
years worldwide. The cumulative post-marketing 3. Law M, Walker R, Basu G. Everolimus associated
patient exposure in oncology setting is over osteonecrosis of the jaw in kidney transplant
208,393 PTY, in TSC is over 23,522 PTY and in recipient. Kidney International Reports (2019) 4,
Transplant setting is over 638,081 PTY. Based on S1-S437
analysis of years of clinical and post-marketing data
defined as a frequency of less than 60 beats per identified in a signal detection workshop focussing
minute.4 on Latin American data in VigiBase, carried out in
May 2019. It was detected using disproportionality
analysis where the expected number of cases in
Peru was calculated to be 0.3 while the number
observed was 13 (IC025: 3.2). The data referred to
3. VigiBase reports in Table 1 includes the characteristics of all the 13
The combination of bradycardia and fluorouracil was Peruvian reports which formed the basis of the
signal analysis.
Table 1 includes four reports (1, 2, 3 and 4) that docetaxel, neither of which give bradycardia as an
give fluorouracil as the only administered drug; the acknowledged adverse drug reaction.10,11,12,13,14,15
diagnoses for which fluorouracil was administered One of the four reports described the concomitant
were in these cases colon adenocarcinoma, colon administration of ondansetron, and development of
cancer and gastric cancer. bradycardia as an infrequent adverse reaction.16,17
The information shown in the reports indicates that
Some of the other cases mention concomitantly
administration of fluorouracil and its concomitants
used drugs which potentially could have caused or
(oxaliplatin, ondansetron) was on the same day,
contributed to the event: Four other reports
but not specifying a more detailed time for each one
describe the concomitant administration of
in relation to the event.
oxaliplatin, a drug with the capacity to cause
adverse cardiac effects.5,6,7,8,9 In the case of Four reports included the administration of cisplatin,
oxaliplatin the development of bradycardia which in its labelling has bradycardia as an adverse
associated with overdose is noted in the prescribing reaction,18 and in two of these, docetaxel was also
information.8,9 One of the four reports (Case 5) administered. In three of the four reports
described concomitant administration of calcium fluorouracil and the concomitant drugs were
folinate, and two other (11 and 12) included administered on the same day, but the exact hour
WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 5, 2020 • 19
Signal
of administration of each drug is not specified. In findings. In three cases (1, 3 and 11) the level of
two of the four reports the bradycardia occurred on bradycardia ranged between 40 and 54 beats per
the same day that administration of fluorouracil and minute. No cases reported additional symptoms of
the concomitant drugs was started; equally, in the the bradycardia and only three cases (7, 8 and 11)
other two reports the bradycardia started three gave any additional adverse drug reaction:
days after administration of fluorouracil began. In headache, hypertension and peripheral neuropathy.
addition, in these four cases fluorouracil was the
Five of the Peruvian reports (Cases 6, 7, 8, 12 and
only drug reported as suspected.
13) came from the same doctor while each of the
Case 13 in Table 1 had concomitant administration others came from a different reporter.
of irinotecan and fluorouracil. The information in the
In VigiLyze, the combination bradycardia-
fact sheet for irinotecan describes the appearance
fluorouracil results in 139 reports from 23 countries
of bradycardia in the section on adverse reactions.19
worldwide, with Peru third after the USA (34
The report only states that the administration of
reports) and India (18 reports). Table 2 shows the
both drugs was carried out on the same day but
main characteristics of these cases (including the
does not specify the exact time of administration.
ones from Peru).
Onset of bradycardia was on day 1-3 in all the
Peruvian cases. None of the cases give any ECG
Table 2. Case series characteristics of 139 global reports on bradycardia with fluorouracil in
VigiBase
Feature N° of reports (%)
Male / Female/ Information missing 80 (58) / 52 (37) / 7 (5)
0-17y /18-44y / 45-64y /65-74 y / 75+y/ information missing 1 (1) / 26 (19) / 50 (36) / 40 (29) / 9 (6) / 13 (9)
Serious case* 71 (51)
Fatal outcome 6 (4)
Sole reported drug 31 (22)
Time to onset 0-7 days / > 7 days/ information missing 77 (55) / 26 (19) / 36 (26)
Positive dechallenge / Positive rechallenge 41 (29) / 4 (3)
*Some countries cannot report seriousness to VigiBase due to limitations in their reporting format, so the true proportion of
serious cases may be higher.
