2018 Final Parks Recreation Master Plan (Web Version)

District of Summerland
Parks & Recreation

Master Plan
Final Master Plan
June 20, 2018

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This Master Plan was developed under the guidance of a project Steering Committee.
Steering Committee
Chris Becker, Parks and Recreation Commission

Brian Christopherson, Parks and Recreation Commission
Donna Eaton, Parks and Recreation Commission
Jerry Flaman, Parks and Recreation Commission
Sandy Mah, Parks and Recreation Commission
Mark Siemens, Parks and Recreation Commission
Lori Mullin, District of Summerland
Laura McCarron, District of Summerland
Consulting Team
Erik Lees, LEES+Associates

John Kirbyson, LEES+Associates
Deborah Herbert, LEES+Associates
Public phone survey and online survey by the Mustel Group.
District of Summerland Council and staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission also made
significant contributions to this Master Plan, as did Alison Peatt, SOSCP Environmental Planner,
providing environmental planning support services to SOSCP local government partners.
Thank you also to members of the public and stakeholder groups who participated in the development
of this Master Plan by taking part in the phone survey, responding to online questionnaires, providing
background information, and attending meetings and public open houses.
District of Summerland Parks + Recreation Master Plan | 06.2018
3
Executive Summary...........................................................................................i
Table of Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................. 1

1.1 Overview and Purpose of Master Plan....................................................................................2
1.2 Process......................................................................................................................................3
1.3 Summerland Community Profile.............................................................................................4
1.4 Summerland’s Community Values...........................................................................................6
1.5 Summerland’s Strategic Plan....................................................................................................7
1.6 Trends and a Recreation Framework.......................................................................................8
2 Community Engagement.................................................................... 13
2.1 Overview of Engagement Undertaken for Project............................................................... 13
2.2 Initial Engagement Results.................................................................................................... 14
2.3 Community Feedback on the Draft Master Plan.................................................................. 16
3 Summerland’s Parks and Recreation System................................... 19

3.1 Vision and Principles.............................................................................................................. 19
3.2 Arts and Culture Connection................................................................................................. 20
3.3 Environmental Values............................................................................................................ 23
3.4 Climate Change...................................................................................................................... 23
4 Parks....................................................................................................... 27
4.1 Park System............................................................................................................................ 27
4.2 Summerland’s Parks.............................................................................................................. 45
4.3 Park Amenities....................................................................................................................... 52
4.4 Maintenance.......................................................................................................................... 67
5 Trails........................................................................................................ 69
5.1 Trails Provision....................................................................................................................... 70
5.2 Key Issues............................................................................................................................... 72
5.3 Trail User Groups................................................................................................................... 76
5.4 Key Findings and Recommendations.................................................................................... 77
6 Recreation Facilities................................................................................. 79
6.1 Description and Assessment of Indoor Recreation Facilities.....................................................79
6.2 Indoor Facility Supply..................................................................................................................90
7 Recreation Programming........................................................................ 99
7.1 Existing Programming Summary.................................................................................................99
7.2 Analysis and Trends...................................................................................................................103
7.3 Environmental Education Programming...................................................................................109
7.4 Tourism.......................................................................................................................................109
7.5 Recommendations....................................................................................................................112
8 Service Delivery...................................................................................... 115

8.1 Financial Review........................................................................................................................115
8.2 Review of Policies and Procedures...........................................................................................119
9 Implementation Plan.............................................................................. 123

9.1 Funding Strategies.....................................................................................................................123
9.2 Monitoring and Evaluation........................................................................................................126
9.3 Implementation Plan Table.......................................................................................................126
Appendix A – Engagement Activities.................................................................. .141
Appendix B – Survey Summary.............................................................................. 144
Appendix C – Youth Engagement Summary....................................................... 180
Appendix D – Open House #1 Feedback............................................................ 184
Appendix E – Community Feedback on Draft Master Plan............................... 189
Appendix F – Environmental Values...................................................................... 199
Appendix G – Summerland’s Community Climate Action Plan....................... 210
Appendix H – Summerland’s Parks........................................................................ 213
Appendix I – Places for Dogs.................................................................................. 221
Appendix J – Summerland's Most Prominent Trails............................................. 225
Appendix K – References........................................................................................ 227

Table of Contents
Tables
Table 1: Summerland Population: 2016 and 2028............................................................................... 6
Table 2: Recreation Trends.................................................................................................................... 9
Table 3: Survey Feedback on Draft Recommendations..................................................................... 17
Table 4: Summerland Park Classification............................................................................................ 29
Table 5: Recommended and Previous Parks Classifications.............................................................. 30
Table 6: Parkland per 1000 Residents................................................................................................. 31
Table 7: Summerland’s Parkland – Summary..................................................................................... 32
Table 8: Summerland’s Developed Parkland Provision – Current and Future.................................. 33
Table 9: Parks Provision by Type of Park – Selected BC Municipalities............................................. 33
Table 10: Summerland’s Developed Parkland Provision.................................................................... 41
Table 11: Summerland’s Parks............................................................................................................ 46
Table 12: Sports Amenities................................................................................................................. 55
Table 13: Comparison of Provision of Public Outdoor Tennis and Pickleball Courts........................ 59
Table 14: Estimated Tennis Demand.................................................................................................. 59
Table 15: Dog Parks in Selected Okanagan Communities................................................................. 63
Table 16: Trails Comparison................................................................................................................ 70
Table 17: Summerland Aquatic and Fitness Centre.......................................................................... 83
Table 18: Summerland Aquatic and Fitness Centre – Strengths and Weaknesses.......................... 84
Table 19: Summerland Arena Complex and Curling Club.................................................................. 87
Table 20: Summerland Arena Complex and Curling Club – Strengths and Weaknesses................. 88
Table 21: Comparison of Indoor Recreation Facility Supply by Population...................................... 91
Table 22: Reasons for Using Private Indoor Facilities or Those in Located in Other Cities............. 116
Table 23: ndoor Recreation Facilities/Programs that are Lacking or In Need of Improvement..... 116
Table 24: Expenditures on Parks and Recreation............................................................................. 116
Table 25: Comparison of Recreational Swim Admission Rates....................................................... 117
Table 26: Comparison of Recreational Skating Admission Rates.................................................... 117
Table 27: Comparison of Arena Rental Rates................................................................................... 118
Table 28: Implementation Table....................................................................................................... 126
Table F1: Species at Risk In or Near Summerland............................................................................ 203
Figures
Figure 1: Process Used To Develop the Parks and Recreation Master Plan........................................ 3
Figure 2: Population in 2016: Summerland and British Columbia Overall......................................... 5
Figure 3: Summerland Population by Age Group, 2011 and 2016...................................................... 5
Figure 4: Summerland Strategic Plan’s Balanced Scorecard................................................................ 7
Figure 5: A Framework for Recreation in Canada 2015: Pathways to Wellbeing............................. 11
Figure 6: Dots Allocated Among Priorities By Open House Participants.......................................... 17
Figure 7: Community Priorities........................................................................................................... 18
Figure 8: 400m and 800m Buffers Around Summerland’s Parks....................................................... 36
Figure 9: Frequency of Using Summerland’s Parks, Trails and Open Spaces.................................... 37
Figure 10: Recreation or Cultural Activities Participated In on a Regular Basis................................ 38
Figure 11: Assessment of Summerland’s Parks, Trails and Open Spaces.......................................... 39
Figure 12: Summerland’s Parks........................................................................................................... 48
Figure 13: Summerland Playgrounds with 800 m Buffers................................................................. 54
Figure 14: Summerland’s Trails (preliminary)..................................................................................... 71
Figure 15: Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities Used......................................................... 81
Figure 16: Frequency of Use of Indoor Facilities................................................................................ 81
Figure 17: Satisfaction with Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities...................................... 82
Figure 18: Use of Private Indoor Facilities or Those in Located in Other Cities................................ 92
Figure E1: Dots Allocated to Priorities by Open House Participants............................................... 196
Figure E2: Dots Allocated to Priorities by Open House Participants............................................... 196
Figure E3: Rankings of Parks, Trails and Outdoor Recreation Priorities by Survey Respondents.. 197
Figure E4: Rankings of Indoor Recreation and Recreation Programming Priorities....................... 198
Figure F1: Summerland Environmentally Sensitive Areas and District of Summerland Parks....... 203
Executive Summary
Executive
Summary
Home to approximately 11,600 residents, the District of Summerland is
located on the west shore of Okanagan Lake, nestled between Giant’s
Head, Conkle and Cartwright Mountains. Summerland has numerous
parks and trails, including in the surrounding mountains, as well as
an aging but well-maintained arena and aquatic centre. While the
population is older than average for British Columbia, many residents
actively use Summerland’s parks, trails and recreation facilities, and
healthy living and wellness are important parts of the community’s
character.
This Parks and Recreation Master Plan provides strategic direction to

the District of Summerland regarding park use, facilities and services
over the next five to ten years. Developed collaboratively through
ongoing consultation with District staff, Council, a Steering Committee,
stakeholders and the public, the Master Plan sets clear directives to
guide policy development and decision making.
VISION AND PRINCIPLES

The following vision and principles set the stage for the Master Plan by
establishing a framework for a set of high-level goals that will be the
touchstone for evaluation of parks and recreation plans and priorities
in the coming years.
VISION
Summerland’s parks and recreation system contributes to a high quality

of life for residents and visitors by providing accessible, inclusive and
engaging indoor and outdoor recreation opportunities that reflect
Summerland’s distinctive natural setting, healthy and active lifestyles,
flourishing artistic and cultural communities, and close-knit, small-town
character.
i
PRINCIPLES
• Parks and recreation facilities are accessible, affordable and

inclusive to people of all ages, abilities and income levels.
• Residents are inspired and actively engaged in a healthy lifestyle.
• Residents of all ages have pride in the community and a strong

sense of belonging.
• Parks, recreation and community facilities are linked through a

network of greenways, walkways and trails.
• Parks, trails, and recreation facilities and programs attract new

residents, encourage tourism and stimulate the economy.
• Summerland’s history and culture are celebrated.
• Education, interpretation and health promotion are important.
• Partnerships are encouraged and supported to deliver a wide

range of parks and recreation amenities, services and programs.
• The environment is respected, protected, enhanced and

contributes to the quality of life in the community.
• Staff, volunteers, visitors and partners are valued.
PARKS
PARKLAND PROVISION
Summerland has considerably more total parkland than similar sized BC

communities on average. Giant’s Head Mountain and Conkle Mountain,
large natural areas, account for more than 70% of Summerland’s
parkland, and Summerland’s provision of city, community and
neighbourhood parks is below the provincial average and falls at the
low end of the range compared to nearby municipalities.
ii
Executive Summary
Much of Summerland lies within a 10-minute walk of a park (800 meters)

and is well-served. The exceptions are the western part of Trout Creek
and Happy Valley, which are underserved in neighborhood park space.
In addition, the Sinclair-Barclay neighbourhood just west of Downtown
is an urban neighbourhood with many families and does not have a
neighbourhood park within walking distance.
As a tourist destination, Summerland’s parks are used by both residents

and tourists in the summer months, particularly the public beaches,
Memorial Park, Giant’s Head Mountain and Conkle Mountain.
This Master Plan provides a parks classification scheme and

recommended standards for parkland provision (see table at the end
of this section).
SUMMERLAND’S PARKS
Summerland has a variety of excellent parks, which include several

lakeshore parks with beaches, the Dale Meadows Park and Living
Memorial Park sports fields, the centrally-located Memorial Park,
several neighbourhood parks, several natural areas with passive
recreation opportunities, and special purpose parks like Peach Orchard
Campground, Rodeo Grounds and Priest Camp.
This Master Plan provides an inventory of Summerland’s parks and

makes several recommendations for parks improvements, based on site
analysis and community and staff engagement (see table at the end of
this section).
PARK AMENITIES
Playgrounds
Summerland has ten playgrounds, which are well-maintained and

inspected regularly. Some areas of Summerland are within a ten-minute
walk (800 m) of a playground, but others are not, including the western
and southern parts of Lower Town, the western part of Trout Creek and
Happy Valley.
Outdoor Sports Amenities
Summerland is well-served for outdoor sports amenities and the sports

fields are well-used.
iii
Summerland is well-served for the number of public tennis courts,

but use of these courts is low because they are not well-maintained.
Summerland is relatively under-served for pickleball courts; pickleball
players would like additional outdoor courts as well as indoor courts.
Summerland has outdoor basketball courts at Dale Meadows Park and

Summerland Middle School. A new skatepark is under construction at
the southwest corner of Jubilee Road and Rosedale Avenue. Summerland
has one waterpark at Peach Orchard Beach Park.
Places for Dogs
Summerland has fewer off-leash dog parks than selected other

communities in the Okanagan, including smaller communities like
Peachland and Osoyoos. The community feels there is a need for
additional off-leash dog park areas; provision of a new off-leash dog
park in a park/field setting could help keep dogs off sports fields.
Beaches and Water Access
Summerland has public beaches, piers and walkways to provide public

access to the waterfront. Lakeshore access is a priority for Summerland
and Summerland’s Official Community Plan notes the policy of acquiring
land adjacent to Okanagan Lake to increase public access to the
waterfront.
Trees
Trees offer significant environmental and human health benefits. An

Urban Forest Strategy would assist Summerland in identification of
areas where trees could be planted, selection of tree species and care
of existing trees. Funds available through environmental grant programs
and from the District’s Tree Fund Reserve account could be used to plant
additional trees along streets and in parks. It is important to conduct
hazard tree assessments in Summerland’s parks and along trails.
PARKS MAINTENANCE
Summerland’s parks are well-maintained, and staff utilize current

resources effectively. Challenges for parks maintenance include
aging equipment and low enforcement of parks bylaws such as the
prohibition of dogs on sports fields. An additional seasonal landscaping
crew member would allow the crew to maintain high standards for
landscaping.
iv
Executive Summary
Regular communication with sports field users and development

of guidelines would support field maintenance. Service clubs and
community organizations have historically donated a lot of Summerland’s
parks infrastructure, and standards are needed to ensure that donated
infrastructure meets safety standards and can be maintained by District
staff. The separation of parks responsibilities between the Works &
Utilities and Recreation departments makes it important to have regular
contact and collaboration between the two departments on work
planning, budget development, and priority-setting for parks.
TRAILS
Walking is the most popular recreation activity of Summerland
residents, followed closely by cycling, and Summerland’s many trails
are widely used by residents and visitors. Residents would like to have
a more walkable community with trail links throughout the community,
especially for connections from Upper Town to Lower Town beaches.
There is also a desire to see a commuter bike route to Penticton.
Summerland’s network of mountain bike trails is growing in popularity,

resulting in Summerland becoming a destination for the growing sport.
Its appealing terrain can support further expansion of the sport. The
District also hosts several cycle events including the Mountain Bike
Test of Humanity Championship and Gran Fondo, which also provide
significant tourism benefits.
Trail users identified a pressing need for improved wayfinding, promotion

of trails, and clarity on permitted uses. Conflicts among different trail
users is not a serious problem in Summerland, but clarity on permitted
uses will help avoid potential conflicts.
Trail users can have negative impacts on natural areas, so recreation and
trails in natural areas should be carefully planned to avoid and minimize
impacts on ecologically sensitive or significant habitats, plants or animals.
Trail users identified a need for management planning of natural areas,
similar to the planning that is under way for Giant’s Head Mountain.
The importance of connectivity was identified in engagement with

staff and the community for this Master Plan and is in discussed in
Summerland’s Official Community Plan, Strategic Plan, and Cultural Plan.
Connectivity facilitates active transportation and can provide corridors
for wildlife to move between natural areas.
v
The District of Summerland intends to undertake a Trails Master Plan,

so this Parks and Recreation Master Plan provides a high-level review
and recommendations for Summerland’s trails (see table at the end of
this section), in anticipation of a more thorough Trails Master Plan in
the future.
INDOOR FACILITIES
A comparative analysis indicates that Summerland’s provision of indoor
recreation facilities is on par with similar sized BC communities. The
District of Summerland directly operates two core recreation amenities:
the Summerland Aquatic and Fitness Centre and the Summerland Arena
and Curling Club.
The District also works with community groups to operate more

specialized recreation facilities. These specialized recreation facilities
are spread across the community and without strong operational links,
community recreation demands are not being fully met.
Indoor recreation facilities in nearby neighbouring cities help meet

community demand.
There is very strong public support for improvements to indoor facilities.

With the exception of the school facilities and the Baptist Church, all
indoor recreation facilities are aging and currently operating near full
capacity.
Lack of a District-operated gymnasium and multi-purpose rooms are

noted as hampering delivery of recreation programs. The community
survey highlights that a significant number of residents feel that there
is a lack of indoor recreational facilities and programs which is resulting
in residents using facilities in other communities.
This Master Plan makes several recommendations for Summerland’s

indoor recreation facilities (see table at the end of this section).
SUMMERLAND AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTRE
At 42 years old, the Aquatic and Fitness Centre facility is nearing the end
of its serviceable life. The pool and fitness rooms are used to capacity
during all prime time hours. Key programs such as aquafit, swim lessons
and Recope are full with waiting lists for future programs. While overall
community satisfaction is currently high, there is an expressed desire
for improvements in the aquatic facilities and programs.
vi
Executive Summary
The pool is a traditional single tank design which is outdated and lacks
many of the modern features and amenities such as family changerooms,
family leisure space, shallow teaching pool, accessible entry and swim
competition space. The weightroom has to be used for fitness classes,
which is not conducive to either use.
The Aquatic and Fitness Centre lacks the support space typical of
modern recreation complexes including multi-use recreation rooms,
fitness rooms and gymnasium, which helps create the one-stop centre
for everyone in the community. Due to limited space on school board
property, there is no potential to expand or rebuild a suitably sized
community centre at its current location
SUMMERLAND ARENA AND CURLING CLUB
At 41 years old, the facility is nearing the end of its serviceable life.
The arena ice facility is currently meeting most of the needs of the
community. Prime time ice time is presently near capacity. Survey
respondents did express some interest in expansion and updating the
facility.
Eventually a second sheet of ice may be required to meet community

demands.
RECREATION PROGRAMMING
The community engagement process indicated a desire for more aquatic
and recreation programs for various age groups, especially families
and children, as well as expanded operating hours for fitness classes.
This will be a challenge for staff based on current budget allocations,
staffing levels, and limited indoor facilities. The demand for increased
programming in limited facilities operating at capacity particularly in
peak times highlights a need for a review of the allocation policies and
fees and charges bylaw.
Recreation programming is being delivered by a combination of direct

delivery and by non-profit associations and clubs. With limited staff
capacity, growth in service will depend on partnerships and community
engagement. This “Community Development Model”, in which the
District does not directly provide all recreation services but rather
supports the community to become a partner in meeting community
needs, will require the District to adopt more of a facilitator role, working
with associations to directly encourage and promote more programming.
vii
The need to reach the demographics that are not users of the programs
or facilities, as well as optimizing participation of existing patrons, could
be addressed through a Marketing Plan and Strategy.
This Master Plan makes several recommendations for recreation

programming in Summerland (see table at the end of this section).
CHILDREN
Swimming, going to the beach, ice sports and walking/biking/hiking

combined are the most common activities for families with children.
There are limited recreation programs in Summerland for children and
young families, and the community engagement process indicated a
desire for both more programs and expanded indoor facilities, including
the pool and arena.
The Recreation Department can play a stronger facilitating role for

families by supporting community partners in offering a broad range of
programs and services.
YOUTH
Young teens use recreational facilities to a limited extent, while older

teens rarely use the District’s recreation facilities or programs. Youth
recreation opportunities are minimal and youth expressed a desire for
more options for things to do during the year, as well as more festivals,
events, and concerts.
ADULTS
Walking, going to the theatre, biking, going to the beach and watersports
are the most common recreational activities for adults. Lack of time
and physical limitations are the prime reasons for not participating in
recreation, followed by lack of facilities. Residents are going outside
the community for recreational activities, and there is a strong desire
for improved indoor facilities and increased programs in Summerland.
SENIORS
Seniors aquatic and rehab programs are very well attended. There is an
opportunity for more partnership activities with the Summerland Drop
In Recreation Centre.
viii
Executive Summary
TOURISM
Tourism helps build amenities and supports events for the community.
With improved or additional facilities there is an opportunity to expand
sports tourism. The Chamber of Commerce and some residents feel
that a lack of campgrounds, the quality of Peach Orchard Campground
and the lack of moderately priced accommodations negatively affect
tourism.
There is a history of strong support from service groups for festivals and
events, but some residents and the Chamber express concern about
a decrease in the number of festivals and events over time and some
event organizers express concern about the decrease in volunteers.
With limited capacity, the role of the Recreation Department in tourism-

related activities needs to be defined.
SERVICE DELIVERY
FINANCIAL REVIEW
In 2017, net expenditures on Parks and Recreation were 11% of total

District operating expenditures and the net cost of Parks and Recreation
was $312.86 per household or $132.93 per person. Summerland’s
recovery rate for spending on Parks and Recreation was 34% in 2017;
this is comparable to other smaller municipalities.
Overall Summerland’s admission fees and arena rental rates are lower
that the regional average. The subsidy levels for various age categories
are consistent with the comparable communities and current recreation
trends.
Cost of programs and services is an important consideration for

residents. There appears to be public support for a combination of an
increase in user fees and taxes for increased services.
REVIEW OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Parks and Recreation Commission Bylaw 2000-057
The designation of Commission is usually reserved for governing bodies

with greater autonomy and authority than expressed in the current
bylaw. Since the Commission has no direct budgeting authority, a review
ix
of the title and terms of reference is warranted to bring it in alignment

with other committees of Council.
Acknowledging the unique and special needs of seniors and youth would
broaden the perspective.
Historically, meetings have not been held regularly. There is much work
to be done by the Commission in order assist with the implementation
of this Master Plan.
Parks Regulation Bylaw 95-013
This bylaw regulates the use of all public parks, beaches and municipal
property. The bylaw is generally satisfactory to protect municipal
property and the public, with some exceptions, including:
• Inconsistent authority for administering the bylaw;
• Potential inconsistency with respect to Peach Orchard

Campground and the Rodeo Grounds (the bylaw states parks are
closed from 11:00 PM to 6:00 AM);
• Exclusion of bikes from parks;
• Exclusion of dogs from parks except the off-leash park and

seasonally in Peach Orchard Park; and
• Permitting skateboarding in all parks and public places

(frequently, municipal jurisdictions limit skateboarding to
designated areas to ensure public safety).
Joint Use Agreement with School District 67
A joint use agreement is a mutually beneficial agreement between a

municipality and the local school district, to ensure the shared, equitable
use of both municipal and school facilities. There is a history of a good
working relationship between District of Summerland staff and School
District 67. There is a 1983 joint use agreement for operation of the pool
and a 1987 agreement (bylaw 2128) for the community theatre, both
on School District property, but there is no valid, current and reciprocal
joint use agreement with the School District.
x
Executive Summary
RECOMMENDATIONS
Climate Change
Explore opportunities for using the District’s green revolving fund to finance further investments in
3-1
energy efficiency and GHG emission reductions in District recreation facilities and parks.
Ensure that remediated or new lakeshore parks and trail areas take into account projected future
3-2 flooding under climate change and reflects best practices for construction in riparian areas as well as
protection and enhancement of riparian ecosystems.
Ensure that parks and recreation infrastructure is incorporated into asset management, including
3-3
recognition of its environmental and social benefits.
Continue to improve pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, including creation of additional multi-use
3-4
trails that are connected to existing trail networks.
Consider placing combined recycling/waste bins in parks, at trailheads, and outside of the arena and
3-5
aquatic centre.
Ensure any new District buildings are at least 25% more energy efficient than what would be required
3-6
under the BC Building Code.
Consider planting more trees along streets and parking lots and in parks, in the context of an Urban
3-7
Forest Strategy.
Explore the potential to claim Avoided Forest Conversion credits for forested land that was dedicated as
3-8
new park land after September, 2007.
Park System
4-1 Adopt the recommended parks classification scheme.

Adopt recommended park supply standards:
4-2 • 0.5 ha/1,000 residents for neighbourhood parks, and
• 2.2 ha/1,000 residents for community and city parks
Ensure that new developments include adequate parks and open space to meet the needs of new
residents:
4-3
• All residents within a 5-10 minute walk of a park, and
• At least 2.7 hectares of developed parkland for every 1,000 new residents
Develop a Parkland Acquisition and Improvement Program that targets the recommended park supply
4-4 standards and identifies priorities and requirements for Parkland Acquisition and Improvements. Update
the DCC Bylaw to reflect the Parkland Acquisition and Improvement Program.
Acquire and develop neighbourhood parks, particularly in western Trout Creek, Happy Valley and the
4-5
Sinclair-Barclay neighbourhood west of Downtown.
4-6 Develop a parks natural features/areas management strategy.
Prepare a comprehensive inventory of District parkland including parcel sizes, designation in OCP,
4-7 zoning, whether dedicated or not, history and intended uses. Ensure that both existing and new parks
are properly dedicated and documented as they are added to the inventory.
xi
RECOMMENDATIONS
Summerland's Parks
Use flood remediation in lakeshore parks as opportunity to improve amenities and accessibility as well
4-8
as resilience to future flood events.
4-9 Upgrade washrooms in Gordon Beggs Rotary Beach Park and Peach Orchard Campground.
Explore the cost & feasibility of upgrading and winterizing washrooms at Peach Orchard Beach Park and
4-10
Memorial Park.
4-11 Undertake park master plan/visioning for Memorial Park.
4-12 Repair roof and enclose stage of bandshell in Memorial Park.
Add more play equipment such as a slide and sun shelter (pergola) to the picnic area along the walkway
4-13
in Gordon Beggs Rotary Beach Park.
4-14 Investigate the feasibility of making Dog Beach accessible to people with mobility challenges.
4-15 Explore opportunities to expand the boat launch parking lot adjacent to Peach Orchard Beach Park.
4-16 Explore a long distance designated swim lane from Peach Orchard Park to Rotary Beach.
4-17 Undertake conceptual planning for Peach Orchard Beach Park.
4-18 Undertake improvements to Powell Beach Park.
4-19 Pave Dale Meadows Park parking lot using a permeable surface or other eco-friendly solution.
4-20 Consider building a change room/clubhouse facility at Dale Meadows in partnership with sports clubs.
To improve turf management on sports fields, purchase a reel mower once the parking lot at Dale
4-21
Meadows Park has been resurfaced.
4-22 Resurface the perimeter track at Dale Meadows Park.
Improve communication and coordination with user groups, including hosting an annual meeting each
4-23
spring with District staff and sports field user group representatives.
4-24 Explore whether Deer Ridge Park can or should be transformed into a neighbourhood park.
4-25 Explore whether Dunham Park can or should be transformed into a neighbourhood park.
4-26 Undertake master planning for Conkle Mountain Park.
4-27 Prohibit recreation access to Woodbridge Nature Preserve, except at the property perimeter.
4-28 Explore possibilities for community off-season use of Peach Orchard Campground.
Undertake a park master plan for the Rodeo Grounds, exploring community needs and possible uses for
4-29
the site, servicing requirements and costs, and possible operating arrangements.
Implement the recommendations of the Downtown Strategic Plan to create a central gathering place in
4-30
the Downtown core and enhance public open space.
Explore other opportunities for permanent or temporary public plazas/gathering spaces in the
4-31
downtown area, in collaboration with Chamber of Commerce, School District, and churches.
xii
Executive Summary
RECOMMENDATIONS
Summerland's Parks, continued
4-32 Enhance the public gathering space in Memorial Park.

When building new buildings/washrooms/facilities or undertaking major renovations, consider
4-33
opportunities to increase energy efficiency, install solar panels, and rainwater collection.
4-34 Assess the accessibility of all District of Summerland-owned outdoor public washrooms.
Playgrounds
Replace the playgrounds in Memorial Park, Peach Orchard Beach Park and Peach Orchard Campground
4-35
as planned.
4-36 Replace playgrounds in other parks as needed.
Create new playgrounds, including natural playgrounds, in areas that are not currently within
4-37 10-minutes of walk of a playground (western and southern parts of Lower Town, the western part of
Trout Creek and Happy Valley).
Additional sports fields are not needed currently, but the District should monitor over time to determine
4-38
whether community needs are continuing to be met with existing fields.
4-39 Assess the Powell Beach tennis courts and undertake any needed repairs.
4-40 Work with the School District to rehabilitate the tennis courts at Summerland Secondary School.
4-41 Convert the 2 dedicated pickleball courts at Peach Orchard Campground to 4 courts.
Once the tennis courts at the Summerland Secondary School have been rehabilitated, convert the
4-42
shared tennis-pickleball court at Peach Orchard Campground to dedicated pickleball courts.
Explore possibilities for a long-term dedicated site for outdoor pickleball that would permit expansion
4-43
over time as the number of pickleball players grows.
Places for Dogs
4-44 Identify and explore options for one or more full-time, year-round off-leash dog parks.
4-45 Apply planning principles to identifying and planning spaces for dogs.
Explore options for allowing dogs off-leash in designated areas of parks during certain times of day or
4-46 months of the year. Possibilities might include Peach Orchard Campground, the Rodeo Grounds and
Powell Beach Park.
Explore the feasibility of making Dog Beach accessible to people with mobility challenges. If the required
4-47 construction is permissible in the riparian zone and the cost is reasonable for the District to incur, the
project should be included in the capital budget for the next 1-3 years.
4-48 Provide garbage cans, dog waste bags and signage in parks and at trailheads where dogs are permitted.
Revise the Dog Regulation And Impounding Bylaw (96-002) to permit dogs on leash in all parks except
4-49 on sports fields, playgrounds, spray parks, skate parks, and beaches or at events unless specifically
permitted by the event organizer.
xiii
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursue opportunities to acquire land adjacent to Okanagan Lake to increase public access to the
4-50
waterfront.
Continue to uphold the Lower Town Development Permit Area guidelines that provide for public access
4-51 to the shoreline and for increased commercial or public opportunities for recreational activities along
the shoreline.
Trees
4-52 Develop an Urban Forest Strategy.

Plant trees along streets and in parks. Environmental grant programs and the District’s Tree Fund
4-53
Reserve account could be sources of funding.
Undertake hazard tree assessments in District parks and along trails. Hazard tree assessments should be
4-54
done in the context of the Urban Forest Strategy, once it is available.
Maintenance
4-55 Consider hiring additional landscaping staff.

4-56 Purchase a top-dresser as budgeted for 2018.
Ensure there is regular communication between parks maintenance staff and sports field users. Consider
4-57
developing guidelines on the responsibilities of field users.
4-58 Develop a list of priorities for donated infrastructure/projects.
Develop standards for donated infrastructure/projects to ensure they meet safety standards and the
4-59
requirements of the District.
4-60 Create an asset management plan for major park amenities and infrastructure.
xiv
Executive Summary
RECOMMENDATIONS
Trails
Develop a Trails Master Plan to identify existing trails and missing links within Summerland and in
surrounding areas, to plan a trail network that:
5-1 • Connects neighbourhoods, parks and open spaces, and community amenities;
• Provides active transportation and recreation opportunities; and
• Avoids environmentally sensitive or hazard areas and does not facilitate access to these areas.
Involve trails user groups, environmental groups, and other stakeholders with an interest in trails in
5-2
development of the Trails Master Plan.
The Trails Master Plan should identify mechanisms and processes for collaboration between the District
5-3
and organizations and groups with an interest in trails.
The Trails Master Plan should establish design standards for various intended user groups, as well as
5-4
maintenance standards.
Following development of the Trails Master Plan, implement signage to provide clarity on permitting
5-5 uses on trails as well as wayfinding and promotion of trails (and parks). Signage should have a consistent
look and feel, with Summerland branding.
5-6 Develop a Cycling Network Plan.
Collaborate with the South Okanagan Similkameen Conservation Program (SOSCP), local naturalists and
5-7 environmental groups such as the Summerland Environmental Science Group, and trail user groups and
clubs to understand and inventory ecological values in Summerland’s parks and natural areas.
Summerland Aquatic and Fitness Centre
Conduct a detailed facility audit of the entire Aquatic and Fitness Centre building, its structure and plant
6-1
including compliance with municipal and provincial code requirements.
6-2 Develop an asset lifecycle plan and adjust budgets accordingly.
Develop a long term strategy for the eventual replacement of the Aquatic and Fitness Centre with
6-3
multipurpose rooms, including plans, designs, confirm location, public support and cost estimates.
6-4 Replace or upgrade the pool per the long-term strategy.
6-5 Implement a facility replacement reserve to support the eventual replacement of the facility.
If the estimated life expectancy of the pool is greater than 10 years, add a UV system to reduce
6-6
chlorination and maintenance costs.
Review the pool operating hours and explore opportunities to increase use of the pool and increase
6-7
revenue.
xv
RECOMMENDATIONS
Summerland Arena and Curling Club
Conduct a detailed facility audit of the entire building, its structure and plant including compliance with
6-8
municipal and provincial code requirements.
6-9 Develop a facility maintenance management plan. Adjust budgets accordingly.
6-10 Implement upgrades to the washrooms and changerooms.
6-11 Explore with the Junior ”B” club regarding improving their washroom/changeroom facility.
6-12 Continue to upgrade the concession and concession services.
Develop a long term strategy for the eventual replacement of the Arena Complex. Monitor community
6-13
use levels of the curling rink over the long term.
6-14 Replace or upgrade the arena per the long-term strategy.
6-15 Implement a facility replacement reserve to support the eventual replacement of the facility.
6-16 Conduct a needs assessment and cost analysis for a potential second arena.
Explore options for increasing recreational opportunities such as roller derby in both the arena and
6-17
curling club during the spring dry floor months.
Indoor Facility Supply
Continue to work closely with and support the non-profit societies operating the indoor facilities to
6-18
expand programming and help ensure facilities meet community needs
Continue to liaise cooperatively with the School District during any future facility expansion, especially
6-19 regarding the opportunity to include expanded community use of the secondary school gym if
redeveloped.
Continue to explore opportunities to utilize existing facilities for recreation programs such as the Odd
6-20 fellows/Rebekah Hall, Summerland Drop-In Recreation Centre Association and the UNISUS International
School.
6-21 Explore the possibility of converting the arena concourse into a multi-purpose recreation room.
During any future plans to redevelop the aquatic centre, consider adding a gymnasium in order to
6-22
develop a comprehensive community recreation centre.
xvi
Executive Summary
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recreation Programming - System Wide
Continue to undertake ongoing evaluations of the District’s program requirements, assess priorities and
7-1
abilities to provide services and determine who in the community is best suited to provide that service.
Adopt a facilitator role in working with clubs/associations and other partners to help meet the
7-2
recreational needs of the residents.
Explore opportunities for programming with new partners such as Okanagan College, the agriculture
7-3
research station, Summerland Ornamental garden, Summerland Trout Hatchery.
Host an annual recreation-focussed Community Fair in conjunction with all sports clubs, to help raise
7-4
awareness of the programs available.
7-5 Encourage clubs and associations to offer introductory “How To” lessons to encourage new membership.
Experiment with “Try it for free” or “Bring a Friend” initiatives to increase participation levels for various
7-6
demographics.
Launch a Marketing and Promotion campaign to raise awareness of the health and wellness benefits of
7-7
leisure activities and awareness of the local clubs, facilities and organizations.
7-8 Annually survey a selection of residents to track interest in new programs.
Work with the community to establish outdoor adventure programs: hiking, paddleboard, kayaking, rock
7-9
climbing, equestrian, and nature appreciation.
Review and update the Joint Use Agreement with the School District to improve opportunities for
7-10
programming the gymnasiums.
Collaborate with the Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen, Penticton Indian Band, Interior Health
7-11 and neighbouring communities to identify service gaps, overlaps and opportunities to expand recreation
services on a joint regional scale.
Recreation Programming - Children and Families
Increase family programming and provide more flexibility in programs, especially unstructured/ drop-in
7-12
programs.
7-13 Identify opportunities for concurrent programs for parents and children of different ages.
7-14 Explore the potential for a child-minding facility near the aquatic centre.
7-15 Explore with residents where more free/low cost programs are most needed.
7-16 Review the ice allocation policy to expand family skating.
xvii
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recreation Programming - Youth
Undertake a youth visioning process including a broad range of youth and youth serving agencies
7-17 (police, school, coaches, boys and girls clubs, health authority) to develop a Youth Engagement Strategy
and clearly define the role of the District in the delivery of youth services.
Revise the Terms of Reference for the Parks and Recreation Commission to include one youth
7-18
representative.
7-19 Encourage all clubs and associations to host more introductory programs for youth such as pickleball.
7-20 Assess the potential of social marketing to communicate with youth.
Recreation Programming - Adults
Experiment with more flexible program times and drop-in programs to overcome lack of time as a
7-21
barrier to participation.
Recreation Programming - Seniors
Work with the Summerland Drop In Recreation Centre and related agencies to determine gaps in
7-22 program services and the best means to deliver programs, particularly for fitness, wellness, health,
independence.
7-23 Based on the above, expand programming for seniors.
Environmental Programming
Work in conjunction with local natural history clubs to offer environmental awareness programs and
7-24
host events that raise environmental awareness.
7-25 Promote environmental awareness through District programs and events.
7-26 Add interpretive signage in parks and trails.
Tourism and Special Events
Given staff’s limited capacity, the Recreation Department should continue to focus on core community
7-27
programs, services and special family events within their mandate.
Continue to work with the Chamber of Commerce to identify opportunities for tourism/ special events
7-28
as part of economic development initiatives.
7-29 Work with Destination BC to help market parks and recreation programs to the seasonal tourist.
Initiate an Events Policy to guide the coordination, planning, and administration of events including,
7-30
fees, venues, approval process, contacts, volunteers and definition of acceptable events.
As part of the Events Policy, explore potential for corporate donations, sponsorships and naming rights
7-31
of facilities, programs and events that support tourism.
xviii
Executive Summary
RECOMMENDATIONS
Financial Review
8-1 Conduct a regional review of recreation fees and charges.

