Attractive : Innovative Education Journal

Vol. x No. x, Month 2020

Title Must Be Typed Using 12 Book Antiqua Font, Bold

Author
Author Affiliation, Country

Corresponding Author: email

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
Article history: An abstract of maximum 250 words is requred for any submitted
Received manuscript. Abstract is written using Book Antiqua-10. It is written
September 15, narratively containing at least the aim, method, and the result. It is written
2019 in 1 paragraph. Each manuscrip should have 3 to 6 Keyword written
Revised under the abstract. The keywords should help audience search the
January 24, relevant literature to their interest.
2020
Accepted Key words: first keyword, second keyword, third keyword
February 26,
2020
How to cite Name., (2020).Tittle. Attractive : Innovative Education Journal, x(x). page-page.
Journal Homepage https://www.attractivejournal.com/index.php/aj/
This is an open access article under the CC BY SA license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Published by CV. Creative Tugu Pena

INTRODUCTION
The manuscript should be the original work either as a research or reference
studies which have never been published in any form of publication. The manuscript is
single-spaced. The margin text from the top, left, right, and bottom are 3 cm, 3 cm, 3 cm
and 3 respectively. The manuscript is written using Book Antiqua-11. The suggested
organization of the paper consists of: Introduction - Methods - Results and Discussion -
Conclusion. Each part should explicitly declare the contents.
Please explore in more words the background of your paper and your current
research position among other research on related themes. You should discuss here as
well your research’s relations with those of other researchers; literature review,
especially on most relevant, newly academic works published in high reputation
journals, is a must. Please try to answer at question: why you believe that your research
question is such an important to answer and how you think your answer would be a
contribution to the existing scholarship on the subject.
Here you may discuss every aspect of the issue. It is necessary to build
argument and to provide original data discussed and compared to research and works
of other scholars. In other words, the way to discuss an issue here is by combining the
data and the discussion. So, it is not recommended to separate merely data description
from the analysis on it. Every quotation is written down in a specific way that can be
identified as a “quotation” different from your original text. Then desrcibe your
purpose of this research.

METHOD
The research methodolgy section desribes in detail how the study was
conducted. A complete description of the methods used enables the reader to evaluate
the appropriateness of the research methodology. You must describe exactly what you
did: what and how experiments were run, what, how much, where, when, and why

Attractive : Innovative Education Journal

Vol. x, No. x, Month 2020
ISSN : 2685-6085
Tittle

equipment and materials were used. The main consideration is to ensure that enough
detail is provided to verify your findings and to enable the replication of the research.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The purpose of the Results and Discussion is to state your findings and make a
interpretations and/or opinions, explain the implications of your findings, and make
suggestions for future research. In the Result section, summarize the collected data and
the analysis performed on those data relevant to the issue that is to follow. The Result
should be clear and concise. It should be written objectively and factually, and without
expressing personal opinion. It includes numbers, tables, and figures (e.g., charts and
graphs). Number tables and figures consecutively in accordance with their appearance
in the text.

Table 1. An example of a table

An example of a heading Column A (t) Column B (T)

Add an entry 1 2
Add an entry 1 2
Add an entry 1 3

In the Discussion section should explore the significance of the results of the
study. A combined Result and Discussion section is also appropriate. This section
allows you to offer your interpretation and explain the meaning of your results.
Emphasize any theoretical or practical consequences of the results. The Discussion
section should be a reasoned and justifiable commentary on the importance of your
findings. This section states why the problem is important; what larger issues and what
propositions are confirmed or disconfirmed by the extrapolation of these findings to
such overarching issues.
The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research
questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but it does not
simply repeat or rearrange the introduction; the discussion should always explain how
your study has moved the reader's understanding of the research problem forward
from where you left them at the end of the introduction.

CONCLUSION
The conclusion is a summary of the results and discussion and should be written
in paragraphs instead on numbering. Moreover, it can also be added the prospect of
the development of research results and application prospects of further studies into
the next (based on results and discussion). The main conclusions of the study should be
presented in a short Conclusions section. Do not repeat earlier sections.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (Applied since Vol 2 No. 3 2020)

This is a short text to acknowledge the contributions of specific colleagues,
institutions, or agencies that aided the efforts of the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS STATEMENT (Applied since Vol 2 No. 3 2020)

The Author Contributions Statement can be up to several sentences long and
should briefly describe the tasks of individual authors. Please list only 2 initials for
each author, without full stops, but separated by commas (e.g. JC, JS). In the case of
two authors with the same initials, please use their middle initial to differentiate

22
Tittle

between them (e.g. REW, RSW). The Author Contributions Statement should be
included at the end of the manuscript before the References

REFERENCES
All references must follow the APA 6 th Edition tas far as possible. It is suggested
the use of a reference manager, such as Zotero

REFERENCES
Anna, UHL, Chamot. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: current issue and
research, annual review of applied linguistic. Volume 25, No. 1, p. 12-130. Retrieved
06 May, 2019. From: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500061
Anan Sutisna, M. P. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Bidang Pendidikan. UNJ PRESS.
Google Scholar
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. USA:
Wadsworth. Google Scholar
Balla, Ervin. (2016). A general outlook of the importance of the English language in the
world today. Academic journal of inter disciplinary studies. Volume 5, No. 3, p. 499-
503. Retrieved 04 May, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p499
Cozma, Mihaela. (2015). The challenge of teaching English to adult learners in today”s
world. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences. Volume 197, p. 1209-1214. Retrieved
04 May, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.380
Herlianawati, A., Lestari, L., & Suwono, M. (2017, October). Learning English through
the Use of Classroom Language in Community Service. In Social Sciences,
Humanities and Economics Conference (SoSHEC 2017) (pp. 81-86). Atlantis Press.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/soshec-17.2018.16
Kattlen Cotton . (2001). Principals and students achievement. Alexandria: association for
supervision and curriculum development. Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M, and Spada, N. (2006). How language are learned. Oxford: Oxford
university press
Marguerite, Lodico, Pean. T, Spaulding, Ketherine. (2006). Methods in educational
research from theory to practice. San Francisco: Josses-bass.
Megawati, F. (2016). Kesulitan mahasiswa dalam mencapai pembelajaran bahasa
Inggris secara efektif. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal pendidikan, 5(2), 147-156.
https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v5i2.246
Moule, P., & Hek, G. (2011). Making sense of research: An introduction for health and social
care practitioners. Sage.
Nan, L. 2020. A Survey on Thai University Students ’ Use of English Outside of the
Classroom : A Survey on Thai University Students ’ Use of English Outside of the
Classroom : A Case Study (August). Google Schoolar
B., Geoffrey, Brumfit, C., Falvell, R., Peter, H., and Pincas , A. (2003). Teaching English as
foreign language. University of London institute of education: Routledge London
and New York Google Scholar
Souriyavongsa, T., Rany, S., Jafre Zainol Abidin, M. & Lai Mei, L. 2013. Factors Causes
Students Low English Language Learning: A Case Study in the National
University of Laos. International Journal of English Language Education 1(1): 179–
192. Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron. (1991). Topic confusion on English-Asian discourse. Suzanne wong-scollen.
Volume 10, No. 3. p. 456-465. Retrieved 03 April, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1991.tb00145.x

23
Tittle

Stanzione, C. & Schick, B. 2014. Environmental language factors in theory of mind

development: Evidence from children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing or who
have specific language impairment. Topics in Language Disorders 34(4): 296–312.
doi:10.1097/TLD.0000000000000038. Google Scholar

Copyright Holder :
© Name (2020).

First Publication Right :

© Attractive : Innovative Education Journal

This article is under:

24