Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School Improvement Plan: Lukay National High School
School Improvement Plan: Lukay National High School
Department of Education
Region VIII
Division of Leyte
Lukay National High School
Lukay, San Miguel.Leyte
Cover Page
Table of Contents 1
Endorsement Letter 2
Introduction 3
Mission, Vision and Core Values 4
Objectives and Targets 5-6
Situational Analysis 7-13
Strategies 14
Action Plan 15-19
Three Year Plans and Actions 20-23
Monitoring and Evaluation Agreements 24-27
3 year work and Financial Plan 27-32
Annual implementation Plan 33-36
Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 37
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VIII
Division of Leyte
LUKAY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Luka,y San Miguel,Leyte
We are happy to inform you that Lukay National High School has completed its School Improvement Plan (SIP) for School
Year School Year 2014-2016 which we are hereby endorsing for your review /acceptance.
We wish to inform your good office that this SIP is a collaborative effort of parents, community leaders, teachers, alumni,
pupils under the leadership of Ralp Jayson the school head.
Thank you and more power!
Accepted:
Lukay National High school came into existence through Republic Act No.9872 which was signed
into law on the 31st of December 2009 by her Excellency Pres. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. School Year 2010-2011
when the school was opened, from then on the has been existing as an independent school situated at Brgy,
Lukay, San Miguel,Leyte,
In quest for the Quality Secondary Education and in order to maintain a high academic standing of
the school, School Improvement Plan came into being. School Improvement Plan is the main vehicle through
which schools will proved down path to improvement, carefully structured to focus on the key goals and
strategies which will lead to greater student learning and a more effective school organization.
Education Act of 2001 or RA 9155 offers a good opportunity of every school the freedom to make
decisions on what they think is best for their learner, believing that school empowerment will lead to a better
and more effective learning organization. Through this premise, this School Improvement Plan came into being.
The School Improvement Plan of Lukay National High School embodies the school and the
communities’ vision of the future. This is a fruit of the collaborative effort of school stakeholders. The school
community planning team exerted much and had a thorough a planning workshop which involves collection of
significant data and interpretation, making options and recommendations on proper interventions that would
address the needs of the school.
Crafted from careful collaboration of the dedicated and committed School Head, Teachers, Parents
and Students we wholeheartedly present this School Improvement Plan that would guide us in attaining the
school goal thus making Lukay National High School a school of academic excellence.
I. Vision, Mission and Core Values
Vision
We dream of Filipinos who passionately love their country and whose values
and competencies enable them to realize their full potential and contribute
meaningfully to building the nation. As a learner-centered public institution, the
Department of Education continuously improves itself to better serve its stakeholders.
Mission
To protect and promote the right of every Filipino to quality, equitable,
culture-based and completed basic education where:
o Students learn in a child-friendly, gender-sensitive, safe and motivating
environment
o Teaches facilitate learning and constantly nurture every learner
o Administrators and staff, as stewards of the institution, ensure an enabling
and supportive environment for effective learning to happen
o Family, community and other stakeholders are actively engaged and share
responsibility for developing life-long learners
Core Values
Maka-Diyos, Makatao, Makakalikasan, Makabansa
II. Objectives and Targets
A. ACCESS
General Objectives: To expand children’s access to education
TO (TARGET)
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES FROM SY 1 SY 2 SY 3
(baseline)
TO (TARGET)
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES FROM
(baseline)
SY 1 SY 2 SY 3
Lukay National High School as a special science high school is having limited
enrolment due to the grade required for the school entrants. Based on the schools
performance indicators, the school has zero percent (0%) drop-out. Problems on child
abuse, discrimination, harassment and other prevailing violence against children are not
present in the school. Attendance of students is not much a problem though only 90% of
students are having perfect attendance. Only 5% of the learners are identified as severely
wasted students and 4% are having health related problems.
The achievement level of the students based on the school achievement test
has reached 75% total MPS for Science Math, English, Filipino and Araling Panlipunan.
Students displayed skills in reading thus only 20% belong to the instructional level and
80% are independent
B. External Analysis
FACTOR DATA OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
Population Based on the projected population by age group of Year 2013- Enrolment will constantly increase Lack of school facilities and teacher
2022, the data generated form the Municipal Planning and items
Development Office by 2015 High School aged children there is a More opportunities of hiring new teachers and
significant increase every year from 3,352 of 2013 to 3,426 of construction of school facilities
2015.
Political Factor Organized Local School Board and available SEF to support the Stable and strong network with the LGU.
education sector that follows a set of rules and regulations set by
the local School Board. Performance Indicators will be maintained at very Dependent parents on the monetary
satisfactory status. support of government.