8-2 Explore with residents where more free/low cost programs are most needed.
Explore more opportunities to increase recreation revenues in all other areas to offset the cost of
8-3
recreation services.
8-4 Develop policy around commercial use in parks as potential source of revenue
Conduct an organizational review of the Recreation department to analyze current staff levels and
8-5
determine appropriate resources to meet required program and service delivery demands.
Develop a Departmental Operational Plan for the Recreation department to outline the roles and
8-6 responsibilities, define the Mission statement, purpose, core programs and services, expected
outcomes, and community benefits
Parks and Recreation Commission
Change the name and terms of reference from Parks and Recreation Commission to Parks and
8-7
Recreation Advisory Committee.
Revise Section 5 of the bylaw by expanding membership to include a youth representative from
8-8 Summerland Secondary School and a senior’s representative from the Summerland Drop In Recreation
Centre.
Fully engage the Commission in a more proactive and regular manner to assist with implementation of
8-9 the Master Plan, to monitor ongoing performance, to assist in annually setting priorities and reporting
progress to Council.
Revise section 7(a) to read: “The Commission shall hold quarterly meetings with additional meetings as
8-10
required.
8-11 Amend the Parks Regulation Bylaw authority to be the Chief Administrative Officer or designate.
8-12 Amend the Parks Regulation Bylaw to exclude the Peach Orchard Campground and the Rodeo Grounds.
Amend section (3l) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw by deleting reference to bicyclists therefore permitting
8-13
cycling in all parks unless specifically identified as not permitted.
8-14 Amend section (3d) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw to permit horseback riding in Conkle Mountain Park.
8-15 Amend section (3d) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw for any change in the location of off-leash parks.
Amend section (3p) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw to permit skateboarding in designated areas only, or
8-16
those areas where permission to skateboard has been granted.
8-17 Develop a joint use agreement with School District 67 for shared use of District and school facilities.
xix
1
Introduction
Home to approximately 11,600 residents, the District of Summerland is located on the west shore
of Okanagan Lake, nestled between Giant’s Head, Conkle and Cartwright Mountains. Summerland’s
spectacular scenery and mild climate make it a popular tourist destination and provide outstanding
opportunities for outdoor recreation including swimming, hiking, biking, and horse-back riding.
Summerland is located 20 minutes’ drive from Penticton and serves as a bedroom community for many
people who work in Penticton. However, Summerland’s distinct downtown centre and long history
make it a town in its own right, not just a suburb to a larger city. The community is close-knit and
supportive, with flourishing arts, culture, tourism and agriculture. There are many active community
organizations, sports clubs and service clubs that provide a wide range of services, amenities and
activities for residents. Festivals, tournaments and events are held throughout the year and are widely
attended by residents and visitors.
Summerland has numerous parks and trails, including in the surrounding mountains, as well as an
aging but well-maintained arena and aquatic centre. While the population is older than average for
British Columbia, many residents actively use Summerland’s parks, trails and recreation facilities, and
healthy living and wellness are important parts of the community’s character.
Summerland’s Official Community Plan (OCP) sets some effective goals for parks, recreation, trails
and culture. Summerland has the foundation of a robust parks and recreation system. Updating
and improving individual parks, expanding certain amenities, improving connectivity, and upgrading
recreation facilities are key opportunities for the new Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Building on
these and other items in the OCP, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies priorities from a
long term sustainability perspective.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan will provide strategic direction to
the District of Summerland regarding park use, facilities and services over
the next five to ten years. Developed collaboratively through ongoing
consultation with District staff, Council, a Steering Committee, stakeholders
and the public, the Master Plan sets clear directives to guide policy
development and decision making.
This Master Plan takes Summerland’s unique character into consideration,

utilizing planning lenses that ensure the recommendations promote healthy
and sustainable living for residents and visitors. This 10-year planning
document includes:
• An inventory of Summerland’s parks, trails and recreation facilities.
• An overview of trends and comparison to other BC communities.
• Identification of key issues, needs, opportunities, and constraints.
• Recommendations for improvements and additions to parks, trails

and facilities.
• Recommendations for improvements to programming and service

delivery.
• An implementation and phasing plan.
1.1 OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE OF MASTER PLAN
This Master Plan is intended to assist Summerland District Council and

staff in making informed decisions on the future direction of recreation
facilities, parks and open space for the community. It looks at the long-
term future of parks and recreation in the context of the needs and desires
of Summerland’s citizens, user groups, and visitors; comparisons to other
municipalities, internal operations and financial realities. The Master Plan
will serve as a guiding document providing the principles and direction for
parks and recreation standards and service delivery over the next ten years.
The higher purpose of the Master Plan is to help Summerland become

among the best smaller municipalities in the world by creating a truly vibrant
and healthy community.
2
1.2 PROCESS
Development of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan took place between
May, 2017 and April, 2018. It was led by a Steering Committee, composed
of members of the Parks and Recreation Commission and District Recreation
Department staff.
Figure 1 shows the process used to develop the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan. Each phase is described briefly below.
Research and Analysis
This phase involved research and analysis of pertinent information such as

Summerland’s Official Community Plan, 2015-2019 Strategic Plan, Cultural
Plan, and relevant bylaws. It also involved analysis of national trends in
demographics, parks and recreation and their relevance to Summerland;
direct comparison of Summerland to similar BC communities; analysis of
the spatial distribution of existing parks, trails, recreation and open spaces;
and analysis of best practices relevant to Summerland’s provision of parks,
trails, recreation and open space facilities, programs and services. A parks,
trails, and recreation facilities inventory was prepared based on geographic
and inventory information provided by the District as well as site tours of
Summerland’s parks and recreation facilities.
Figure 1: Process used to develop the Parks and Recreation Master Plan
3
Consultation and Engagement
This phase involved engagement with community members,

stakeholders, Council, and staff to gather key information on the needs
of the community and existing services and resources. A detailed
description of engagement is provided in Section 2 below.
Draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan
The results of the research and analysis and consultation engagement

phases were used to develop a draft Master Plan.
Review of the Draft Master Plan
To ensure that the Master Plan effectively met the needs of the
community, the draft Master Plan was reviewed by staff, the project
Steering Committee and the Recreation Commission. Key findings and
recommendations were presented to the community at a public open
house and on the District’s website. Feedback from community members
was gathered at the open house and in an online questionnaire.
Final Parks and Recreation Master Plan
The draft Master Plan was revised to address feedback received during
the review phase. The Final Master Plan was presented to Council, the
Steering Committee and staff and provided to the community online.
1.3 SUMMERLAND COMMUNITY PROFILE
Summerland is a close-knit community, with many residents involved in

indoor and outdoor recreation, community groups and arts and culture.
Compared to British Columbia as a whole, Summerland’s population
tends to be older: almost half of Summerland’s population is 55 years
or older, compared to about a third for BC as whole (Figure 2). From
2011 to 2016 there was a decline in the number of young people and
an increase in the number of older people in Summerland (Figure 3).
This trend is likely to continue, given the attractiveness of the Okanagan
to older adults and retirees and the general demographic trend of an
aging population.
4
Figure 2: Population in 2016: Summerland and British Columbia overall
Figure 3: Summerland population by age group, 2011 and 2016
5
| Introduction District of Summerland Parks + Recreation Master Plan | 06.2018
TABLE 1: SUMMERLAND POPULATION: 2016 AND 2028
Estimated growth Population Estimate

Net Growth
rate
20163 2028
Low (0.5%) 11,615 12,331 716

Moderate (1.0%) 11,615 13,088 1,473
High (2.0%) 11,615 14,731 3,116
Table 1 shows Summerland’s current population and estimated future

population in 10 years, using low, moderate and high growth rates from
Summerland’s OCP.
Summerland’s population grew by 3% from 2011 to 20161 , compared to

2.8% for Okanagan-Similkameen (Regional District) and 5.6% for BC and
5% for Canada. This is between the low (0.5%) and moderate (1%) 1.0 %)
projected annual growth rates in Summerland’s Official Community Plan
(OCP).2
1.4 SUMMERLAND’S COMMUNITY VALUES
Summerland’s community values are reflected in its community Vision and

Community Plan goals. This Master Plan reflects and honours those values,
and aims to contribute to Summerland’s aspiration to become among the
best smaller municipalities in the world by creating a truly vibrant and
healthy community.
Summerland’s Community Vision:4
Our historic lakeside community has a collective sense of belonging and

preserves and enhances its quality of life, agricultural character and its
distinctive natural setting in a manner that reflects our strong social values.
We respect our traditional small town character and proactively work

to ensure balance among our shared values of protecting our natural
environment, supporting a sustained local economy, showcasing cultural
and historical legacies, and providing quality facilities and services for our
diverse population both now and for future generations.
1
Statistics Canada, 2017. Census Profile for Summerland (District municipality). 2016 Census.
2
Table 2, page 5-10.
³Statistics Canada, 2017. Census Profile for Summerland (District municipality). 2016 Census.
⁴Summerland Official Community Plan, p. 4-1.
6
1.5 SUMMERLAND’S STRATEGIC PLAN
The District of Summerland’s 2015-2019 Strategic Plan uses a Balanced

Scorecard approach to achieve citizen objectives for environmental integrity,
social well-being, cultural vitality, and economic vibrancy while considering
corporate financial, internal process, and learning and growth objectives.
Figure 4 shows the Balanced Scorecard.
Virtually all of the Strategic Plan objectives are relevant for parks and
recreation, which plays an important part in achieving community objectives
for environmental integrity, social well-being, cultural vitality, and economic
vibrancy. Corporate financial, internal process and learning and growth
objectives affect howSummerland's
parks and recreation services should be delivered.
Balanced Scorecard
The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that clarifies vision and strategy and translates them into action. It offers feedback around
internal business processes and external outcomes to continuously improve performance and results. The Balanced Scorecard shown below summarizes the citizen's
vision of a quality of life based on environmental integrity, social wellbeing, cultural vitality and economic vibrancy, balanced with the Corporation's need to consider
financial, internal process, and learning and growth perspectives to attain the vision.
Community Themes
Environmental Integrity Social Well-Being Cultural Vitality Economic Vibrancy
Sustainable Health & Safe Creative Active Vibrant, Service

Environment Wellness Community Community Citizenship Connected Excellence
Economy
C6 - Strengthen the
C1 - Protect C2 - Protect and C3 - Plan C5 - Enhance C7 - Facilitate C8 - Foster Corporate
C4 - Link physical, cultural and
Citizen water supply enhance air, growth and public safety economic excellence
neighbourhoods democratic
Objectives water and land preserve ALR participation of development
quality
citizens
Financial F2 - Maintain comparable taxes F3 - Build new partnerships for F4 - Diversify revenue sources
F1 - Sustain community infrastructure
Objectives and fees funding and services
Internal P1 - Implement sustainability P3 - Provide best value for money

P2 - Engage the community P4 - Monitor and report progress
Process principles
Objectives
Learning and L1 - Develop and retain a skilled municipal workforce L2 - Leverage technology, innovation and best practices
Growth Objectives
Figure 4: Summerland Strategic Plan’s Balanced Scorecard
7
Introduction District of Summerland Parks + Recreation Master Plan | 06.2018
Summerland’s OCP and Strategic Plan both express strong goals and
principles to guide parks and recreation planning including:
• Responsive to community needs;
• Equitable and inclusive;
• Respectful of the history, culture and environment;
• Engages the entire community, and
• Affordable, accountable and manageable.
1.6 TRENDS AND A RECREATION FRAMEWORK
In May, 2015, the British Columbia Recreation and Parks Association

approved A Framework for Recreation in Canada 2015: Pathways to
Wellbeing, a joint initiative of the Interprovincial Sport and Recreation
Council and the Canadian Parks and Recreation Association.
The Framework notes that recreation and society have changed substantially
over the past 50 years. While recreation was historically viewed as a public
good, focusing on outreach to vulnerable people within a community, there
has been a shift towards an individual, facility focused, user pay model.
This shift, combined with a need to reaffirm historical values while meeting
needs arising from rapid technological changes, economic, environmental,
demographic and social changes, has resulted in a new shared definition
of recreation:
Recreation is the experience that results from freely chosen participation

in physical, social, intellectual, creative and spiritual pursuits that
enhance individual and community wellbeing.
This encourages an approach which allows recreation to reaffirm historic

values, while simultaneously adopting new ways of working that meet
emerging needs. Emphasizing this revitalization is a community development
approach that empowers people and communities to work together to
enhance well-being. Building on past research and agency collaboration,
the Framework highlights a number of interrelated challenges and current
trends for consideration across Canadian communities, which are outlined
in Table 2. Many of these challenges and trends are present in Summerland,
and are addressed in this Master Plan.
8
TABLE 2: RECREATION TRENDS
Demographic Changes
Canadian communities are faced with an increase in older adults and decline in children. This, coupled
with an increase in cultural diversity, decreased access to nature and decreased place making due to
rapid urbanization all impact the face of recreation. Rural communities are facing increasing pressure
due to limited funds and infrastructure, threats to the environment and traditional ways of life, limited
numbers of volunteers to lead, and challenges in transportation and distance.
Challenges to Health
Increased sedentary living and risk factors for disease (obesity, chronic diseases) and increased mental
health concerns are impacting communities.
Economic Inequities
Family after tax income inequality rose by 41% between 1995 and 2011, with economic gains going
primarily to higher income families. Those with lower incomes have fewer opportunities for recreation.
Social Challenges
Changes associated with increasing inequities, unemployment, use of social media instead of face-to-
face interaction and loss of traditional supports have compounded feelings of isolation for many, has
impacted civic involvement, social connectedness, engagement and social cohesion.
New and Emerging Technologies
The parks and recreation field is challenged to keep up with changing technologies, which offer
opportunities for innovation, communication, improved efficiency, and enhanced connections,
especially in young people. This same technology is resulting in greater time spent in sedentary
pursuits, instead of active and unstructured play.
Infrastructure Deficit
Most communities in Canada face infrastructure deficits. These include the need for additional
walking and cycling routes, and green spaces, as well as the need to upgrade existing facilities to make
them more functional and energy efficient. Maintenance is an ongoing concern. Strengthening this
infrastructure is key to enhancing community health, vitality and the economies of local communities.
Threats to the Natural Environment
Growing threats, including extreme weather, decreasing biodiversity and new destructive species such
as mountain pine beetle have made the role of environmental stewardship increasingly important to
the recreation field.
9
The National Framework sets five priority goals, which also reflect
Summerland’s values, principles and expectations for parks and recreation
services. The goals are shown in Figure 5. The ‘made for Summerland’
recommendations in this Master Plan respond to these high level goals and
priorities.
The framework highlights that parks, recreation and open space provide
significant key benefits to the community as a whole including:
• Enhanced mental and physical well-being;
• Enhanced social well-being;
• Stronger families and communities;
• Better connections to nature, and
• A stronger economy.
Summerland Council plays a pivotal role in the actualization of these benefits

through its policies and programs. This Parks and Recreation Master Plan is
a key vehicle to guide decision-making to maximize the direct and indirect
benefits of parks and recreation services and ensure the fulfillment of
community goals and aspirations.
10
Individual Wellbeing Wellbeing of Natural & Built Environments Community Wellbeing
Values
Public Good Inclusion & Equity Sustainability Lifelong Participation
Principles of Operation
Outcome-Driven Quality & Relevance Evidence-Based Partnerships Innovation
Goals
Active Inclusion Connecting Supportive Recreation
Living & Access People & Nature Environments Capacity
Priorities
- Participation Equitable participation - Natural spaces and - Provide essential - Collaborative
throughout for all, regardless of places spaces and places system
the lifecourse socioeconomic status, - Comprehensive - Use existing - Career
- Physical literacy age, culture, race, system of parks structures and spaces development
- Play Aboriginal status, - Public awareness for multiple purposes - Advanced
- Reduce gender, ability, sexual and education - Renew infrastructure education
sedentary orientation or - Minimize negative - Active transportation - Capacity
behaviours geographic location impacts - Partnerships in social development
environment - Community
- Recreation education leadership
- Assessment tools - Volunteers
- Align community - Knowledge
initiatives development
Figure 5: A Framework for Recreation in Canada 2015: Pathways to Wellbeing

Part II: A Framework for Recreation in Canada 2015 17
11
12
2
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
Community engagement was identified by the District of Summerland as an important part of Master
Plan development. An extensive community and stakeholder engagement process was used to gather
input to, and feedback on, the Master Plan from Summerland residents and visitors; members of
community organizations and sports groups and clubs; Summerland Middle School and Summerland
Secondary School students; service clubs; the Chamber of Commerce; Summerland District Council;
the Parks and Recreation Commission; and District of Summerland staff.
This chapter provides an overview of the engagement activities undertaken as well as a summary of
the main results. More details are provided in Appendices A-E.
2.1 OVERVIEW OF ENGAGEMENT UNDERTAKEN FOR PROJECT

A multi-faceted approach was used for engagement, to reach as many community members and
stakeholders as possible. Engagement activities included two public open houses, workshops with
Summerland District Council and the Master Plan Steering Committee, interviews with stakeholder
groups and District staff, youth engagement, a booth at the Summerland Farmer’s Market, a statistically-
reliable telephone survey, online questionnaires, and stakeholder group questionnaires. Details on
engagement activities are provided in Appendix A.
13
st Practices & Trends District of Summerland Parks + Recreation Master Plan | 06.2018
2.2 INITIAL ENGAGEMENT RESULTS

This section provides an overview of the key themes that emerged in
the initial engagement process, conducted in phase 3 of the project.
More detailed engagement results are provided in the appendices,
including the results of the telephone survey, a summary of youth
engagement, open house feedback and notes from stakeholder
interviews. More generally, input and feedback from community
members, stakeholders, the Master Plan Steering Committee, and
District Council and staff inform the findings and recommendations
throughout the Master Plan.
2.2.1 THEMES
Strong community spirit

Summerland is a close-knit, vibrant community with many active civic,
cultural and sports groups. Festivals and events are held throughout
the year and are important to the community, including Action Fest,
Light Up, Wednesdays in the Park, and the Farmer’s Market.
Summerland has excellent parks and trails

Community members, stakeholder groups and user groups all
commented on the excellence and variety of Summerland’s parks and
trails. Many had specific requests and suggestions for improvements,
but generally agreed that there is a wealth of outdoor recreation
opportunities in Summerland.
Requests for maintenance/upgrades and amenities at

various parks
Community members and user groups identified several needed
improvements and amenities in Summerland’s parks and trails,
including better maintenance, expanding the number of recreation
areas/parks, expanding activities for children/youth, upgrading
washrooms and improving access. These are discussed in detail in
Section 4 below.
Need for better signage and promotion

Community members and stakeholders agreed that while Summerland
has a wealth of excellent parks and trails, there is a need for signage for
wayfinding, promotion and clarity on accepted uses.
Strong support for upgrade/replacement of Aquatic Centre

Summerland’s aging Aquatic and Fitness Centre is a popular community
amenity, but people agreed that it is outdated and lacks important
14
Best Practices & Trends
amenities. There appears to be a high level of community support for expanding

and updating the existing facility or building a new pool, ideally as part of a new
community centre.
General support for upgrade of Arena

Like the Aquatic Centre, the Arena is a popular community amenity. The needs
of residents and user groups are generally being met, but additional ice time
and an additional ice surface was requested by many. People generally felt
that the arena should be upgraded and had specific suggestions for upgrades.
Need for improved recreation programming

Residents are travelling outside the community to access newer facilities
offering a greater selection of recreation programs. There is a desire for more
local, accessible, and expanded programming especially for young families.
Key themes from youth workshops
• Young people appreciate Summerland’s small town character, feeling

of safety and high walkability.
• Older teenagers feel that there is not enough for them to do in

Summerland, and often go to Penticton to use the amenities there.
• Young people are interested in participating in recreation programs,

and helping to plan them.
• Young people would like to see a variety of new amenities in

Summerland including places to support informal socializing, outdoor
sports amenities, play amenities such as slides and a Wibit water park
at the beach, biking and walking trails, outdoor rinks, off-leash dog
parks, community gardens, and indoor recreation facilities.
• Youth would like more festivals, concerts and movies in parks.
15
2.3 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK ON THE DRAFT

MASTER PLAN
In May, 2018, the draft master plan vision, principles and recommendations
were provided to the Summerland community for their review and
feedback. A public open house was held and community members could
also view the draft recommendations on the District of Summerland
website and provide feedback via an online survey.
Approximately 100 people attended the open house and 125 people
completed the online survey, signaling a high degree of community interest
in the master plan.
Overall, community feedback was positive, with 92% of survey respondents

agreeing that the draft Vision and Principles capture the overall community
priorities for parks and recreation. Support from survey respondents for
the recommendations ranged between a low of 71% for playgrounds to
a high of 93% for Summerland's non-lakeshore parks. Fewer than 10% of
survey respondents said they disagreed with any of the recommendations.
(See Table 3).
Summerland residents place a high value on their parks, pool, arena, and
multi-use trails, and some clear priorities have emerged. The highest
priority identified by participants at the open house is building a new
community recreation centre with pool. This was also identified as a high
priority by survey respondents. Other relatively high priorities include
upgrading the arena, upgrading the Aquatic Centre, developing a Trails
Master Plan, creating/protecting more natural areas, keeping recreation
affordable, creating more multi-purpose trails, installing signage on trails,
and maintaining and upgrading existing parks, and creating a multi-use trail
network (see Figures 6 and 7).
Appendix E provides details on community feedback on the draft Master

Plan vision, principles and recommendations.
16
TABLE 3: SURVEY FEEDBACK ON DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS

Neither Agree
Agree Disagree
nor Disagree
Park System 82% 11% 6%

Lakeshore Parks 88% 6% 3%
Other Parks 93% 5% 2%
Playgrounds 71% 18% 9%
Outdoor Sports Amenities 88% 14% 6%
Places for Dogs 77% 13% 9%
Trails 89% 7% 2%
Indoor Recreation Facilities 80% 14% 4%
Summerland Aquatic + Fitness Centre 89% 6% 2%
Summerland Arena + Curling Club 83% 13% 3%
Recreation Programming 86% 11% 1%
Recreation Service Delivery 85% 9% 2%
Figure 6: Dots Allocated Among Priorities by Open House Participants.
17
Build a new multi-purpose community centre with pool

Upgrade the Arena
Build a new Aquatic Centre
Develop a Trails Master Plan
Create/protect more natural areas
Keep recreation opportunities affordable
Create more multi-purpose trails
Install signage on trails (wayfinding, permitted uses)
Create additional or upgrade existing tennis courts
Create new permanent, full-time off-leash dog park
Upgrade/expand existing parks
Create additional pickleball courts
Improve recreation programs
Create more off-road vehicle staging areas
Better maintain parks
Improve water access
Create new neighbourhood parks
Create new playgrounds
Create additional sports fields (soccer, baseball)
20 40 60 80 100 120
Number of dots (open house)/high priority rankings (survey)
Open house Survey high priority
Figure 7: Community Priorities - Actions are shown with the number of dots open house participants
allocated to them (Open house) and how many times survey respondents identified them as a high
priority (Survey high priority).
18
3
SUMMERLAND’S
PARKS AND
RECREATION
SYSTEM
This section provides an overview of Summerland’s parks and recreation system, including vision and
principles, connection to arts and culture, environmental values, and connection to climate change.
3.1 VISION AND PRINCIPLES

The following vision and principles set the stage for the Master Plan by establishing a framework to
provide a clear set of high-level goals that will be the touchstone for evaluation of parks and recreation
plans and priorities in the coming years.
VISION
Summerland’s parks and recreation system contributes to a high quality of life for residents and visitors
by providing accessible, inclusive and engaging indoor and outdoor recreation opportunities that
reflect Summerland’s distinctive natural setting, healthy and active lifestyles, flourishing artistic and
cultural communities, and close-knit, small-town character.
19
PRINCIPLES
• Parks and recreation facilities are accessible, affordable and inclusive

to people of all ages, abilities and income levels.
• Residents are inspired and actively engaged in a healthy lifestyle.
• Residents of all ages have pride in the community and a strong sense
of belonging.
• Parks, recreation and community facilities are linked through a

network of greenways, walkways and trails.
• Parks, trails, and recreation facilities and programs attract new

residents, encourage tourism and stimulate the economy.
• Summerland’s history and culture are celebrated.
• Education, interpretation and health promotion are important.
• Partnerships are encouraged and supported to deliver a wide range

of parks and recreation amenities, services and programs.
• The environment is respected, protected, enhanced and contributes

to the quality of life in the community.
• Staff, volunteers, visitors and partners are valued.
3.2 ARTS AND CULTURE CONNECTION

Summerland’s Cultural Plan (September 2016) articulates five cultural values
that together shape Summerland’s cultural identity:
• The Arts
• Community Character
• Quality of Life
• History and Heritage
• Agriculture
20
Current System
These values echo community values revealed during engagement for

this Master Plan, and inform many of its recommendations.
Summerland’s Cultural Plan identifies five strategic directions to guide

Summerland’s cultural development into the future. There are specific
actions within each of the five strategic directions that relate to parks
and recreation, as outlined below. Recommendations in this Master Plan
echo many of these actions.
1. Reflect Summerland’s cultural values in municipal decisions

and projects
• Incorporate cultural considerations in District of Summerland

policies, including opportunities to include public art and cultural
references in all municipal capital projects.
2. Establish an administrative framework to support the arts,

heritage and culture
• Hire a community co-ordinator.
• Where feasible and appropriate, encourage the participation of

youth on Council committees.
3. Enhance public spaces and cultural places
• Establish an Arts and Culture Centre. Ensure that cultural space

is included in the plans for a future multi-purpose community
centre.
• Consider Summerland’s cultural values in the development of the

Downtown Plan. The Plan should consider a more people-friendly
downtown with a central gathering place like a town square,
more benches, location for event information and tickets, public
washrooms open year-round.
• Consider Summerland’s cultural values in the development of a

plan to the enhance the waterfront.
• Develop a public art policy.
• Include a downtown beautification line item in the municipal

budget for annual maintenance and upgrading of the commercial
core.
21
The Current System District of Summerland Parks + Recreation Master Plan | 06.2018
• Review cultural facilities (including Centre Stage Theatre, Rodeo

Grounds, and municipal parks) for upgrading and multi-use as
part of the Asset Management Plan and Recreation Master Plan
reviews.
4. Build on community strengths and assets
• Build capacity by creating opportunities to support, empower

and recognize community volunteers and volunteer organizations
through initiatives like volunteer fairs, grant writing workshops
and educational seminars, annual community awards, and a
central database of local volunteer opportunities.
• Encourage and facilitate the expansion of existing community

events.
5. Connect the community
• Develop clear, cohesive, creative signage and maps that:
–– improve flow into the downtown
–– improve flow to main attractions
–– identify fruit varieties being grown in orchards and vineyards
–– reflect Summerland’s identity
–– are coordinated with artwork
–– highlight neighbourhoods, landmarks, attractions, food, trails,

etc.
• Support the development of a comprehensive community

calendar of events in both online and paper formats (e.g.,
‘mySummerland’).
• Recognize Summerland’s multicultural diversity in community

events.
• Improve physical connections and flows around the community

including trail systems, bus transport, accessibility, etc.
22
3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES

The District of Summerland is rich in biodiversity, providing many areas
that support Species at Risk. Summerland’s Official Community Plan
(OCP) “recognizes the importance of its natural environment and its
contribution to the health of the community through the preservation of
sensitive ecosystems, their functioning, species therein and connectivity
between natural areas.”
In engagement for this Master Plan, it was clear the Summerland

residents and visitors highly value Summerland’s natural environment.
In addition to Summerland’s extensive natural areas such as Giant’s Head
Mountain and Conkle Mountain, Summerland’s other parks contain
natural features and contribute to the ecological integrity of the region.
In light of this, it is recommended that the District develop a parks
natural features/areas management strategy, to ensure that natural
features in parks are protected and enhanced over time.
Appendix F provides details on the natural features and species at risk

in Summerland.
3.4 CLIMATE CHANGE

3.4.1 GHG EMISSION REDUCTION GOALS AND CLIMATE ACTION
PLAN
Summerland is a signatory to the British Columbia Climate Action

Charter, and the Summerland OCP specifies goals for reducing the
community of Summerland’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 33
percent below 2007 levels by the year 2020; and 80 percent below 2007
levels by the year 2050.
Summerland has a Community Climate Action Plan (2011), which has

seven goals, several of which are relevant to parks, trails and recreation
(see Appendix G).
3.4.2 RECENT INITIATIVES
The District has implemented a number of energy efficiency/renewable

energy projects at the Arena and Aquatic Centre, including installing a
heat exchange loop between the arena and the RCMP building, installing
a solar hot water system at the aquatic centre, and installing LED lighting
23
Best Practices & Trends District of Summerland Parks + Recreation Master Plan | 06.2018
in the arena and aquatic centre.
In 2017, Summerland became first Canadian governmental body to join

the “Billion Dollar Green Challenge”, which encourages governmental
agencies, universities, and other institutions across North America
to invest a combined total of one billion dollars in self-managed
green revolving funds that finance energy and resource efficiency
improvements. This new fund could provide funding for further
investments in energy efficiency and GHG emission reductions in District
recreation facilities and parks.
In December 2017, the District of Summerland joined the Federation

of Canadian Municipalities’ Climate and Asset Management Network, a
two-year initiative that combines peer-learning opportunities, training,
and funding to help Canadian municipalities integrate climate change
and sustainability goals systematically into decision-making about
infrastructure assets, such as roads, buildings, and water and sanitation
systems.
3.4.3 AVOIDED FOREST CONVERSION CREDITS
When BC local governments dedicate forested land as park land,

they may be able to claim credit for the avoided GHG emissions that
result from protecting the forested land, through the Avoided Forest
Conversion (AFC) option.5 The avoided emissions can be claimed
against the local government’s own corporate GHG emissions, helping
the government achieve carbon neutrality, which is a goal under the
British Columbia Climate Action Charter. AFC credits can be claimed for
forested parkland dedicated after the initial signing of the BC Climate
Action Charter in September, 2007 .
There are eligibility criteria and reporting requirements, and eligible

projects must have a Forest Management Plan signed off by a Registered
Professional Forester (RPF). There is therefore a cost to creating these
projects, estimated at $5,000-20,000 for straightforward projects that
estimate emissions using the GCC Carbon Calculator, which calculates a
conservative estimate of avoided emissions. Project proponents could
also hire a RPF to estimate emissions, but that would increase the
project cost.
5
Information about Avoided Forest Conversion credits is in Appendix 6 of Becoming Carbon Neutral: A Guidebook for Local
Governments in British Columbia https://www.toolkit.bc.ca/sites/default/files/BecomingCarbonNeutralGuideV3.pdf
24
3.4.4 RECOMMENDATIONS
3-1 Explore opportunities for using the District’s green revolving fund to
finance further investments in energy efficiency and GHG emission
reductions in District recreation facilities and parks.
3-2 Ensure that remediated or new lakeshore parks and trail areas take
into account projected future flooding under climate change and
reflect best practices for construction in riparian areas as well as
protection and enhancement of riparian ecosystems.
3-3 Ensure that parks and recreation infrastructure is incorporated into

asset management, including recognition of its environmental and
social benefits.
3-4 Continue to improve pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, including

creation of additional multi-use trails that are connected to existing
trail networks.
3-5 Consider placing combined recycling/waste bins in parks, at

trailheads, and outside of the arena and aquatic centre.
3-6 Consider planting more trees along streets and parking lots and in
parks, in the context of an Urban Forest Strategy (see section 4.3.5).
3-7 Explore the potential to claim Avoided Forest Conversion credits for
forested land that was dedicated as new park land after September,
2007.
25
26
4
Parks
This chapter discusses Summerland’s parks system. It begins with a proposed park classification system
and assessment of the sufficiency of park provision, then provides an evaluation of Summerland’s
existing parks and natural areas, with recommendations for changes and improvements. The chapter
concludes with a brief discussion of parks maintenance.
4.1 PARK SYSTEM

4.1.1 PARK CLASSIFICATION
Table 4 shows Summerland parks, organized into a recommended classification scheme. The
classification scheme reflects the different kinds of parks required to meet a range of recreation
needs, and is typical for British Columbia communities. This classification is different from the
classification used in the previous (2001) Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The two classification
schemes are shown in Table 5, for comparison purposes.
There are several differences between the classification used in the 2001 master plan and the one
recommended here:
• The 2001 master plan used only 3 categories for District of Summerland parks: community
parks, neighbourhood parks and public beaches. The classification scheme recommended
here uses 5 categories, and distinguishes between city and community parks, both of which
would have been classified as community parks in the 2001 master plan. As mentioned above,
27
the classification scheme recommended here reflects the different

kinds of parks needed to meet recreation needs and reflect what is
typically seen in BC communities.
• The 2001 master plan classified the parks with beaches as “Public
Beaches”. It is recommended that they be classified as Community
or Neighbourhood Parks (as appropriate according to their size,
function and features), because they provide the same services to
the community as Community and Neighbourhood Parks.
• The 2001 master plan classified Adam’s Street Bird Sanctuary and
Giant’s Head Park as Community Parks. It is recommended instead
that they be classified as Natural Areas since that is their primary
function and character. The 2001 master plan did not include Conkle
Mountain, the Woodbridge Nature Preserve, the Old Hospital-
MacDonald Place site, 16997 Lakeshore Drive “Horse Beach”, or
Cartwright Mountain in its inventory; we recommend that they be
classified as Natural Areas.
• The 2001 master plan classified Peach Orchard Campground as a

Community Park. It is recommended that it be classified as a Special
Purpose park because, although the campground has pickleball and
tennis courts and a playground that are accessible to and used by
Summerland residents, its primary purpose is to provide camping
facilities.
• The 2001 master plan did not include the Rodeo Grounds or Priest
Camp Historic Park in its inventory, but we recommend that they also
be classified as Special Purpose Parks.
28
TABLE 4: SUMMERLAND PARK CLASSIFICATIONS
Category Purpose Typical Size Typical Amenities6 Summerland Parks
• Special event
Provide a place of city-wide sites for fairs,
celebration and activity, festivals • Dale Meadows Park
assessable to all and • Gardens • Living Memorial
Typically greater
City Parks features elements appealing • Natural features Baseball Park
than 12 hectares.
to the broad spectrum of /natural areas • Memorial Park
the community and its • Outdoor sports
visitors. facilities
• Trails
Typically greater
than 2 hectares. • Open space area
• Gordon Beggs Rotary
In some cases, • Large picnic and
Beach
they may be shade shelters
Provide opportunities at • Peach Orchard Beach
smaller than • Washrooms
the community or multi- Park
Community Parks 2 hectares • Large scale play
neighbourhood level for play • Powell Beach Park
but provide areas
and recreation. • Dog beach (in Peach
a destination • Sports amenities
Orchard Park)
amenity, e.g. e.g. tennis courts,
skateboard park. skateboard park
• Beaver St. Park

• Bentley Park
• Butler St. Park
• Crescent Beach
Provide small play and
• Playground or • Julia Street Park
gathering spaces, ideally
Neighbourhood Typically 0.5 – 4 informal open • Kinsmen Park & Holler
within a maximum 10
Parks hectares. space Riparian Area
minute walk from each
• Seating • Turner Street Park
residence.
• Undeveloped parks:
• Deer Ridge Park
• Dunham Park
• Peach Orchard
Parks that provide unique Campground
Special Purpose
functions not typically found N/A • Rodeo Grounds
Parks
in municipal parks. • Priest Camp Historic
Park
• Adams Street Bird
Un-programmed open
• Native vegetation Sanctuary
spaces established to
• Riparian areas • Giant's Head
protect environmentally
• Trails Mountain Park
Natural Areas significant features and N/A
• Wildlife • Mount Conkle Park
provide unprogrammed
• Interpretive • Woodbridge Nature
recreational and interpretive
signage Preserve
opportunities.
6
It should be noted that these are typical amenities. The actual amenities in any park will depend on its purpose, location and
natural features.
29
TABLE 5: RECOMMENDED AND PREVIOUS PARKS CLASSIFICATIONS
Park Recommended classification 2001 classification
Adams Street Bird Sanctuary Natural Area Community Park

Beaver St. Park Neighbourhood Park
Bentley Park Neighbourhood Park
Butler St. Park Neighbourhood Park
Cartwright Mountain Natural Area
Crescent Beach Neighbourhood Park Public Beach
Dale Meadows Park City Park Community Park
Deer Ridge Park Neighbourhood Park Neighbourhood Park
Dog Beach Community Park
Dunham Park Neighbourhood Park
Giant’s Head Mountain Park Natural Area Community Park
Gordon Beggs Rotary Beach Community Park Public Beach
16997 Lakeshore Drive “Horse Beach” Natural Area
Julia Street Park Neighbourhood Park Neighbourhood Park
Kinsmen Park & Holler Riparian Area Neighbourhood Park Public Beach
Living Memorial Baseball Park City Park Community Park
Memorial Park City Park Community Park
Mount Conkle Park Natural Area
Old Hospital-MacDonald Place Natural Area
Peach Orchard Beach Park Community Park Public Beach
Peach Orchard Campground Special Purpose Park Community Park
Powell Beach Park Community Park Public Beach
Priest Camp Historic Park Special Purpose Park
Rodeo Grounds Special Purpose Park
Turner Street Park Neighbourhood Park Neighbourhood Park
Woodbridge Nature Preserve Natural Area
30
4.1.2 PARKLAND SUPPLY
PROVISION OF PARKS
While every community is unique, comparing Summerland’s parks with

those of other communities can provide useful reference points against
which the District can measure its amenities and identify gaps in its levels
of service. Such comparisons can also help track changes over time and
help with decision-making regarding developing future park amenities,
justifying capital expenditures, and leveraging the acquisition of parkland
in new developments.
Summerland’s Official Community Plan notes that “open lands and park
will continue to be established throughout the community based on
anticipated needs.” This includes acquiring land adjacent to Okanagan
Lake as well as “strategically located lands to facilitate the integrated
connection of trails and parks.” 7
The Canadian standard has historically been 4.0 hectares of parkland

per 1,000 residents, but many municipalities, including Summerland, do
not have quantity standards because the amenities and quality of the
parks play an equal, if not more important, role in meeting community
needs. Table 6 shows the total amount of parkland per 1,000 residents in
Summerland compared to the average and median values for 18 British
Columbia municipalities with populations between 5,000 and 15,000
people.
TABLE 6: PARKLAND PER 1000 RESIDENTS
18 BC municipalities with population

5,000-15,000
Summerland
Average Median
Parkland
279.6 139.6 96.0
(hectares)8
Population9 11,615 7,494 9,117
Hectares of
parkland per 1,000 24.1 16.5 9.0
residents10
7
Summerland OCP p. 7-3
8
Total parkland for Summerland is based on the inventory prepared for this Master Plan. Parkland for the 18 BC
municipalities is from CivicInfo surveys: https://civicinfo.bc.ca/surveys.asp
9
Population for Summerland is from the 2016 census, for the Summerland District Municipality. Population for the 18
BC municipalities is from CivicInfo surveys: https://civicinfo.bc.ca/surveys.asp.
10
Note that the average and median values for parkland/1000 residents for the 18 BC municipalities were calculated
by first calculating parkland/1000 residents for each of the 18 municipalities and then taking the average and median
of these values.
31
As can be seen from Table 6, Summerland has considerably more

parkland than the average and median for similar sized BC communities,
and well over the historic Canadian standard. Summerland’s total
parkland includes Giant’s Head Mountain and Conkle Mountain, large
natural areas that together account for more than 70% of Summerland’s
parkland (197 hectares).
Summerland’s parkland area by type is summarized in Table 7.
TABLE 7: SUMMERLAND’S PARKLAND – SUMMARY
Type of park Total area (hectares)
Developed Parkland
City Parks 16.9
Community Parks 5.9
Neighbourhood Parks 0.7
Total Developed Parkland 23.5
Neighbourhood Parks (undeveloped) 0.7
Special Purpose Parks 54.5
Natural Areas 200.8
Total Parkland 279.6
Table 8 provides calculations of developed parkland per 1,000 residents,

for the current population of 11,615 people and for estimated future
populations in 10 years time, using the low, moderate and high
population growth rates specified in the OCP. Summerland currently
has just over 2 hectares of developed parkland per 1,000 residents, and
without the addition of more developed parkland this will decline over
time as the population grows.
It should be noted that this calculation excludes community recreation

amenities provided by Special Purpose Parks such as the Rodeo Grounds
and Peach Orchard Campground, and natural areas such as Giant’s
Head Mountain. Many residents use the Rodeo Grounds for walking
their dogs, horseback riding and family events. The pickleball courts
at Peach Orchard Campground are used extensively by residents, who
also use the tennis court and playground. Giant’s Head Mountain is a
32
TABLE 8: SUMMERLAND’S DEVELOPED PARKLAND PROVISION – CURRENT AND
FUTURE
2028
2016
Low High
Mod. (1.0%)
(0.5%) (2.0%)
Population 11,615 12,331 13,088 14,731

Developed parkland/1000 residents
2.03 1.9 1.8 1.6
(hectares)
Developed parkland/1000 residents,
including Peach Orchard Campground 4.7 4.4 4.2 3.7
amenities + Rodeo Grounds (hectares)
TABLE 9: PARKS PROVISION BY TYPE OF PARK – SELECTED BC MUNICIPALITIES

(HECTARES/1,000 RESIDENTS)
City/
Population Community Neighbourhood Total
Destination
Provincial
- 1.55 0.98 1.4 3.24
average
Summerland 11,615 1.45 0.51 0.06 2.3
Peachland 5,428 2.11 0.15 3.8
Kelowna 127,380 1.2 0.4 0.6 2.2
W. Kelowna 32,655 1.8 1.9 1.1 4.8
Vernon 40,116 2 1 1 4
Fernie 5,249 10.1 3.34 0.73 14.25
Osoyoos 1.4 2.1 0.67 4.1 5,085
Golden 2.2 1.4 3.6 3,708
Merritt 2.2 1.5 0.83 4.53 7,139
Penticton 0.91 0.58 0.12 1.61 33,761
33
popular hiking and cycling spot and is used for several events such as the
Giant’s Head Grind race and Giant’s Head Freeride longboard competition.
If the Rodeo Grounds and the pickleball and tennis courts and playground at
Peach Orchard Campground11 are included in the calculation of developed
parkland12, Summerland currently has 4.7 hectares of developed parkland
per 1,000 residents. This will decline as Summerland’s population grows.
To give a sense of how Summerland’s parkland provision compares to the rest

of British Columbia, Table 9 shows hectares of developed parkland per 1,000
residents, divided into types of developed parks. Summerland’s provision of
city, community and neighbourhood parks is below the provincial average
and falls at the low end of the range for the other municipalities listed in
the table, except for Penticton: Summerland has more parkland per 1,000
residents than Penticton for all three kinds of developed parks.
It should be kept in mind, however, that this comparison does not include
special purpose parks or natural areas which, as discussed above, provide
important recreation amenities.
It is important to recognize that Summerland is a tourist destination, and

that tourists visit Summerland’s parks, particularly the public beaches,
Memorial Park, Giant’s Head Mountain and Conkle Mountain. During the
summer months, residents must share these parks with tourists, making
the real amount of parkland per 1,000 residents lower than in Table 6 for
these parks. It is also important to note that the calculation of Summerland’s
parkland excludes school grounds, which provide community benefit. It also
excludes Sun-Oka Beach Provincial Park, which is adjacent to Summerland
and has a large public beach, picnic areas, playground, off-leash dog beach,
concession and toilets.13 In addition, Summerland is surrounded by extensive
public lands and Okanagan Lake which collectively provide opportunities for
outdoor recreation.
SPATIAL ANALYSIS
One of the most commonly used metrics for assessing park distribution and
possible barriers to park use is walkability in terms of resident proximity
to park space. While there is no consensus on a standard for reasonable
proximity to park space, 5-10 minutes’ walk is commonly used (see textbox
on the next page). For the purposes of this analysis a 5 minute walking
11
Assumed to together comprise 1 hectare.
12
It would not make sense to include Giant’s Head Mountain in a calculation of developed parkland because it is
largely undeveloped, except for the road, parking lot and trails.
13
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/explore/parkpgs/sun_oka/
14
This reflects the commonly-used metrics of 0.25 miles (400 m) being a 5-minute walk (used by Walk Score, for
example) and 0.5 miles (800 m) being a 10-minute walk (used by the US “10-Minute Walk’ campaign, for example).
34
PARK PROXIMITY STANDARDS AND INDICATORS
A recent World Health Organization report on urban green spaces and health proposes an
indicator to assess accessibility to green space, which is being within 300 m of green space of at
least 0.5 hectares in size. The distance of 300 m is chosen because it approximately corresponds
to a 5-minute walk.
The Trust for Public Land, National Recreation and Park Association and the Urban Land Institute
in the United States have launched a campaign to “ensure there’s a great park within a 10-minute
walk of every person, in every neighborhood, in every city across America.” The campaign has
been endorsed by more than 130 mayors from cities across the United States.
The United States EPA’s EnviroAtlas’s indicator for proximity to greenspace is 500m, which is
“easy walking distance”.
Natural England, the government’s adviser for the natural environment in England, has developed
the Accessible Natural Greenspace Standard (ANGst):
ANGSt recommends that everyone, wherever they live, should have an accessible natural
greenspace:
• of at least 2 hectares in size, no more than 300 metres (5 minutes walk) from home;
• at least one accessible 20 hectare site within two kilometres of home;
• one accessible 100 hectare site within five kilometres of home; and
• one accessible 500 hectare site within ten kilometres of home; plus
• a minimum of one hectare of statutory Local Nature Reserves per thousand population.
Sources:
World Health Organization. Urban green spaces and health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office
for Europe, 2016. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/321971/Urban-green-
spaces-and-health-review-evidence.pdf?ua=1
10-minute walk campaign: https://www.10minutewalk.org/#Home
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “ Percent of Residential Population Not
within 500m of a Park Entrance“ EnviroAtlas Fact Sheet. https://enviroatlas.epa.gov/enviroatlas/
DataFactSheets/pdf/ESC/PercentofResidentialPopulationNotWithin500mofaParkEntrance.pdf
Natural England. ‘Nature Nearby’: Accessible Natural Greenspace Guidance. 2010. http://www.
ukmaburbanforum.co.uk/docunents/other/nature_nearby.pdf
35
Figure 8: 400m and 800m Buffers Around Summerland’s Parks
36
distance was set at 400 meters and a 10 minute walking distance was set 800
meters—as a radius from parkland or ‘as the crow flies.’14 The type and quality of the
park does not influence this assessment, nor does the presence of safe pedestrian
or cycling routes. The park service areas are shown in Figure 8.
Much of Summerland lies within a 10-minute walk of a park (800 meters) and is
well-served. The exceptions are the western part of Trout Creek and Happy Valley,
which are underserved in neighborhood park space. In addition, the Sinclair-Barclay
neighbourhood just west of Downtown (between Jubilee Road to the north and
Prairie Valley Road to the south, Cartwright Avenue to the west and Victoria Road
North to the east) is an urban neighbourhood with many families and does not have
a neighbourhood park within walking distance.
4.1.3 FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Summerland’s residents are active and frequent users of parks, trails and open
space. The telephone survey conducted for this Master Plan revealed that the
vast majority (86%) of Summerland residents use parks, trails, and open spaces in
Summerland at least once a month, with two-thirds using them at least once a week
(Figure 9). Walking, biking, swimming, water sports and hiking are all very popular
activities for Summerland residents (Figure 10).
Frequency of Using Parks, Trails and Open Spaces in Summerland

Phone Survey Online Survey
About two-third
parks, trails, and
More than once a week 41% 69%
Summerland at
more (65%), wit
About once a week 24% 17% so at least once
About once every 2-3 weeks 10% 8% Those completin

more frequent u
About once a month 11% 2% parks, trails, and
three-quarters r
About once every 2-3 months 4% 1% them more than
Less often 11% 2%
Not Stated -- 1%
Figure 9: Frequency of Using Summerland’s Parks, Prails and Open Spaces
Base: Total Random (n=200)

Total online (n=268)
37 Q.11) How often do you use parks, trails, and open spaces in Summerland?
Recreation or Cultural Activities Participated in on Regualr Basis

Walking for exercise 57% 75% • Walkin
Theatre/ music/ live performances 32% 34%
56%
outdoo
Bicycle (outdoor) 29%
Swimming/ going to the beach 29% 70% half rep
Water sports-other(kayaking, canoeing, fishing) 29% 35% (57%).
Gardening 24% 51%
Swimming (indoor) 20% 44% • Residen
Golf 19% 18%
Hiking 17% 5% other a
Hockey/ ice skating/ curling 15% 27% particip
Workout centre with cardio and strength/ weights 14% 33% include
Softball/ baseball/ slo-pitch 11% 22% biking,
Arts and crafts 10% 26%
Running/ jogging 10% 29% going to
Fitness classes/ aerobics classes 9% 31% sports s
Tennis 9% 15% fishing.
Skiing 9% 1%
Gymnasium sports (basketball, volleyball, etc.) 6% 17%
• Apart f
Photography 6% 18%
Camping 5% 1% younge
Soccer 3% 16% to do a
Pilates/ yoga 3% 22%
Pickleball 3% 6% • As the
Equestrian 2% 4%
Triathlons 1% 9% residen
Dance <1% 16% respon
Walking dog -- 13% many o
Other 10% 5% activitie
None 6% 1%
and cra
Base: Total Random (n=200) activitie
Total online (n=268) context
Figure 10: Recreation or Cultural Activities Participated In on a Regular Basis survey.
Q.1) What recreational or cultural activities do you participate in on a regular basis? Please think of both
summer and winter months.
Residents and stakeholder organizations generally did not identify a need

for more parkland, with some exceptions, as discussed below. Respondents
to the telephone survey were satisfied with both the number and the
geographic distribution of Summerland’s parks, although some respondents
suggested expanding the number of recreation areas/parks and expanding
activities for children/youth. Respondents were also satisfied with the
maintenance of parks, with the vast majority (85%) giving a good, very
good or excellent rating for Summerland’s parks, trails and open spaces
being sufficiently maintained (see Figure 11). There were however some
respondents who indicated a desire for improvements in the maintenance of
parks, public washrooms, accessibility of parks and an increase in amenities.
38
Some stakeholders and residents have identified the need for particular
kinds of parks and amenities. Off-highway vehicle (OHV) users identified a
need for more staging areas, and highlighted the opportunity created by
changes to the Motor Vehicle Act Regulations for the District of Summerland
to create one or more OHV corridors that would allow OHV users to access
the amenities in Summerland’s downtown. Dog owners have identified a
need for more off-leashed dog park areas. This is discussed in more detail
in section 4.3.3 below. The community has identified a need for a new
skatepark and a committee has been formed to undertake fundraising to
create a new skatepark (see section 4.3.2 below). Finally, as discussed in
section 4.2.2 below, some community members have identified the need
for public gathering space downtown.
Assessment of Summerland’s Parks, Trails and Open Spaces
Sufficient in numbers Phone 18% 37% 32% 9% 23 The majo

