Virtual Memory Management-Operating Systems

Chapter 9: Virtual Memory
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition, Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne

Chapter 9: Virtual Memory
 Background
 Demand Paging
 Copy-on-Write
 Page Replacement
 Allocation of Frames
 Thrashing
 Memory-Mapped Files
 Allocating Kernel Memory
 Other Considerations
 Operating-System Examples
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition 9.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne
Objectives
 To describe the benefits of a virtual memory system
 To explain the concepts of demand paging, page-replacement

algorithms, and allocation of page frames
 To discuss the principle of the working-set model
Background
 Virtual memory – separation of user logical memory from
physical memory.
 Only part of the program needs to be in memory for
execution
 Logical address space can therefore be much larger than
physical address space
 Allows address spaces to be shared by several processes
 Allows for more efficient process creation
 Virtual memory can be implemented via:

 Demand paging
 Demand segmentation
Virtual Memory That is Larger Than Physical Memory
Virtual-address Space
Shared Library Using Virtual Memory
Demand Paging
 Bring a page into memory only when it is needed
 Less I/O needed
 Less memory needed
 Faster response
 More users
 Page is needed  reference to it

 invalid reference  abort
 not-in-memory  bring to memory
 Lazy swapper – never swaps a page into memory unless page
will be needed
 Swapper that deals with pages is a pager
Transfer of a Paged Memory to Contiguous Disk Space
Valid-Invalid Bit
 With each page table entry a valid–invalid bit is associated
(v  in-memory, i  not-in-memory)
 Initially valid–invalid bit is set to i on all entries
 Example of a page table snapshot:
Frame # valid-invalid bit

v
v
v
v
i
….
i
i
page table
 During address translation, if valid–invalid bit in page table

entry
is I  page fault
Page Table When Some Pages Are Not in Main Memory
Page Fault
 If there is a reference to a page, first reference to

that page will trap to operating system:
page fault
1. Operating system looks at another table to decide:
 Invalid reference  abort
 Just not in memory
2. Get empty frame
3. Swap page into frame
4. Reset tables
5. Set validation bit = v
6. Restart the instruction that caused the page fault
Page Fault (Cont.)
 Restart instruction
 block move
 auto increment/decrement location
Steps in Handling a Page Fault
Performance of Demand Paging
 Page Fault Rate 0  p  1.0
 if p = 0 no page faults
 if p = 1, every reference is a fault
 Effective Access Time (EAT)

EAT = (1 – p) x memory access
+ p (page fault overhead
+ swap page out
+ swap page in
+ restart overhead
)
Demand Paging Example
 Memory access time = 200 nanoseconds
 Average page-fault service time = 8 milliseconds
 EAT = (1 – p) x 200 + p (8 milliseconds)

= (1 – p x 200 + p x 8,000,000
= 200 + p x 7,999,800
 If one access out of 1,000 causes a page fault, then

EAT = 8.2 microseconds.
This is a slowdown by a factor of 40!!
Copy-on-Write
 Copy-on-Write (COW) allows both parent and child processes
to initially share the same pages in memory
If either process modifies a shared page, only then is the

page copied
 COW allows more efficient process creation as only modified

pages are copied
 Free pages are allocated from a pool of zeroed-out pages
Before Process 1 Modifies Page C
After Process 1 Modifies Page C
What happens if there is no free frame?
 Page replacement – find some page in memory,

but not really in use, swap it out
 algorithm
 performance – want an algorithm which will
result in minimum number of page faults
 Same page may be brought into memory several
times
Page Replacement
 Prevent over-allocation of memory by modifying page-fault
service routine to include page replacement
 Use modify (dirty) bit to reduce overhead of page transfers –

only modified pages are written to disk
 Page replacement completes separation between logical

memory and physical memory – large virtual memory can be
provided on a smaller physical memory
Need For Page Replacement
Basic Page Replacement
1. Find the location of the desired page on disk
2. Find a free frame:

- If there is a free frame, use it
- If there is no free frame, use a page
replacement algorithm to select a victim
frame
3. Bring the desired page into the (newly) free

frame; update the page and frame tables
4. Restart the process
Page Replacement
Page Replacement Algorithms
 Want lowest page-fault rate
 Evaluate algorithm by running it on a particular