Congressional scholarship for the poor but deserving college
students Government funded project 4P’s (Programang Pantawid Minimize absenteeism and help solve drop-out Tendency for a child to stop schooling if
ng Pamilyang Pilipino) through the DSWD helping the Filipino problems. not supported by 4P’s
children in their school needs through monetary assistance and
their performance in school by monitoring their attendance.
Economy Based on the data generated from LGU have limited fund for education
www.PhilippinesOnlineDirectory.com. San Miguel is a fifth class
municipality in the Province of Leyte which has an average annual
income of 15 – 25 million
Stakeholders of the locality are commonly those that belong to Establishment of funded projects in the School
the San Miguel Business Association, only 50% support generated
from them.
Ecological Factor San Miguel lies on slightly flat to gently rolling and tough Roads are usually flooded especially
terrain with mountains and narrow coastal areas. San Miguel is those from the barangays.
composed of 21 barangays; 6 are coastal barangays which
usually experience flood during heavy rains, 5 are classified as Distance from home to school is a
mountain barangays. factor to consider on students’
absenteeism especially that come from
far barangays.
Technological Factor Smart Bro/ MyBro WiFi modems are now serving San Miguel Students have easy access to online researches and Absenteeism and cutting classes cause
town that gives an avenue to easy internet access. keep updated with new trends in education and by internet related activities such as
Establishments catering internet services are starting to boom. technology. online games and social networking
sites.
95% of students are using cell phones. Communication access to parents.
Cutting classes, going with the
barkadas, and less interest on lessons.
Teachers
Considering the number of students enrolled inLNHS, the number of teachers is sufficient
enough to cater the needs for instructions. Teachers are new to the service ranging from 8 mos. to 2
years in the service which needs retooling on the prescribed DepEd’s mandates and procedures more
importantly on the implementation of the K to 12 Curriculum, INSET is very much needed.
Conduct of LAC (Learning Action Cell) Sessions, Buzz Sessions and Teams Building
Activities are organized.
Textbooks and other Learning Materials
Textbooks are inadequate with a ratio of 1:28 for the old curriculum and 1: 4 ration of Learners
Material for the Kto12 curriculum .
Being a science high school, the school has no laboratory apparatus for science and math w/c
might be used for laboratory work.
The school was able to receive Book Donations from the Book of Asia Foundation, 1 unit of
computer set and sound system used for instructions and other school activities.
Financial Resources
The school has MOOE however it is not enough to finance all programs and projects being implemented by
the school. The school may seek assistance from internal and external stake holders.
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGHTS WEAKNESSES
OPPURTUNITIES
Increase of enrolment
Construction of new facilities Strengthen Brigada Eskwela and o INSET/Capability Building for teachers
Stable and Strong network with the LGU OBE program o Establish Functional Quality Management
Establishment of New School Campus Enhance Drop-out Reduction System/M&E System
Program o Establish Strong Network with LGU and
Prioritize projects that can be other stakeholder to ensure support for the
provide by the LGU school projects
Make project proposals for school
facilities
Update EBEIS to ensure priority of
School Building Construction
Wise utilization of MOOE
THREATS
Inadequate school facilities
Distance from home to school, Initiation of PTA funded projects. o Request for additional School Building
absenteeism, cutting classes, texting are Ask support from LGU for school o Initiate Fund Raising Activities
among the Risk factors of dropping-out projects o Avail Computerization Project
Limited SEF fund Request for allocation from SEF as
Dependent parents of 4P’s on counterpart for School Programs
governments Monetary Support
IV. Strategies
A. Access
In order to strengthen children’s access to secondary education the following strategies are identified:
Establishing information dissemination to the community.
Establishing mechanism in sustaining students 100% attendance.
Implement health related mechanisms to address health problems.
