Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FMEA
FMEA
1(5)
FMEA
Document name Part no
System
Design
Process
Date Issue Issued by
9th March,2012
Component
Document status
Pos.
FUNCTION
POTENTIAL CAUSES
POTENTIAL EFFECTS
DETECTION METHOD
Out of spec
Recommended Action(s)
Received Material
Questionable durability
Incorrect Set-Up
10
10
10
Parts will not be Amount and time of feed created to will be incorrect assemble May effect dimensions May effect dimensions May not fit assembly May not fit assembly
10
10
0 400
10
0 50
10 10
2 2
7 10
10
40 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10
Page
2(5)
FMEA
Document name Part no
System
Design
Process
Date Issue Issued by
9th March,2012
Component
Document status
Pos.
FUNCTION
POTENTIAL CAUSES
POTENTIAL EFFECTS
DETECTION METHOD
Recommended Action(s)
Received Material
SEVERITY Rank Effect rate Criteria Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects personal safety, safe item Hazardous- without operation and/or involves non-compliance with 10 warning government regulation without warning Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects safe item operation and/or involves non-compliance with government regulation with warning Item inoperable, with loss of primary function. Item operable, but at reduced level of performance. Customer dissatisfied. Item operable, but Comfort/ Convience item(s) inoperable. Customer experiences discomfort. Item operable, but Comfort/ Convience item(s) operable at reduced level of performance. Customer experiences some dissatisfaction. Fit & finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by average customers. Fit & finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by most customers. Fit & finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by discriminating customers. No effect.
5 Low
Rank 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
CPK < 0.33 > 0.33 > 0.51 > 0.67 > 0.83 > 1.00 > 1.17 > 1.33 > 1.50 > 1.67
OCCURENCE Failure Rate Criteria < 1 in 2 Very High: 1 in 3 Failure almost inevitable 1 in 8 High: 1 in 20 Repeated failures 1 in 80 Moderate: 1 in 400 Occasional failures 1 in 2000 1 in 15 000 Low: 1 in 150 000 Relatively few failures < 1 in 1 500 000 Remote: Failure is unlikeley
DETECTION Rank Detection rate Criteria Design Control will not and/or cannot detect a potential 10 Absolute uncertainty cause/ mechanism and subsequent failure mode; or there is no Design Control. 9 Very remote Very Remote chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Remote chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/ mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Very Low chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/ mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Low chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Moderate chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Moderately High chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. High chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Very High chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Design Controls will almost certainly detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode.
8 Remote