Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Actdu Workshop 2015: Supported by The Commonwealth Department of Education and The Australian Debating Federation
Actdu Workshop 2015: Supported by The Commonwealth Department of Education and The Australian Debating Federation
2015
Supported by the
Commonwealth
Department of
Education and the
Australian Debating
Fe d e r a t i o n
Chris Bisset
TIMETABLE
Session 1: 9:15am-10:00am (45mins)
Re-thinking debating
Constructing Arguments
(Practise debate)
ACTDU Workshop - 17 October 2015
RE-THINKING
DEBATING
EXERCISE 1.1
Think about all the people or groups who make decisions that
aff ect you who or what are they?
What are some of the decisions or rules they make that aff ect
you?
Which of these decisions or rules aff ect you the most? Why?
Which do you disagree with most? Which are the most
controversial? Are these diff erent? Why (not)?
Consid er the one you disagree with the most; think about how
you could convince someone to agree with you.
Now think about how you would convince yourself you were
wrong about the rule or policy.
ACTDU Workshop - 17 October 2015
Empirical Debates
Assesses the st a t e of th e
w or ld a nd the t r u th of a
sta t em e nt.
Look a t the pa st or t h e
pre se nt .
H int : the y oft en a bo ut
som et hing y ou w ou l d a rgu e
w ith y our pa ren ts a bou t ov er
dinner
T h e A ffi rm a t i v e m u s t p ro v e t h e
s t a t e m e n t i s m o re t r u e t h a n f a l s e
T h e N e g a t i v e m u s t p ro v e t h e
s t a t e m e n t i s m o re f a l s e t h a n t r u e .
Supported by the Comm. Dep. Of
Education &
BE AMBITIOUS IN YOUR
ARGUMENTS!
Policy Debates
Empirical Debates
EXAMPLE 1:
THAT ALL S CHOO L STU DENTS SHO ULD B E F ORC ED
T O DO 1 H OUR OF EXERCI SE EVERY DAY AT S CHOO L
Pr a c t i c a l Q u e s t i o n
What and how much of it will happen?
Principled question?
What is more important?
EXAMPLE 2:
THAT WE SHOULD BAN SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLS.
Pr a c t i c a l Q u e s t i o n
What and how much of it will happen?
Principled question?
What is more important?
EXERCISE 1.4:
THAT WE SHOULD BAN ANIMAL TESTING
Pr a c t i c a l Q u e s t i o n
What and how much of it will happen?
Principled question?
What is more important?
CONSTRUCTING
PRACTICAL
ARGUMENTS
Think about your abilities are there limits on what you can actually do?
If a friend promised you a million dollars in exchange for doing a backfl ip could
you suddenly do it?
EXAMPLE OF CAUSATION:
THAT WE SHOULD BAN UNDERWEIGHT
MODELS
AFFRIMATIVE ARGUMENT: We should ban underweight
models because they create harmful body image
issues.
Steps of causation that must be proved
1. There are currently dangerously underweight
models (why)
2. Vulnerable people see these models (how and why)
3. Vulnerable people want to emulate what they see
(how and why)
4. When they try to look the same as models it has
harms (how and why)
ACTDU Workshop - 17 October 2015
CONSTRUCTING
PRINCIPLED
ARGUMENTS
E xe rc i s e 2 . 2 : Wr i t e i n s o m e
f e a t u re s o f t h e s e d e c i s i o n
m a ke r s :
As to their competence to
make a particular decision.
Eg. to choose an educa tion,
to adopt a particular course
of treatment.
What do you know about the
perspective and qualities
required to make this type of
decision.
PREPARING FOR
A DEBATE
Offer a
different
model
Aim for
a
different
endgame
Rechara
cterise
the
status
quo
Which
approac
h would
you
take on
the
negativ
e?
Why?
EXERCISE 2.4
Topic is: That Australia should adopt a carbon tax
If the Neg says The government doesnt have any right to
limit businesses ability to make money, what kind of
diff erence is that?
THE AGENDA
Affi rmative
1. W h at s ha pp en in g no w an d
w h at s wron g wit h it ?
2. W h at s h ou ld we c h an g e wit h
o ur mod el wh o will d o w ha t
d iff e ren t ly?
3. W h at will o ur e nd - g am e b e?
4. W h at will t h e n eg at ive s a y
a bo ut t h e S Q, mec h an is m an d
e nd g ame ?
If there are options consider them
and decide which is hardest for you.
5. What are the key arguments for their
approach in light of ours?
Negative
1. W h a t s h a p p e n in g n ow i s
t h e re a n y t h i n g wron g w i t h i t ?
2. W h a t wi l l th e a ffi rm a t i v e
p ro p o s e to d o ?
3. W h a t i s th ei r l i ke ly e n d - g a m e ?
4. I n li g h t of t h a t - d o y ou n e e d a
c o u n t e r- m o d e l o r c a n we s a y
t h a t th e y w il l m a ke it w o r s e ?
5. W h a t a re th e key a rg u m e n t s fo r
t h e ir a p p ro a c h in l ig h t o f o u r s ?
G iv en y o u r a n s w e r s :
6. W h a t wi l l y o u n e e d t o p rov e ?
Supported by the Comm. Dep. Of
Education &
TIMELINE
0-5mins
Brain storm
20-30mins
30-40mins
40-50mins
Write
50-60mins
Refi n e
EXERCISE 3.5
That we should close all zoos
3.
FEEDBACK
bit.ly/ACTDUdebate