Effect of Initial Microstructure On Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of 0.12C Martensitic Steels During Quenching and Tempering
Effect of Initial Microstructure On Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of 0.12C Martensitic Steels During Quenching and Tempering
Effect of Initial Microstructure On Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of 0.12C Martensitic Steels During Quenching and Tempering
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-024-01226-1 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().
,- volV)
ORIGINAL PAPER
Abstract
The microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of a Fe–0.12C–0.2Si–1.6Mn–0.3Cr–0.0025B (wt.%) steel with
different initial microstructures, i.e., hot rolled (HR) and cold rolled–annealed (CRA), were studied through optical
microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, electron channeling contrast imaging, microhardness and room temperature
uniaxial tensile tests. After water quenching from 930 C to room temperature, a fully martensitic microstructure was
obtained in both as-quenched HR and CRA specimens, which shows a microhardness of 480 ± 5 HV, and no significant
difference in microstructure and microhardness was observed. Tensile test results show that the product of tensile
strength and total elongation (UTS 9 TE) of the as-quenched HR specimen, i.e., 24.1 GPa%, is higher than that of the as-
quenched CRA specimen, i.e., 18.9 GPa%. While, after being tempered at 300 C, the martensitic microstructures and
mechanical properties of the two as-quenched specimens change significantly due to the synergy role of the matrix phase
softening and the precipitation strengthening. Concerning the maximum UTS 9 TE, it is 18.9 GPa% obtained in the as-
quenched CRA one, while that is 24.4 GPa% obtained in the HR specimen after tempered at 300 C for 5 min.
123
Y.R. Wang et al.
transferring the steel sheet from the furnace to the hot Table 1 Chemical composition of studied steel (wt.%)
stamping mould for simultaneous forming and quenching
C Si Mn Cr B Fe
[10], has been developed. For example, the tensile strength
of 22MnB5 steel, after subjected to hot-rolling, cold-roll- 0.12 0.2 1.6 0.3 0.0025 Balance
ing, and annealing, showing a ferritic–pearlitic
microstructure, is approximately 600 MPa, while the ten-
sile strength can reach 1600 MPa after hot stamping [11]. martensitic dual-phase microstructures with different sizes,
The tensile strength together with the absorbed energy of morphology, and distribution of martensite by altering the
the hot stamping component was significantly enhanced. initial microstructures using heat treatment and thermo-
The hot stamping process was first applied to the impact- mechanical processing routes. Yan et al. [27] found that
resistant side members of the Swedish SAAB 9000 model initial microstructure has an impact on both microstructural
in the 1980s [12]. However, till now, the produced com- evolution and mechanical properties. Detailed information
ponents by the hot stamping process take only 15%–38% concerning the effect of initial microstructure on the as-
of the total amount of components in body-in-white [13] quenched and tempered microstructures and mechanical
due to the strength–ductility trade-off in steels. properties of low-carbon lath martensitic steels still needs
It is a historical issue to achieve a good combination of to be included.
ultra-high strength and toughness in steel. Lath martensitic Therefore, the purpose of present study is to investigate
steel containing less than 0.35 wt.% carbon, in general, was the effect of initial microstructure on the microstructure
widely used. In the past decades, considerable progress has evolution and the mechanical properties of low-carbon
been made in developing ultra-high strength steels in such steel. The as-quenched and tempered microstructure and
a low-carbon martensite [7, 14–18]. A significant body of mechanical properties of 0.12C (wt.%) steel with different
research on low-alloy high-strength steels has demon- initial microstructures were studied by using a combination
strated that the final microstructure of steel plays a crucial of optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy
role in determining its mechanical behavior. Meanwhile, (SEM), electron channeling contrast imaging (ECCI),
the strength and toughness of steels can be tuned by adding microhardness and room temperature uniaxial tensile tests.
trace elements, such as Nb, V, Ti, Mo, and W, to form The role of initial microstructure on the microstructure
dispersion of nano precipitates and refine prior austenite evolution and mechanical properties of lath martensitic
grains by pinning effect [15, 16, 19–22]. By adding Nb steel was also further discussed.