Online 11% 26% 33% 17% 9% 4 attribute
and open
Well distributed throughout Phone 16% 33% 35% 11%14
the community Online 10% 35% 31% 14% 5 5 They rece
being suffi
Sufficiently maintained Phone 15% 37% 33% 10% 3 3 provide a
Online 7% 33% 34% 19% 53 excellent
provide a
Variety of amenities Phone 11% 28% 34% 16% 2 9% excellent
provided Online 5 25% 37% 18% 10% 5 provide a
excellent
Physically accessible to those Phone 8% 23% 29% 11% 4 23%
with mobility issues Online 3 16% 17% 18% 7% 40% Online re
critical, p
parks, tra
Excellent Very good Good accessibi
Fair Poor Don't know amenitie
Figure 11: Assessment of Summerland’s Parks, Trails and Open Spaces

Q.13) How would you rate Summerland parks, trails, and open spaces for being:
39
4.1.4 PROVISION STANDARDS
To be comparable to similar BC municipalities and to meet the needs of

Summerland’s residents, it is recommended that Summerland adopt a
park provision standard of 2.2 hectares per 1,000 residents for city and
community parks combined. Summerland’s current stock of city and
community parks combined currently does not meet this standard; an
additional 2.8 hectares of community and/or city park land would need to
be acquired to meet the standard with Summerland’s current population.
As Summerland’s population grows over the next 10 years, between 4.3 and
9.6 hectares of city and community parkland would be needed to maintain
the standard with population growth.
As discussed above, Summerland residents use the amenities at the Rodeo

Grounds and Peach Orchard Campground. Including these in the calculation
of city and community parkland, as shown in the middle section of Table 8,
increases Summerland’s supply of city and community parkland well above
the recommended standard, now and in the future.
It is recommended that Summerland adopt a park provision standard of 0.5

hectares per 1,000 residents for neighbourhood parks. Neighbourhood parks
provide localized services that cannot be replaced by other kinds of parks.
They are within walking distance of residents, making them readily accessible
for children and families. They provide space for informal gathering of
neighbours, helping to strengthen neighbourhood cohesion, and for children
to play without needing their parents to drive them somewhere, helping to
enhance their independence and self-reliance. Neighbourhood parks also
provide greenspace within a built environment, which is beneficial to mental
and physical health, and can provide ecological benefits.
Summerland’s current stock of neighbourhood parks (0.7 hectares total

and 0.06 hectares/1,000 residents) is well below the recommended
standard of 0.5 hectares per 1,000 residents. An additional 5.1 hectares of
neighbourhood parkland would need to be added to meet this standard
with Summerland’s current population, increasing to 5.5 – 6.7 hectares by
2028 with estimated population growth. Adding new neighbourhood parks
in western Trout Creek, Happy Valley and the Sinclair-Barclay neighbourhood
west of Downtown would help bridge this gap, but there would still need to
be additional neighbourhood parkland created.
A nearby city or community park or natural area may take the place of
a neighbourhood park, provided that it is within walking distance in
urban areas or within 10 minutes’ drive in more rural areas and provides
40
opportunities for people to gather informally and for children (and older
people) to play.
Table 10 shows how Summerland’s current parkland provision compares to

these recommended standards, now and in 2028 under low, moderate and
high population growth assumptions. This table assumes that the inventory
of developed parkland remains constant over time.
TABLE 10: SUMMERLAND’S DEVELOPED PARKLAND PROVISION – COMPARISON TO

RECOMMENDED STANDARDS
2028
2016
Low Mod. High
(0.5%) (1.0%) (2.0%)
Population 11,615 12,331 13,088 14,731
City + Community Parks (hectares) 22.8

City + Community Parks (hectares per 1,000 residents) 1.97 1.85 1.75 1.55
Additional City + Community parkland (hectares)
required to meet standard (2.2 hectares/1,000 2.8 4.3 6.0 9.6
residents)
City + Community Parks, including Rodeo Grounds and

Peach Orchard Campground courts and playground 53.7
(hectares)
City + Community Parks, including Rodeo Grounds and
Peach Orchard Campground courts and playground 4.6 4.4 4.1 3.6
(hectares per 1,000 residents)
Neighbourhood Parks (developed) (hectares) 0.7

Neighbourhood Parks (developed)
0.060 0.057 0.053 0.048
(hectares per 1,000 residents)
Additional Neighbourhood parkland (hectares)
required to meet standard (0.5 hectares/1,000 5.1 5.5 5.8 6.7
residents)
41
It is important to remember in a discussion of developed parkland that

this parkland can contain ecologically important natural areas and features
and that recreation is not the only reason to protect parkland. Similarly,
natural areas, while having limited development, are an important part
of Summerland’s parks inventory: they are highly valued by residents
and visitors and provide excellent recreation opportunities and valuable
environmental services such as clean air and water, habitat for plants and
animals, and soil stabilization.
It is also recommended that new developments provide sufficient parkland

so that all residents of the new developments live within 5-10 minutes’
walk of a park. This recommendation is limited to new developments in
recognition of the urban and rural character of Summerland. It would not
make sense to apply the standard in rural areas, where lot sizes are larger
and there is more open space.
4.1.5 DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES
Summerland’s Development Cost Charges (DCC) Bylaw (2000-194) specifies

the charges that will be levied against new developments to offset the capital
costs associated with those development. The bylaw was last updated in
2006.15
Summerland’s DCC Bylaw includes development charges for Park Land

Acquisition and for Park Improvement, which are described in Schedule E to
the bylaw. Development cost charges for park land acquisition are to finance
the “acquisition of two land parcels on the water front along Lakeshore
Drive and 4.27 hectares of land for community and neighbourhood parks
in accordance with the District Of Summerland Recreation Master Plan,
December 2001.” Development cost charges for park improvements are
for recreation buildings or outdoor recreation facilities in existing parks.16
Under Summerland’s DCC bylaw, parks-related development cost charges

are levied only against residential developments. The bylaw specifies a single
“Parks DCC” rate per dwelling unit, which differs according to whether the
proposed development is Single Family Residential, Multi Family Residential
– large dwelling unit, or Multi Family Residential – small dwelling unit. How
funds are to be divided between Parks Acquisition and Parks Improvement
is not specified in the bylaw.
The provincial government has developed a “Development cost charge best

practices guide”, which specifies procedures for determining the different
15
Except for an addition of bylaw 2000-454 in 2011, which specified that “For the purposes of this Bylaw, development
in the RPN-Residential Pocket Neighbourhood Zone is considered Multi-Family development.”
16
Section 566.2(b)(ii) of the Local Government Act specifies that development cost charges are to be used for
“providing fencing, landscaping, drainage and irrigation, trails, restrooms, changing rooms and playground and
playing field equipment on park land”.
42
kinds of development cost charges, including parks.17 The guide notes
that
In practice, a parkland acquisition and improvement program is

required, before parkland DCCs can be calculated. … guidance for
compiling a parkland acquisition and improvement program can
come from the OCP, the Parks Master Plan, and/or other provisions
found in the Local Government Act. The OCP often broadly specifies
park, recreation, and open space objectives. Sometimes, even
certain park sites might be described. Acceptable standards for
active park and passive open space are usually defined in a Parks
Master Plan.
Summerland does not currently have a parkland acquisition program.

The parkland improvement program is articulated through Summerland’s
capital plans. Development of a coherent parkland acquisition and
improvement program would enable Summerland to ensure that DCC
rates are sufficient and to optimally allocate funds raised through Park
DCCs between acquisition and improvements.
4.1.6 PARKLAND DEDICATION
Municipalities in British Columbia may dedicate parkland by bylaw or

through the development process. In the latter case, municipalities can
require developers to provide up to 5% of the subdivided land, or cash-
in-lieu. In addition, municipalities can collect Development Cost Charges
for parkland acquisition and development.
Disposal of parkland that is dedicated through bylaw or the development

process requires the approval of the electors. In addition, the proceeds
of disposal of parkland dedicated through the development process
must be placed in a fund for parkland acquisition.
In November 2016, the District of Summerland dedicated parkland on

Conkle Mountain. Further research is required to determine which other
parks in Summerland have been dedicated and which have not.
The BC government best practices guide for parkland acquisition

provides guidance on parkland dedication.18
17
BC Ministry of Community Services. Development cost charge best practices guide. 3rd Edition. 2005. http://www.
cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/intergov_relations/library/DCC_Best_Practice_Guide_2005.pdf
18
BC Ministry of Community Services. Parkland Acquisition Best Practices Guide. 2005. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/
gov/british-columbians-our-governments/local-governments/finance/parkland_acquisition_best_practices_guide.pdf
43
4.1.7 KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
KEY FINDINGS
• Summerland is well-served in terms of total quantity of parkland and

most of Summerland is within a 10-minute walk of a park.
• Summerland is well-served for city parks, less well-served for

community parks, and poorly served for neighbourhood parks.
• Three neighbourhoods – the western part of Trout Creek, Happy

Valley and the Sinclair-Barclay neighbourhood west of Downtown –
are underserved with neighbourhood parks.
• Summerland’s OCP specifies that parks and open spaces will

continue to be established, including lands adjacent to Lake
Okanagan and lands to facilitate connectivity among parks and trails.
• Residents are active and frequent users of Summerland’s parks and

trails and in general are satisfied with the quantity, distribution and
maintenance of parks, trails and open space.
• Some stakeholders and residents have identified the need for

particular kinds of parks and amenities, including staging areas for
off-highway vehicles, off-leash dog parks, a new skatepark, and
gathering space in the downtown core.
• Summerland’s Development Cost Charges (DCC) Bylaw specifies

a Parks DCC which funds Park Land Acquisition and Park
Improvements. The DCC Bylaw was last updated in 2006.
• Summerland does not currently have a parkland acquisition

program. The parkland improvement program is articulated through
Summerland’s capital plans.
• Development of a parkland acquisition and improvement program

would enable Summerland to ensure that DCC rates are sufficient
and to optimally allocate funds raised through Park DCCs between
acquisition and improvements.
44
RECOMMENDATIONS
4-1 Adopt the recommended parks classification scheme.
4-2 Adopt recommended park supply standards:
–– 0.5 ha/1,000 residents for neighbourhood parks, and
–– 2.2 ha/1,000 residents for community and city parks.
4-3 Ensure that new developments include adequate parks and

open space to meet the needs of new residents:
–– All residents within a 5-10 minute walk of a park, and
–– At least 2.7 hectares of developed parkland for every 1,000

new residents.
4-4 Develop a Parkland Acquisition and Improvement Program that

targets the recommended park supply standards and identifies
priorities and requirements for Parkland Acquisition and
Improvements. Update the DCC Bylaw to reflect the Parkland
Acquisition and Improvement Program.
4-5 Acquire and develop neighbourhood parks, particularly in

western Trout Creek, Happy Valley and the Sinclair-Barclay
neighbourhood west of Downtown.
4-6 Develop a parks natural features/areas management strategy.
4-7 Prepare a comprehensive inventory of District parkland

including parcel sizes, designation in OCP, zoning, whether
dedicated or not, history and intended uses. Ensure that both
existing and new parks are properly dedicated and documented
as they are added to the inventory.
4.2 SUMMERLAND’S PARKS

Summerland's parks and their amenities and sizes are shown in Table 11
and Figure 12 shows the parks on a map. Summerland has a variety of
parks, ranging from city parks such as Dale Meadows and Memorial Park
to small, neighbourhood parks such as Julia Street Park. Summerland’s
45
TABLE 11: SUMMERLAND’S PARKS
Size
Name Description Size (ha)
(acres)
City Parks
Dale Meadows 5 fenced softball fields, 3 soccer fields, 1.2 Km jogging track, a new
24.25 9.8
Park enclosed playground, washrooms, picnic tables, benches and bleachers
Living Memorial
3 ball diamonds, bleachers, benches, and washroom facility 12.5 5.1
Baseball Park
Urban park within the downtown core. Large grassy areas, mature shade
Memorial Park trees, picnic tables, washrooms, playground, benches and bandshell. 5.0 2.0
Focal point for many festivals and events including Action Fest.
Subtotal: City Parks 41.75 16.9
Community Parks
Sandy beach, swimming docks including the historic Kiwanis Pier,

Gordon Beggs
washroom facilities, shade trees, park benches, and picnic tables. Popular 4.0 1.6
Rotary Beach
with residents and tourists
Large grassy areas, sandy beach, volleyball court, playground, walkway,
Peach Orchard picnic tables and benches, washrooms, a boat launch and a floating dock.
3.5 1.4
Beach Park Also has Spirit Square, a large covered gazebo with stage area, and the
Summerland Millennium Spray Park
Enclosed area of beach where dogs are permitted off-leash. Located at
Dog Beach 0.2 0.1
the south end of Peach Orchard Park.
Beach, softball field, tennis courts, playground, washroom facilities,
Powell Beach Park 7 2.8
shade trees, picnic tables and park benches.
Subtotal: Community Parks 14.7 5.9
Neighbourhood Parks - Developed
Beaver St. Park Lakeshore park with picnic table and bench 0.2 0.1
Bentley Park Small park with Welcome to Summerland sign and picnic tables 0.2 0.1
Butler St. Park Lakeshore park with picnic table and bench 0.2 0.1
Crescent Beach Beach with picnic tables and benches (no washroom facility) 0.2 0.1
Julia Street Park Playground, picnic tables, benches (no washroom facilities) 0.2 0.1
Kinsmen Park &
Lakeshore park with playground equipment, picnic table, benches, creek
Holler Riparian 0.4 0.2
riparian education signage and sister city bench and sign
Area
Turner Street Park Small park with picnic table and bench 0.3 0.1
Subtotal: Neighbourhood Parks - Developed 1.7 0.7
46
TABLE 11: SUMMERLAND’S PARKS
Size Size
Name Description
(acres) (ha)
Neighbourhood Parks - Undeveloped
Deer Ridge Park Undeveloped open space 0.5 0.2
Dunham Park Undeveloped open space 0.3 0.1
Old Hospital-
1.0 0.4
MacDonald Place
Subtotal: Neighbourhood Parks - Undeveloped 1.8 0.7
Special Purpose Parks
Peach Orchard 123 campsites for RVs and tenting, washroom with showers, pickleball
11.0 4.5
Campground courts, shared pickleball-tennis court, playground
Outdoor grandstand and riding ring, several stalls or pens for animals,
Rodeo Grounds clubhouse (capacity 100 people), seasonal concession, washroom + 73.76 29.8
shower facility
Priest Camp Historic Picnic site with picnic table, rustic washroom facility and historical
50.0 20.2
Park interpretation signs, located at Garnet Valley Dam
Subtotal: Special Purpose Parks 134.8 54.5
Natural Areas
Adams Street Bird Open space donated by the Adams Family for bird sanctuary, with a
2.0 0.8
Sanctuary walkway and bridge donated by the Rotary Club
Cartwright
3.5 1.4
Mountain
Landmark feature of the community with extensive natural areas. Paved
Giant’s Head road leads to a picnic area and washroom. Multi-use trails to the summit.
220.0 89.0
Mountain Park Summit is 2,771 feet (845 meters) above sea level and provides panoramic
views.
16997 Lakeshore
0.2 0.1
Drive “Horse Beach”
Natural park with multi-use trails including a portion of the Trans Canada
Mount Conkle Park 268.0 108.5
Trail
Woodbridge Nature Natural area with cottonwood trees providing habitat for Lewis’s
1 0.4
Preserve woodpecker and western screech owl.
Subtotal: Natural Areas 494.1 200.8
Total Parkland 688.8 279.6
47
Figure 12: Summerland’s Parks
48
location on the shores of Okanagan Lake provides an opportunity for
several public beaches: the large and centrally-located Rotary Beach
and Peach Orchard Park are popular choices for tourists and residents,
while smaller or less centrally-located beaches such as Crescent Beach
and Powell Beach Park are used more by residents.
Appendix H provides descriptions of Summerland’s parks and the needs

and wants that have been identified for these parks.
KEY FINDINGS
• Summerland has a variety of excellent parks, which includes

several lakeshore parks with beaches, the Dale Meadows Park
and Living Memorial Park sports fields, the centrally-located
Memorial Park, several neighbourhood parks, several natural
areas with passive recreation opportunities, and special purpose
parks like Peach Orchard Campground, Rodeo Grounds and Priest
Camp.
• Remediation in lakeshore parks presents an opportunity

to improve ecological integrity, recreation amenities and
accessibility as well as increase resilience to future flood events.
• Washrooms in several parks need upgrading.
• Winterizing washrooms in Peach Orchard Park and Memorial

Park would permit year-round use.
• Memorial Park and the Rodeo Grounds were both identified by

the community as needing revitalization.
• Dale Meadows Park is well used by sports groups for league play
and tournaments, and fields are generally well-maintained but
some needed improvements have been noted by field users.
Improved turf management would be possible with purchase of
top-dresser; parking lot and washrooms not sufficient when all
fields are in use.
• Summerland has two undeveloped neighbourhood parks, Deer

Ridge Park and Dunham Park.
• A Trails Redevelopment Plan is under way for Giant’s Head

Mountain.
49
• Natural areas Conkle Mountain Park and the Woodbridge Nature

Preserve were dedicated as parkland in 2016. Community members
would like to maintain current recreation uses in Conkle Mountain
Park and Council passed a resolution to allow these uses to continue.
• There are few public gathering spaces in the downtown area. The
Downtown Strategic Plan and the Cultural Plan call for establishing a
gathering space, outdoor seating areas, public art and landscaping.
Memorial Park may be a good location for a gathering place.
RECOMMENDATIONS
4-8 Use flood remediation in lakeshore parks as opportunity to improve

amenities and accessibility as well as resilience to future flood
events.
4-9 Upgrade washrooms in Gordon Beggs Rotary Beach Park and Peach
Orchard Campground.
4-10 Explore the cost & feasibility of upgrading and winterizing the
washrooms at Peach Orchard Beach Park and Memorial Park.
4-11 Undertake park master plan/visioning for Memorial Park.
4-12 Repair roof and enclose stage of bandshell in Memorial Park.
4-13 Add more play equipment such as a slide and sun shelter (pergola)
to the picnic area along the walkway in Gordon Beggs Rotary Beach
Park.
4-14 Investigate the feasibility of making Dog Beach accessible to people

with mobility challenges.
4-15 Explore opportunities to expand boat launch parking lot adjacent to

Peach Orchard Beach Park.
4-16 Explore a long distance designated swim lane from Peach Orchard
Park to Rotary Beach.
4-17 Undertake conceptual planning for Peach Orchard Beach Park.
4-18 Undertake improvements to Powell Beach Park.
50
4-19 Pave Dale Meadows Park parking lot using a permeable surface or
other eco-friendly solution.
4-20 Consider building a change room/clubhouse facility at Dale

Meadows in partnership with sports clubs.
4-21 To improve turf management on sports fields, purchase a reel

mower once the parking lot at Dale Meadows Park has been
resurfaced.
4-22 Resurface perimeter track at Dale Meadows Park.
4-23 Improve communication and coordination with user groups,

including hosting an annual meeting each spring with District staff
and sports field user group representatives.
4-24 Explore whether Deer Ridge Park can or should be transformed

into a neighbourhood park.
4-25 Explore whether Dunham Park can or should be transformed into

a neighbourhood park.
4-26 Undertake master planning for Conkle Mountain Park.
4-27 Prohibit recreation access to Woodbridge Nature Preserve, except

at the property perimeter.
4-28 Explore possibilities for community off-season use of Peach

Orchard Campground.
4-29 Undertake a master plan for the Rodeo Grounds, exploring

community needs and possible uses for the site, servicing
requirements and costs, and possible operating arrangements.
4-30 Implement the recommendations of the Downtown Strategic Plan

to create a central gathering place in the Downtown core and
enhance public open space.
4-31 Explore other opportunities for permanent or temporary public

plazas/gathering spaces in the downtown area, in collaboration
with Chamber of Commerce, School District, and churches.
4-32 Enhance the public gathering space in Memorial Park.
51
4-33 When building new buildings/washrooms/facilities or

undertaking major renovations, consider opportunities to
increase energy efficiency, install solar panels, and rainwater
collection.
4-34 Assess the accessibility of all District of Summerland-owned

outdoor public washrooms.
4.3 PARK AMENITIES

One way to assess whether the number and kind of a community’s park
amenities is sufficient is by comparison with other communities. For this
Master Plan, the number of various park amenities in Summerland was
compared to other similarly sized BC communities. Although useful in
terms of a rough comparison, it should be noted that each community
has different needs for park amenities. This comparison, as well as
feedback from community members, stakeholders, and staff and trends
and best practices, informed the key findings and recommendations in
this Master Plan.
4.3.1 PLAYGROUNDS
As a general metric, all residents should be within a ten minute walk

(about 800m) of a public playground in urban areas, and a ten minute
drive in rural areas. Summerland has ten playgrounds, located at Dale
Meadows Park, Julia Street Park, Kinsmen Park, Memorial Park, Peach
Orchard Beach Park, Peach Orchard Campground, Powell Beach Park,
Giant’s Head Elementary School, Trout Creek Elementary School and
Summerland Middle School. There is also a spray park in Peach Orchard
Park that operates from May to September.
These playgrounds are fairly well distributed within Summerland, so that

most residents are within a ten minute walk of a playground. There are
some gaps, though, as shown in Figure 13, a map showing Summerland’s
playgrounds with 800 m buffers.
Summerland’s playgrounds are well-maintained and are regularly

inspected by staff. Service clubs, particularly the Summerland
Lions, Rotary and Kinsmen Clubs, have built many of Summerland’s
playgrounds. Replacement of playgrounds is driven by industry safety
standards and replacement of the playgrounds in Memorial Park, Peach
Orchard Park and Peach Orchard Campground is planned and budgeted
52
for 2018. There is a plan to install outdoor fitness equipment adjacent to
the playground in Memorial Park. Playgrounds in the other parks should
be replaced as needed to ensure they meet safety requirements and the
needs of Summerland’s children.
Natural playgrounds have become increasingly popular because they

offer unique opportunities for connection with nature, creativity,
and risk-taking that have been shown to be beneficial for children’s
development. Natural playgrounds feature elements found in nature
such as tree trunks and branches, rocks, and mud and are intended
for children to play in a natural setting. One definition, of “a nature play
and learning place”:
A designated, managed area in an existing or modified outdoor

environment where children of all ages and abilities play and learn
by engaging with and manipulating diverse natural elements,
materials, organisms, and habitats, through sensory, fine motor
and gross motor experiences. 19
Natural playgrounds can be a complement to the existing more

traditional playgrounds.
KEY FINDINGS
• Summerland has ten playgrounds, which are fairly well-

distributed.
• Some areas of Summerland are within a ten-minute walk (800 m)

of a playground, but others are not, including the western and
southern parts of Lower Town, the western part of Trout Creek
and Happy Valley.
• Summerland’s playgrounds are well-maintained and inspected

regularly. Replacement of the playgrounds in Memorial Park,
Peach Orchard Beach Park, and Peach Orchard Campground are
planned and budgeted for 2018.
• Natural playgrounds have become increasingly popular and offer

benefits for children’s development.
Moore, R. (2014). Nature Play & Learning Places. Creating and managing places where children engage with nature. Raleigh,
19
NC: Natural Learning Initiative and Reston, VA: National Wildlife Federation Version 1.4.
53
Figure 13: Summerland playgrounds with 800 m buffers
54
RECOMMENDATIONS
4-35 Replace the playgrounds in Memorial Park, Peach Orchard Beach

Park, and Peach Orchard Campground as planned.
4-36 Replace playgrounds in other parks as needed.
4-37 Create new playgrounds, including natural playgrounds, in areas

that are not currently within 10-minutes of walk of a playground
(western and southern parts of Lower Town, the western part of
Trout Creek and Happy Valley).
4.3.2 OUTDOOR SPORTS AMENITIES
Table 12 shows the numbers of sports amenities in Summerland, compared

to the average and median numbers for 19 BC municipalities with populations
between 5,000 and 15,000 people.
TABLE 12: SPORTS AMENITIES20
19 BC Municipalities with
District of populations 5,000-15,000
Number of Sports Amenities
Summerland
Average Median
Baseball and Softball Fields 9.0 6.4 6.0

Basketball Courts Outdoor21 1.0 1.1 1.0
Skateboard Parks 1.0 1.0 1.0
Soccer Fields Outdoor 6.0 4.7 3.5
Tennis Courts Outdoor 2.0 3.9 4.0
Pickleball Courts Outdoor 2.0 n/a n/a
Combined Pickleball-Tennis
1.0 n/a n/a
Courts Outdoor
Water and Spray Parks 1.0 0.8 1.0
20
Summerland’s sport amenities are based on an inventory prepared for this Master Plan. The number of sport
amenities for 19 BC municipalities is from CivicInfo surveys: https://civicinfo.bc.ca/surveys.asp.
21
Located at Summerland Middle School.
55
With the exceptions of tennis and pickleball courts, Summerland

either meets or exceeds the average and median values for similar BC
communities, suggesting that Summerland is relatively well-served for
most outdoor sports amenities. This is confirmed by both stakeholders
and staff, who did not identify a current need for additional sports
amenities, with some exceptions as noted below.
SPORTS FIELDS AND BALL DIAMONDS
Summerland has 6 soccer fields – 3 at Dale Meadows Park and 3 on

school grounds. The soccer fields at Dale Meadows Park are used
throughout the summer by youth and senior men’s soccer leagues.
Summerland’s 9 baseball/softball fields are located at Dale Meadows
Park (5 softball fields), Living Memorial Park (3 baseball fields), and
Powell Beach Park (1 softball field). The fields at Dale Meadows are
used throughout the summer for Slo-pitch, softball and girls fastball
league play and several tournaments, including Action Fest. The fields
at Living Memorial Park are used daily by Summerland Minor Baseball
teams from April through June, and sometimes for peewee and bantam
league play in July and August. They are also used by Action Fest and
for tournaments that need more than the 5 fields at Dale Meadows
Park. Summerland Minor Fastball uses the field at Powell Beach Park
for league play from April to June.
During engagement for this Master Plan, stakeholder organizations did

not indicate that more sports fields and ball diamonds are needed at this
time, except that Summerland Minor Fastball has identified the need
for a new indoor facility for coaching clinics and as discussed in section
4.2.1 above, user groups have identified quality and maintenance
improvements needed on the fields at Dale Meadows Park, as well as
additional supporting facilities.
Recreation department staff confirm that they are able to satisfy

current needs on existing fields, although sometimes compromise
and cooperation is needed to meet the needs of all organizations (for
instance to resolve scheduling conflicts). Stakeholders report that staff
work well with sport organizations to try to ensure that everyone’s needs
are met.
TENNIS COURTS
Summerland has 2 public outdoor tennis courts. located at Powell Beach

Park, and there is a public shared tennis and pickleball court at Peach
56
Orchard Campground. In addition, there are 3 tennis courts at Summerland
Secondary School and 3 tennis courts at the Lakeshore Racquets Club.
Because the courts at Summerland Secondary School are in disrepair, there

are only 5 usable tennis courts (not including the shared pickleball-tennis
court) in Summerland. Moreover, the Powell Beach tennis courts have
multiple cracks and are subject to flooding, which reduces the utility of
these courts for tennis play.
During engagement for this Master Plan, tennis players identified a need
for more tennis courts. The Lakeshore Racquets Club has had to reduce the
scope of their largest tournament, the Greenfield Cup, from four events to
two due to a lack of public tennis courts; they note that
Our three tournaments bring in visitors from Vernon to Osoyoos,

the Lower Mainland, Kamloops and the Kootenays. It has become
increasingly difficult to host tournaments on just 5 courts and if there is
water issues at Powell Beach scheduling becomes even more difficult.22
Compared to other communities in the region, Summerland is relatively

under-served for the number of public tennis courts (see Table 13); the
number of courts in Table 12 reported for Summerland excluses the 3 courts
provided at the Lakeshore Racquest Club and the 3 courts at Summerland
Secondary School.
Using benchmarking from BC Tennis, Summerland’s population of

approximately 10,970 people over the age of 6 suggests demand between
5,000-15,000 hours of tennis per year, from more than 2,600 tennis players
(see Table 14). This is equivalent to using Summerland’s 8 courts (2 public
plus 3 at Summerland Secondary School plus 3 at Lakeshore Racquets) for
8 hours a day every day for between 78 and 234 days a year. Community
demand could be met if all courts were well maintained in good condition.
It is recommended that the District assess and undertake needed repairs

at the Powell Beach tennis courts and work with the School District to
rehabilitate the tennis courts at Summerland Secondary School, ensuring
they are accessible to community members at all times and days, except
when in use by school classes. If rebuilding the courts at Summerland
Secondary School is not possible, the District should explore opportunities
to build 3 new courts in another location, perhaps at Dale Meadows, if land
is available; Living Memorial if field use declines; or as part of the Rodeo
Grounds master planning.
Lakeshore Racquets Club, Review of Summerland’s Tennis Courts On behalf of District of Summerland Recreation
22
Department. April 10, 2018
57
PICKLEBALL
Pickleball is a popular sport in the entire Okanagan valley including

Summerland. The Summerland Pickleball Club (SPC) had 113 members
in 2017 and is active year-round, playing in the summer at the 2 outdoor
pickleball courts at Peach Orchard Campground and in the winter indoors
in the Harold Simpson Youth Centre and the Badminton Club. Compared to
other communities in the region, Summerland is underserved for pickleball
courts (see Table 13).
The SPC notes that in the winter of 2017-18, the majority of SPC members
played at least twice a week for 2 to 3 hours per session with some players
playing 5 times per week; in January and February 2018, there were a total
of 733 player visits. The SPC reports that between June 12 and October
11, 2017, on 98 days of play, there were 1,387 player visits to the outdoor
pickleball courts at Peach Orchard Campground, which includes hours for
dedicated SPC play as well as public play.
In 2017, the District of Summerland converted one of the two tennis courts at
Peach Orchard Campground to two dedicated pickleball courts and painted
pickleball lines on the other tennis court. The SPC had requested that both
tennis courts be converted to 6 dedicated pickleball courts, but the District
wanted to keep one tennis court as it is the only one in the core part of town.
The SPC would still like the remaining shared tennis and pickleball court at
Peach Orchard Campground converted to dedicated pickleball courts. The
Lakeshore Racquets Club (LRC) notes that use of this court for tennis is drop-
in use, primarily by users of the campground and that tennis players have
to work around the pickleball schedule. The LRC does not anticipate use of
this court, due to conflict with pickleball activities.
The District will need to balance the needs of tennis and pickleball players
in provision of court space. Both groups currently feel that the current
provision of courts is inadequate.
To provide additional outdoor pickleball courts, it is recommended that the

District convert the two existing pickleball courts into four courts. Once the
tennis courts at Summerland Secondary School have been rehabilitated, the
shared tennis and pickleball court at Peach Orchard Campground could be
converted to dedicated pickleball courts. It should be noted, however, that
the SPC does not view the Peach Orchard Campground courts as an ideal
location for the long-term. They would like a long-term dedicated site for
outdoor pickleball that would permit expansion over time as the number
of pickleball players grows.
58
TABLE 13: COMPARISON OF PROVISION OF PUBLIC OUTDOOR TENNIS AND
PICKLEBALL COURTS
Tennis Pickleball Shared Tennis &
Community Population
Courts Courts23 Pickleball Courts
Summerland 11,615 2 2 1
Osoyoos 5,085 3 4
Oliver 5,279 3 4
Peachland 5,428 2 2
Merritt 7,139 6 6
West Kelowna 32,665 15 11
Penticton 33,761 9 4 2
Vernon 40,116 16 10 9
Kamloops 90,280 21 8 6
Kelowna 127,380 23 20 7
TABLE 14: ESTIMATED TENNIS DEMAND
Calculated demand for

Summerland
court hours
Tennis BC
Frequency of playing
benchmark24 population tennis
low high
(6+ years) players
1-3 times per year

13.5% 10,970 1,481 740 2,221
(occasional)
4-20 times per year
8.4% 10,970 921 1,843 9,215
(regular)
21+ times per year
2.1% 10,970 230 2,419 4,838
(frequent - avid)
Total 2,633 5,002 16,274
Data provided by Vernon Pickleball Club and Lori Mullin, District of Summerland.
23
As cited in Finding the Sweet Spot: A Step by Step Guide to Community Tennis Facility Development, Tennis Canada,
24
2008, Appendix p.18.
59
In engagement for this master plan, it was suggested that indoor

facilities for tennis and/or pickleball would be beneficial and could be a
regional draw. A new community centre with gymnasium could provide
opportunities for indoor pickleball play.
BASKETBALL COURTS, SKATEPARK AND WATERPARK
Summerland has 1 outdoor basketball court with 2 hoops, located at

Summerland Middle School. There are also outdoor basketball hoops
at Dale Meadows Park and Summerland Secondary School., but they
are sometimes not available for play due to parking. In engagement
for this Master Plan, youth did not identify a need for more outdoor
basketball courts.
A new skatepark is under construction, to be located at the southwest

corner of Jubilee Road and Rosedale Avenue.
A waterpark is located in Peach Orchard Park and is operational from

May through September.
KEY FINDINGS
• Summerland is well-served for outdoor sports amenities.
• Sports fields are well-used.
• Summerland is relatively under-served for public tennis courts.

Additional tennis courts are available at the Lakeshore Racquets
Club and Summerland Secondary School, but the latter are in
disrepair.
• Summerland is relatively under-served for pickleball courts.

Pickleball players would like additional outdoor courts as well as
indoor courts.
• Summerland has 1 outdoor basketball court, at Summerland

Middle School, and outdoor basketball hoops at Dale Meadows
Park and Summerland Secondary School.
• A new skatepark is under construction, at the southwest corner

of Jubilee Road and Rosedale Avenue.
• Summerland has one waterpark, located in Peach Orchard Beach

Park.
60
RECOMMENDATIONS
4-38 Additional sports fields are not needed currently, but District
should monitor over time to determine whether community
needs are continuing to be met with existing fields.
4-39 Assess the Powell Beach tennis courts and undertake any
needed repairs.
4-40 Work with the School District to rehabilitate the tennis courts at
Summerland Secondary School.
4-41 Convert the 2 dedicated pickleball courts at Peach Orchard

Campground to 4 courts.
4-42 Once the tennis courts at the Summerland Secondary School

have been rehabilitated, convert the shared tennis-pickleball
court at Peach Orchard Campground to dedicated pickleball
courts.
4-43 Explore possibilities for a long-term dedicated site for outdoor

pickleball that would permit expansion over time as the number
of pickleball players grows.
4.3.3 PLACES FOR DOGS
BENEFITS
Many people have dogs, and places for people to exercise their dogs
are increasingly recognized as a priority in communities. Several
communities in BC have developed dog strategies, and many have at
least one dog off-leash area. The benefits of places for dogs include the
obvious value to dogs and their owners, but they also provide benefits
to the community (see box: Benefits of Dog Parks).
PROVISION
Summerland has one fenced off-leash dog area, which is Dog Beach at
the southern end of Peach Orchard Beach Park. In addition, off-leash
dogs are permitted in Peach Orchard Park from October 1 to April 30
and there is an off-leash dog beach at Sun-Oka Beach Provincial Park,
located next to Summerland.
61
Benefits of Dog Parks
Allow dogs to exercise and socialize safely. Puppies and adult dogs need room to run, and
enclosed play areas permit them to do so while preventing them from endangering themselves
and others (for example, by running into the path of an oncoming vehicle). In addition, dogs who
are accustomed to playing with animals and people other than their owners are more likely to be
well-socialized and react well toward strangers.
Promote responsible dog ownership. Dog parks prevent off-leash animals from infringing on the
rights of other community residents and park users such as joggers, small children, and those who
may be fearful of dogs. Parks also make it easier for a city to enforce its leash laws, as resident
dog owners with park access have no reason to allow their canine companions off-leash when
outside of the park.
Provide an outlet for dog owners to socialize. Dog parks are a great place for owners to meet other
people with common interests. The love people share for their dogs reaches beyond economic and
social barriers and helps foster a sense of community. Park users also benefit from the opportunity
to ask questions of other owners and find solutions to problems they might be having with their
pet.
Make for a better community by promoting public health and safety. Well-exercised dogs are
better neighbours who are less likely to create a nuisance, bark excessively, and destroy property.
Their presence in the park, along with their owners, may also help deter crime.
Adapted from American Kennel Club, “Establishing a Dog Park in Your Community”.
The Summerland Dog Owners’ Association (SDOA) has identified a need

for more off-leash dog park areas in Summerland, and this was echoed
by community members during engagement for this Master Plan. Table
15 lists off-leash dog parks in several Okanagan communities. All of these
communities have multiple off-leash areas, which suggests that Summerland
may be relatively underserved for off-leash dog parks.
The SDOA says that the current off-leash dog park, Dog Beach in Peach
Orchard Beach Park, is too small and is only suitable for water-based play;
they say that dog owners would like a field where they can throw balls for
their dogs and dogs can run around. District landscaping staff indicate that
there are off-leash dogs on sports fields, which reduces the quality of turf
on the fields; dogs are prohibited from these fields by bylaw, but there is no
62
enforcement. An off-leash dog park with a field large enough to throw
a ball would provide an alternative venue for people who currently
exercise their dogs on sports fields.
The SDOA submitted a proposal to Summerland District Council in

November, 2016, requesting an additional permanent, year-round dog
off-leash area, an extension to the period when dogs are permitted
off-leash in Peach Orchard Beach Park and similar off-season access in
Powell Beach Park; accessibility improvements at Dog Beach; 2 garbage
cans and a bag dispenser at Cartwright Trail; and to not change zoning
on Conkle Mountain for commercial use. Accompanying the proposal
was a letter of support with 300 signatures.
The SDOA proposal suggested two potential sites for a permanent, year-
round dog off-leash area: the grassy area in Peach Orchard Park that is
currently used for off-leash dogs in the off-season and one of the ball
diamonds in Living Memorial Park. Preliminary investigation suggests
that neither site is completely suitable.
Appendix I provides more details on the SDOA proposal, as well as

suggested planning principles to guide the provision of amenities for
dogs.
TABLE 15: DOG PARKS IN SELECTED OKANAGAN

COMMUNITIES25
Dog parks
Dog parks
Population per 1,000
(number)
residents
Summerland 11,615 1 0.09
Kelowna 127,380 7 0.05

Lake Country 11,708 3 0.26
Osoyoos 5,085 5 0.98
Peachland 5,428 6 1.11
Penticton 33,761 6 0.18
Vernon 40,116 6 0.15
25
Sources: Kelowna: https://www.kelowna.ca/parks-recreation/parks-beaches/parks-beaches-listing; Lake Country:
http://www.okanaganway.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Bylaw-829-2012-Schedule-F-Dog-on-and-off-leash-
summary.pdf; Osoyoos: http://www.osoyoos.ca/content/dogs-parks#Off-Leash%20Park; Peachland: http://www.
peachland.ca/dog-parks; Penticton: http://www.penticton.ca/EN/meta/city-news/news-archives/2012-archives/new-
off-leash-dog-parks.html; http://www.penticton.ca/EN/main/community/parks-trails-beaches/dogs-in-parks.html;
Vernon: https://dogcontrol.ca/information/dogparks/
63
KEY FINDINGS
• Dog parks provide benefits to dogs and their owners and to the
broader community.
• Summerland has fewer off-leash dog parks than selected other

communities in the Okanagan, including smaller communities like
Peachland and Osoyoos.
• The community feels there is a need for additional off-leash dog park
areas; provision of a new off-leash dog park in a park/field setting
could help keep dogs off sports fields.
• The two sites proposed for a new full-time, year-round off-leash dog
park by the SDOA may not be suitable for an off-leash dog park but
there may be other suitable sites in Summerland.
RECOMMENDATIONS
4-44 Identify and explore options for one or more full-time, year-round
off-leash dog parks.
4-45 Apply planning principles, like the ones suggested in Appendix I, to

identifying and planning spaces for dogs.
4-46 Explore options for allowing dogs off-leash in designated areas of

parks during certain times of day or months of the year. Possibilities
might include Peach Orchard Campground, the Rodeo Grounds and
Powell Beach Park.
4-47 Explore the feasibility of making Dog Beach accessible to people

with mobility challenges. If the required construction is permissible
in the riparian zone and the cost is reasonable for the District to
incur, the project should be included in the capital budget for the
next 1-3 years. (This recommendation also appears in section 4.2.)
4-48 Provide garbage cans, dog waste bags and signage in parks and at
trailheads where dogs are permitted.
4-49 Revise the Dog Regulation and Impounding Bylaw (96-002)

to permit dogs on leash in all parks except on sports fields,
playgrounds, spray parks, skate parks, and beaches or at events
unless specifically permitted by the event organizer.
64
4.3.4 BEACHES AND WATER ACCESS
Summerland has four public beaches, two boat launches, the historic
Kiwanis Pier, the F+I docks at Rotary Beach, and walkways along the
Okanagan Lake waterfront. There is also one private marina and one
sailing club on District-owned land.
Water access is a priority for Summerland. The Official Community

Plan notes the policy of acquiring land adjacent to Okanagan Lake to
increase public access to the waterfront. Additionally, the Lower Town
Development Permit Area guidelines specify that “developments shall
provide continuous public access to the shoreline through the dedication
of lands a right of way for a connected public walkway”. The guidelines
also specify that “Lake activities should be animated introducing
increased commercial or public opportunities for recreational activities
along the shoreline”.
Because Summerland is a popular destination for tourists, residents

must share lakeshore parks, beaches and water access with visitors.
Currently, the lakeshore parks within Summerland combined with Sun-
Oka Provincial Park adjacent to Summerland are sufficient to meet the
needs of residents and visitors, but, in keeping with the OCP, the District
should pursue opportunities to acquire land adjacent to Okanagan Lake.
As discussed above in section 4.2, remediation of lakeshore parks from

the flooding of 2017 offers opportunity to improve ecological quality,
amenities and accessibility and to increase resilience to future flooding
to ensure access can be restored quickly after flood events.
KEY FINDINGS
• Summerland has public beaches, piers and walkways to provide

public access to the waterfront.
• Lakeshore access is a priority for Summerland. Summerland’s

