Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 54

eTextbook 978-0199769100 The Oxford

Handbook of Poverty and Child


Development (Oxford Library of
Psychology)
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-978-0199769100-the-oxford-handbook-of-
poverty-and-child-development-oxford-library-of-psychology/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

eTextbook 978-0199731763 The Oxford Handbook of Sport


and Performance Psychology (Oxford Library of
Psychology)

https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-978-0199731763-the-
oxford-handbook-of-sport-and-performance-psychology-oxford-
library-of-psychology/

The Oxford Handbook of the Psychology of Competition


(Oxford Library of Psychology) Stephen M. Garcia

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-the-
psychology-of-competition-oxford-library-of-psychology-stephen-m-
garcia/

The Oxford Handbook of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy


(Oxford Library of Psychology) – Ebook PDF Version

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-dialectical-
behaviour-therapy-oxford-library-of-psychology-ebook-pdf-version/

The Oxford Handbook of Compassion Science (Oxford


Library of Psychology) 1st Edition, (Ebook PDF)

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-compassion-
science-oxford-library-of-psychology-1st-edition-ebook-pdf/
eTextbook 978-0470335444 Handbook of Evidence-Based
Practice in Clinical Psychology, Child and Adolescent
Disorders: Volume 1

https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-978-0470335444-handbook-
of-evidence-based-practice-in-clinical-psychology-child-and-
adolescent-disorders-volume-1/

The Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory


(OXFORD LIBRARY OF PSYCHOLOGY SERIES) 1st Edition
Richard M. Ryan

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-self-
determination-theory-oxford-library-of-psychology-series-1st-
edition-richard-m-ryan/

Handbook of Parenting and Child Development Across the


Lifespan eBook

https://ebookmass.com/product/handbook-of-parenting-and-child-
development-across-the-lifespan-ebook/

Oxford Textbook of Psychopathology (Oxford Library of


Psychology) 4th Edition Robert F. Krueger (Editor)

https://ebookmass.com/product/oxford-textbook-of-psychopathology-
oxford-library-of-psychology-4th-edition-robert-f-krueger-editor/

The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology Manuel Vargas

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-moral-
psychology-manuel-vargas/
O X F O R D L I B R A R Y O F P S YC H O L O G Y

The Oxford Library of Psychology, a landmark series of handbooks, is published by


Oxford University Press, one of the world’s oldest and most highly respected pub-
lishers, with a tradition of publishing significant books in psychology. The ambi-
tious goal of the Oxford Library of Psychology is nothing less than to span a vibrant,
wide-ranging field and, in so doing, to fill a clear market need.
Encompassing a comprehensive set of handbooks, organized hierarchically, the
Library incorporates volumes at different levels, each designed to meet a distinct
need. At one level are a set of handbooks designed broadly to survey the major sub-
fields of psychology; at another are numerous handbooks that cover important cur-
rent focal research and scholarly areas of psychology in depth and detail. Planned
as a reflection of the dynamism of psychology, the Library will grow and expand as
psychology itself develops, thereby highlighting significant new research that will
impact on the field. Adding to its accessibility and ease of use, the Library will be
published in print and, later on, electronically.
The Library surveys psychology’s principal subfields with a set of handbooks that
capture the current status and future prospects of those major subdisciplines. This
initial set includes handbooks of social and personality psychology, clinical psy-
chology, counseling psychology, school psychology, educational psychology, indus-
trial and organizational psychology, cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience,
methods and measurements, history, neuropsychology, personality assessment,
developmental psychology, and more. Each handbook undertakes to review one
of psychology’s major subdisciplines with breadth, comprehensiveness, and exem-
plary scholarship. In addition to these broadly conceived volumes, the Library also
includes a large number of handbooks designed to explore in depth more special-
ized areas of scholarship and research, such as stress, health and coping, anxiety
and related disorders, cognitive development, or child and adolescent assessment.
In contrast to the broad coverage of the subfield handbooks, each of these latter
volumes focuses on an especially productive, more highly focused line of scholar-
ship and research. Whether at the broadest or most specific level, however, all
of the Library handbooks offer synthetic coverage that reviews and evaluates the
relevant past and present research and anticipates research in the future. Each
handbook in the Library includes introductory and concluding chapters written
by its editor to provide a roadmap to the handbook’s table of contents and to offer
informed anticipations of significant future developments in that field.
An undertaking of this scope calls for handbook editors and chapter authors who
are established scholars in the areas about which they write. Many of the nation’s and
world’s most productive and best-respected psychologists have agreed to edit Library
handbooks or write authoritative chapters in their areas of expertise.

vii
For whom has the Oxford Library of Psychology been written? Because of its
breadth, depth, and accessibility, the Library serves a diverse audience, including
graduate students in psychology and their faculty mentors, scholars, researchers,
and practitioners in psychology and related fields. Each will find in the Library the
information they seek on the subfield or focal area of psychology in which they
work or are interested.
Befitting its commitment to accessibility, each handbook includes a comprehen-
sive index, as well as extensive references to help guide research. And because the
Library was designed from its inception as an online as well as a print resource, its
structure and contents will be readily and rationally searchable online. Further,
once the Library is released online, the handbooks will be regularly and thoroughly
updated.
In summary, the Oxford Library of Psychology will grow organically to provide a
thoroughly informed perspective on the field of psychology, one that reflects both
psychology’s dynamism and its increasing interdisciplinarity. Once published elec-
tronically, the Library is also destined to become a uniquely valuable interactive
tool, with extended search and browsing capabilities. As you begin to consult this
handbook, we sincerely hope you will share our enthusiasm for the more than
500-year tradition of Oxford University Press for excellence, innovation, and qual-
ity, as exemplified by the Oxford Library of Psychology.

Peter E. Nathan
Editor-in-Chief
Oxford Library of Psychology

viii oxfo rd l i br a ry of p syc h olog y


A B O U T T H E E D I TO R S

Valerie Maholmes
Valerie Maholmes, PhD, is the Program Director for the Social and Affective
Development/Child Maltreatment and Violence Research Program in the Child
Development and Behavior Branch at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development at the National Institutes of Health. In
this capacity she provides scientific leadership on research and research training rel-
evant to normative social, affective, and personality development in children from
the newborn period through adolescence, and on the impact of specific aspects of
physical and social environments on the health and psychological development of
infants, children, and adolescents. Most recently she developed an initiative calling
for research on children in military families. Her research interests include the biop-
sychosocial effects of poverty on children’s development, and the role of resilience
in child outcomes.

Rosalind B. King
Rosalind B. King, PhD, is a Health Scientist Administrator in the Demographic
and Behavioral Sciences Branch of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development. She oversees research portfolios on
fertility, infertility, adoption, and kinship; work-family issues and health; and the
Population Research Mentored Career Development Program. Most recently, she
developed an initiative on sleep and the social environment for the trans-NIH Basic
Behavioral and Social Science Opportunity Network. Her own research interests
include interracial marriage and assisted reproductive technologies.

ix
This page intentionally left blank
P R E FA C E

When our older daughter was growing up, she said that she was not going to be a
researcher—she was going to do something useful… And one can see how a young
person might feel that way. Rates of poverty have been high for decades, especially
among families with children, both in relative and absolute terms, and poverty has
been rising in recent years. An activist might decry spending more than a decade
on research studies.
However, basic research has much to offer society. For example, research can high-
light trends and patterns, such as the recent increase in poverty and the high rates of
poverty among children relative to the elderly. In addition, analyses can identify sub-
groups where issues are particularly of concern, such as the high rates of poverty found
among children of color and children in single-mother families.
Research can also highlight topics that are risk factors, such as deep and chronic
poverty among young children. Research has identified early childhood as an age
period not only when poverty is more common but also when the implications
of poverty seem particularly severe. In addition, a growing research base is iden-
tifying protective factors, such as the importance of fathers to families and chil-
dren. Fathers, research indicates, matter not only for their economic contributions
but also for their positive (and under some circumstances negative) influences on
children’s development. Accordingly, father involvement, single parenthood, and
family disruption have been highlighted as risk and protective factors intertwined
with poverty.
On the other hand, research can also serve to identify issues that are not prob-
lems. For example, maternal employment has not been found to be negative for
poor children, if child care quality and consistency are good. And research suggests
that frequent moves per se are not as challenging as moves driven by economic
factors, for adults at least. These kinds of analyses can suggest that programs and
policies need not focus on generic changes in residence or employment for moth-
ers, but might look more profitably in specific directions within these phenomena.
Implicit in such research is sorting through issues of causality; often the same factor,
for example, teen childbearing, is both a cause and an effect of poverty.
In addition, research can identify the mechanisms through which an experience
like poverty affects families and children. Some mechanisms are fairly obvious, such
as the amount and quality of food available for growing children. Other mecha-
nisms are more subtle, such as family stress due to economic hardship and uncer-
tainty, which affects not only family dynamics but also children’s experiences with
peers and institutions such as schools and public services. This kind of information
is useful for identifying both preventive approaches and ameliorative strategies.