There were 13 global reports with a VigiBase fluorouracil intravenously for a diagnosis of an
completeness score of 1.00; here we illustrate four unknown neoplasm. The patient presented with
of these cases: bradycardia on the third day of administration,
so the treatment was discontinued, with the
1. France: a male patient aged 53 was
patient's recovery being observed. The report
administered fluorouracil intravenous 6300
only indicates the administration of fluorouracil.
mg/cycle to treat oropharyngeal cancer. On the
third day of treatment the patient presented An expanded search was performed in VigiBase to
with bradycardia, hypotension, bradypnea and retrieve additional cases of bradycardia but coded
allergic shock. The report indicates that the otherwise. Among the terms considered were
patient recovered after the suspension of the atrioventricular block (complete, first degree and
treatment. second degree), cardiac arrest, abnormal
electrocardiogram, sudden death. The few
2. India: a 20-year-old, 52 kg male patient was
additional cases retrieved were, after assessment,
given 900 mg/24 hr intravenously for a
not considered relevant for the signal.
diagnosis of nasopharynx malignancy; with only
fluorouracil administration reported. On the
second day of treatment the patient presented
4. Literature and labelling
with bradycardia, observing recovery two days
later, without having reported any suspension The information sheets/labelling of some
of treatment. international regulatory agencies set out
information on heart disorders or events associated
3. India: a 36-year-old male patient, 54 kg, who
with the use of fluorouracil. However, bradycardia is
was given intravenous fluorouracil 1000 mg/24
not listed in the section of adverse drug reactions,
hr for nasal cavity neoplasia. The patient
nor warnings and precautions in the country
presented with bradycardia on the fifth day
sources that were checked, such as the USA (Food
after administration, with recovery being
and Drug Administration - FDA), Spain (Agencia
observed the same day. The report only
Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios -
indicates the administration of fluorouracil.
AEMPS) and Canada (Health Canada).
4. India: a 41-year-old male patient, 68 kg and
Three peer-reviewed publications describing cases
168 cm, who was given 750 mg/24 hr
WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 5, 2020 • 20
Signal
The administration of fluorouracil and the perfusión EFG. [updated February 2019].
concomitant drugs is performed cyclically in Available at:
different doses and ways.25 However, in the https://cima.aemps.es/cima/dochtml/ft/71868/
Peruvian cases, the information regarding the exact FT_71868.html
moment of administration of each drug in relation
6. Health Canada [Internet]. Product monograph:
to the event is not clear, making it difficult to fully
Fluorouracil Injection USP 50 mg/mL (5 g/100
assess the causal relationship of each individual
mL). [updated 17 April 2018]. Available at:
drug to the adverse reaction.
https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00044861.PDF
Capecitabine, another anticancer agent, is a
7. Dailymed [Internet]. LABEL: FLUOROURACIL-
prodrug to fluorouracil which is metabolised to
fluorouracil injection, solution. [updated 23
fluorouracil in the body.26 International regulatory
February 2017]. Available at:
agencies (eg. FDA, AEMPS and EMA) include
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInf
information referring to the development of
o.cfm?setid=66d451fe-2436-494c-80c5-
bradycardia with the administration of
4528c8e34369
capecitabine.27,28,29 Taking this into account, it is
relevant to consider including bradycardia as an 8. Health Canada [internet]. Product monograph:
adverse reaction associated with the use of PrOXALIPLATIN Oxaliplatin Injection, Pfizer
fluorouracil in relevant drug information documents. Standard 5 mg/mL oxaliplatin. [updated 19
November 2018]. Available at:
Peru has 10 registered pharmaceutical products
https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00048594.PDF
that contain fluorouracil, none of which include
bradycardia as an adverse reaction or a warning. It 9. Food and Drug Administration – FDA [Internet].
is therefore suggested to include in Peru ELOXATIN (oxaliplatin) injection for intravenous
bradycardia in the sections on adverse reactions, use. [updated September 2018]. Available at:
warnings and precautions in the national drug fact https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_do
sheet, and we would like to inform the global cs/label/2015/021759s019lbledt.pdf
network for consideration at national level.
10. Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos
The analysis and writing of the signal were Sanitarios-AEMPS [Internet]. FOLINATO
performed with kind peer review by colleagues from CÁLCICO NORMON 50 mg Polvo y disolvente
the Uppsala Monitoring Centre who participated in para solución inyectable EFG / FOLINATO
the workshop mentioned in the text; Birgitta CÁLCICO NORMON 350 mg Polvo para solución
Grundmark, Lovisa Sandberg, and Elki Sollenbring. inyectable EFG. Available at:
https://cima.aemps.es/cima/dochtml/ft/70340/
FT_70340.html
References:
