Form №: SL/QMS/1

MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16

CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 1 of 12

Auditor
Auditee
Audit date
Auditee address
Contracted service

Post holders /position Auditee Contact

Type of Audit

Approvals Valid expiry REMARKS

held
YES NO

Capability
List

List of
Certifying
Staff
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 2 of 12

1. Management Yes N N/A

0 O
1. Has the holder of the Certificate of Approval hold a current certificate
1
of Approval from the CAA?
1. Is the maintenance organisation approval displayed in a prominent
2 place,Generally accessible to the public at such holder’s principle place
of business?
1. Does the Maintenance Procedure Manualcontain a commitment
3 statement signed bythe accountable manager on behalf of the
organisation to comply with the airworthiness Requirements?
1. Does the manual state the names of the key management personnel and
4 Their positions?
1. Does the manual contain a current chart showing lines of
5 responsibility?
1. Does the manual contain a statement of the current duties and
6 Responsibilities of the key management positions? (
1. Is there full and efficient co-ordination between department and within
7 Departments in respect of airworthiness matters?
1. Is there an Accountable manager approved by the KCAA
8
REMARKS
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 3 of 12

2.0 Quality Management Yes N N/A

O
2.1 Is the quality system documented?
2.2 Has the organisation designated a person responsible for quality?
2.3 Can the organisation show evidence of an internal audit plan and of
Internal audits conducted?
2.4 Are the designated auditors involved in any day-to-day involvement
in the area that is to be audited?
2.5 Is there a corrective and preventive action procedure?
2.6 Is every non-compliance corrected and are actions taken to prevent
Recurrence of such non-compliance?
2.7 Have corrective action been taken on previous KCAA audits/
inspections Conducted and are actions taken to prevent recurrence of
such noncompliance?
2.8 Is there a procedure for management review and overview?
2.9 Are appropriate actions decided at management reviews documented
and implemented to maintain an adequate level of conformance to
Airworthiness requirements?
2.10 Does the AMO have an internal audit and surveillance program that
ensures Compliance with regulatory requirements and customer
specifications?
2.11 Does the AMO only perform work for which it’s authorized / rated
for on the KCAA Issued Operations Specification?
2.12 Do production and quality staff have unrestricted access to the MPM
and QM
2.13 Does the AMO have a process by which to approve and oversee
contracted service vendors?
2.14 Does the AMO have procedures to ensure that work performed by a
contracted vendor complies with work order requirements?
2.15 Does the AMO have a procedure for reporting defects or unairworthy
conditions?
2.16 Does the AMO maintain current rosters of management, inspection,
return to service, and supervisory personnel?
2.17 Does the AMO have on file an employment summary for all staff
required to be listed on a roster?
2.18 Does the AMO have a receiving inspection system?
2.19 Does the AMO maintain traceability certification on all parts and raw
material?
2.20 Does the AMO have a system for the control of Quality Control
Inspection stamps?
REMARKS
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 4 of 12

3.0 TRAINING Yes N N/A

O
3.1 Has a procedure or plan for maintaining the competence of personnel
been established? and
Does the AMO maintain the competence of its personnel?
3.2 Are personnel in technical departments of sufficient numbers and
experience to plan, perform, supervise and inspect the work and have
they been given the appropriate authority
3.3 Is there a procedure for the keeping of technical records of personnel
for a period of two years?
3.4 Are all the ratings supported by qualified AMEs?
(Check ratings on AMO license and capability list)
3.5 Does the AMO have a documented training program to address the
continuous training requirements?
3.6 Is formal and On-The-Job training documented?
3.7 Are the AMO training records retained for a minimum of two years
after the person leaves the company?
REMARKS
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 5 of 12

