Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Optimization of Extraction and Enrichment of Phenolics From Pomegranate (Punica Granatum L.) Leaves
Optimization of Extraction and Enrichment of Phenolics From Pomegranate (Punica Granatum L.) Leaves
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) leaves, as byproducts, are rich sources of phenolic compounds and
Received 1 May 2012 possess strong antioxidant activities. The aim of the present study is to optimize the extraction and
Received in revised form 21 June 2012 enrichment conditions of phenolics from pomegranate leaves. Firstly, four solvents (water, 50% methanol,
Accepted 21 June 2012
50% ethanol and 50% acetone) were used to assess the effect of solvent polarity on the extraction yield
and total phenolics content in extracts. Then, the response surface methodology based on three-level,
Keywords:
three-variable Box–Behnken design was used to optimize and evaluate three independent variables:
Phenolics
solvent concentration (25–50–75%), temperature (40–60–80 ◦ C) and extraction time (20–40–60 min) on
Antioxidant
Pomegranate leaf
the extraction yield and total phenolics content. Thereafter, the macroporous resin chromatography was
Macroporous resin used to enrich the phenolics in the crude extract and the resin types, pH values of samples and elution
Response surface methodology solvent, and the concentration of elution solvent were optimized based on the absorption and desorp-
Ellagic acid tion capacity of phenolics. Finally, the optimum conditions of extraction and enrichment were selected:
the highest temperature (80 ◦ C), the longest extraction time (60 min) and 61% ethanol solvent concen-
tration for extraction; HPD-100 macroporous resin for chromatography, pH 2.0 for absorption sample
solution, and 50% ethanol with pH 2.0 as desorption solvent. The extraction and enrichment process
established here can be easily and effectively achieved, and the content of phenolics in the resulting
extracts can reach 669.35 ± 19.50 mg GAE/g. Moreover, DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging abilities were
significantly increased in the resulting extracts. This is the first time to study the enrichment of phenolics
with macroporous resin chromatography from pomegranate leaves.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0926-6690/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.031
588 C. Wang et al. / Industrial Crops and Products 42 (2013) 587–594
so forth. However, all these methods have similar disadvantages, coefficients. A multiple regression analysis was applied to obtain
including long time taking, large amount of organic solvent an empirical model that relates the response measured to the
consuming and low recoveries (Zhang et al., 2009). Recently, independent variables. The second-order response function for the
macroporous resins, with durable non-polar, middle polar, or polar experiments was predicted by the following equation:
macroporous polymers (Zhang et al., 2009), have been successfully
applied to the separation and enrichment of bioactive components Yn = ˛0 + ˛1 · C + ˛2 · T + ˛3 · t + ˛11 · C 2 + ˛22 · T 2 + ˛33 · t 2
from many natural products, as an efficient method with a mod- +˛12 · C · T + ˛13 · C · t + ˛23 · T · t
erate purification effect, high absorption capacity, low operating
costs, low solvent consumption, and easy regeneration (Zhao et al., where Yn is the measured responses, ˛0 is the intercept term, ˛1 ,
2007; Silva et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2007). In this study, to avoid the ˛2 and ˛3 are linear coefficients, ˛11 , ˛22 and ˛33 are quadratic
toxic organic solvents used in conventional separation techniques coefficients, ˛12 , ˛13 and ˛23 are interaction coefficients, T, C, and t
such as gel and high-speed counter-current chromatographic sep- are the three independent variables coded at three levels −1 (lower
aration process and to increase the safety of the process (Zhao et al., limit), 0 (central point) and +1 (upper limit) as shown in Table 1.