string of memory references (reference string)
and computing the number of page faults on
that string
 In all our examples, the reference string is
1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Graph of Page Faults Versus The Number of Frames
First-In-First-Out (FIFO) Algorithm
 Reference string: 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 3 frames (3 pages can be in memory at a time per
process)
1 1 4 5
2 2 1 3 9 page faults
3 3 2 4
 4 frames
1 1 5 4
2 2 1 5 10 page faults
3 3 2
4 4 3
 Belady’s Anomaly: more frames  more page faults
FIFO Page Replacement
FIFO Illustrating Belady’s Anomaly
Optimal Algorithm
 Replace page that will not be used for longest period of time
 4 frames example
1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
1 4
6 page
2
faults
3
4 5
 How do you know this?
 Used for measuring how well your algorithm performs
Optimal Page Replacement
Least Recently Used (LRU) Algorithm
 Reference string: 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
1 1 1 1 5
2 2 2 2 2
3 5 5 4 4
4 4 3 3 3
 Counter implementation
 Every page entry has a counter; every time page is
referenced through this entry, copy the clock into
the counter
 When a page needs to be changed, look at the
counters to determine which are to change
LRU Page Replacement
LRU Algorithm (Cont.)
 Stack implementation – keep a stack of page numbers in a
double link form:
 Page referenced:
 move it to the top
 requires 6 pointers to be changed
 No search for replacement
Use Of A Stack to Record The Most Recent Page References
LRU Approximation Algorithms
 Reference bit
 With each page associate a bit, initially = 0
 When page is referenced bit set to 1
 Replace the one which is 0 (if one exists)
 We do not know the order, however
 Second chance
 Need reference bit
 Clock replacement
 If page to be replaced (in clock order) has reference bit =
1 then:
 set reference bit 0
 leave page in memory
 replace next page (in clock order), subject to same
rules
Second-Chance (clock) Page-Replacement Algorithm
Counting Algorithms
 Keep a counter of the number of references that
have been made to each page
 LFU Algorithm: replaces page with smallest

count
 MFU Algorithm: based on the argument that the

page with the smallest count was probably just
brought in and has yet to be used
Allocation of Frames
 Each process needs minimum number of pages

 Example: IBM 370 – 6 pages to handle SS MOVE
instruction:
 instruction is 6 bytes, might span 2 pages
 2 pages to handle from
 2 pages to handle to
 Two major allocation schemes
 fixed allocation
 priority allocation
Fixed Allocation
 Equal allocation – For example, if there are 100 frames

and 5 processes, give each process 20 frames.
 Proportional allocation – Allocate according to the size
of sprocess
i  size of process pi
S   si
m  total number of frames
s
ai  allocation for pi  i  m
S
m  64
si  10
s2  127
10
a1   64  5
137
127
a2   64  59
137
Priority Allocation
 Use a proportional allocation scheme using priorities

rather than size
 If process Pi generates a page fault,

 select for replacement one of its frames
 select for replacement a frame from a process
with lower priority number
Global vs. Local Allocation
 Global replacement – process selects a

replacement frame from the set of all frames;
one process can take a frame from another
 Local replacement – each process selects from
only its own set of allocated frames
Thrashing
 If a process does not have “enough” pages, the page-

fault rate is very high. This leads to:
 low CPU utilization
 operating system thinks that it needs to increase
the degree of multiprogramming
 another process added to the system
 Thrashing  a process is busy swapping pages in and

out
Thrashing (Cont.)
Demand Paging and Thrashing
 Why does demand paging work?

Locality model
 Process migrates from one locality to another
 Localities may overlap
 Why does thrashing occur?

 size of locality > total memory size
Locality In A Memory-Reference Pattern
Working-Set Model
   working-set window  a fixed number of page
references
Example: 10,000 instruction
 WSSi (working set of Process Pi) =
total number of pages referenced in the most recent 
(varies in time)
 if  too small will not encompass entire locality
 if  too large will encompass several localities
 if  =   will encompass entire program
 D =  WSSi  total demand frames
 if D > m  Thrashing
 Policy if D > m, then suspend one of the processes
Working-set model
Keeping Track of the Working Set
 Approximate with interval timer + a reference bit
 Example:  = 10,000
 Timer interrupts after every 5000 time units
 Keep in memory 2 bits for each page
 Whenever a timer interrupts copy and sets the values of
all reference bits to 0
 If one of the bits in memory = 1  page in working set
 Why is this not completely accurate?
 Improvement = 10 bits and interrupt every 1000 time units
Page-Fault Frequency Scheme
 Establish “acceptable” page-fault rate

 If actual rate too low, process loses frame
 If actual rate too high, process gains frame
Working Sets and Page Fault Rates
Memory-Mapped Files
 Memory-mapped file I/O allows file I/O to be treated as
routine memory access by mapping a disk block to a page in
memory
 A file is initially read using demand paging. A page-sized

portion of the file is read from the file system into a physical
page. Subsequent reads/writes to/from the file are treated as
ordinary memory accesses.
 Simplifies file access by treating file I/O through memory

rather than read() write() system calls
 Also allows several processes to map the same file allowing

the pages in memory to be shared
Memory Mapped Files
Memory-Mapped Shared Memory in Windows
Allocating Kernel Memory
 Treated differently from user memory
 Often allocated from a free-memory pool
 Kernel requests memory for structures of varying sizes
 Some kernel memory needs to be contiguous
Buddy System
 Allocates memory from fixed-size segment consisting of
physically-contiguous pages
 Memory allocated using power-of-2 allocator
 Satisfies requests in units sized as power of 2
 Request rounded up to next highest power of 2
 When smaller allocation needed than is available, current
chunk split into two buddies of next-lower power of 2
 Continue until appropriate sized chunk available
Buddy System Allocator
Slab Allocator
 Alternate strategy
 Slab is one or more physically contiguous pages
 Cache consists of one or more slabs
 Single cache for each unique kernel data structure
 Each cache filled with objects – instantiations of the data
structure
 When cache created, filled with objects marked as free
 When structures stored, objects marked as used
 If slab is full of used objects, next object allocated from
empty slab
 If no empty slabs, new slab allocated
 Benefits include no fragmentation, fast memory request
satisfaction
Slab Allocation
Other Issues -- Prepaging
 Prepaging
 To reduce the large number of page faults that
occurs at process startup
 Prepage all or some of the pages a process will
need, before they are referenced
 But if prepaged pages are unused, I/O and memory
was wasted
 Assume s pages are prepaged and α of the pages is
used
 Is cost of s * α save pages faults > or < than the
cost of prepaging
s * (1- α) unnecessary pages?
 α near zero  prepaging loses
Other Issues – Page Size
 Page size selection must take into consideration:

