Collective Memory Identity and The Legacies of Slavery and Indenture 1st Edition Farzana Gounder (Editor) 2024 Scribd Download
Collective Memory Identity and The Legacies of Slavery and Indenture 1st Edition Farzana Gounder (Editor) 2024 Scribd Download
com
https://ebookmeta.com/product/collective-memory-
identity-and-the-legacies-of-slavery-and-
indenture-1st-edition-farzana-gounder-editor/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://ebookmeta.com/product/populism-and-collective-memory-
comparing-fascist-legacies-in-western-europe-1st-edition-luca-
manucci/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/brazilian-african-diaspora-in-
ghana-the-tabom-slavery-dissonance-of-memory-identity-and-
locating-home-1st-edition-kwame-essien/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-psychic-hold-of-slavery-
legacies-in-american-expressive-culture-soyica-diggs-colbert/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/language-nation-and-identity-in-
the-classroom-legacies-of-modernity-and-colonialism-in-schooling-
counterpoints-david-hemphill/
Flags, Color, and the Legal Narrative: Public
Memory,Identity, and Critique 1st Edition Anne Wagner
https://ebookmeta.com/product/flags-color-and-the-legal-
narrative-public-memoryidentity-and-critique-1st-edition-anne-
wagner/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/imaging-identity-media-memory-and-
portraiture-in-the-digital-age-1st-edition-melinda-hinkson/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-moghul-saint-of-insanity-1st-
edition-farzana-moon/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/heritage-memory-and-identity-in-
postcolonial-board-games-1st-edition-michal-mochocki-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/researching-memory-and-identity-in-
russia-and-eastern-europe-interdisciplinary-methodologies-1st-
edition-jade-mcglynn/
COLLECTIVE MEMORY, IDENTITY AND
THE LEGACIES OF SLAVERY
AND INDENTURE
Edited by
FARZANA GOUNDER
BRIDGET BRERETON
JEROME EGGER
HILDE NEUS
MANOHAR
2022
First published 2022
by Routledge
4 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2022 selection and editorial matter, Farzana Gounder, Bridget Brereton, Jerome
Egger, Hilde Neus-van der Putten; individual chapters, the contributors and
Manohar Publishers.
The right of Farzana Gounder, Bridget Brereton, Jerome Egger and Hilde Neus-van
der Putten to be identified as the authors of the editorial material, and of the authors
for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and
78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised
in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or
hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information
storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered
trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to
infringe.
Print edition not for sale in South Asia (India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh,
Pakistan or Bhutan)
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book has been requested
ISBN: 9781032278049 (hbk)
ISBN: 9781003294184 (ebk)
DOI: 10.4324/9781003294184
Typeset in Adobe Garamond 11/13
by Kohli Print, Delhi 110 051
Contents
Foreword 7
Brinsley samaroo
Introduction
Farzana Gounder, BridGet Brereton,
Jerome eGGer and Hilde neus 11
This book is the third in a series of ten, named The Legacy of Slavery
and Indentured Labour. The ten volumes are the result of a confer
ence with the same theme, The Legacy of Slavery and Indentured
Labour, organised by the Anton de Kom University of Suriname
from 18 to 22 June 2018 in Paramaribo.
This volume explores the evolution of the collective memories
of the mobility history of the labour of the Caribbean region. The
Caribbean provides a rich study of the different forms of labour
systems that have marked the politics of the coloniser and the
colonised historically. Further it provides the basis for an essential
study for discourses on colonialism and capitalism. The colonisers
came from the major powers in the Western world: Spain, Britain,
France and The Netherlands, and the region truly conceptualised
the great divide between Western capitalist consumers and the
‘others’, who, in the form of the enslaved and the indentured, were
there to supply the demand for sugar and other commodities.
