Sip 160310202055
Sip 160310202055
A 3-year roadmap of
interventions for the school
To be undertaken with the help
of the community and
stakeholders.
School Improvement Plan
It is formulated based on
evidences, results and intended
for the learners.
A requirement of the School
Based Management (SBM).
Prepared by the School-
Community Planning Team (SPT).
School Improvement Plan
1. ACCESS
2. QUALITY AND RELEVANCE
3. MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL
SERVICES
4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
SIP Content (New Version)
1. ACCESS
2. QUALITY
3. GOVERNANCE
ACCESS Every Filipino has access to
complete basic education
problems, or challenges in
school?
ACCESS Every Filipino has access to
complete basic education
Grade 6 to Grade 7
Grade 10 to Grade 11 (SHS)
QUALITY Every graduate is prepared
for further education and the world of work
Instructional Supervision
QUALITY - Every graduate is prepared
for further education and the world of work
Sources of Data
School-Community Data (Annex 1A) 45/17
NEXT ACTIVITY
DepEDs Vision How should the students
be trained if we envision
We dream of Filipinos who them to have these
passionately love their country and virtues?
As a learner-centered public
institution, the Department of How can our school
continuously improve?
Education continuously improves
itself to better serve its
stakeholders. BACK
DepEDs Mission
To protect and promote the right of every How can the school
Filipino to quality, equitable, culture-based, facilitate for the
realization of this
and complete basic education where: mission?
Students learn in a child-friendly, gender-
sensitive, safe and motivating environment; How can our school
personnel realize
Teachers facilitate learning and constantly this mission?
nurture every learner;
Administrators and staff, as stewards of the How can the
institution, ensure an enabling and supportive community be
actively involved
environment for effective learning to happen; for the realization
of this mission?
Family, community, and other stakeholders
are actively engaged and share responsibility
for developing life-long learners. BACK
DepEDs Core Values
What can you
Maka-Diyos, contribute to make this
core values become the
Makatao virtue of our students?
BACK
SPT Output 2
Planning Teams Timeline
Activities Date Remarks
Preparatory Activity
Gathering and Organization of Data Jan 12
ASSESS
Phase 1: ASSESS
Identify/Review Improvement Areas
Use the results of the Preparatory
Activity
Check schools current SIP for IAs
ACCESS
GOVERNANCE
QUALITY - EveryFilipino
Effective,
hastransparent,
access to
Every graduate is prepared for
complete basic education
and collaborative
further educationgovernance of basic
and the world education
of work
Phase 1: ASSESS
(Analysis of Previous & Current IAs)
Analyze the Improvement Areas
What IAs in the previous SIP were
successfully implemented? Not successfully
implemented? Why?
!
Contributing Inhibiting that Require
Needed Implemented
Yes/No Explanation Factors Attention
!
problems counseling
WHERE IS THE GAP? students
-Child labor
Reading 1. Phil-IRI NO Average 1. Enhanced Non-
-Reading
Compre- Results for non-readers School Reading Readers
practice
hension the last 3 SY of the school Program
-Supple-
Develop- has been
mental 2. SBTP on
ment greater than
2. Analysis of reading developing
10%
Phil-IRI Results materials Reading
(IR, InR, Comprehension
NonReader) ANY GAP? of students
The GAP is a prospect for
improvement
Improvement Strategic
Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Ave Interpretation
Area Importance
Rubric in Identifying Priority Improvement Areas
Criteria Description Scale
Reading
5 5 3 5 4.5 Very High
1
comprehension
Lack of
2 3 3 5 3.25 Moderate 4
professional Priority
development
High 2 5 4 4 3.75 High 2
dropout Priority
Low intake of 5
3 3 4 4 3.5 High 3
year old children Priority
in kindergarten
School Improvement Planning
PLANNING WORKSHEET (Annex 5)
Time Frame
General Root
Priority Improvement Areas SY SY SY
Objectives Cause/s
2016- 2017- 2018-
17 18 19
1. Reading Comprehension ? ?
2. High dropout ? ?
3. Low intake of 5 year old
children in kindergarten
? ?