OCP notes the policy of acquiring land adjacent to Okanagan Lake
to increase public access to the waterfront.
• Waterfront access is currently sufficient.
RECOMMENDATIONS
4-50 Pursue opportunities to acquire land adjacent to Okanagan Lake

to increase public access to the waterfront.
65
4-51 Continue to uphold the Lower Town Development Permit Area

guidelines that provide for public access to the shoreline and for
increased commercial or public opportunities for recreational
activities along the shoreline.
4.3.5 TREES
Trees offer significant environmental and human health benefits. They

filter air pollutants, absorb carbon from the atmosphere (helping to
mitigate greenhouse gas emissions), reduce heat, provide shade, provide
mental health benefits, provide habitat, help to control erosion and
provide aesthetic appeal.
Summerland should develop an Urban Forest Strategy. Better care

in selection of tree species in the downtown area is needed and
there is potential for street tree planning in new subdivisions/ major
developments. Funds available through environmental grant programs
and from the District’s Tree Fund Reserve account could be used to
plant additional trees along streets and in parks. The following parks
would benefit from a tree management strategy to address native
species management and planting planning: Powell Beach Park, Beaver
Street Park, Butler Street Park, Crescent Beach, Kinsmen Park/Holler
Riparian Area, and Peach Orchard Campground, as well as all natural
areas parks.26
It is important to conduct hazard tree assessments in Summerland’s

parks and along trails. This should be done regularly, in conformity with
best practices and, once it is available, in the context of the Urban Forest
Strategy. 27
RECOMMENDATIONS
4-52 Develop an Urban Forest Strategy.
4-53 Plant trees along streets and in parks. Environmental grant

programs and the District’s Tree Fund Reserve account could be
sources of funding.
4-54 Undertake hazard tree assessments in District parks and along

trails. The hazard tree assessments should be done in the
context of the Urban Forest Strategy, once it is available.
26
Alison Peatt, SOSCP Environmental Planner, providing environmental planning support services to SOSCP local
government partners. Personal communication, February 23, 2018.
27
The hazard tree assessments should not be postponed until an Urban Forest Strategy is in place.
66
4.4 MAINTENANCE
Summerland’s parks are well-maintained, and staff do a good job with
the resources that are available. Arena staff assist the landscaping crew
in summer, which is their off-season; this works well. Landscaping crew
say however that one additional seasonal (Mar-Oct) staff person with
landscaping experience would allow them to maintain high standards for
landscaping.
Staff indicate that aging maintenance equipment is a challenge. They are

able to keep up with replacement of small equipment, but large equipment
is more expensive and therefore difficult to replace. Turf management would
be improved with purchasing a top-dresser and rotary mower for fields,
but this equipment should only be used if the Dale Meadows parking lot is
paved. Purchase of a top-dresser is budgeted for 2018. An ongoing need
is the upgrade of the District’s aging irrigation systems from hydraulic to
electrical. This is addressed in the capital budget.
Another challenge for parks maintenance is the low level of enforcement

of parks bylaws. For instance, dogs cause damage to sports fields. They are
prohibited on sports fields, but there is no enforcement. Another example
is camping in the Memorial Park bandshell, which could be ameliorated by
enclosing the stage.
As discussed above, sports field users have identified some deficiencies

at Dale Meadows Park. There should be regular communication between
District staff and field users on their respective responsibilities and
requirements for keeping fields well-maintained. The District should consider
developing guidelines on the responsibilities of field users, including lead
times for booking fields and cancelling bookings and the contributions of
field users to maintenance (e.g., watering ball fields before dragging and
between games).
Service clubs and volunteer organizations have provided a lot of Summerland’s

parks infrastructure. There is a need to ensure that infrastructure meets
safety standards and that it can be maintained by District staff (materials and
specifications are compatible with District equipment and staff capacity). The
District should develop a list of priorities for donated infrastructure/projects
as well as standards for future donations to ensure they meet standards and
the requirements of the District.
Organizationally, the parks landscaping crew is within the Work & Utilities
department, while the Recreation department is responsible for booking
fields and is the primary point of contact for user groups and members of
the public. Both units have information that is important for planning and
resource allocation, so it is important to ensure there is regular contact and
collaboration on work planning, budget development, and priority-setting
67
for parks. The District’s new asset management plan should help with capital
planning.
KEY FINDINGS
• Summerland’s parks are well-maintained, and staff utilize current

resources effectively.
• An additional seasonal landscaping crew member would allow the

crew to maintain high standards for landscaping.
• Challenges for parks maintenance include aging equipment and

low enforcement of parks bylaws such as the prohibition of dogs on
sports fields.
• Regular communication with sports field users and development of

guidelines would support field maintenance.
• Service clubs and community organizations have historically donated

a lot of Summerland’s parks infrastructure. Standards are needed to
ensure that donated infrastructure meets safety standards and can
be maintained by District staff.
• The separation of parks responsibilities between the Works &

Utilities and Recreation departments mean that it is important to
ensure there is regular contact and collaboration between the two
departments on work planning, budget development, and priority-
setting for parks.
RECOMMENDATIONS
4-55 Consider hiring additional landscaping staff.
4-56 Purchase a top-dresser as budgeted for 2018.
4-57 Ensure there is regular communication between parks maintenance

staff and sports field users. Consider developing guidelines on the
responsibilities of field users.
4-58 Develop a list of priorities for donated infrastructure/projects.
4-59 Develop standards for donated infrastructure/projects to ensure

they meet safety standards and the requirements of the District.
4-60 Create an asset management plan for major park amenities and
infrastructure.
68
5
Trails
Walking is the most popular recreation activity of Summerland residents, followed closely by cycling,
and Summerland’s many trails are widely used by residents and visitors. Residents would like to have a
more walkable community with trail links throughout the community, especially for connections from
Upper Town to Lower Town beaches. There is also a desire to see a commuter bike route to Penticton.
Summerland’s network of mountain bike trails is growing in popularity, resulting in Summerland

becoming a destination for the growing sport. Its appealing terrain would support further expansion
of the sport. As well, the District also hosts several cycle events including the Mountain Bike Test of
Humanity Championship and Gran Fondo, which also provide significant tourism benefits.
The District of Summerland intends to undertake a Trails Master Plan, so this chapter will provide an
overview of Summerland’s provision of trails, descriptions of the most prominent trails, and a brief
discussion of key issues related to trails including permitted uses, protection of environmental values,
and connectivity. More detailed analysis, recommendations and mapping will be undertaken for the
Trails Master Plan.
Appendix J provides information on Summerland’s most prominent trails.
69
5.1 TRAILS PROVISION

Summerland has a large number of trails, for hiking, biking, horseback riding,
and off-road vehicles. Figure 14 is a preliminary map of Summerland’s trails,
using information currently available. More complete and authoritative
mapping should be undertaken as part of a future Trails Master Plan.
Table 16 compares the extent of Summerland’s multi-use trails and paved

bike paths with the average and median values for similarly-sized BC
communities. Summerland has considerably more kilometres of multi-
use trails than other BC communities, and has a below average but above
median inventory of paved bike paths.
TABLE 16: TRAILS COMPARISON
17 BC municipalities with
population 5,000-15,000
Summerland
Average Median
Multi Use Trails28 (km) 76.9 22.8 10.0

Paved Bicycle Paths (km) 5.0 6.2 4.0
28
Note that this includes 61 km for the Summerland portion of the TransCanada Trail. The portion of the trail that is
actually within the District of Summerland needs to be determined, and the trails total revised accordingly.
70
Figure 14: Summerland’s trails (preliminary)
71
5.2 KEY ISSUES

This section provides an overview of the key issues for Summerland’s trails,
with the expectation that these issues will be addressed in a more fulsome
way in the Trails Master Plan. Key issues arise from the location of trails, often
in environmentally significant or sensitive areas; the different and sometimes
conflicting uses of trails; development and maintenance standards and trail
safety; and the need to ensure connectivity to parks and other trails to
facilitate active transportation and provide wildlife corridors.
5.2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRAILS AND

TRAIL USE 29
Many of Summerland’s trails are located in natural areas, and indeed an

important attraction and benefit to the users of these trails is the ability to
spend time in a natural setting. It is important to recognize that trails and
even low impact activities like hiking can have a negative impact on natural
areas. Impacts include:
• Habitat fragmentation, degradation (e.g. spread of invasive plants)

and loss of native vegetation including at risk plants, shrubs and
wildlife trees (to trail maintenance, perceived hazards and increased
accessibility for firewood cutting); 30
• Disturbance to dens from trail building; mortality and damage to

snakes through persecution or crushing by tires; 31
• Direct persecution of wildlife, bird nests, burrows and other places

wildlife reside; disturbance of grasslands, open forests, wetlands and
shoreline habitats by domestic animals; 32
29
http://www.academia.edu/337961/Leung_Y.-F._and_Marion_J._L._2000_._Recreation_impacts_and_management_
in_wilderness_a_state-of-knowledge_review._In_Cole_D._N._McCool_S._F._Borrie_W._T._and_OLoughlin_J._
comps._Wilderness_Science_in_a_Time_of_Change_Conference_-_Volume_5_Wilderness_Ecosystems_Threats_and_
Management_May_23-27_1999_Missoula_MT_pp._23-48_._Proc._RMRS-P-15-VOL-5._Ogden_UT_USDA_Forest_
Service_Rocky_Mountain_Research_Station
30
Various references document impacts to trees e.g. https://www.cabi.org/leisuretourism/news/16160 and http://
www.pacificbio.org/publications/vegetation/state_parks/wa_east/Mt_Spokane_Trails_PBI_report.pdf
31
Concerns about this and documented occurrences of impacts are provided in the recovery plan for the Western
Rattlesnake, the Great Basin Gophersnake and the Desert Nightsnake in Canada https://www.registrelep-sararegistry.
gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=B6D9C7DE-1&offset=2&toc=show
3
Various references document impacts of dogs on wildlife. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301800852_
Impacts_of_dogs_on_wildlife_and_water_quality
Lenth, B., Knight, R.L., Brennan, M.E. 2008. The effects of dogs on wildlife communities. Natural Areas Journal
28(3):218-227
Miller, S.G., Knight, R.L., Miller, C.K. 2001. Responses to pedestrians and dogs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29(1):124-132
72
• Increased fire risk;33 and
• Disturbance and increased human-wildlife conflict when people and

their domestic animals enter natural areas and perceive threats from
wildlife. When conflicts occur, these can result in damage or death of
wildlife; 34 and
• Increased noise disturbance of habitat associated with trails use.35
Popular activities on trails include hiking, biking and downhill mountain

biking, horseback riding, and riding off-highway vehicles (OHV) like ATVS
and dirt bikes. There are a number of sensitive species and habitats impacted
by ATV use, including grasslands rare plant communities, sensitive wetlands
and riparian areas occupied by ground nesting birds, animals in burrows
and sensitive species like snakes or amphibians that are at risk. Managing
recreation use generally in grasslands is challenging because the terrain
is open and new trail creation is easy. Wetlands are also vulnerable to
ATV use, though mudbogging. Because so much wetland has been lost
to development and infill, there is no ability to absorb further impacts to
wetlands and sensitive wetland species like spadefoot and tiger salamander.35
To help avoid these impacts, ATV/dirtbike use in the Summerland should be
limited to existing, designated trails.
Even more passive recreation activities like mountain biking and hiking
can have negative impacts, and should be limited to areas where there is
less potential for impact on ecologically sensitive or significant habitats or
species.
To minimize the potential for negative environmental impacts, recreation

in natural areas, and particularly near ecologically sensitive or significant
areas, should be carefully planned. An important first step is to develop
an understanding and inventory of ecological values in Summerland’s
parks and natural areas. The South Okanagan Similkameen Conservation
Program (SOSCP) is a valuable partner for this work, as are local naturalists
and environmental groups such as the Summerland Environmental Science
Group, and trail user groups and clubs.
Another critical task is the mapping of existing trails. Some preliminary

mapping has been recently done as part of the District’s asset management
33
This reference documents increased fire risk near roads and developments: https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/
influences-of-forest-roads-on-the-spatial-patterns-of-human-and-1AmGBtB91J
34
https://www.nps.gov/goga/learn/management/upload/-1979-Reed-and-Merenlender_2008.pdf
34
Barber, J.R., Crooks, K.R., Fristrup, K.M. 2009. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in
Ecology & Evolution 25(3):180-189
35
This paragraph is based on personal communication with Allison Peatt, SOSCP Environmental Planner, providing
environmental planning support services to SOSCP local government partners. December 24, 2017.
73
planning. This mapping should be completed as part of the development

of the Trails Master Plan. Then, in collaboration with the SOSCP, the District
should determine which trails or portions of trails impact ecologically
sensitive or significant areas and decommission or reroute those trails.
Involving trails user groups in the process will help ensure that trail users
understand and respect the positioning of trails and the need to protect
ecological values.
5.2.2 CONFLICTING USES
During engagement for this Master Plan, trail users did not indicate that
conflicts among different users is a serious problem, but did note that clarity
on permitted uses on trails through sanctioning and signage would help
avoid conflicts. Involving trail user groups, the SOSCP and environmental
groups like the Summerland Environmental Science Group in designating
permitted uses on Summerland’s trails will help ensure that rules governing
use make sense and are respected by trail users. To the extent possible,
current and historical uses should be respected.
Once permitted uses on trails have been determined, the District should post
signage that provides information about wayfinding and permitted uses.
The District could also collaborate with the SOSCP, trails user groups, and
environmental groups to develop and distribute education and information
materials including maps of approved trails, trail etiquette and rules, and
Summerland’s natural areas and the ecosystems, plants and animals found
in them.
5.2.3 TRAIL MAINTENANCE STANDARDS
To ensure that trails are as safe and accessible as possible, best practices
should be used in developing and maintaining trails. The District should
consider developing standards for trail construction and maintenance, which
can be used by District staff as well as by volunteers and donors of trails
infrastructure such as service clubs. These standards should be developed
in the context of the Trails Master Plan.
5.2.4 CONNECTIVITY
The importance of connectivity was identified in engagement with staff and

the community for this Master Plan and is in discussed in Summerland’s
Official Community Plan, Strategic Plan, and Cultural Plan. Connectivity
involves the linkages between parks and other areas, along trails, bike
lanes and sidewalks, to facilitate active transportation (walking, cycling,
74
skateboarding, riding a scooter, etc.). Connectivity can also refer to corridors
used by wildlife to travel between different habitat areas.
In developing the Trails Master Plan, the District should aim to create
a network of trails, bike lanes/paths and sidewalks that connects
neighbourhoods, parks and open spaces, and community amenities to
provide active transportation and recreation opportunities. The network
should avoid environmentally sensitive or hazard areas and should not
facilitate access to these areas.
The District applied in 2018 to BikeBC for funding for a Cycling Network Plan.
Given the importance of active transportation for the health of residents and
the community, a Cycling Network Plan is a valuable tool for the District. If
the District’s application to BikeBC is not successful, the Dstrict should seek
funding from other sources.
During engagement for this Master Plan, the Summerland ATV Club
requested staging areas so that ATV users can access the amenities in town.
During development of the Trails Master Plan, the District should consider
potential staging areas and road corridors suitable for ATVs to enter town.
75
5.3 TRAIL USER GROUPS

There are several active trail clubs groups in the Summerland area including
Trails of the Okanagans Society, the South Okanagan Trail Alliance, the
Summerland ATV Club, the South Okanagan Dirt Bike Club, the South
Okanagan Crony Club, TriPower Triathlon Club, and the Summerland Rodeo
Grounds Equine Development Committee. Additionally, Summerland’s
service clubs like Rotary, Kinsmen and Lions have contributed to development
of trails such as the Centennial Trail.
In engagement for this Master Plan, trails users identified a pressing need
for clarity on permitted uses as well as signage to provide wayfinding and
promotion of Summerland’s many trails (discussed further in section 5.4.2
below). The South Okanagan Dirt Bike Club noted that, because many areas
are off-limits to dirt bikes, there is pressure on the remaining areas, making
management and proper signage important.
Trails users also point to the need for management planning of natural areas,
similar to what is currently under way for Giant’s Head Mountain Park.
Trail users would like opportunities for collaboration with each other, and
with the District. Collaboration with these groups would allow the District
to access their in-kind and financial support for creating and maintaining
trails – these groups have access to grants and are able to secure in-kind
contributions of labour and materials from their members. The Trails Master
Plan should identify mechanisms and processes for collaboration between
the District and organizations and groups with an interest in trails, including
trail user groups and clubs, environmental and naturalist groups, nearby
municipalities, the Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen (RDOS),
and the provincial government and other stakeholders in creating and
maintaining the trail network; this might include creating standards for trail
construction and maintenance and programs for volunteer work parties and
trail stewards and ambassadors.
76
5.4 KEY FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
KEY FINDINGS
• Summerland is well-served for trails, with more kilometers of trails

than the average and median for similar-sized BC communities.
Summerland is below average but above the median for paved bike
paths.
• The District of Summerland intends to prepare a Trails Master Plan.
• The District of Summerland has applied for funding to create a

Cycling Network Plan.
• Trail users are contributing to the regional tourism economy and

there are opportunities to expand service as the sport continues to
grow.
• There are several active trails user groups and clubs in the
Summerland area, as well as service clubs that have contributed to
development of trails
• Trail users identified a pressing need for clarity on permitted uses

and signage for wayfinding and promotion of trails and information
on permitted uses.
• Trail users identify a need for management planning of natural areas,

similar to the planning that is under way for Giant’s Head Mountain.
• Trail users can have negative impacts on natural areas, so recreation

and trails in natural areas should be carefully planned to avoid and
minimize impacts on ecologically sensitive or significant habitats,
plants or animals.
• Conflicts among different trail users is not a serious problem in

Summerland, but clarity on permitted uses will help avoid potential
conflict.
• The importance of connectivity was identified in engagement with

staff and the community for this Master Plan and is in discussed in
Summerland’s Official Community Plan, Strategic Plan, and Cultural
Plan.
77
• Connectivity facilitates active transportation and can provide

corridors for wildlife to move between natural areas.
• ATV users would like staging areas and access to amenities in town.
RECOMMENDATIONS
5-1 Develop a Trails Master Plan to identify existing trails and missing
links within Summerland and in surrounding areas, to plan a trail
network that:
–– Connects neighbourhoods, parks and open spaces, and

community amenities;
–– Provides active transportation and recreation opportunities,

and
–– Avoids environmentally sensitive or hazard areas and does not

facilitate access to these areas.
5-2 Involve trails user groups, environmental groups, and other

stakeholders with an interest in trails in development of the Trails
Master Plan.
5-3 The Trails Master Plan should identify mechanisms and processes
for collaboration between the District and organizations and groups
with an interest in trails.
5-4 The Trails Master Plan should establish design standards for various
intended user groups as well as maintenance standards.
5-5 Following development of the Trails Master Plan, the District should
implement signage to provide clarity on permitting uses on trails
as well as wayfinding and promotion of trails (and parks). Signage
should have a consistent look and feel, with Summerland branding.
5-6 Develop a Cycling Network Plan.
5-7 Collaborate with the South Okanagan Similkameen Conservation

Program (SOSCP), local naturalists and environmental groups such
as the Summerland Environmental Science Group, and trail user
groups and clubs to understand and inventory ecological values in
Summerland’s parks and natural areas.
78
6
Recreation
Facilities
6.1 DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF INDOOR RECREATION

FACILITIES
The following section provides an inventory, evaluation and assessment of Summerland’s primary
indoor recreation facilities and their ability to meet current and future demand. A comparative analysis
with towns and districts of similar population size, a review of the facility’s condition, assessment of
future capacity and the results of community input have all guided the recommendations in this report.
6.1.1 INVENTORY AND DESCRIPTION
The District of Summerland manages two key indoor recreational facilities: the Summerland Aquatic
and Fitness Centre and the Summerland Arena Complex and Curling Club.
Seven additional indoor recreation facilities are available in the community and operated by others
including:
• Centre Stage Theatre. Theatre located at Summerland Secondary School with 295 seats,
state of the art sound and lighting equipment, grand piano, orchestra pit and dressing
rooms. Theatre is used for concerts, live theatre, movies, speakers and regular school drama
productions.
79
• Harold Simpson Memorial Youth Centre. The Summerland Youth

Centre Association has a mandate to operate the Centre for the
benefit of the District of Summerland, but youth in particular. The
Centre makes space available for youth groups such as the Okanagan
Boys and Girls Club, Cadets, Scouts and Guides, service clubs and
community rentals. The land and building are owned by the District.
• Summerland Asset Development Initiative (SADI) Youth Club. SADI is

a non-profit organization that provides opportunities, activities, and
support for Summerland youth and families. The District owns the
facility and provides operating grants.
• Summerland Drop In Recreation Centre. A drop in centre and

programs. The District operates Nifty-Fifty fitness programs within
the facility.
• Summerland Baptist Church. Provides a gymnasium for community

use.
• Summerland School District 67. There are two elementary schools,

one middle school and one secondary school in Summerland with
gymnasiums that can be rented for public use or programmed by the
Summerland Recreation Department.
• Lakeshore Racquets Club. The non-profit society operates an indoor

facility with 2 squash courts and 3 outdoor tennis courts and also
offers fitness classes and venue rentals.
• Summerland Badminton Club. The members hold drop-in casual to

league games within a custom designed historic 1934 building with
two regulation sized courts.
6.1.2 PUBLIC INPUT
Just over half of residents surveyed said they use the Summerland Aquatic
Centre and Centre Stage Theatre, while 40% said they use the Arena, and
smaller percentages using the youth centres and Baptist Church gym (see
Figure 15).
The aquatic centre, arena, Baptist Church gym, and Youth Centre are used
most frequently, with the large majority of users in each case using the
facility at least once a month or more often. The Centre Stage Theatre and
SADI Youth Club are used infrequently (see Figure 16).
80
Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities Used
Centre Stage
Summerland A
Centre Stage Theatre 56% 46% Centre are the
used public in
Summerland Aquatic & Fitness Centre 52% 66% cultural faciliti
Summerland Arena Complex & Curling The Summerla

40% 40%
Club
and Curling Cl
Youth Centre 15% 14%
Approximatel
residents do n
Summerland Baptist Church gym 9% 3%
listed public in
Summerland Asset Development or cultural fac
1% 0%
Initiative (SADI) Youth Club
Online respon
None of these 21% 19% facilities does
Figure 15: Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities Used
significantly fr
telephone res
Frequency of Using Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities

Base: Aquatic
Total Random
This ch
Summerland & (n=200) Phone (n=106) 29% 10% 17% 13% 11% 20%
use am
Fitness Centre Online (n=176) 49% 14% 9% 10% 11% 7%
Q.5) Which of the following indoor public recreation or cultural facilities do you use? Health
Summerland Arena Phone (n=80) 22% 13% 18% 14% 7% 26% used m
Complex & Curling Club Online (n=106) 19% 24% 11% 13% 26% 7% large m
case us
a mont
Phone (n=17*) 14% 59% 10% 17%
Summerland Baptist
Church Gym Online (n=8*) 13% 50% 13% 13% 13% Cultura
Centre
Phone (n=32) 9% 23% 6 12% 14% 37% Centre
Youth Centre to be u
Online (n=37) 11% 24% 11% 11% 24% 16%
to thre
Phone (n=117) 2 8% 39% 51%
Centre Stage Theatre In mos
Online (n=122) 3 10% 38% 48% signific
among
Summerland Asset Phone (n=2*) 59% 41%
Development Initiative Online (n=0)
(SADI) Youth Club
More than once a week About once a week

About every 2-3 weeks About once a month
About once every 2-3 months Less often
Figure 16: Frequency of Use of Indoor Facilities
81
Most people who currently use Summerland’s indoor recreation facilities are
satisfied with them, although people who responded to the online survey
tended to be less satisfied than people who responded to the telephone
survey (see Figure 17).
Satisfaction with Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities Total

Satisfied
Centre Stage Theatre Phone (n=117) 60% 36% 4 95%

This chart
satisfaction
Online (n=122) 34% 42% 15% 5 3 76%
of each fac
Summerland Aquatic & Phone (n=106) 46% 38% 8% 7% 84% The large m
Fitness Centre
Online (n=176) 17% 34% 13% 26% 9% 2 51% residents t
the recrea
Summerland Arena Phone (n=80) 33% 46% 15% 6 facilities ar
79%
Complex & Curling Club somewhat
Online (n=106) 22% 46% 13% 11% 5 3 68%
Satisfactio
Youth Centre Phone (n=32) 54% 40% 33 94% significant
Online (n=37) 22% 38% 24% 16% 60% or among o
with the ex
Summerland Baptist Phone (n=17*) 53% 27% 11% 10% Summerla
80%
Church Gym Fitness Cen
Online (n=8*) 50% 25% 13% 13% 75%
online resp
Summerland Asset somewhat
Phone (n=2*) 100% 100%
Development Initiative express so
Online (n=0) n/a dissatisfac
(SADI) Youth Club
the teleph
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Base: Total that use the facility Very Dissatisfied
*CAUTION: Small Base Sizes
Figure 17:
Q.7) Satisfaction with
How satisfied are youPublic
with... Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities
82
6.1.3 SUMMERLAND AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTRE
A description of the main features of the Summerland Aquatic and

Fitness Centre and the typical programs offered at the facility is provided
in Table 17.
TABLE 17: SUMMERLAND AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTRE
Description and Amenities
• Built in 1975
• Some upgrades to the boiler, lighting, filter system, solar panels
• Lane 25 m pool. Shallow end only 3 ft. deep (limits competitions)
• New 2200 sq. ft. weightroom added in 1996
• 10 person hot tub
• Changerooms, dry sauna
• Recreation centre office and cashier
• 1 office shared for first aid equipment storage
• 1 small multi-use/meeting room
• Located on school board property
Typical programs
• Swim lessons, competitive swim program, master’s swim program

• Aquafit classes, rehab programs (Recope)
• Fitness classes
• Community events (Action Fest, Halloween, Christmas party)
• Recreation classes (Pilates, kids programs)
CAPACITY
• Staff estimates indicate that the pool receives 50,000-80,000

total users per year. This is typical of small communities. Larger
communities may experience upwards of 200,000 users per year.
• Fitness room/ classes receive approximately 2,000 visitors per

month. The 2200 sq. ft. room with 35 stations has the capacity
for approximately 6,000 visitors per month.
• Facility is open extensively to the public 105 hours per week;

reduced during the two summer months and for annual
shutdown.
Table 18 on the next page provides an analysis of the strengths and

weaknesses of the aquatic centre.
83
TABLE 18: SUMMERLAND AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTRE –

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
• Centrally located in community and close to • Limited parking

schools • Notable maintenance problems developing
• Well maintained facility (air handling unit, hot water showers and floor
• Fitness room is spacious and well equipped cracks, building leaks)
for its originally intended use as a weight and • Pool no longer provides the features and
cardio room only; not adequately sized as facilities found in modern pools such as
currently used for exercise programs universal/family changerooms, leisure and
• Very well used by the community with high accessibility amenities or preschool teach pool
levels of community satisfaction reported in • Very limited ability to host events. Poor
the survey spectator seating and deck space
• Some energy upgrades with solar panels and • Cashier/visitor control station is poorly located
LED lighting and inefficient
• Facility has capacity for increased use during • No separate washrooms for the pool or
non-primetime hours (mid-afternoons, late weightroom (limits entry control)
evenings and summer days) • Recreation and support offices are undersized
• Lack of multi-purpose recreation spaces and
gymnasium for fitness classes
• Some community dissatisfaction expressed
with the facility. Residents are going outside the
community to use other facilities or programs
• The pool is used to capacity during prime time
hours
84
KEY FINDINGS
• At 42 years old, the Aquatic and Fitness Centre facility is nearing

the end of its serviceable life. According to the BCRPA (2009)
the facility is at Stage 5. During this stage, facilities typically
become more costly to operate and maintain. As well, large
scale rehabilitation or replacement may be required in order to
continue to serve the community.
• There is no detailed facility audit to guide long term facility

management or a long term replacement strategy.
• The pool and fitness rooms are used to capacity during all prime
time hours. Key programs such as aquafit, swim lessons and
Recope are full with waiting lists for future programs.
• The pool is a traditional single tank design which is outdated and

lacks many of the modern features and amenities such as family
changerooms, family leisure space, shallow teach pool, accessible
entry, family changerooms and swim competition space.
• The weightroom has to be used for fitness classes, which is not

conducive to either use.
• While overall community satisfaction is currently high, there is an

expressed desire for improvements in the aquatic facilities and
programs.
• The centre lacks the support space typical of modern recreation

complexes including multi-use recreation rooms, fitness rooms
and gymnasium, which helps create the one- stop centre for
everyone in the community. Use of the weightroom for fitness
classes reduces program options.
• Due to limited space on schoolboard property, there is likely no

potential to expand or rebuild a suitably sized community centre
at its current location.
85
RECOMMENDATIONS
6-1 Conduct a detailed facility audit of the entire Aquatic and Fitness
Centre building, its structure and plant including compliance with
municipal and provincial code requirements.
6-2 Develop an asset lifecycle plan and adjust budgets accordingly.
6-3 Develop a long term strategy for the eventual replacement of the
Aquatic and Fitness Centre with multipurpose rooms including
plans, designs, confirm location, public support and cost estimates.
6-4 Replace or upgrade the pool per the long-term strategy.
6-5 Implement a facility replacement reserve to support the eventual

replacement of the facility.
6-6 If the estimated life expectancy of the pool is greater than 10 years,
add a UV system to reduce chlorination and maintenance costs.
6-7 Review the pool operating hours and explore opportunities to

increase use of the pool and increase revenue.
6.1.4 SUMMERLAND ARENA COMPLEX AND CURLING CLUB
A description of the main features of the Summerland Arena Complex and

Curling Club and the typical programs offered at the facility is provided in
Table 19.
86
TABLE 19: SUMMERLAND ARENA COMPLEX AND CURLING CLUB
Description and Amenities
• Built in 1976
• Upgrades include; chiller, arena boards, condenser, heat reclaim system, DDC controls, LED Lighting,
Dehumidification, seating, accessibility, and safety improvement in the plant room
• NHL regulation size 200 x 85 foot ice sheet
• Upper concourse within the arena
• 5 dressing rooms plus junior team trailer
• Seating for 875 spectators
• Concession
• Curling rink operates off the arena plant. Has 4 ice sheets, each one 146 ft. long and 14 ft. wide.
• Curling rink is operated by the curling club through a lease agreement. City assists with capital costs
• Second floor has a 3,520 sq. ft. Banquet Room and Kitchen with capacity to host 269 people; with
commercial kitchen and bar facilities and a curling lounge
Typical programs
• ARENA ICE SHEET: Minor hockey, senior’s hockey, ladies hockey, figure skating, learn to skate
programs, grad ceremony, Action Fest dance, lacrosse, ball hockey, Air Cadets
• CURLING RINK: League games, lessons, bonspiels, summer dry floor options, Fall Fair
• BANQUET ROOM: private bookings (weddings, Christmas parties), recreation programs (Tai Chi,
Zumba, yoga, pre-school programs), meetings
CAPACITY
• Banquet room is not used to full capacity but cannot bump bookings
in favour of recreation programs.
• Ice arena used to full capacity during prime time hours. Community
groups estimate they are collectively short 15 hours per week and
use Penticton ice arenas instead. Expansion into non-prime time
hours may be needed in the future.
Table 20 on the next page provides an analysis of the strengths and

weaknesses of the arena.
87
TABLE 20: SUMMERLAND ARENA COMPLEX AND CURLING CLUB -

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
• Well maintained facility • Limited parking

• Very well used by the community. The second • Arena used to full capacity during prime time
highest attended recreation facility with high • No city staff presence for recreation programs
levels of community satisfaction reported in • Washrooms/changerooms, no sprinklers in the
the survey banquet room (or throughout the building)
• Functional design with arena, curling and • User groups indicate a lack of community group
banquet facility storage space
• On city owned land with future expansion • Some community dissatisfaction expressed
capability with the facility. Residents are going outside the
• Plant may be able to support an adjoining community to use other facilities or programs
second sheet of ice or an outdoor rink • No capacity for an indoor walking track
• Energy upgrades like LED lighting and heating
loop to RCMP building
KEY FINDINGS
• At 41 years old, the facility is nearing the end of its serviceable life.
According to the BCRPA (2009) the facility is at Stage 5. During this
stage, facilities typically become more costly to operate and maintain.
As well, large scale rehabilitation or replacement may be required in
order to continue to serve the community.
• No detailed facility audit to guide long term facility management or a

long term replacement strategy.
• The arena ice facility is currently meeting most of the needs of the
community. Prime time ice time is presently near capacity. Survey
respondents expressed interest in expansion and updating the
facility.
• Eventually a second sheet of ice may be required to meet community

demands.
88
RECOMMENDATIONS
6-8 Conduct a detailed facility audit of the entire building, its structure
and plant including compliance with municipal and provincial code
requirements.
6-9 Develop a facility maintenance management plan. Adjust budgets

accordingly.
6-10 Implement upgrades to the washrooms and changerooms.
6-11 Explore with the Junior ”B” club regarding improving their
washroom/changeroom facility.
6-12 Continue to upgrade the concession and concession services.
6-13 Develop a long term strategy for the eventual replacement of the
Arena Complex. Monitor community use levels of the curling rink
over the long term.
6-14 Replace or upgrade the arena per the long-term strategy.
6-15 Implement a facility replacement reserve to support the eventual

replacement of the facility.
6-16 Conduct a needs assessment and cost analysis for a potential

second arena.
6-17 Explore options for increasing recreational opportunities such as

roller derby in both the arena and the curling club during the spring
dry floor months.
89
6.2 INDOOR FACILITY SUPPLY

There are no nationally adopted guidelines in Canada for the provision of
indoor recreation facilities. Instead municipalities have adopted a more
community-specific planning approach based upon demand, level of
use, financial capability and availability of facilities within the region.
Table 21 provides a comparison of indoor recreation facilities available

within seven other BC communities of similar population size.36 Overall,
the analysis highlights that Summerland provides comparable types of
indoor facilities with the possible exception of a community centre.
However, with so many variables in terms of the number and type
of facilities, location of communities, demographic makeup, etc., any
further interpretation needs to be done cautiously with further analysis.
Another measure of recreation facility supply is the gross square footage

(GSF) of municipally provided recreation spaces per capita. Together,
Summerland’s Arena complex at 70,000 square feet and the Aquatic
complex at 20,000 square feet provide a total of 90,000 GSF of public
recreation space, producing a current supply of 7.74 GSF of public
recreation space per capita. The consultant’s previous studies have
found a range from 6 - 11 GSF per capita, indicating that Summerland
is about midrange in its facility supply. Within the 10 year timeframe of
this study, assuming a conservative growth rate of .5%, the population
will increase by approximately 700 people, at which time the ratio will
decline to be approximately 7.29 GSF per capita, if no new amenities are
added. With a high growth rate of 2% the increase of 3,000 people will
reduce the available community space to an average of 6.10GSF, which
is a the bottom of the range of service in comparable communities.
6.2.1 ANALYSIS
The analysis highlights that Summerland has the typical type and amount
of indoor recreational amenities comparable to other similar-sized cities
in BC. However, each city has unique differences in response to all the
factors that shape supply and demand.
Summerland has also followed a very traditional approach to providing

indoor facilities. The District has developed two core facilities, the pool
and the arena, and then has provided support or encouragement to
community groups to develop other more specialized facilities such as
the youth centre, Summerland Drop In Recreation Centre, and tennis
Info collected from municipal websites and parks and recreation masterplan reports, consultant’s data.
36
90
TABLE 21: COMPARISON OF INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY SUPPLY BY POPULATION
Summerland Dawson Terrace Powell Quesnel Prince Nelson Williams

(11,280) Creek (11,486) River (10,007) Rupert (10,320) Lake
(11,583) (13,165) (12,508) (10,832)
Arena 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Arts Centre 1 1 1 1 1 1
Community
1 1 1 1 2 1
Centre
Curling Rink 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Indoor pool 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Museum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Senior Centre 1 1 1 1 1 1
Theatre 1 1 1 1 1 1
Youth Centre 1 1 1 1 1
and badminton clubs. From a facility perspective, these adjunct buildings

are key to meeting the recreational needs of the community.
This approach has also meant that not all desired indoor facilities are available
or are not available in ways or means that meet community expectations.
The findings from the telephone survey indicate that current recreational
facilities are not fully meeting resident’s needs. A notable 21% of survey
respondents do not use any recreation facility in Summerland. Further, lack
of facilities and lack of programs and services were listed as reasons for
not participating in recreational activities. A very high percentage (34%)
of respondents indicate that they use private indoor facilities or facilities
located in other cities (see Figure 18). The reasons commonly offered for
using other facilities include; bigger or better facility or one that provides
more amenities (50%), wider variety of programs or activities (39%) or prefer
the atmosphere of other facilities (25%) (See Table 22).
91
Use of Private Indoor Facilities or Those Located in Other Cities

Phone Survey Online Survey One-third of r
privately ope
those that are
Yes
(34%).
56%
Yes No A similar prop

66%
34% responding o
No same (41%, n
44% these sample
Figure18: Use of Private Indoor Facilities or Those in Located in Other Cities
TABLE 22: REASONS FOR USING PRIVATE FACILITIES AND

THOSE IN OTHER CITIES
Phone Online
Base: Total Random (n=200) (66) (149)
% %
Q.8a) Do you use privately operated indoor facilities (e.g., Pilates/ yoga centre) or go to other cities to use
Better facilities
facilities (like Penticton pool)? (i.e. more options, bigger) 50 60
Variety of programs/ actives available 39 20
Atmosphere (type of clientele, facility
25 6
amenities, etc.)
Hours of operation/ schedules 21 16
No facilities available locally 17 8
Convenience to another location 18 5
More affordable 9 7
Quality of instructors/ staff 4 5
No reason - 13
92
One facility lacking in the community is a gymnasium for indoor sports. The
secondary school gym is booked to capacity. The elementary and middle
school gyms and the Baptist Church are available only after school hours
and at additional costs but cannot fully accommodate all programs.
The District also lacks multi-purpose recreation spaces to accommodate

a variety of classes and programs. The Arena Banquet Room is not ideally
designed or equipped for recreation programs. The aquatic centre with the
fitness room is oriented towards fitness activities without programmable
spaces to meet the varied, diverse recreational needs of the community.
Ideally a community centre should be at the core of the community

with amenities for everyone and a focus on family-based recreation. The
current design approach for community centers is a “one stop” stand-alone
destination complex, complete with pool, arena ice, gymnasium and multi-
purpose recreation rooms supported by a centralized administration centre
for greater efficiency. Some cities even include libraries, museums, art and
cultural centres.
The community survey highlighted notable support for improvements to

indoor facilities (Table 23) including:
• Expand/ update Aquatic Centre (family changing rooms, stop using

chlorine, hours of operation, etc. 18%);
• Expand/ update arena (new rink surface, another rink, concession

services, etc. 10%);
• More age specific programs/ activities (9%);
• Gym/ work out facilities (7%), and
• Indoor courts (tennis, basketball, etc. 6%).
Summary Discussion on the future of the Community Centre
The District of Summerland is approaching a critical decision point in the

future of the aquatic and fitness centre. The facility has limited service
life remaining. Further, the facility is currently not meeting the social and
recreational needs of the present community and provisions must also be
made for increased future population.
93
TABLE 23: INDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES/ PROGRAMS THAT ARE LACKING OR

IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENT
Phone Online
(200) (268)
% %
Expand/ update Aquatic Centre (family changing rooms, stop using

18 37
chlorine, hours of operation, etc.)
Expand/ update arena (new rink surface, another rink, concession
10 11
services, etc.)
More age specific programs/ activities 9 14
Gym/ work out facilities 7 15
Courts (tennis, basketball, etc.) 6 10
Arts theatre 4 1
Fitness programs (yoga, gymnastics, etc.) 3 13
More programs/ activities in general 3 -
Indoor walking track 2 3
Bowling alley 1 -
Movie theatre 1 -
Miscellaneous 1 <1
None 58 35
Historically, the residents of Summerland have been very fortunate to have

had a pool. Few communities in BC with populations less than 10,000 have
indoor pools. The community has enjoyed the benefits of the indoor pool
for over 40 years and it has now become engrained as part of the fabric of
the community. Replacement in one form or another will need to be a major
focus of the community in the very near future.
There was very high public support expressed during engagement for this
Master Plan for construction of a new pool/community centre. The aquatic
centre is the highest used recreation facility within the district with over 50-
80,000 visits per year. It is the principle centre for community health and
94
wellness programs and an important social gathering space for residents.
The pool is also the venue for the Recope program, a unique and specialized
medical rehabilitative program found only in Summerland and providing
over 700 client visits per month. The facility is central to supporting major
community events in town such as Action Fest, and could play a stronger
role in economic contributions through swim meets. In short, there are
substantial health, social and economic benefits of replacing the aquatic
centre.
The future facility needs to be developed in conjunction with community

user groups. Possible preliminary design details for the new community
centre could include:
• Likely up to 75,000 square foot facility
• Minimum 6 lane/ 25 meter main pool
• Family leisure pool features such as lazy river, play elements
• Hot tub, sauna
• Universal/family changerooms
• Spectator viewing
• 3 Multi-purpose recreation rooms
• 2- 3 community meeting rooms
• Child-minding room
• 2,500 square foot weight and cardio room
• 1,500 square foot Dance/ yoga studio
There are two options for meeting the long term indoor recreation facility
needs:
1. Replace the pool with modern aquatic facilities and add additional
multipurpose rooms, or
2. As above, and add a full sized gymnasium.
95
Open House participant comments:
“The aquatic centre is dilapidated and in desperate need of replacement. We almost didn't
move to Summerland because of the recreation facility being 'dungy'. I would strongly
encourage this rec facility be a priority over the others mentioned above. This is a prime
access point for residents at all times of the year.”
“The pool and attached fitness facility are an important aspect of the community for all
ages/residents and should be considered as a first priority for resources.”
“Without immediate intervention, Summerland risks losing this well-used and loved, yet old
and tired facility.”
The ideal facility would be a complete community centre - a one stop

destination complex that offers something for everyone in the community.
Larger complexes have become the standard in communities and have
proven to increase overall community activity especially for families that can
access multiple programs and facilities in one visit to meet differing needs.
However, the difference between the two options is only partially one
of cost – both capital and ongoing operating expenses. The community
has a history of working together to provide supplemental recreational
facilities, particularly small gyms and multi-use spaces, such as the tennis
and badminton clubs, churches and school gyms. Continuing this trend of
supporting and encouraging the community to be participants in delivering
recreation services has significant benefits; it encourages volunteerism,
promotes a diversity of programs and can encourage greater skill
development in sports. A great opportunity may exist to partner with the
School District on the potential development of a new gym at the secondary
school, which could help meet the needs of the community and supplement
community facilities.
Community Centre Location
A search must begin for a site for a new community centre/pool as it cannot
be built on the existing site due to lack of space. Redevelopment within the
downtown core would contribute to the areas vibrancy. The downtown area
is centralized, close to the middle and secondary schools and related civic
facilities such as the library and art centre and reflects the historic patterns
of residents. An ideal location, space permitting, would be adjacent to the
96
ice arena. Several benefits of this location include:
• Centralized administration and greater civic presence at the arena;
• Potential for energy efficiency such as heat exchange systems;
• A one stop destination would increase patron use.
Process toward implementing a new community centre:
• Complete a detailed Needs Assessment and develop a program of

recreational activities and facility requirements;
• Identify possible location options and identify land acquisition

requirements;
• Develop a preliminary design plan with capital and operating cost

estimates;
• Develop a financial strategy and prepare for grant opportunities;
• Undertake community information and consultation, and
• Prepare detailed plans and construction contracts.
Developing the appropriate designs, securing the land, ensuring adequate

public consolation, establishing the financing and ultimately constructing
the facility could easily take 3-5 years or longer.
KEY FINDINGS
• A comparative analysis indicates that Summerland’s provision

of indoor recreation facilities is on par with similar sized BC
communities.
• Summerland directly operates two core recreation amenities and

works with community groups to operate more specialized recreation
facilities. However, these specialized facilities are not under District
control and are in disjunct locations; without strong operational links,
community recreation demands are not being fully met.
• Indoor recreation facilities in nearby neighbouring cities help meet

community demand.
97
• Lack of a District-operated gymnasium and multi-purpose rooms are

noted as hampering delivery of recreation programs.
• The community survey highlights that a significant number of

residents feel that there is a lack of indoor recreational facilities
and programs which is resulting in residents using facilities in other
communities.
• There is notable public support for improvements to indoor facilities.
• With the exception of the school facilities and the Baptist Church, all
indoor recreation facilities are aging and currently operating near full
capacity.
RECOMMENDATIONS
6-18 Continue to work closely with and support the non-profit societies
operating the indoor facilities to expand programming and help
ensure facilities meet community needs.
6-19 Continue to liaise cooperatively with the school district during any
future facility expansion, especially regarding the opportunity to
include expanded community use of the secondary school gym if
redeveloped.
6-20 Continue to explore opportunities to utilize existing facilities

for recreation programs such as the Odd fellows/Rebekah Hall,
Summerland Drop-In Recreation Centre Association and the UNISUS
International School.
6-21 Explore the possibility of converting the arena concourse into a

multi-purpose recreation room.
6-22 During any future plans to redevelop the aquatic centre, consider
adding a gymnasium in order to develop a comprehensive
community recreation centre.
98
7
Recreation
Programming
This section provides a summary of the recreation programs, festivals and special events available to
the residents of Summerland, firstly in a broad overview, followed by a more in-depth assessment
by age group and type of programming. Analysis is based upon community input and the District’s
capacity. Current trends in recreation programming are provided to guide the recommendations and
long term planning. Future direction for events and sport tourism is discussed.
7.1 EXISTING PROGRAMMING SUMMARY

