STATE OF NEW MEXICO SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SIERRA STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel.

DEBORAH TOOMEY, an individual, Plaintiff, No. D-0721-CV2009-98 vs. HON. WILLIAM SANCHEZ CITY OF TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES, et al., Defendants.

AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN COMES NOW Ronald Fenn and states as follows: 1. Since October 2008 I have regularly attended public meetings of the

Truth or Consequences City Commission and the Planning & Zoning Commission. 2. I make extensive use of public records requests to ensure I am

informed of the affairs of our local government. 3. I attended two instructional training sessions for municipal

administrators and interested citizens, presented by the office of the Attorney General and the Foundation for Open Government on governmental transparency.

AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 1

4.

I strongly believe that an informed electorate is essential to a

functional government. As such, I perform thorough research on issues and proposals before our governing body so that I may pose appropriate questions and share an informed opinion. 5. Unfortunately, the public servants in Truth or Consequences do not

share my view. 6. It is my experience that the City regularly violates IPRA by not

responding within the statutory timeframes, claiming a request is burdensome when it is not, claiming records do not exist when they do exist, and falsifying records in an attempt to hide dishonest acts. The most recent, and highly creative, method of denying public records request is to claim it is the creation of a new document. 7. On May 18th 2011 I requested a statistical report on all T or C utility

Customers, number only. The report was generated on the 20th and I received it the next day. 8. On the 29th of August 2011 I made an IPRA request for a list of

Sanitation Customers (Commercial) by classification with company names and addresses. I received a 12 page listing produced on 31 August 2011, Titled Selected Services Report which appears to be an Excel type spreadsheet report
AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 2

produced by BGARCIA. 9. I made a similar IPRA request on September 21, 2011, for the

Commercial Utilities Database in electronic format, the same database that contains the audit log Ms. Toomey has been attempting to get for the last several years. The response from Ms. Berna Garcia claimed that the database doesnt distinguish between residential and commercial users, and therefore it would be the creation of a new record. However, since there are different billing rates for residential and commercial customers, the database must distinguish between residential and commercial customers. In addition, Ms. Garcia stated that since the database contains confidential information (such as SSN, date of birth, etc.), the City did not have to comply with the IPRA request as redacting the information would be the creation of a new document. City has refused to comply with IPRA for my request of the commercial utilities database. 10. It has also been my experience that our local public officials and

servants regularly intimidate, harass and retaliate against anyone who questions the affairs of our local government. 11. In early 2009 I began to make IPRA requests on the Citys plans to

procure a mobile home for a Municipal Courthouse rather than as a public works project. I noted numerous violations of the Procurement Code and what can only
AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 3

be described as bid rigging. As I attempted to question and bring to light issues I was discovering, on April 23, 2009 the City Manager filed a complaint against me with the Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Professional Surveyors (Case No. 10-09-08). 12. Although I was required to answer the complaint in an approximately

two week period or face possible prosecution, it took more than two yearsuntil July 28, 2011to resolve with a finding of no cause of disciplinary action. However, a seated City Commissioner regularly called me a liar and as proof referred to this investigation on numerous occasions during public meetings. 13. As for the IPRA requests on the Municipal Courthouse for change

orders, City claimed no such records exist for thousands of dollars of change orders and numerous other documents that must exist as the manufacturer Clayton Homes told me they did but as they were dealing with Anderson Homes, the contractor with the City, the documents could not be given me by them. 14. The citizens of Truth or Consequences spent close to $400,000 on a

project that was not to exceed $167,000. In fact, we didnt build a public works project. It is more appropriately referred to as a big Xerox machine since our Municipal Courthouse was procured as tangible personal property. 15. Determining that I may be more effective on our local governing

AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 4

body, I declared my candidacy for City Commission in January 2010. 16. On February 4, 2010, a month before the election, I received what I

believe to be a City-sanctioned official intimidation attempt in the form of a certified complaint of Zoning Code Violation by the Code Compliance Officer. It alleged the use of my motor home as Recreational Vehicles as Dwellings Sect 11-11-6 of the City Zoning Code. Neither I nor anyone else was living in the motor vehicle. It was parked under the roofed carport that was erected under permit of the City for that purpose. I wrote a letter to the City denying the motor home was being utilized as a dwelling and the matter was dropped. 17. On April 8, 2010, I submitted an IPRA request for all documents

supporting the threatened citation for dwelling in a recreational vehicle, which should have included inspection notes at the least, and received nothing other than a copy of the original citation, not even a copy of my letter denying the charges. 18. Interestingly enough, no action was taken on the threatened citation,

not even a response to my denial of violation nor a withdrawal of the violation, supporting my belief that this complaint was nothing more than harassment. 19. On May 3, 2011, a Planning &Zoning public hearing was held for

variance of building height based upon topographical hardship. Having received a copy of the P&Z packet associated with this matter, I made several visits to the
AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 5

site and took numerous photos as the location of the proposed building on the site was not marked on the site or provided in advance of the meeting. As I could not find evidence of the topographical anomaly described in the variance application I presented my findings to the P&Z Commission during the public hearing. 20. The matter was contentious and the developer introduced a

topographic map to the P&Z Commission for a few moments scrutiny, but was not available for either close study or in the commission package as part of the application for variance. The Citys Building Inspector testified that he was relying on a survey report and disregarded the evidence I presented at the public hearing of a lack of any topographical hardship. 21. The variance was approved by the P&Z Commission even though

none had a clear idea of the size and location of the building. The next day, May 4, 2011, I submitted an IPRA request for the Drawings, Elevations & plans presented at the previous nights hearing. Although I was allowed to view and copy a site plan that was not previously given me in the Commission package, it was not the topographic map with the floor plan superimposed as presented at the hearing 22. I resubmitted the IPRA request on May 11, 2011, in an attempt to

have the City produce the topographic map with the floor plan, and received a written reply that I had been provided all the information that was provided to this
AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 6

office. This type of response from the Custodian of Recordsthat it is all the information this office hasis fast becoming the Citys latest ploy in refusing to abide by IPRA. 23. On May 25, 2011, I submitted another IPRA request for the specific

drawing that was given into evidence by the developer at the P&Z public hearing and the survey report referred to at that hearing on numerous occasions by the Building Inspector. Once again, I received a letter stating that I had seen all that was available and documents specifically referred to and presented as evidence in a public hearing were not produced. 24. Upon attending the May 25, 2011, City Commission meeting ratifying

the variance approved by the P&Z Commission, I heard discussion of a letter supposedly provided to the P&Z Commission for the May 3rd Public Hearing by the Fire Chief relating to the citys capability of protecting a building of this height. While this letter was also not included in the P&Z package for May 3 rd (and no discussion of the letter occurred on May 3), it was referred to at the City Commission on May 24 as having been submitted to the P&Z on May 3. I requested per IPRA on May 25 to inspect this letter. Interestingly enough, when the letter was produced that supposedly had been part of evidence for May 3rd, the letter from the Fire Chief was dated May 25, 2011. In other words, the City
AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 7

tampered with the public record and created a letter to back up that testimony had occurred when it had not. Fortunately, as is often the case, the City was not diligent in covering their tracks, and the letter requested under IPRA that was submitted to the P&Z meeting on May 3rd had a date three weeks later, coincidentally the same date I requested the letter. 25. It is my experience that employees of the City deny the existence of

public records in order hide certain actions of local government and favored residents. The failure to follow IPRA, and dissuade requests through intimidation and harassment, is the culture of our local government, and an unofficial policy in regards to certain records. I affirm under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of New Mexico that the foregoing is true and correct.

DATED: January 11, 2012 RONALD FENN 316 N. Foch Street Truth or Consequences NM 87901 (575) 894-1543

AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 8

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN was personally faxed on January 11, 2012, addressed to: Jay Rubin (VIA FAX) Attorney for Defendants 575-894-3282

DATED: January 11, 2012

______________________________ DEBORAH L. TOOMEY, Pro se 7010 Phoenix Ave NE, #518 Albuquerque NM 87110 Phone: (505) 315-8503 Fax: (505) 214-5771

AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD FENN Toomey v. City of Truth or Consequences D-0721-CV2009-98

Page 9