482 - Quashing

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Crl. M.C. No. OF 2022
IN THE MATTER OF:
RAKESH SAHGAL & ANR. …PETITIONERS

VERSUS
STATE & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
INDEX
S.No PARTICULARS PAGES
1. NOTICE OF MOTION
2. URGENT APPLICATION
3. LIST OF DATES AND EVENTS
4. MEMO OF PARTIES
5. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION

UNDER SECTION 482 OF CODE
OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE,
1973 SEEKING QUASHING OF
FIR NO. 0575/2022 DATED
12.09.2022 U/S 498A/406/ 34 IPC
REGISTERED AT PS MALVIYA
NAGAR, DISTRICT SOUTH
DELHI, NEW DELHI AND ALL
OTHER PROCEEDINGS
EMANATING OUT OF IT
ALONGWITH SUPPORTING
AFFIDAVIT.
6. ANNEXURE-P-1:
FIR No. 0575/2022 DATED

12.09.2022 U/S 498A/406/ 34 IPC
REGISTERED AT PS MALVIYA
NAGAR, DISTRICT SOUTH
DELHI, NEW DELHI
7. ANNEXURE-P-2:
ID PROOF OF THE PETITIONER
8. ANNEXURE-P-3:
COPY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

PETITION PENDING
ADJUDICATION BEFORE MS.
SANA KHAN, LD, M.M., SOUTH
DELHI, SAKET COURT, NEW
DELHI, FILED BY RESPONDENT
NO. 2.
9. ANNEXURE-P-4 (COLLY.) :
COPY OF ORDER DATED

26.10.2021 AND 07.01.2022
PASSED IN COMPLAINT
BEARING NO. 1338/2021 TITLED
AS HARSHA ARORA VS.
SAKSHAM SAHGAL & ORS.
10. ANNEXURE-P-5
COPY OF ORDER DATED

01.11.2022 PASSED IN
CRIMINAL M.C. NO. 5571/2022
TITLED AS “SAKSHI KAPOOR
VS. STATE GOVT OF NCT
DELHI & ORS.”
11. Crl M. C. No._________of 2022
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION

482 Cr.P.C. ON BEHALF OF THE
PETITIONER SEEKING STAY OF
PROCEEDINGS ALONGWITH
AFFIDAVIT.
12. Crl M. C. No._________of 2022
APPLICATION U/S. 482 CR.P.C.

FOR EXEMPTION ALONGWITH
AFFIDAVIT.
13. VAKALATNAMA
14. COURT FEES
15. PROOF OF ADVANCE SERVICE
THROUGH
DEEPAK AGARWAL/ SAMEER SRIVASTAVA

ADVOCATES
E-188, LGF, EAST OF KAILASH,
NEW DELHI- 110065
PLACE: DELHI MOBILE: 9999730492
DATE: EMAIL : [email protected]
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
STATE & ORS. ….RESPONDENTS
NOTICE OF MOTION
To,
The Standing Counsel (Criminal)

Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
Sir/Madam,
The enclosed petition is being filed by us on behalf of the
Petitionersand is likely to be listed on or any date,
thereafter. Please take notice accordingly.
PETITIONERS
THROUGH

ADVOCATES
NEW DELHI- 110065
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
URGENT APPLICATION
To,
The Registrar,
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi
Sir,
Kindly treat the accompanying petition as urgent in accordance
with the High Court rules and orders since urgent orders as per
the prayer clause are prayed for.
PETITIONER
THROUGH

ADVOCATES
NEW DELHI- 110065
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
[PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CODE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 SEEKING QUASHING
OF FIR NO. 0575/2022 DATED 12.09.2022 U/S 498A/406/ 34
IPC REGISTERED AT PS MALVIYA NAGAR, DISTRICT
SOUTH DELHI, NEW DELHI AND ALL OTHER
PROCEEDINGS EMANATING OUT OF IT]
MEMO OF PARTIES
1. RAKESH KUMAR SAHGAL

