Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

ANT 202

Assignment on

“How Myanmar's Ethic Cleaning


issue affects Bangladesh society”

Submitted by
Juhana Islam
ID: 21105027
A ‘textbook case’ has proved to be a ‘real-life case’ through Myanmar’s ethnic cleansing. According to

United Nations (2022), ethnic cleansing is defined as, an intentional strategy adopted by one ethnic or

religious group to expel the civilians of another ethnic or religious group from specific geographical

locations by violent and terror-inspiring actions. The UNHCR has labelled the atrocities committed by the

Myanmar government against the Rohingyas as "ethnic cleansing" (Khuda, 2020). Almost five years have

passed since the Rohingya community started fleeing to Bangladesh. In 2017 the persecuted community

was welcomed by the local people, but as time passed with almost no repatriation in near sight, the local

communities are getting anxious assuming their impending doom. Starting from constraining the labour

market to restraining the lives of wild animals like elephants, the Rohingya crisis is affecting Bangladesh

society with its domino effect. Owing to the multi-faceted disruptions created towards the host

communities, this writeup shed some light on how Myanmar's Ethic Cleansing issue affects Bangladesh

society.

Effect on economy

The Rohingyas and the residents of Cox's Bazar both communicate in a related language. As a result, they

can integrate with the community, which might be catastrophic for Bangladesh. The day labourers are

shifting to work in the camps with the relief organisations as there are plenty of job vacancies. So there's

an induced labour shortage. It also has a detrimental effect on tourism at Saint Martin Island. Ship

movement is strictly prohibited near the Bangladesh-Myanmar border due to the continued turbulence.

According to recent claims by Cox's Bazar Tour Operators, Bangladesh might lose over a million tourists

(Khuda, 2020). Moreover, more day labourers are willing to work for less money. So the native

population is losing jobs. Additionally, it may influence the diversity of exports, availability of power,

foreign direct investment and military spending.


Effect on population and education

Being the largest refugee camp on the planet, the increase of people is taking place in the geometric

progression while that of resources for livelihood is taking place in arithmetic progression. It will

eventually increase the burden on access to food, employment, healthcare, and other essentials of local

communities. Since the Rohingyas arrived, local children have had challenges getting an education. Some

schools have been repurposed into military barracks, and some local students are skipping classes to work

in the Rohingya camps (Pittaway & Cope, 2007).

Effect on the perception of locals

Locals now must carry their national identity cards to verify they are Bangladeshi citizens. They fail to

graze their cattle in the fields, as refugees now live there. They often feel anxious about what to do if the

refugees start acting aggressively. The local populace used to benefit from numerous services like free

medical examinations and healthcare, stipends, and counselling offered by several NGOs and INGOs.

However, the cessation of such services during the start of the crisis fueled locals' hostility toward the

Rohingya population (Khuda, 2020). Refugees outnumbering the host civilians is now making them feel

like a minor living among minorities.

Effect on law and order

i. False identification: Many Rohingya refugees attempt to get Bangladeshi identification, such as a

passport or identity card, by paying off corrupt local police personnel and political activists.

ii. Drug cartel: The surge of Rohingya migrants escaping Myanmar will promote narcotics usage and

trading. The Ya ba carried by Rohingya immigrants impacts the young people in the neighbourhood.

Effect on environment

It resulted in losses of 0.05% in the entire national forest area and 1.67% in the Cox's Bazar forest zone.

The value of the forest land taken is projected to be five billion Taka (Abrar, 2018). The refugee camp
region uses plastic, aluminium, and tarpaulin extensively as primary building materials. These are

detrimental to the environment in addition to not being disposable (Zhou et al., 2010).

Effect on ecology

Because of the indiscriminate hill cutting done to make space for the Rohingya migrants, the landscape of

the hills has lost much of its natural setting. Around 50% of the slopes have been entirely cleared (Center

for Policy Dialogue, 2017). Hence, landslides might occur at any time. The UNEP research claims that

wildlife is imperilled because of the temporary settlements. It significantly affects animals, especially

elephants whose habitats are being lost and disrupted. Freshwater streams have been poisoned, and

groundwater sources are soon running out. Smoke from firewood burned by refugees and emissions from

vehicles transporting people and commodities into the camps are to blame for the worsening air pollution

in Ukhia and Tekfnaf.

To summarize, the struggles of the economy and ecology of Bangladesh have dreadingly multiplied due

to the Rohingya crisis created by the ethnic cleansing in Myanmar. With repatriation to Myanmar doubtful

shortly, Bangladesh may be forced to house the refugees forever. It is high time for the international

community to become more aware of Bangladesh's massive budgetary load. Not only the voices of

refugees but also, the unvoiced utterances of host communities should also be highlighted to attain the

‘golden deer of peace’ for the whole of humankind.

References:

Nations, U. (2022). United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility

to Protect. Un.org.

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/ethnic-cleansing.shtml
The impacts and challenges to host country Bangladesh due to sheltering the Rohingya

refugees. (2020). Cogent Social Sciences.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2020.1770943

Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the

evidence. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship,

25(5), 477‐506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607080656

Abrar, C. R. (2018). On the margin: Refugees, migrants and minorities. Refugee and

Migratory Movement Research Unit.

Zhou, H., Wang, J., Wan, J., & Jia, H. (2010). Resilience to natural hazards: A geographic

perspective. Natural Hazards, 53(1), 21–41.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y

Center for Policy Diologue. (2017). Presentation on implications of the Rohingya crisis for

Bangladesh.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2017&author=C

enter+for+Policy+Diologue&title=Presentation+on+implications+of+the+Rohingya+c

risis+for+Bangladesh

You might also like