Recent works have been devoted to understanding the slave and
indentured experiences beyond the nation state, with calls for com
parative analyses of experiences of labour mobility at the regional
and global levels (Vahed & Desai 2012). This interdisciplinary
volume provides another strand to labour mobility research, bridging
the gap between historiography and the present day diasporic com
munities, which emerged from slavery and indenture. The articles
in the volume collectively provide case studies from the Caribbean
context on the connections between the ‘mnemonic sites, prac
tices and forms’ (Olick & Robbins 1998: 124) of collective memory
and identity performances.
After the abolition of the British slave trade in 1808 and the
12 Farzana Gounder et al.
Vincent and Grenada (the 1850s), Natal (South Africa 1860 with
151,184 migrants), Suriname (1873 with 34,000 migrants) and
Fiji (1879 with 60,965 migrants) (Lal 2000).
The majority of the Indian labourers to the Caribbean came
from the United Provinces (UP) and were often familiar with agri
cultural work, indicating a farming background of many, though
not all. The impetus to become indentured was due to several
factors. The push factors were a combination of high debt burden
for peasants because of the colonial land tenure policy, crop fail
ure, poor weather conditions (such as droughts, poor monsoon
season), famine, and landowners’ demands. These factors drove
peasants out of the farming areas, particularly in UP, creating a
system of internal migration within India towards the East, where
they worked as unskilled labourers in mills, factories, docks, coal
mines, on roads and railways, or harvesting crops, such as jute.
These internal migrants would then send remittances home, cre
ating an essential economic backbone for their families. It is thought
that these internal migrants formed the bulk of the indentured
labourers. These individuals, already on the move in search of work,
were persuaded by recruiters to work in the colonies for higher
wages than in India. The internal migrants, thus, became trans-
migrants (Gillion 1962).
The indenture system had a far-reaching impact. For 82 years,
the global machinery of indenture turned peasants into labourers.
It also created employment for the officials of indenture not only
in India but also on the ships and in the colonies. In addition, it
provided employment to shipping companies, and even utilised
ex-indentured labourers, returning to India, where they became
recruiters of the uninitiated.
Moreover, there were complex, interlocking wheels that impacted
the lives of the labourers. There was the global machinery of in
denture (systems and processes that extended from India, across
the oceans and into the colonies), which interacted with gover
nance (state regulations on law and order), which, in turn, inter
acted with planters’ concerns and demands, and the labourers’
welfare (social, psychological, physiological and economic states of
being).
14 Farzana Gounder et al.
Music and food play an essential role in the legacy of Indian in
dentured labour in the Caribbean. Two articles in this part on
identity negotiations through music and cuisine analysed different
aspects in the way music traditions influenced this cultural trace
in the region. The third one looks at food as a way of understand
ing the presence of Indian cuisine on the tables of Caribbean
countries.
Introduction 21
REFERENCES
Ali, Ahmad. 2004. Girmit: Indian Indenture Experience in Fiji. Suva, Fiji: Fiji
Museum, Ministry of National Reconciliation and Multi-Ethnic Affairs.
Alonso, Ana Maria. 1988. ‘The effects of truth: Re-presentations of the past
and the imagining of community’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 1(1):
33-57.
Andrews, Charles Freer and Pearson, Walter Washington. 1916. Indentured
Labour in Fiji: An Independent Enquiry. Calcutta: Anti-Indenture League.
Assmann, Jan and Czaplicka John. 1995. ‘Collective memory and cultural
identity’, New German Critique, 65: 125-33.
Bahadur, Gaiutra. 2016. Coolie Woman: The Odyssey of Indenture. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Bates, Crispin. 2005. ‘Courts, Ship-rolls and Letters: Reflections on the Indian
Labour Diaspora’, in T. Awaya (ed.), Creating an Archive Today. Tokyo
University of Foreign Studies, 21st Century COE Programme, Centre for
Documentation and Area-Transcultural Studies, pp. 131-58.
Batsha, Nishant. 2017. ‘The Currents of Restless Toil: Colonial Rule and
Indian Indentured Labor in Trinidad and Fiji’ (Doctoral dissertation,
Columbia University).
