Rex Heuermann Superseding Bail Application From June 6, 2024

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 37

SUPREME COURT OF SUFFOLK COUNTY

STATE OF NEW YORK


-----------------------------------------------------------------x
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

C.P.L. §530.40
- against - BAIL APPLICATION

Indictment No. 71635-24


REX A. HEUERMANN,
(Mazzei, J.)

Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x

On July 14, 2023, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann was charged by a Grand Jury with the

following six counts, which had been incorporated in Suffolk County Indictment # 71889-23:

 MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section

125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Melissa Barthelemy on or

about July 10, 2009;

 MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section

125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Megan Waterman on or about

June 6, 2010;

 MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section

125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Amber Costello on or about

September 2, 2010;

 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law

Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Melissa Barthelemy on or

about July 10, 2009;


 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law

Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Megan Waterman on or

about June 6, 2010; and

 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law

Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Amber Costello on or about

September 2, 2010.

***

On January 16, 2024, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann was charged by the Grand Jury in a

Superseding Indictment, Suffolk County Indictment # 70126-24, which incorporated not only the

above counts, but the additional charge of:

 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law

Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Maureen Brainard-Barnes

on or about July 9, 2007.

***

Today, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann stands before this Court charged by the Grand Jury in

another Superseding Indictment, which incorporates each and every one of the above counts, as well

as the additional charges of:

 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law

Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Jessica Taylor on or about

or between July 21-26, 2003; and

 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law

Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Sandra Costilla on or about

and between November 19-20, 1993.

2
The People filed a written bail application at Rex A. Heuermann’s initial arraignment, which

occurred on July 14, 2023, as well as at Defendant’s arraignment on the initial Superseding

Indictment, which occurred on January 16, 2024. Those applications are annexed hereto as Exhibit

A.

On July 14, 2023, the Hon. Richard Ambro ordered that Defendant Rex A. Heuermann be

remanded without bail. The matter was subsequently adjourned to August 1, 2023, before the Hon.

Timothy P. Mazzei. On August 1, 2023, and in the ensuing appearances that have followed, this

Court has continued to remand the Defendant without bail.

Set forth below is the People’s bail application in support of the new Superseding Indictment,

which will expand on additional evidentiary developments in this investigation now charging

Defendant Heuermann with the murders of two additional victims, Jessica Taylor and Sandra Costilla.

Based on Defendant Heuermann’s indictment on additional murder charges as it pertains to

now a fifth and sixth victim, the serious and heinous nature of these serial murders, the planning and

forethought that went into these crimes, the strength of the People’s case, the length of incarceration

the Defendant faces upon conviction, the extended period of time that this Defendant was able to

avoid apprehension, and the remaining facts set forth herein and contained within Exhibit A, the

People remain steadfast that the only means to ensure Defendant Rex A. Heuermann’s return to Court

is to remand him without bail.

The 2003 and 2011 Discovery of the Human Remains of Jessica Taylor

On or about July 26, 2003, an individual whose identity is known to law enforcement

(hereinafter “WITNESS 1”) was walking his/her dog just west of Halsey Manor Road, Manorville,

Suffolk County, NY. At that time, WITNESS 1 observed what appeared to be human remains,

which prompted him/her to call 911. Upon arrival, members of the SCPD observed the remains

3
of a female, later identified as Jessica Taylor. Ms. Taylor was found lying on her back with her

legs bent underneath her. Notably, the victim was decapitated and both of Ms. Taylor’s arms had

been severed from her body below her elbows. Moreover, a tattoo on the victim’s torso had been

severely obliterated by a sharp object. Investigators believe the mutilation of the victim’s tattoo,

decapitation of her head, and dismemberment of Ms. Taylor’s arms, were acts perpetrated by Rex

A. Heuermann to, inter alia, inhibit the identification of the victim via facial recognition,

fingerprints and/or tattoo identification. During the initial investigation in Manorville in 2003, the

victim’s head, arms, and hands were not found at the scene and their location remained unknown

to law enforcement for approximately eight years.

On March 29, 2011, Ms. Taylor’s skull, hands, and forearm were discovered along Ocean

Parkway, just east of Gilgo Beach, Suffolk County, NY. Notably, Ms. Taylor’s remains were

located on the same side of the road from where Maureen Brainard-Barnes, Melissa Barthelemy,

Megan Waterman, and Amber Costello (hereinafter the “Gilgo Four”) had been found just several

months prior in December 2010. Each of the Gilgo Four victims, as well as the skull, hands, and

forearm of Ms. Taylor, were recovered on the same side of the road and at a depth of within 50

feet from the edge of the parkway. Furthermore, Ms. Taylor’s remains were located less than a

mile from where the Gilgo Four were discovered (see embedded image on the following page).

HEREINAFTER, SPACES LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

4
Information Relevant to the Disappearance of Jessica Taylor

Jessica Taylor was last seen on or about July 19, 2003 in New York City. The investigation

to date has established that in July 2003, Ms. Taylor was working as a sex worker in the area of

Midtown Manhattan.

On July 21, 2003, at approximately 8:41 p.m., Ms. Taylor utilized her cellular phone

(hereinafter the “TAYLOR PHONE”) to speak to her mother. Based on witness interviews and an

analysis of telephone records, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force has learned that the two spoke for

approximately seven (7) minutes. During that call, Ms. Taylor had arranged to visit her mother on

July 25, 2003, in Poughkeepsie, NY, for her mother’s birthday. Less than two hours later, at

approximately 10:22 p.m., the TAYLOR PHONE placed an outgoing call, which lasted

approximately two minutes. Thereafter, the TAYLOR PHONE records reveal no further outgoing

5
calls or accepted incoming calls. On or about July 25, 2003, when her daughter failed to arrive at her

Poughkeepsie residence or answer any phone calls, Ms. Taylor’s mother notified law enforcement.