2011), the absorption and desorption on macroporous resins were
utilized for the enrichment of phenolics from pomegranate leaves. 2.4. Enrichment
The present study focused on the optimization of extraction
and enrichment of phenolics with high antioxidant capacities from 2.4.1. Static absorption and desorption tests
pomegranate leaves, which has not yet been reported so far. In In order to get the most appropriate type of macroporous resin
extraction process, RSM was used to optimize three independent for enrichment of phenolics from pomegranate leaves, five different
variables including temperature, solvent composition and polar- types of resins were tested, including ADS-17, AB-8, D-101, HPD-
ity, and extracting time. For enrichment of phenolics, macroporous 826 and HPD-100, whose physical properties were summarized
resin chromatography was used to separate the crude extracts into in Table 2. After pretreated and activated according to the man-
four fractions with different phenolic contents and different antiox- ufacturer’s recommendation, 1.0 g (dry weight) resins were put
idant capacities. into a flask with a lid, then 40 mL crude pomegranate leaf extracts
(4.17 mg/mL) were added for absorption with shaking (200 rpm) for
2. Materials and methods 12 h at 25 ◦ C. After reaching absorption equilibrium, all the resins
were washed with 100 mL distilled water, and then transferred to
2.1. Raw materials and reagents another flask with 40 mL ethanol–water (60:40, v/v) solutions for
desorption with shaking (200 rpm) for 12 h at 25 ◦ C.
Pomegranate (P. granatum L.) leaves were collected after har- To study the effects of the initial sample solution pH on absorp-
vest of fruits in Beijing of China in October, 2010. The leaves tion capacity and the elution solvent pH on desorption capacity, a
were washed with distilled water and air-dried till equilibrium series of solutions with pH values ranged from 2 to 9 were tested.
humidity, then ground and transferred to darkness for further
use. Macroporous resins (ADS-17, AB-8, D-101, HPD-826 and HPD- 2.4.2. Capacities and ratios of absorption and desorption
100) were bought from Cangzhou Bonchem Co., Ltd., China. Other The absorption and desorption properties of different resins for
chemicals and reagents, unless specialized, were purchased from phenolics are quantified with the following equations.
Sigma–Aldrich, Inc.
C0 Ce C0 Ce
Absorption : Qe = ·E = × 100%
2.2. Solvent extraction W C0
Table 1
Three level Box–Behnken experimental design for pomegranate leaf extraction.
Y1 , extraction yield (%); Y2 , total phenolic content in extracts (g GAE/100 g); Y3 , phenolic content in pomegranate leaves (g GAE/100 g); SD, standard deviation; Sig., model
significance.
I was eluted with distilled water, Fr. II was obtained after elut- and left to stand for 20 min at room temperature in the dark, and
ing with 20% ethanol, then Fr. III and Fr. IV were yield with 50% then the absorbance was read at 517 nm. The RSA was determined
and 80% ethanol as mobile phase, respectively. All the fractions as %RSA = 100 (Ablank − Asample )/Ablank , where Asample and Ablank is
obtained were evaporated, lyophilized and finally stored at −20 ◦ C the absorbance of the extract solution and control solution, respec-
in darkness for further analysis. tively. The Trolox equivalent of the extracts (TRE) was calculated
and expressed as mmol Trolox equivalent (TRE) per g extract on
2.5. Determination of total phenolics dried basis.
The content of the total phenolics in pomegranate leaf extracts 2.6.2. ABTS radical scavenging activity
was estimated using a modified Folin–Ciocalteu method as The free radical scavenging activity using ABTS radical was also
described by Wolfe et al. (2008). Briefly, 0.5 mL of deionized water carried out according to the method of Alasalvar et al. (2009).