Brereton, Bridget. 2013. ‘Ethnic histories: The Indocentric narrative of Trinidad’s
history’, in K. Mahabir (ed.), Caribbean Issues in the Indian Diaspora. New
Delhi, Serials Publications, 145-62.
Brubaker, Rogers, 2005. ‘The “diaspora” diaspora’, Ethnic and Racial Studies,
28(1): 1-19.
Carter, Marina. 1999. Lakshmi’s Legacy: Testimonies of Indian Women in the 19th
Century Mauritius. Rose Hill, Mauritius: Edictions de LC indien, Stanley.
Cole, Anthony. 2000. ‘Accidental Deaths on Fiji Plantations, 1879-1916’, in
B.V. Lal (ed.), Chalo Jahaji: On a Journey through Indenture in Fiji. Canberra:
Division of Pacific and Asian History, Australian National University; and
Suva: Fiji National Museum, pp. 324-60.
26 Farzana Gounder et al.
Fowler, Glenn. 2000. ‘A want of care: Death and disease on Fiji plantations,
1890-1900’, in B.V. Lal (ed.), Chalo Jahaji: On a Journey through Indenture
in Fiji. Canberra: Division of Pacific and Asian History, Australian
National University; and Suva: Fiji National Museum, pp. 273-90.
Gillion, Kenneth L. 1962. Fiji’s Indian Migrants: A History to the End of Inden
ture in 1920. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Gounder, Farzana. 2020. ‘Motherhood performativity in sub-altern life stories’,
in A. Pande (ed.), Women in the Indian Diaspora: Indentured and Post-
indentured Experiences. Singapore: Springer, pp. 21-35.
Gounder, Farzana, 2011. Indentured Identities: Resistance and Accommodation
in Plantation-era Fiji. The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Gounder, Farzana. 2014. ‘Who is “we”? Anniversary narrative as collective
memory’, in E. Stracke (ed.), Intersections: Applied Linguistics as a
Meeting Place. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing,
pp. 87-109.
Gupta, Charu. 2020. ‘Indentured women and Hindi print-public sphere in
early twentieth century India’, in F. Gounder, K. Hiralal, A. Pande and
M.S. Hassankhan (eds.), Women, Gender and the Legacy of Slavery and
Indenture. New Delhi: Manohar/Routledge, pp. 101-20.
Halbwachs, Maurice. 1950 [1980]. The Collective Memory. New York: Harper
and Row.
Hall, Stuart, 1990. ‘Cultural identity and diaspora’, in J. Rutherford (ed.),
Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, London: Lawrence & Wishart,
pp. 222-37.
Harvey, Jane. 2000. ‘Naraini’s story’, in B.V. Lal (ed.), Chalo Jahaji: On a
Journey through Indenture in Fiji. Canberra: Division of Pacific and
Asian History, Australian National University; and Suva: Fiji National
Museum, pp. 337-48.
Hassankhan, Maurits S. 2014. ‘The Indian indentured experience in Suriname.
Control, accommodation and resistance’, in M.S. Hassankhan, B.V. Lal
and D. Munro (eds.), Resistance and Indian Indenture Experience: Compara
tive Perspectives. New Delhi: Manohar, pp. 199-240.
Hoefte, Rosemarijn. 1987. ‘Female indentured labor in Suriname: for better or
for worse?’, Boletin de estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 42: 55-70.
Hoefte, Rosemarijn. 1998. In Place of Slavery: A Social History of British Indian
and Javanese Laborers in Suriname. Gainesville, FL: University Presses of
Florida.
Kale, Madhavi. 2010. Fragments of Empire: Capital, Slavery, and Indian
Indentured Labor in the British Caribbean. Pennsylvania: University of
Pennsylvania Press.
Introduction 27
Knapp, Steven. 1989. ‘Collective memory and the actual past’. Representations,
26: 123-9.