4. Lack of professional ? ?
development
Walking School Processes
Example: Developing Reading Proficiency
Time Frame
Priority Root
General Objectives SY SY
Improvement Areas Cause/s SY
2016- 2017-
2018-19
17 18
Streams Analysis
NEXT
Fish Bone Diagram
DIAGRAM
Problem Tree
Which is the
Root English NAT MPS is 54%
Problem? for SY 2014-2015
QUALITY GOVERNANCE
School Head observes
78% Promotion Rate
3 0 one teacher a week
Poor Reading
22
4
Comprehension of Pupils
1 Instructional
supervision is limited
to lesson plan
3
Teachers use chalk-talk 1 checking. 15
teaching activity
School Head utilizes 2-
Teachers dont use 3 2 3 days in
appropriate teaching administrative
strategies functions. 06
School Improvement Planning
PLANNING WORKSHEET (Annex 5)
Time Frame
Priority
Improvement General Objectives Root Cause/s
SY SY
Areas SY 2018-19
2016-17 2017-18
PREVIOUS NEXT
School Improvement Planning
PLANNING WORKSHEET (Annex 5)
Time Frame
Priority Improvement SY SY
General Objectives Root Cause/s SY
Areas 2016- 2017-
2018-19
17 18
Time Frame
Priority
General Objectives Root Cause/s
Improvement Areas SY SY
SY
2016- 2017-
2018-19
17 18
Teaching strategies
utilized by teachers
dont facilitate reading
comprehension
development
School head To improve the Teachers dont use
utilizes 2-3 instructional appropriate
days in supervision of the instructional materials
adminis- school head.
trative School Head
functions observes 1 teacher a
week.
Phase 1: ASSESS
(Analysis of PIA)
Time Frame
Priority Improvement
General Objectives Root Cause/s
Areas SY SY
SY
2016- 2017-
2018-19
17 18
No supplementary
reading materials
Phase 1: ASSESS
(Analysis of PIA)
Listen to the Voice of the learners
and other stakeholders. Consider the
following:
Non-Planners Perspective (Observers)
Clients (Experience)
Teachers (Implementers)
Phase 1: ASSESS
Secretary
Members
Project Project
Team Design
Annex 5
Goals and
Root Causes
Causes of Identification
Gap
Analysis GAPS of Root and Annex 8
Core
Annex 4 Prioritization Problems
New
GAPS? Improvement Processes?
Areas
Project Project
Team Designs
Annex 5
Goals and
Root Causes
Causes of Identification
Gap
Analysis GAPS of Root and Annex 8
Core
Annex 4 Prioritization Problems
New
GAPS? Improvement Processes?
Areas
Success Indicators
Person(s) Responsible
Seminar Workshop Primary teachers trained May School Principal P6,000.00 MOOE
in Explicit Teaching in explicit teaching 2015
Strategy in strategy in developing
Developing Reading reading skill
Phil-IRI Pretest Classification of the June Grade II Advisers P100.00 MOOE
reading skills of 2016
students.