element, a 2000 MPa grade ultra-high strength steel
with the product of tensile strength and total elongation
(UTS 9 TE) * 17.7 GPa% has been developed by Liang 2 Materials and methods
et al. [15]. Furthermore, the optimal processing parameters
are also equally important. An Fe–Mn–Si–Nb alloyed steel The chemical compositions of the studied steel are listed in
with a UTS 9 TE, i.e., * 31.4 GPa%, has been produced Table 1. The alloy was made by vacuum induction melting
through a novel quenching–partitioning–tempering process and cast into an ingot. The forged ingot was cut into a
[17]. 100 mm 9 100 mm 9 L mm slab (L is the length of the
The microstructure of martensitic steel, such as mor- ingot). Then, the slab was homogenized at 1250 C for
phology, size, and type, is related to the processing 2.5 h and hot-rolled to 3.5 mm in thickness (hereafter
parameters and chemical composition, which determine the referred to as HR). The hot-rolled plate was then pickled
mechanical properties. The role of the initial microstruc- and cold-rolled to 1.5 mm with a thickness reduction of
ture of low-carbon lath martensitic steel on the subsequent 57.1%, after which it was annealed for 5 min at 750 C
as-quenched and tempered microstructure and mechanical (hereafter referred to as CRA).
properties has yet to receive attention. Luo et al. [23] The equilibrium phase fractions of the studied steel were
suggested that the substructure of martensite, including calculated using the Thermo-Calc software with the
packet, block, and lath, was refined when the size of prior TCFE12 database (see in Fig. 1) for a temperature range
austenite grains was decreased. Zhang et al. [24] found that from 0 to 1400 C, which was relevant for the solid phase
adding Nb into 42CrNiMoV bolt steel can significantly observation. The start temperature of austenization (Ac1)
refine the size of prior austenite grain and the corre- and finish temperature of austenization (Ac3) are 684 and
sponding as-quenched martensitic microstructure. Järvinen 823 C, respectively, as seen in Fig. 1a. From the detailed
et al. [25] suggested that the austenitization parameters and magnification of Fig. 1a, austenite can completely trans-
the initial microstructure of 22MnB5 steel influence the form into ferrite as the temperature drops below 684 C.
grain size and morphology of austenite and its mechanical When the temperature continues to decrease, various types
properties. Mirzadeh et al. [26] produced ferritic–
123
Effect of initial microstructure on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties…
Fig. 1 Equilibrium phase diagram (a) and detailed magnification in a (b) of studied steel
of precipitates gradually form. When the temperature Fig. 3 Schematic illustration of tensile test specimens and metallo-
decreases to 447, 401 and 334 C, the M2B, M7C3, and graphic specimens. ND—Normal direction
M23C6 carbides start to form, respectively. At 300 C, the
predominant precipitates are M7C3 (volume fraction of
1.06%), M23C6 (volume fraction of 0.48%), and M2B performed using SHIMADZU AG–X Plus (10 kN) with a
(volume fraction of 0.04%). specific crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and three speci-
Based on the calculated phase diagram, specimens with mens were used for each condition.
dimensions of 40 mm 9 25 mm (rolling direction The metallographic and microhardness test specimens
(RD) 9 transverse direction (TD)) were first cut from the were ground by SiC paper, mechanically polished with
HR and CRA plates by wire electrical discharge machining 0.5 lm diamond spray, and then etched in 4 vol.% Nital.
(Wire-EDM). The schematic of heat treatments is shown in The average grain size of ferrite and pearlite is calculated
Fig. 2. The specimens were austenitized at 930 C for using an intercept method, and the nano measurer software
5 min, followed by water quenching (hereafter referred to is used. For each condition, * 500 grains were taken into
as HR-Q and CRA-Q, respectively). Then, the as-quenched account for an accurate statistical effect. The microstruc-
specimens were tempered at 300 C for 5, 10, 30, 120, and ture observations were carried out by MODEL DM2000X
600 min, respectively, which were hereafter referred to as optical microscope and JEOL JSM-7800F field emission
HR/CRA-T 5, HR/CRA-T 10, HR/CRA-T 30, HR/CRA-T SEM, operating at 15 kV. The microhardness measure-
120, and HR/CRA-T 600, respectively, for easy discussion. ments were conducted under a constant loading condition
All the heat treatments were conducted using a GSL- using a load of 1.961 N for a dwell time of 15 s. An
1400X tube furnace. average value of 10 points for each specimen was taken,
The dog-bone tensile specimens were cut along with RD and the distance between neighboring indents was set
by Wire-EDM, as seen in Fig. 3. The tensile tests were longer than 150 lm to avoid interference.