xi
An understanding of the factors that are critical to families and children can
inform the development of both intervention programs and public policies. For
example, evidence that mothers with children often experience considerable mate-
rial hardship after family disruption suggests directions for programs, such as job
training to increase earnings, marriage education to help couples build stronger
families, and pregnancy prevention efforts to reduce the number of uncommitted
couples who find themselves parents. Public policies can include child support and
health insurance.
Evaluation studies represent another critical contribution of research. They exam-
ine whether intervention strategies are effective and whether policies are associated
with the effects that policy makers intend. Hence, research can not only suggest
directions for intervention but it can also contribute to assessing whether interven-
tions have the desired impacts. In addition, research can examine whether interven-
tions have unintended consequences.
Good research, of course, is rigorous, non-partisan, and replicable. In a society
driven by partisan divides and advocates for points of view that have little common
ground, research can provide a common platform of facts on which to meet.
All of these ideas, and many more, are shared in the pages of this book, providing
considerable evidence of the many ways that research is relevant to addressing pov-
erty. And they provide considerable evidence of the value of the interdisciplinary
science supported by the SEED (Science and the Ecology of Early Development)
initiative in particular. Research matters. Our daughter came to agree as well. She
completed a Ph.D. in human development and social policy and has become a
researcher herself.

Kristin A. Moore, PhD


Senior Scholar
Child Trends
Washington, DC

xii pre face


AC K N OW L E D G M E N T

We thank our colleagues from NICHD, NIDA, and NIMH; Martha Zaslow and
the 2011 Society for Research on Child Development (SRCD) Fellows; OBSSR
SRCD Fellows (past and present); and members of the inaugural class of the
NICHD Summer Institute, whose valuable input clarified and improved this
volume. We also thank Khalisa Herman Phillips for her invaluable assistance facili-
tating our communication with the authors. Many thanks to our Branch Chiefs,
Peggy McCardle and Rebecca Clark, for their support during this process.

p reface xiii
This page intentionally left blank
CO N T R I B U TO R S

Abbey Alkon Jeanne Brooks-Gunn


School of Nursing College of Physicians and Surgeons
University of California, San Francisco Teachers College
San Francisco, CA Columbia University
William R. Beardslee New York, NY
Department of Psychiatry Susan L. Brown
Children’s Hospital Boston Department of Sociology
Boston, MA Bowling Green State University
Jeanette Betancourt Bowling Green, OH
Sesame Workshop Patricia Castellanos
New York, NY Kent State University
Theresa S. Betancourt Department of Psychology
François-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health Kent, OH
and Human Rights Edith Chen
Harvard School of Public Health Department of Psychology
Department of Global Health and University of British Columbia
Population Vancouver, CA
Boston, MA Rebecca Clark
Claude Bonazzo Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
Department of Sociology and Population of Child Health and Human
Research Center Development
University of Texas at Austin Bethesda, MD
Austin, TX David Cohen
W. Thomas Boyce Sesame Workshop
College for Interdisciplinary Studies and New York, NY
Faculty of Medicine Katherine Jewsbury Conger
School of Population and Public Human and Community Development
Health University of California, Davis
University of British Columbia Davis, CA
Vancouver, Canada Rand D. Conger
Mary Bratsch-Hines Human and Community
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Development
School of Education University of California, Davis
Chapel Hill, NC Davis, CA
Gene H. Brody Jessica L. Craine
Center for Family Research Human and Community Development
University of Georgia University of California, Davis
Athens, GA Davis, CA

xv
Robert Crosnoe Adam Gamoran
Department of Sociology and Population Department of Sociology
Research Center University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Texas at Austin Madison, WI
Austin, TX Kristen Anderson Moore
Allison De Marco Child Trends
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Washington, DC
Institute and Nicole Gardner-Neblett
The School of Social Work Frank Porter Graham Child Development
University of North Carolina at Institute
Chapel Hill University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, NC Chapel Hill
Jen H. Dolan Chapel Hill, NC
Department of Psychology Patricia Garrett-Peters
University of Massachusetts Amherst Frank Porter Graham Child
Amherst, MA Development Institute
Rachel E. Dunifon University of North Carolina at
Department of Policy Analysis and Chapel Hill
Management Chapel Hill, NC
Cornell University Paul J. Gertler
Ithaca, NY Haas School of Business and
Petra A. Duran the School of Public Health
Department of Psychology University of California, Berkeley
Kent State University Berkeley, CA
Kent, OH Jennifer E. Glick
Gary W. Evans School Social Family Dynamics
Departments of Design and Environmental Arizona State University
Analysis and of Human Development Tempe, AZ
Cornell University Kathleen S. Gorman
Ithaca, NY Department of Psychology
Martha J. Farah University of Rhode Island
Center for Neuroscience and Society Kingston, RI
University of Pennsylvania Deborah Gorman-Smith
Philadelphia, PA Chapin Hall
Lia C. H. Fernald University of Chicago
School of Public Health Chicago, IL
Community Health and Human Christina M. Grange
Development Center for Family Research
University of California, Berkeley University of Georgia
Berkeley, CA Athens, GA
Jeremy Fiel Holly A. Grant-Marsney
Department of Sociology Department of Psychology
University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Madison, WI Amherst, MA
Quade Y. S. French Josefina M. Grau
Department of Psychology Department of Psychology
University of Massachusetts, Amherst Kent State University
Amherst, MA Kent, OH

xvi co n tri buto r s


Harold D. Grotevant Tiffani S. Kisler
Department of Psychology Human Development and Family Studies
University of Massachusetts, Amherst University of Rhode Island
Amherst, MA Kingston, RI
Daniel A. Hackman Steven M. Kogan
Department of Psychology Child and Family Development
University of Pennsylvania University of Georgia
Philadelphia, PA Athens, GA
Nina M. Philipsen Hetzner Brandon A. Kohrt
Columbia University Department of Anthropology
New York, NY Emory University
Melissa Hidrobo Atlanta, GA
International Food Policy Research Institute, Kathleen Kostelny
Washington D.C. Columbia Group for Children in Adversity
Harris S. Huberman New York, NY
Department of Pediatrics Jennifer A. Kotler
Division of Child Development Sesame Workshop
State University of New York Downstate New York, NY
University Hospital of Brooklyn Vesna Kutlesic
Brooklyn, NY Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of
New York, NY Child Health and Human Development
Elizabeth Grisa Hunt National Institutes of Health
Chapin Hall US Department of Health and Human
University of Chicago Services
Chicago, IL Bethesda, MD
Aletha C. Huston Tonya Lane
Department of Human Development National Institutes of Health
and Family Sciences Department of Psychology
School of Human Ecology University of Pittsburgh
University of Texas at Austin Pittsburgh, PA
Austin, TX Jennifer E. Lansford
Erin M. Ingoldsby Center for Child and Family Policy
OMNI Institute Duke University
Denver, CO Durham, NC
Anna D. Johnson Daniel Lende
Department of Psychology College of Arts and Sciences
Georgetown University Department of Anthropology
Washington, DC University of South Florida
Ariel Kalil Tampa, FL
The Harris School Liliana J. Lengua
University of Chicago Department of Psychology
Chicago, IL University of Washington
Rosalind B. King Seattle, WA
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Wendy M. Little
Institute of Child Health and Human Department of Human and Community
Development Development
National Institutes of Health University of California, Davis
Bethesda, MD Davis, CA