At the time of Ms. Taylor’s disappearance, Rex A. Heuermann worked in the same vicinity

as where Ms. Taylor was known to “street walk,” i.e., work as a sex worker. Records seized during

the execution of prior search warrants reveal Heuermann was in fact present in Midtown Manhattan

on July 21, 2003, the same date Ms. Taylor disappeared.

On July 26, 2003, and in the days thereafter, members of the SCPD canvassed the area around

Halsey Manor Road, Manorville, in the vicinity of where Ms. Taylor’s remains had been found. As

a result, investigators spoke to a witness who had, on July 25, 2003, at approximately 10:30 p.m.,

observed a dark-colored Chevrolet pickup truck backed-in to the same wooded area where Ms.

Taylor’s body was later found. Based upon their investigation, law enforcement determined that these

observations would have occurred approximately 13 hours before WITNESS 1’s 911 call. Notably,

the investigation to date has established that Defendant Heuermann purchased a 2002 dark-colored

Chevrolet Avalanche pick-up truck, on or about March 22, 2002, from Ramp Chevrolet in Port

Jefferson Station, NY. Accordingly, on July 25, 2003, at 10:30 p.m., Defendant Heuermann would

have been in possession of a vehicle matching the description of the one observed in the vicinity of

where Ms. Taylor’s remains had been found on Halsey Manor Road.

A forensic analysis of Rex A. Heuermann’s digital devices also revealed the following: (1)

that on or about July 28, 2003, Rex A. Heuermann accessed a Newsday Article entitled, “Cops Seek

Help in IDing Manorville Body,” regarding the discovery of Ms. Taylor’s human remains. That

online activity was subsequently deleted; and (2) on or about July 29, 2003, Rex A. Heuermann

conducted an internet search for a new Chevrolet Avalanche despite his 2002 Avalanche being just

over one year old (see embedded image below). The analysis further shows Heuermann also

6
attempted to delete this search for a new vehicle. Id. Notably, this activity occurred just days after

Ms. Taylor was discovered and just days after witnesses observed a vehicle matching the physical

description of Heuermann’s leaving the scene.

7
Finally, while the make and model of the vehicle Heuermann searched for is the same as

his 2002 vehicle (Chevrolet Avalanche pick-up truck), the exterior color is different, i.e., “Arrival

Blue” (see embedded image below), as well as another in “Summit White,” which are significantly

brighter exterior paint offerings by Chevrolet when compared to Heuermann’s dark-green 2002

Chevrolet Avalanche.

Hairs Recovered from the Remains of Jessica Taylor

During the course of this investigation, Ms. Taylor’s body was examined by a Forensic

Scientist with the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory (hereinafter “SCCL”), which revealed that

Ms. Taylor had been decapitated, dismembered at her arms below her elbows, and revealed

8
“irregular disruption” of the victim’s nipples1 and the “obliteration” of her tattoo. During the

examination of Ms. Taylor’s body, a male human hair was recovered, specifically from a surgical

drape that had been underneath the victim (hereinafter “Male Hair Underneath Taylor”). A

subsequent examination of the Male Hair Underneath Taylor led to the determination that it was a

human head hair with Caucasian/European characteristics; however, it was, based on the DNA

testing capabilities at the SCCL, unsuitable for further DNA testing at that time.

On or about August 24, 2023, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force brought a cutting of the Male

Hair Underneath Taylor to an outside forensics laboratory (previously referred to in Exhibit A as

“Forensic Laboratory # 2”), which specializes in forensic mitochondrial analysis. On or about

February 1, 2024, Forensic Laboratory # 2 issued a report concluding that the mitochondrial DNA

profile developed from the Male Hair Underneath Taylor and the profile developed from

Defendant’s buccal swab are the same, specifically at a rate that would, as per the EMPOP

database,2 exclude 99.96% of the North American population as the contributor of said hair

recovered underneath the decapitated and dismembered remains of Jessica Taylor. While 99.96%

of the North American population can be excluded as the contributor of the Male Hair Underneath

Taylor, Defendant Heuermann cannot be excluded as the contributor of the said hair recovered

underneath the remains of Jessica Taylor.

On or about March 8, 2024, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force brought a cutting of the Male

Hair Underneath Taylor and a DNA extract of Rex A. Heuermann’s buccal swab to an outside,

1
Witnesses from the Suffolk County Medical Examiner’s Office have determined that the
“irregular disruption” of the victim’s nipples did not occur naturally, and one possible cause of
such disruption is the post-mortem mutilation of the victim’s nipples.
2
EMPOP is shorthand for the “European DNA Profile Group (EDNAP) mitochondrial DNA
Population Database,” which is a web-based collection of human mitochondrial sequence data
from various populations worldwide. The North American database includes 12,386 sequences of
North American forensic significance.
9
independent laboratory (previously referred to in Exhibit A as Forensic Laboratory # 1), which

applies DNA techniques and direct genome sequencing in difficult-to-solve forensic casework and

the identification of human remains.

On or about April 29, 2024, Forensic Laboratory # 1 issued a report indicating it had

developed a nuclear DNA profile for not only the Male Hair Underneath Taylor, but also from Rex

A. Heuermann’s buccal swab. Forensic Laboratory # 1 was then able to conduct a one-to-one

autosomal nuclear DNA comparison between said profile (developed from the Male Hair

Underneath Taylor) to Rex Heuermann’s SNP Genotype File (developed from his buccal swab),

which resulted in the conclusion that the DNA profile generated from the Male Hair Underneath

Taylor is 1.837 x 10603 times more likely to have come from a person genetically identical to Rex

Heuermann’s SNP Genotype File than from an unrelated individual.3

Based on the foregoing, it is significant that two forensic laboratories have now

independently determined that the aforementioned hair recovered from the surgical drape

underneath the remains of Jessica Taylor, are substantially more likely to have derived from a

person genetically identical to Defendant Heuermann’s mitochondrial and nuclear profiles, which

provides further support that Rex A. Heuermann murdered, dismembered, decapitated, and

transported the remains of Jessica Taylor to Manorville and Gilgo Beach until the victim’s remains

were ultimately discovered in July 2003 and March 2011, respectively.