123
Y.R. Wang et al.
Fig. 4 Variation of chemical composition in M2B (a), M7C3 (b), M23C6 carbides (c) and BCC and FCC with temperature (d)
123
Effect of initial microstructure on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties…
123
Y.R. Wang et al.
123
Effect of initial microstructure on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties…
4 Discussion
123
Y.R. Wang et al.
Fig. 12 Schematic of microstructure evolution in studied steels microstructure (fresh martensite, thicker black lines represent prior
during quenching and tempering of CRA (a–c) and HR (d–f). a, austenite grains); c, f tempered martensite obtained by long-term
d Initial microstructure (ferrite and pearlite); b, e as-quenched tempering
During the auto-tempering, the width of primarily formed obtained laths are coarser. Quantity studies have shown that
laths becomes coarse due to boundary migration and merg- the finer the initial grain size, the more potential nucleation
ing. The diffusion distance of carbon is also longer than the sites of the precipitate phase, and therefore the higher the
lath formed at the late stage, which is always regarded as the volume fraction of the precipitates forms in a short time [53].
more prone auto-tempering area, as shown in Fig. 6e, f. From SEM taken in randomly selected areas (Figs. 7 and 8
After being tempered for a short time, the as-quenched represent that of the CRA and the HR specimens, respec-
martensite has very high density dislocations, which pro- tively), it can be seen that the precipitates in the CRA
vides plenty of potential nucleation sites for the precipitate specimens occupy a larger volume fraction.
[49]. Then, a large number of dispersed precipitates are
rapidly formed at intra/inter laths. With the extension of the 4.2 Effect of initial microstructure on mechanical
tempering time, the size of the precipitates gradually grows, properties
which leads to the weakening of the pinning effect of the
precipitates, and the laths are also coarse [52]. The difference After quenching, full lath martensite is observed in both
in the initial microstructure of CRA and HR specimens CRA and HR specimens, showing a microhardness of
would inhabit the as-quenched microstructure, leading to 480 ± 5 HV. This is consistent with the earlier report on
microstructure differences, e.g., the density of dislocation steels with similar carbon content [36] and mainly depends
and solid solution of elements in the matrix phase. Then, on the carbon content rather than other alloying elements.
during the tempering, the microstructure evolution of After tempering at 300 C for various time, the micro-
martensite, including migration of various grain boundaries, hardness changing trend in these two specimens is roughly
nucleation, and growth of precipitates, are strongly related to the same. The microhardness decreases abruptly in the first
the as-quenched one, which is the main reason for the 5 min tempering and then keeps constant within a specific
microstructure difference in the CRA and HR specimens. range, i.e., from 480 ± 5 HV to 410 ± 5 HV (CRA) and
The schematic of microstructure evolution during the heat- 401 ± 8 HV (HR) as tempering time changes from 10 to
ing treatment is summarized in Fig. 12. In the final tempered 600 min. During the first 5 min tempering, the lattice dis-
microstructure, the volume fraction of the precipitates in the tortion is released, and the dislocation density is signifi-
CRA specimen is larger, and precipitates are evenly dis- cantly decreased due to the recovery of as-quenched
persed across the matrix, while the precipitates in the HR martensite [37, 53]. Thus, the microhardness and tensile
specimen appear to be primarily at lath boundaries, and the strength of the two specimens rapidly reduced for both the
123
Effect of initial microstructure on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties…
CRA and HR specimens. After tempering for 30 min, the Table 3 Precipitation contributions as a function of tempering time
microhardness of the CRA specimen is almost unchanged Tempering Diameter/ Shear Burgers Precipitation
due to the synergy precipitation strengthening and matrix time/min nm modulus/ vector/ strengthening/
softening. At the same time, the microhardness of the HR MPa nm MPa
specimen is slightly increased. With the prolonged tem-
0 1 8.3 9 104 0.248 173
pering time, the matrix softening and precipitation
600 34 8.3 9 104 0.248 690
strengthening reach an equilibrium condition, leading to a
stable microhardness for both specimens. It should be
noticed that the tensile strength of both types of specimens to 1158 ± 13 MPa (HR). When the tempering time is
decreases with the tempering time prolonging. prolonged to 120 min or even 600 min, the tensile strength
Unlike the microhardness, the tensile strength and total of CRA specimen decreases by 368–395 MPa, and the
elongation of CRA-Q specimens are slightly higher and elongation increases by 1.7%–5.7%. Meanwhile, the tensile
lower than those of the HR-Q specimen, respectively. This strength of HR specimen decreased by 349–370 MPa, and
may be caused by the combined effect of grain boundary the elongation increased by 2.3%–8.4%. The findings pave
strengthening [40] due to the fine substructure in the CRA the way for high-performance steel design by optimizing
specimen. When tempering at 300 C for various time, the the initial microstructure before quenching and tempering.