contribu tors xvii


Valerie Maholmes Jung Min Park
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National School of Social Work
Institute of Child Health and Human University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Development Urbana, IL
National Institutes of Health Cathi Propper
Bethesda, MD Center for Developmental Science
Monica J. Martin University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Human and Community Development Chapel Hill, NC
University of California, Davis Elizabeth Puhn Pungello
Davis, CA Frank Porter Graham Child Development
Karen McCurdy Institute
Human Development and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Family Studies Chapel Hill, NC
University of Rhode Island Ben T. Reeb
Kingston, RI Human and Community Development
Alan L. Mendelsohn University of California, Davis
Department of Pediatrics Davis, CA
Division of Developmental-Behavioral Dylan Robertson
Pediatrics Chapin Hall
New York University School of Medicine University of Chicago
and Bellevue Hospital Center Chicago, IL
New York, NY Michelle Sarche
Elizabeth Metallinos-Katsaras School of Public Health
Department of Nutrition University of Colorado
Simmons College Aurora, CO
Boston, MA Narayan Sastry
Gregory Miller Population Studies Center and Survey
Department of Psychology Research Center
University of British Columbia Institute for Social Research
Vancouver, Canada University of Michigan
W. Roger Mills-Koonce Ann Arbor, MI
Center for Developmental Science Teresa Seeman
University of North Carolina at Chapel Division of Geriatrics
Hill David Geffen School of Medicine
Chapel Hill, NC University of California at Los Angeles
Danila S. Musante Los Angeles, CA
Department of Psychology Daniel S. Shaw
University of Massachusetts, Amherst Department of Psychology
Amherst, MA University of Pittsburgh
Valentina Nikulina Pittsburgh, PA
Department of Psychology Barbara Shebloski
John Jay College Human and Community Development
City University of New York University of California, Davis
New York, NY Davis, CA
Catherine Panter-Brick Elizabeth C. Shelleby
Department of Anthropology Department of Psychology
Yale University University of Pittsburgh
New Haven, CT Pittsburgh, PA

xviii co n tri buto r s


Daniel A. Singer Mary Bruce Webb
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Administration for Children and Families
Child Health and Human Development US Department of Health and Human
National Institutes of Health Services
Bethesda, MD Washington, DC
Erin N. Smith Michael G. Wessells
Department of Psychology Mailman School of Public Health
Kent State University Columbia University
Kent, OH New York, NY
Paul Spicer Cathy Spatz Widom
Department of Anthropology Department of Psychology
University of Oklahoma John Jay College
Norman, OK City University of New York
Nissa Towe-Goodman New York, NY
Center of Developmental Science Kathryn S. Wilson
University of North Carolina at Department of Economics
Chapel Hill Kent State University
Chapel Hill, NC Kent, OH
Rosemarie Truglio Brian Wolff
Sesame Workshop School of Medicine
New York, NY University of Colorado, Denver
Ruth N. López Turley Aurora, CO
Department of Sociology Nina Wu
Rice University Department of Sociology and Population
Houston, TX Research Center
Lynne Vernon-Feagans University of Texas at Austin
School of Education Austin, TX
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Kathleen M. Ziol-Guest
Chapel Hill, NC Department of Policy Analysis and
Jane Waldfogel Management
School of Social Work Cornell University
Columbia University Ithaca, NY
New York, NY

contribu tors xix


This page intentionally left blank
CONTENTS

Introduction: Why Study Poverty? 1


Valerie Maholmes

Part One • Why Worry About Poverty?: The Long-Term


Effects on Children and Families
1. How Poverty Gets Under the Skin: A Life Course Perspective 13
Gary W. Evans, Edith Chen, Gregory Miller, and Teresa Seeman
2. Economic Hardship and Its Consequences Across Generations 37
Katherine Jewsbury Conger, Monica J. Martin, Ben T. Reeb,
Wendy M. Little, Jessica L. Craine, Barbara Shebloski, and Rand D. Conger
3. Poverty Status and the Effects of Family Structure on
Child Well-Being 54
Susan L. Brown
4. Long-Term Consequences of Child Neglect in Low-Income Families 68
Cathy Spatz Widom and Valentina Nikulina
5. Children and Families in Poverty: Federal Perspectives on
Applied Research and Evaluation 86
Mary Bruce Webb

Part Two • Inside the Family: Impact on Child and


Family Functioning
6. The Early Development of Vagal Tone: Effects of Poverty and
Elevated Contextual Risk 103
Cathi Propper
7. Maternal Mental Health and Child Health and Nutrition 124
Karen McCurdy, Kathleen S. Gorman, Tiffani S. Kisler, and
Elizabeth Metallinos-Katsaras
8. Fatherhood and Fathering Among Low-Income and Minority Men 145
Deborah Gorman-Smith, Elizabeth Grisa Hunt, and Dylan Robertson
9. Adolescent Parenting: Risk and Protective Factors in the
Context of Poverty 157
Josefina M. Grau, Kathryn S. Wilson, Erin N. Smith,
Patricia Castellanos, and Petra A. Duran
10. Cognitive Development and Family Resources Among Children of
Immigrant Families 183
Jennifer E. Glick and Rebecca Clark

xxi
11. The Dynamic of Poverty and Affluence in Child Adoption 197
Harold D. Grotevant, Holly A. Grant-Marsney, Quade Y. S. French,
Danila S. Musante, and Jen H. Dolan

Part Three • The Working Poor


12. Poverty, Stress, and Autonomic Reactivity 221
Abbey Alkon, Brian Wolff, and W. Thomas Boyce
13. Employment in Low-Income Families 240
Nina M. Philipsen Hetzner and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
14. Nonstandard Work Schedules and Child Development 260
Rachel E. Dunifon, Kathleen M. Ziol-Guest, and Ariel Kalil
15. How Welfare and Employment Policies Influence
Children’s Development 278
Aletha C. Huston
16. Work-Family Policies and Child Well-Being in Low-Income Families 294
Jane Waldfogel

Part Four • Educational Environments and Child Outcomes


17. SES, Childhood Experience, and the Neural Bases of Cognition 307
Martha J. Farah and Daniel A. Hackman
18. Family Factors, Childcare Quality, and Cognitive Outcomes 319
Elizabeth Puhn Pungello and Nicole Gardner-Neblett
19. Child Health and Early Education 338
Robert Crosnoe, Nina Wu, and Claude Bonazzo
20. Child Care and Early Education for Low-Income Families:
Choices and Consequences 354
Anna D. Johnson, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
21. Evidence-Based School Interventions to Reduce
Achievement Inequality 372
Adam Gamoran, Ruth N. López Turley, and Jeremy Fiel

Part Five • Neighborhoods, Communities, and Contextual Factors


22. Poverty and HPA Functioning in Young Children 387
W. Roger Mills-Koonce and Nissa Towe-Goodman
23. Extrafamilial Contexts and Children’s Conduct Problems 404
Erin M. Ingoldsby, Elizabeth Shelleby, Tonya Lane, and Daniel S. Shaw
24. Neighborhood Effects on Children’s Achievement: A Review of
Recent Research 423
Narayan Sastry
25. Children Living in Rural Poverty: The Role of Chaos in
Early Development 448
Lynne Vernon-Feagans, Patricia Garrett-Peters,
Allison De Marco, and Mary Bratsch-Hines

xxii co n ten ts
26. Homelessness and Child Outcomes 467
Jung Min Park
27. Poverty and Possibility in the Lives of American Indian and Alaska Native
Children 480
Paul Spicer and Michelle Sarche