Heuermann’s Family Travel in Relation to the Disappearance of Jessica Taylor

As part of the ongoing investigation, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force has also established

that Heuermann’s wife and children were out of state at the time of Ms. Taylor’s disappearance

3
The 1.837 x 10603 statistic, and the following statistical probabilities, are provided in scientific
notation. The standard notation for 1.837 x 10603 is 1,837 with 600 zeros thereafter.
10
and murder, a consistent theme attributable to the Defendant for each of the charged homicides

thus far, which would have allowed the Defendant unfettered time and opportunity to execute these

crimes.

Specifically, in 2002-2003, Defendant Heuermann’s daughter, Victoria, was a

Kindergarten student at the McKenna Elementary School located in Massapequa Park, NY. At

the time, Victoria was classmates with an individual whose identity is also known to law

enforcement (hereinafter “WITNESS 2”). Based on post-arrest interviews with witnesses,

including WITNESS 2’s family and Victoria Heuermann, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force has

learned that, at the conclusion of the kindergarten school year, Ms. Ellerup and her two children

vacationed with WITNESS 2’s family from on or about July 20, 2003 through on or about July

27, 2003 at Smuggler’s Notch Resort, which is located in Jeffersonville, VT. Rex A. Heuermann

did not attend this trip.

These witness accounts have been corroborated via telephone records and electronic data

seized during the execution of the July 2023 search warrants. For example, agents of the Gilgo

Homicide Task Force seized AT&T records, which detail calls made to and from the Heuermann

residence in July 2003 (see embedded excerpt on the following page). These records show that

during the aforementioned family vacation, the landline telephone associated with the Heuermann

residence, which was located at 105 First Avenue, Massapequa Park, NY (hereinafter “TARGET

RESIDENCE”) made several phone calls to a telephone number bearing an (802) area code.

Further investigation has tied this phone number to Smuggler’s Notch Resort. Thus, investigators

believe Defendant Heuermann made these calls, from TARGET RESIDENCE in Massapequa

Park, to his family staying in Jeffersonville, VT.

11
12
The Gilgo Homicide Task Force also seized phone records attributable to Heuermann’s

Manhattan business, RH Consultants and Associates. These records further corroborate

Heuermann’s stay in New York and the family’s travel to Jeffersonville, VT as Heuermann’s work

landline makes numerous calls, during the same week of July 20-27, 2003, from Manhattan, NY

to the Smuggler’s Notch Resort (see embedded image below).

13
Finally, in July 2023, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force seized a hard drive from the basement

of TARGET RESIDENCE. An extraction and analysis of that hard drive revealed that it contained

a Palm Pilot back-up file, which appeared to contain Defendant Heuermann’s “date book” or

calendar for the relevant dates. The Gilgo Homicide Task Force subsequently hired a digital

forensics expert who, by utilizing native Palm software, was able to convert the above data into a

readable format (see embedded image below).

14
Based on the foregoing, the investigation to date has clearly established Defendant

Heuermann’s wife and children were indeed located out of state during the time of Jessica Taylor’s

disappearance, which occurred on or about July 21, 2003. Accordingly, the murders of all four

charged victims, and now the murder of Ms. Taylor, occurred at times when Defendant

Heuermann’s wife and children were located out of state, which would have allowed Defendant

Heuermann unfettered time to execute his plans for Ms. Taylor, which included the decapitation,

dismemberment, and transportation of her remains, without any fear that his family would uncover

or learn of his involvement in these crimes.

The 1993 Discovery of the Human Remains of Sandra Costilla

On or about November 20, 1993, two individuals, while hunting in a wooded area of

Southampton, in the vicinity of 50 Old Fish Cove Road, North Sea, Suffolk County, NY,

discovered the remains of Sandra Costilla, DOB: 8/25/1965. The victim, who had been 28-years

old at the time, was lying on her back with her arms outstretched over her head with her uncovered

legs spread apart. The victim’s shirt had been pulled up over her torso and head, exposing the

victim’s breasts. The victim had numerous sharp force injuries to, inter alia, her face, torso,

breasts, left thigh, and vaginal area.

Ms. Costilla was a native of Trinidad and Tobago but had been living in New York prior

to her disappearance and murder.

Hairs Recovered from the Remains of Sandra Costilla

During the course of the 1993 investigation, Ms. Costilla’s body was examined by a

Forensic Scientist with the SCCL, which led to the recovery of, inter alia, three hairs from the

victim’s remains, one from the victim’s right arm (hereinafter “Female Hair on Costilla”), one

from a tape-lift of the striped shirt above the victim’s head (hereinafter “Male Hair on Costilla”),

15
as well as one from a tape-lift of the white shirt above the victim’s head (hereinafter “Unidentified

Female Hair on Costilla”) (collectively “Hairs on Costilla”).

In 2014, well before the identification of Rex A. Heuermann as a suspect in Ms. Costilla’s

murder, the Hairs on Costilla were sent to Forensic Laboratory # 2, which was able to develop

unique mitochondrial DNA profiles for each of the Hairs on Costilla. On or about August 1, 2014,

Forensic Laboratory # 2 received an extract of John Bittrolff’s buccal swab. Forensic Laboratory

# 2 was then able to develop a mitochondrial DNA profile from John Bittrolff’s buccal swab and

subsequently compared it to the mitochondrial DNA profiles that had been previously generated

for each of the Hairs on Costilla. At the conclusion of its analysis, Forensic Laboratory # 2 was

able to exclude John Bittrolff, and his maternal relatives, as contributors of the Hairs on Costilla.

