Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Journal Reading

MDCT and Radiography of Wrist Fractures:


Radiographic Sensitivity and Fracture Patterns

Pembimbing : dr. Novita E.R, SpRad

Rizki Putri Andini R


1710221017

KEPANITERAAN KLINIK DEPARTEMEN RADIOLOGI


PERIODE 12 MARET – 14 APRIL 2018
RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH AMBARAWA, UNGARAN
KAB. SEMARANG, JAWA TENGAH
Introduction
Trauma to the wrist can cause significant soft-tissue and osseous injury, with
scaphoid fractures accounting for up to 70% of carpal bone fractures

Because of the difficulty in recognizing wrist fractures in acute injuries, many


fractures are not found at initial radiographic examination

Radiographic examination is routinely used in the initial evaluation of a suspected


acute wrist fracture. However, because of overlapping structures, possible
suboptimal positioning and technique, lack of dedicated special radiographic
views, and other problems inherent to radiographic analysis, missed wrist
fractures do occur

Because of this, other imaging methods such as CT are also used both in the
primary evaluation of suspected wrist fractures and in the assessment of bone
healing after fracture
Objective Article

The purpose of our study was to determine which wrist


fractures are not prospectively diagnosed at radiography
using CT as a gold standard and to identify specific fracture
patterns.
Material and Methods
Through a search of radiology records from January 1 to December 31,
2005, 103 consecutive patients were identified as having radiographic
and CT examinations of the wrist. After excluding incomplete or
nondiagnostic examinations and those with a greater than 6-week
interval between imaging studies, the final study group consisted of 61
wrist examinations in 60 patients. Two musculoskeletal radiologists
and one emergency radiologist blindly reviewed CT examinations, and
each bone (scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum, pisiform, trapezium,
trapezoid, capitate, hamate, metacarpals, distal radius, distal ulna) was
categorized as normal or fractured, with agreement reached by
consensus. Each prospective radiographic report was categorized as
either normal or fracture/equivocal for each osseous structure. Results
were compared using the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests.
Results
• A total of 61 wrists were evaluated in our study. The study population included 27
men and 33 women. Patient ages ranged from 10–80 years (mean age, 37 years).
Thirty-three of 61 (54%) cases were of the right wrist compared with 28 of 61
(46%) of the left. Mechanisms of injury included fall, motor vehicle accident,
athletic injury
• CT showed a total of 69 fractures in 45 of 61 (74%) wrists. Of these cases with
fracture at CT, radiography reports indicated a total of 48 fractures in 39 of 61
(64%) examined wrists
Results
• Another finding of interest in our study involves a particular
fracture of the scaphoid bone. Of the 16 scaphoid fractures
detected on CT by retrospective consensus, 25% (4/16) were
dorsal avulsion fractures of the scaphoid. As indicated by
Compson et al. and verified by our results, the scaphoid dorsal
avulsion fracture is visible only on the 45° anteroposterior
semisupinated oblique radiographic view of the scaphoid.
Results
• In the proximal carpal row, lunate and triquetrum fractures
were often radiographically occult (0% and 20%, respectively,
detected at radiography); whereas in the distal carpal row,
trapezoid, capitate, and hamate fractures were often occult
(0%, 0%, and 40% detected at radiography, respectively).
Hamate fractures were significantly associated with
metacarpal fractures, and distal radius fractures were
associated with scaphoid and ulna fractures.
CONCLUSION

Radiography failed to detect 30% of wrist fractures


identified at CT, which suggests the importance of
further advanced or cross-sectional imaging for
fracture detection in the correct clinical scenario.

The location of a dorsal scaphoid avulsion fracture


emphasizes the need for specific radiographic views
or cross-sectional imaging for fracture detection.

You might also like