Recreation programs serving Summerland residents and visitors are currently a blend of municipal and
partner delivered options. The District provides approximately 30 different programs annually, primarily
focused on sport and fitness programs for children and seniors. The great majority of programs occur
within the Aquatic and Fitness Centre and the Arena Complex. A few District-run programs are offered
at the Summerland Drop In Recreation Centre and the District will be offering programs in future at
Odd Fellows/Rebekah Hall and Summerland Dance Studio.
A substantial number of recreation programs are offered through a mix of private operators and many
community organizations such as the Summerland Boys and Girls Club, United and Baptist churches,
swim club, curling club, figure skating club, tennis club and badminton club, to name a few. Seniors
programs are offered by the Summerland Drop In Recreation Centre.
Large community events such as Action Fest, Christmas Light Up, farmer’s markets, rodeo, car shows,
dog show, bluegrass festivals and Wednesday music events are hosted by community partners. Smaller
family events, such as Halloween Haunt, Santa Skate, Earth Day and school Pro-D days are hosted by
99
the Recreation Department.
Summerland’s 2016 Cultural Plan provides five strategic directions

for the growth and development of highly valued arts and culture
programs in the community. Arts and cultural programs are offered by
the Summerland Arts Centre, the Summerland Museum and Heritage
Society, the library, and community arts and culture organizations.
The Centre Stage Theatre, co-operated with the School District, is an
important venue for concerts, live theatre, movies and drama classes.
7.1.1 AQUATICS
The Aquatic Centre is in many ways the centre of the community. It

supports a full range of swim lessons, leisure swimming opportunities,
medical rehab program, fitness classes, a very successful advanced swim
program plus special community events. Swim lessons complement
the lifestyle and ensure the safety of residents living near a lake. The
community survey shows high satisfaction with the pool but, at the same
time, there is also a strong community desire to see the pool facility
upgraded to a modern recreation complex complete with multi-purpose
rooms and gymnasium.
7.1.2 ARENA AND CURLING CLUB
The arena complex supports a full range of ice-related programs and

community events. The public survey shows high levels of satisfaction
with the arena, but also a desire for a second sheet of ice and an outdoor
skating surface. There may be opportunities to expand dry floor activities
in the arena and curling rink. The adjoining banquet room serves as
an adjunct multi-purpose recreation room for preschool and fitness
programs.
7.1.3 OUTDOOR SPORTS AND GENERAL RECREATION

PROGRAMMING
While the District provides limited outdoor sport and general recreation
programming directly, through partnerships, residents are provided
with a broad range of sport activities. However, residents go to other
communities for specialized courses (e.g., photography, dance), hobbies,
advanced skill development and personal growth/ lifestyle programs.
Residents express an interest in expanded recreation programs and
an indoor gym for winter programs for tennis, pickleball, volleyball,
basketball and indoor walking.
100
7.1.4 CAPACITY FOR PROGRAMMING
While there is a strong community desire to increase recreation

programming, there are a number of barriers to overcome:
• The District has only two main indoor recreation facilities and these
are used to near capacity.
• District-owned multipurpose rooms are limited and undersized for

many recreation programs.
• There are other venues and clubs (e.g., Lakeshore Racquets

Club, Badminton Club, Youth Centre) but these are largely run by
volunteers with limited capacity.
• Program development and community engagement are time-

intensive processes and staff capacity to drive new initiatives may be
limited.
• In a small community, achieving a critical volume of participants to fill

programs and finding skilled leaders/instructors is a challenge.
7.1.5 KEY FINDINGS
• The community engagement process indicates a desire for more

aquatic and recreation programs for various age groups, especially
families and children, as well as expanded operating hours for fitness
classes. This will be a challenge for staff based on current budget
allocations, staffing levels, and limited indoor facilities.
• Recreation programming is being delivered by a combination of

direct delivery and by non- profit associations and clubs. With limited
staff capacity, growth in service will depend on partnerships and
community engagement.
• This “Community Development Model”, in which the District does

not directly provide all recreation services but rather supports the
community to become a partner in meeting community needs, will
require the District to adopt more of a facilitator role, working with
associations to directly encourage and promote more programming.
• The demand for increased programming in limited facilities operating

at capacity particularly in peak times highlights a need for a review of
the allocation policies and fees and charges bylaw.
101
• The need to reach the demographics that are not users of the
programs or facilities, as well as optimizing participation of existing
patrons, could be addressed through a Marketing Plan and Strategy.
HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE TELEPHONE SURVEY
The top five recreational activities for adults are:

• Walking for exercise 57%
• Theatre/ music/ live performances 32%
• Bicycle (outdoor) 29%
• Swimming/ going to the beach 29%
• Water sports-other (kayaking, canoeing, fishing) 29%
The top five recreational activities for children are:

• Swimming (indoor) 63%
• Swimming/ going to the beach 56%
• Hockey/ ice skating/ curling 48%
• Water sports – other (kayaking, canoeing, fishing, etc.)
39%
• Walking for exercise 26%
The main barriers to participation are:

• Lack of Time 46%
• Physical limitations 26%
• Cost 15%
• Lack of facilities/ amenities 12%
• Lack of programs/services 11%
Reasons for using other facilities outside Summerland:

• Better facilities (i.e. more options, bigger) 50%
• Variety of programs/ actives available 39%
• Atmosphere (type of clientele, facility amenities) 25%
• Hours of operation/ schedules 21%
• No facilities/ services available locally 17%
Suggestions for improved programming include:

• Age-specific programming 9%
• Fitness programs 9%
• General recreation programs 9%
102
7.2 ANALYSIS AND TRENDS
7.2.1 CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
The Summerland Recreation Department directly offers approximately

six different programs annually for preschoolers and children, primarily
in play and aquatic programs. This is in addition to annual special events.
Other organizations such as the Youth Centre and the Baptist Church also
provide programs. As a small community with relatively few children,
Summerland is challenged to secure sufficient numbers of children in
appropriate age groupings.
Children and families are best served by a variety of recreation programs

including physical literacy skills, arts expression, science and learning,
and play and exploration. Physical literacy is important for children and
youth. Opportunities to experience team sport, individual sport and
active lifestyle provides confidence to continue activity throughout life
increasing health, social connections and quality of life.
The Society for Children and Youth of BC (SCY) is a unique provincial organization dedicated to
improving the well-being of children and youth. Since 1974, the Society has focused on providing a
strong voice representing children and youth in British Columbia. They provide support to improve
the well-being of children and youth in British Columbia.
http://www.childfriendlycommunities.ca/
Trends include:
• Parent/caregiver and child (or grandparent and child) programs

build healthy family bonds.
• Programs combining several activities with active and passive

experiences.
• Less structured and unstructured play time are positive for child
development.
• Concurrent child and adult programs.
• Summer camps during school holidays.
• Low cost family programs and financial subsidy provide equal

access.
103
KEY FINDINGS
• Swimming, going to the beach, ice sports and walking /biking/

hiking combined are the most common activities for families with
children.
• There are very limited recreation programs in Summerland for

children and young families.
• The community engagement process indicated a desire for both

more programs and expanded indoor facilities, including the pool
and arena.
• The Recreation Department can play a stronger facilitating role

for families by supporting community partners in offering a broad
range of programs and services.
• Public input reflects a desire for a safe, family-friendly

community.
7.2.2 YOUTH
Summerland Recreation Department directly offers only very limited

programs for teens, particularly swimming, skating and some special
events. Summerland Asset Development Initiative Youth Club (SADI)
and the Harold Simpson Youth Centre do provide space for youth
programming including Boys and Girls Club, Cadets, Scouts and Guides,
as well as summer programs. The community reported high levels of
satisfaction with these two facilities.
Although pre-teen and early teen programs are attended, particularly

aquatic programs, youth attending the middle school workshop
indicated a desire for more programs and activities for their age group.
Suggestions include:
• Enhance/ upgrade the existing indoor facilities by making them

more colorful, bright and fun and add more amenities like a wave
pool, lazy river;
• Indoor gymnasium for gymnastics, volleyball and basketball;
• Outdoor skating rink;
104
• Entertainment facilities like a theme park, movie theatre and arcade;
• Safe, comfortable outdoor gathering spaces, and
• Youth highlighted that they do not use the existing skatepark and
desire that the plans for the new facility proceed.
Older teens, 14-18 year-olds, have limited traditional recreation options

and do not attend the community programs or the youth centre. Providing
community services for youth, particularly those over 14 years old, who
are not strongly engaged in sport, music, youth groups or employment, is
a challenge for all communities. This age group has moved past the pool
and arena and now wants less structure and more opportunities to meet
and socialize on their own. Common youth meeting places like restaurants,
coffee shops, theatres, shopping centres and outdoor social spaces are
lacking in Summerland for this group so they look for opportunities to travel
outside the community. Many in the youth workshop reported a desire for
more youth-related entertainment opportunities such as movie theatre,
festivals, carnivals, concerts and movies in the park. Secondary students in
this workshop reported a sense of disconnect from the community.
UNICEF promotes the concept of a child and youth friendly city as means of supporting children’s
rights as enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Cities across the globe have
responded by developing child and youth friendly city policies, plans and strategies. For a good
example see: http://www.surrey.ca/files/Child_and_Youth_Friendly_City_Strategy_City_of_
Surrey.pdf
Trends include:
• Youth are not attracted to traditional programs prepackaged for them

unless they serve a purpose such as certification or job acquisition,
or are skill based around their passion (e.g., competitive sport).
• Youth value a strong social environment offering a variety of

opportunities where they can express themselves.
• Youth like to be involved in decisions that affect them and to have a

voice in the process.
105
• Youth are interested in local and global issues and are capable of
making a remarkable difference when given the opportunity and
supported.
• A Youth Friendly Community provides supportive places for

youth to express themselves, to be active in community life, be
involved in determining their opportunities and to celebrate youth
accomplishments.
KEY FINDINGS
• Young teens use recreational facilities to a limited extent.
• Older teens rarely use the District’s recreation facilities or programs.
• Youth recreation opportunities are minimal and youth expressed a

desire for more options of things to do during the year.
• They all desire expanded activities and opportunities for socializing.
• Both age categories together seek more festivals, events, and

concerts.
7.2.3 ADULTS
The Recreation Department directly offers a very limited range of adult

programs, largely geared toward health and fitness programs, as well
as weight room service. More specialized recreational activities are met
through participation in community associations such as pickleball, tennis,
badminton, golf, ice sports and field sports. The community survey reflected
a desire for more facilities and programs. A notable number of adults are
travelling outside the community for recreational opportunities. In addition,
Summerland residents reported high participation rates in Arts and Culture
programs.
Trends include:
• Adults with busy schedules, work and family commitments are a

difficult market to serve.
• Successful activities are flexible, often a shorter term commitment or

a short-term trial program followed by a longer session for those who
are committed.
106
• Flexibility is essential yet a strong commitment is often made to
team activities, indicating the strength and importance of social
connection.
• Drop-in activities and broad facility hours support shift workers and
busy, changing schedules.
• Good leadership that is expert in the activity yet understands the

importance of social belonging as well as skill acquisitions is essential.
• High quality facilities (including trails) are expected.
• There is an appetite for more sport opportunities.
KEY FINDINGS
• Walking, going to the theatre, biking, going to the beach and

watersports are the most common recreational activities for adults.
• Lack of time and physical limitations are the prime reasons for not
participating in recreation, followed by lack of facilities.
• Residents are going outside the community for recreational activities.
• There is a strong desire for improved indoor facilities and increased

programs.
7.2.4 SENIORS
With 31% of the population over age 65 and forecasted to increase, this is
an important segment of Summerland’s population. The Summerland Drop
In Recreation Centre provides most of the programming for its members.
The District provides fitness classes at the centre, as well as aquatic classes
in the pool.
Trends include:
• More active and more physically able than past generations.
• Interested in outdoor activity and protecting natural areas.
• Seeking learning experiences, often in interests they may have put off
while raising their families.
107
• Interested in programs serving social consciousness, professionally

led learning programs, shorter programs and workshops, and
exploring home based businesses.
• They are often self-directed, wanting “high quality” experiences and

wanting to contribute, influence and be heard. They are skilled and
able and not looking for segregated programs.
• Health and wellness is very important and allows them to participate

in a dynamic and full life.
• Programs supporting this demographic will include social programs,

outreach, rehabilitation and keeping well, trips and outings, dining
together, special services.
• Seniors are interested in health and maintaining independence.
KEY FINDINGS
• Seniors aquatic and rehab programs are very well attended.
• There is an opportunity for more partnership activities with the

Summerland Drop In Recreation Centre.
There are many resources to assist in planning for seniors:
The Age-friendly Communities grant program is intended to assist local governments in BC to best
support aging populations, develop and implement policies and plans, and/or develop projects
that enable seniors to age in place and facilitate the creation of age-friendly communities. http://
www.ubcm.ca/EN/main/funding/lgps.html
COSCO-Council of Senior Citizens Organizations http://www.coscobc.org/
World Health Organization (WHO) checklist of essential features of age friendly cities.http://www.
who.int/ageing/publications/Age_friendly_cities_checklist.pdf
108
7.3 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION
PROGRAMMING
The pocket desert ecosystem around Summerland is unique in Canada and

offers an amazing learning ground for public awareness about ecological
issues, the results of human impact and what citizens can do to positively
influence the environment. The diversity of unique species is astounding as
is the number of Species at Risk in this fragile environment (see Appendix
F). Preserving this biodiversity is of regional importance that begins with
awareness and education. Parks and trails, the lake and watershed and the
surrounding desert are important environmental features and amenities to
residents and visitors.
Current municipal-wide environmental events focus on composting,

recycling, sustainable water and energy conservation and an Earth Day event.
Although the District of Summerland does not offer ecotourism or nature
interpretation and appreciation programs, many local and regionally located
agencies do. There are notable naturalist-oriented clubs and educators and
outdoor learning landscapes in close proximity.
Growing research suggests that recreation in and contact with nature is

important for mental wellness and contentment, improved sleep, increased
engagement and revitalization.
7.4 TOURISM
Tourism is an important economic activity in Summerland and offers great
potential to contribute further to the community. Tourism can contribute
significantly to the local economy and support development of facilities,
programs and events. In turn, these can attract corporate sponsorship,
donations and volunteer efforts. Summerland’s idyllic setting with its
climate, the lake, great natural areas, and agricultural, historic and cultural
features makes it an ideal location for summer family vacations. While these
visitors do not make extensive use of Summerland’s recreational amenities,
according to the Chamber of Commerce, such amenities factor significantly
in a family’s decision to relocate to the community.
109
The area is certainly growing in its appeal for sport tourism and already
supports marquee sport tourism events such as:
• GranFondo
• Ultraman Canada Competition
• Giant’s Head Grind
• Ride the Grind Longboard competition
• Test of Humanity bike race
• Orca Club Sprint Triathlon
• Action Festival with Giant’s Head run and Man of Steel Triathlon
• Festivals such as Light Up, Action Fest and arts and cultural events
also draw visitors to the community.
Trends include:
• Combining family holidays and sports camps is a growing trend- the

arena, lake, sport fields
• Mountain biking and hiking are growing in demand.
• Activity/sport festivals such as paddle fest, bike fest and Wanderlust

yoga festivals have been very successful elsewhere and have
potential in Summerland to serve the residents and visitors.
• Sports tournaments particularly pickleball, soccer, curling, hockey,

slo-pitch and softball are still in demand.
• Education, tours and awareness about the unique and sensitive

environment and the impact of leisure and lifestyle choices are
appealing to visitors.
110
Trending recreation events that could stimulate tourism
• Advanced sport development
• Yoga /Wellness Retreats
• Wellness and Leadership Retreats ( i.e. “Hollyhock, South Okanagan Style”)
• Sport events with activity, humour and discovery (example: Medoc Marathon in France)
• Geocaching
• Paddlefest
• Kids fishing derby
• Cultural Celebrations (i.e. Bollywood or Bhangra Festival)
• Series of Culture Days celebrating the diversity in the Summerland area
• Adventure race focusing on “Desert Survival” (i.e. Tough Mudder of the Desert)
• “Mothership Holidays” including live on board boat with multiple activities (i.e. like water
sport, photography, cultural experience, nature field trip)
• Lego Festival
KEY FINDINGS
• Tourism helps build amenities and supports events for the

community.
• There is a history of strong support from service groups for

festivals and events.
• With improved or additional facilities there is an opportunity to

expand sports tourism.
• Some residents and the Chamber express concern about a

decrease in the number of festivals and events over time.
• Some event organizers express concern about the decrease in

volunteers.
111
• With limited capacity, the role of the Recreation Department in

tourism-related activities needs to be defined.
• The Chamber of Commerce and some residents feel that a lack of

campgrounds and the quality of Peach Orchard Campground and the
lack of moderately priced accommodations negatively affect tourism.
7.5 RECOMMENDATIONS
SYSTEM WIDE
7-1 Continue to undertake ongoing evaluations of the District’s program

requirements, assess priorities and abilities to provide services and
determine who in the community is best suited to provide that
service.
7-2 Adopt a facilitator role in working with clubs/associations and other

partners to help meet the recreational needs of the residents.
7-3 Explore opportunities for programming with new partners such as

Okanagan College, the agriculture research station, Summerland
Ornamental Gardens, Summerland Trout Hatchery.
7-4 Host an annual recreation-focused Community Fair in conjunction

with all sports clubs, to help raise awareness of the programs
available.
7-5 Encourage clubs and associations to offer introductory “How To”

lessons to encourage new membership.
7-6 Experiment with “Try it for free” or “Bring a Friend” initiatives to

increase participation levels for various demographics.
7-7 Launch a Marketing and Promotion campaign to raise awareness of

the health and wellness benefits of leisure activities and awareness
of the local clubs, facilities and organizations.
7-8 Annually survey a selection of residents to track interest in new

programs.
7-9 Work with the community to establish outdoor adventure programs:

hiking, paddleboard, kayaking, rock climbing, equestrian, and nature
appreciation.
112
7-10 Review and update the Joint Use Agreement with the School
District to improve opportunities for programming the
gymnasiums.
7-11 Collaborate with the Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen,

Penticton Indian Band, Interior Health and neighbouring
communities to identify service gaps, overlaps and opportunities
to expand recreation services on a regional scale.
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
7-12 Increase family programming and provide more flexibility in

programs, especially unstructured/ drop-in programs.
7-13 Identify opportunities for concurrent programs for parents and

children of different ages.
7-14 Explore the potential for a child-minding facility near the aquatic
centre.
7-15 Explore with residents where more free/low cost programs are
most needed.
7-16 Review the ice allocation policy to expand family skating.
YOUTH
7-17 Undertake a youth visioning process including a broad range of

youth and youth serving agencies (police, school, coaches, boys
and girls clubs, health authority) to develop a Youth Engagement
Strategy and clearly define the role of the District in the delivery
of youth services.
7-18 Revise the Terms of Reference for the Parks and Recreation
Commission to include one youth representative.
7-19 Encourage all clubs and associations to host more introductory

programs for youth such as pickleball.
7-20 Assess the potential of social marketing to communicate with

youth.
ADULTS
7-21 Experiment with more flexible program times and drop-in

programs to overcome lack of time as a barrier to participation.
113
SENIORS
7-22 Work with the Summerland Drop In Recreation Centre and

related agencies to determine gaps in program services and
the best means to deliver programs, particularly for fitness,
wellness, health, independence.
7-23 Based on the above, expand programming for seniors.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMMING
7-24 Work in conjunction with local natural history clubs to offer

environmental awareness programs and host events that raise
environmental awareness.
7-25 Promote environmental awareness through District programs

and events.
7-26 Add interpretive signage in parks and trails.
TOURISM AND SPECIAL EVENTS
7-27 Given staff’s limited capacity, the Recreation Department should

continue to focus on core community programs, services and
special family events within their mandate.
7-28 Continue to work with the Chamber to identify opportunities

for tourism/ special events as part of Economic Development
Initiatives.
7-29 Work with Destination BC to help market parks and recreation

programs to the seasonal tourist.
7-30 Initiate an Events Policy to guide the coordination, planning,

and administration of events including, fees, venues, approval
process, contacts, volunteers, acceptable and unacceptable
events.
7-31 As part of the Events Policy, explore potential for corporate

donations, sponsorships and naming rights of facilities,
programs and events that support tourism.
114
8
Service
Delivery
8.1 FINANCIAL REVIEW

8.1.1 ANNUAL BUDGET
The District of Summerland spent $ 2,352,790 on parks and recreation in 2017, which is 17% of total
District operating expenditures in that year. After deducting Recreation Department revenues from
programs, fees, rentals, and other sources including the Peach Orchard Campground, the net cost for
parks and recreation was $1.54 million, or 11% of total District operating expenditures, in 2017. This
equates to $312.86 per household or $132.93 per person in 2017.
Table 24 shows District of Summerland actual Parks and Recreation expenditures and revenues in
2016 and 2017 and budgeted expenditure and revenues for 2018.
8.1.2 RECOVERY RATE
The recovery rate is both a broad measure of the philosophy of an organization in relation to its fee
policy, and a measure of the efficiency of its operations. Recovery rate is calculated by dividing a
Department’s total revenue generated by its the total annual operating cost.
Table 24 shows the recovery rate for Summerland’s expenditure on parks and recreation, which was
38% in 2016 and 34% in 2017. This is in the middle to high end of the range of rates seen by the
consultant team, which average between 23 – 40% for smaller communities. For Summerland, this
indicates a comparable level of public subsidy for parks and recreation services to other municipalities.
115
TABLE 24: EXPENDITURES ON PARKS AND RECREATION
2016 2017 (actual) 2018 (budget)
Parks and Recreation Expenditures $2,150,128 $2,352,790 $2,371,838

Recreation Department Revenues $812,110 $808,845 $804,300
Net cost $1,338,018 $1,543,945 $1,567,538
Cost per person $115.20 $132.93 $134.96
Cost per household $271.13 $312.86 $317.64
Recovery rate 38% 34% 34%
8.1.3 FEES AND CHARGES BYLAW 98-001
Municipalities set fees and charges for the services they provide to the
community. Rates are partially determined by actual operating costs,
including overhead, administration, facility operation and depreciation.
However, the fees and charges are also an expression of the community’s
philosophy towards the value of recreation services, recognizing that some
users, such as children, should receive a higher subsidy in order to ensure
that cost is not a limitation to participation in important programs and
facilities.
Periodically municipalities review their fees and charges. It is a very complex

exercise to determine the operating costs, set levels of subsidy and balance
between taxes and user fees. A benchmarking exercise to determine
comparable fees and charges in other communities is a common method
used by municipalities to guide the process. A regional market comparison
of three admission and rental rates was conducted to aid a basic analysis
(see Tables 25, 26 and 27).
The community’s willingness to pay and the method of payment, either

through direct taxation or user- pay are also important considerations. The
community survey indicated that cost was the third highest barrier (15% of
respondents) to participation in recreation, after lack of time and physical
limitations. Survey respondents also indicated a preference to pay for new
or expanded services through a combination of increase in taxes and user
fees as opposed to a single increase in either taxes or fees.
116
TABLE 25: COMPARISON OF RECREATIONAL SWIM ADMISSION RATES
($/PERSON)
W.
CATEGORY SUMMERLAND MERRITT PENTICTON VERNON KELOWNA AVERAGE
KELOWNA
pre-school 1.00 n/a 1.25 1.95 n/a 1.60 1.60
child 2.50 2.40 4.25 3.90 2.75 2.90 3.25
teen 3.25 3.00 5.25 4.50 3.65 4.50 4.18
adult 4.50 4.00 6.25 6.00 4.65 5.25 5.23
senior 3.75 3.00 5.25 4.15 3.70 3.75 3.97
family 9.50 n/a 16 12.35 10.30 11.40 12.51
TABLE 26: COMPARISON OF RECREATIONAL SKATING ADMISSION RATES

($/PERSON)
CATEGORY pre-school child teen adult senior family
Summerland - 2.50 3.25 4.50 3.75 9.50
Merritt 0.00 2.40 3.00 4.00 3.00 n/a
Penticton 1.50 2.50 3.50 4.50 3.50 11.00
Vernon n/a 1.65 4.30 5.70 4.05 13.65
W. Kelowna n/a 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 10.00
Kelowna 2.75 3.75 4.50 4.50 3.75 11.00
Oliver 0.00 2.35 2.35 3.10 2.60 10.30
Osoyoos 3.10 3.10 3.10 4.10 3.10 8.20
Average 1.84 2.75 3.46 4.20 3.36 10.69
117
TABLE 27: COMPARISON OF ARENA RENTAL RATES

($/HOUR)
CATEGORY YOUTH ADULT COMMERCIAL
Summerland 74 148 148
Merritt 75 105 n/a
Penticton 82.31 155.5 188.25
Vernon 120.54 185.45 n/a
W. Kelowna 83.87 167.75 193.54
Kelowna 85.97 171.95 171.95
Oliver 48.08 95.35 114.28
Osoyoos 51 95.5 77.5
Average 78.11 139.5 149.104
KEY FINDINGS
• Net expenditures on Parks and Recreation was 11% of total District

operating expenditures in 2017.
• In 2017, the net cost of Parks and Recreation was $312.86 per
household or $132.93 per person.
• Summerland’s recovery rate for spending on Parks, Recreation and

Community Services was 34% in 2017. This is comparable to other
smaller municipalities.
• Recreation programs and services are limited and not meeting

community expectations, particularly teens, seniors and young
families, due to existing staffing levels.
• Overall Summerland’s admission fees and arena rental rates are

lower that the regional average:
–– Pool admission rates are 25-35 percent lower;
–– Arena admission rates are on par, and
–– Arena rental rates are nearly 20-30 percent lower than
comparable communities.
118
• The subsidy levels for various age categories are consistent with the
comparable communities and current recreation trends.
• Cost of programs and services is an important consideration for

residents.
• There appears to be public support for a combination of an increase

in user fees and taxes for increased services.
RECOMMENDATIONS
8-1 Conduct a regional review of recreation fees and charges.
8-2 Explore with residents where more free/low cost programs are most
needed.
8-3 Explore more opportunities to increase revenues to offset the cost

of recreation programs and services.
8-4 Develop policy around commercial use in parks as potential source

of revenue.
8-5 Conduct an organizational review of the Recreation department to

analyze current staff levels and determine appropriate resources to
meet required program and service delivery demands.
8-6 Develop a Departmental Operational Plan for the Recreation

department to outline the roles and responsibilities, define the
Mission statement, purpose, core programs and services, expected
outcomes, and community benefits.
8.2 REVIEW OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

8.2.1 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION BYLAW 2000-057
A Parks and Recreation Commission is a vital link between the District and
its community. The Commission plays a key role in representing the voice
of the community which is vital in successfully achieving the District’s goals
and objectives for parks and recreation services.
The Parks and Recreation Commission bylaw clearly outlines the make-up,
duties, responsibilities and procedures of the Commission. The bylaw also
provides a valuable definition of the Philosophy, Purpose and Goals of the
119
Commission, which would be meaningful for the Recreation Department

itself to adopt.
KEY FINDINGS
• The designation of Commission is usually reserved for governing

bodies with greater autonomy and authority than expressed in
the current bylaw. Since the Commission has no direct budgeting
authority, a review of the title and terms of reference is warranted to
bring it in alignment with other committees of Council.
• Section 5 defines the make-up of the Commission. It is to consist

of 6 members at large representing interests in sports, culture and
matters of social interest. Acknowledging the unique and special
needs of seniors and youth would broaden the perspective.
• Section 8 defines the Philosophy, Purpose and Goals of the

Commission. Those responsibilities have not been fully exercised in
the past. The mandate includes the need to be continuously engaged
in an ongoing role to assist with implementation of the plan, to
monitor ongoing performance, to assist in setting annual priorities
and formally reporting progress to Council.
• Section 7(a) states that the Commission should hold regular meetings
at least two times per year. Meetings have not historically been held
regularly. There is much work to be done by the Commission in order
assist with the implementation of this Master Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS
8-7 Change the name and terms of reference from Parks and Recreation
Commission to Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee.
8-8 Revise Section 5 of the bylaw by expanding membership to include

a youth representative from Summerland Secondary School and a
senior’s representative from the Summerland Drop In Recreation
Centre.
8-9 Fully engage the Commission in a more proactive and regular

manner to assist with implementation of the Master Plan, to
monitor ongoing performance, to assist in annually setting priorities
and reporting progress to Council.
8-10 Revise section 7(a) to read: “The Commission shall hold regular
quarterly meetings with additional meetings as required.”
120
8.2.2 PARKS REGULATION BYLAW 95-013
This bylaw regulates the use of all public parks, beaches and municipal
property.
KEY FINDINGS
The bylaw is generally satisfactory to protect municipal property and the

public, except in the following areas:
• The authority for administering the bylaw is inconsistent as it varies

from Public Works Superintendent (3k), Public Works Department
(3m) and Director of Parks and Recreation (3p).
• The bylaw would apply to the Peach Orchard Campground and the
Rodeo Grounds as these are not specially excluded. This creates a
potential inconsistency as the bylaw states parks are closed from
11:00 PM to 6:00 AM.
• Bikes are not permitted to be ridden in any park (3l).
• Dogs are not permitted in any park, even if on leash, except the off-
leash park and seasonally in Peach Orchard Park. Regulations for off
leash sites are covered under Bylaw 2017-024, Part 7.
• Skateboarding is permitted in all parks and public places, with the

exception of skateboarding in Giants Head Park by permission (3p).
Frequently, municipal jurisdictions limit skateboarding to designated
areas to ensure public safety.
RECOMMENDATIONS
8-11 Amend the Parks Regulation Bylaw authority to be the Chief

Administrative Officer or designate.
8-12 Amend the Parks Regulation Bylaw to exclude the Peach Orchard
Campground and the Rodeo Grounds.
8-13 Amend section (3l) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw by deleting

reference to bicyclists therefore permitting cycling in all parks unless
specifically identified as not permitted.
8-14 Amend section (3d) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw to permit

horseback riding in Conkle Mountain Park.
121
8-15 Amend section (3d) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw for any
change in the location of off-leash parks.
8-16 Amend section (3p) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw to permit

skateboarding in designated areas only, or those areas where
permission to skateboard has been granted.
8.2.3 JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH SCHOOL DISTRICT 67
A joint use agreement is a mutually beneficial agreement between a

municipality and the local school district, to ensure the shared, equitable
use of both municipal and school facilities. Such agreements help to
maximize facility usage, maximize public benefits and help ensure
continued collaboration between jurisdictions. Agreements focus on
topics such as: scheduling use of facilities, cost sharing, fee schedule,
maintenance standards and booking responsibility. The Parks and
Recreation Commission is well-established to assist in the administration
of the agreement.
KEY FINDINGS
• There is a history of a good working relationship between the

District staff and School District 67.
• There is a 1983 joint use agreement for operation of the pool and
a 1987 agreement (bylaw 2128) for the community theatre, both
on School District property.
• There is no valid, current and reciprocal joint use agreement with

the School District.
• Survey respondents expressed a desire to gain better access to

School District facilities.
RECOMMENDATION
8-17 Develop a joint use agreement with School District 67 for shared
use of District and school facilities.
122
9
Implementation
Plan
This section provides a suggested implementation plan consisting of the recommendations made
throughout the Master Plan, with suggested timelines for implementation and estimated capital and
ongoing operational and maintenance funding requirements where significant. Recommendations
that are relatively high priorities are noted; the assessment of priority is based on parks and recreation
requirements as well as feedback from the community, staff, the Parks and Recreation Commission
and District Council.
This Master Plan is intended to provide guidance for District Council and staff over the next 10 years.
Actual implementation of the master plan’s recommendations will be determined by District Council
and staff as appropriate and will take into account resource availability and requirements, as well as
other District priorities.
This implementation plan does not represent a commitment to spend. Spending decisions are
ultimately made through the annual budget process and approved by District of Summerland Council.
While this implementation plan provides a guide, the District should remain flexible to meet changing
community needs as well as the opportunities and financial capabilities of the District over time.
9.1 FUNDING STRATEGIES

The capital and operating investment recommended in this Master Plan presents a challenge for
municipal financing, and will require a range of different strategies. The District of Summerland, like
other municipalities in BC, will have to use a combination of conventional and non-conventional
123
methods to address its parks and recreation renewal challenges and to

meet the needs of its population.
Many strategies will be dependent on partnerships and coordination

between different levels of government, as well as with community
organizations. Staff require dedicated time to build partnerships, develop
resources, establish volunteer committees, and to build new required
skills. Many of the funding avenues described here will require ongoing
attention to establishing and maintain productive partnerships.
9.1.1 ONGOING INVESTMENT GOALS
Most municipalities fail to adequately provide for asset renewal,

and the result of this shortfall is a progressive infrastructure deficit.
Ideally, a municipality should invest enough annually in its facility and
infrastructure assets to sustain them over the long term.
As a rough rule of thumb, for example, this would mean committing

about 2% of replacement value of buildings each year, given that
the expected life cycle of buildings is approximately 50 years. Actual
spending might be incremental, in the form of ongoing upgrades and
major maintenance projects, or it might be all at once, in the form of
end-of-life-cycle replacement.
Asset life cycles vary in length. Assets such as rinks and pools, where
moisture and chemicals inherent in their operation accelerate structural
and mechanical wear and tear, may have only a 35 year functional
lifespan. The calculation of required life cycle investment can be fine-
tuned on this basis. New facility development should always include
consideration of ongoing operating costs with those of the initial
capital outlay. When designing the facility, adding energy efficiencies,
multifunctional features, and considering future expansion or retrofit
options can achieve efficiencies that repay the original cost several
times over the life of the facility. Pools and rinks in particular have high
potential to deliver energy exchanges to heat/cool other components
in a facility.
In relationship to parkland and park amenities achieved through local

development the District should always be careful to only accept land
which is desirable for park purposes and amenities built to a high
standard to avoid an ongoing burden of maintenance responsibility with
little benefit to the community.
124
9.1.2 CORE FUNDING
Conventionally, the funds to create, sustain and renew park and recreation assets
are drawn from the local property tax base, either within annual budgets or, for
large ticket items, through capital plans. This core funding may be supplemented
by user fees. While user fees are rarely enough to offset capital costs, they can
cover a proportion of operating expenses; Summerland’s cost recovery rate is
about 34%, which is in the middle of the range for BC municipalities. The budget
for parks and recreation in Summerland in 2018 is $2.37 million, which is 6.6%
of total District budgeted expenditures in 2018. These expenditures are offset
by revenue of $804,000, resulting in net expenditures of $1.57 million.
Some external funding can be realized through such sources as senior

government infrastructure renewal and economic stimulus programs. Plans
should be developed in advance so that they are on hand when such funding
opportunities arise.
Summerland’s Development Cost Charges (DCC) Bylaw (2000-194) includes

development charges for Park Land Acquisition and for Park Improvement.
Summerland has a Parks Dedication Reserve with $824,833 in 2017 as well as
a Recreation, Parks and Trails Enhancement Reserve Account, with $167,021
in 2017. In the 2018 budget, 118,178 from the Recreation, Parks and Trails
Enhancement Reserve Account is allocated for Parks capital projects and another
$41,300 for operating, resulting in a balance of $7,543 in this account in 2018.
9.1.3 GRANTS
The District should continue to monitor for grant opportunities to assist with the
development of parks, trails and recreation facilities and amenities. Additionally,
maintaining contact with local MLAs and MPs helps raise awareness and
communicate the needs in the community. Health authorities are becoming
increasingly instrumental in acquiring new grants for parks and recreation as
stronger correlations are being made between active and healthy living.
District staff should have sufficient time and resources to monitor grant
opportunities and develop applications. One valuable source of grants
information is the CivicInfo BC website (https://www.civicinfo.bc.ca/grants).
In addition to seeking grant funding on its own, the District should consider
partnership grant applications with another government agency or a non-profit
group as well as supporting and encouraging community members/groups,
which may be eligible for grants not available to municipal governments.
125
9.2 MONITORING AND EVALUATION

It is recommended that the Parks and Recreation Commission, in
collaboration with the Recreation Manager, annually review progress
in implementing the recommendations of this Master Plan.
The annual progress review should also include review of the

recommendations that have not yet been implemented, to evaluate
whether they continue to capture the needs and aspirations of the
community and, where they do not, revise them accordingly.
9.3 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TABLE

The table on the following pages contains all of the recommendations in
this Master Plan, with recommended timelines for their implementation
and estimated associated cost. Cost estimates are class D cost estimates
done without the benefit of detailed designs and are provided for long
range budget purposes. Actual costs will vary depending on the design/
scope of work and what is contracted out vs. done in house. Additionally,
costs may increase over time, so that costs several years in the future
may be significantly higher.
Some of the recommendations in the table have been identified as high

priorities. This determination was made based on input and feedback
from the community and District staff as well as the consultants’
assessment. Recommendations are determined to be high priorities if:
• They have been identified as high priorities by the community

and/or District staff;
• There are significant implications for the quality or longevity of

District assets, including parks, trails and built infrastructure =
essential to protect civic infrastructure;
• They reduce maintenance costs;
• They protect public health or safety;
• They leverage potential grants or partnerships; and/or
• There is a potential to increase revenues.
126
TABLE 28: IMPLEMENTATION TABLE
HIGH ESTIMATED
No. RECOMMENDATIONS TIMEFRAME
PRIORITY COST
Climate Change
Explore opportunities for using the District’s green revolving

fund to finance further investments in energy efficiency and
3-1 Life of PRMP Staff time
GHG emission reductions in District recreation facilities and
parks.
Ensure that remediated or new lakeshore parks and trail
areas take into account projected future flooding under
3-2 climate change and reflect best practices for construction x 1-3 years Staff time
in riparian areas as well as protection and enhancement of
riparian ecosystems.
Ensure that parks and recreation infrastructure is
3-3 incorporated into asset management, including recognition 1-3 years Staff time
of its environmental and social benefits.
Continue to improve pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, Allocate a
3-4 including creation of additional multi-use trails that are Life of PRMP portion of the
connected to existing trail networks. annual budget
$1,500 per
waste bin
Consider placing combined recycling/waste bins in parks, at
3-5 1-3 years + cost of
trailheads, and outside of the arena and aquatic centre.
collection
services
Ensure any new District buildings are at least 25% more Design/
3-6 energy efficient than what would be required under the BC Life of PRMP building
Building Code. dependent
Allocate a
Consider planting more trees along streets and parking lots
3-7 Life of PRMP portion of the
and in parks, in the context of an Urban Forest Strategy.
annual budget
Explore the potential to claim Avoided Forest Conversion
3-8 credits for forested land that was dedicated as new park land 3-7 years Staff time
after September, 2007.
127
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Park System
4-1 Adopt the recommended parks classification scheme. Staff time

Adopt recommended park supply standards:
4-2 • 0.5 ha/1,000 residents for neighbourhood parks, and 1-3 years Staff time
• 2.2 ha/1,000 residents for community and city parks
Ensure that new developments include adequate parks and
open space to meet the needs of new residents:
4-3 • All residents within a 5-10 minute walk of a park, and 1-3 years Staff time
• At least 2.7 hectares of developed parkland for every
1,000 new residents
Develop a Parkland Acquisition and Improvement Program
that targets the recommended park supply standards
4-4 and identifies priorities and requirements for Parkland 3-7 years Staff time
Acquisition and Improvements. Update the DCC Bylaw to
reflect the Parkland Acquisition and Improvement Program.
Acquire and develop neighbourhood parks, particularly in
Dependent on
4-5 norther Trout Creek, Happy Valley and the Sinclair- Barclay 7+ years
land value
neighbourhood west of Downtown.
Staff time
Develop a parks natural features/areas management or $40,000
4-6 x 1-3 years
strategy. for external
consultant
Prepare a comprehensive inventory of District parkland
including parcel sizes, designation in OCP, zoning, whether
4-7 dedicated or not, history and intended uses. Ensure that 1-3 years Staff time
both existing and new parks are properly dedicated and
documented as they are added to the inventory.
128
HIGH
No. RECOMMENDATIONS TIMEFRAME ESTIMATED COST
PRIORITY
Summerland's Parks
Use flood remediation in lakeshore parks as opportunity to

4-8 improve amenities and accessibility as well as resilience to x 1-3 years Staff time
future flood events.
Design dependent
Upgrade washrooms in Gordon Beggs Rotary Beach Park and
4-9 x 1-3 years New: $50-
Peach Orchard Campground.
250,000
Design dependent
Explore the cost & feasibility of upgrading and winterizing
4-10 x 1-3 years New: $50-
washrooms at Peach Orchard Beach Park and Memorial Park.
250,000
4-11 Undertake park master plan/visioning for Memorial Park. 1-3 years $50,000
4-12 Repair roof and enclose stage of bandshell in Memorial Park. x 1-3 years $250,000
Add more play equipment such as a slide and sun shelter
4-13 (pergola) to the picnic area along the walkway in Gordon Beggs 3-7 years $50,000
Rotary Beach Park.
Investigate the feasibility of making Dog Beach accessible to Feasibility and
4-14 x 1-3 years
people with mobility challenges. design dependent
Explore opportunities to expand boat launch parking lot
4-15 3-7 years Staff time
adjacent to Peach Orchard Beach Park.
$5,000 for
Explore a long distance designated swim lane from Peach buoys & signage
4-16 1-3 years
Orchard Park to Rotary Beach. + annual
maintenance
4-17 Undertake conceptual planning for Peach Orchard Beach Park. 3-7 years $50,000
4-18 Undertake improvements to Powell Beach Park. 1-3 years $100,000
Pave Dale Meadows Park parking lot using a permeable surface
4-19 3-7 years $250,000
or other eco-friendly solution.
Consider building a change room/clubhouse facility at Dale
4-20 7+ years $300,000
Meadows in partnership with sports clubs.
To improve turf management on sports fields, purchase a reel
4-21 mower once the parking lot at Dale Meadows Park has been 3-7 years $20-40,000
resurfaced.
4-22 Resurface perimeter track at Dale Meadows Park. 1-3 years $50,000
129
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Summerland's Parks
Improve communication and coordination with user groups,