Recently, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force requested Forensic Laboratory # 2 undergo

forensic testing, specifically comparing mitochondrial DNA profiles for each of the Hairs on

Costilla, which had been developed back in 2014, prior to Heuermann emerging as a suspect in

Ms. Costilla’s murder, to known samples provided by the Gilgo Homicide Task Force. On or

about February 29, 2024, Forensic Laboratory # 2 issued a report concluding that the mitochondrial

DNA profile developed from the Male Hair on Costilla and the profile developed from Defendant’s

buccal swab are the same, specifically at a rate that would, as per the EMPOP database, exclude

99.96% of the North American population as the contributor of the aforementioned hair recovered

on the mutilated remains of Sandra Costilla. Based on the foregoing, while 99.96% of the North

American population can be excluded as the contributor of the Male Hair on Costilla, Defendant

Heuermann cannot be excluded as the contributor of the Male Hair on Costilla.

Prior to Ms. Costilla’s disappearance and murder, Defendant Heuermann had been living

with a female individual, whose identity is known to law enforcement (hereinafter “WITNESS

16
3”). During the course of this investigation, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force was able to secure a

buccal swab from WITNESS 3, which was secured via her consent.

On or about March 29, 2024, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force brought a DNA extract of

WITNESS 3’s buccal swab to Forensic Laboratory # 2 for further analysis. On or about May 8,

2024, Forensic Laboratory # 2 issued a report concluding that the mitochondrial DNA profile

developed from WITNESS 3’s buccal swab and the profile developed from the Female Hair on

Costilla “share a common base at all compared positions,” specifically at a rate that would, as per

the EMPOP database, exclude 99.98% of the North American population as the contributor of said

hair recovered on the mutilated remains of Sandra Costilla. While 99.98% of the North American

population can be excluded as the contributor of the Female Hair on Costilla, WITNESS 3, who

had, but no longer resided at TARGET RESIDENCE prior to Ms. Costilla’s disappearance and

murder, cannot be excluded as the contributor of said hair recovered on Ms. Costilla.

On or about March 8, 2024, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force brought a cutting of the Hairs

on Costilla, as well as a DNA extract of WITNESS 3’s buccal swab, to Forensic Laboratory # 1

for further, independent analysis. On or about April 29, 2024, Forensic Laboratory # 1 issued a

report indicating its ability to develop a nuclear DNA profile for the Male Hair on Costilla.

Forensic Laboratory # 1 was then able to conduct a one-to-one autosomal nuclear DNA

comparison between said profile (developed from the Male Hair on Costilla) to Rex A.

Heuermann’s SNP Genotype File (developed from his buccal swab), which resulted in the

conclusion that the DNA profile generated from the Male Hair on Costilla, which was recovered

from Ms. Costilla’s mutilated remains, is 4.347 x 10332 times more likely to have come from a

person genetically identical to Rex Heuermann’s SNP Genotype File than from an unrelated

17
individual. 4

Forensic Laboratory # 1 was also able to generate nuclear DNA profiles from not only the

extract of WITNESS 3’s buccal swab, but also the Female Hair on Costilla. Forensic Laboratory

# 1 was then able to conduct a one-to-one autosomal nuclear DNA comparison between said profile

(developed from WITNESS 3’s buccal swab) to the SNP Genotype File developed from the

Female Hair on Costilla, which resulted in the conclusion that the DNA profile generated from the

Female Hair on Costilla, is 4.578 x 101040 times more likely to have come from a person genetically

identical to WITNESS 3’s SNP Genotype File than from an unrelated individual.5

Based on the foregoing, it is significant that two forensic laboratories have now

independently determined that male hair recovered from the mutilated remains of Sandra Costilla,

is substantially more likely to have derived from a person genetically identical to Defendant

Heuermann’s mitochondrial and nuclear profiles. Additionally, both laboratories were also able

to forensically tie WITNESS 3, who had resided at TARGET RESIDENCE prior to Ms. Costilla’s

disappearance and murder, to the female hair recovered on Ms. Costilla’s remains. The foregoing

provides further support that Rex A. Heuermann mutilated, murdered, and transported the body of

Sandra Costilla to Southampton.

***

The chart below summarizes the results from Forensic Laboratory # 1 and Forensic

Laboratory # 2, which each individually have been able to determine that hairs recovered on now

five of the six charged victims are forensically tied to Defendant Heuermann, members of his

immediate family, or individuals with whom Heuermann resided, lending further support to the

4
The standard notation for 4.347 x 10332 is 4,347 with 329 zeros thereafter. The investigation into
the contributor of the Unidentified Female Hair on Costilla remains ongoing.
5
The standard notation for 4.578 x 101040 is 4,578 with 1,037 zeros thereafter.
18
conclusion that Defendant Heuermann is the individual who murdered, stripped, restrained, and

transported the remains of Jessica Taylor and Sandra Costilla, as well as the Gilgo Four, until they

were each discovered in 1993, 2003, 2010, and 2011.

