Npt11ngo Hall
Npt11ngo Hall
Convenors: Xanthe Hall, IPPNW; John Loretz, IPPNW; Urs Cipolat, Tri-Valley CAREs; Diane
Perlman, PsySR
Speaker: Xanthe Hall, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War
NGOs working for nuclear disarmament have, year after year, participated in the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Conferences in order to promote the transition to a
nuclear weapon-free world with three obligations of non-proliferation, disarmament
and the abolition of nuclear weapons. The treaty contains all three obligations and does
not make a hierarchy of them. We consider them all equally important to the survival of
our world.
Some say we should not admit that the NPT is in crisis for fear of undermining it. We
disagree. In order to make the Treaty work as it was intended, we must recognise that it
has long been in crisis. Secretary-General Annan's High-level Panel on Threats,
Challenges and Change did just that. In its recent report, it stated that "the nuclear non-
proliferation regime is now at risk because of lack of compliance with existing
commitments, withdrawal or threats of withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-
Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons to escape those commitments, a changing
international security environment and the diffusion of technology." The Panel's final
conclusion is especially alarming: "We are approaching a point at which the erosion of
the non-proliferation regime could become irreversible and result in a cascade of
proliferation."
We consider it our common responsibility at this Conference to stop the further erosion
of the NPT and to strengthen the Treaty. Even though the NPT is in crisis, it remains a
fundamental stepping-stone on the way towards a safer, nuclear weapon-free world.
The NPT has set the global norms for non-proliferation and disarmament for 35 years,
and the vast majority of its members continue to comply with its obligations without
question. We commend these countries and appeal to all NPT member states to work
tirelessly toward the preservation and strengthening of the Treaty.
4
your deliberations about the future of the NPT.
.S
disaster, such as the December tsunami, health services are barely able to cope and often
break down. In a nuclear war there would be no chance at all.
The goal of this opening statement is to show you why we believe that nuclear weapons
in the 21 5` century are obsolete. At the end of these presentations, we intend to also
provide you with a set of carefully deliberated recommendations on how to move
forward toward the elimination of nuclear weapons worldwide.
More collectively prepared NGO presentations will now follow. These include NGO
expert analyses of topics you will be discussing over the next few weeks. Many NGOs
will present additional events and briefings on these topics during the Conference.
These are interspersed with the "voices" of the people, including those of indigenous
peoples, youth, and the hibakusha. Even though numerous, all of our interventions
today underscore the centrality of the NPT and the categorical imperative of achieving a
nuclear weapon free world.
At the end of this session, we will have the opportunity for a direct exchange - there will
be time set aside for "interactivity" between you - the States parties - and us, the citizens
of the world who have dedicated our lives to the abolition of nuclear weapons. We
thank you for attending this session, and we appreciate your rapt attention. For the
information, perspectives and analysis you are about to hear will not only inform your
debate, but it will enable you to use this Review Conference to get us that much closer to
a nuclear weapon-free world.
From where you are now, the global abolition of nuclear weapons may seem a long way
off. But it is the only way. And the sooner you start, the sooner you'll get there. As
NGOs, we are here not only as a voice of civil society reminding you to get on with the
job, but also a source of technical, scientific and medical knowledge at your disposal.
The closer we are able to work together toward our common goals of peace, security and
sustainability, the more likely it is that we will achieve them. And achieve them we
must.
Ic