11. Food and Drug Adminsitration-FDA [internet].
1. MedlinePlus [Internet]. U.S. National Library of LevoLeucovorin injection. [updated November
Medicine. [updated 30 December 2019]. 2013]. Available at:
Fluorouracil Injection. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_do
https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a68270 cs/label/2015/203563Orig1s000lbl.pdf
8.html
12. Health Canada [Internet]. Product monograph:
2. Dailymed [Internet]. U.S. National Library of PRODUCT MONOGRAPH LEUCOVORIN CALCIUM
Medicine. [updated 23 February 2017]. Label: INJECTION 10 mg/mL USP. [updated August
Fluorouracil injection, solution. Available at: 2018]. Available at:
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInf https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00046849.PDF
o.cfm?setid=66d451fe-2436-494c-80c5-
13. Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos
4528c8e34369#L8a71c005-1a49-46d2-a01a-
Sanitarios-AEMPS [Internet]. Docetaxel Hospira
0786b921dc76
10 mg/ml concentrado para solución para
3. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory perfusión. [updated September 2018].
Agency – MHRA [Internet]. SUMMARY OF Disponible en:
PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS- Fluorouracil 25 https://cima.aemps.es/cima/dochtml/ft/71799/
mg/ml Injection. [updated 12 April 2019]. FT_71799.html
Available at:
14. Food and Drug Administration – FDA [Internet].
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/spcpil/d
DOCETAXEL INJECTION, for intravenous use.
ocuments/spcpil/con1555647114072.pdf
[updated September 2018]. Available at:
4. UpToDate [Internet]. Sinus bradycardia. [23 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_do
January 2019]. Available at: cs/label/2018/022234s011,202356s003lbl.pdf
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/sinus-
15. Health Canada [Internet]. Product monograph:
bradycardia
PrDOCETAXEL INJECTION USP 10 mg/mL
5. Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sterile Solution. [updated June 2019]. Available
Sanitarios-AEMPS [Internet]. Fluorouracilo at: https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00045702.PDF
Accord 50 mg/ml solución inyectable o para
16. Health Canada [Internet]. Product monograph:
WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter No. 5, 2020 • 22
Signal
CAVEAT DOCUMENT
Statement of reservations, limitations and conditions relating to data released from
VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs).
Understanding and accepting the content of this document are formal conditions for the use of
VigiBase data.
Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) in its role as the World For these reasons, interpretations of adverse effect
Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for data, and particularly those based on comparisons
International Drug Monitoring receives reports of between medicinal products, may be misleading.
suspected adverse reactions to medicinal products from The data comes from a variety of sources and the
National Centres in countries participating in the WHO likelihood of a causal relationship varies across
Programme for International Drug Monitoring. The reports. Any use of VigiBase data must take these
information is stored in VigiBase, the WHO global significant variables into account.
database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs). It is
Prohibited use of VigiBase Data includes, but is not
important to understand the limitations and qualifications
limited to:
that apply to this information and its use.
• patient identification or patient targeting
Tentative and variable nature of the data
• identification, profiling or targeting of general
Uncertainty: The reports submitted to UMC generally
practitioners or practice
describe no more than suspicions which have arisen from
observation of an unexpected or unwanted event. In most Any publication, in whole or in part, of information
instances it cannot be proven that a specific medicinal obtained from VigiBase must include a statement:
product is the cause of an event, rather than, for example,
(i) recording ‘VigiBase, the WHO global database of
underlying illness or other concomitant medication.
individual case safety reports (ICSRs)’ as the source
Variability of source: Reports submitted to national of the information
centres come from both regulated and voluntary sources.
(ii) explaining that the information comes from a variety
Practice varies: some national centres accept reports only
of sources, and the probability that the suspected
from medical practitioners; others from a broader range of
adverse effect is drug-related is not the same in all
reporters, including patients, some include reports from
cases
pharmaceutical companies.
(iii) affirming that the information does not represent the
Contingent influences: The volume of reports for a
opinion of the UMC or the World Health Organization.
particular medicinal product may be influenced by the
extent of use of the product, publicity, the nature of the Omission of this statement may exclude the
adverse effects and other factors. responsible person or organization from receiving
further information from VigiBase.
No prevalence data: No information is provided on the
UMC may, in its sole discretion, provide further
number of patients exposed to the product, and only a
instructions to the user, responsible person and/or
small part of the reactions occurring are reported.
organization in addition to those specified in this
Time to VigiBase: Some national centres make an statement and the user, responsible person and/or
assessment of the likelihood that a medicinal product organization undertakes to comply with all such
caused the suspected reaction, while others do not. Time instructions.
from receipt of an ICSR by a national centre until
submission to UMC varies from country to country. Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC)
Information obtained from UMC may therefore differ from Box 1051, SE-751 40 Uppsala, Sweden
that obtained directly from national centres. Tel: +46-18-65 60 60, E-mail: [email protected]
www.who-umc.org