Reproduction of Supplementary reading June Grade II Advisers P5,000.00 SEF
supplementary materials for Grade II 2016
reading materials non-readers
Developing Reading Progress Chart of June to Grade II Advisers P3,700.00 MOOE
Instruction individual pupils in October & Pupils
reading
Midyear Reading Individual pupils reading October Grade II Advisers P150.00 MOOE
Assessment assessment record & Pupils
TOTAL P14,950.00
Project Title: IMPROVING ENGLISH NAT MPS
Problem Statement: Current NAT MPS is at 54% for SY 2014-2015
Project Objective Statement: To increase the English NAT MPS from 54% to 75% for SY 2015-2016
Root Cause: Poor reading comprehension of pupils and Teaching strategies utilized by
teachers dont facilitate reading comprehension development
Date of
Person Budget
Activity Output Implemen- Budget
Responsible Source
tation
Seminar-workshop of teachers Teachers trained in developing reading May 2016 School P6,000.00 MOOE
in developing reading comprehension skills of pupils Principal
comprehension skills of the
pupils
Phil-IRI Pre-Test Classification of the reading proficiency of June 2016 Grade 3 & 6 P500.00 MOOE
the pupils Advisers
Formulation of the Class/Grade Class/Grade Level Reading Program June 2016 Grade 3 & 6 P1,500.00 MOOE
Level Reading Program Advisers
Reproduction of reading 100 Supplementary reading materials June to Grade 3 & 6 P7,500.00 MOOE
materials for the Grade 3 and October Advisers
6 pupils
Implementation of the Progress Chart and Status Report of June to Grade 3 & 6 P150.00 MOOE
Class/Grade Level Reading Reading Program Implementation October Advisers and
Program Pupils
Monitoring and Supervision of Observation/Individual Teacher Teaching June to School P500.00 MOOE
the Grade 3 and 6 Class/Grade Report October Principal
Level Reading Program
Phil-IRI Post-Test Reading Progress and Classification of the October Grade 3 & 6 P500.00 MOOE
Reading Proficiency of Pupils after the Advisers and
Class/Grade Level Reading program Pupils
TOTAL P16,650.00
Project Workplan and Budget Matrix (Annex 9)
Project Title: IMPROVING THE INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION OF SCHOOL HEAD
Problem Statement: School head utilizes 2-3 days a week for administrative functions.
Project Objective Statement: School head shall utilize at 3 days a week for instructional supervision
Root Cause: Teachers use chalk-talk teaching activities
Date of
Person Budget
Activity Output Implemen Budget
Responsible Source
-tation
ACCESS
QUALITY
GOVERNANCE
BACK NEXT
Phase 2: PLAN
Writing the School Operating Budget
Source of Funds
Program/ Projects/ Activities Remarks
MOOE SEF IGP PTA DONATIONS
ACCESS
Pre-Enrolment Campaign
Child Mapping Survey
School Repainting
QUALITY
Teaching-Learning Process
Improved Instructional Supervision P3,965.00
Pupils/Student Outcomes
Improving the English NAT MPS P16,650.00
BACK
Writing the Annual Implementation Plan
ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Refer to Annex 10
SI Project Title (Project/Program Design)
Project Objective (General Objective(s))
Output for the Year (Deliverables)
Activities (Specific activities in the
Design)
Person(s) Responsible (Project Team)
Budget per Activity (refer to Design)
Budget Source (MOOE, IGP, PTA,
Donations)
BACK
Annual Implementation Plan AIP
School Budget
Project Output for Person(s) Schedule Budget
Improvement Activities per
Objective the Year Responsible / Venue Source
Project Title activity
Improving To increase the 25% Seminar Workshop in School May 2016 P3,000.00 MOOE
Reading Independent Independent Explicit Teaching Strategy Principal
Skills of Readers to 25% Readers in Developing Reading
Grade 2 and Skills
Pupils Instructional 45% Phil-IRI Pretest Grade II June P750.00 MOOE
Readers by Instructional Advisers 2016
45%. Readers
Reproduction of Grade II June P5,000.00 MOOE
supplementary reading Advisers 2016
materials
Developing Reading Grade II June to P4,000.00 MOOE
Instruction Advisers and October
Pupils
Midyear Reading Grade II October P1,250.00 MOOE
Assessment Advisers and
Pupils
Improving School head School head Formulate the Instructional School May 2016 P100.00 MOOE
the shall utilize at utilized three Supervisory Plan for the Principal
Instructional least three days days a week school
Supervision a week for for
of the School instructional instructional Observe classes of three Principal and June-Oct P150.00 MOOE
Head supervision supervision (3) teachers each week Teachers 2016
Analyze observation results School June-Oct P250.00 MOOE
of teachers classes Principal 2016
Conference with identified School June-Oct P250.00 MOOE
teachers in terms of their Principal and 2016
Annual Implementation Plan AIP
School Budget
Output for the Person(s) Schedule Budget
Improvement Project Objective Activities per
Year Responsible / Venue Source
Project Title activity
IMPROVING To increase the English NAT Seminar-workshop of School May 2016 P6,000.00 MOOE
ENGLISH English NAT MPS MPS at 75% teachers in developing Principal
NAT MPS from 54% to for SY 2015- reading comprehension
75% for SY 2016 skills of the pupils
2015-2016
Phil-IRI Pre-Test Grade 3 & 6 June P500.00 MOOE
Advisers 2016
Teaching Strategy/Technique
AFTER TESTING
Project Team should discuss with the
School Planning Team the results/findings
during testing.