softening of the matrix leads to a decrease in the micro-
hardness, especially at the very early stage, owing to the
rapid release of internal stress and annihilation of high 5 Conclusions
mobility of dislocation [37]. This leads to a decrease in the
tensile strength and an increase in the total elongation. 1. The microstructure of as-quenched CRA and HR
Meanwhile, the supersaturated alloying elements will dif- specimens is fully martensite, showing a microhard-
fuse to the place with carbon segregation or defects to form ness of 480 ± 5 HV for both specimens, no matter the
carbides. The Ashby-Orowan model is adapted for cubic morphology and grain size of the initial microstructure.
polycrystalline materials with spherical precipitates and is The different features in microstructure between the
used to evaluate the precipitation strengthening, HR and CRA specimens are the size, morphology, and
1
! distribution of ferrite and pearlite, leading to a differ-
0:538Gbf 2 X
Drppt ¼ ln ð1Þ ence in the as-quenched microstructure.
X 2b
2. After tempering at 300 C for different time, a compet-
where Drppt is the amount of precipitation strengthening; itive process of precipitation strengthening and matrix
G is the shear modulus, with a value of 8.3 9 104 MPa; phase softening occurs. At 5 min tempering, the micro-
b is the magnitude of the Burgers vector taken by hardness of the HR and CRA specimens decreased
0.248 nm; f is the volume fraction of the precipitates; and rapidly due to the matrix softening during the very early
X is the diameter of the precipitates expressed in nm [54]. stage of the fast recovery, and at 10 min tempering, a
According to the equilibrium phase diagram as shown in large number of precipitates were nucleated at inter/intra
Fig. 1, the volume fractions of M2B, M7C3 and M23C6 laths. The microhardness of the CRA specimen
precipitates at 300 C are 0.04%, 1.06% and 0.48%, remained stable, while the microhardness of the HR
respectively. Thus, we assume that the volume fractions are specimen increased slightly. At 120 min tempering, the
0.79% (half of the equilibrium value) at the initial stage microhardness of the two specimens remained stable.
and 1.58% after tempering at 300 C for 600 min, 3. The mechanical properties of the studied steel can be
respectively. We assume that the initial size of precipitates tuned in an extensive range via initial microstructure
is 1 nm (at the very early stage of nucleation and growth, control together with tempering parameters. The
i.e., as-quenched condition), while that is about 34 nm after maximum UTS 9 TE, i.e., 18.9 GPa%, of the CRA
tempered at 300 C for 600 min according to the specimen, is obtained in the as-quenched specimen. In
microstructure observation. Thus, the strengthening con- contrast, for the HR specimen, that is 24.4 GPa% after
tribution by the precipitates varies in the range of being tempered at 300 C for 5 min.
173–690 MPa, as shown in Table 3. Therefore, with tem-
pering time prolonging, the size of precipitates gets coar- Acknowledgements This research was funded by the Chongqing
ser, as seen in Fig. 9, and the precipitation-strengthening Natural Science Foundation (No. CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1394),
Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China
effect weakens [37]. When tempering for 5 min, the tensile (Grant No. CYS22008), Open Project of State Key Laboratory of
strength of the two specimens decreases, i.e., from Advanced Special Steel, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced
1248 ± 1 to 1159 ± 28 MPa (CRA) and from 1176 ± 21 Ferrometallurgy, Shanghai University (SKLASS 2023-10) and the
123
Y.R. Wang et al.
Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. [25] H. Järvinen, M. Isakov, T. Nyyssönen, M. Järvenpää, P. Peura,
19DZ2270200), and the Open Project of the Large Casting and Mater. Sci. Eng. A 676 (2016) 109–120.