and 0.125 mL of diluted pomegranate leaf extracts (0.5 mg/mL) Briefly, an ABTS solution (7 mM) was mixed with potassium per-
were added into a brown volumetric flask. Folin Ciocalteu reagent sulfate (140 mM) with a ratio of 62.5:1 for 16 h in the darkness at
(0.125 mL) was subsequently added to the flask and allowed to room temperature to produce ABTS radical cation (ABTS+ ) stock
react for 6 min. Then, 1.25 mL of 7% sodium carbonate solution was solutions. The ABTS+ stock solution was diluted with ethanol
transferred to the flask, and then the mixture was diluted to 3 mL to an absorbance of 0.70 at 734 nm as a working solution. An
with deionized water. The absorbance was recorded after 90 min aliquot (0.15 mL) of aqueous solution containing 10–80 g/mL of
at 760 nm. The measurement was compared to a standard curve pomegranate leaf extract or fraction was mixed thoroughly with
of gallic acid concentrations and expressed as milligrams of gal- the ABTS+ solution (2.85 mL) and after 6–10 min in the darkness
lic acid equivalents (GAE) per 100 g extract (on a dried basis) ± SD at room temperature; the absorbance was read at 734 nm. The
(standard deviation) for triplicate extracts. radical-scavenging activity (RSA) for DPPH and ABTS radicals was
calculated as %RSA = 100 (A0 − As )/A0 , where As is the absorbance of
2.6. Antioxidant activity the extract solution and A0 is the absorbance of a control solution
prepared without extracts. The Trolox equivalent of the extracts
2.6.1. DPPH radical scavenging activity (TRE) was calculated and expressed as mmol Trolox equivalent
The DPPH radical scavenging activities (RSA) of the crude (TRE) per g extract on dried basis.
extracts and four fractions were assessed using a method described
by Alasalvar et al. (2009). Briefly, aqueous solutions (0.1 mL) of the 2.7. HPLC analysis
crude extracts or fractions with concentration 40–320 g/mL were
mixed with 0.25 mL of freshly prepared DPPH solution (1 mM in A Shimadzu HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a SPD-
methanol) and 2 mL ethanol. The mixture was shaken vigorously M20A ultraviolet detector and a SIL-20AC TH autosampler coupled
Table 2
Physical properties of the 5 macroporous resins used.
Name Particle diameter (mm) Surface area (m2 /g) Average pore diameter (nm) Polarity
with an analytical software (LC Solution-Release 1.23SP1) were et al. (2006), who studied effect of the use of water and different
applied to figure out the chromatographic profiles difference of organic solvents such as acetone, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF),
the pomegranate extracts and fractions, which could reflect the ethanol or methanol on the total polyphenol content and antiox-
chemical components profiles of them. A 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., idant activity of the black tea and mate tea, and found that 50%
5 m, Eclipse XDB-C18 (Agilent) column was used, the column acetone showed the highest polyphenol content for mate tea, 50%
thermostat was set at 30 ◦ C, and the mobile phase was 0.2% (v:v) ethanol extract from mate tea and 50% acetone from black tea had
phosphoric acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B) at a total flow rate the greatest antioxidant activity. It was obvious that solvent with
of 1 mL/min. Elution gradient was 15–25% B (0–25 min), 25–42% B different polarity had significant effect on polyphenol content and
(25–35 min), 42–50% B (35–50 min), and the eluate was detected antioxidant activity, and it showed that there is a high correlation
at 254 nm. Also, ellagic acid was used as a standard and the con- between phenolic content and antioxidant activity of pomegranate
tent of it in different extracts were determined. Each extract was leaf extract.
centrifuged, filtered through a 0.45 m nylon filter and analyzed Since acetone and ethanol aqueous solvents showed the highest
three times directly by HPLC running. After each run, the column extraction yield, phenolics content and antioxidant activities, and
was equilibrated for 10 min under initial conditions. no significant difference was observed between them, both of them
would be the most appropriate solvent for phenolics extraction.
2.8. Statistical analysis However, ethanol was generally recognized as safe, therefore, it
was considered to be the best in the four solvents assessed in this
Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA (two-tailed study.