Lal, Brij V. 2015. ‘Avatars of Fiji’s girmit narrative’, in F. Gounder (ed.), Narra
tive and Identity Construction in the Pacific Islands. Amsterdam, The
Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 177-93.
Lal, Brij V. 2000. ‘Origins of the girmityas’, in B.V. Lal (ed.), Chalo Jahaji: On a
Journey through Indenture in Fiji. Canberra: Division of Pacific and Asian
History, Australian National University; and Suva: Fiji National Museum,
pp. 9-119.
Lal, Brij V. 1985. ‘Kunti’s cry: Indentured women on Fiji plantations’, The
Indian Economic & Social History Review, 22(1): 55-71.
Lal, Brij V. and Munro, D. 2014. ‘Non-resistance in Fiji’, in M.S. Hassankhan,
B.V. Lal and D. Munro (eds.), Resistance and Indian Indenture Experience:
Comparative Perspectives. New Delhi: Manohar, pp. 121-56.
Laurence, Keith Ormiston. 1971. Immigration into the West Indies in the Nine
teenth Century. Barbados: CARUP.
Look, Lai Walton. 1993. Indentured Labor, Caribbean Sugar: Chinese and In
dian Migrants to the British West Indies, 1838-1918. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. 1835. ‘Minute on Indian education’, The Post
colonial Studies Reader: 428-30.
Metcalf, Thomas R. 1997. Ideologies of the Raj (vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Mohan, Peggy. 2007. Jahajin. New Delhi: Harper Collins.
Naidu, Vijay. 2004, The Violence of Indenture in Fiji (2nd edn.). Lautoka, Fiji:
Fiji Institute of Applied Studies.
Olick, Jeffrey K. and Robbins Joyce. 1998. ‘Social memory studies: From
“collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices’,
Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1): 105-40.
Roopnarine, Lomarsh. 2007. Indo-Caribbean Indenture: Resistance and Accom
modation. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.
Safran, William. 1991. ‘Diasporas in modern societies: Myths of homeland and
return’, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 1(1): 83-99.
Sanadhya, Totaram. 1914 [1973]). Fiji Dwip men Mere Ikkis Varsh [My Twenty
one Years in Fiji]. Varanasi: Banarsi Das Chaturvedi. Agra: Shivlal Aggrawal
and Company.
Schwartz, Barry. 1996. ‘Memory as a cultural system: Abraham Lincoln in
World War II’, American Sociological Review, 61(5): 908-27.
Shameem, Shaista. 1987. ‘Gender, class and race dynamics: Indian women in
sugar production in Fiji’, Journal of Pacific Studies, 13: 10-35.
28 Farzana Gounder et al.
Tinker, Hugh. 1974. A New System of Slavery: Immigration of Indentured Labour
from India. London: Widenfeld and Nicolson.
Vahed, Goolam. 2014. ‘Power and resistance: Indentured labour in colonial
Natal, 1860-1911’, in M.S. Hassankhan, B.V. Lal and D. Munro (eds.),
Resistance and Indian Indenture Experience: Comparative Perspectives. New
Delhi: Manohar, pp. 95-120.
Vahed, Goolam and Desai Ashwin. 2012. ‘Indian Indenture: Speaking across
the oceans’, Man In India, 92(2): 195-213.
PA RT I
1
Unlike Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana, which accessed Indian inden
tureship after the end of slavery, in Suriname, indentured immigrants
were accessed just before the end of the apprenticeship from 1863-73. The
importation of Indian indentured immigrants in Suriname was not in response
to the labour shortage but intended to avoid the shortage of labour. The labour
shortage was quite clearly envisioned to follow after the full freedom of the
slaves in 1873. However, despite the fact that Indian indentured immigrants
were imported to Suriname just before the end of the apprenticeship, they still
faced the ire of the ex-slaves in a similar fashion to what occurred in Trinidad
and Tobago.