Part Six • Helping Families Help Themselves: Evidence-Based


Interventions
28. Poverty, the Development of Effortful Control, and Children’s Academic,
Social, and Emotional Adjustment 491
Liliana J. Lengua
29. Preventive Interventions: Parenting and the Home Environment 512
Harris S. Huberman and Alan L. Mendelsohn
30. Interventions for Low-Income Families: Sesame Workshop’s Educational
Outreach and the Healthy Habits for Life Initiative 539
David Cohen, Rosemarie Truglio, Jennifer A. Kotler, and Jeanette Betancourt
31. Translating Longitudinal, Developmental Research With Rural African
American Families Into Prevention Programs for Rural African American
Youth 551
Gene H. Brody, Steven M. Kogan, and Christina M. Grange
32. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Effects on Growth, Health and
Development in Young Children 569
Lia C. H. Fernald, Paul J. Gertler, and Melissa Hidrobo

Part Seven • International Perspectives on the Mental Health and


Psychosocial Consequences of Poverty
33. Children in Global Adversity: Physical Health, Mental Health, Behavioral
Health, and Symbolic Health 603
Catherine Panter-Brick, Daniel Lende, and Brandon Kohrt
34. Addressing the Consequences of Concentrated Adversity on Child and
Adolescent Mental Health 622
Theresa S. Betancourt and William R. Beardslee
35. Everyday Distress: Psychosocial and Economic Impact of Forced
Migration on Children and Families 640
Michael G. Wessells and Kathleen Kostelny
36. Cross-Cultural and Cross-National Parenting Perspectives 656
Jennifer E. Lansford
37. Humanitarian Crises in Low-Resource Settings: Evidence-Based Mental
Health and Psychosocial Interventions for Children 678
Dan A. Singer and Vesna Kutlesic
38. Future Directions in Research on Children and Poverty 694
Rosalind King

Index 703

contents xxiii
This page intentionally left blank
Introduction: Why Study Poverty?

Valerie Maholmes

For more than a decade, the Eunice Kennedy initiative, whose work is consistent with the aims
Shriver National Institute of Child Health and of this volume. We have invited leading scholars
Human Development has been supporting who represent a variety of disciplinary perspectives
research and engaging the research community to contribute to this volume. Thus, the volume is
on the importance of identifying the full range of enhanced by research that addresses unique ques-
individual, social, economic, cultural, and commu- tions that advance the science beyond the scope of
nity factors, and the interactions among these fac- our original program objectives. Finally, because we
tors that are directly relevant to the development are living in a global society and are affected and
of children in low-income families. We wanted to informed by international issues, we deemed it
address children living in fragile circumstances, important to examine the consequences of poverty
including homeless children, children in foster on the psychosocial and mental well-being of chil-
care, and children living in families affected by dren in international settings.
chronic physical or mental health problems such Each part of this volume is “self-contained,”
as depression or substance abuse. We also wanted opening with a basic biobehavioral research chapter
to to address the multiple domains of development addressing the biological ramifications of poverty
including social, emotional, cognitive and linguis- on children’s developmental outcomes, followed by
tic development. chapters describing applied analyses of contempo-
This volume is an outgrowth of our research rary issues currently at the heart of public debates
initiative called the Science and Ecology of Early on child health and well-being, and ending with a
Development, (SEED) in which we sought to craft chapter focusing on a policy issue. In organizing the
a research agenda that would examine the impact of volume this way, we hope the readers will have a
poverty on child development and health outcomes. more holistic picture of the impact of poverty on
Through collaborative interdisciplinary research, we children’s development. Children’s behavioral and
hoped to identify the most pressing scientific issues psychosocial experiences are inextricably linked to
involving poverty and child development; and to the policy context within which they experience
offer new ideas and research questions that could their lives. All of these affect and are affected by
lead us to develop a “new science” of research that is biological systems in the short and long term.
multidisciplinary, longitudinal, and that embraces This is important because, as the contributors
an ecological approach to the study of child devel- to this volume point out, the largest group of poor
opment. The goal of this volume is to highlight this people living in the United States is children. Over
work and to provide a comprehensive analysis of 15 million children live in families with incomes
the mechanisms through which social, economic, below the federal poverty level, and there are nearly
cultural, familial, and community-level factors, and 4 million more children living in poverty today than
their interactions, impact the early and long-term in the turn of the 21st century (Wight, Chau, &
cognitive, neurobiological, socioemotional, and Aratani, 2011). A report by Moore et al. (2009)
physical development of children living in pov- indicates that when compared to their more affluent
erty. In addition, we also wanted to recognize the counterparts, poor children are more likely to have
work of other researchers, not supported by this low academic achievement, to drop out of school,

1
and to have health and behavioral problems. Moore puts forward the notion that family structure at birth
and her colleagues go on to report that these chal- sets the stage for living arrangement transitions dur-
lenges are even more compelling for children whose ing childhood, with children born outside of mar-
families experience deep poverty, especially during riage experiencing more instability, on average, than
early childhood years, and who are “trapped” by their counterparts born to married parents.
poverty over the course of critical developmental Widom and Nikulina studied the long-term
periods. We hope that collectively, the chapters in consequences of child neglect in low-income fam-
each section will provide a comprehensive and in- ilies. In chapter 4 they assert that of all forms of
depth treatment of each topical area. child maltreatment, neglect is the most common
and the overlap of poverty with child neglect most
Part I: Why Worry About Poverty? The pronounced. Widom and Nikulina examine this
Long-Term Effects on Children and overlap and call attention to the similarity in out-
Families comes associated with poverty and neglect. They
Part I of this volume begins with Gary Evans review, research on the contributions of childhood
and colleagues focusing in chapter 1 on biological neglect and childhood poverty to mental health,
mechanisms to explain how disadvantage gets under academic, and behavioral outcomes.
the skin. They posit that early-life deprivation is Finally, Mary Bruce Webb in chapter 5 discusses
significant in that it shapes physical health trajec- the historical and contemporary research initiated
tories over the course of life. Evans and colleagues by federal program offices to address these chal-
describe how biological processes could account for lenges and to advance the knowledge base about dis-
the impacts of early experiences of disadvantage on advantaged children and families. Examples include
health trajectories over the life course. They ask the large-scale longitudinal studies that have provided
following: Does the timing and duration of expo- foundational information about the characteristics
sure to disadvantage over the life course matter? If and life histories of individuals who live in poverty;
biological mechanisms are changed by deprivation large-scale evaluations; and smaller research and
early in life, what causes these changes to persist evaluation programs that target issues of particular
throughout the life course? relevance to low-income families.
Also presented in Part I is a treatment of the The provocative discussions in Part I under-
intergenerational effects of poverty. Conger and score the need for researchers, practitioners, and
colleagues in chapter 2 examine economic stress policy makers to maintain a focus on poverty—its
and hardship across three generations of rural direct and moderating effects, as well as the mediat-
Midwestern families. They found that economic ing influences of economic resources on children’s
hardship experienced during adolescence predicted developmental and health trajectories.
economic hardship in young adulthood, and this
process was linked to developmental outcomes of Part II: Inside the Family: Impact on Child
the third generation. They also found that economic and Family Functioning
hardship in the first generation of families they stud- The effects of family dynamics and parent-child
ied decreased the second generation’s association relations on child developmental outcomes has
with conventional peers, participation in extracur- been well documented in the literature from the
ricular activities, later educational attainment, and early work of Bowlby (1958) and Ainsworth et al.
parents’ assistance with college. Hardship in the first (1978) to more contemporary scholarship (Belsky,
generation also was associated with adolescent per- 2008; Slade et al., 2005). Bronfrenbrenner’s eco-
sonality traits such as higher negative emotionality logical model underscores the centrality of the fam-
and lower conscientiousness. Conger and colleagues ily in shaping children’s worldviews and having a
conclude that economic hardship in the first genera- strong influence on their well-being. A review of
tion diminishes the personal and social resources of research on relationship quality and child outcomes
youth, thus increasing risk for hardship in the next by Moore and colleagues(2011) found that happy
generation. parental relationships are consistently related to
Part I also includes a treatment of poverty status better outcomes for children across the varied eco-
and the effects of family structure on child well-being. nomic, racial, and family subgroups they studied.
Susan Brown in chapter 3 asserts that children’s However, what remains understudied are the spe-
family structure and instability have important con- cific ways in which family structure and function-
sequences for their well-being. Specifically, Brown ing might portend certain outcomes at specific