Forging Manufacturing Technology Engineering Center of Shanghai [26] H. Mirzadeh, M. Alibeyki, M. Najafi, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48
Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, State Key Labo- (2017) 4565–4573.
ratory of Vanadium and Titanium Resources Open Fund [27] S. Yan, X. Liu, T. Liang, Y. Zhao, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 712
(No. 2022P4FZG04A). (2018) 332–340.
[28] S. Morito, H. Tanaka, R. Konishi, T. Furuhara, T. Maki, Acta
Mater. 51 (2003) 1789–1799.
Declarations [29] B. Hutchinson, J. Hagström, O. Karlsson, D. Lindell, M. Torn-
berg, F. Lindberg, M. Thuvander, Acta Mater. 59 (2011)
Conflicts of interest Zi-yong Hou is a youth editorial board mem- 5845–5858.
ber for Journal of Iron and Steel Research International and was not [30] L. Morsdorf, E. Emelina, B. Gault, M. Herbig, C.C. Tasan, Acta
involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this arti- Mater. 205 (2021) 116521.
cle. The authors declare no conflict of interest. [31] L. Morsdorf, C.C. Tasan, D. Ponge, D. Raabe, Acta Mater. 95
(2015) 366–377.
[32] H.L. Cai, P. Chen, J.K. Oh, Y.R. Cho, D. Wu, H.L. Yi, Scripta
References Mater. 178 (2020) 77–81.
[33] Z. Hou, R.P. Babu, P. Hedström, J. Odqvist, Mater. Sci. Tech-
[1] E. Scharifi, T. Schade, A. Ademaj, S.V. Sajadifar, U. Weidig, T. nol. 36 (2020) 887–893.
Niendorf, K. Steinhoff, Steel Res. Int. 92 (2021) 2000633. [34] Y.M. Zhu, Q. Zhang, Q. Yuan, J.S. Guan, Y.B. Yang, G. Xu,
[2] H.X. Yin, Z.Z. Zhao, A.M. Zhao, X. Li, H.J. Hu, J.T. Liang, J. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 47 (2022) 9061–9073.
Iron Steel Res. Int. 22 (2015) 622–629. [35] Z.Y. Hou, R.P. Babu, P. Hedström, J. Odqvist, J. Mater. Sci. 53
[3] W. He, B.L. Wang, Y. Yang, Y.H. Zhang, L. Duan, Z.P. Luo, (2018) 6939–6950.
C.J. Song, Q.J. Zhai, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 25 (2018) 830–838. [36] Z. Hou, P. Hedström, Y. Xu, W. Di, J. Odqvist, ISIJ Int. 54
[4] M. Tisza, I. Czinege, Int. J. Light. Mater. Manuf. 1 (2018) (2014) 2649–2656.
229–238. [37] G. Krauss, Steel Res. Int. 88 (2017) 1700038.
[5] H. Karbasian, A.E. Tekkaya, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210 [38] F. Liu, K. Chen, C. Kang, Z. Jiang, S. Ding, J. Mater. Res.
(2010) 2103–2118. Technol. 19 (2022) 779–793.
[6] C.P. Couto, R.I. Revilla, R. Politano, I. Costa, Z. Panossian, I. De [39] W. Ding, T. Wu, L. Sun, C. Yan, X. Lu, X. Lei, Steel Res. Int.
Graeve, J.L. Rossi, H. Terryn, Corros. Sci. 190 (2021) 109673. 93 (2022) 2100627.
[7] W. Huang, H. Gu, Q. Liu, T. Si, Mater. Chem. Phys. 256 (2020) [40] A. Dutta, D. Ponge, S. Sandlöbes, D. Raabe, Mater. Sci. Forum
123729. 941 (2018) 198–205.
[8] Y.X. Qiao, Z.B. Zheng, H.K. Yang, J. Long, P.X. Han, J. Iron [41] B. Dou, H. Zhang, Y. Tao, Q.S. Ma, S. Guo, Tungsten 5 (2023)
Steel Res. Int. 30 (2023) 1463–1476. 189–197.