4.0 TECHNICAL DATA CONTROL Yes N N/A

O
4.1 Are there established procedures for controlling and ensuring the
currency status of technical data used?
4.2 Is all retained technical data adequately stored and protected?
4.3 When applicable, are sufficient devices available for viewing
electronic and photographic technical data?
4.4 Is the organisation enrolled to receive amendments for all
airworthiness data required to support its approvals?
4.5 If the organisation depends on customer or other sources for
airworthiness data, is this arrangement effective?
4.6 Does the organisation hold the latest documentation? (Check
documentation holding list with manufacturer’s revision status list)
4.7 Is there evidence that the amendments are received, are up to date and
are correctly embodied? (Check library documents with the
documentation holding list and method of embodiment.)
4.8 Is the further distribution of documents by the library satisfactory
(where applicable)?
4.9 Is the information (amendments) brought to the attention of the
persons who need to use it?
4.10 Does the AMO have a complete set of ADs affecting the products
supported and do the personnel know how to use this?
REMARKS

5.0 TOOL & TEST EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION Yes N N/A

 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 6 of 12

O
5.1 Does the manual describe or make reference to the equipment
necessary to perform adequately all functions appropriate to the
ratings required?
5.2 Does the manual describe or refer to procedures for the method in
which special tools and equipment are used?
5.3 Does the organisation have the necessary equipment to support its
ratings (capability)?
5.4 Is an up to date inventory of tools and equipment available?
5.5 Are the tools and equipment marked to identify ownership?
5.6 Is the system for the control of tools and equipment satisfactory?
5.7 Has a procedure been established to control and, where necessary,
calibrate tools and other equipment at a frequency and to a standard
to ensure serviceability, accuracy and traceability and is this
documented in the manual of procedure?
5.8 Are calibration records and verification standards kept for at least
two years?
5.9 Does the AMO have a procedure that assigns Tool & Test
Equipment Calibration program responsibilities to a specific person
by title?
5.10 Does the AMO operate a procedure to prevent out-of-service or
calibration due tools & equipment from being used?
5.11 Does the AMO have a procedure for controlling the calibration of
personal tools/equipment?
5.12 Do calibration records:
Show date of calibration?
Identify individual or vendor that performed the calibration?
Show calibration due date?
Contain a copy of the calibration certificate?
Record details of adjustments and repairs?
Show the P/N and S/N of the standard used to perform the
calibration?
REMARKS

6.0 HOUSING AND FACILITIES Yes N N/A

O
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 7 of 12

6.1 Does the AMO have adequate facilities to house all the necessary
tooling, equipment, material, and parts to perform the work?
6.2 Does the AMO have adequate processes and equipment to protect the
parts, materials, and customer units from theft or damage?
6.3 Does the manual contain a statement regarding the standard of
cleanliness to be maintained at each maintenance facility?
Does the facility comply with the cleanliness standard as required?
REMARKS

7.0 STORAGE Yes N N/A

O
7.1 Are parts and material correctly identified and properly stored?
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 8 of 12

7.2 Does the stores have a process for the segregation and disposition of
unserviceable parts/material?
7.3 Are parts and material properly protected from damage and
deterioration?
7.4 Are flammable, toxic or volatile materials properly identified and
stored?
7.5 Are sensitive parts and equipment (oxygen parts, o-rings, etc.)
properly packaged, identified and stored to protect from damage?
7.6 Does the organisation purchase only from reputable suppliers?
(Check purchasing records)
If a system for supplier control has been implemented, does the
organisation comply with own procedures?
7.7 Does incoming inspection take place in accordance with own
procedures?
Is evidence of incoming inspection recorded?
Is a trace-ability number allocated and recorded?
7.8 Is access to the stores controlled?
7.9 Are all “lifed” items controlled by expiry date and on a first in first
out system?
7.10 Does incoming inspection take place in accordance with own
procedures?
Is evidence of incoming inspection recorded?
Is a trace-ability number allocated and recorded?
7.11 Can trace-ability be established for all items stored? (Check trace-
ability numbers availability, different batches being separated.)
(Trace some items in stores to their delivery documentation)
7.12 Is the control of U/S and repairable items acceptable?
REMARKS

8.0 PROCESS CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS Yes N N/A

O
8.1 Does the manual contain the latest scope of work, and does the
organisation limit itself to the approved scope of work?
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 9 of 12