VICTIM DESIGNATIONAPPROX. MITOCHONDRIAL DNA NUCLEAR (SNP) DNA


IN BAIL LOCATION RESULTS RESULTS
LETTER OF HAIR
RECOVERY
SANDRA MALE HAIR TAPE-LIFT OF 99.96% of North American 4.347 x 10332 Times More Likely
COSTILLA ON COSTILLA STRIPED SHIRT population can be excluded to Come From An Individual with
ABOVE but not REX the Identical Genetic Profile as
VICTIM’S HEUERMANN REX HEUERMANN
HEAD
SANDRA FEMALE HAIR VICTIM’S 99.98% of North American 4.578 x 101040 Times More Likely
COSTILLA ON COSTILLA RIGHT ARM population can be excluded to Come From An Individual with
but not WITNESS 3 the Identical Genetic Profile as
WITNESS 3

JESSICA MALE HAIR ON SURGICAL 99.96% of North American 1.837 x 10603 Times More Likely
TAYLOR UNDERNEATH DRAPE population can be excluded to Come From An Individual with
TAYLOR UNDERNEATH but not REX the Identical Genetic Profile as
VICTIM HEUERMANN REX HEUERMANN

MAUREEN FEMALE HAIR BUCKLE OF 7.9 Trillion Times More Likely to


BRAINARD ON BARNES BELT N/A Come From An Individual with
BARNES RESTRAINING the Identical Genetic Profile as
LOWER BODY ASA ELLERUP
MEGAN [FIRST OF] OUTSIDE HEAD 99.69% of North American 2.374 x 1048 Times More Likely to
WATERMAN TWO FEMALE AREA population can be excluded Come From An Individual with
HAIRS ON but not ASA ELLERUP or the Identical Genetic Profile as
WATERMAN VICTORIA HEUERMANN ASA ELLERUP
MEGAN [SECOND OF] TAPE IN THE 2.778 x 10480 Times More Likely
WATERMAN TWO FEMALE AREA OF THE N/A to Come From An Individual with
HAIRS ON HEAD the Identical Genetic Profile as
WATERMAN ASA ELLERUP
MEGAN MALE HAIR BOTTOM 99.96% of North American 1.408 x 10169 Times More Likely
WATERMAN ON PORTION OF population can be excluded to Come From An Individual with
WATERMAN BURLAP but not REX the Identical Genetic Profile as
HEUERMANN REX HEUERMANN
AMBER FEMALE HAIR TAPE IN THE 99.98% of North American 4.654 x 1063 Times More Likely to
COSTELLO ON COSTELLO AREA OF THE population can be excluded Come From An Individual with
HEAD but not ASA ELLERUP or the Identical Genetic Profile as
VICTORIA HEUERMANN VICTORIA HEUERMANN

19
Heuermann’s Unfettered Access to TARGET RESIDENCE during the
disappearance and murder of Ms. Sandra Costilla

As noted supra, based on post-arrest interviews with witnesses, the Gilgo Homicide Task

Force has learned that WITNESS 3 and Defendant Heuermann began living together at TARGET

RESIDENCE in 1991. In September 1993, approximately two months before Ms. Costilla’s

disappearance and murder, WITNESS 3 moved out of TARGET RESIDENCE. Prior to

WITNESS 3 leaving TARGET RESIDENCE, Heuermann’s mother had moved out of TARGET

RESIDENCE.

Based on the foregoing, neither Heuermann’s mother, nor WITNESS 3 were living at

TARGET RESIDENCE during the time of Sandra Costilla’s murder. Accordingly, the murders

of all four charged victims, and now the murders of Ms. Taylor and Ms. Costilla, occurred at times

when Defendant Heuermann would have had unfettered time to execute his plans for each victim

without any fear that his family or others residing at TARGET RESIDENCE would uncover or

learn of his involvement in these crimes.

Newly Discovered Digital Evidence

As detailed in Exhibit A, following Heuermann’s arrest, numerous search warrants were

executed at TARGET RESIDENCE, which culminated in, inter alia, the seizure of over 350

electronic devices. In the months subsequent to Heuermann’s arrest, the Gilgo Homicide Task

Force has attempted to extract and analyze data from each of these devices.

An analysis of these devices has revealed Heuermann’s significant collection of violent,

bondage, and torture pornography, currently dating back to 1994. The pornographic images

accessed by Heuermann include, but are not limited to, breast mutilation, vaginal torture, sex

substitution (i.e., penetration with an object), the sexualization of decapitated women, bondage,

and whipping, which notably and largely coincide with how the remains of Sandra Costilla, Jessica

20
Taylor, and Valerie Mack were discovered.

Moreover, during the analysis of a hard drive recovered from the basement of Heuermann’s

residence, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force recently discovered a Microsoft Word document

entitled “HK2002-04.” The document was discovered in “unallocated space.” “Allocated space”

refers to stored data that a computer is using (files are that viewable and able to be opened by a

user). On the other hand, “unallocated space” refers to available or “unstructured” data, which is

not readily viewable and able to be opened by a user. Unallocated space frequently contains room

for “new data” or “old data” that has been deleted, sent to the “recycle bin,” overwritten, etc. For

example, when a user deletes data, many users believe the file has been purged forever. However,

“deleting” a file only tells the computer that the space previously occupied by that file is now

available. The “deleted” data will remain in “unallocated space” until another file is written over

it. Data contained within “unallocated space” can be retrieved via a computer forensic extraction

method called “file carving.”

A forensic analysis of the “HK2002-04” document reveals that it was not only a locally-

created draft (i.e., not downloaded from the internet), but also recovered from a hard-drive that

indicates it was utilized by Heuermann himself. While the original document appears to have been

created in 2000, based on its original title (“HK 2000-03”), this iteration of the Word Document

(titled “HK 2002-04”) appears to have been created and modified between 2001 and 2002. Based

on the foregoing and the facts set forth infra, the Task Force members believe “2000” or “2002”

to be a reference to calendar years. The Task Force members also believe, based on the foregoing

and the facts set forth infra, the Microsoft Word document to be a “planning document” utilized

by Heuermann to methodically blueprint and “plan out” his “kills” (hereinafter referred to as “HK

Planning Document”). Attached hereto as Exhibit B.