[9] K. Mori, P.F. Bariani, B.A. Behrens, A. Brosius, S. Bruschi, T. [42] A. Kostka, K. Tak, R. Hellmig, Y. Estrin, G. Eggeler, Acta
Maeno, M. Merklein, J. Yanagimoto, CIRP Ann. 66 (2017) Mater. 55 (2007) 539–550.
755–777. [43] Y.H. Yu, Z.D. Liu, Z. Liu, Z.Z. Chen, H.S. Bao, C. Zhang, Z.G.
[10] S.S. Li, H.W. Luo, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 28 (2021) Yang, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 30 (2023) 1279–1290.
741–753. [44] B. Hu, X. Tu, H. Luo, X. Mao, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 47 (2020)
[11] H. So, D. Faßmann, H. Hoffmann, R. Golle, M. Schaper, J. 131–141.
Mater. Process. Technol. 212 (2012) 437–449. [45] X. Liu, K.Y. Zhao, Y.H. Zhou, D. Ye, W. Jiang, Q.L. Yong, J.
[12] T. Taylor, A. Clough, Mater. Sci. Technol. 34 (2018) 809–861. Su, Adv. Mater. Res. 393–395 (2011) 440–443.
[13] I. Wróbel, A. Skowronek, A. Grajcar, Symmetry 14 (2022) 969. [46] M.A. Shtremel’, V.I. Lizunov, V.V. Shkatov, Met. Sci. Heat
[14] B. Hu, H. Luo, F. Yang, H. Dong, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 33 Treat. 21 (1979) 747–750.
(2017) 1457–1464. [47] N.T. Egorov, M.S. Podgaiskii, L.I. Razumova, Met. Sci. Heat
[15] J. Liang, H. Lu, L. Zhang, F. Li, R. Cao, K. Liu, H. Pan, H. Treat. 21 (1979) 861–865.
Teng, X. Li, A. Guo, Z. Zhao, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 801 (2021) [48] D. Ning, C.R. Dai, J.L. Wu, Y.D. Wang, Y.Q. Wang, Y. Jing, J.
140419. Sun, Mater. Charact. 176 (2021) 111111.
[16] Y.T. Lin, H.L. Yi, Z.Y. Chang, H.C. Lin, H.W. Yen, Front. [49] M.S. Mohsenzadeh, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 32 (2023) 164–169.
Mater. 7 (2020) 611390. [50] G. Badinier, C.W. Sinclair, X. Sauvage, X. Wang, V. Bylik, M.
[17] K. Zhang, P. Liu, W. Li, Z. Guo, Y. Rong, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Gouné, F. Danoix, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 638 (2015) 329–339.
619 (2014) 205–211. [51] T. Kohne, J. Fahlkrans, A. Stormvinter, E. Maawad, A.
[18] Y.J. Li, G. Yuan, L.L. Li, J. Kang, F.K. Yan, P.J. Du, D. Raabe, Winkelmann, P. Hedström, A. Borgenstam, Metall. Mater.
G.D. Wang, Science 379 (2023) 168–173. Trans. A 54 (2023) 1083–1100.
[19] J.B. Dong, K. Li, L.X. Gao, C.S. Li, Tungsten 5 (2023) 512–521. [52] Z. Liu, Z. Liu, X. Wang, C. Dong, Z. Chen, H. Bao, Mater. Res.
[20] Y. Zhang, C. Zhao, M. Sato, G. Miyamoto, T. Furuhara, ISIJ Int. Express 6 (2019) 116527.
61 (2021) 1641–1649. [53] C.L. Miao, C.J. Shang, H.S. Zurob, G.D. Zhang, S.V. Subra-
[21] Y. Tian, H. Yu, T. Zhou, K. Wang, Z. Zhu, Mater. Charact. 188 manian, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 43 (2012) 665–676.
(2022) 111919. [54] T. Gladman, Mater. Sci. Technol. 15 (1999) 30–36.
[22] Z.B. Liu, Z. Yang, J.X. Liang, Z.Y. Yang, G.M. Sheng, J. Iron
Steel Res. Int. 29 (2022) 207–214. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds
[23] H. Luo, X. Wang, Z. Liu, Z. Yang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 51 exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the
(2020) 130–136. author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the
[24] C. Zhang, W. Hui, X. Zhao, Y. Zhang, X. Zhao, Eng. Fail. Anal. accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the
135 (2022) 106144. terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
123