Student’s t-tests) of Microsoft Excel Statistical Software (Microsoft
Office Excel 2007), and statically significant differences were con- 3.2. Optimization of extraction condition
sidered when p < 0.05. Correlations were determined using linear
regression on log-transformed data. To assess the effects of three independent variables including
extraction time (t), temperature (T), and ethanol concentration (C)
3. Results and discussion on three dependent variables, which reflect the extraction effi-
ciencies of phenolics from pomegranate leaves, RSM was applied,
3.1. Effects of solvents on extraction of phenolics and the coefficients R2 , adjusted R2 , standard deviation (SD) and
model significance (Sig.) were shown in Table 1. Significant models
The extraction yield and total phenolics in pomegranate were found for all the three dependent variables. Multiple regres-
leaves using different solvents, including water, 50:50 (v/v) sion coefficients were determined by the least-squares technique
methanol/water, 50:50 (v/v) ethanol/water and 50:50 (v/v) ace- in order to predict quadratic polynomial models for the tested
tone/water, were shown in Table 3. It is clear that acetone/water response variables and the regression equations were obtained as
and ethanol/water showed the highest extraction yield and following:
Y1 = −36.82500 + 0.98525 · T + 0.22180 · C + 0.87350 · t + 4.20000E − 003 · T · C − 5.12500E − 003 · T · t + 3.50000E − 003 · C · t − 3.95000E − 003 · T 2 − 5.88800E − 003 · C 2 − 6.32500E − 003 · t 2
Y2 = +20.33625 + 0.25386 · T + 0.17321 · C + 0.059950 · t + 6.20000E − 004 · T · C − 1.35625E − 003 · T · t + 1.00500E − 003 · C · t − 7.33750E − 004 · T 2 − 2.50960E − 003 · C 2 + 4.72500E − 004 · t 2
Y3 = −14.76875 + 0.33200 · T + 0.14265 · C + 0.28856 · t + 2.06000E − 003 · T · C − 1.65000E − 003 · T · t + 1.57500E − 003 · C · t − 1.06563E − 003 · T 2 − 3.15800E − 003 · C 2 − 1.98438E − 003 · t 2
phenolics content based on both dry weight leaves and Fig. 2 shows the response surfaces for extraction yield
extracts. Water exhibited almost the same extraction yields with (Y1 , 16.2–44.8%), phenolics content based on both dry weight
methanol/water, but with significantly lower phenolics contents. of the extract (Y2 , 34.16–42.59 g GAE/100 g) and leaves (Y3 ,
The results obtained appears to differ from those reported by 5.55–19.27 g GAE/100 g) in function of temperature, ethanol con-
Kaneria et al. (2011), who measured the extraction yield from centration and extraction time, respectively. Y1 increased with
pomegranate leaves and stems using five different solvents includ- increasing of the temperature (below 80 ◦ C) and the extraction
ing petroleum ether, toluene, ethyl acetate, acetone, and water, time (less than 60 min). Long time heating might make pheno-
and found that the yield was maximum in water, followed by lics dissolve and diffuse quickly and thoroughly. The extraction
acetone, while the total phenolics content in extracts of acetone yield increased with increasing of ethanol concentration in the
(40 g GAE/100 g extract) and water (22 g GAE/100 g) were similar range from 25% to 60%, while decreased when above 60%. Simi-
to the present study. lar findings were reported by Vázquez et al. (2012), who observed
Free radical scavenging ability (RSA) of extracts obtained using that the highest extraction yield of chestnut burs occurred when
various solvents were evaluated with the change of absorbance ethanol concentration was approximately 65%, then the yield
caused by the reduction of DPPH and ABTS+ radicals. The more decreased with increasing of ethanol concentration. The maximum
rapidly the absorbance changes, the more potent the antioxi- yield (46.683%) predicted by the model was achieved at 80 ◦ C,
dant activity of the extract presents in terms of its hydrogen 61% ethanol and 60 min. Similar to Y1 , Y2 and Y3 increased with
atom-donating capacity (Alasalvar et al., 2009). The percentage increasing of the temperature (below 80 ◦ C), time (less than 60 min)
scavenging activity of each extract against DPPH and ABTS+ were and ethanol concentration (below 60%), whereas at concentration
shown in Fig. 1. It was obvious that all four different solvent extracts above 60%, both Y2 and Y3 decreased with increasing of the ethanol
of pomegranate leaf extracts exhibited great DPPH and ABTS+ rad- concentration. Predicted by the model, the maximum Y2 (42.668%)
ical scavenging activities, and both the DPPH and ABTS+ radical and Y3 (19.991%) were both located at 80 ◦ C, 61% ethanol, 60 min.