S/O LATE RAM KRISHNA SAHGAL
R/O PLOT 141-142, FLAT NO. 404,
MONDAY MARKET ROAD, VIPIN GARDEN,
UTTAM NAGAR, DELHI-110059
EMAIL : [email protected]
MOB : 6393006983
2. KUSUM SAHGAL
W/O RAKESH KUMAR
R/O PLOT 141-142, FLAT NO. 404,
EMAIL : [email protected]
MOB : 8707505711
VERSUS
1. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI)

THROUGH SHO, PS MALVIYA NAGAR
DIST : SOUTH
EMAIL: [email protected]
2. HARSHA ARORA
W/O SAKSHAM SAHGAL,
R/O PLOT 141-142, FLAT NO. 404,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT:
JG2-24, SF BLOCK JG, KHIRKI EXTN DELHI,
SOUTH, DELHI
3. SAKSHAM SAHGAL, ,
S/O RAKESH KUMAR SAHGAL
R/O PLOT 141-142, FLAT NO. 404,
…PROFORMA RESPONDENT
4. SAKSHI KAPOOR
W/o Sh. SHALEEN KAPPOR
R/o PLOT NO. 121, FLAT NO. B-2,
INDRAPURAM, GYAN KHAND-1,
SHIPRA SUN CITI, GAZIABAD,
UTTAR PRADESH-201014
EMAIL: [email protected]
MOBILE: 9999730492
…PROFORMA RESPONDENT
PETITIONERS
THROUGH

ADVOCATES
NEW DELHI- 110065
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
P.S. : MALVIYA NAGAR,

FIR No. 0575/22 DATED 12.09.2022
U/S 498A/ 406/ 34 IPC
DIST : SOUTH DELHI
PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CODE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 SEEKING QUASHING
OF FIR NO. 0575/2022 DATED 12.09.2022 U/S 498A/406/ 34
SOUTH DELHI, NEW DELHI AND ALL OTHER
PROCEEDINGS EMANATING OUT OF IT
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :-
THE HON’BLE CHIEF

JUSTICE AND HIS
COMPANION JUSTICES
1. That the Petitioners are preferring the present petition
seeking quashing of FIR No. 0575/2022 Dated 12.09.2022
for alleged offence U/s 498A/406/ 34 IPC registered at PS
Malviya Nagar, District South Delhi, New Delhi and all
other proceedings emanating out of it. Copy of FIR No.
0575/2022 Dated 12.09.2022 for alleged offence U/s

498A/406/ 34 IPC registered at PS Malviya Nagar, District
South Delhi, New Delhi is annexed herewith and marked as
Annexure P-1.
2. That Petitioners are the is the law-abiding citizen of India
and are the old age parents of Respondent No. 3. ID proof of
the Petitioners is annexed herewith and marked as
Annexure P-2 (Colly.).
3. That Respondent No. 2 got married to Respondent No. 3 on
12.11.2016 at Yatrik Hotel, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. The
marriage was a arrange marriage, wherein no dowry was
exchanged between the parties.
4. That apparently some matrimonial dispute arose between
the Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3 in pursuance of
which Respondent No. 2 has filed Complainant under
Section 12 of the Domestic violence Act, alleging false
allegations against Petitioners, Respondent No. 3 and
Respondent No. 4 which is pending adjudication before Ms.
Sana Khan, Ld, M.M., South Delhi, Saket Court, New Delhi
and the next date of hearing in the said matter is 18.10.2022
in which Petitioners and Respondent No. 3 to Respondent
No. 4 are arrayed as parties. Copy of Domestic Violence

Petition pending adjudication before Ms. Sana Khan, Ld,
M.M., South Delhi, Saket Court, New Delhi, filed by
Respondent No. 2 is annexed herewith and marked as
Annexure P-3.
5. It is relevant to mention here that while issuing summons
vide order dated 07.01.2022 in the said matter the Court of
Ms. Sana Khan, Ld, M.M., South Delhi, Saket Court, New
Delhi Declined to issue summon to the Respondent No. 4
herein. Copy of Order dated 26.10.2021 and 07.01.2022
passed in Complaint bearing No. 1338/2021 titled as Harsha
Arora vs. Saksham Sahgal & Ors. are annexed herewith and
marked as Annexure P-4 (Colly.).
6. That it is further submitted that to the best of the knowledge
to the Petitioners the Respondent No. 4 has filed a Criminal
Petition bearing Criminal M.C. No. 5571/2022 under
Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashing of the FIR bearing No.
0575 dated 12.09.2022 for alleged offence under Section
498A/406/34 IPC at PS Malviya Nagar and vide order dated
01.11.2022 this Hon’ble Court has been pleased to issue
notice to the Respondent and the said Petition is now listed
for 13.03.2023. Copy of Order dated 01.11.2022 passed in