A. Quality
The school aims to strengthen the Quality of Education in . LNHS through the following strategies:
Organizing mechanisms in achieving quality test results and maintaining high performance and producing independent readers
INSETS and enhancements activities for teacher development
Provision of Effective Learning Support materials
A. Governance
To strengthen governance and to insure adequate supply of school resources these are the strategies that school will
undertake:
To Strengthen the Quality of Increase achievement level o Organizing mechanisms in RRE Program
Education up to 85% achieving quality test Implementation of Project
results, maintaining high BGMS Bridging Gaps
Increase independent performance and through Science and
readers. producing independent Mathematics
readers Implementation Project
Improve Teachers X3(Experience ,Explore,
Competence Through Excel in Science and Math)
Trainings for WIZARDS
Academic and Skills
Competitions
Participation in all
competitions at all level
Student Research/ Science
Investigatory Project
Participation on sports
competition
Testing and Assessments
Periodic Tests
Culminating Performance
Reproduction of Test
materials
School Achievement Test
NAT enhancement classes
Supreme Student Initiated
Activities
Participation in the
Provincial Sports
Competition
Reading Program
Orientation Seminar on
Reading program
Reading Inventory
Reading Remediation
Graduation Exercises ,
Closing and Recognition
Program
o INSETS and NCBTS
enhancements activities Accomplishment of IPPD &
for teacher development SPPD
INSET
K to 12 Trainings
Monthly LAC Sessions
MYPRE
Capability Building
GAD Seminar
o Provision of Effective Teachers Retreat
Learning Support Team Building Activities
materials Provision of Effective LSM’s
Governance Improve classroom- School Building Program
student ratio. Provision of School Building
Provision of
Instructional and Update EBEIS
Improve seat-student Ancillary Facilities
To ensure adequate ratio. Request to SDS for Building
supply of school
resources. Brigada Eskwela
Maintain Toilet-student Repair and Repainting of
ratio. existing old buildings/classrooms
Request for Students ArmChairs
Maintain Teacher-
Provision of School and Office
student ratio.
Supplies
Improve textbook- Reproduction of Learners
student ratio Module (G7)
a.Regular program( Procure chairs for E- Classroom
Science & Math) Lab. and school office
o Stakeholders Pasidungog
o Planning Sessions
o Performance Review
Strategy 1: Organizing mechanism in achieving quality test results and maintaining high performance.
18,000.00
Program 2: Provision of Armchairs, Teachers Tables and Chairs
Classroom Facilities Dependent on the project cost
set by Central Office for Supplies
Specific Objective:
To improve Textbook –student ratio
Strategy 2: Facilitating the delivery of K to 12 and SSC curriculum
Program 1: Reproduction of G7 Learners Modules & Add-on Subjects
Specific Objective:
To implement the construction of learning centres, stage, flagpole and perimeter fence and landscaping
Strategy 1: Improvement/ enhancement schools physical set-up for a safe and healthy environment
Specific Objective:
To strengthen collaboration between the school, parents and LGU
Strategy 1: Organizing committees and activities establishing strong collaboration of internal and external stakeholders
Program 1
Networking and Partnership Conduct of GPTA Assemblies, Board Meetings and Homeroom PTA
meetings
Stakeholders PASIDUNGOG
17,000.00
School Family Day Celebration
Installation of Transparency Board
Program 2
Monitoring, Evaluation & Implementation Organization of SGC, SQMT, GPTA 6,000.00
Committees
Strategy 2: Strategizing actions for school improvement
Program 1
School Strategic Planning Performance Review
SIP Re-visitation and enhancement 6,000.00
AIP & APP crafting
Strategy 3:To strengthen areas of supervision to teachers
Specific Objective:
To intensify the Financial Capability of the school
M & E Procedures
The School Quality Management Team (SQMT) is responsible in the monitoring and evaluation of the
programs and projects implemented by the school based on the School Improvement Plan and the Annual
Implementation Plan. M & E will be done every quarter in order to keep track on the implementation and to provide
objective information that can inform decision-making in order to continuously improve the delivery of school services
for basic education and the school’s performance or health to achieve the desired education outcomes. This will even
provide valid, reliable and accurate data in decision-making to come up with possible actions and interventions to
achieve the said desired education outcomes.
The following are the procedures/processes followed in the School Monitoring Evaluation and
Adjustment (SMEA) Process:
1. Data Gathering
Data gathering is done quarterly by internal M & E Team to Teachers, SHs, & project
Implementers during the pre-work prior to SMEA.
Physical Outputs (PO) accomplished are identified from their work plans together with the
standards if followed.
School Internal Monitoring and Evaluation Team (IMET) consolidate their accomplishments
using PO template and prepares the MOVs to support the report.
Includes identification of issues, facilitating and hindering factors, lessons learned and good
practices encountered by schools which are identified before the SMEA proper.
Collecting both quantitative and qualitative information.
2. Data Validation
Determining if reported data are based on standards set and MOVs.
3. Data Processing and Analysis
Summary of accomplishments, issues for resolution and lessons learn presented to
management.
The quantitative data can be transformed into percentages, ratios, ranks or measures of
central tendency. These are also presented in tables and graphs to show relationship
between variables.
The analysis can also correlate physical outputs with funds utilized.
Analysing information required to answer the M & E questions on efficiency,
effectiveness & relevance.
Agree on a set of Planning Standards
Review data and make initial conclusions.
Write conclusions
4. Management Response
Reporting of M & E results by the school IMET is used to validate information during
the actual MEA.