4-23 including hosting an annual meeting each spring with District Life of PRMP Staff time
staff and sports field user group representatives.
Explore whether Deer Ridge Park can or should be transformed
4-24 TBD Staff time
Explore whether Dunham Park can or should be transformed
4-25 TBD Staff time
4-26 Undertake master planning for Conkle Mountain Park. 3-7 years $50,000
Prohibit recreation access to Woodbridge Nature Preserve,
except at the property perimeter.
Explore possibilities for community off-season use of Peach
Orchard Campground.
Undertake a park master plan for the Rodeo Grounds,
exploring community needs and possible uses for the site,
4-29 3-7 years $50,000
servicing requirements and costs, and possible operating
arrangements.
Implement the recommendations of the Downtown Strategic $50,000
4-30 Plan to create a central gathering place in the Downtown core x 3-7 years planning plus
and enhance public open space. capital costs
Explore other opportunities for permanent or temporary
public plazas/gathering spaces in the downtown area, in
collaboration with Chamber of Commerce, School District, and
churches.
Design
4-32 Enhance the public gathering space in Memorial Park. 3-7 years
dependent
When building new buildings/washrooms/facilities or
Staff time /
undertaking major renovations, consider opportunities to
4-33 Life of PRMP opportunity
increase energy efficiency, install solar panels, and rainwater
dependent
collection.
Assess the accessibility of all District of Summerland-owned
4-34 1-3 years $30,000
outdoor public washrooms.
130
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Playgrounds
$60,000 each
for Memorial
and Peach
Replace the playgrounds in Memorial Park, Peach Orchard
4-35 x 1-3 years Orchard Beach;
Beach Park and Peach Orchard Campground as planned.
$30,000 for
Peach Orchard
Campground
$50-100,000
4-36 Replace playgrounds in other parks as needed. Life of PRMP
each
Create new playgrounds, including natural playgrounds, in Staff time
areas that are not currently within 10-minutes of walk of a (planning)
4-37 7+ years
playground (western and southern parts of Lower Town, the and $50,000-
western part of Trout Creek and Happy Valley). 100,000 each
Additional sports fields are not needed currently, but the

4-38 District should monitor over time to determine whether Life of PRMP Staff time
community needs are continuing to be met with existing fields.
Staff time;
Assess the Powell Beach tennis courts and undertake any Renovation
4-39 x 1-3 years
needed repairs. cost $50-
80,000
Staff time;
total court
Work with the School District to rehabilitate the tennis courts
4-40 3-7 years rehabilitation
at Summerland Secondary School.
costs $50-
80,000 per
Convert the 2 dedicated pickleball courts at Peach Orchard
4-41 x 1-3 years $15,000
Campground to 4 courts.
Once the tennis courts at the Summerland Secondary School
have been rehabilitated, convert the shared tennis-pickleball
4-42 3-7 years $20,000
court at Peach Orchard Campground to dedicated pickleball
courts.
Explore possibilities for a long-term dedicated site for outdoor
4-43 pickleball that would permit expansion over time as the 3-7 years Staff time
number of pickleball players grows..
131
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Places for Dogs
Identify and explore options for one or more full-time, year-

4-44 x 1-3 years Staff time
round off-leash dog parks.
Apply planning principles to identifying and planning spaces for
4-45 Life of PRMP Staff time
dogs.
Explore options for allowing dogs off-leash in designated areas
of parks during certain times of day or months of the year.
Possibilities might include Peach Orchard Campground, the
Rodeo Grounds and Powell Beach Park.
Explore the feasibility of making Dog Beach accessible to
Staff time;
people with mobility challenges. If the required construction
$30,000
4-47 is permissible in the riparian zone and the cost is reasonable x 1-3 years
(design
for the District to incur, the project should be included in the
dependent)
capital budget for the next 1-3 years.
$2,000
Provide garbage cans, dog waste bags and signage in parks and
4-48 3-7 years per waste
at trailheads where dogs are permitted.
receptacle
Revise the Dog Regulation And Impounding Bylaw (96-002)
to permit dogs on leash in all parks except on sports fields,
playgrounds, spray parks, skate parks, and beaches or at events
unless specifically permitted by the event organizer.
Staff time;
Pursue opportunities to acquire land adjacent to Okanagan
4-50 Life of PRMP land value
Lake to increase public access to the waterfront.
dependent
Continue to uphold the Lower Town Development Permit
Area guidelines that provide for public access to the shoreline
4-51 x Life of PRMP Staff time
and for increased commercial or public opportunities for
recreational activities along the shoreline.
132
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Trees
4-52 Develop an urban forest strategy. 3-7 years $50-75,000

Staff time;
Plant trees along streets and in parks. Environmental grant additional
4-53 programs and the District’s Tree Fund Reserve account could Life of PRMP operating
be sources of funding. costs for tree
maintenance
Staff time
Undertake hazard tree assessments in District parks and along
or external
4-54 trails. Hazard tree assessments should be done in the context x Life of PRMP
consultant on a
of the Urban Forest Strategy, once it is available.
site-by-site basis
Maintenance
Dependent
4-55 Consider hiring additional landscaping staff. Life of PRMP on position/
contract
4-56 Purchase a top-dresser as budgeted for 2018. 1-3 years $20-40,000
Ensure there is regular communication between parks
4-57 maintenance staff and sports field users. Consider developing x Life of PRMP Staff time
guidelines on the responsibilities of field users.
4-58 Develop a list of priorities for donated infrastructure/projects. x 1-3 years Staff time
Develop standards for donated infrastructure/projects to
4-59 ensure they meet safety standards and the requirements of x 1-3 years Staff time
the District.
Staff time
Create an asset management plan for major park amenities or external
4-60 3-7 years
and infrastructure. consultant
$100,000
133
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Trails
Develop a Trails Master Plan to identify existing trails and

missing links within Summerland and in surrounding areas, to
plan a trail network that:
• Connects neighbourhoods, parks and open spaces, and
5-1 community amenities; x 1-3 years $75,000
• Provides active transportation and recreation
opportunities; and
• Avoids environmentally sensitive or hazard areas and does
not facilitate access to these areas.
Involve trails user groups, environmental groups, and other
5-2 stakeholders with an interest in trails in development of the x 1-3 years
Trails Master Plan.
The Trails Master Plan should identify mechanisms and
5-3 processes for collaboration between the District and x 1-3 years
organizations and groups with an interest in trails.
The Trails Master Plan should establish design standards
5-4 for various intended user groups as well as maintenance x 1-3 years
standards.
Following development of the Trails Master Plan, implement
signage to provide clarity on permitting uses on trails as well as Signage Plan:
5-5 x 3-7 years
wayfinding and promotion of trails (and parks). Signage should $30,000
have a consistent look and feel, with Summerland branding.
5-6 Develop a Cycling Network Plan. x 1-3 years $35,000
Collaborate with the South Okanagan Similkameen
Conservation Program (SOSCP), local naturalists and
environmental groups such as the Summerland Environmental
Science Group, and trail user groups and clubs to understand
and inventory ecological values in Summerland’s parks and
natural areas.
134
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Summerland Aquatic and Fitness Centre
Conduct a detailed facility audit of the entire Aquatic and

$30,000 -
6-1 Fitness Centre building, its structure and plant including x 1-3 years
$40,000
compliance with municipal and provincial code requirements.
6-2 Develop an asset lifecycle plan and adjust budgets accordingly. x 1-3 years $15,000
Develop a long term strategy for the eventual replacement
of the Aquatic and Fitness Centre with multipurpose rooms, $60,000 -
6-3 x 1-3 years
including plans, designs, confirm location, public support and $80,000
cost estimates.
$ 25- 35
Million; Annual
operating
6-4 Replace or upgrade the pool per the long-term strategy. 3-10 years
increase of
$200,000-
$300,000
TBD after
Implement a facility replacement reserve to support the design and
6-5 x 1-3 years
eventual replacement of the facility. estimates
completed
If the estimated life expectancy of the pool is greater than
6-6 10 years, add a UV system to reduce chlorination and 7+ years $20,000
maintenance costs.
Review the pool operating hours and explore opportunities to
increase use of the pool and increase revenue.
Summerland Arena and Curling Club
Conduct a detailed facility audit of the entire building, its

6-8 structure and plant including compliance with municipal and x 1-3 years $20,000
provincial code requirements.
Develop a facility maintenance management plan. Adjust $15,000 for the
6-9 x 1-3 years
budgets accordingly. study
Implement upgrades to the washrooms and changerooms and
6-10 partner with the Junior ”B” club to improve their washroom/ 3-7 years $40,000
changeroom facility.
Explore with the Junior ”B” club regarding improving their
washroom/changeroom facility.
135
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Summerland Arena and Curling Club, continued
6-12 Continue to upgrade the concession and concession services. 7+ years $20,000
Develop a long term strategy for the eventual replacement
$60,000 -
6-13 of the Arena Complex. Monitor community use levels of the 3-7 years
$80,000
curling rink over the long term.
6-14 Replace or upgrade the arena per the long-term strategy. 7+ years $15-20 million
Implement a facility replacement reserve to support the
6-15 3-7 years TBD
eventual replacement of the facility.
Conduct a needs assessment and cost analysis for a potential
second arena.
Explore options for increasing recreational opportunities such
6-17 as roller derby in both the arena and curling club during the 3-7 years Staff time
spring dry floor months.
Indoor Facility Supply
Continue to work closely with and support the non-

profit societies operating the indoor facilities to expand
programming and help ensure facilities meet community
needs
Continue to liaise cooperatively with the school district
during any future facility expansion, especially regarding
the opportunity to include expanded community use of the
secondary school gym if redeveloped.
Continue to explore opportunities to utilize existing facilities
for recreation programs such as the Odd fellows/Rebekah Hall,
Summerland Drop-In Recreation Centre Association and the
UNISUS International School.
Explore the possibility of converting the arena concourse into a $20,000 design
6-21 3-7 years
multi-purpose recreation room. study
$3.5- 5 million
capital; $20-
During any future plans to redevelop the aquatic centre,
30,000 annual
6-22 consider adding a gymnasium in order to develop a x 1-3 years
operating
comprehensive community recreation centre.
budget
increase
136
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Recreation Programming - System Wide
Continue to undertake ongoing evaluations of the District’s

Staff time
program requirements, assess priorities and abilities to provide
7-1 Ongoing for annual
services and determine who in the community is best suited to
evaluation
provide that service.
Adopt a facilitator role in working with clubs/associations and
7-2 other partners to help meet the recreational needs of the Ongoing Staff time
residents.
Explore opportunities for programming with new partners
7-3 such as Okanagan College, the agriculture research station, Ongoing Staff time
Summerland Ornamental garden, Summerland Trout Hatchery.
Host an annual recreation-focussed Community Fair in
7-4 conjunction with all sports clubs, to help raise awareness of Ongoing $5,000
the programs available.
Encourage clubs and associations to offer introductory “How
7-5 Ongoing Staff time
To” lessons to encourage new membership.
Experiment with “Try it for free” or “Bring a Friend” initiatives
to increase participation levels for various demographics.
Launch a Marketing and Promotion campaign to raise
awareness of the health and wellness benefits of leisure
activities and awareness of the local clubs, facilities and
organizations.
Annually survey a selection of residents to track interest in new
7-8 Ongoing $10,000
programs.
Work with the community to establish outdoor adventure
7-9 programs: hiking, paddleboard, kayaking, rock climbing, Ongoing Staff time
equestrian, and nature appreciation.
Review and update the Joint Use Agreement with the School
7-10 District to improve opportunities for programming the x 1-3 years Staff time
gymnasiums.
Collaborate with the Regional District of Okanagan
Similkameen, Penticton Indian Band, Interior Health and
7-11 neighbouring communities to identify service gaps, overlaps Ongoing Staff time
and opportunities to expand recreation services on a joint
regional scale.
137
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Recreation Programming - Children and Families
Increase family programming and provide more flexibility in

programs, especially unstructured/ drop-in programs.
Identify opportunities for concurrent programs for parents and
children of different ages.
Explore the potential for a child-minding facility near the
aquatic centre.
Explore with residents where more free/low cost programs are
most needed.
7-16 Review the ice allocation policy to expand family skating. 3-7 years Staff time
Recreation Programming - Youth
Undertake a youth visioning process including a broad range

of youth and youth serving agencies (police, school, coaches,
7-17 boys and girls clubs, health authority) to develop a Youth x 1-3 years Staff time
Engagement Strategy and clearly define the role of the District
in the delivery of youth services.
Revise the Terms of Reference for the Parks and Recreation
Commission to include one youth representative.
Encourage all clubs and associations to host more introductory
programs for youth such as pickleball.
Assess the potential of social marketing to communicate with
youth.
Recreation Programming - Adults
Experiment with more flexible program times and drop-

7-21 in programs to overcome lack of time as a barrier to 1-3 years Staff time
participation.
Recreation Programming - Seniors
Work with the Summerland Drop In Recreation Centre and

related agencies to determine gaps in program services and
the best means to deliver programs, particularly for fitness,
wellness, health, independence.
7-23 Based on the above, expand programming for seniors. x 1-3 years Staff time
138
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Environmental Programming
Work in conjunction with local natural history clubs to offer

7-24 environmental awareness programs and host events that raise 3-7 years Staff time
environmental awareness.
Promote environmental awareness through District programs
and events.
7-26 Add interpretive signage in parks and trails. 3-7 years $2,000 per sign
Tourism and Special Events
Given staff’s limited capacity, the Recreation Department

7-27 should continue to focus on core community programs, x 1-3 years Staff time
services and special family events within their mandate.
Continue to work with the Chamber to identify opportunities
7-28 for tourism/ special events as part of Economic Development 1-3 years Staff time
Initiatives.
Work with Destination BC to help market parks and recreation
programs to the seasonal tourist.
Initiate an Events Policy to guide the coordination, planning,
and administration of events including, fees, venues,
approval process, contacts, and volunteers, acceptable and
unacceptable events.
As part of the Events Policy, explore potential for corporate
7-31 donations, sponsorships and naming rights of facilities, 3-7 years Staff time
programs and events that support tourism.
Financial Review
8-1 Conduct a regional review of recreation fees and charges 1-3 years Staff time
Explore with residents where more free/low cost programs are
most needed.
Explore more opportunities to increase recreation revenues in
all other areas to offset the cost of recreation services.
Develop policy around commercial use in parks as potential
source of revenue
Conduct an organizational review of the Recreation
department to analyze current staff levels and determine
appropriate resources to meet required program and service
delivery demands.
139
HIGH ESTIMATED
PRIORITY COST
Develop a Departmental Operational Plan for the Recreation
department to outline the roles and responsibilities, define
the Mission statement, purpose, core programs and services,
expected outcomes, and community benefits.
Parks and Recreation Commission
Change the name and terms of reference from Parks and

8-7 Recreation Commission to Parks and Recreation Advisory x 1-3 years Staff time
Committee.
Revise Section 5 of the bylaw by expanding membership to
include a youth representative from Summerland Secondary
School and a senior’s representative from the Summerland
Seniors Drop-in Centre.
Fully engage the Commission in a more proactive and regular
manner to assist with implementation of the Master Plan, to
monitor ongoing performance, to assist in annually setting
priorities and reporting progress to Council.
Revise section 7(a) to read: “The Commission shall hold
quarterly meetings with additional meetings as required.
Amend the Parks Regulation Bylaw authority to be the Chief

8-11 7+ years Staff time
Administrative Officer or designate.
Amend the Parks Regulation Bylaw to exclude the Peach
Orchard Campground and the Rodeo Grounds.
Amend section (3l) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw by deleting
8-13 reference to bicyclists therefore permitting cycling in all parks 7+ years Staff time
unless specifically identified as not permitted.
Amend section (3d) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw to permit
horseback riding in Conkle Mountain Park.
Amend section (3d) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw for any
change in the location of off-leash parks.
Amend section (3p) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw to permit
8-16 skateboarding in designated areas only, or those areas where 7+ years Staff time
permission to skateboard has been granted.
Develop a joint use agreement with School District 67 for

shared use of District and school facilities.
140
Appendix A
Engagement
Activities
This Appendix provides details on the engagement activities conducted during development of this
Master Plan. A multi-faceted approach was used for engagement, to reach as many community
members and stakeholders as possible.
Community members
• Open house to gather input to Master Plan: June 19, 2017 – approx. 60 participants
• Telephone survey – 200 responses
• Online/hardcopy questionnaire – 268 responses
• Display at Aquatic Centre
• Booth at Farmer’s Market, July 23, 2017
• Youth engagement
–– Interactive display at Summerland Middle School, Oct. 5, 2017 – approx. 30 participants
–– Workshop with Leadership class at Summerland Secondary School, Oct. 6, 2017 – approx.
25 participants
• Open house to gather feedback on draft master plan: May 9, 2018 – approx. 100 participants
• Online questionnaire for feedback on draft master plan – 125 responses
• Page on District website
141
Stakeholders
• Group interviews
–– Park users
–– Trails groups
–– Outdoor field users
–– Indoor
–– Chamber of Commerce and Service Clubs
• Questionnaires
Steering Committee
• Visioning workshop
• Meetings at key milestones
• Review of draft master plan
Council
• Visioning workshop
• Participation at open houses
• Presentation of Final Master Plan
Staff
• Meetings with staff to gather input to plan
• Staff review of draft master plan
142
The following stakeholder groups provided input to the Master Plan:
Action Festival
Active Sports for Active Seniors
Golden Jets
Ladies Broomball (questionnaire only)
Lakeshore Racquets Club
Old Timers Hockey
Orca Swim Club
Orca Swim Club Masters
Over-55 Masters Soccer Team
Peach Orchard Campground operator
Pickleball Club
South Okanagan Dirt Bike Club
South Okanagan Fencing Assn.
South Okanagan Recope Society
South Okanagan Trail Alliance
Summerland ATV
Summerland Chamber of Commerce
Summerland Dog Owners’ Association
Summerland Environmental Science Group
Summerland Figure Skating
Summerland Kinsmen Club
Summerland Kiwanis Club
Summerland Ladies Hockey
Summerland Minor Fastball
Summerland Minor Hockey
Summerland Rodeo Grounds Equine Development Committee
Summerland Rotary Club
Summerland Skatepark Committee
Summerland Steam
Trails of the Okanagans Society
TriPower Triathlon Club
143
Appendix B
Survey Summary
144
August 2017
Summerland Parks and Recreation

Master Plan Research
Foreword
Introduction Telephone Survey Methodology, cont.
The following report summarizes the findings from a District of Interviewing was conducted by Mustel Group interviewers
Summerland survey regarding current usage habits and opinions of weekday evenings and during the day on weekends from June
local parks, tails and recreational services and facilities. The survey 19th to 27th, 2017.
was administered by telephone among a random selection of
residents, and was available on-line to residents, visitors and The questionnaire used is appended.
stakeholders interested in expressing their opinions.
Detailed computer tabulations are provided under separate
Telephone Survey Methodology cover.
A total of 200 interviews were conducted by telephone with a Open-Access On-line Survey Methodology
random selection of residents, 18 years of age or over.
A total of 268 residents participated in the open access survey
The margin of error on the sample is +/-6.9% at the 95% that was made available at the time of the telephone survey, and
confidence level. remained open up until July 31.
Specific steps were taken to insure the sample is representative The analysis of findings in this report focuses on the random
of the community at large including: survey results but the findings from the online survey are
displayed in the charts. The online results should however be
• sample drawn at random from an up-to-date database of interpreted with caution as the findings may not be reflective of
published residential listings and cell phone listings; the broader community.
• next birthday method employed to randomize respondent
selection within the household;
• up to 6 calls made to each household/individual to reduce
potential bias due to non-response;
• final sample weighted by gender within age to match
Statistics Canada Census data.
2
Executive Overview
Recreation and Cultural Activities Habits and Barriers Use of Private Indoor Facilities or Those Outside Summerland
Types of Activities: Walking for exercise is the most popular Use: One-third of residents say they use privately operated
recreation and cultural activity among Summerland residents. This indoor facilities or those that are located in other cities
is followed by theatre and live performances, biking, swimming (34%).
(outdoor and indoor), going to the beach, and water sports such as
kayaking, canoeing and fishing. Reasons for Use: The most common reason for using a
private facility or visiting another city is simply for a bigger or
The most popular activities participated in by children are better facility or one that provides more options (50%), while
swimming, hockey, skating or curling, and water sports such as more than one-third of those using private facilities or
kayaking, canoeing or fishing. another city do so for their wider variety of programs or
activities (39%).
Barriers: Lack of time, followed by physical limitations are the main
reasons for not participating more often in recreational or cultural Frequency: Among those that use a private facility or visit
activities. another city, two-thirds do so at least once-a-week or more,
with a further 19% doing so at least once a month.
Indoor Facilities: Centre Stage theatre and the Summerland Aquatic
and Fitness Centre are the most commonly used public indoor Facilities or Programs Lacking: When asked what indoor
recreational or cultural facilities, though the Summerland Arena facilities or programs might be lacking in Summerland, the
Complex and Curling Club is also popular. most common suggestion is to expand and update the
aquatic centre including adding family changing rooms,
Frequency: Health and fitness facilities (Aquatic Centre and Arena) switching to a salt water pool and expanding opening hours
are used most frequently, with the large majority of users in each (18%).
case using the facility at least once a month or more often.
Cultural facilities such as the Centre Stage Theatre and Youth Centre
are somewhat more likely to be used about once every two to three
months or less often.
Satisfaction: The large majority, eight-in-ten or more of those
residents that currently use the recreational and cultural facilities
are either very or somewhat satisfied with each of them. 3
Executive Overview (cont.)
Parks, Trails and Open Spaces Preferences to Pay for Improvements

Frequency: About two-thirds of all residents use parks, trails, Residents appear open to a combination of tax increases
and open spaces in Summerland at least once-a-week or more and increasing user fees (40%) to pay for improvements.
(65%), with a further 21% doing so at least once a month.
Used Most Often: Summerland residents make use of a wide
variety of parks and trails in the area with the most popular
being Giants Head Park, Peach Orchard Park and Rotary Beach.
Satisfaction: The large majority of residents are satisfied with
the parks, trails, and open spaces provided by the District of
Summerland with 87% satisfied, including about half that say
they are ‘very’ satisfied.
Outdoor recreation areas receive the highest assessment for
being sufficient in numbers (54% provide a rating of very good
or excellent), sufficiently maintained (52% provide a rating of
very good or excellent), and well distributed (50% provide a
rating of very good or excellent).
Lacking or in Need of Improvement: the few suggestions
offered generally include better maintenance, expanding
number of recreation areas/parks, expanding activities for
children/youth, upgrading washroom and improving access.
4
Detailed Findings
5
Recreation or Cultural Activities Participated in on Regular Basis
Random Survey Online • Walking for exercise is the most common

Walking for exercise 57% 75% outdoor recreational activity, with more than
Theatre/ music/ live performances 32% 34%
half reporting to do so on a regular basis
Bicycle (outdoor) 29% 56%
Swimming/ going to the beach 29% 70% (57%).
Water sports-other(kayaking, canoeing, fishing) 29% 35%
Gardening 24% 51% • Residents participate in a wide range of
Swimming (indoor) 20% 44% other activities. Just some of these,
Golf 19% 18%
Hiking 17% 5%
participated in by 20% to 32% of residents
Hockey/ ice skating/ curling 15% 27% include: theatre and live performances,
Workout centre with cardio and strength/ weights 14% 33% biking, swimming (outdoor and indoor),
Softball/ baseball/ slo-pitch 11% 22% going to the beach, gardening, and water
Arts and crafts 10% 26%
Running/ jogging 10% 29%
sports such as kayaking, canoeing and
Fitness classes/ aerobics classes 9% 31% fishing.
Tennis 9% 15%
Skiing 9% 1% • Apart from walking, theatre and gardening,
Gymnasium sports (basketball, volleyball, etc.) 6% 17% younger residents are somewhat more likely
Photography 6% 18%
Camping 5% 1% to do all the above activities.
Soccer 3% 16%
Pilates/ yoga 3% 22% • As the list of activities was provided for
Pickleball 3% 6% residents completing the on-line survey (for
Equestrian 2% 4%
Triathlons 9%
respondent ease), higher levels report doing
1%
Dance <1% 16% many of the above activities, as well as such
Walking dog -- 13% activities as fitness and aerobics classes, arts
Other 10% 5% and crafts, photography, and dog walking,
None 6% 1%
activities that were not readily thought in the
Base: Total Random (n=200) context of the question in the telephone
Total online (n=268) survey.
Q.1) What recreational or cultural activities do you participate in on a regular basis? Please think of both 6
Reason For Not Participating More Often
Random Survey Online • Lack of time, followed by physical limitations

Time 46% 46% are the main reasons for not participating more
often in recreational or cultural activities.
Physical limitations 26% 8%
• Those completing the online survey are also
Cost 15% 28% more likely to report ‘cost’, ‘lack of facilities’
and ‘lack of information about programs/
Lack of facilities/ amenities 12% 37% services’ as barriers. But again note that the list
was provided on the online survey, whereas
Lack of programs/ services 11% 24% the question was open-ended on the telephone
Lack of information about programs/ survey.
7% 21%
services
Other 2% 8%
Nothing/ lack of interest 19% 15%

Q.2) What, if anything, prevents you from participating in recreation or cultural activities more often?
7
Children Under 18 Years of Age Living at Home
Random Survey Online

• Approximately one-in-five residents have children
under the age of 18 years, compared with about
Yes one-third of those completing online.
47%
Yes No
21% 79%
No
53%
Prefer not
to say
1%

Q.3) Do you have children under the age of 18 years of age living at home?
8
Types of Recreation/Cultural Activities Children Enjoy
Random Online
Base: Those with children under 18 living at home (38) (125)
% %
Swimming (indoor) 63 81
Swimming/ going to the beach 56 83
Hockey/ ice skating/ curling 48 51
Water sports – other (kayaking, canoeing, fishing, etc.) 39 38 • The most popular activities participated in by
Walking for exercise 26 30
children are swimming, hockey, skating or
Bicycle (outdoors) 25 74
Soccer 25 50
curling, and water sports such as kayaking,
Softball/ baseball/ slo-pitch 24 31 canoeing or fishing.
Dance 24 37
Theatre/ music/ live performances 23 31 • Also popular are walking, biking, soccer, softball
Hiking 16 3 and dance.
Running/ jogging 15 34
Skiing 15 1
Gymnasium sports (basketball, volleyball, etc.) 13 51 • As the list of activities was provided for online
Golf 13 14 respondents, higher levels were reported for
Fitness classes/ aerobics classes 7 14 many of the activities.
Martial arts 7 2
Equestrian 7 -
Arts and crafts 6 58
Tennis 6 20
Skateboarding 6 2
Camping 4 -
Lacrosse 4 2
Triathlons 2 18
Workout centre with cardio and strength equipment, weights 2 14
Photography 2 9
Gardening 2 14
Pilates/yoga - 6
Walking the dog - 2
Pickleball - 1
None 3 1
Q.4) What type of recreational or cultural activities does your child or children enjoy? 9
Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities Used

• Centre Stage theatre and the
Summerland Aquatic and Fitness
Centre Stage Theatre 56% 46% Centre are the most commonly
used public indoor recreational or
Summerland Aquatic & Fitness Centre 52% 66% cultural facilities.
Summerland Arena Complex & Curling

40% 40% • The Summerland Arena Complex
Club
and Curling Club is also popular.
Youth Centre 15% 14%
• Approximately one-in-five
residents do not use any of the
Summerland Baptist Church gym 9% 3%
listed public indoor recreational
Summerland Asset Development or cultural facilities.
1% 0%
• Online respondent use of these
None of these 21% 19% facilities does not differ
significantly from that of the
telephone respondents.

Q.5) Which of the following indoor public recreation or cultural facilities do you use?
10
Frequency of Using Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities
• This chart details the frequency of

Summerland Aquatic & Random (n=106) 29% 10% 17% 13% 11% 20%
use among users of each facility.
Fitness Centre Online (n=176) 49% 14% 9% 10% 11% 7%
• Health and fitness facilities are
Summerland Arena Random (n=80) 22% 13% 18% 14% 7% 26% used most frequently, with the
Complex & Curling Club Online (n=106) 19% 24% 11% 13% 26% 7% large majority of users in each
case using the facility at least once
a month or more often.
Random (n=17*) 14% 59% 10% 17%
Summerland Baptist
Church Gym Online (n=8*) 13% 50% 13% 13% 13% • Cultural facilities such as the
Centre Stage Theatre and Youth
Random (n=32) 9% 23% 6 12% 14% 37% Centre are somewhat more likely
Youth Centre to be used about once every two
Online (n=37) 11% 24% 11% 11% 24% 16%
to three months or less often.
Random (n=117) 2 8% 39% 51%
Centre Stage Theatre • In most cases, findings do not vary
Online (n=122) 3 10% 38% 48% significantly by gender or age, or
among online respondents.
Summerland Asset Random (n=2*) 59% 41%
Development Initiative Online (n=0)
(SADI) Youth Club
More than once a week About once a week

About every 2-3 weeks About once a month
About once every 2-3 months Less often
Base: Total that use the facility
Q.6) How often do you use... 11

Satisfaction with Public Indoor Recreation or Culture Facilities
Total
Satisfied
Centre Stage Theatre Random (n=117) 60% 36% 4 95%

• This chart details the
satisfaction levels among users
Online (n=122) 34% 42% 15% 5 3 76%
of each facility.
Summerland Aquatic & Random (n=106) 46% 38% 8% 7% 84% • The large majority of those
Fitness Centre
Online (n=176) 17% 34% 13% 26% 9% 2 51% residents that currently use
the recreational and cultural
Summerland Arena Random (n=80) 33% 46% 15% 6 facilities are either very or
79%
Complex & Curling Club somewhat satisfied with them.
Online (n=106) 22% 46% 13% 11% 5 3 68%
• Satisfaction does do not vary

Youth Centre Random (n=32) 54% 40% 33 94% significantly by gender or age,
Online (n=37) 22% 38% 24% 16% 60% or among online respondents,
with the exception of the
Summerland Baptist Random (n=17*) 53% 27% 11% 10% Summerland Aquatic and
80%
Church Gym Fitness Centre, with which
Online (n=8*) 50% 25% 13% 13% 75%
online respondents are
Summerland Asset somewhat more likely to
Random (n=2*) 100% 100%
Development Initiative express some level of
Online (n=0) n/a dissatisfaction compared with
(SADI) Youth Club
the telephone respondents.
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Base: Total that use the facility Very Dissatisfied
Q.7) How satisfied are you with... 12

Use of Private Indoor Facilities or Those in Located in Other Cities
Random Survey Online • One-third of residents say they use

privately operated indoor facilities or
those that are located in other cities
Yes
(34%).
56%
Yes No • A similar proportion of those

66%
34% responding online report to do the
No same (41%, not significantly different at
44% these sample sizes).

Q.8a) Do you use privately operated indoor facilities (e.g., Pilates/ yoga centre) or go to other cities to use
facilities (like Penticton pool)? 13
Reasons For Using Private Facilities and Those in Other Cities
Base: Total use either privately operated indoor facilities

Random Online • The most common reason for using a
(66) (149)
or go to other cities to use facilities
% %
private facility or visiting another city is
simply for a bigger or better facility or
Better facilities (i.e. more options, bigger) 50 60 one that provides more options (50%).
Variety of programs/ actives available 39 20
Atmosphere (type of clientele, facility amenities, • More than one-third of residents also
25 6 choose other facilities for their wider
etc.)
Hours of operation/ schedules 21 16 variety of programs or activities (39%),
No facilities available locally 17 8 with one-quarter that prefer the
Convenience to another location 18 5
atmosphere of other facilities.
More affordable 9 7
• Online respondents report similar
Quality of instructors/ staff 4 5
reasons.
No reason - 13
Q8b) Why do you use these facilities?
14
Frequency of Using Private Indoor Facilities or Those Outside
Summerland

• Among those that use a private facility
or visit another city, two-thirds do so at
More than once a week 53% 40% least once-a-week or more, with a
further 19% doing so at least once a
About once a week 12% 20% month.
About once every 2-3 weeks 10% 9% • Frequency amongst online respondents
does not differ significantly at these
About once a month 9% 14% sample sizes.
About once every 2-3 months 10% 10%
Less often 7% 5%
Not stated -- 1%
Base: Total use either privately operated indoor facilities or go to other cities to use facilities
Random (n=66)
Online (n=149)
Q.8c) And how often do you use these facilities? 15

Indoor Recreation Facilities/ Programs that are Lacking or In Need of
Improvement
• Less than half of all residents could think of

Random Online a facility or program lacking or in need of
(200) (268)
% % improvement (42%).
Expand/ update Aquatic Centre (family changing rooms,

18 37
• The most common suggestion is to expand
stop using chlorine, hours of operation, etc.) and update the Aquatic Centre including
Expand/ update arena (new rink surface, another rink, adding family changing rooms, switching to
10 11
concession services, etc.)
a salt water pool and expanding opening
More age specific programs/ activities 9 14
hours (18%).
Gym/ work out facilities 7 15
Courts (tennis, basketball, etc.) 6 10 • Some other suggestions, each made by one-
Arts theatre 4 1 in-ten or fewer include expanding and
Fitness programs (yoga, gymnastics, etc.) 3 13 updating the arena, providing more age
More programs/ activities in general 3 - specific programs and activities, providing a
Indoor walking track 2 3 gym and workout facility, and more tennis
Bowling alley 1 - and basketball courts.
Movie theatre 1 -
Miscellaneous 1 <1 • Online suggestions echo many of those from
None 58 35 the telephone survey except with a higher
proportion calling for expansion/updating
Q.9) What indoor recreation facilities or programs are lacking or needing improvement in
Summerland? the aquatic centre, a gym and workout
facility and more fitness programs such as
yoga and gymnastics.
16
Satisfaction with Outdoor Recreation Spaces Provided by the

• Satisfaction levels are quite high with the parks,
trails, and open spaces provided by the District of
Very satisfied 49% 25% Summerland with 87% of residents reporting to
be satisfied, including about half that say they
are ‘very’ satisfied.
Somewhat satisfied 39% 48%
• Online respondents are somewhat more critical
with almost three-quarters satisfied (73%), and
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 7% 9%
17% dissatisfied.
Somewhat dissatisfied 5% 13%
Very Dissatisfied 2% 4%
Not Stated -- 2%
Total satisfied: 87% 73%

Q.10) Now thinking of outdoor recreation, overall, how satisfied are you with the parks, trails, and open
spaces provided by the District of Summerland? 17
Frequency of Using Parks, Trails and Open Spaces in Summerland

• About two-thirds of all residents use
parks, trails, and open spaces in
More than once a week 41% 69% Summerland at least once a week or
more (65%), with a further 21% doing
About once a week 24% 17% so at least once a month.
About once every 2-3 weeks 10% 8% • Those completing online tend to be
more frequent users of Summerland’s
About once a month 11% 2% parks, trails, and open spaces, with
three-quarters reporting that they use
About once every 2-3 months 4% 1% them more than once a week.
Less often 11% 2%
Not Stated -- 1%

Q.11) How often do you use parks, trails, and open spaces in Summerland?
18
Parks or Trails Used Most Often
Random Online
(200) (268)
% %
Giants Head Park 42 64
• Summerland residents make use of a
Peach Orchard Park 37 61
Rotary Beach 35 60
wide variety of parks and trails in the
Memorial Park 28 44 area with the most popular being
Dale Meadows Park 25 47 Giants Head Park, Peach Orchard Park
Trans Canada Trail 23 50 and Rotary Beach.
Powell Beach Park 21 44
Dog Beach 17 41 • Other popular parks and trails include
Summerland Lakeshore Loop 17 35 Memorial Park, Dale Meadows Park the
Crescent Beach 13 12 Trans Canada Trail and Powell Beach
Conkle Mountain Park 11 33 Park.
Rodeo Grounds 9 19
Summerland Centennial Trail 8 25 • Again note that the list was provided
Living Memorial Park 8 9 for on-line respondents, hence the
Kinsmen Park 8 12 higher response rate for most parks.
Spray Park 7 24
Brigade Trail Linear Park 7 3
Peach Orchard Campground 5 11
Julia Park 3 12
Butler St. Park 2 5
Priest Camp Historic Park 2 3
Turner Park 2 <1
Landry Trail Park 1 5
Beaver Park 1 1
None of these 8 3
Q.12) And which parks or trails do you use most often?
19
Assessment of Summerland’s Parks, Trails and Open Spaces
Sufficient in numbers Random 18% 37% 32% 9% 23 • The majority of residents rate each
Online 11% 26% 33% 17% 9% 4 attribute of Summerland parks, trails
and open spaces at least ‘good’.
Well distributed throughout Random 16% 33% 35% 11%1%4
the community Online 10% 35% 31% 14% 5 5 • They receive the highest assessment for
being sufficient in numbers (54%
Sufficiently maintained Random 15% 37% 33% 10% 3 3 provide a rating of very good or
Online 7% 33% 34% 19% 53 excellent), sufficiently maintained (52%
provide a rating of very good or
Variety of amenities Random 11% 28% 34% 16% 2 9% excellent), and well distributed (50%
provided Online 5 25% 37% 18% 10% 5 provide a rating of very good or
excellent).
Physically accessible to those Random 8% 23% 29% 11% 4 23%
with mobility issues Online 3 16% 17% 18% 7% 40% • Online respondents tend to be far more
critical, particularly on the number of
parks, trails and open spaces, their
Excellent Very good Good accessibility, and the variety of
Fair Poor Don't know amenities.

Q.13) How would you rate Summerland parks, trails, and open spaces for being:
20
Park Facilities/Amenities Lacking/Needing Improvement
Random Online
(200) (268)
% %
Specific Location: 22 38
Peach Orchard Park/ Beach (maintenance, playground, improve • Suggestions for specific park
6 6
access/ pedestrian safety, expand/ upgrade washrooms) improvements generally include better
Memorial Park (expand/ upgrade washrooms, playground, splash maintenance, expanding number of
4 9
pool/ pad)
recreation areas/parks, expanding
Summerland Lakeshore Loop (expand toward Penticton,
3 1 activities for children/youth, upgrading
maintenance, improve pedestrian safety)
Rotary Beach (maintenance, playground, expand/ upgrade washroom and improving access.
3 3
washrooms)
Giants Head Trail/ (mountain bike trails, maintenance, erosion repair) 3 5
Trans Canada Trail/ (KVR) Kettle Valley Railway Trail (expansion,
3 2
maintenance
Giants Head Park (maintenance, playground, washrooms) 1 6
Julia Park (expand/ upgrade washrooms, playground) 1 5
Summerland Centennial Trail/ Bristow Trail (maintenance, erosion
1 1
repair, trail markers/ signage)
Dale Meadows Park (Expand / upgrade washrooms) 1 4
Conkie Mountain Park (more biking/ walking trails) 1 3
Cartwright Trail 1 3
Sun Oka Beach Provincial Park 1 <1
Gartrall Trail (maintenance, erosion repair) 1 -
Turner Park (needs amenities/ facilities) <1 -
Rodeo Grounds (update facility, new jumps) - 3
Powell Beach (maintenance, playground) - 2
Priest Camp - <1
Brigade Trail and Linear Park - <1
Q.14) . What parks, trails and open spaces facilities or amenities are lacking or needing improvement in
Summerland? 21
Park Facilities/Amenities Lacking/Needing Improvement
(cont’d)
Random Online
(200) (84)
% %
• Besides general maintenance, some
Improve maintenance for all facilities/ trails/ beaches (widen trails,
signage/ marked trails, mobility issues, benches)
18 27 other suggestions include
Bike lanes/ trails (improve safety, more trails, add bike lanes on roads,
improvements to bike trails, sports
9 9 fields and outdoor courts.
maintenance)
Improve/ expand public washroom facilities 9 2
Outdoor recreation facilities (exercise equipment, playgrounds, skate • Suggestions from online respondents
8 9
parks) are similar to those from the telephone
Sports fields/ courts (need more, improve maintenance) 6 5 survey, with the exception of a larger
Connection between trails and downtown 3 6 number calling for an increase in dog
More dog (fenced) parks/ areas 2 25 parks.
Improve waterfront access (wharf, maintenance) 2 3
More public boat moorage/ launches 1 <1
More parking 1 -
Miscellaneous 1 4
No response 54 24
Q.14) What parks, trails and open spaces facilities or amenities are lacking or needing improvement in
Summerland?
22
Preferred Methods of Paying to Improve Parks, Trails and Open Spaces
Random Online
• The most commonly suggested method
Increase taxes
of paying for improvements is a
24% 21%
combination of taxes and user fees
Increase user fees 12% 6% (40%).
Combination of taxes and user fees 40% 55% • Opinion amongst online respondents
largely reflects that of the random
Other 17% 17%
sample.
- Provincial/ federal govt. funding/ grants 8% 1%
- Better allocation of current funds 5% 2%
- Fundraising/ donations 3% 2%
Other 1% 12%
Don't know 8% 1%

Q.15) How would you prefer that Summerland pays for any new or improved parks, recreation, services
and facilities? 23
Demographics
Demographic Profile
Random Online
(200) (268)
% %
Gender
Male 47 30 • The random sample was
Female 53 69 weighted to match census
Prefer not to say - 2 statistics on the basis of age
Age within gender. The on-line
18 to 24 7 3
survey sample is unweighted.
25 to 34 9 12
35 to 44 11 25
45 to 54 15 22
55 to 64 23 24
65 to 74 years 19 12
75 years and over 17 2
Prefer not to say - 1
Family Status
Person living alone 18 5
Person living with parents 10 1
Person living with friends 2 <1
Spouse or partner, no children at home 44 38
Spouse or partner with children at home 25 49
Single parent with children at home 1 4
Prefer not to say - 3
Primary/ Seasonal Residence
Primary residence 97 99
Seasonal residence 3 <1 Continued…
25
Demographic Profile
Random Online
(200) (268)
% %
Employment
Employed 51 65
Retired 44 29
Homemaker and not employed outside
3 6
the home
Unemployed and looking for work 1 1
Student 5 1
Prefer not to say 1 1
Home Tenure
Own 84 87
Rent 10 11
Prefer not to say 6 2
Years Lived in Summerland
Less than 10 years 15 34
10 to 19 32 29
20 to 29 24 22
30 to 39 14 9
40 to 49 9 3
50 to 59 2 2
60+ 3 2
Prefer not to say 1 <1
26
Questionnaire
Parks and Recreation Master Plan Questionnaire
Welcome to our survey on parks and recreation services in the District of Summerland about parks and
recreation facilities and services to help develop long term plans for the community.
1. What recreational or cultural activities do you participate in on a regular basis? Please think of both
CHECK ALL THAT APPLY
1 14
Arts and crafts Softball/baseball/slo-pitch
2 15
Bicycle (outdoors) Swimming (indoor)
3 16
Dance Swimming/ going to the beach
4 17
Fitness classes/aerobics classes Tennis
5 18
Gardening Theatre/music/live performances
6 19
Golf Walking for exercise
7 20
Gymnasium sports (basketball, volleyball, Water sports-other (kayaking, canoeing,
etc.) fishing, etc.)
8 21
Hockey/ice skating/curling Workout center with cardio and strength
9 equipment, weights
Pickleball
22
10 Triathlons
Pilates/yoga
96
11 Other: _____________________
Photography
97
12 None
Running/jogging
13
Soccer
2. What, if anything, prevents you from participating in recreation or cultural activities more often?
1 5
Cost Lack of facilities/ amenities
2 6
Time Physical limitations
3 96
Lack of information about programs/services Other: ______________________
4 97
Lack of programs/services Nothing
Mustel Research Group Page 1

3. Do you have children under the age of 18 years of age living at home?
1
Yes
2
No
4. What type of recreational or cultural activities does your child or children enjoy?
1 14
Arts and crafts Softball/baseball/slo-pitch
2 15
Bicycle (outdoors) Swimming (indoor)
3 16
Dance Swimming/ going to the beach
4 17
Fitness classes/aerobics classes Tennis
5 18
Gardening Theatre/music/live performances
6 19
Golf Walking for exercise
7 20
Gymnasium sports (basketball, volleyball, Water sports-other (kayaking, canoeing,
etc.) fishing, etc.)
8 21
Hockey/ice skating/curling Workout center with cardio and strength
9 equipment, weights
Pickleball
22
10 Triathlons
Pilates/yoga
96
11 Other: ______________________
Photography
97
12 None
Running/jogging
13
Soccer
5. Which of the following indoor public recreation or cultural facilities do you use?
1
Summerland Aquatic & Fitness Centre
2
Summerland Arena Complex & Curling Club
3
Centre Stage Theatre
4
Youth Centre
8
Summerland Asset Development Initiative (SADI) Youth Club
9
Summerland Baptist Church gym
97
None of these

B854 District of Summerland Parks and Recreation Master Plan Research
6. How often do you use...
More
than About
once About once About About once
a once a every 2-3 once a every 2-3 Less
week week weeks month months often
Summerland Aquatic & Fitness 6 5 4 3 2 1
Centre
Summerland Arena Complex & 6 5 4 3 2 1
Curling Club
6 5 4 3 2 1
6 5 4 3 2 1
Youth Centre
Summerland Asset Development 6 5 4 3 2 1
6 5 4 3 2 1
7. How satisfied are you with each of the following facilities?