2 i n tro d ucti on
developmental periods and the role that poverty a much different, more varied, and complicated
plays in how we understand these processes. In picture. Their paper provides a compelling explica-
Part II of these volume, we take a look inside the tion of their Chicago fatherhood study and other
family to pursue these questions. We begin in research that challenges a number of stereotypes
chapter 6 with a discussion by Cathi Propper on associated with fathering among low-income and
the how the influence of socioeconomic status on minority men.
health, cognitive, and socioemotional outcomes Similarly, Josefina Grau and colleagues in chap-
starts before birth and continues into adulthood. ter 9 describe the historic trends in birthrates and
Propper focuses on the parasympathetic nervous the socioeconomic and demographic characteris-
system (as indexed by cardiac vagal tone), a branch tics of adolescent mothers in the United States as
of the autonomic nervous system that is sensitive to a backdrop for understanding the context in which
the demands of the environment. She reviews the lit- these mothers parent their children. They review the
erature on how living in conditions associated with adolescent parenting literature with a goal toward
poverty may shape the ability of infants and young uncovering the unique patterns of factors that may
children to regulate vagal response to external stress enable young mothers to parent successfully despite
or challenge and thus mediate the effect of poverty their disadvantaged conditions.
on social-emotional outcome. Propper pays specific Focusing on the early childhood period, Glick
attention to conditions within the family that may and Clark in chapter 10 review the sources of diver-
emerge as a result of living in poverty and discusses sity of the child population in the United States
how the development of vagal tone may be affected with a particular emphasis on young children of
over the first years of life, beginning in utero. immigrants. They present analyses of young chil-
McCurdy and her colleagues in chapter 7 draw dren’s cognitive and academic skill acquisition from
on the family stress model to provide a framework very early childhood into the transition to kinder-
for exploring the relationships between mater- garten and focus on the extent to which children’s
nal mental health and child health and nutrition. outcomes differ once nativity, family origins, and
Specifically, they examine what is known about the socioeconomic status are taken into account.
links between maternal depression and anxiety with Finally, Grotevant and colleagues examine con-
the increased rates of overweight, nutritional defi- nections among poverty, adoption, and child out-
ciencies, food insecurity, and overall poorer health comes through a variety of mechanisms. In chapter
observed among low-income children. McCurdy 11 they discuss ways in which poverty plays a cen-
et al. explore how maternal psychological distress tral role in the movement of children from their
may impact three parenting practices linked to these birth families to adoptive families and argue that
child health domains: (1) health-related parenting adoption is a powerful intervention in the lives of
behaviors, such as monitoring the child’s access to children whose development might have been at
television; (2) parental feeding strategies, such as risk because of poverty. Grotevant et al. conclude
how long the mother breast-feeds; and (3) food-re- with a discussion of current policies linking poverty,
lated coping strategies, such as the need to shop in a adoption, and child outcomes.
variety of stores for the best food bargains. She con-
cludes with directions to advance our understand- Part III: The Working Poor
ing of the pathway from maternal mental health to It was very important to us to have some dis-
child outcomes. cussion on the working poor. This is a population
Next, Gorman-Smith and her colleagues in that faces a variety of social, economic, and health-
chapter 8 review the research on fathering, with a related challenges. Despite the fact these individuals
particular focus on minority men living in urban have employment, they remain poor with incomes
neighborhoods. They assert that until recently the that place them at or below the poverty level. As
majority of research on fathers and father involve- a consequence, they may not have sufficient access
ment had been conducted with married and primar- or be available to receive important services, includ-
ily middle-class samples. Moreover, research on poor ing health care because of the variability in work
and unmarried fathers tended to use mother reports schedules and need for transportation and child
about fathers or summarily characterized these men care. In Part III of this volume, we address these
as uninvolved, irresponsible and as causes of much issues. We start with a discussion on the relations
of the risk for their children. The authors suggest between poverty and adverse experiences in child-
that recent quantitative and qualitative studies offer hood, underscoring the exacerbating role of stress in

mah olmes 3
family functioning and ultimately in child physical continues in chapter 15 with Huston’s review of
and mental health outcomes. This is a particularly the research investigating the effects of welfare and
important conceptual framework for understand- employment policies on children’s development.
ing the challenges of the working poor and the Huston discusses how the effects on children’s well-
deleterious impact of these challenges on children’s being vary depending on the features of the policies
development. In chapter 12, Alkon and colleagues in place and illuminates how such policy variations
review autonomic nervous system measures of chil- matter for children’s well-being.
dren’s basal and biologic stress responses, and dis- The last chapter (16) in Part III focuses on the
cuss theories elucidating how biologic sensitivity to policy impacts on the working poor. Waldfogel
context may explain the ways in which children’s examines work-family policies and their relation-
psychobiologic responses differ based on the child’s ship to child well-being and asserts that families in
exposure to adversity. Alkon et al.’s explication of which American children live have changed dra-
these responses sheds light on the potential long- matically in recent years. Stay-at-home mothers,
term effects on children’s overall development and once the norm, have become an increasingly rare
well-being. phenomenon, due to two major trends in fam-
Following that discussion, Hetzner and Brooks- ily and work arrangements. As a consequence, an
Gunn (chapter 13) examine the impact of parental increasing number of children live with single par-
employment on child outcomes. The authors argue ents, and an increasing number of mothers (in both
that parental employment out of the home influ- single-parent and two-parent families) work in the
ences aspects of the child’s environment—namely labor market. Waldfogel goes on to argue that the
the amount of time spent with a child, the amount changes in family and work arrangements have pro-
of language used by parents with the child, the par- found implications for the role of work-family poli-
ent-child attachment relationship, specific aspects cies in promoting child well-being, particularly in
of the home environment itself, child care arrange- low-income families.
ments, the household income, and the family’s access
to health care. The authors present specific findings Part IV: Educational Environments and
from research that point to important differences Child Outcomes
between employment in low-income samples versus Next we provide an analysis of educational envi-
higher- or nationally representative income samples. ronments and their influences on child outcomes
In a low-income context, the research suggests that in Part IV. We have learned from the chapters in
employment has either no association or a small the previous section that environment matters.
positive association with child development. In con- From the early childhood period through ado-
trast, research on income levels in a nationally rep- lescence, children and youth are affected by and
resentative context suggest that employment early affect the context within which they live. Because
in a child’s life has a negative association with their children spend the vast majority of their devel-
socioemotional and cognitive development. The opmental experience in school and other educa-
authors suggest that differences in effects by income tional contexts, we deemed it essential to review
are likely due to differences in the way low- and the important role of these environments on poor
higher-income children experience the pathways children’s development. We start this section with
through which employment is linked with develop- a review by Farah and Hackman (chapter 17) of
ment. Along the same vein, Dunifon and colleagues the research on the neural basis of child cognition.
in chapter 14 present a model describing the poten- They theorize that socioeconomic status (SES)
tial linkages between maternal nonstandard work during childhood predicts a vast array of life out-
and child well-being and describe how these linkages comes, including cognitive ability and academic
may differ for less economically advantaged children. achievement. The authors suggest that under-
These two chapters underscore the need for more standing how low childhood SES is associated
focused research that elucidates the critical associa- with lower cognitive and educational outcomes
tions among parental work schedules, the timing of has the potential to reduce the intergenerational
parental employment and child outcomes. transmission of poverty. Their explication of the
The challenges associated with balancing work neuroscience of poverty has implications for how
and family obligations are particularly acute for educators and policy makers can develop educa-
low-income families because they have few pri- tional interventions targeted toward improving the
vate resources with which to purchase care. Part III achievement of low-income children.