 fragmentation
 table size
 I/O overhead
 locality
Other Issues – TLB Reach
 TLB Reach - The amount of memory accessible

from the TLB
 TLB Reach = (TLB Size) X (Page Size)
 Ideally, the working set of each process is stored
in the TLB
 Otherwise there is a high degree of page
faults
 Increase the Page Size
 This may lead to an increase in fragmentation
as not all applications require a large page
size
 Provide Multiple Page Sizes
 This allows applications that require larger
page sizes the opportunity to use them
without an increase in fragmentation
Other Issues – Program Structure
 Program structure
 Int[128,128] data;
 Each row is stored in one page
 Program 1
for (j = 0; j <128; j++)
for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
data[i,j] = 0;
128 x 128 = 16,384 page faults
 Program 2
for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
for (j = 0; j < 128; j++)
data[i,j] = 0;
128 page faults
Other Issues – I/O interlock
 I/O Interlock – Pages must sometimes be

locked into memory
 Consider I/O - Pages that are used for copying

a file from a device must be locked from
being selected for eviction by a page
replacement algorithm
Reason Why Frames Used For I/O Must Be In Memory
Operating System Examples
 Windows XP
 Solaris
Windows XP
 Uses demand paging with clustering. Clustering brings in
pages surrounding the faulting page
 Processes are assigned working set minimum and working
set maximum
 Working set minimum is the minimum number of pages the
process is guaranteed to have in memory
 A process may be assigned as many pages up to its working
set maximum
 When the amount of free memory in the system falls below a
threshold, automatic working set trimming is performed to
restore the amount of free memory
 Working set trimming removes pages from processes that
have pages in excess of their working set minimum
Solaris
 Maintains a list of free pages to assign faulting processes
 Lotsfree – threshold parameter (amount of free memory) to
begin paging
 Desfree – threshold parameter to increasing paging
 Minfree – threshold parameter to being swapping
 Paging is performed by pageout process
 Pageout scans pages using modified clock algorithm
 Scanrate is the rate at which pages are scanned. This ranges
from slowscan to fastscan
 Pageout is called more frequently depending upon the
amount of free memory available
Solaris 2 Page Scanner
End of Chapter 9
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition, Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne

Virtual Memory Management-Operating Systems

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Virtual Memory Management-Operating Systems

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 9: Virtual Memory

Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition, Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne

 To explain the concepts of demand paging, page-replacement

 To discuss the principle of the working-set model

 Virtual memory can be implemented via:

 Page is needed  reference to it

Frame # valid-invalid bit

 During address translation, if valid–invalid bit in page table

 If there is a reference to a page, first reference to

 auto increment/decrement location

 Effective Access Time (EAT)

 Average page-fault service time = 8 milliseconds

 EAT = (1 – p) x 200 + p (8 milliseconds)

 If one access out of 1,000 causes a page fault, then

If either process modifies a shared page, only then is the

 COW allows more efficient process creation as only modified

 Free pages are allocated from a pool of zeroed-out pages

 Page replacement – find some page in memory,

 Use modify (dirty) bit to reduce overhead of page transfers –

 Page replacement completes separation between logical

1. Find the location of the desired page on disk

2. Find a free frame:

3. Bring the desired page into the (newly) free

4. Restart the process

 Want lowest page-fault rate

 Evaluate algorithm by running it on a particular

 In all our examples, the reference string is

 Belady’s Anomaly: more frames  more page faults

 LFU Algorithm: replaces page with smallest

 MFU Algorithm: based on the argument that the

 Each process needs minimum number of pages

 Equal allocation – For example, if there are 100 frames

 Use a proportional allocation scheme using priorities

 If process Pi generates a page fault,

 Global replacement – process selects a

 If a process does not have “enough” pages, the page-

 Thrashing  a process is busy swapping pages in and

 Why does demand paging work?

 Why does thrashing occur?

 Establish “acceptable” page-fault rate

 A file is initially read using demand paging. A page-sized

 Simplifies file access by treating file I/O through memory

 Also allows several processes to map the same file allowing

 Page size selection must take into consideration:

 TLB Reach - The amount of memory accessible

128 x 128 = 16,384 page faults

128 page faults

 I/O Interlock – Pages must sometimes be

 Consider I/O - Pages that are used for copying

Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition, Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne

You might also like