Neither
Very Somewhat satisfied nor Somewhat Very
satisfied satisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied
Summerland Aquatic & Fitness 5 4 3 2 1
Centre
Summerland Arena Complex & 5 4 3 2 1
Curling Club
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
Youth Centre
Summerland Asset Development 5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1

8a. Do you use privately operated indoor facilities (e.g., Pilates/ yoga centre) or go to other cities to use
indoor facilities (like Penticton pool)?
1
Yes
2
No
IF YES TO 8A: 8b. Why do you use these facilities?
IF YES TO 8A: 8c. And how often do you use these facilities?
6
More than once a week
5
About once a week
4
About once every 2-3 weeks
3
About once a month
2
About once every 2-3 months
1
Less often
9. What indoor recreation facilities or programs are lacking or needing improvement in Summerland?

10. Now thinking of outdoor recreation, overall, how satisfied are you with the parks, trails, and open
spaces provided by the District of Summerland?
5
Very satisfied
4
Somewhat satisfied
3
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
2
Somewhat dissatisfied
1
Very dissatisfied
11. How often do you use parks, trails, and open spaces in Summerland?
6
More than once a week
5
About once a week
4
About once every 2-3 weeks
3
About once a month
2
About once every 2-3 months
1
Less often
12. And which parks or trails do you use most often?

Check all that apply
1 10 18
Beaver Park Kinsmen Park Rodeo Grounds
2 11 19
Brigade Trail Linear Park Landry Trail Park Rotary Beach
3 12 20
Butler St Park Living Memorial Park Spray Park
4 13 21
Conkle Mountain Park Memorial Park Summerland Centennial
5 14 Trail
Crescent Beach Peach Orchard
22
6 Campground Summerland Lakeshore
Dale Meadows Park
15 Loop
7 Peach Orchard Park
Dog Beach 23
16 Trans Canada Trail
8 Powell Beach Park
Giants Head Park 24
17 Turner Park
9 Priest Camp Historic
Julia Park 97
Park None of these

13. How would you rate Summerland parks, trails, and open spaces for being:
Very DON'T
Excellent good Good Fair Poor KNOW
5 4 3 2 1 98
Sufficiently maintained?
Physically accessible to those with mobility 5 4 3 2 1 98
issues?
5 4 3 2 1 98
Sufficient in numbers?
5 4 3 2 1 98
Variety of amenities provided?
Well distributed throughout the 5 4 3 2 1 98
community?
14. What parks, trails and open spaces facilities or amenities are lacking or needing improvement in
Summerland?
15. How would you prefer that Summerland pays for any new or improved parks, recreation, services
and facilities?
1
Increase taxes
2
Increase user fees
3
Combination of taxes and user fees
96
Other: please describe ______________________

We have just a few more questions to ensure we are speaking to a representative group of people in the
community.
A. Are you:
1
Male
2
Female
99
Prefer not to say
B. Into which of the following age categories may I place you?

0
Under 18
1
18 to 24
2
25 to 34
3
35 to 44
4
45 to 54
5
55 to 64
6
65 to 74 years
7
75 years or better
99
Prefer not to say
C. Which of these situations best fits your personal family situation at present?
1
Person living alone
2
Person living with parents
3
Person living with friends
4
Spouse or partner, no children at home
5
Spouse or partner with children at home
6
Single parent with children at home
99
Prefer not to say

D. Are you:
Check all that apply
1
Employed
2
Unemployed and looking for work
3
Homemaker and not employed outside the home
4
Retired
5
Student
99
Prefer not to say
E. Do you own or rent your home?

1
Own
2
Rent
F. How many years have you lived in Summerland?
G. Is this your primary residence or do you live in Summerland seasonally?

1
Primary residence
2
Seasonal resident

Appendix C
Youth Engagement
Summary
PROCESS
Engagement with Summerland youth took place via interactive display boards during lunchtime
at Summerland Middle School on Oct. 5, 2017 and a workshop with Leadership Class students at
Summerland Secondary School on Oct. 6, 2017.
YOUTH RESPONSES
Students were asked several questions as input to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Their
responses are summarized below.
What makes Summerland good for youth?
Youth said that the close-knit, safe, walkable nature of Summerland makes it good for youth, as do
the beaches, trails, parks, schools, SADI and library. Secondary school students also noted volunteer
opportunities for special events. One Middle School student noted that having a high school in
Summerland made it good for youth, because otherwise more kids would be in Penticton.
Where do youth like to hang out and is there enough public space for youth in
Summerland?
This question was asked only of the Secondary students. The said they like to hang out at coffee shops,
the aquatic centre and arena, the gym at the Baptist Church, friends’ houses and outdoor places like
the Trestle, Giant’s Head, the beaches and Dale Meadows Park.
Students did not feel there is enough public space for youth to hang out in Summerland, that there
aren’t enough activities for youth and that everything is geared to the older population. They noted
that there isn’t much to do in Memorial Park, that the restaurants close early and there is no movie
180
theatre. They would like to see more food places/places to eat outside downtown, a new community centre,
a new youth hangout centre, and places to play or watch games indoors. It should be noted though that the
older secondary students are somewhat past the need for places to play and hang out, as they are busy with
school and work and are starting drive, making it easier for them to travel outside of town.
What activities do youth like to do and what recreation programs or activities would they like to
see in Summerland?
Youth like to do a wide range of activities, including sports, arts and crafts, and socializing with their friends.
Several students mentioned that they like to go bowling, to Loco Landing in Penticton, to arcades (younger
students only), to movies/drive-ins, and to cafes like Starbucks, and that they wished these amenities were
available in Summerland.
Sports mentioned by younger students include lacrosse, football and “more hockey!”. Older students
mentioned basketball, volleyball, soccer and track, and said that they would be interested in participating in
classes like Zumba. They suggested a Youth Try It day for fitness classes.
Athletic amenities that students said they would like to see in Summerland include an indoor gym for games
such as volleyball and basketball, a running track, indoor soccer facility, an outdoor skating rink, a gymnastics
studio, more mountain biking and bike trails, more walking trails, new FI docks, an archery club, and a drifting
school. Arts and crafts amenities students would like to see in Summerland include a crafter’s club, meme
school, Minecraft club, train-making, and ornamental garden.
Students noted that there is more to do in Penticton – the beach is bigger and has more amenities like the
Wibit, there is an amusement park, more shopping and restaurants, indoor soccer and track at the Adidas
Sportsplex, and movie theatres. Students would like to see better transit connections with Penticton.
Improvements in Summerland parks
Secondary students were asked what could be improved in Summerland’s parks. They would like to see
community gardens, more places to sit or eat such as the new BC Parks picnic tables, floating socks and slides
at the beaches, a Wibit water park, an outdoor volleyball court since the current one just has poles and no
nets. One student mentioned the Japanese garden in Penticton as a really nice place to spend time.
They would like to see more and better trails: better bike trails, paved trails, more trails around Giant’s Head,
and parks and trails signage. They would like more special places to hang out like piers and viewpoints, and
more off-leash dog parks. They would like to see more festivals, concerts and movies in parks.
They noted that Memorial Park has a huge area of grass without a lot of features, and that the washrooms are
scary. They also noted that people hang out at the bandshell to smoke and vape, and that when the pickers
are in the park they don’t go there.
181
What do youth like about the aquatic centre and what would they like to see changed or
added?
Youth like to swim, but many noted that the Aquatic Centre is dark, old, and missing amenities. One
student noted that she feels like she’s in the 1980’s when she’s in the Aquatic Centre.
Students would like to see a new/expanded/updated pool, with better lighting, and amenities like a
leisure pool, wave pool, lazy river, bigger sauna, bigger whirlpool, updated and expanded lobby, bigger
fitness centre, more change rooms and cubbies on the swim deck, and amenities for competitive
swimmers like a bigger pool, better diving blocks with starters, built in mirrors for viewing strokes, and
timing system for meets. Students noted that there are no evening programs for youth.
Some Secondary students said that a community centre with a pool, sports centre, work-out classes,
yoga studio and gym would be great, that having everything together in one place would be convenient.
What do youth like about the arena and what would they like to see changed or added?
Many youth use the arena, to play or watch hockey and to skate, and it is a special place for high school
students as the site of their graduation celebration. They noted that it is a good place to hang out and
that staff are nice, but that it would be good if there were more public skates.
Students felt that the arena is in need of an upgrade or replacement, noting the need to repair the
heaters in the seating area, update the dressing rooms, repair the roof and ceiling, update the lobby
and provide cubbies for people to store their stuff while their skating. Students would also like to see
another rink (outdoor rink).
What do youth like about the skate park and what would they like to see changed or
added?
Students said they don’t like the current skate park, that it is too small and poorly located and lacks
amenities. Younger students would like a new skate park, in a different location, with amenities such
as mini ramp and drift track down the middle of the skate park, a tech deck, vending machines, loopty-
loop, and RBG lights. Older students similarly noted that the skate park needs to be improved for the
younger kids. They also noted that nobody uses the skatepark and most people go to Penticton.
Youth involvement in summerland
One group of Secondary school students was asked if they felt that youth were well-represented in
Summerland. They did not feel youth are well-represented, that it is a town for older people. They did
note that it was more fun for them when they were younger, and because they are now leaving town
soon for university, etc., the focus should be on younger teens to encourage them to use facilities and
be involved. They noted that there needs to be follow-through on discussion with youth.
182
Another group of Secondary students said that they would like to see more activities for youth, but
that they were not sure who to contact in the Recreation Department if they wanted to organize
something. They suggested that the Leadership class could help with organizing activities for teens.
They said the best ways for the Recreation Department to make contact with Secondary students was
through the school announcements and assemblies and connecting with the Leadership class and
that Instagram is the best social media tool for reaching students.
183
Appendix D
Open House #1
Feedback
184
Parks and Recreation

Master Plan
What is a Parks and Recreation We are here!

Master Plan?
A shared vision for Summerland’s
Spring 2017 Summer 2017 Summer/Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Winter 2018
parks and recreation which:
• Identifies key issues, opportunities, Community DRAFT Parks and FINAL Parks and
and constraints. Research and Public Review of
Consultation and Recreation Recreation
Analysis the Draft Plan
Engagement Master Plan Master Plan
• Identifies community values,
interests and needs.
• Stakeholder Interviews
• Provides strategic direction to the • Public Open House #1
District of Summerland over the next Future Opportunities
• Phone and Online Survey
10 years. • Public Open House #2
• Online Questionnaire
and Feedback
Why is the plan needed?
• To ensure high quality, parks and
recreation facilities.
• To address changing demands.
• To create a shared vision for parks
and recreation.
• To focus efforts on those aspects
that reflect community values and
priorities.
DISTRICT OF SUMMERLAND
PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
185
Park Features New Park Features
What park features do you and your family use? What new features would you like to see in
Place a GREEN dot next to the features that
Summerland’s parks?
you use on a regular basis.
Write them on a post-it note here!
Children’s Play Areas
Undeveloped Natural Areas • Outdoor skating rink

• I fully support a fenced dog park. Summerland falls short!
Beaches • Need an off leash dog park that is fully fenced!
• A fully fenced dog park is a needed feature
Trails for Hiking/Walking Only • Mt. bike skills park for youth
• Skateboard park! Appeal to families to move here to create revenue & support local
Multi-use Trails (for Walking, Biking, Equestrian, etc.) businesses! More seniors don’t ll empty storefronts! Families need homes = tax
base/# Build them!!
Sports Fields • Access to local mountains for hiking
• Properly fenced large off leash area
Baseball Diamonds • Archery range
• Mini spray park in town -> Memorial Park
Outdoor Courts (Tennis, Basketball, Pickleball) • We need an outdoor dog fenced dog park in Summerland
• Please grant development of an O/L dog park – I have sooo much company & they all
want to use it!!!
Picnic Areas
• Bigger better/updated playground equipment especially in Memorial Park
Off-leash Dog Areas • Outdoor rink
• Outdoor pool & slide
Skatepark • Protect Conkle Mountain Park & Trans Canada trail as equestrian friendly trails (1 dot)
• (mini) play zones (adapted/reduced in size) e.g. disc golf, volleyball, tennis &
Spray Park
pickleball, basketball & shinney
• Need large off leash dog park
• Outdoor skating rink
• Multi use trails/mt bike trails
What other features do you use on a regular basis? • New skateboard park
• We need a real off-leash dog park. Big enough for throwing balls!
• We don’t need any designated mountain biking trails on Conkle. There are already
Write them on a post-it note here! plenty of mountain biking trails on Cartright and throughout the Okanagan.
• Well lit & shady picnic spaces
• Try a “natural” playground dedicated to one park space
• All motorized and TRUE multi-use trails including Atvs & dirt bikes. That’s what
multi-use means. (2 dots)
• Conkle-mountain Park needs to remain a non-motorized & commercial free park
with multi-use trails (1 dot)
• Conkle Mt needs to remain non-motorized (1 dot)
• ATV, dirt bike trails (5 dots)
• Conkle Mt. needs to stay open for all users, multi use! (1 dot)
186
Indoor Recreation Facilities New Indoor Recreation Facilities

What indoor recreation facilities do you and What new indoor recreation facilities would you
your family use? like to see in Summerland?
Place a YELLOW dot next to the features that Write them on a post-it note here!
you use on a regular basis.
Summerland Aquatic and Fitness Centre • New pool & recreation building to replace 40 year old building
• Martial arts space, kick boxing
Pool • Pickleball courts (1 dot)
• You overlook squash courts at Lakeshore Racquets Club + Badminton Club
Hot Tub • Indoor swimming pool
• Another ice rink
Sauna • Tennis, squash
• Outdoor gym facility at Memorial Park
Fitness Centre • Replace pool next to arena
• A bigger better pool complex
Meeting Room • 2nd ice rink, upgrade aquatic centre like Penticton, larger meeting – Banquet Room
for large events
Summerland Arena Complex and Curling Club • Tennis court or multi use indoor bubble
• Pickleball court
Ice Rink • Pickle ball
• Indoor water park (P.P.P.)
Curling Sheets • Indoor multi-purpose eld (e.g., soccer, tennis, track)
• Arts + Media Centre (video & music development especially for youth)
Banquet Room • Indoor children’s playground
Summerland Asset Development Initiative (SADI) Youth Club
Youth Centre
Summerland Baptist Church Gym
What other facilities do you use on a regular basis?
Write them on a post-it note here!
187
Summerland’s Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Priorities
in the Future Place a GREEN dot next to your top 5 priorities for Summerland’s
Place a BLUE dot next to the words/phrases that best describe parks and recreation.
Summerland’s parks and recreation in the future.
Provide space for Protect natural

children to play areas/wildlife
accessible family friendly
active fun
Provide space for Provide trails for
picnics and socializing walking/hiking
intergenerational/
age friendly healthy
artistic historical Provide trails for biking Provide space for

team sports
bird and wildlife friendly lively

Provide opportunities for Highlight Summerland’s
large group celebrations/ history and culture
casual peaceful special events
colourful pollinator friendly Provide access to Lake

Provide beach access to Okanagan for small
Lake Okanagan watercraft (kayaks, canoes,
cultural safe small sailboats, etc.)
Provide access to Lake

diverse social Okanagan for large and/or New/renovated pool and
motorized watercraft (motor Fitness Aquatic Centre
boats, large sailboats, etc.)
ecological team/sports accessible
More multi-purpose
edible New/renovated arena areas for classes like yoga
and zumba
What other words describe your vision for the New theatre New Community
future of Summerland’s parks and recreation? Centre/Gym
Write them on a post-it note here! Any other priorities for Summerland’s
parks and recreation?
• Fully fenced dog park (1 dot) Write them on a post-it note here!
• Combine culture + heritage (museum) delivery • drop-in gym time at schools after dinner
• Mountain bike trails on Conkle • Off leash dog parks (4 dots)
• Keep Cartwrite & Conkle Mt open for people to run their dogs • Need to keep all trails on Conkle mountain as multi-use non motorized to
off leash enjoy hiking, biking, and horse riding in a natural & peaceful setting
• Indoor multi-purpose eld (e.g., soccer, tennis, track) • Dire need of proper fenced dog park (1 dot)
• Off leash dog park properly fenced • New skateboard park
• We need an outdoor dog fenced dog park in Summerland (2 • Outdoor rink winter
dots) • Public access to Crown lands behind private properties
• Indoor pickleball courts • Fully fenced dog parks! (1 dot)
188
Appendix E
Community
Feedback on Draft
Master Plan
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
An Open House was held at the Summerland Arena Banquet Room on May 9, 2018 from 5:00-8:00pm.
Fourteen display boards were set up, providing detailed information on the project overview, key
findings, and recommendations. Attendees were asked to provide feedback on sticky notes, and there
was one board where attendees could show their support for some of the key recommendations with
dots (each person was given 6 dots). Attendees were informed about the availability of the online
survey (open through May 21) and were also given an option to complete a hard copy of the survey
at the open house. Approximately 100 people attended the open house.
An online survey was available between April 25, 2018 and May 21, 2018 via a link from the District of
Summerland website. The survey provided the draft master plan recommendations, organized by topic,
and asked whether respondents strongly agreed, agreed, neither agreed nor disagreed, disagreed
or strongly disagreed with the draft recommendations. Space was also provided for comments. In
addition, respondents were asked to rank various parks and recreation priorities from low to high,
with space provided for comments and additional priorities. There were 125 responses to the online
survey (including 6 hard copy surveys).
189
SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY FEEDBACK
There is a high level of community interest in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, with about 100
people attending the open house and 125 people responding to the online survey. Overall there is
considerable community support for the draft vision, principles and recommendations.
Summerland residents place a high value on their parks, pool and arena, and multi-use trails, and
some clear priorities have emerged. The highest priority identified by participants at the open house is
building a new community recreation centre with pool. Other relatively high priorities include upgrading
the arena, upgrading the Aquatic Centre, developing a Trails Master Plan, creating/protecting more
natural areas, keeping recreation affordable, creating more multi-purpose trails, installing signage on
trails, and maintaining and upgrading existing parks, and creating a multi-use trail network.
The sections below provide a summary of community feedback on draft recommendations in the
different sections of the master plan. Detailed feedback for each section is provided in the Appendix.
VISION AND PRINCIPLES
Feedback on the draft vision and principles was favourable, with 92% of survey respondents agreeing
that the draft Vision and Principles capture the overall community priorities for parks and recreation.
A few open house participants and several survey respondents provided comments on the vision and
principles. Comments included observations on the character of the Summerland community, requests
for specific parks and recreation amenities, and disagreement or agreement with one or more of the
principles. One survey respondent felt that the vision statement is too long.
SUMMERLAND’S PARK SYSTEM
Overall, community feedback was positive on the draft recommendations pertaining to Summerland’s
park system, with 82% of survey respondents agreeing with the recommendations, 6% disagreeing
and 11% neutral. The few comments made at the open house were mostly supportive of the
recommendations. Several respondents provided comments on the online survey. Some were
supportive of the recommendations, while others thought that having for parks within 5-10 minutes’
walk of all residents was not practical for more rural areas. A couple of respondents noted that using
an “as the crow flies” measure is misleading since people travel to parks using streets. Additional
comments noted the need to maintain existing parks, more pickleball courts, signage and an off-leash
dog park
SUMMERLAND’S PARKS
There was a high degree of agreement with the draft recommendations related to Summerland’s
existing parks. In the online survey, 88% of respondents agreed with the recommendations for
Summerland’s lakefront parks and 93% agreed with the recommendations for Summerland’s other
parks.
190
Many people provided comments at the open house and indicated their top 3 projects.
There were multiple responses in favour of:
• Upgrades to the Rodeo Grounds
• Upgrades to /master planning for Memorial Park
• Creating gathering places downtown and/or in Memorial Park
• A long distance swim lane
• Upgrades to washrooms
In addition, there were 2-3 responses in favour of:
• Upgrades to Powell Beach Park
• A new clubhouse at Dale Meadows Park
• A new pool/multi-use centre
• New equine facilities (Horse Beach, public xc equine course)
Several online survey respondents provided comments. Similar to the open house, there were
comments recognizing the potential and importance of the Rodeo Grounds and Memorial Park, and
the need for upgrading and planning for these parks. A few people mentioned a gathering place
downtown: two were in favour, one person didn’t think it was needed and another was unsure whether
it’s needed. Two people suggested that a spray park would be a good addition to Memorial Park and
two people identified the need to upgrade washrooms. Several people mentioned the value of Conkle
Mountain and the need for planning there. A few people identified the need to resurface the running
track at Dale Meadows Park, one person highlighted the need for permeable surfacing of the track
and parking lot, and others liked the idea of a new clubhouse. Additionally, there were comments in
favour of an off-leash dog park, off-season use of Peach Orchard Campground and making it more level
to accommodate tents, and placing a bubble over the tennis/pickleball courts in winter. One person
suggested that the District explore the possibility of purchasing the Banks Crescent property to create
a park there, protecting Shaughnessy Springs and the Summerland Trout Hatchery.
PLAYGROUNDS
Community feedback on recommendations related to Summerland’s playground was positive, with

71% of survey respondents agreeing with the draft recommendations and comments at the open
house supportive. Almost 20% of survey respondents were neutral about the recommendations and
191
9% disagreed with them. Several survey respondents provided comments. Several people liked the
idea of natural playgrounds and a few people identified areas of Summerland that they felt needed
parks or playgrounds. Several people agreed with upgrading/replacing existing playgrounds, but others
thought there were more pressing priorities.
OUTDOOR SPORTS AMENITIES
Community feedback on draft recommendations concerning outdoor sports amenities was positive,
with almost 80% of survey respondents in agreement. Only 4% of respondents disagreed, and 14%
were neutral.
Several survey respondents provided comments, which mostly concerned the new skatepark, tennis
and pickleball. Many people commented in favour of the new skatepark, while several others were not
in favour, were concerned about the location or hoped that it would be designed to accommodate a
variety of users. There were several comments in favour of expanding/upgrading tennis and pickleball
courts, but almost an equal number against. Other comments included a recommendation to buy land
now for future expansion of fields, upgrading the beach volleyball court, creating an outdoor rink/
sport court, and the need for a dog park.
Comments at the open house highlighted the need for maintaining/repairing tennis courts and more
pickleball courts. One person questioned the need for a new skatepark considering that there is one
in Penticton and another asked about badminton courts.
PLACES FOR DOGS
Almost 80% of survey respondents agreed with the draft recommendations concerning places for dogs,
while 9% disagreed and 13% were neutral. Many survey respondents provided comments, with most
in favour of expanding places for dogs in Summerland, including creation of a full-time off-leash dog
park and allowing off-season use, although some people were not in favour. Several people identified
the need for fencing of dog parks, for the safety of dogs and people. Several people observed that
more bylaw enforcement is needed, that some dog owners disregard rules concerning dogs in parks
and fail to clean up after them. Some people were in favour of more garbage cans and dog waste bags.
One person suggested requiring or encouraging a Canine Good Citizen Certificate or Tag for dogs in
off-leash dog parks, to reduce the number of aggressive or poorly-behaved dogs in these parks.
Comments at the open house were supportive of places for dogs, with suggestions for locations of
off-leash dog parks including Powell Beach and Living Memorial Park.
TRAILS
There was strong community support for the draft recommendations concerning trails, with almost
90% of survey respondents in agreement and only 2% disagreeing (7% were neutral). Comments at
the open house were generally favourable, with people in favour of multi-use trails, a cycling network
192
plan, improving conditions and safety for on-road cycling, and increasing connectivity. A few people
commented that motorized and non-motorized trail uses are not compatible. Two people commented
on the need to be able to access Crown land.
Many survey respondents provided comments. Similar to the open house, there were comments in
favour of multi-use trails, a cycling network plan and improving on-road biking. Several people noted
the need for signage and education.
INDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES
Community feedback on the draft recommendations concerning indoor facilities was positive, with
80% of survey respondents in agreement, 14% neutral and 4% disagreeing. Comments at the open
house were favourable, with many people commenting on the need for a new or upgraded aquatic
centre or a new multi-purpose community centre with pool. Several people noted the need to consider
all of the facilities available in Summerland, such as the Baptist Church, schools, Badminton Club, and
Lakeshore Racquets Club. One person suggested that the District explore partnering with the YMCA.
Two people identified the need for a second ice sheet.
Comments from the online survey were similar to the open house, with the vast majority of comments
in favour of a new/upgraded pool or a new multi-purpose community centre with pool.
SUMMERLAND AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTRE
Community response to the draft recommendations on the Summerland Aquatic and Fitness Centre
was very positive, with almost 90% of survey respondents in agreement, and over half strongly
agreeing. Only 2% of respondents disagreed and 6% were neutral.
The vast majority of comments at the open house and on the online survey were in favour of a new
pool or multi-purpose facility with pool, and several people identified this as an immediate need.
Several people also highlighted the value of the fitness area and the need for upgrading/expanding it.
SUMMERLAND ARENA AND CURLING CLUB
Community feedback on the draft recommendations concerning the Summerland Arena and Curling
Club was positive, with more than 80% of survey respondents in agreement, only 3% disagreeing and
13% neutral.
Several people identified the need to upgrade the arena, including providing for multi-use such as
lacrosse, Fall Fair, or conferences. Some people identified the need for more ice time or a second ice
sheet.
193
RECREATION PROGRAMMING
Community feedback on the draft recommendations on recreation programming was very positive,
with 86% of survey respondents in agreement, only 1% disagreeing and 11% neutral.
Many comments on the survey were in favour of expanding recreation opportunities for youth in
Summerland and creating a Youth Engagement Strategy. Other comments identified the need for more
family-friendly ice time and hockey ice time, keeping prices low, and providing drop-in and after-work
fitness opportunities and a walking track for older adults. One respondent observed that it would be
nice to have lacrosse in Summerland.
Comments at the open house were in favour of a Youth Engagement Strategy and identified the need
for more certified instructors/coaches, more classes, a bigger work-out area, and a better booking
system for parks. One person suggested a summer horse camp at the Rodeo Grounds and another
suggested a 10-year replacement plan for dual rink opportunity for Okanagan lacrosse.
RECREATION SERVICE DELIVERY
Community feedback on the draft recommendations on recreation programming was very positive,
with 85% of survey respondents in agreement, only 2% disagreeing and 9% neutral.
Comments at the open house focused on the need for affordability, with suggestions to keep fees low
or provide subsidies. Similarly, comments on the online survey identified the need for affordability.
Some comments on the online survey questioned the need for additional staff or a District facilitative
role, while others were in favour of marketing and coordination.
PRIORITIES
One display panel at the open house listed several potential priorities for parks and recreation in
Summerland. Participants were given 6 dot stickers each and asked to provide dots next to their top
priorities.
The result is shown in Figures E1 and E2.
The highest priority identified at the open house was to build a new multi-purpose community centre
with pool. The next highest priorities were to upgrade the arena, build a new aquatic centre, develop
a Trails Master Plan, create/protect more natural areas, keep recreation affordable, create more multi-
purpose trails, and install signage on trails.
The lowest priorities (with less than 10 dots each) were providing additional off-leash areas in off-
season or at certain times of day, improving recreation programming, creating off-road staging areas,
better maintaining parks, creating new neighbourhood parks, improving water access, creating new
playgrounds, and creating additional sports fields.
194
Figure E1: Dots allocated to priorities by open house participants

Upgrade the Arena
20 40 60 80 100 120
Number of dots allocated at open house
Figure E2: Dots allocated to priorities by open house participants
195
There was a second display panel where participants could note additional priorities or provide
comments. Many of the comments identified the need to upgrade the Rodeo Grounds, with
suggestions for upgrades and potential uses. There were several comments in favour of multi-use
trails and protecting natural areas. A couple of comments noted the need for washroom upgrades
and a couple others noting the need for dog parks.
The online survey had two questions on priorities: one with priorities for parks, trails and outdoor
recreation and a second with priorities for indoor recreation and recreation programming. Respondents
were asked to rank each as low, medium or high priority.
The rankings of parks, trails and outdoor recreation priorities are shown in Figure E3.
Survey respondents placed the highest priority on creating/protecting more natural areas, developing
a Trails Master Plan, placing signage on trails, upgrading/expanding existing parks, creating more multi-
purpose trails, better maintaining parks, and increasing water access. Feedback was mixed on creating a
new permanent, full-time off-leash dog park, with some survey respondents seeing it as a high priority
and an equal number seeing it as a low priority. Creating new playgrounds and new neighbourhood
parks and creating new or upgrading existing tennis courts were medium to low priorities for survey
Percentage of respondents
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
High priority Medium priority Low priority Don't know / don't have an option
Figure E3: Rankings of parks, trails and outdoor recreation priorities by survey respondents
196
respondents. Creating additional pickleball courts, more off-road staging areas, and additional sports
fields were lower priorities for survey respondents.
Survey respondents had the opportunity to provide additional priorities or comments. Most echoed
draft recommendations, such as washroom upgrades, upgrading Memorial Park, a new skatepark, and
a downtown gathering place. Several noted the need for an off-leash dog park. A few respondents
commented on the need for a trail network, and others noted that off-road vehicles are not compatible
with other parks and trails uses.
The rankings of indoor recreation and recreation programming priorities are shown in Figure E4.
Survey respondents placed the highest priority on keep recreation opportunities affordable and
building a new multi-purpose community centre with pool. Responses were more mixed for building
a new aquatic centre, building a new area and improving recreation programming, although more
than half of respondents identified them as a medium or high priority.
Several respondents commented on the need and benefit of a new multi-purpose community centre.
A couple of respondents noted the need to consider the affordability of the recommendations, to
prioritize or work in partnership with other organizations. Other comments provided a variety of
suggestions/needs, such as keeping programs affordable, providing recreation opportunities for teens,
providing more pickleball courts, and continuing to have non-motorized multi-use trails on Conkle
Mountain. One respondent identified a gym/fitness facility and skatepark as high priorities.
Percentage of respondents
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Upgrade the Arena
Low priority Medium priority High priority Don't know / don't have an option
Figure E4: Rankings of indoor recreation and recreation programming priorities by survey respondents
197
Survey respondents placed the highest priority on keeping recreation opportunities affordable and
building a new multi-purpose community centre with pool. Responses were more mixed for building
a new aquatic centre, building a new area and improving recreation programming, although more
than half of respondents identified them as a medium or high priority.
Several respondents commented on the need and benefit of a new multi-purpose community centre.
A couple of respondents noted the need to consider the affordability of the recommendations, to
prioritize or work in partnership with other organizations. Other comments provided a variety of
suggestions/needs, such as keeping programs affordable, providing recreation opportunities for teens,
providing more pickleball courts, and continuing to have non-motorized multi-use trails on Conkle
Mountain. One respondent identified a gym/fitness facility and skatepark as high priorities.
198
Appendix F
Environmental
Values
Summerland’s natural environment is part of the pocket desert ecosystem of the southern Interior
and has many sensitive ecosystems, including grasslands, shrub-steppe, wetlands, riparian areas,
old growth and mature forest and rugged terrain. The District of Summerland is rich in biodiversity,
providing many areas that support species at risk.
Critical Habitat for Species at Risk Act (SARA) Endangered and Threatened Species is found in
Summerland (e.g. Lewis’s Woodpecker, Great Basin Spadefoot, Tiger Salamander, Great Basin
Gophersnake, and Western Rattlesnake) and many other species at risk are known to occur in the
area. For example, much of the natural ponderosa pine and fir open forest is high quality Mule Deer
Winter Range.1 A list of known, likely species at risk is provided in Table F1, with more information
provided at the end of this Appendix.
Summerland generally supports a high diversity of species and a variety of wildlife viewing opportunities
for more common species including black bear, coyote, great-horned owls, bald eagles, and osprey.
Also, the Mountain Goat population north of town is highly unique and Mountain Goats are known
to be unusually sensitive to human disturbance.2
Summerland’s Official Community Plan (OCP) “recognizes the importance of its natural environment
and its contribution to the health of the community through the preservation of sensitive ecosystems,
their functioning, species therein and connectivity between natural areas.” The OCP specifies that
“Ecologically sensitive ecosystems such as wetlands, grasslands, riparian areas, mature and old growth
forests and rugged terrain shall continue to be preserved. It is important to maintain ecosystem
functions as well as support connections between them.”
1
Detailed mapping of both Critical Habitat and Mule Deer Winter Range is available through BC’s IMAP site http://
maps.gov.bc.ca/ess/sv/imapbc/
2
Management Plan for Mountain Goat in British Columbia http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wld/documents/recovery/
management_plans/MtGoat_MP_Final_28May2010.pdf
199
There are two designations in the OCP concerning environmental protection: riparian areas and
Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs). Riparian areas are protected under the provincial Riparian
Areas Regulations. Summerland’s OCP designates Watercourse Development Permit Areas, applicable
to all known rivers, streams, lakes and wetlands. The primary objective of this designation is to “protect
riparian areas and ensure that no harmful, alteration, disruption, or destruction of the natural features,
functions and conditions that support life processes in the riparian assessment area will occur as a
result of development.”
Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) represent sensitive ecosystems such as grasslands, shrub-
steppe, wetlands, riparian areas, old growth and mature forest and rugged terrain. The corresponding
Environmentally Sensitive Development Permit Areas contain development guidelines intended to
protect “the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity.” Figure F1 shows Environmentally
Sensitive Areas and Summerland’s parks. As can be seen from this figure, many of Summerland’s
parks lie within ESAs, and development or land alteration in these areas would be subject to the
Environmentally Sensitive Development Permit Area guidelines, with some exceptions.3
Summerland’s Official Community Plan – Goals related to the natural

environment:
• Identify, preserve, enhance, expand and protect Summerland’s ecological

biodiversity.
• Ensure new development is respectful of ecological values.
• Promote conservation stewardship of sensitive ecosystems, their functioning

and associated species.
• Protect and manage ecologically sensitive lands within, and adjacent to the
Urban Growth Area including wildlife movement corridors.
• Protect important view corridors.
3
“Actions or activities performed by Provincial or District staff or contractors to prevent, control, or reduce flooding,
erosion or other immediate threats to life or property” and “Maintenance of existing infrastructure by Provincial or
District staff or their contractors.”
200
Summerland’s Official Community Plan – Objectives related to the

natural environment:
8.2.1.1 Identify, protect, expand and restore sensitive ecosystem areas, their
living resources and connections including but not limited to wetlands, riparian
vegetation, mature trees, watercourses and native vegetation.
8.2.1.2 Secure and protect public lands along the foreshore of Okanagan Lake.
8.2.1.3 Follow and adopt recognized ecological standards and practices, and District
approved terms of reference for conducting environmentally assessments for
development within Environmentally Sensitive Areas (see Section 23.0).
8.2.1.4 Recognize the importance of protecting the environmental integrity of the

District’s water reservoirs and watersheds.
8.2.1.5 Promote environmental stewardship through municipal leadership and

ongoing education within the community; effectively communicating opportunities
to reduce, reuse, and recycle while lessening lifestyle and development impacts
on the natural environment.
8.2.1.6 Future building and development shall move towards sustainable

development best practices.
8.2.1.7 Preserve sensitive ecosystem areas, their living resources, and connections
between them in a natural condition and maintain these areas free of development
and human activity to the maximum extent possible.
Key areas for connectivity planning in Summerland include riparian areas (e.g. Prairie, Eneas and Trout
Creek), shorelines (e.g. Okanagan Lake) and terrestrial areas (e.g. connectivity between the lake and
west toward the edge of the district; north and south). This prevents isolation of wildlife populations
within BC and between the US and Canada to help avoid extinction of species. Connectivity planning
could help support restoration of these areas and support higher water quality and flood prevention.
Summerland’s parks can act as stepping stones facilitating connectivity between habitats, but land
development and use are progressively impacting connectivity and without an overarching plan, any
connectivity planned within a development will not necessarily link to surrounding areas.4
4
Alison Peatt, SOSCP Environmental Planner, providing environmental planning support services to SOSCP local
government partners. Personal communication, December 24, 2017 and February 23, 2018.
201
Figure F1: Summerland Environmentally Sensitive Areas and District of Summerland Parks
202
TABLE F1: SPECIES AT RISK IN OR NEAR SUMMERLAND
SPECIES CONSERVATION STATUS5
Mammals
American Badger (Taxidea taxus) SARA (Endangered)

Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus) SARA (Endangered)
Nuttall’s Cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttallii) SARA (Special Concern)
Spotted Bat (Euderma maculatum)- SARA (Special Concern)
Western Harvest Mouse (Reithrodontomys
SARA (Special Concern)
megalotis)
Birds
Provincial Red List and Conservation Framework

Brewer’s Sparrow (Spizella breweri breweri)
Priority 2
Canyon Wren (Catherpes mexicanus) Provincial Blue List
Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) SARA (Threatened)
Flammulated Owl (Psiloscops flammeolus) SARA (Special Concern)
Lewis’s Woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis) SARA (Threatened)
Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus anatum) SARA (Special Concern)
Western Screech Owl (Megascops kennicottii
SARA (Threatened)
macfarlanei)
White-headed Woodpecker (Leuconotopicus
SARA (Endangered)
albolarvatus)
Williamson’s Sapsucker (Sphyrapicus thyroideus
SARA (Endangered)
thyroideus)
Yellow-breasted Chat (Icteria virens) SARA (Endangered)
White-throated Swift (Aeronautes saxatalis) Provincial Blue list
5
SARA=Species at Risk Act (federal) which protects the most at risk species in Canada. COSEWIC = Committee on the
Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, an independent advisory panel to the Minister of Environment and Climate
Change Canada that meets twice a year to assess the status of wildlife species at risk of extinction. Wildlife species
that have been designated by COSEWIC may qualify for legal protection and recovery under the Species at Risk Act.
Provincial Red List = Any species or ecosystem that is at risk of being lost (extirpated, endangered or threatened);
Provincial Blue List = Any species or ecosystem that is of special concern. A glossary of terms related to species and
ecosystems at risk can be found at https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/plants-animals-ecosystems/
conservation-data-centre/explore-cdc-data/glossary-for-species-ecosystems-at-risk. Species of Management Concern
were are not considered at risk, but were highlighted as more common species that may be relevant to consider or
may have management implications for recreation/park/trails management in Summerland.
203
TABLE F1: SPECIES AT RISK IN OR NEAR SUMMERLAND
SPECIES CONSERVATION STATUS5
Reptiles
Great Basin Gophersnake (Pituophis catenifer

SARA (Threatened)
deserticola)
North American Racer (Coluber constrictor) SARA (Special Concern); COSEWIC (Endangered)
Northern Rubber Boa (Charina bottae) SARA (Special Concern)
Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta- Intermountain
SARA (Special Concern)
Rocky Mountain Population)
Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus) SARA (Threatened)
Amphibians
Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana) SARA (Threatened)

Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) SARA (Endangered)
Western Toad (Anaxyrus boreas) SARA (Special Concern)
Invertebrates
Rocky Mountain Ridged Mussel (Gonidea

SARA (Special Concern); COSEWIC (Endangered)
angulata)
Not at risk, but species of management concern
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)