32 Primnath Gooptar
the opposite side of the globe with very profound and divergent
differences in language, social customs, religion, dress and music
(Samaroo 1987). While they came from the same country, India,
they held different perspectives on regional differences, where they
were going and their tenure in their new country of residence in
the Caribbean (Chatterjee 2001). The methods by which European
planters executed the Indian indentured contractual requirements
had an unfair outcome in influencing the communal attitudes
between the ethnic groups in the colonies. For example, Indian
indentured labourers were calculatedly kept away from the rest of
the society (namely the ex-slaves and the Chinese and Portuguese)
geographically, socially and culturally. The planters portrayed the
ex-slaves stereotypically as poor workers, lethargic, reckless and
frivolous. East Indians, on the other hand, were considered hard
working, compliant, submissive and controllable. The East Indians
soon espoused the planters’ negative views of the ex-slaves, who, in
turn, saw the Indians as miserly, violent (domestic violence), taking
bread from their mouths (preventing them from bargaining for
higher wages) and heathens for not accepting Christianity and
Western ways. The propagation of these stereotypes between the
two major groups had the desired effect, as far as the white plant
ers were concerned, of keeping the groups apart. That separation
also helped to keep them from uniting with the ex-slaves and de
manding higher wages from the planters. The coloured persons
and ex-slave group consisted mainly of Africans. There were also
Portuguese and Chinese immigrants, but the stereotyped ex-slave
mentality was aimed mostly at the African ex-slaves (Haraksingh
1981).
By analysing the historical relationship between the coloniser,
the Indian indentured immigrants and the ex-slaves, one can trace
the roots of the legacy of the Indians and the impact they had on
the various Caribbean islands in which they were domiciled.
It is noteworthy that with the culpability of the plantation owners,
the ex-indentured immigrant Indians were encouraged, whether
passively or otherwise, to take up residence in plots ‘loaned’ to them
or rented to them by the estates, or sometimes they were encour
aged to continue living on the estates. In Trinidad and Guyana,
The Legacy of Indian Indentureship in the Caribbean 33
the planters also used their influence with the governor to allow
Indian settlers to occupy adjacent Crown lands free of charge. So,
while the former-indentured workers were encouraged to live close
to the estates and could pursue their own agenda, the planters were
happy to have them close by as additional labour, especially as
seasonal workers at crop time, when additional hands were needed
on the estate (Laurence 1994). This reassurance to live close to the
estates encouraged the development of small villages around the
estate peripheries. As those grew, they became settlement commu
nities, which were referred to by outsiders as ‘Indian settlement
communities’. On the other hand, some adventurous ex-indentured
Indian immigrants, not wishing to return to the estates, relocated
further afield in forested and grassy or swampy areas. These indi
viduals became coal burners, rice planters and gardeners and created
their small settlement communities.
In those Indian settlements, the ex-indentured immigrants bonded
together because of their shared values, ethics, cultural similarities,
religion, dress and social life. These bonds, based on their com
monalities, created strength and cohesiveness within their evolv
ing society. In developing their ‘exclusive’ Indian settlements, they
unwittingly formed a barrier between the white colonial planters
and the freed ex-slaves who vented their ire on them. That fractur
ing, however, helped to structure and shape the lives and pathways
of the Indian immigrants and their descendants on the islands,
perpetuating the division between the two ethnic groups.
The indentured Indian immigrants held India as their cultural
and spiritual home and that helped them to shape and keep their
identity alive even on the sugar estates. At the end of their inden
tureship, at least 80 per cent of them made the Caribbean their
home, yet they did not sever ties with India. In most cases, with
the coming into being of their settlement communities, those ties
were strengthened by the sheer cohesiveness of the new communi
ties and their willingness to subsist in a hostile land. They were in
survival mode in a country they had chosen to be their new home.
Many of the push and pull factors forced them to look inwards,
and, in doing so, revived the memories of their identity in India,
which they transplanted to the new land (Gooptar 2012).