Criminal M.C. No. 5571/2022 titled as “Sakshi Kapoor vs.
State Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.” is annexed as Annexure
P-5.
7. That on 08.11.2021 the Respondent No. 2 made a
Complaint with PS Malviya Nagar alleging domestic
violence against her. The Complaint dated 08.11.2021
culminated in to FIR bearing No. 0575 dated 12.09.2022 for
alleged offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at PS
Malviya Nagar.
8. That pursuant to the lodging of the said FIR the police have
directed the Petitioners to join investigation. The Petitioners
in compliance of the said direction duly joined investigation
and cooperated with the concerned investigating officer.
9. It is submitted that the Petitioners who are the parents-in-
law of the Respondent No. 2 has nothing to do or has no say
in the internal family matter of the Respondents and
Respondent No. 2 has falsely implicated Petitioners in the
entire dispute. The said proceedings came as a shock to the
Petitioners who was happily leading a married life who had
nothing to do with the family dispute of the Respondents. It
is apparent that Respondent No. 2 has falsely implicated

Petitioners only with a view to pressurize the other
Respondents.
10. That in view of the facts and circumstances mentioned
hereinabove the Petitioners is constrained to this Hon’ble
Court seeking quashing of the FIR no. 0575 dated
12.09.2022, inter-alia, on the following grounds:
GROUNDS
A. That the Petitioners is falsely implicated in the 0575 dated
12.09.2022 for alleged offence U/s 498A/406/ 34 IPC
registered at PS Malviya Nagar, District South Delhi, New
Delhi by Respondent no. 2 merely to make pressure over
the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5.
B. That the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Bhajan Lal
reported in 1992 Supp 1 SCC 335 has been pleased to
hold that criminal proceedings ought to be quashed where
allegations are so absurd that no prudent person can arrive
at a conclusion that there is sufficient ground. The Hon'ble
Court has also been pleased to observe that a criminal
proceeding that has been initiated with an ulterior motive
shall be quashed.
102. (1) Where the allegations made in the first
information report or the complaint, even if they are
taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety
do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a
case against the accused.
(2) Where the allegations in the first information report
and other materials, if any, accompanying the FIR do
not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an
investigation by police officers under Section 156(1) of
the Code except under an order of a Magistrate within
the purview of Section 155(2) of the Code.
(3) Where the uncontroverted allegations made in the
FIR or complaint and the evidence collected in support
of the same do not disclose the commission of any
offence and make out a case against the accused.
(4) Where the allegations in the FIR do not constitute a
cognizable offence but constitute only a non-cognizable
offence, no investigation is permitted by a police officer
without an order of a Magistrate as contemplated under
Section 155(2) of the Code.

(5) Where the allegations made in the FIR or complaint
are so absurd and inherently improbable on the basis of
which no prudent person can ever reach a just
conclusion that there is sufficient ground for
proceeding against the accused.
(6) Where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any
of the provisions of the Code or the Act concerned
(under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the
institution and continuance of the 21 proceedings
and/or where there is a specific provision in the Code
or the Act concerned, providing efficacious redress for
the grievance of the aggrieved party.
(7) Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended
with mala fide and/or where the proceeding is
maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for
wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to
spite him due to private and personal grudge.
C. That the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of
Karnataka Vs. M. Devendrappa reported in 2002 (3) SCC
890 has held that the Court would be justified in quashing
of a criminal proceeding if its continuance amounts to

abuse of process of Court and that judicial process should
not be an instrument of oppression.
D. That the investigation of the case is tainted and the
Police has not taken into consideration that there is no
corroborating evidence available on the record to prove
the case of the Prosecutrix instead the allegations are
ex-facie nullified by the own conduct of the
Prosecutrix herself.
E. That the learned Court below has taken cognizance of
the charge sheet without application of mind. The
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pepsi Foods
Limited Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate reported in
1998 (5) SCC 749 has been pleased to hold that
summoning of accused is a serious matter therefore,
order should reflect application of mind.
F. That in the present case non application of mind is
evident as the learned Court below has not even taken
care of the fact as to whether the applicant is in Jail or
not and has been repeatedly issuing directions for the