21
The HK Planning Document begins with a four-category section with the underlined

headings of “PROBLEMS,” “SUPPLIES,” “DS,” and “TRG” (see embedded excerpt on the

following page):6

Based on the Gilgo Homicide Task Force’s training and experience, the members believe

“PROBLEMS” to be a guide on issues to avoid apprehension, “SUPPLIES” to be a reference to

what supplies are needed to carry out the serial murders, to avoid apprehension, and to avoid

leaving behind DNA evidence. The “DS” heading appears to be an acronym for “dump site,”

which is corroborated by, inter alia, the discoveries of Valerie Mack and Jessica Taylor at two

separate “dump sites,” i.e., the vicinity of Mill Road and Ocean Parkway. Under that same heading

6
No alterations (other than the addition of call-out boxes where applicable) have been made to
excerpts of the HK Planning Document. The document is portrayed in the same manner that it was
recovered from in unallocated space, with no changes in formatting or spelling.
22
is a note regarding “dumpster sites,” which the Task Force members believe is a reference to how

Heuermann disposed of physical evidence in the manner described infra (see “DISPOSE OF THE

FOLLOWING” section below). “TRG” appears to be a reference to target or victim (see embedded

image below). It is important to note that the known victims thus far are all petite women, which

is consistent with the “SMALL IS GOOD” entry in the document, lending further support to the

aforementioned conclusion that “TRG” refers to victims or “targets.”

With regards to the “DS” section of the document, it is important to note that the human

remains of Jessica Taylor discovered in 2003, as well as the remains of Valerie Mack discovered

in 2000, were dumped in two locations, one of those locations being the vicinity of Mill Road,

which is listed as “DS-1, Mill Rd.” in the above Word document. On March 29, 2011, Ms. Taylor’s

torso skull and hands recovered near Ocean Parkway, i.e., a second “dump site.” On April 4, 2011,

Ms. Mack’s skull, hands, and right foot were also recovered near Ocean Parkway, also a second

“dump site.” The recent discovery of this document prompted the April 2024 cadaver search of

the Manorville area, which did not yield the recovery of additional sets of human remains, thereby

reinforcing the Task Force members’ belief that the HK Planning Document refers to Heuermann’s

preparations for either Jessica Taylor and/or Valerie Mack.

23
The HK Planning Document on Heuermann’s computer then delves into a three-category

section with the headings of “PRE-PREP,” “PREP,” and “POST-EVENT” (see embedded excerpt

below):

The Gilgo Homicide Task Force members believe “PRE-PREP” to be a guide on steps to

take in advance of a homicide, i.e., inspecting his vehicle, engaging the target, conducting a

“RECON”7 or survey of video surveillance cameras in pertinent areas including the “PICK-

ZONE” (i.e., location where a victim is picked-up), and checking the weather to ensure for optimal

conditions. “PREP,” on the other hand, appears to be a reference to steps taken closer in-time to

homicide, i.e., setting up the “staging area,” “holding area,” and “table/cross bar/hard point” for

the victim.

Specifically, the “PREP” section has five entries: “SET-UP STAGE,” “HOLDING

AREA,” “BUILD TABLE,” “CROSS BAR,” and “HARD POINT.” The Gilgo Homicide Task

Force members are aware that a “CROSS BAR” is often placed underneath tables to provide

further structural support for heavier objects being placed on a table. Additionally, the Task Force

members are also aware that a “HARD POINT” refers, in the field of sexual “suspension bondage,”

7
“Recon” is commonly utilized as a shorthand for the word reconnaissance, which means to survey
or research a specific area in order to ascertain particular strategic features.
24
to a fixed attachment point in the ceiling that supports the weight of an individual being suspended

off of the ground, which is corroborated by Heuermann’s significant interest in pornography where

the subject is either suspended, tortured, bound to a table, decapitated, and/or their breasts are

mutilated, which is consistent with the foregoing notations regarding suspension, as well as the

condition of the victims described herein.

Additionally, “POST EVENT” appears to reference a checklist of tasks following the

“event” or homicide to avoid apprehension, i.e., “DISTROY [sic] FILE,” “CHANGE TIRES,”

“BURN GLOVES,” “DISPOSE OF PICS” taken of the victim, and “HAVE STORY SET” (e.g.,

alibi, story for family upon their return, or law enforcement, should an inquiry be made).

The HK Planning Document continues to further expound on preparatory measures such

as specific “RECON” steps taken (see “RECON REPORTS” and “TAKEDOWN/PICKUP”

sections embedded below), “packaging [a body] for transport” (see “BODY PREP” section

embedded below), and steps to inhibit victim identification and avoid leaving behind DNA

evidence (see “BODY PREP” and “DISPOSE OF THE FOLLOWING” sections embedded

below):

25
The “BODY PREP” section above includes a note to “REMOVE HEAD AND HANDS,”

which clearly relates to the condition of Jessica Taylor’s and Valerie Mack’s remains, as both

victims were decapitated and dismembered at their arms below their elbows. Additionally, each

of these victim’s remains, as well as the remains of the “Gilgo Four” were indeed “packaged for

transport,” as this section indicates to do, further increasing the significance of this document’s

presence on Heuermann’s laptop computer. Finally, this section also includes a note to “REMOVE

ID MARKS [TATOOS][sic].” As noted supra, the examination of Ms. Taylor’s body in July 2003

indicated numerous sharp “linear injuries” to the victim’s skin, specifically around where Ms.

Taylor’s tattoo had been located, which investigators believe was intended to inhibit the

26
identification of Ms. Taylor’s tattoo and therefore, Ms. Taylor, in a manner consistent with the HK

Planning Document.