scavenging activity of water extract was lower than the others. Since the best conditions for Y1 , Y2 and Y3 were the same, the opti-
In Fig. 1A, the extracts of 50% acetone and 50% ethanol had the mum conditions for extraction was selected as 80 ◦ C, 61% ethanol
greatest DPPH RSA, followed by 50% methanol extract and water and 60 min.
extract. In Fig. 1B, the extracts of 50% acetone, 50% ethanol and
50% methanol had the similar ABTS RSA, and water extract pre- 3.3. Macroporous resins selection
sented lowest antioxidant activity. These results indicated that
both the DPPH RSA and ABTS RSA decreased with the increase of Macroporous resin chromatography was used to enrich and sep-
solvent polarity, which was similar to the trends of total pheno- arate the phenolics of pomegranate leaf extracts. To obtain the
lic content. These results agree with those reported by Turkmen most appropriate resins with the best absorption and desorption
C. Wang et al. / Industrial Crops and Products 42 (2013) 587–594 591
Table 3
Extraction yield and phenolics contents in crude extracts and pomegranate leaves.
Extraction yield (%) 34.8 ± 0.8A 34 ± 0.35A 39.53 ± 0.58B 40.87 ± 1.50B
PC in extracts (g GAE/100 g) 25.97 ± 0.57A 37.08 ± 0.54B 39.89 ± 0.58C 40.23 ± 1.2C
PC in leaves (g GAE/100 g) 9.04 ± 0.4A 12.61 ± 0.07B 15.77 ± 0.3C 16.44 ± 0.87C
A,B,C,D
In each line, different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05). PC, phenolics content; GAE, gallic acid equivalent.
Fig. 1. DPPH radical scavenging activity (DPPH RSA) (A) and ABTS radical scavenging activity (ABTS RSA) (B) of pomegranate leaf extracts.
Fig. 2. Response surfaces for extraction yield (Y1 ), phenolics content in extracts (Y2 ) and phenolics content in leaves (Y3 ) in function of ethanol concentration, temperature
and time.
592 C. Wang et al. / Industrial Crops and Products 42 (2013) 587–594
Fig. 3. Effect of different macroporous resins on capacities (A) and ratios (B) of absorption and desorption of phenolics.
capacities, five types of macroporous resins with different physical these results, the lowest pH of sample and elution solutions were
properties were assessed and the results were shown in Fig. 3. It selected for absorption and desorption.
is indicated that the absorption capacities of different resins corre-
lated with their physical properties such as polarity and surface
area. The nonpolar resins (HPD-100 and D-101) and the weak- 3.5. Fractionation of pomegranate leaf extracts
polar resin (AB-8) have better absorption and desorption capacities
than the middle-polar resins (HPD-826 and ADS-17), indicating After HPD-100 macroporous resin chromatography, the crude
that there might be more nonpolar phenolics than polar pheno- extracts of pomegranate leaves were fractionated into four parts:
lics in pomegranate leaves. Therefore, HPD-100 was selected as Fr. I eluted with water, Fr. II with 20% ethanol, Fr. III with 50%
the best one with the highest absorption and desorption capacities, ethanol and Fr. IV with 80% ethanol successively. The transfer ratios
followed by D101, AB-8, HPD-826 and ADS-17. of both extracts and phenolics in each fraction were presented in
Table 4. It shows that about 68.34% of the crude extract was trans-
3.4. Effects of pH on the absorption and desorption capacities ferred to Fr. III, while over 80% of the phenolics in the crude extracts
were transferred to this fraction. Therefore, the phenolics were
The pH plays an important role in absorption and desorption significantly enriched in Fr. III, which was about 1.72-fold higher
processes, because the ionization of solutes can be influenced by than the crude extract. Also, as shown in Fig. 5, Fr. III exhibited
pH, thus affecting the absorption affinity between solutes and solu- the highest DPPH RSA and ABTS RSA, which was much higher than
tions (Fu et al., 2006). The effects of initial sample solution pH on the other fractions and crude extracts. Although significant differ-
the absorption capacity and the eluting solution pH on the desorp- ence between Fr. II, Fr. IV and crude extracts was not observed
tion capacity were shown in Fig. 4. It shows that both the absorption in phenolics contents, it was found in DPPH RSA and ABTS RSA
and desorption capacities decreased with increasing of pH of initial between them. Fr. II showed the highest DPPH RSA and ABTS RSA,
sample solutions and elution solutions. Especially, absorption and followed by the crude extracts and Fr. IV, and Fr. I showed both
desorption capacities decreased sharply when the pH was above 6. the lowest DPPH RSA and ABTS RSA, indicating that their contents
Similar results were reported by Fu et al. (2006), who found that of bioactive phenolics with antioxidant activities were different.