5. Adjustment of Plan
This can be in terms of modifying the earlier strategies used, rescheduling of activities,
aligning available resources, making decisions on discontinuing the projects, etc.
M & E Structure
Terms and Reference for M & E Team
1. Chair: School Head
The School Head is the process owner of the school M&E system. As process owner the
school head must ensure the integrity and efficiency of the system. This means, providing
accurate, timely and relevant information to the school stakeholders. The School Head will also
be the major beneficiary of the lessons and insights generated by the M & E system.
Specifically, the following outlines the functions, roles and responsibilities of the School Head
Functions:
Manages the QAAS in the school
Ensures implementation of SBM practice
Makes decisions pertinent to improving quality outcomes in the school
Responsibilities
Orients school stakeholders on how to operationalize the QAA and M&E system
Designates the members of the School QMT
Designs monitoring and feedback system (e.g. flow of reports and feedback, reporting schedules,
monitoring and feedback forms);
Convenes School QMT regularly to discuss M & E concerns together with implementation team
Communicates the learners' progress to intended stakeholders
Submits quarterly accomplishment report to SDS and school stakeholders
Interacts with SDS and school internal and external stakeholders
2. School M & E Coordinator
The M & E Coordinator is responsible for the overall M & E strategy and implementation
within the school following the M&E framework for the school. The M & E Coordinator shall
report directly to the School Head and shall provide him/her with interpretation and analysis
of M & E data. The following outlines the roles functions and responsibilities of the M & E
Coordinator:
Function:
Monitors and evaluates regularly the implementation of school improvement plan
Responsibilities:
Conducts monitoring process during plan implementation
Analyses and interprets M&E data for SH and Project teams
Evaluates results of SIP implementation which will be made as basis for planning interventions
and other plan adjustments
Prepares regular M&E reports and submit to SH
Interacts with SH and other members of the SQMT
SIP REPORT ON PHYSICAL OUTPUT AND FINANCIAL STATUS OF PROJECTS & PROGRAMS
PHYSICAL
OUTPUTS
% Done
% Done
% Done
% Done
% Done
% Done
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
OUTPUTS
Target PHYSICAL
Actual
YEAR 1
% Done
Target
Actual
YEAR 2
% Done
PHYSICAL OUTPUT
Target
Actual
YEAR 3
% Done
Target
Actual
YEAR 1
% Done
Target
Actual
YEAR 2
FINANCIAL
% Done
Target
Actual
YEAR 3
% Done
VI. PLANS AND ACTIONS
3 YEAR WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN
Financial Target
Physical Target MOV
(000.00)
Objective Projects/ Activities Indicators S.Y. 201- S.Y. 2014- S.Y. 201-
S.Y. 201- S.Y. 201-2013 S.Y. 201-2015
2014 2015 2014
2013
ACCESS
1. Early
To increase enrolment rate Registration *Number of Registered in- Accomplishment
by 40% Caravan coming Students Report w/
Distribution of Flyers *Number of Elem. Schools 100% 100% 100% 2,000 2,500 3,000 pictorials
Hanging of Tarpaulins Visited
Posting of Posters
4. Feeding
Program * Number of wasted Weighing
students 90% 95% 100% Records
9,000 10,000 12,000
LSM Centre
3.6. Hiring of Watchman for Safe and secured School Job Contract,
school facilities safety facilities Log sheet DTR,
every Sat, and Sunday LGU Accomplishment
50% 100% Funded report
13,500 13,500
2. Organize TOR,
Monitoring *Active Team Members Schedule
and * Organized M & E of
Evaluation Activities
Activities
Committee
SQMT / School M&E
Team
Planning Sessions 80% 100% 100%
600 800 1,000
I. ACCESS
S
E
1. OBE (Oplan Extent of Support from Memo, Attendance sheet, E
To decrease # of students Balik Stakeholders Minutes of meeting 500 500
having 80% attendance Eskwela) A
Convergence w/ T
Stakeholders T
A
C
H
E
1.3 Barangay Visitation *Established linkage w/ LGU COA, Minutes of Meeting D
*LGU Supported 500 500
Programs/Projects P
A
G
E
4. DORP
Implementation of the ff. *Number of Students Visited ACR with photo docs 500 500 1,000
SII: *Number Adopted Student and HV forms
Home Visitation MEMO Attendance Sheets
Adopt A Student
Sagip Kamag-aral
4. Feeding
Program * Number of wasted students ACR, Attendance, 3T 3T 3T
Weighing Records 9,000
Time Frame
ACTIVITIES
J J A S O N D J F M A M
2.Data Gathering / / / /
3.Data Validation / / / /
5.Management Response / / / /
6.Adjustment of Plan / / / /