Furthermore, the “DISPOSE OF THE FOLLOWING” section lists “DISTROY [sic]

COMPUTER FILES” as a check-list item. The presence of this HK Planning Document in

“unallocated space” demonstrates Heuermann’s efforts to destroy or delete computer files in a

manner that is consistent with this notation. As set forth in Exhibit A, a consistent theme of

Heuermann’s computer activity is the use of forensic wiping software, inter alia, in a manner that

is consistent with this notation in the HK Planning Document.

In the “THINGS TO REMEMBER” section, there are notes indicating steps to take “next

time,” i.e., considering a hit to the face or neck “NEXT TIME,” or using heavier rope for the neck

as the “LIGHT ROPE BROKE UNDER STRESS OF BEING TIGHTEND [sic]” (see embedded

image below). Heuermann further opines on the importance of sleep to not only avoid

“PROBLEMS” but also to increase what Heuermann refers to as “PLAY TIME.”

27
As set forth above, and embedded here below, the Gilgo Homicide Task Force members

believe these references to “next time” indicate Heuermann’s prior experiences and what changes

to implement moving forward.

Moreover, the references in the THINGS TO REMEMBER” section to utilize “PUSH

PINS TO HANG DROP CLOTHES [sic] FROM CEILING” and “NOT TAPE,” as well as

manifested concerns regarding “SOUND TRAVEL” indicate the referenced incidents would have

occurred indoors, and likely inside of TARGET RESIDENCE, which is a “controlled

environment” that Heuermann would not only be familiar with but also an area where Heuermann

would have access to said tools and supplies. Drop cloths would also serve the twin purposes of

limiting the spread of forensic evidence, such as blood, to a confined area, as well as controlling

sound travel, which would lead to more “PLAY TIME,” which is believed to be a reference to

sexual and mutilation acts perpetrated on victims. Additionally, with Heuermann’s family

vacationing out of state, Defendant would have had unfettered time and exclusive access to the

TARGET RESIDENCE, allowing Defendant Heuermann ample opportunity to execute, and clean

up after, these crimes.

28
Finally, the HK Planning Document on Heuermann’s laptop computer includes a

“NOTES” section (see embedded image below):

The investigation to date has established the source of these notes, i.e., the Mind Hunter

paperback book authored by John Douglas,8 specifically the First Edition published in 1996,

concerning the criminal profiling of serial killers.

For example, the “NOTES” section of the HK Planning Document includes the following

notation:

Page 162 of said book does indeed reference sex substitution (i.e., penetration with an object) as

Douglas describes the “rather horrible sexual mutilation and masturbation over [the victim’s] body,

but no intercourse. The penetration with the umbrella and pen were acts of sexual substitution.”

On page 163, Douglas opines that the perpetrator of such a crime, i.e., sex substitution,

would be a “disorganized” killer who would be “compulsive” and perhaps “living with his

parents.” Accordingly, this notation contained in the HK Planning Document is consistent with

8
John Douglas is a retired special agent and profiler from the FBI, who spent over 25 years in the
FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit. During his time with the FBI, Douglas interviewed over a dozen
serial killers and other violent sexual offenders, which led to numerous publications, including
the “Mind Hunter” book.
29
the aforementioned book in page number and subject matter.

The “NOTES” section of the HK Planning Document also includes the following notation:

In page 175 of the first-edition “Mind Hunter” book, Douglas describes a woman’s screams and

shortly thereafter how the woman’s throat had been cut and her naked body mutilated. Douglas

further asserts, on page 175 of said book, that mutilation is a sign of “disorganized personality

type.” Accordingly, this notation contained in the HK Planning Document is again consistent with

the aforementioned book in page number and subject matter.

The “NOTES” section of the HK Planning Document also contains the following notation:

On page 19 of said book, Douglas notes that while he was still at the FBI, he always advised his

agents, “[i]f you want to understand the artist (the perpetrator), you have to look at the painting

(the victim). We’ve looked at many ‘paintings’ over the years and talked extensively to the most

‘accomplished’ ‘artists.’” Accordingly, the note above, contained in Heuermann’s laptop

computer, to “look at the painting,” yet again points to the aforementioned book as the source of

Heuermann’s commentary. Finally, the other notations contained in the HK Planning Document,

i.e., “SPUR OF THE MOMENT,” “COVER,” “STOCKHOLM SYNDROME,”9 “THE MORE

YOU DO THE MORE CLUES YOU GIVE” are also each contained in the said book, all pointing

to it as the source of Heuermann’s notations.

9
Stockholm Syndrome is a psychological condition that explains why victims or hostages can
sometimes develop a psychological bond or empathy for their captor or abuser.
30
The foregoing is corroborated, in part, by Heuermann’s possession of other serial killer

books authored by John Douglas. During the initial search warrant execution in July 2023 at

TARGET RESIDENCE, the Task Force observed that Heuermann possessed, in his home office,

the book entitled “The Cases That Haunt Us” (see embedded image below), which outlines the

facts, evidence, and victimology of several notable serial murder cases.

31
****

The Gilgo Homicide Task Force members believe that the totality of circumstances

surrounding the HK Planning Document, including Heuermann’s attempt to delete its existence,

points to it as Heuermann’s self-education and “homework” on the topic of carrying out serial,

sexual murder. Heuermann’s pointed concerns regarding (1) avoiding being captured on video

surveillance; (2) leaving behind forensic evidence; (3) what supplies to purchase; (4) how to

package a body for subsequent transportation to “DUMP SITES,” e.g., “wash body inside and all

cavities” prior to “package for transport;” (5) avoiding a “paper trail” tying him to crimes and/or

crime scenes (e.g., “REMEMBER DON’T CHARGE GAS”); (6) concerns regarding noise and/or

air travel, which could inhibit “play time;” and (7) how to “improve” “next time” further confirm,

merely by looking within the four corners of the document itself, its relevance in this regard. This

belief is further corroborated when looking at a litany of external factors, including, inter alia, how

the six (6) victims now attributable to Heuermann were indeed “packaged” and “transported,” and

in the case of Ms. Taylor, how her head, hands, and tattoo were removed and/or obliterated,

consistent with the document’s instructions. Furthermore, an analysis of Heuermann’s computers

confirms the HK Planning document was in “unallocated space” and had hence been deleted,

which is consistent with not only the “DISTROY [sic] COMPUTER FILES” notation, but also

Heuermann’s established use of forensic wiping software.

