Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crisologo-Jose Land Bank: G.R. No. 167399 June 22, 2006 Garcia, J
Crisologo-Jose Land Bank: G.R. No. 167399 June 22, 2006 Garcia, J
vs.
LAND BANK
G.R. No. 167399 June 22, 2006
GARCIA, J.
FACTS
On September 25, 1997, Crisologo filed a PETITION for
determination of just compensation respecting 61.786 hectares of
land.
Crisologo faults the Court of Appeals for relying on and lending credence to
the allegations and defenses that Land Bank averred in its answer which it
filed beyond the 15-day period prescribed under Section 1, Rule 11 of the
Rules of Court.
She also blames the trial court for admitting, instead of expunging from the
records, said answer and for not declaring the Land Bank in default.
4
ISSUE
Whether the trial court was correct in admitting
Land Bank’s answer even though it was filed
beyond the 15-day prescribed period?
YES
5
RULING
SECTION. 11. Extension of time to plead. Upon motion and on such terms
as may be just, the court may extend the time to plead provided in these
Rules.
The court may also, upon like terms, allow an answer or other pleading to
be filed after the time fixed by these Rules. (Emphasis added.)
6
Indiana Aerospace
Education “
University vs. Commission on Higher
8
Not lost on the Court, of course, is the fact that Crisologo, after
securing the desired ruling from the trial court, never brought up the
matter of Land Bank’s belated filing of an answer before the CA.
Needless to belabor, issues not raised below cannot, as a rule, be
raised for the first time before the Court.