4 i n tro d ucti on
The chapter that follows provides an analysis inequality for children from ethnic and racial
of family factors, child care quality, and cogni- minority groups and those with low socioeconomic
tive outcomes. Here, in chapter 18, Pungello and status. Gamoran, Turley, and Fiel discuss large-scale
Gardner-Neblett discuss the associations among interventions such as school desegregation, class-
the environmental contexts children experience size reduction, and comprehensive school reform
and elaborate how these may potentially influ- as having some benefits for reducing inequality.
ence development. Particular attention is given They discuss the benefits and consequences of these
to the home and child care environments, exam- efforts for low-income children. Most importantly,
ining the effects of family on children’s cognitive they underscore the critical importance of maintain-
and language development. Next, we move to an ing the methodological integrity of these initiatives
analysis of child health and health outcomes. In and interventions so that the best evidence can be
chapter 19, Crosnoe, Wu, and Bonazzo discuss applied to address the needs of those children most
role of family poverty in the connection between in need.
physical health and the acquisition of cognitive
and academic skills early in childhood. Drawing Part V: Neighborhoods, Communities, and
on data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Contextual Factors
Study–Birth Cohort, or ECLS-B, as well as quali- When we started the research initiative that
tative data collected from the parents and teach- inspired this volume, we asserted that the study of
ers of low-income children participating in the poverty and its effects on children needs to con-
Texas state pre-K program, the authors discuss the sider that poverty is best defined along a continuum
sustainability of early intervention programs and that encompasses, but exceeds, the official poverty
call attention to the need for stronger connections threshold, from the underclass through the working
between research and policy. Among their conclu- class. It was important to us that poverty be under-
sions, Crosnoe and his colleagues recommend that stood as a conglomerate of conditions and events;
research should focus on connections across devel- not as a categorical variable and that it needs to be
opmental stages with particular attention to how studied in the context of place, time, and culture,
later experiences build on or dilute early experi- taking into account the variability across and within
ences. Such research can help to inform decisions settings. Section V discusses poverty within these
about the kinds of post–early childhood boosters influential contexts.
that are needed to maximize the long-term effects Part V starts with Mills-Koonce and Towe-
of early childhood interventions. Goodman’s summary of the effects of poverty and
Similarly, Johnson and Brooks-Gunn discuss the poverty-related stressors on hypothalamic-pituitary-
choices and consequences of child care and early adrenal (HPA) axis activity in young children. In
education for low-income families. In chapter 20, chapter 22, they examine the environmental cor-
the authors review issues of access to early care and relates of cortisol in young children, including
education for low-income families, including who the diurnal patterns of baseline levels as well as
uses early care and the publicly funded options that cortisol reactivity and regulation levels of cortisol
exist for these families. This is important because in response to emotional challenge or stress. They
more children are experiencing early education and, examine associations between poverty contexts and
for low-income families, having access to high qual- HPA functioning, as well as potential experiential
ity developmentally appropriate experiences may mediators of these associations, including family
ameliorate the effects of poverty on child outcomes. processes, child care, and broader environmental
Johnson and Brooks-Gunn discuss definitions and variables. The short- and long-term implications of
measurement of quality in early care and education, these associations are discussed, as well as potential
as well as evidence for the effects of early interven- future directions for this research.
tion and early care on children. Ingoldsby and colleagues look in chapter 23 at
Finally, Part IV concludes in chapter 21with the impact of the amounts of time in contexts out-
Gamoran, Turley, and Fiel’s analysis of the extent to side of the family and home. This chapter reviews
which school reform may level the playing field for extant research on key factors that may facilitate or
low-income children and youth. They pay special mitigate risk for child conduct problems in three
attention to what they term achievement inequality extrafamilial contexts: school, after-school, and
and review evidence-based approaches to school neighborhood. They contend that structural or
interventions intended to reduce US achievement organizational features, monitoring and supervision

mah olmes 5
processes, and children’s relationships with adults support the link between poverty, chaos, and chil-
and peers are related to children’s risk of conduct dren’s early development.
problems within and across these settings, with We round out Part V with a discussion on child
robust associations emerging for low-income chil- development and homelessness. The data are scant
dren who experience multiple contextual risks. The regarding the numbers of children and families
authors lay out directions for future research which experiencing homelessness, and there is a dearth
includes longitudinal and developmentally focused of information on the long-term impacts of both
investigations of direct and interactive associations the duration and the different types of home-
among contextual characteristics. They also call for less experiences on children’s development. While
studies of parent involvement in these contexts, as homelessness may not be a permanent condition
well as empirical investigations of the individual and for most homeless families, many children expe-
family factors that may play a role in the prediction rience this state for a substantial portion of their
of children’s conduct problems. young lives (Lewitt & Baker, 1996), and therefore
Extending this line of inquiry, Sastry reviews an understanding of these experiences is critical.
research on neighborhood effects on children’s Chapter 26, by Jung Min Park, aims to extend our
achievement. In chapter 24 he describes studies knowledge of the relationship between homeless-
published in the last 10 years that have examined ness and child outcomes in order to contribute to
the effects of neighborhood characteristics on chil- the development of effective strategies to better
dren’s academic achievement in the United States. serve children and families. Park provides a defini-
He points out that based on a variety of national tion of the various levels and nuanced understand-
and local studies that use a range of data sources ings of homelessness, provides statistics on the
and statistical approaches, there seem to be small number of children and families counted as home-
but clear negative effects of growing up in a poor less, and reviews the relation of homelessness to
neighborhood that are beyond the effects of grow- such child outcomes as physical and mental health,
ing up in a poor family. However, he concludes out-of-home placement, parent-child interactions,
that knowledge of the specific pathways through cognitive development, and educational outcomes.
which neighborhood factors operate to affect chil- Notably, Park examines how homelessness and
dren’s achievement is only beginning to emerge. poverty are intertwined, and discusses the charac-
Much more research is needed to fully understand teristics that are common among homeless families
these pathways and to begin to develop targeted and their children. Lastly, Park discusses directions
interventions. for future research in this area, including the need
In chapter 25, we contrast children’s experiences for further investigation of the independent effect
of poverty in urban versus rural contexts. Vernon- of homelessness on child outcomes, differential ser-
Feagans and colleagues posit that children who live vice needs among subgroups of homeless families,
in poor rural communities have a somewhat differ- both risk and protective factors for child problems,
ent context for development than urban children. and methodologically rigorous intervention stud-
They elaborate on the differences between these ies for children who are homeless or at risk for
communities and indicate that rural in comparison homelessness.
to urban communities have higher poverty rates and We are delighted to conclude this section with
greater isolation from key services, such as schools a review of issues related to American Indian
and health care. Parents in these communities have and Alaska Native children living in poverty. As
more service related jobs with nonstandard work authors Spicer and Sarche point out in chapter 27,
schedules. These factors are associated with poverty American Indian and Alaska Native tribal com-
but also can add additional stress on rural family life munities often confront significant adversity with
that can contribute to more chaotic living condi- inadequate resources, low rates of educational
tions for young children, including disorganization, attainment, disparities in health, and unmet needs
instability, and unpredictability. Vernon-Feagans for access to mental health and other services. The
et al. review the literature and present data to sup- authors discuss the unique historical experiences of
port the view that chaos in rural communities may tribes and cultural values that emphasize interde-
be greater than in urban areas and may be a par- pendence, distributed caregiving, and physical care
ticularly important mediator of the relationship during infancy. These values represent an opportu-
between poverty and children’s development. Data nity for supportive and health promoting policies
are presented from the Family Life Project to further as well as targeted interventions to begin to close