Black Bear (Ursus americanus)
Kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka)
Mountain Goat (Oreamnos americanus)
Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus)
Osprey (Pandion haliaetus)
204
SPECIES AT RISK FOUND IN OR NEAR SUMMERLAND
Information provided by Allison Peatt, Environmental Planner, providing environmental planning support
services to SOSCP local government partners.
American Badger – SARA (Endangered): known to occur in Summerland District but sightings across
the southern interior are rare due to low populations. Would occur in association with areas that
have ground squirrels, or sometimes Yellow-bellied Marmots or Pocket Gophers. Most likely in natural
area parks. Burrows likely to be visible to land managers. Would have implications for development/
management if development was proposed and environmental assessment (inventory for species
at risk) indicated they were present. Would require site specific protection for the time the habitat
is occupied and possibly maintenance of habitat in future. Draft Critical Habitat is mapped but not
available. This mapping may cover areas of Summerland District, when it is released
Brewer’s Sparrow (Spizella breweri breweri) – Provincial Red List and Conservation Framework Priority
2. Province does not record nesting occurrences in Summerland, although it is found further south.
Nesting in Summerland is possible but unlikely. Would have implications for development/management
if development was proposed and environmental assessment (inventory for species at risk) indicated
this species was nesting in a park, on a city property or immediately adjacent.
Canyon Wren (Catherpes mexicanus) – Provincial Blue List; Cliffs, habitat is steep-sided canyons,
rocky outcrops and boulder piles; nests on canyon walls and may also be associated with or nest
around buildings; local populations can fluctuate widely and decline severely in response to severe
winters; Would have implications for development/management if development was proposed and
environmental assessment (inventory for species at risk) indicated this species was present. Potential
impacts associated with rock climbing, and land use on steep slopes
Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) – SARA (Threatened): This bird nests on the ground and thus is
particularly vulnerable to disturbance by unleased pets, off trail trampling by people and development
activities that result in clearing or ground disturbance. It is also highly vulnerable to vehicle collisions,
particularly at dusk. Another once common bird species that has shown rapid declines, this species is
also an important consumer of insects and of interest to wildlife viewers both because of the noises
it makes in flight, the manoverability of its flying (catching insects on the wing) and its tendency to be
active and highly visible at dawn and dusk. Would have implications for development/management
if development was proposed and environmental assessment (inventory for species at risk) indicated
this species was present.
Flammulated Owl (Psiloscops flammeolus) – SARA (Special Concern): Associated with Ponderosa
Pine forests; Known to occur in Summerland District; Would have implications for development/
management if development was proposed and environmental assessment (inventory for species at
risk) indicated this species was present. Management would require protection of nest sites, a supply
of suitable nest trees and associated forest understory. This species would only be found in natural
area parks.
205
Great Basin Gophersnake (Pituophis catenifer deserticola)6 - SARA (Threatened): Proposed Critical
Habitat located in Summerland District
Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana)- SARA (Threatened): Proposed Critical Habitat located in
Summerland District. Habitat is wetlands and adjacent uplands where these toads dig burrows. Would
have implications for development/management if development was proposed and environmental
assessment (inventory for species at risk) indicated they were present.
Lewis’s Woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis) –SARA7 (Threatened): Proposed Critical Habitat located in
Summerland District and many known locations including historical wintering habitat and nesting sites
(e.g. Woodbridge Nature Preserve)
Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus) – SARA (Endangered): These remain common and are known
to occur in Summerland District. They are associated with buildings and wildlife trees and forage near
wetlands, streams and lake shorelines. They are very important as an “ecosystem service” helping with
insect management by consuming large number of mosquitos, midges, hoppers and other insects.
White nose Syndrome (a fungal disease introduced from Europe by cavers) is decimating bats across
Canada causing massive reductions (i.e. more than 99% mortality in areas where it has spread). This
has severe potential for disruptions of ecosystems and impacts to people. Although white nose has
not yet reaching BC, it has been found in Washington State. An inventory to determine which parks are
used by this species (or even bats in general) would be straight forward to complete, using auditory
bat detectors. Management advice for occupied parks could be provided by a bat expert (QEP) and
policy direction for management of bats in park or other district buildings is highly desirable, as the
loss of this species has the potential for impacts to human health and costs of mosquito control.
North American Racer (Coluber constrictor) - SARA (Special Concern); COSEWIC (Endangered):
known to occur in Summerland; habitat is dry grassland; species not well studied; similar concerns
to rattlesnakes re dens and impacts associated with roads and trails (being run over by vehicles and
bikes; persecuted by people)
Northern Rubber Boa (Charina bottae) – SARA (Special Concern): known to occur in Summerland;
strong habitat association with Coarse woody debris (down and dead wood); secretive and nocturnal,
they are difficult to find but may be present in natural area parks. Would have implications for
development/management if development was proposed and environmental assessment (inventory
for species at risk) indicated they were present.
Nuttall’s Cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttallii) – SARA (Special Concern): known to occur in Summerland;
habitat is grassland, shrub-steppe, rocky, streamside habitats; Would have implications for
6
Recovery plan for this species defines Critical Habitat for three species together (i.e. Western Rattlesnake, Great Basin
Gophersnake and Desert Nightsnake (Hypsiglena chlorophaea). The Desert Nightsnake is not known to occur north of
Penticton but Critical Habitat is declared in the Summerland area to protect all three species.
7
SARA=Species at Risk Act (federal) which protects the most at risk species in Canada
206
Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta- Intermountain Rocky Mountain Population) – SARA (Special
Concerns): known to occur in Summerland; associated with wetlands only; Would have implications for
Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus anatum): SARA (Special Concern): Known to occur in the area
around Summerland. Nests are protected under provincial and federal legislation but rare. Would
assessment (inventory for species at risk) indicated they were present.
Rocky Mountain Ridged Mussel (Gonidea angulata) – SARA (Special Concern) and COSEWIC
(Endangered): This species is known to occur at shallow depths in Okanagan Lake, adjacent to
Summerland district. These sites would affect beach/riparian management and appropriate recreation
uses. Locations are mapped in the same map as Kokanee. See http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/okanagan/
esd/ollp/ollp.html for more information.
Spotted Bat (Euderma maculatum)- SARA (Special Concern): known to occur in Summerland District
(spring and summer, migrating to warmer areas when temperatures are cooler); solitary, nocturnal
bat with a diet that mainly consists of moths; interesting from a wildlife viewing perspective as their
ecolocation calls can be heard. This bat is larger than some of the more common species and may be
drawn to lights for hunting its prey. Its biology is not well known, but likely it roosts in crevices in rocks
(but may also roost in buildings or caves). Would have implications for development/management if
development was proposed and environmental assessment (inventory for species at risk) indicated
they were present. Concerns for this species would include white-nose syndrome, rock climbing in
occupied habitat, noise and light pollution.
Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) – SARA (Endangered): Proposed Critical Habitat located
in Summerland District; habitat is wetlands and surrounding upland areas, including corridors that
connect wetlands. Would have implications for development/management if development was
proposed and environmental assessment (inventory for species at risk) indicated they were present.
Western Harvest Mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis) – SARA (Special Concern); there are records
in Summerland District. Would have implications for development/management if development was
Likely to be associated with Grassland-Shrub-Steppe habitats (natural areas), but may also use old
fields, and edge habitat. Unlikely in highly modified/developed areas.
Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus)8 - SARA (Threatened): Proposed Critical Habitat located in
Summerland District; habitat is grassland, shrub-steppe, open forest and riparian/wetland areas in
8
Recovery plan for this species defines Critical Habitat for three species together (i.e. Western Rattlesnake, Great Basin
Gophersnake and Desert Nightsnake (Hypsiglena chlorophaea). The Desert Nightsnake is not known to occur north of
Penticton but Critical Habitat is declared in the Summerland area to protect all three species.
207
the bunchgrass, ponderosa pine and interior douglas fir biogeoclimatic zones (i.e. lower elevations).
The most important habitat element to protect would be dens where snakes overwinter. Would
assessment (inventory for species at risk) indicated snakes were present, particularly if dens were
present. Dens are more likely in natural areas. Known den locations are protected as “sensitive
information” because of the risk of persecution. Qualified professionals can access this known
information to assist with Park Planning.
Western Screech Owl (Megascops kennicottii macfarlanei) -SARA (Threatened): Known to nest in
Summerland. Would have implications for development/management if development was proposed
and environmental assessment (inventory for species at risk) the species was present. Main
management concern would be management for a supply of wildlife trees of sufficient size to be
suitable for nesting (Aspen and Black Cottonwood) and protection of occupied nest trees.
White-headed Woodpecker (Leuconotopicus albolarvatus)- SARA (Endangered); there is a historical

occurrence, but these are not known to occur in the area recently.
Williamson’s Sapsucker (Sphyrapicus thyroideus thyroideus) – SARA (Endangered): Critical Habitat is

mapped for Okanagan but does not occur within Summerland District. They have been seen in the
district, but this species is unlikely to be of concern to Parks Management, unless a nest is found in
the area (unlikely).
Yellow-breasted Chat (Icteria virens) – SARA (Endangered): Critical Habitat is mapped for Okanagan
but does not occur within Summerland District. They have been seen in the district, but this species
is unlikely to be of concern to Parks Management, unless a nest is found in the area (unlikely).
White-throated Swift (Aeronautes saxatalis) – Provincial Blue list: Nests in rock crevices in cliffs and
canyons, this species is known to occur in Summerland District(spring and summer, migrating to
warmer areas when temperatures are cooler). Sometimes nests in buildings, and on cliffs; there are
concerns about this species declining and being vulnerable to development and recreation impacts
on steep ground habitat. Would have implications for development/management if development was
Western Toad (Anaxyrus boreas) - SARA (Special Concern); this species is relatively abundant but
vulnerable because of migrations of young toadlets that occurs in some places in large numbers. They
are particularly vulnerable to roads constructed or used near wetlands that they occupy and are highly
likely to be found in Summerland District wetlands. This species could be of interest for education and
wildlife viewing and generic direction provided by a QEP or environmental planner, for parks containing
habitat for Western Toad would likely provide sufficient direction to manage this species.
208
NOT AT RISK, BUT SPECIES OF MANAGEMENT CONCERN
Black Bear (Ursus americanus)-one of the largest concentrations of black bear in the Okanagan due
to fruit production in the area; management significance due to potential for human and bear safety
risks. RDOS has a Bear Conflict Management Plan which provides direction for managing bear-human
conflict.9
Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus) – Mule Deer were once highly abundant in BC and appear to be
declining, despite urban deer issues which are caused by White-tail and Mule Deer. There are areas of
high capability winter range which are critical to survival of Mule Deer and various of the Summerland
natural areas parks like Giants Head and areas currently owned by Summerland (e.g. Prairie Valley lands;
areas adjacent to Old College Property) provide high quality winter range. Management to maintain
areas of snow interception cover are important considerations when designing park management
plans or fire risk/interface “firesmart” plans.
Mountain Goat (Oreamnos americanus) – A prominent population of Mountain Goats are easily
viewed from the highway and are a sensitive species to recreation and other disturbance by people.
Although various people have speculated that this population is uniquely unsusceptible to disturbance,
this is speculation not based on research, whereas research documents in detail on many populations
that Mountain Goats are highly sensitive to disturbance, although some population have adapted to
highway road noise. The district may wish to address this unique resource in parks and recreation
planning, as without active planning, the population is likely to be lost.
Kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) – Areas have been designated on Okanagan Lake to identify and
protect shore spawning areas for Kokanee. Some of these are located in Summerland. These would
affect beach/riparian management and appropriate recreation uses on the sites shown on the map.
See http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/okanagan/esd/ollp/ollp.html for more information.
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) – Nest trees are protected under multiple provincial and federal
laws. Management of these trees will require QEP advice and compliance with this legislation. These
also can provide valuable wildlife viewing opportunities for locals and visitors. Interpretation around
fishing behaviour would also be possible, as the miles of lake shoreline and open vistas in the Okanagan
provide much enjoyment and opportunities to learn about large “raptor” species.
Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) – Same comments as for Bald Eagle (see above).
9
This plan was authored by Alison Peatt.
209
Appendix G
Summerland’s
Community
Climate Action Plan
Summerland has a Climate Action Plan (2011), which has seven goals, several of which are relevant
to parks, trails and recreation. The relevant goals and actions relevant include:
Goal 2: Improve transportation efficiency.
• Improve pedestrian and cycling infrastructure. This includes more multi-use trails that are
connected to a trail network. All collector road reconstruction should consider the inclusion of
bicycle lanes and sidewalks.
• Provide information on transportation alternatives (electric assist bicycles) and communicate

the lifestyle and financial benefits of public transit and active transportation.
• Investigate the construction of a multi-use trail between Lower Town and Trout Creek.
Goal 4: Identify and support effective greenhouse gas reduction initiatives.
• Consider disseminating recycling/waste bins throughout the community. These bins separate
garbage and recycling and are placed in public areas like downtown, parks, arenas, etc.
Goal 5: Promote energy conservation and dissemination of renewable energy technologies.
• Consider new technologies and/or partnerships that reduce peak energy demand, generate
renewable energy, or reduce energy consumption.
210
Goal 6: Maintain and enhance the urban ecosystem.
• Support Municipally owned vacant lots to be used for community gardens.
• Review policy and regulations to ensure parking lots are landscaped to provide shade and
permeability.
• Consider adding street trees as a requirement in the Subdivision and Development Bylaw.
• Consider preparing a Tree Preservation Bylaw.
Goal 7: Demonstrate Municipal leadership.
• Consider mapping Summerland's urban forest and identify tree planting locations in the municipality.
• All newly constructed, municipally owned and operated buildings, shall be at least 25 percent more
energy efficient than those built to Provincial building codes.
• Promote the ideas of "Carbon-neutral Vacations" or "Eco-Tourism" in Summerland through the

Chamber of Commerce.
• Support initiatives that improve air quality such as increasing our urban forest, lowering transportation
emissions and improving and reducing all wood burning practices.
211
212
Appendix H
Summerland's
Parks
CITY PARKS
Dale Meadows Park
Dale Meadows Park is a sports-oriented park located near the centre of town, beside Giant’s Head
Elementary School. It is used extensively for team sports as well as special events like dog shows.
Dale Meadows Park has 5 ball diamonds, 3 soccer fields, a washroom facility, a concession stand, 1.2
km perimeter walking path, playground, picnic tables, benches and bleachers as well as material and
equipment storage for parks operations.
The baseball fields are used by Slo-pitch, softball and girls fastball league play and several tournaments,
including Action Fest. The soccer fields used by youth and senior men’s soccer leagues. There does
not appear to be a need for additional fields at this time: sports field users did not identify the need
for additional fields and Summerland is above the median and average of similar BC communities for
sports field provision (see section 4.3.2). However, the parking lots and washrooms are not sufficient
when all fields are in use. Sports field users would like a new clubhouse or changing rooms and an
upgrade to the existing washrooms. Additional requests include, safety netting for baseball diamonds
4 and 5 and resurfacing of the perimeter track.
Sports field users identified a number of maintenance issues with the fields. Soccer field users noted
that the grass is too long, that sprinkler heads are too high and there are divots in the field. Staff noted
that there is a ditch in middle of fields 2 and 3. Staff advise that the turf could be better maintained
with a top-dresser. Only one field has lights, but this meets current requirements for evening play.
Baseball field users noted that the diamonds are very hard and rough and that fields are dipped and
flood easily when it rains. They would like more protection between fields 2 and 3 above the bleachers,
more shaded areas, better enclosure of dugouts to prevent wild balls from entering and drop-ins at
60 feet. Summerland Minor Fastball would like an indoor facility to use for clinics and indoor training;
currently they use Giant’s Head Elementary or the Harold Simpson Youth Centre.
213
Field maintenance and preparation for games and tournaments requires staff time, and advance
notice is needed to ensure staff have sufficient time to prepare the fields. Similarly, advance notice
of cancellation of games or tournaments will ensure that staff time is not used to prepare fields that
are no longer needed. The District should determine how much advance notice is needed for booking
fields and for cancelling bookings and make this information available to sports field users and on the
District website and relevant publications.
A meeting between District staff and sports field users in the spring of each year would be helpful for
reminding sports field users of required advance notice in bookings as well as how they can contribute
to field maintenance, such as watering ball diamonds.
Living Memorial Baseball Park
Living Memorial Baseball Park has 3 ball diamonds, bleachers, benches, and a washroom facility. It is
used by minor baseball, who use all 3 diamonds every day in April, May, and June. There is sometimes
peewee and bantam league play from July to mid-September as well. The diamonds are also used
during Action Fest and for other tournaments that need more than the 5 fields at Dale Meadows Park.
Memorial Park
Memorial Park is located within the downtown core. It is a popular park and venue for community
events including Action Fest and Canada Day celebrations. The Tuesday Farmer’s Market is located
adjacent to Memorial Park on Kelly Avenue. The park features a cenotaph, bandshell, and playground,
with large grassy areas, mature shade trees, picnic tables and benches, and washrooms. A horseshoe
pitch and clubhouse is located at the edge of the park. The playground is in need of replacement,
which is planned and budgeted for 2018. In addition, the District Recreation department proposes
installing outdoor fitness equipment adjacent to the playground.
A common comment during engagement for this master plan is that Memorial Park needs an upgrade
– it is a beautiful park, but it could be made better. The bandshell roof needs to be replaced and it
would be good to limit access to the stage to deter camping. The washrooms need upgrading and
should be winterized so that they can be used year-round.
COMMUNITY PARKS
Gordon Beggs Rotary Beach Park
Gordon Beggs Rotary Beach Park is popular with residents and visitors, but as it is a fairly small park
with limited parking, it can be crowded in the summer months. The park features a fine sandy beach,
an enclosed swimming area, the “F+I” docks, floating docks, washroom facilities, shade trees, picnic
tables and park benches. The historic Kiwanis Pier is located in this park and is a popular location for
fishing, yoga and tai chai. It has community significance: graduating high school students often take
photos with their family and friends on the Kiwanis Pier, which is also a popular location for wedding
214
photos, and there is a tradition for Summerland children to take their first jump off Kiwanis Pier into
Lake Okanagan. The pier is in need of remediation, and funds have been allocated for this purpose in
the District’s capital budget.
Like Summerland’s other beachfront parks, Rotary Beach was flooded in the summer of 2017 and
requires remediation of the resulting flood damage. There is damage to the foreshore path and the
F+I docks need to be replaced. When undertaking the remediation, the District should explore and
pursue opportunities to enhance the ecological integrity of the riparian zone, improve accessibility
and increase resilience to possible future flooding.
The washrooms in Rotary Beach Park need upgrading. Stakeholders and community members would
like to see more play equipment like slides or a Wibit and sun shelter (such as pergolas) where picnic
tables are along walkway. Other potential improvements include improved bike lane access and a long
distance sanctioned swim lane from Peach Orchard Beach Park to Rotary Beach Park.
Peach Orchard Beach Park
Peach Orchard Beach Park is located just north of Rotary Beach along Okanagan Lake. It is a popular
park and venue for many community festivals and special events. It features a beach, large grassy areas,
a volleyball court, a playground, walkway, picnic tables and benches, washrooms, a boat launch and
a floating dock. Spirit Square is located in this park, which is a large covered gazebo with stage area.
There are also 6 interpretive historic signs, 8 picnic tables, and operating sundial sculpture.
Peach Orchard Beach Park also has the Summerland Millennium Spray Park, which was built in 2000
and contains 15 pieces of apparatus including water cannons and 25 ground sprays. The Spray Park is
open daily from May until September and contains both timer and motion sensors for water efficient
operation.
A boat launch and parking lot is located at the north end of the park. The parking lot is too small for
vehicles with trailers and there are not enough parking spots. There may be potential to expand the
parking lot into the grassy area at the northern end of Peach Orchard Beach Park, and the District
should explore the costs, benefits and feasibility of doing so.
Peach Orchard Beach was also flooded during summer 2017 and remediation is required to the
foreshore path. When undertaking the remediation, the District should explore and pursue
opportunities to enhance the ecological integrity of the riparian zone, improve accessibility and
increase resilience to possible future flooding.
The washrooms at Peach Orchard Beach Park should be upgraded, including to meet accessibility
standards, and should be winterized for year-round use. The playground also needs to be replaced,
which is planned and budgeted for in 2018. The open lawn area has poor drainage and is seasonally
wet, which limits its use. There is also a significant Canada Goose droppings problem in the park.
215
The District should undertake concept planning for Peach Orchard Beach Park to address the issues
that need attention and ensure that optimal use is made of this key community park.
Dog Beach
Dog beach is located at the north end of Peach Orchard Beach Park. It is the only permanent off-leash
dog park in Summerland. The Summerland Dog Owners’ Association has requested that Dog Beach
be made accessible for people with mobility challenges. The District should consider including this
in the capital budget for the next 1-3 years, provided that required construction is permissible in the
riparian zone and the cost is reasonable and feasible for the District to incur.
Powell Beach Park
Powell Beach Park is located in the Trout Creek area of Summerland. It has a sandy beach as well as a
softball field, tennis courts, washroom facilities, shade trees, picnic tables and park benches. Flooding
in summer 2017 damaged the foreshore path, which will need remediation/replacement. The District
is undertaking management planning for this park, which is expected to be completed by the end of
2018.
NEIGHBOURHOOD PARKS
Summerland has several small neighbourhood parks, including Beaver Street Park, Butler Street,
Crescent Beach and Kinsmen Park, located along the lakeshore, and Julia Street Park and Turner Street
Park located in the residential neighbourhood north of downtown. These parks all have landscaping
(grass and trees) and benches and the Kinsmen and Julia Street parks have playgrounds. In addition,
Summerland has three undeveloped neighbourhood parks: Deer Ridge Park, Dunham Park and Old
Hospital-MacDonald Place.
NATURAL AREAS
Summerland has several natural areas, including Giant’s Head, Conkle Mountain, the Adams Street Bird
Sanctuary; and the newly designated Woodbridge Nature Reserve. Conservation of their ecological
values is the primary purpose of these natural areas, but they also have hiking, cycling, and equestrian
trails. An ongoing goal for the District will be to ensure that recreation uses are compatible with
ecological conservation, particularly for sensitive or significant ecosystems and habitat for species at
risk.
In addition to Summerland’s extensive natural areas such as Giant’s Head Mountain and Conkle
Mountain, Summerland’s other parks contain natural features and contribute to ecological integrity
of the region. In light of this, it is recommended that the District develop a parks natural features/areas
management strategy, to ensure that natural features in parks are protected and enhanced over time.
216
Giant’s Head Mountain Park
Giant’s Head Mountain is one of Summerland’s most familiar landmarks and can be seen from every
location within the community. A road leads up the mountain, ending at a parking lot, picnic area and
washroom facilities. From there, walking trails lead to the summit, which is 845m above sea level and
provides 360° views. A Trails Redevelopment Plan is currently under way for Giant’s Head Mountain.
Conkle Mountain Park
Conkle Mountain Park borders the Rodeo Grounds and is backed by crown land behind the mountain
itself. A portion of the Trans Canada Trail winds its way through Conkle Mountain Park and there are
other multi-use trails that are popular with hikers, equestrians, cyclists, and off-leash dog walkers.
Conkle Mountain Park was designated and zoned as parkland and dedicated as a park by District
Council in 2016.
The community values Conkle Mountain Park and the outdoor recreation opportunities it provides.
During engagement for this master plan, community members expressed their desire that the trails
on Conkle Mountain continue to be multi-use.
District Council passed a resolution at the regular Council meeting on November 14, 2016
THAT staff be directed to not enforce sections 3(d) and 3(l) of the Parks Regulation Bylaw 95-013
in Conkle Mountain Park in relation to horseback riding, dog walking, and bicycle riding, as these
activities are an historically accepted use of the property;
AND THAT staff be directed, in conjunction with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the
Trails Master Plan, to prepare an update of the Parks Regulation Bylaw 95-013 for Council's
consideration.
In order to ensure that the environmental values of Conkle Mountain Park are preserved and to provide
for a variety of passive recreation uses and minimize conflict among recreation users, the District
should undertake master planning for Conkle Mountain Park. Where possible, current recreation uses
should be permitted to continue.
This may be eligible as an Avoided Forest Conversion project (see section 3.4.3).
Adams Street Bird Sanctuary
The Adams Street Bird Sanctuary, located across from Peach Orchard Campground, is a natural area
with a walkway. It was created with major support from Summerland Rotary. Trees were planted as a
part of Earth Day celebrations in 2017 and 2018. Needs were not identified for this park during master
plan development.
217
Woodbridge Nature Preserve
In 2016, the 1.0 hectare Woodbridge Nature Preserve was created through subdivision dedication. The
primary purpose of this park is to preserve environmental values on the property, particularly Lewis’s
Woodpecker habitat. To preserve this habitat, and because Woodbridge is intended for management
to maintain Cottonwoods which may create a falling limb, branch and tree bole hazard, recreation
activity in this park should be limited to bird and wildlife viewing from the park edge.
This may be eligible as an Avoided Forest Conversion project (see section 3.4.3).
Other Natural Areas
Other natural areas in Summerland include Cartwright Mountain and the “Horse Beach” at 16997
Lakeshore Drive.
SPECIAL PURPOSE PARKS
Peach Orchard Campground
Peach Orchard Campground is a municipal campground located near Peach Orchard Beach Park. It has
123 campsites for RV's and tenting; the RV sites have power and water services. The campground is
open from May 15- September 15 and is operated by a contractor. There are also two public pickleball
and one public combined pickleball/tennis court, washrooms/showers, and a small playground. The
playground needs to be replaced, which is planned for 2018.
The campground operator (contractor) has identified that upgrades to the washrooms/showers are
needed, including for accessibility, and that the building needs a new roof. She also identified a need
for more powered sites and . would like to see more and better promotion of the campground.
According to the Chamber of Commerce, there is a dire need for more campsites. It is not recommended
that the District change the use of this park from a campground. However, the District should continue
to explore possibilities to expand community use during the off-season, for instance as an off-leash
dog park.
Rodeo Grounds
The Rodeo Grounds is a rustic park located outside of town. It has an outdoor grandstand and riding
ring, several stalls or pens for animals, clubhouse, washrooms with showers, and a building that
includes a seasonal concession. The TransCanada trailhead is located in this park, and it is used as a
staging area for the Kettle Valley Railway.
218
The Rodeo Grounds is a popular venue for events, including an annual bluegrass festival, camping for
longboard competitors, and family events. People camp informally – there are no designated campsites
or water or power hookups. Water is limited, with 1 shallow domestic well and 2 emergency wells,
and there was a potable water quality concern in 2017.
Currently, when people book the Rodeo Grounds, they have the option to reserve the entire site.
Equestrian users would like be able to access to riding ring when Rodeo Grounds is booked by someone
else, and suggest that changes to usage guidelines and creating campsites at the back of the property
would make this feasible. Other trail stakeholders agreed that new campsites might be beneficial, and
the District should explore the costs, benefits and feasibility of this.
Equestrian users identify a covered multipurpose arena as long term priority for the Rodeo Grounds.
They also identify several maintenance needs and upgrades including the footing in the arena, the
concession stand, clubhouse, washrooms and landscaping around the clubhouse area. They suggest
that the announcer’s stand should be dismantled. They would like additional stabling facilities, an
equine camping area with campsite and paddock as one unit, and a covered entertainment.
During engagement for this master plan, the Rodeo Grounds was frequently identified as a park that
needs attention. In 2008, a study was done to explore potential development and use of the Rodeo
Grounds. It discussed possible new amenities that community members identified for the Rodeo
Grounds, including indoor riding arena, tennis/racquet facility as a new location for the Lakeshore
Racquets Club, and a community centre. The consultant’s opinion was that “construction and operation
of a permanent riding facility would require a feasibility study” and that an indoor riding, tennis facility
or community centre would be problematic because the Rodeo Grounds is too far from town and they
would be too expensive to build and operate. The consultant noted that “depending on the amount
of use that the site will likely experience in future years, it will be necessary to take an in-depth look
at existing and future service requirements, and their costs.”
The Rodeo Grounds is a valuable asset for Summerland. Currently and in the short term, it is
providing important functions and is meeting the needs of the community without undue expenses.
In concurrence with the 2008 study, it is recommended that in the long term the District should
undertake a master planning process for the Rodeo Grounds to ensure that optimal use is made of
this park. At that time, the District may consider seeking expressions of interests from the business
community for the long term development and operation of outdoor/ indoor sports and special events
facilities. Possible long term uses could include a campground, expanded outdoor events centre, and
indoor recreation facilities.
Priest Camp Historic Park
Priest Camp Historic Park, located at Garnet Valley Dam, is a picnic site and the trailhead for the Brigade
Trail. There are picnic tables and a rustic washroom facility at the site. Needs were not identified for
this park during master plan development.
219
DOWNTOWN GATHERING PLACE
Stakeholders including the Chamber of Commerce and youth noted that there are few public gathering
spaces in the downtown area. This is also recognized in the Downtown Strategic Plan in Summerland’s
Official Community Plan as well as in the Cultural Plan. The Downtown Strategic Plan calls for
establishing “an active and safe focal point and central meeting place for Downtown Summerland”
and “providing increased outdoor seating opportunities within the Downtown core”. There is an action
item to “Identify (and if necessary acquire) lands within the Downtown (along Main Street or with the
Wharton Street Redevelopment/adjacent to Memorial Park) for a community focal point/gathering
place (this may include relocation of the cenotaph, seating, water feature, public art).”
The Downtown Strategic Plan also recommends to “consider enhancing the open areas between
existing parking lots and Main Street as to be more attractive and functional to the street through
public seating areas, landscaping, shade trees and/or public art” and working with community facilities
and churches to explore opportunities “to enhance their open spaces for safe, informal community
use.”
220
Appendix I
Places for Dogs
PRINCIPLES
Provision of amenities for dogs, including off-leash dog parks, should be guided by planning principles.
Suggested principles for Summerland:
• Walking and exercising dogs is recognized as a beneficial recreation activity that warrants
provision of recreation infrastructure by the District of Summerland.
• Designation of areas within parks where dogs are permitted, on- or off-leash, will be guided by:
• The need to preserve important ecological values: Dogs should not be permitted in areas
where their presence might harm valuable ecosystems, plants or animals.
• The need to preserve historic and cultural features: Dogs should not be permitted in areas
where they could harm historical or cultural features.
• The need to provide places for all people to recreate: There must be opportunities for people
to recreate without interacting with dogs.
• The District should endeavour to provide spaces for dogs within walking distance of all
residents.
• The District should endeavour to provide sufficient fenced and dedicated space for residents
and visitors to exercise their dogs. Where feasible, there should be different kinds of spaces, to
accommodate different kinds of play (e.g., walking, running and chasing balls, socializing with
other dogs, swimming).
221
• Spaces for dogs will be designed according to best practices, ensuring the health and safety of
dogs, people, and wildlife.
• Options for spaces for dogs include:
–– Permanent, enclosed off-leash areas that are designated exclusively as dog parks.
–– Spaces that are designated for use by off-leash dogs during certain times of the year, on
certain days of the week and/or at certain times of day. These may or may not be enclosed.
–– Spaces that are designated for use by on-leash dogs.
• Spaces for dogs should not be located in or near playgrounds, sports fields, swimming beaches,
or other areas where there is active recreation, especially involving children.
• Off-leash spaces for dogs should be of sufficient size to permit dogs to run freely. Smaller
enclosed additional spaces may be provided for small dogs.
• Garbage cans and dog waste bags should be available in all spaces for dogs. Where possible,
water fountains for people and dogs, shade, benches and parking should be also be provided.
• The District will provide clear and easily accessible information about the location of spaces for
dogs, the rules that govern use of those spaces, and the rules applying to dogs in Summerland
more generally. This could include the District’s website, the Recreation program guide, tourist
publications, and signs at dog parks.
SUMMERLAND DOG OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL
In November, 2016, the Summerland Dog Owners’ Association submitted a proposal to Council
requesting an additional permanent, year-round dog off-leash area; an extension to the period when
dogs are permitted off-leash in Peach Orchard Beach Park and similar off-season access in Powell Beach
Park; accessibility improvements at Dog Beach; 2 garbage cans and a bag dispenser at Cartwright Trail;
and to not change zoning on Conkle Mountain for commercial use. Accompanying the proposal was
a letter of support with 300 signatures. District staff prepared a response to the SDOA proposal, and
Council passed a resolution at the December 12, 2016 Council meeting:
THAT consideration of amenities for various activities in District of Summerland parks, including
those specified in the Summerland Dog Owners Association proposal dated November 14, 2016,
be included as part of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Trails Master Plan public process.
222
New permanent fenced off-leash dog park
The SDOA proposal included two suggested possible sites for a fenced fulltime off-leash dog park in
Summerland: the grassy area in Peach Orchard Park that is currently used for off-leash dogs in the
off-season and one of the ball diamonds in Living Memorial Park. Preliminary investigation suggests
that neither site is completely suitable, for the reasons discussed below.
Peach Orchard Beach Park
During the summer months, the grassy area is used for Wednesdays on the Water, informal socializing
(e.g., playing frisbee, picnics) and children’s races during the Triathlon. Drainage this area is poor and
tree roots are pervasive, which may have implications for turf maintenance. Additionally, the fencing
required for the off-leash dog park would reduce the aesthetic appeal of park and the uninterrupted
view of Lake Okanagan.
Living Memorial Park ball diamond
All of the diamonds are used by Summerland Minor Baseball from April through June, and sometimes
in July and August as well. Conversion to an off-leash dog area would mean a net reduction in sport
amenities and amenities for youth.
Living Memorial Park was dedicated in 1948 by the Memorial Parks Committee and is included in
Summerland’s “Heritage Buildings Inventory 2014”. The park is “deemed ‘red flagged’. This means
that when a building permit is issued for these structures (demolition, renovation) the District and
the Heritage Advisory Commission can attempt to request that the owners preserve the heritage
elements of the structure.”
There may be other locations in Summerland that are suitable for a permanent, fenced off-leash dog
park, such as behind the backfield in Living Memorial Park, behind the backfield in Dale Meadows Park
near Giant’s Head Elementary School, easements beside Dale Meadows Park in adjacent properties
to the east, and the large gravel pit area (District snow dumping ground) on Peach Orchard (north
side of road close to highway). The District should explore whether these, or other locations, would
be suitable for dog off-leash areas.
Extended off-leash access during off-season
The SDOA proposal also requests an extension to the period during which Peach Orchard Beach Park is
accessible for off-leash dogs, from September 1 to June 1 of each year (only requested if a fenced dog
park is not in place). Staff indicate that this would not be compatible with use of the park for school
trips in May and use of the waterpark, which is turned on in May.
Similarly the SDOA proposal requests that Powell Beach Park be accessible for off-leash dogs from
September 1 to June 1 of each year. Currently, off-leash dogs are not permitted in Powell Beach Park.
223
Staff indicate that off-leash dog use would not be compatible with use of the park by softball players,
which begins in April. District staff should monitor use of Powell Beach Park over the winter of 2018-
2019 to determine whether there is an area of the park that is suitable for off-leash dog use, where
there would be no obvious conflicts between off-leash dogs and other users; if such an area can be
identified, the District should implement a 2-year trial permitting off-leash dog use in a designated
portion of Powell Beach Park, from October 1 to April 30.
Other parks that could potentially be used for seasonal dog off-leash areas include Peach Orchard
Campground and the Rodeo Grounds.
Dog Beach accessibility
The SDOA proposal requests that Dog Beach be made accessible for wheelchair users. The staff report
to Council notes that this “would potentially increase use of an existing amenity in a positive way for
many users, but it is not yet known if it is feasible or what the costs might be.” The report notes that
there may be provincial restrictions on further construction within a riparian area and there could
be significant construction costs. Staff recommend that the SDOA’s request be investigated following
completion of the Parks and Recreation Masterplan and, if this request is feasible, that a report be
provided to Council.
Garbage cans and bags at Cartwright
The SDOA proposal requests that the District place two garbage cans and a poop bag dispenser at
Cartwright Trail. The staff report to Council notes that this “is potentially problematic due to the fact
that some parts of the trail network used by the public run through private property. Until the entire
system of trail networks in the District are assessed as part of the Parks and Recreation Masterplan and
Trails Master Plan, making any changes that encourage use of one trails over another for specific types
of uses would be premature and potentially conflict with the long-term plans that are developed.”
Conkle Mountain zoning
Conkle Mountain is zoned Parks and Recreation Zone PR1 and Council adopted a resolution at the
November 14, 2016 Regular Meeting “THAT staff be directed to not enforce sections 3(d) and 3(l) of the
Parks Regulation Bylaw 95-013 in Conkle Mountain Park in relation to horseback riding, dog walking,
and bicycle riding, as these activities are an historically accepted use of the property.”
224
Appendix J
Summerland's Most
Prominent Trails
Summerland’s most prominent trails include the Brigade Trail, Summerland Centennial Trail,
Summerland Rotary Trail Lakeshore Loop, TransCanada Trail, Landry Trail, which are discussed below.
Other important trails include the Trout Creek dike, Test of humanity bike trails, and trails on Giants
Head and Conkle Mountains.
The Brigade Trail Linear Park
The Brigade Trail Linear Park is a section of the original Okanagan brigade Trail linking to one of the
frequently mentioned encampment sites, Priest Camp. The Brigade Trail served as a part of the Cariboo
Gold Rush Trail and later as the original automobile route to Peachland before the lakeshore road
and Highway 97 were built. The Brigade Trail is 4.1 km long and open from May through October. The
trailhead is at the Garnett Valley Dam (Priest Camp Historic Park), where there is also a picnic area
and washroom.
Summerland Centennial Trail
The Centennial Trail explores the area that was the first townsite of Summerland. The 4.5 km trail
travels along roads, through a forested area along Aeneas Creek, along dry grassy hillsides, clay bluffs
and a series of park pathways past Rotary Beach Park and Peach Orchard Beach Park. A viewpoint has
interpretative signage about the history of the area and provides panoramic views of Okanagan Lake
and the original lakeside location of Summerland. Many sections are along local roadways.
Summerland Rotary Trail Lakeshore Loop
The 6 km Summerland Rotary Trail Lakeshore Loop starts at Peach Orchard Beach Park then heads
north along Lakeshore Road to Crescent Beach before turning west through orchards and vineyards,
then back toward the lakeshore past Peach Orchard Campground and the Adams Street Bird Sanctuary.
Many sections are along local roadways.
225
Trans Canada Trail
The Summerland portion of the Trans Canada Trail features two bridges and spans 61 kilometers
between Summerland and Osprey Lake. Spanning the Trout Creek Canyon is the 73m/240ft high
Trout Creek Bridge which was the highest bridge span constructed on the Kettle Valley Railway. At the
north end of the bridge there is a rest area and good vantage points for taking photos. At the south
end of the bridge is the Summerland Ornamental Gardens. The trail follows the old flume line along
Conkle Mountain to the Summerland Rodeo Grounds then continues on beside the railway tracks
past the railway station to the community of Faulder, then west to Osprey Lake. Portions of the trail
are wheelchair and stroller friendly.
Landry Trail
Landry Trail is a paved 1.3 km lakeshore walking and cycling path. It provides a link between Lower Town
and Trout Creek, running parallel to Highway 97 between Landry Crescent and Lakeshore Road. It was
created in 2015 in a partnership between the provincial government and the District of Summerland.
226
Appendix K
References
Barber, J.R., Crooks, K.R., Fristrup, K.M. 2009. "The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial
organisms". Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25(3):180-189
BC Ministry of Community Services, 2005. Development cost charge best practices guide. 3rd Edition.
http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/intergov_relations/library/DCC_Best_Practice_Guide_2005.pdf
BC Ministry of Community Services, 2006. Parkland Acquisition Best Practices Guide. https://www2.
gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/british-columbians-our-governments/local-governments/finance/parkland_
acquisition_best_practices_guide.pdf
BC Ministry of Environment, 2010. Management Plan for the Mountain Goat (Oreamnos americanus)
in British Columbia. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wld/documents/recovery/management_plans/MtGoat_
MP_Final_28May2010.pdf
BC Ministry of Environment & Climate Change Strategy. Glossary for Species & Ecosystems At Risk.
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/plants-animals-ecosystems/conservation-data-
centre/explore-cdc-data/glossary-for-species-ecosystems-at-risk
Canadian Parks and Recreation Association/Interprovincial Sport and Recreation Council, 2015. A
Framework for Recreation in Canada - 2015 - Pathways to Wellbeing. Ottawa: Canadian Recreation
and Parks Association. 40 pages. www.lin.ca
District of Summerland. 2015-2019 Strategic Plan. http://www.summerland.ca/docs/default-source/

administration/council/district-of-summerland-2015-2019-strategic-plan.pdf?sfvrsn=2
District of Summerland, 2011. Summerland’s Community Climate Action Plan. https://www.

summerland.ca/docs/default-source/works-and-utilities/climate-action/march-23-2011---final---
summerland-ccap.pdf?sfvrsn=9274f9fb_2
227
District of Summerland, 2016. Cultural Plan. http://www.summerland.ca/docs/default-source/default-
document-library/district-of-summerland-cultural-plan---adopted-september-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=0
District of Summerland, 2017. Official Community Plan. https://www.summerland.ca/docs/

default-source/development-services/bylaws/2014-ocp---schedule-a-consolidated-to-2017-11-27.
pdf?sfvrsn=9864f4fb_2
Government of Canada, 2017. Recovery Strategy for the Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus),
the Great Basin Gophersnake (Pituophis catenifer deserticola) and the Desert Nightsnake
(Hypsiglena chlorophaea) in Canada 2017. https://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.
asp?lang=En&n=B6D9C7DE-1&offset=2&toc=show
Green Communities Committee, 2014. Becoming Carbon Neutral: A Guidebook for Local Governments
in British Columbia https://www.toolkit.bc.ca/sites/default/files/BecomingCarbonNeutralGuideV3.pdf
Lakeshore Racquets Club, 2018. "Review of Summerland’s Tennis Courts On behalf of District of
Summerland Recreation Department". April 10.
Lenth, B., Knight, R.L., Brennan, M.E. 2008. "The effects of dogs on wildlife communities". Natural
Areas Journal 28(3):218-227
Leung Y.-F. and Marion J. L., 2000 "Recreation impacts and management in wilderness a state-of-
knowledge review". In Cole D. N. McCool S. F. Borrie W. T. and OLoughlin J. comps. Wilderness Science
in a Time of Change Conference - Volume 5 Wilderness Ecosystems Threats and Management May
23-27 1999 Missoula MT pp. 23-48 . Proc. RMRS-P-15-VOL-5. Ogden UT USDA Forest Service Rocky
Mountain Research Station.
Miller, S.G., Knight, R.L., Miller, C.K. 2001. "Responses to pedestrians and dogs". Wildlife Society Bulletin
29(1):124-132
Moore, R. (2014). Nature Play & Learning Places. Creating and managing places where children engage
with nature. Raleigh, NC: Natural Learning Initiative and Reston, VA: National Wildlife Federation
Version 1.4.
Narayanaraj, Ganapathy and Wimberly, Michael C., 2012. "Influences of forest roads on the spatial
patterns of human- and lightning-caused wildfire ignitions". Applied Geography , Volume 32 (2) – Mar
1, 2012.
Peatt, Allison, SOSCP Environmental Planner, providing environmental planning support services to
SOSCP local government partners. Personal communication, December 24, 2017 and February 23,
2018.
228
Reed, Sarah E. and Merenlender, Adina M., 2008. "Quiet, Nonconsumptive Recreation Reduces
Protected Area Effectiveness". Conservation Letters xx (2008) 1–9.
Simpson, David, 2006. "Database focus: impact of hiking on trails and environment". https://www.
cabi.org/leisuretourism/news/16160
Snetsinger, Susan and White, Katy, 2009. Recreation and Trail Impacts on Wildlife Species of Interest
in Mount Spokane State Park. Pacific Biodiversity Institute. http://www.pacificbio.org/publications/
vegetation/state_parks/wa_east/Mt_Spokane_Trails_PBI_report.pdf
Statistics Canada, 2017. Census Profile for Summerland (District municipality). 2016 Census.
Tennis Canada, 2008. Finding the Sweet Spot: A Step by Step Guide to Community Tennis Facility
Development.
229

2018 Final Parks Recreation Master Plan (Web Version)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2018 Final Parks Recreation Master Plan (Web Version)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2018 Final Parks Recreation Master Plan (Web Version)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

District of Summerland

Parks & Recreation

Final Master Plan

June 20, 2018

Chris Becker, Parks and Recreation Commission

Erik Lees, LEES+Associates

Public phone survey and online survey by the Mustel Group.

Table of Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................. 1

3 Summerland’s Parks and Recreation System................................... 19

8 Service Delivery...................................................................................... 115

9 Implementation Plan.............................................................................. 123

Appendix A – Engagement Activities.................................................................. .141

Appendix B – Survey Summary.............................................................................. 144

Appendix C – Youth Engagement Summary....................................................... 180

Appendix D – Open House #1 Feedback............................................................ 184

Appendix E – Community Feedback on Draft Master Plan............................... 189

Appendix F – Environmental Values...................................................................... 199

Appendix G – Summerland’s Community Climate Action Plan....................... 210

Appendix H – Summerland’s Parks........................................................................ 213

Appendix I – Places for Dogs.................................................................................. 221

Appendix J – Summerland's Most Prominent Trails............................................. 225

Appendix K – References........................................................................................ 227

This Parks and Recreation Master Plan provides strategic direction to

VISION AND PRINCIPLES

Summerland’s parks and recreation system contributes to a high quality

• Parks and recreation facilities are accessible, affordable and

• Residents are inspired and actively engaged in a healthy lifestyle.

• Residents of all ages have pride in the community and a strong

• Parks, recreation and community facilities are linked through a

• Parks, trails, and recreation facilities and programs attract new

• Summerland’s history and culture are celebrated.

• Education, interpretation and health promotion are important.

• Partnerships are encouraged and supported to deliver a wide

• The environment is respected, protected, enhanced and

• Staff, volunteers, visitors and partners are valued.

Summerland has considerably more total parkland than similar sized BC

Much of Summerland lies within a 10-minute walk of a park (800 meters)

As a tourist destination, Summerland’s parks are used by both residents

This Master Plan provides a parks classification scheme and

Summerland has a variety of excellent parks, which include several

This Master Plan provides an inventory of Summerland’s parks and

Summerland has ten playgrounds, which are well-maintained and

Outdoor Sports Amenities

Summerland is well-served for outdoor sports amenities and the sports

Summerland is well-served for the number of public tennis courts,

Summerland has outdoor basketball courts at Dale Meadows Park and

Places for Dogs

Summerland has fewer off-leash dog parks than selected other

Beaches and Water Access

Summerland has public beaches, piers and walkways to provide public

Trees offer significant environmental and human health benefits. An

Summerland’s parks are well-maintained, and staff utilize current

Regular communication with sports field users and development

Summerland’s network of mountain bike trails is growing in popularity,

Trail users identified a pressing need for improved wayfinding, promotion

The importance of connectivity was identified in engagement with

The District of Summerland intends to undertake a Trails Master Plan,

The District also works with community groups to operate more

Indoor recreation facilities in nearby neighbouring cities help meet

There is very strong public support for improvements to indoor facilities.