When ACTing immediately
ASSESS the implementation
Check the Progress of the AIP
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
PLAN
Project Monitoring Report Form
Scheduled Dates of Monitoring
Mid-Year: _______________________ Year-End: _______________________
Signature of
Project Issues/ Recommenda
Name of Date of Accomplishment SPT and
Objectives and Problems/ tions/ Action
Project Monitoring s/Status to Date Project Team
Targets Challenges Points
Leader
Objectively Verifiable
Narrative Summary Indicators
Means of Verification Important Assumptions
Goal
Higher level objective Measure of achieving Authoritative Source Risks! Stated in
to which your project the goal statement of the Goal Indicator positive form
contributes
Purpose
End of project Which information
Measures of Authoritative Source Risks! Stated in
objective stated as a achieving the purpose of the Purpose positive form
benefit to the target will be checked
statement. These are Indicators
group
when monitoring?
the success
indicators.
Output
Deliverable (product, Measure of achieving Authoritative Source Risks! Stated in
service, etc.) of the the output. These are of the Output positive form
project implementer the targets Indicator
Input
Resources required Measure of required Authoritative Source Risks! Stated in
by the project resources of the of the Input Indicator positive form
implementer project
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LOGFRAME Basic Education Sector Transformation (BEST)
Objectively Verifiable Important
Narrative Summary Indicators
Means of Verification
Assumptions
Goal
Means of Important
Narrative Summary Objectively Verifiable Indicators
Verification Assumptions
Goal
Improving English NAT MPS NAT 2016 English MPS NAT 2016
Purpose
To increase the English NAT NAT MPS of 75% NETRC NAT
MPS from 54% to 75% for SY 2016
2015-2016
Outputs
Seminar-workshop of teachers Teachers trained in developing Attendance List
in developing reading reading comprehension skills of
comprehension skills of the pupils
pupils
Phil-IRI Pre-Test Conducted Classification of the reading Phil-IRI Test
proficiency of the pupils
Results
Basic Education Sector Transformation (BEST)
Important
Narrative Summary Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification
Assumptions
Outputs
Formulation of the Class/Grade Level Reading Copies of Class/Grade
Class/Grade Level Program Level Reading Program
Reading Program
Reproduction of reading 100 Supplementary Utilization of the
materials for the Grade 3 reading materials Supplementary
and 6 pupils Reading Materials
Implementation of the Progress Chart and Status Positive
Class/Grade Level Report of Reading increment/increase of
Reading Program Program Implementation reading results of the
Grade 3 and Grade 6
pupils
Monitoring and Observation/Individual Record of manifested
Supervision of the Grade Teacher Teaching Report developing reading
3 and 6 Class/Grade comprehension
Level Reading Program strategies by teachers
Important
Narrative Summary Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification
Assumptions
Inputs
Goal
Improving the Instructional ISP
Instructional Supervision Supervisory Plan ITTPR
of the School Head Crafted and Minutes of Teacher-
Implemented School Head
Conference
Purpose
School head to utilize 2- ISP ISP Observation/
3 days a week for Implementation Checklist
Instructional Supervision Record ITTPR
Output
Formulate the Instructional Approved ISP of the
Instructional Supervisory Supervisory Plan School
Plan for the school
Basic Education Sector Transformation (BEST)
Output