appearance of the applicant from Jail.
G. That the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of
Fakhruddin Ahmad Vs. State of Uttaranchal
reported in 2008 (17) SCC 157 has been pleased to
hold that the Court must apply its mind at the time of
taking cognizance to the allegations made in the Police
report, complaint or information received from source
other than Police report and material filed therewith,
which is absent in the present case.
H. That being aggrieved and having no other alternative
and efficacious remedy, the applicant invokes inherent
powers of this Hon'ble Court under section 482 Code
of Criminal Procedure to secure the ends of justice and
to prevent the abuse of process of Court.
I. That the general and omnibus allegations made by the
Respondent No. 2 under the said FIR against the present
Petitioners merely to misuse the due process of the law.
J. That the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of
Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam & Ors. Versus State of
Bihar & Ors. bearing Criminal Appeal No. 195 Of 2022

observe that in the absence of any specific role attributed
to the accused appellants, it would be unjust if the
Appellants are forced to go through the tribulations of a
trial, i.e., general and omnibus allegations cannot manifest
in a situation where the relatives of the complainant’s
husband are forced to undergo trial. Relevant extract of the
said judgement is mentioned herein after:
“…. 22. Therefore, upon consideration of the
relevant circumstances and in the absence of any
specific role attributed to the accused appellants, it
would be unjust if the Appellants are forced to go
through the tribulations of a trial, i.e., general and
omnibus allegations cannot manifest in a situation
where the relatives of the complainant’s husband
are forced to undergo trial. It has been highlighted
by this court in varied instances, that a criminal
trial leading to an eventual acquittal also inflicts
severe scars upon the accused, and such an exercise
must therefore be discouraged.
23. In view of the above facts and discussions, the
impugned order dated 13.11.2019 passed by the

High Court of Patna is set aside. The impugned
F.I.R. No. 248 of 2019 against the Appellants under
Sections 341, 323, 379, 354, 498A read with Section
34 IPC stands quashed…”
K. That the entire process is denied in law and is liable to be
quashed and set aside in as much as there is no evidence
against the Petitioner herein and no useful purpose would
be served by putting the matter on trial qua the Petitioner
herein.
11. That Petitioners have previously approached with the
similar remedy, bearing No.__________ , and
___________is seeking liberty to withdraw the above stated
and to press the present Petition with necessary
modifications as per the present circumstances of the case.
12. That being aggrieved and having no other alternative
and efficacious remedy, the applicant invokes inherent
powers of this Hon'ble Court under section 482 Code of
Criminal Procedure to secure the ends of justice and to
prevent the abuse of process of Court.
PRAYER:
It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court
may kindly be pleased to : -
(a) Quash/ set-aside the FIR No. 0575/2022 Dated 12.09.2022
for alleged offence U/s 498A/406/ 34 IPC registered at PS
Malviya Nagar, District South Delhi, New Delhi and
chargesheet and summoning order dated all other
incidental proceedings emanating out of it.; and
(b) Pass further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit
and proper in the present case.
PETITIONERS
THROUGH

ADVOCATES
NEW DELHI- 110065
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Rakesh Kumar Sahgal, aged about ___ years, S/o Late Ram
Krishna Sahgal R/o Plot 141-142, Flat No. 404, Monday Market
Road, Vipin Garden, Uttam Nagar, Delhi-110059 do hereby
solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
1. That I am Petitioner No. 1 in the captioned matter and as such
I am fully conversant with the facts of the case and thus
competent to depose the present affidavit.
2. That the accompanying petition has been drafted by my
counsel under my instruction and the same are true and correct
to best of my knowledge and the contents of the same may
kindly be read as part and parcel of this affidavit as the same
are not being repeated here for the sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION :
Verified at Delhi on this day of November, 2022 that the
contents of the above mentioned affidavit are true to my
knowledge that nothing has been concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Kusum Sahgal, aged about ___ years, W/o Rakesh Kumar
Sahgal R/o Plot 141-142, Flat No. 404, Monday Market Road,
Vipin Garden, Uttam Nagar, Delhi-110059, do hereby solemnly
affirm and declare as under:-
1. That I am Petitioner No. 2 in the captioned matter and as such
I am fully conversant with the facts of the case and thus
counsel under my instruction and the same are true and correct
to best of my knowledge and the contents of the same may
kindly be read as part and parcel of this affidavit as the same
are not being repeated here for the sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION :
DEPONENT
Crl. M.A. No. OF 2022
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 Cr.P.C. ON

BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS FOR EXEMPTION
FROM FILING THE CERTIFIED COPIES, FAIR
TYPED/TRANSLATED COPIES WITH PROPER LEFT
HAND SIDE MARGIN OF THE ANNEXURES ALONG
WITH THE MAIN PETITION.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the accompanying petition has been filed by the
Petitioners seeking interim reliefs. Various annexures have
been annexed some of which are not certified copies or
true typed copies. Petitioners undertakes to file certified/
typed/ translated copies etc. with clear 4 cm left side
margin as and when directed by this Hon’ble Court.
PRAYER:
It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may kindly be pleased to:-

(a) Exempt Petitioners from filing the certified copies, fair
typed/translated copies with proper left hand side margin
of the Annexures along with the main petition;
(b) Pass any other and further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court
may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of
the present case.
PETITIONERS
THROUGH

ADVOCATES
NEW DELHI- 110065
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
Road, Vipin Garden, Uttam Nagar, Delhi-110059, do hereby
1. That I am Petitioner No. 1 in the captioned matter and as
such I am fully conversant with the facts of the case and thus
2. That the accompanying application has been drafted by my
counsel under my instruction and the same are true and
correct to best of my knowledge and the contents of the same
may kindly be read as part and parcel of this affidavit as the
same are not being repeated here for the sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION :
DEPONENT
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
2. That the accompanying application has been drafted by my
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION :
DEPONENT
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
LIST OF DATE & EVENTS

12.11.2016 Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3 got
married at Yatrik Hotel, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh as
per Hindu rights and rituals.
2021 Allegedly some matrimonial dispute arose
between Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3
October, Complaint under Domestic Violence Act before

2021
Ld. MM, Saket Court against the Respondent No.
3 to 5 alongwith Petitioners have been filed by
the Respondent No. 2
26.10.2021 Summon issued to Petitioners and Respondent
No. 3 in the said Complaint.
07.01.2022 Ld. MM, Saket Court, Delhi declined to Summon
the Petitioners as she is residing separately from

Respondent No. 2 and as she is married sister-in-
law of Respondent No. 2.
12.09.2022 Respondent No. 2 made a Complaint with PS
Malviya Nagar alleging domestic violence
against her. The Complaint dated 12.09.2022
culminated in to FIR bearing No. 0575 dated
12.09.2022 for alleged offence under Section
498A/406/34 IPC at PS Malviya Nagar.
01.11.2022 Hon’ble Court has been pleased to issue notice to
the Respondent and the said Petition is now listed
for 13.03.2023 in Criminal M.C. No. 5571/2022
titled as “Sakshi Kapoor vs. State Govt of NCT
Delhi & Ors.”
July, 2022 Hence, this Petition.
PETITIONER
THROUGH

ADVOCATES
NEW DELHI- 110065
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 Cr.P.C. ON

BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER SEEKING STAY OF
PROCEEDINGS QUA FIR NO. 0575/2022 DATED
12.09.2022 FOR ALLEGED OFFENCE U/S 498A/ 406/ 34
SOUTH DELHI, NEW DELHI DURING THE PENDENCY
OF THE CAPTIONED MATTER.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the Petitioner is preferring the present petition
seeking quashing of FIR No. 0575/2022 dated 12.09.2022 for
alleged offence U/s 498A/406/ 34 IPC registered at PS Malviya
Nagar, District South Delhi, New Delhi and all other proceedings
emanating out of it.
2. That the contents of the accompanying petition may be
read as part and parcel of the present application and the same is
not repeated herein for the sake of brevity and to avoid repetition.
3. It is submitted that petitioners has good case on merit and
there is every likelihood of petitioners succeeding on merit and
as such great prejudice shall be caused to the petitioner if the
proceeding qua FIR No. 0575/2022 dated 12.09.2022 for alleged
offence U/s 498A/ 406/ 34 IPC registered at PS Malviya Nagar,
District South Delhi, New Delhi are not stayed during the
pendency of the captioned matter.
4. That in these circumstances present application is being
filed by the petitioners seeking stay of proceeding qua FIR No.
0575/2022 dated 12.09.2022 for alleged offence U/s 498A/ 406/
34 IPC registered at PS Malviya Nagar, District South Delhi,
New Delhi during the pendency of the captioned matter.
5. It is submitted that no prejudice shall be caused to either of
the parties if the proceedings is stayed during the pendency of the
captioned matter. The present application is made bona fide and
in the interest of justice.
PRAYER:
It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may kindly be pleased to:-

(a) Stay the proceeding qua FIR No. 0575/2022 dated
12.09.2022 for alleged offence U/s 498A/ 406/ 34 IPC registered
at PS Malviya Nagar, District South Delhi, New Delhi during the
pendency of the captioned matter; and
(b) Pass any other and further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court
may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the
present case.
PETITIONERS
THROUGH

ADVOCATES
NEW DELHI- 110065
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
Road, Vipin Garden, Uttam Nagar, Delhi-110059, do hereby
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION :
DEPONENT
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION :
contents of the above-mentioned affidavit are true to my
DEPONENT

482 - Quashing

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

482 - Quashing

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Crl. M.C. No. OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAKESH SAHGAL & ANR. …PETITIONERS

S.No PARTICULARS PAGES

3. LIST OF DATES AND EVENTS

5. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION

FIR No. 0575/2022 DATED

ID PROOF OF THE PETITIONER

COPY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

COPY OF ORDER DATED

COPY OF ORDER DATED

11. Crl M. C. No._________of 2022

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION

12. Crl M. C. No._________of 2022

APPLICATION U/S. 482 CR.P.C.

14. COURT FEES

15. PROOF OF ADVANCE SERVICE

DEEPAK AGARWAL/ SAMEER SRIVASTAVA

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAKESH SAHGAL & ANR. …PETITIONERS

The Standing Counsel (Criminal)

The enclosed petition is being filed by us on behalf of the

Petitionersand is likely to be listed on or any date,

thereafter. Please take notice accordingly.

DEEPAK AGARWAL/ SAMEER SRIVASTAVA

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAKESH SAHGAL & ANR. …PETITIONERS

Kindly treat the accompanying petition as urgent in accordance

the prayer clause are prayed for.

DEEPAK AGARWAL/ SAMEER SRIVASTAVA

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAKESH SAHGAL & ANR. …PETITIONERS

[PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CODE OF

1. RAKESH KUMAR SAHGAL

1. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI)

DEEPAK AGARWAL/ SAMEER SRIVASTAVA

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAKESH SAHGAL & ANR. …PETITIONERS

P.S. : MALVIYA NAGAR,

PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CODE OF

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :-

THE HON’BLE CHIEF

1. That the Petitioners are preferring the present petition

seeking quashing of FIR No. 0575/2022 Dated 12.09.2022

for alleged offence U/s 498A/406/ 34 IPC registered at PS

Malviya Nagar, District South Delhi, New Delhi and all

other proceedings emanating out of it. Copy of FIR No.

0575/2022 Dated 12.09.2022 for alleged offence U/s

South Delhi, New Delhi is annexed herewith and marked as

2. That Petitioners are the is the law-abiding citizen of India

and are the old age parents of Respondent No. 3. ID proof of

the Petitioners is annexed herewith and marked as

Annexure P-2 (Colly.).

3. That Respondent No. 2 got married to Respondent No. 3 on

12.11.2016 at Yatrik Hotel, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. The

marriage was a arrange marriage, wherein no dowry was

exchanged between the parties.

4. That apparently some matrimonial dispute arose between

the Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3 in pursuance of

which Respondent No. 2 has filed Complainant under

Section 12 of the Domestic violence Act, alleging false

allegations against Petitioners, Respondent No. 3 and