32
Penalties

If convicted on the current charges, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann faces multiple sentences

of life without parole.

Remand Without Bail is Appropriate

Based on the serious, heinous nature of these serial murders, the strength of the People’s case,

the life incarceration the defendant faces upon conviction, the extreme measures this Defendant took

to attempt to avoid apprehension for over a decade, and Defendant’s indictment on these additional

charges, which now incorporate a fifth and sixth victim, the People remain steadfast that the only

means to ensure the Defendant’s return to court is to remand the Defendant without bail.

DATED: June 6, 2024


Suffolk County, New York

RAYMOND A. TIERNEY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY

________________________________
By: Andrew Lee
Assistant District Attorney

33
EXHIBIT A
(Previously filed, available upon request)
EXHIBIT B
HK2002-04

PROBLEMS SUPPLIES DS TRG


-DNA -BOOTIES DS-1,MILL RD. T-1, MEGAN ?
-TIRE MARKS -LIE / ACID DS-2, ?????? SMALL IS GOOD
-BLOOD STAINS -POLICE SCANER DUMPSTER SITE T-UNK (BLACK)
-FINGER PRINTS -ROPE / CORD (NEXT TIME RECON
-M/O(PLASTIC BAG/ -SAW / CUTTING TOOLS DUMSTER LOCATIONS)
CAT LITTER) -HAIR NETS
-WITNESS -PHOTO FILM
-TRACE SOURCE -BURN CAN
OF SUPPLIES -FOAM DRAIN CLEANER
-FOOT/SHOE PRINTS -BODY WASH/WIPES
-PHOTOS? -TARPS / DROP CLOTHES
-MISS-LEADERS? -MEDICAL GLOVES
-POLICE STOP -BAGS / TAPE
-TRUCK STUCK -LARGE ELEC CLIPS
-FINGER PRINTS -RATCHED CARGO STRAP
IN GLOVES
-PLATIC BAGS MATCHED
TO BOX
-HAIR & FIBER

PRE-PREP PREP POST EVENT


VECH. INSP. SET-UP STAGE DISTROY FILE
ENGAGE T-1 HOLDING AREA CHANGE TIRES
RECON DS-1 BUILD TABLE BURN GLOVES
LOCATE DS-2 CROSS BAR DISPOSE OF PIC’S
WEATHER REPORT HARD POINT HAVE STORY SET
RECON VID. CAMS.
RECON PICK-ZONE FOR VID.CAMS.

NOTES:
 SPUR OF THE MOMENT COVER? STOCKHOLM SYNDROME
 THE MORE YOU DO THE MORE CLUES YOU GIVE
 LOOK AT THE “PAINTING” WHAT-WHY-WHO
 ORIGINANIZED VS. DISORIGINANIZED
 PG 162- SEX SUBTITUTION, PG 163, PG 175 MUILTITION = DISORIGINANIZEDED

RECON REPORTS:
1. VID. CAMS. ON LIE RT 112 TO RT 110 = 33 (OLD)
2. VID. CAMS. ON SS PKWY RT 231 TO EXIT 30 = 10 (OLD)
3. T-1 INFO CELL# 917-294-4402 BEEP/VOICE MAIL 917-898-9854 (OLD)
BODY PREP:
 WASH BODY INSIDE AND ALL CAVITIES
 REMOVE TRACE EVENDICE [FINGER PRINTS/HAIR]
 REMOVE TRACE DNA
 REMOVE ID MARKS [TATOOS, MARKS…..]
 REMOVE MARKS FROM TOURTURE
 REMOVE HEAD AND HANDS
 PACKAGE FOR TRANSPORT

DISPOSE OF THE FOLLOWING:


 TOOLS AND DEVICES
 T-1 CLOTHES AND PERSONAL ITEMS
 DROP CLOTHES
 WIPES AND TOWELS
 PROPS, TOYS, WOOD ITEMS…….
 ANYTHING THAT TOUCHED T-1
 WHAT YOU WORE
 DISTROY BOOK AND COMPUTER FILES.
 BURN GLOVES
 DISPOSE OF BOX OF PLATIC BAS TO AVOID TRACE.

THINGS:TO REMEMBER
 SOUND TRAVELS (IE: BIRD OUTSIDE) CONTROL THE AMOUNT OF AIR IN AND
OUT TO CONTROL THE NOISE MADE.
 GET SLEEP BEFORE HUNT TOO TIRED CREATS PROBLEMS
 HIT HARDER TOO MANY HIT TO TAKE DOWN. CONSIDER A HIT TO THE FACE OR
NECK NEXT TIME FOR TAKE DOWN.
 MORE SLEEP & NOISE CONTROL = MORE PLAY TIME
 USE PUSH PINS TO HANG DROP CLOTHES FROM CEILING – NOT TAPE.
 USE HEVEY ROPE FOR NECK-LIGHT ROPE BROKE UNDER STRESS OF BEING
TIGHTEND.

TAKE DOWN/PICK UP:


 HUNT TOO LONG SEEN IN AREA TOO LONG.
 REMEMBER DON’T CHARGE GAS.
 RECON FOR VID.CAMS. IN PICK UP AREA NEXT TIME.

You might also like