6 i n tro d ucti on
the wide and persistent gaps in income, education, and Bangladesh; public health approaches based
and services. on age-paced parenting newsletter models used in
the United States; primary care–based approaches
Part VI: Helping Families Help Themselves: used in the United States, Turkey, and China; and
Evidence-Based Interventions comprehensive early child development (ECD)
Part VI focuses on evidence-based interventions programs used in the Philippines. Huberman and
designed to address aspects of family function- Mendelsohn point out that while quite different in
ing that may help improve the quality of life and format, duration, and cost, these models share com-
promote healthy child development. We deemed it mon attributes: they all have a strong focus on PCI,
important to look at the variety of ways in which they have the most impact with moderate-risk fami-
interventions targeting key leverage points could lies, and they use participatory and interactive meth-
give families the tools, resources, and skills they ods to engage parents and caregivers. The authors
need to manage their current circumstances and conclude that linking these preventive approaches
ultimately improve the quality of life for themselves with health and other ECD services and integrating
and their children. This part opens in chapter 28 the program into larger systems and infrastructures
with Liliana Lengua’s work on the development are essential steps that must be taken.
of effortful control in children. This is important We were delighted to learn of the broad scope
because effortful control is thought to be an impor- of programming and interventions efforts produced
tant temperament and self-regulatory capacity by the Sesame Workshop. We deemed it important
linked to such child outcomes as prosocial behav- to provide a discussion on a range of applied inter-
ior and school performance (Kochanska, Murray, vention strategies and promising practices targeting
& Harlan, 2000) as well as morality, social com- low-income families to give rise to critical questions
petence, and adjustment (Eisenberg et al., 2004). that might inform more basic research. In chapter
Lengua discusses a model in which greater family 30, Cohen and colleagues give an overview of the
stress associated with poverty results in disruptions Sesame Workshop’s health initiatives that serve low-
in parenting and physiological stress responses that, income families and describe their Healthy Habits
in turn, divert the development of effortful control. for Life (HHFL) initiative. This program provides
Lengua presents evidence for the relations of parent- tools and ideas to families, children, and child care
ing, family stress, maternal depression, and specific providers to establish lifelong habits that support
biomarkers to effortful control, highlighting poten- healthy lifestyles and good nutrition. The authors
tial processes that promote or divert the develop- share evaluation results of the impact of HHFL on
ment of effortful control and of positive adaptation low-income caregivers and young children and how
in young children. She concludes that the pervasive these results help strengthen the effectiveness of the
and long-term effects of poverty on children’s social- materials used in this program.
emotional well-being, academic competence, and Next we address a program targeted specifi-
mental health may be accounted for, in part, by the cally for rural African American youth. In chapter
effects of poverty on children’s developing effortful 31, Brody, Kogan, and Grange discuss the Strong
control. Understanding the effects of poverty on African American Families (SAAF) program—a
effortful control and the potential mechanisms of family-centered intervention for rural youth,
those effects is critical for understanding children’s designed to capitalize on naturally occurring protec-
adjustment and for the development of preventive tive processes that buffer African American youth
or promotive interventions for children growing up from poverty and other hardships that compromise
in poverty. positive development and promote behavior prob-
Next, Huberman and Mendelsohn discuss the lems in rural communities. The authors describe
centrality of parent-child interaction and the home the risk and protective processes forecasting rural
caregiving environment in shaping early child African American youths’ developmental trajecto-
development. In chapter 29 they take a broad, ries as well as the process through which adolescent
multinational view and describe selected Parent- development, ethnic minority status, and the con-
Child Interaction (PCI)–focused approaches across text of rural poverty helped shape the conceptual
a range of intensities that have been found to be and theoretical frameworks for this intervention
effective. These include home visiting models used study.
in the United States and in Jamaica; group visit and In chapter 32, Fernald, Gertler, and Hidrobo
community-based models used in Ethiopia, Brazil, describe the promise of various types of conditional

mah olmes 7
cash transfer (CCT) programs. This intervention a developmental-ecological framework to consider
provides cash payments to families only if they the many ways in which mental health and well-
comply with a set of certain requirements relating being are shaped by the interactions among indi-
to health and education of family members. Fernald vidual, family, community, and societal factors.
et al. discuss the ways in which CCTs could affect Betancourt and Beardslee conclude with a series of
children’s birth, health, and development outcomes. recommendations illustrating the requisite interplay
They review evidence from conditional cash trans- among building the evidence base, increasing politi-
fer programs in Mexico, Brazil, Peru, Honduras, cal will to make change, and improving the imple-
Nicaragua, Colombia, India, Nepal, and Jamaica mentation of high quality and sustainable services
and unconditional cash transfer programs in South for children, youth, and families.
Africa, Malawi, and Ecuador. The authors also In chapter 35, Wessells and Kostelny introduce
examine the effects of CCT programs on factors the concept of everyday distress in their description
that could indirectly affect child outcomes, such as of children’s experiences in humanitarian settings.
growth monitoring and household food purchases. They emphasize that, worldwide, many children
grow up in zones of political violence and armed
Part VII: International Perspectives on conflict, where they are affected not only by acute,
the Mental Health and Psychosocial traumatic events but also by slower, ongoing dis-
Consequences of Poverty tresses of everyday life. Wessells and Kostelny
In Part VII of this volume, we frame a global describe how everyday distresses often stem from
health perspective focusing specifically on the psy- economic and political problems and how they arise
chosocial and mental health consequences of experi- at levels such as individual, family, community, and
encing childhood adversity and humanitarian crises. societal levels. The authors go on to discuss com-
This is important because recent events have called mon sources of distress among war-affected chil-
our attention to children around the world in need dren: inability to meet their basic needs and those
of assistance due to natural disasters, conflict, and of their families, family separation, family violence,
orphanhood due to HIV/AIDS, the spread of dis- lack of access to education, gender-based violence,
ease, parental abandonment, exploitation, and abuse. stigmatization and lack of social acceptance, per-
This need is underscored for children living in low- ceptions of spiritual contamination, community
resource countries and impoverished communities. violence, refugee status, unemployment, and lack of
Having an understanding of the breadth and scope of positive life options. Despite significant impact of
these issues is only one step toward ameliorating their these distresses, Wessells and Kostelny provide com-
effects—but it is an important step nonetheless. pelling examples of how some war-affected children
This final part leads with an overview by Panter- demonstrate significant resilience due largely to
Brick and her colleagues, who lay out a global protective factors in their social environments.
health perspective that challenges westernized views The discussion that follows focuses primarily on
of childhood adversity. In chapter 33 these authors parenting as a means for understanding outcomes for
point out that our conceptual models and bodies children living in low-resourced settings. Lansford
of supporting evidence have tended to be Western- (chapter 36) puts forward the argument that culture
centric. They argue that longitudinal research on and poverty jointly influence parenting. Depending
large, representative samples has mostly been funded on cultural, national, and socioeconomic contexts,
and institutionally facilitated within North America parents’ attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors may differ,
and European countries, and call for more ground- and specific forms of parenting may have different
breaking research outside Western contexts. implications for children’s development. She argues
In chapter 34 Betancourt and Beardslee follow that poverty can make it more difficult for parents
with an explication of their work on the psychoso- to promote children’s survival and development,
cial and developmental consequences of major life protect them from abuse and exploitation, and to
adversity on child and family mental health, with participate in making decisions that affect the lives
particular attention to regions affected by com- of their children.
munal violence and by HIV/AIDS. The authors In the final chapter of Part VII, Singer and Kutlesic
put forward the notion that in both of these con- in chapter 37 call for more evidence-based program-
texts, several forms of family adversity are preva- ming to support and address the mental health and
lent and observed in large proportions of children psychosocial consequences of childhood adver-
and their caregivers. Notably, the authors draw on sity. They posit that humanitarian crises can have