34 Primnath Gooptar
Indians, in the larger evolving communities, turned inwards for
self-protection, preservation and to find meaning to their existence
in those colonies. They recreated parallel communities based on
units from their jahaji bundles (the real and the imagined jahaji
bundles) with their systems of sustainability, economic activity,
culture, language, food, flora and fauna.2 They practised their cul
ture from memory, and, over time, converted it into ‘Indian cul
ture’ in the Caribbean that affirmed the historical memory they
had brought with them. Many of their memorialised practices
were informed, validated, influenced or reinforced by their local
communal settings. This linkage to the homeland gave them the
strength and courage to continue along the path they had con
sciously chosen, creating in that evolutionary process new cultural
meanings from what they had brought from India in their jahaji
bundles. That legacy, associated with their new environments, was
passed onto future generations.
The free Indians were becoming a reckoning force. Nanlal
Ramcharan, basing his interpretation upon stories he heard from
his parents and on his observations, indicated that by 1920,
. . . from what I came to know of my own and what my parents and grand
parents told us, their culture was of foremost importance to them. They did not
want to give up their culture, their way of life, the way of living, their language
and most of all their dress and so they kept more to themselves and only went
into the town whenever they had to purchase supplies or attend to a legal
matter. They developed their means of self-containment and survival, and there
were very few things that they purchased in the town centres. Transportation
was difficult to get from where we lived, and so they only went to Cunapo
(Sangre Grande) for supplies such as oil, pitch oil, salt and flour. They grew most
of what they ate: bodi, seime, carille, pumpkin, seasonings, corn, rice, dhal
(urdhi, pigeon peas etc.) and cassava.3
2
Jahaji Bundle: A big bag or cloth tied at the top and containing one’s
personal items. Jahaji is a Hindi word meaning shipmate, specifically, those
indentured servants who travelled from India to the Caribbean on the same
ship. A jahaji bundle was the bundled possessions of those servants.
3
Nanlal Ramcharan. Interview with Nanlal Ramcharan. Plum Road, Sangre
Grande, Trinidad. 100 years old, 2009.
The Legacy of Indian Indentureship in the Caribbean 35
In this way, they avoided contact with Afro-Trinidadians and
developed their parallel communities. The same could be extrapo
lated for Guyana, Suriname, and some of the other Caribbean
countries.
Because of the rejection they faced from the outside world, the
Indians sought to become self-sustaining, and, in the process, be
came a force to reckon with as they developed their parallel societies.
Thus, they kept alive their collective memory of India among them
selves through their songs, music, dances, religion and other aspects
of life and living. The indentured immigrants had a long civilisa
tional history that followed them around, and their memorialised
history was responsible for the creation of their new homes in the
new lands. In addition, that history helped East Indians to recon
stitute aspects of the old homeland in the Caribbean. In the re
creation of their new homeland, the new cultural environment
and the natural landscape were contributing factors to the early
identity that East Indians created in the Caribbean. Their isola
tion and their rural residency allowed them the chance to develop
new cultural settings based on existing cultural and religious realities
(Lowenthal 1972). They had dotted the landscape with jhandis,
temples, mosques, and had kept alive their songs, music and
dances.
From the perspective of non-Indians, the Indians were often
seen as a closed community ‘doing their own thing’. They were,
therefore, regarded not as part of the society, but as birds of pas
sage, who would soon return to their original homeland. They
were seen as not belonging and different because they spoke Hindi
and all their practices were different from the ex-slaves.
However, from the Indians’ perspective, while they maintained
a seperate and distinct identity, they considered themselves part
of the country. They had chosen to make the new territory their
homeland, and, as such, began to put down their roots. Those
roots spread to other parts of the country outside of their parallel
societies. Soon, identity markers emerged that helped to solidify
the community against the onslaught from the ex-slaves and Wester
nised values.
36 Primnath Gooptar
IDENTITY
IDENTITY MARKERS
JAHAJI BHAI