8.2 Does the manual contain a current description of the relevant

documentation to be used and instructions for the completion thereof?
8.3 Does the organisation comply with all the procedures for completion
of records?
8.4 Can all work performed be traced to the person doing the work?
8.5 Does the system allow for an Inspector to counter sign upon
completion of the work performed?
8.6 Is reference to the manuals used entered on all maintenance work
sheets?
8.7 Is there a system to ensure AD and SB compliance?
Is this system used and effective?
Are recurrent ADs tracked?
8.8 Is there, where required, a method of tracking life limited parts on
products, And Is this method effective?
8.9 Are the inspection checklists used in compliance with requirements?
8.10 Are maintenance records kept as per the regulatory requirements
REMARKS

9.0 HANGAR Yes N N/A

O
9.1 Is the Maintenance Procedures Manual available and accessible by
every person who needs access?
9.2 Is the hangar kept neat and clean?
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 10 of 12

9.3 Are the personnel operating within their approval? (Check some
personal authorizations)
9.4 Is the maintenance documentation (inspection sheets) available at the
work station and in use? (Filled in as work progresses?)
9.5 Is the appropriate airworthiness data (Maintenance manuals, ADs,
SBs or other approved data) available at work station? (Check
revision status against library holding)
9.6 Is the method of controlling copied documents acceptable?
9.7 Is measuring equipment within calibration?
(Check some of equipment in hangar)
9.8 Are items removed from aircraft properly identified with respect to
source and status?
9.9 Are items removed from aircraft properly stored?
9.10 Have replacement spares been inspected and are these traceable to
source?
9.11 Are tools properly controlled?
(Check company tools and personal tools)
9.12 In respect of specialized equipment:
• Are operating instructions available?
• Are personnel trained to use this equipment?
9.13 Is the system for maintenance of hangar equipment in operation and
effective? Check the following where applicable:
• Fire fighting equipment
• Pressure equipment
• Overhead cranes and slings
• Aircraft jacks
REMARKS

10.0 workshop Yes N N/A

O
10.1 Is the controlling Manual available and accessible by every person
who needs access?
10.2 Is the hangar kept neat and clean?
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 11 of 12

10.3 Are the personnel operating within their approval? (Check some
personal authorizations)
10.4 Is the maintenance documentation (inspection sheets) available at
the work station and in use? (Filled in as work progresses?)
10.5 Is the appropriate airworthiness data (Maintenance manuals, ADs,
SBs or other approved data) available at work station? (Check
revision status
against library holding)
10.6 Is the method of controlling copied documents acceptable?
10.7 Is measuring equipment within calibration?
(Check some equipment in workshop)
10.8 Are items removed from aircraft properly identified with respect to
source and status?
10.9 Are items removed from aircraft properly stored?
10.1 Have replacement spares been inspected and are these traceable to
0 source?
10.1 Are tools properly controlled?
1 (Check company tools and personal tools)
10.1 Is every test bench within calibration? (Where applicable)
2 Are operating instructions available?
Are personnel trained to use this equipment?
10.1 Is the system for maintenance of hangar equipment in operation and
3 effective? Check the following where applicable:
• Fire fighting equipment
• Pressure equipment
• Overhead cranes and slings
• Aircraft jacks
REMARKS
 Form №: SL/QMS/1
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR EVALUATION Issue Date: 01 Sep 16
CHECKLIST Revision: 01
Page 12 of 12

This evaluation has been carried out by the undersigned on the ________ day of ____________
20____ who [approve / do not approve] ………………as a contracted AMO for Safarilink. I further
approve its inclusion in the AOC list of contracted AMO’s.

Name ………………………………………..Quality Manager-Engineering

Date…………………………………………

Recommendation

I …………………………being the Director of Maintenance for Safarilink do hereby recommend that

a maintenance contract be entered between Safarilink and the Contracted AMO.

Name ……………………………………….. Director of Maintenance

Date…………………………………………