8 i n tro d ucti on
significant psychological consequences in children, of Health, its constituent units or the Department of Health and
especially among those who suffered from depriva- Human Services.
tion and adversity prior to the event. As the interna-
tional community has improved its ability to respond References
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S.
to humanitarian crises, the strategies and practices (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the
for enhancing resilience and preventing psychologi- strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
cal harm have evolved, but there is still more work Belsky, J. (2008). Family influences on psychological develop-
that needs to be done. The authors use the tsunami ment. Psychiatry, 7, 282–285.
of 2004 in Asia as an example of efforts to enhance Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother.
International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39(5), 350–373.
research and develop evidence-based programs. They Eisenberg, N., Smith, C. L., Sadovsky, A., Spinrad, T. L.,
maintain that further progress will be dependent on Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Effortful control:
creating partnerships between scientists and practi- Relations with emotion regulation, adjustment, and socializa-
tioners and developing innovative strategies to inte- tion in childhood. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.),
grate research studies into humanitarian programs. Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications
(pp. 259–282). New York: Guilford Press.
Taken together, the parts in this volume represent Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T., (2000). Effortful
the broad topical areas that we felt were illustrative control in early childhood: Continuity and change, anteced-
of our work since initiating SEED and of the issues ents, and implications for social development. Developmental
most in need of further research and scholarly atten- Psychology, 36(2), 220–232.
tion. We recognize that poverty is a very broad topic Lewitt, E. M., Baker, L. S. (1996). Child indicators: Homeless
families and children. The Future of Children, 6 (2),
with many lines of inquiry to be pursued. There are 146–158.
many directions to be taken and many other aspects Moore, K.A., Kinghorn, A., Bandy, T. (2011). Parental relation-
of poverty and child development that yet need to ship quality and child outcomes across subgroups. Washington,
be addressed. Rosalind King explores these direc- DC: Child Trends.
tions in Chapter 38. We hope that our treatment Moore, K. A., Redd, Z., Burkhauser, M., Mbwana, K., &
Collins, A. (2009). Children in poverty: Trends, consequences,
of this very important subject provokes thought, and policy options. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
provides insight, and gives rise to new perspectives, Slade, A., Grienenberger, J., Bernbach, E., Levy, D., & Locker,
programs and policies that will mitigate against the A. (2005). Maternal reflective functioning and attachment:
effects and ultimately halt the cycle of poverty. Considering the transmission gap. Attachment and Human
Development, 7, 283–292.
Wight, V.R., Chau, M., & Aratani, Y. (2011). Who are America’s
Note poor children? The official story. New York: National Center
The views expressed in this paper are solely those expressed by for Children in Poverty, Columbia University, Mailman
the author and do not reflect the views of the National Institutes School of Public Health.

mah olmes 9
This page intentionally left blank
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
A PRAYER

O Lord, our Father, hear us now,


While on our bended knees we bow;
Look down, O Lord, in tender love,
Prepare us all to meet above.

O Lord, our Father, hear us pray,


Watch over us from day to day;
Hear us in our humble prayer,
O keep us safely in Thy care.

O help us, Lord, to pray aright,


And keep us holy in Thy sight;
Protect us with Thy mighty arm
And keep us from temptation’s harm.

Bless and make us pure within,


Wash us, cleanse us free from sin;
Protect us with Thy mighty hand,
Prepare us for the promised land.

O Lord, come down in mighty power,


Revive us all this very hour;
O lift us from this pit of mire,
And fill our souls with heavenly fire.

Come with love’s refreshing showers,


And kindle these cold hearts of ours;
O guide us in the narrow path,
Lord save us from Thy coming wrath.

And when we leave this world of strife


O give us all eternal life;
Arm us, Lord, with wings of love,
To leave this world and fly above.

Into Thy care, O Lord, we leave,


In peace, O Lord, our souls receive;
We ask it all, O Lord, we may,
Through Him Who taught us all to say:

Our Father, Who art in heaven, we pray,


Hallowed be Thy name this day;
Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done,
In earth and up in heaven as one.

Give us this day our daily bread,


’Tis from Thy bounties all are fed;
Our trespasses, O Lord, forgive,
As we our trespassers forgive.

Dear Lord, with tempters leave us not,


Deliver us from evil’s plot;
Thy name shall have the glory then,
Forever and for aye. Amen.
IN MEMORIAM[2]

My bosom swells with fervent grief,


My heart aches to its core,
See him struggling, he is dying,
Our Walter is no more!

* * * * *

When we laid him ’neath the turf


In the cold, cold ground,
A cloud of darkness seemed to rise
Which covered all around.

But when I looked up at the stars,


Beyond the heavenly dome,
There with loving outstretched arms
Angels welcomed Walter home!

Farewell, Walter, farewell darling,


Life is but a barren strand,
Soon we’ll meet thee, happy child,
In that far-off happy land!

2. Verses written upon the death of J. Walter Kayhart, son of Lemuel and
Mary Kayhart, who died August 15th, 1875.
IN MEMORIAM[3]

Now I lay me down to rest,


While the sun is in the west;
When the stars all brightly shine,
If it be the will of Thine,
Watch and guard me, Lord, I pray,
Through the night as through the day;
Guard me, Lord, Thou knowest best,
While I lay me down to rest.

Now I lay me down to rest,


Parting friends my lips have pressed;
Farewell, kindred here below,
Jesus calls me, I must go.
Not my will but Thine be done;
When my earthly race is run,
And life’s sun sinks in the west,
Calmly lay me down to rest.

Now I lay me down to rest,


Help me, Lord, to stand the test;
When I’m laid upon the bier,
In the grave there’ll be no fear.
When these throbbing pulses cease,
When with God I’ve made my peace,
Closely in the cold earth pressed,
Calmly lay me down to rest.

Now I lay me down to rest,


May my soul be doubly blest;
Though my flesh and bones decay,
’Neath the earth’s cold clods of clay,
My soul will rise on wings of love,
To dwell with Him in heaven above;
Sweetly there, on Jesus’ breast,
I will lay me down to rest.
3. Written upon the death of Elijah Kayhart, father of Lemuel Kayhart, who
died January 16th, 1906.
IN MEMORIAM[4]

Farewell, dear Willie, darling one—


Thy will, O Lord, Thy will be done;
’Tis Jesus calls thee to thy rest,
To live with Him among the blest.

While in the grave we lay him low,


The tears of grief unbidden flow;
Though sobbing hearts with grief may swell,
Our Father doeth all things well.

Though ’neath the ground we lay him low,


His spirit up to God will go,
On angels’ pinions borne away,
Our darling lives in endless day.

A few more years may fleet away,


When we no more on earth may stay;
We’ll bid this dreary world adieu,
And soar beyond bright heaven’s blue.

Beyond cold Jordan’s swelling tide,


Beyond grim death’s dark valley wide—
Safe in the tender Shepherd’s care,
We soon shall meet our darling there.

Beyond this world of woe and care,


In yonder city bright and fair,
Crowned with jewels rich and rare,
We’ll meet our little darling there.

See him as he beckoning stands,


Calling us with outstretched hands,
To guide us on our weary way,
To realms of bliss in endless day.

Safely there on Jesus’ breast,


Forever he will be at rest;
In yon blue heaven, bright and fair,
We’ll meet our darling Willie there.

4. Written upon the death of William H. H., son of Winfield S. and Sarah A.
Kayhart.
IN MEMORIAM[5]

How can we part, oh, dearest son,


Our treasure ever blest?
With tears of grief we lay thee down
In earth’s cold couch to rest.

Though we may travel this broad earth


And search it far and wide,
Thy presence here beside the hearth
Can never be supplied.

Dearest friends on earth must sever,


We only sojourn here;
Then let us live to live forever
And meet grim death with cheer!

Farewell, farewell, dear child at rest,


Thy troubles are all o’er,
God grant thee peace among the blest,
Beyond cold Jordan’s shore.

5. In memory of Edgar S. Class, son of John and Elizabeth Class.

THE ABBEY PRINTSHOP, EAST ORANGE, N. J.


TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
1. Silently corrected obvious typographical errors and
variations in spelling.
2. Retained archaic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings
as printed.
3. Re-indexed footnotes using numbers and collected
together at the end of each poem.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CHILDHOOD'S
HAPPY HOME, AND OTHER VERSES ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions


will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.


copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright
in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and without
paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General
Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and
distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if
you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the
trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the
Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such
as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and
printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in
the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright
law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE


THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the


free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this
work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase
“Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of
the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or
online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and


Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand,
agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to
abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using
and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for
obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms
of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only


be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by
people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
There are a few things that you can do with most Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There
are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™
electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and
help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright
law in the United States and you are located in the United
States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying,
distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project
Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will
support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project
Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms
of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with
its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project


Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other


immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project
Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United


States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United
States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is


derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to
anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges.
If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of
paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use
of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth
in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is


posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder.
Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™
License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright
holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project


Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files
containing a part of this work or any other work associated with
Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,


performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or


providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who


notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of


any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project


Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend


considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -


Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If


you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set


forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied


warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the


Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of


Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the


assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project


Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500


West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to


the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws


regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states


where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot


make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current


donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project


Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and

You might also like