Application of Hec-Hms in Rainfall-Runoff and Flood Simulations in Lower Tapi Basin
Application of Hec-Hms in Rainfall-Runoff and Flood Simulations in Lower Tapi Basin
Application of Hec-Hms in Rainfall-Runoff and Flood Simulations in Lower Tapi Basin
Log
• Desktop
•The Desktop holds a variety of windows including
•I
a = 0.2S
•
assumptions:-
• The rainfall over the entire weighted area is assumed to
be the same as that at the rain gage station.
• The equivalent cross-section is assumed to be uniform
throughout the length of the reach.
• Some of the coefficients considered in the SCS curve
Number method and the Snyder’s Unit Hydrograph
method are calibrated values and their actual values on
the field may be different.
• During flow routing in the channel using Muskingum –
Cunge method, it is assumed that there are no losses.
• The linear and area measurements accuracy are limited
by the accuracy of Google Earth data.
• No baseflow is Civil
considered. In the event of a baseflow, the
Engineering Department, SVNIT, Surat
REFERENCES
• Biswa Bhattacharya, Doddi Yudianto and Fransisca
Mulyantri(2008) Training On Hydrological Modelling
with HEC-HMS, UNESCO-IHE Flood Modelling for
management Online Course
• Chow, V.T., Maidment D.R., and Mays, L.W. (1988).
"Applied Hydrology." McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
• Chow, V.T. (1959). “Open channel flow.” McGraw-Hill,
New York, NY
• Calabro, P.S. (2004) Design Storms and Water
Quality Control, J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(1), 28-34.
• Daniil, E.I. and Michas S.N. (2005) Discussion of
“Factors Affecting Estimates of Average Watershed
Slope” by A. J. Hill and V. S. Neary, J. of Hydrologic
Eng., ASCE
•