the absorption capacities of vitexin and isovitexin decreased with Therefore, macroporous resin chromatography effectively enriched
the increase of pH. The reason for these sharp decreases is that the phenolics, especially the phenolics with antioxidant activities
the phenolic hydroxyl groups in phenolics dissociated to form H+ in the extracts. Similar results were reported by Zhao et al. (2011),
and their corresponding anions with increasing of pH, thus resulted who used macroporous resin chromatography to enrich antioxi-
in the decrease of absorption and desorption capacities. Based on dant phenolics in chestnut burs effectively.
Table 4
Total phenolics content in crude and fractionated extracts.
PC in extracts (mg GAE/g) 389.03 ± 19.87B 105.46 ± 3.77A 419.41 ± 20.72B 669.35 ± 19.50C 394.96 ± 0.42B
Transfer ratio of extracts (%) 9.87 12.68 68.34 9.10
Transfer ratio of phenolics (%) 1.97 9.55 82.13 6.45
A,B,C,D
In each line with different letters means significant differences (p < 0.05). PC, phenolics content.
Fig. 5. DPPH radical scavenging activity (DPPH RSA) (A) and ABTS radical scavenging activity (ABTS RSA) (B) of fractionated extracts of pomegranate leaves.
report (Han et al., 2006). Further study is still needed to identify the
component responsible for antioxidant activities in Fr. III.
4. Conclusions
was 50% ethanol with pH 2.0. Also, the resulting extracts pos- Han, D.H., Lee, M.J., Kim, J.H., 2006. Antioxidant and apoptosis-inducing activities of
sessed significantly increased phenolics enrichment thus improved ellagic acid. Anticancer Res. 26 (5A), 3601–3606.
Huang, T.H., Peng, G., Kota, B.P., Li, G.Q., Yamahara, J., Roufogalis, B.D., Li, Y.H., 2005.
antioxidant activities. Although well known for its antioxidant Pomegranate flower improves cardiac lipid metabolism in a diabetic rat model:
activities, ellagic acid seemed not play the dominant role in DPPH role of lowering circulating lipids. Br. J. Pharmacol. 145, 767–774.
RSA. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on Hora, J.J., Maydew, E.R., Lansky, E.P., Dwivedi, C., 2003. Chemopreventive effects of
pomegranate seed oil on skin tumor development in CD1 mice. J. Med. Food. 6,
the extraction optimization of phenolics using response surface 157–161.
methodology, also the first time to study the enrichment of phe- Kaneria, M.J., Bapodara, M.B., Chanda, S.V., 2011. Effect of extraction techniques and
nolics with macroporous resin chromatography from pomegranate solvents on antioxidant activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) leaf and
stem. Food Anal. Methods, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12161-011-9257–6.
leaves.
Lan, J.Q., Lei, F., Hua, L., Wang, Y.G., Xing, D.M., Du, L.J., 2009. Transport behavior of
ellagic acid of pomegranate leaf tannins and its correlation with total cholesterol
Acknowledgments alteration in HepG2 cells. Biomed. Chromatogr. 23 (5), 531–536.
Lei, F., Zhang, X.N., Wang, W., Xing, D.M., Xie, W.D., Su, H., Du, L.J., 2007. Evidence
of anti-obesity effects of the pomegranate leaf extract in high-fat diet induced
The study was financially supported by the Fundamental obese mice. Int. J. Obes. 31, 1023–1029.
Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (JD2010-2), Silva, E.M., Pompeu, D.R., Larondelle, Y., Rogez, H., 2007. Optimisation of
the absorption of polyphenols from Inga edulis leaves on macroporous
Forestry Commonweal Programs (201004008), and Ph.D. Programs
resins using an experimental design methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 53,
Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20100014120017). 274–280.
Sun, A., Sun, Q., Liu, R., 2007. Preparative isolation and purification of flavone
compounds from Sophora japonica L. by high-speed counter-current chromatog-
References raphy combined with macroporous resin column separation. J. Sep. Sci. 30,
1013–1018.
Afaq, F., Saleem, M., Krueger, C.G., Reed, J.D., Mukhtar, H., 2005. Anthocyanin and Szydłowska-Czerniak, A., Trokowski, K., Szłyk, E., 2011. Optimization of extraction
hydrolyzable tannin-rich pomegranate fruit extract modulates MAPK and NF- conditions of antioxidants from sunflower shells (Helianthus annuus L.) before
kappaB pathways and inhibits skin tumorigenesis in CD-1 mice. Int. J. Cancer and after enzymatic treatment. Ind. Crops Prod. 33, 123–131.
113, 423–433. Turkmen, N., Sari, F., Velioglu, Y.S., 2006. Effects of extraction solvents on con-
Alasalvar, C., Karamać, M., Kosińska, A., Rybarczyk, A., Shahidi, F., Amarowicz, R., centration and antioxidant activity of black and black mate tea polyphenols
2009. Antioxidant activity of hazelnut skin phenolics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, determined by ferrous tartrate and Folin–Ciocalteu methods. Food Chem. 99
4645–4650. (4), 835–841.
Chidambara Murthy, K.N., Jayaprakasha, G.K., Singh, R.P., 2002. Studies on antiox- Vázquez, G., Fernández-Agulló, A., Gómez-Castro, C., Freire, M.S., Antorrena,
idant activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel extract using in vivo G., González-Álvarez, J., 2012. Response surface optimization of antioxi-
models. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 4791–4795. dants extraction from chestnut (Castanea sativa) bur. Ind. Crops Prod. 35,
Dudonné, S., Vitrac, X., Coutière, P., Woillez, M., Mérillon, J.-M., 2009. Comparative 126–134.
study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of Wolfe, K.L., Kang, X.M., He, X.G., Dong, M., Zhang, Q.Y., Liu, R.H., 2008. cellular antiox-
industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP SOD and ORAC assays. J. Agric. Food idant activity of common fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 8418–8426.
Chem. 57, 1768–1774. Zhao, S., Liu, J.Y., Chen, S.Y., Shi, L.L., Liu, Y.J., Ma, C., 2011. Antioxidant potential of
El-Shennawy, A., Ali, E., El-Komy, W., Fahmy, Z., El-Wakel, E., 2010. Evaluation of polyphenols and tannins from burs of Castanea mollissima blume. Molecules 16,
ponytail antiparasitic activity of pomegranate juice, peels and leaves against 8590–8600.
Giardia lamblia. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 14, S84. Zhao, Y., Chen, B., Yao, S., 2007. Separation of 20 (S)-protopanaxdiol type gin-
Fu, Y.J., Zu, Y.G., Liu, W., Hou, C.L., Chen, L.Y., Li, S.M., Shi, X.G., Tong, M.H., 2006. senosides and 20 (S)-protopanaxtriol type ginsenosides with the help of
Preparative separation of vitexin and isovitexin from pigeonpea extracts with macroporous resin absorption and microwave assisted desorption. Sep. Purif.
macroporous resins. J. Chromatogr. A 1139, 206–213. Technol. 52, 533–538.
Gil, M.I., Tomás-barberán, F.A., Hess-pierce, B., Kader, A.A., 2002. Antioxidant capac- Zhang, Z.F., Liu, Y., Luo, P., Zhang, H., 2009. Separation and purification of two
ities, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and vitamin C contents of nectarine, flavone glucuronides from Erigeron multiradiatus (Lindl.) benth with macrop-
peach, and plum cultivars from California. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 4976–5498. orous resins. J. Biomed. Biotechnol., http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/875629.