Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Geisler, Norman

Systematic Theology II
Chapters 2 and 3

SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY II
WEEK 1, SESSION 2
Chapter 2

God’s Pure Actuality and Simplicity

Pages 30-57
For test purposes pay close attention to biblical
support for the attributes highlighted in chapter 2.
God’s Pure Actuality and Simplicity

Actuality—that which is in act or that which is


(existence). This is in contrast to “potentiality”—
that which can be, or potential for existence.
Pure actuality is that which has no potential to not
exist or to be anything other than it is.
Pure actuality has no potential of any kind, to say
nothing of the potential to cease to exist.
It is pure act.
Biblical Basis for God’s Pure Actuality

God exists independently of all else: Gen. 1:1; Col.


1:17; Ps. 90:2; Rev. 1:8; Rev. 1:17; John 17:5, cf.
17:24; Rev. 13:8; 17:8.
God gives existence to everything else: Gen. 1:1; Gen.
1:21; John 1:3; Col. 1:16; Rev. 4:11; Acts 17:25; Rom.
11:36; 1 Cor. 8:6; Col. 1:17; Heb. 1:2; Heb. 2:10.
God is pure existence: Ex. 3:14; John 8:58, 59.
The Theological Basis for God’s Pure Actuality

Pure actuality follows from God’s


“uncausality.” God is the uncaused Cause of
everything that exists.
Pure actuality follows from God’s Necessity.
A necessary Being is by definition on who
cannot not exist.
God’s Simplicity

“Simp
le mea
has pa ns wit
rts can hout p
means come a ar t s , f o
indivis part. S r what
capabl ible; th imple
e o f be at is, G also
ing div od is n
ided.” o t
Geisle
r, p. 39
Conclusion

God’s pure actuality is fundamental to the classical


orthodox view of God, from it all the other basic
metaphysical attributes can be derived.
The simplicity (indivisibility) of God is also a
fundamental attribute of classical theism. Simplicity
undergirds not only many of the other crucial
attributes of God but also all other doctrines based
on them.
Chapter 3

God’s Aseity and Necessity

Pages 48-73
For test purposes pay close attention to biblical
support for the attributes highlighted in chapter 2.
God’s Aseity

Definition of God’s Aseity: “Aseity comes


from the Latin aseite, meaning literally “of
oneself.” Used of God, it denotes that He
exists in and of Himself, independent of
anything else. He is self-existent.”
~Geisler, p. 58
God’s Necessity, p. 64

A necessary Being is one whose nonexistence is


impossible; that is, if a necessary Being exists, then He
must exist necessarily. This can be stated in at least
four ways. A necessary Being is

(1)A Being whose nonexistence is not possible;


(2)A Being whose existence is essential;
(3)A Being whose essence is to exist;
(4)A Being whose essence and existence are identical.
God’s Necessity, p. 64

In contrast to a necessary Being, a contingent being is

(1)A being whose nonexistence is possible;


(2)A being whose existence is not essential;
(3)A being whose essence is not to exist;
(4)A being whose essence and existence are not
identical.

{Be able to discuss the contrast between a necessary


Being and a contingent being.}
Biblical and Theological
Basis for God’s Necessity
Biblical Basis
 Gen. 1:1
 Ps. 90:2
 John 1:3
 Acts 17:25
 Rom. 11:36
 Col. 1:16
 Rev. 1:8; 3:14
Summary

“God has both aseity and necessity; His


existence is inherent and necessary. He exists
in Himself, and He cannot not exist. Unlike
creatures, whose existence is derived from
another and is contingent, God’s existence is
both uncaused and independent.”
~Geisler, p. 72

You might also like